Napoleon | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries, by Jacques-Louis David, 1812 |
||||
Emperor of the French
(more…) |
||||
1st reign | 18 May 1804 – 6 April 1814 | |||
Coronation | 2 December 1804 Notre-Dame Cathedral |
|||
Successor | Louis XVIII (as King of France) |
|||
2nd reign | 20 March 1815 – 22 June 1815 | |||
Predecessor | Louis XVIII | |||
Successor | Napoleon II (disputed) or Louis XVIII | |||
King of Italy | ||||
Reign | 17 March 1805 – 11 April 1814 | |||
Coronation | 26 May 1805 Milan Cathedral |
|||
First Consul of France | ||||
In office 12 December 1799 – 18 May 1804 |
||||
Co-Consuls | Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès Charles-François Lebrun |
|||
Provisional Consul of France | ||||
In office 10 November 1799 – 12 December 1799 |
||||
Co-Consuls | Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès Roger Ducos |
|||
President of the Italian Republic | ||||
In office 26 January 1802 – 17 March 1805 |
||||
Vice President | Francesco Melzi d’Eril | |||
Protector of the Confederation of the Rhine | ||||
In office 12 July 1806 – 4 November 1813 |
||||
Prince-Primates | Karl von Dalberg Eugène de Beauharnais |
|||
Born | Napoleone Buonaparte[1] 15 August 1769 Ajaccio, Corsica, Kingdom of France |
|||
Died | 5 May 1821 (aged 51) Longwood, Saint Helena, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland |
|||
Burial | 15 December 1840
Les Invalides, Paris, France |
|||
Spouse |
Joséphine de Beauharnais (m. ; div. ) Marie Louise of Austria (m. ; separated 1814) |
|||
Issue Detail |
|
|||
|
||||
House | Bonaparte | |||
Father | Carlo Buonaparte | |||
Mother | Letizia Ramolino | |||
Signature |
Rescale the fullscreen map to see Saint Helena
Napoleon Bonaparte[a] (born Napoleone Buonaparte; 15 August 1769 – 5 May 1821), later known by his regnal name Napoleon I,[b] was a French military commander and political leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and led successful campaigns during the Revolutionary Wars. He was the de facto leader of the French Republic as First Consul from 1799 to 1804, then Emperor of the French from 1804 until 1814 and again in 1815. Napoleon’s political and cultural legacy endures to this day, as a highly celebrated and controversial leader. He initiated many liberal reforms that have persisted in society, and is considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His wars and campaigns are studied by militaries all over the world. Between three and six million civilians and soldiers perished in what became known as the Napoleonic Wars.[2][3]
Napoleon was born on the island of Corsica, not long after its annexation by France, to a native family descending from minor Italian nobility.[4][5] He supported the French Revolution in 1789 while serving in the French army, and tried to spread its ideals to his native Corsica. He rose rapidly in the Army after he saved the governing French Directory by firing on royalist insurgents. In 1796, he began a military campaign against the Austrians and their Italian allies, scoring decisive victories and becoming a national hero. Two years later, he led a military expedition to Egypt that served as a springboard to political power. He engineered a coup in November 1799 and became First Consul of the Republic.
Differences with the United Kingdom meant France faced the War of the Third Coalition by 1805. Napoleon shattered this coalition with victories in the Ulm campaign, and at the Battle of Austerlitz, which led to the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. In 1806, the Fourth Coalition took up arms against him. Napoleon defeated Prussia at the battles of Jena and Auerstedt, marched the Grande Armée into Eastern Europe, and defeated the Russians in June 1807 at Friedland, forcing the defeated nations of the Fourth Coalition to accept the Treaties of Tilsit. Two years later, the Austrians challenged the French again during the War of the Fifth Coalition, but Napoleon solidified his grip over Europe after triumphing at the Battle of Wagram.
Hoping to extend the Continental System, his embargo against Britain, Napoleon invaded the Iberian Peninsula and declared his brother Joseph the King of Spain in 1808. The Spanish and the Portuguese revolted in the Peninsular War aided by a British army, culminating in defeat for Napoleon’s marshals. Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia in the summer of 1812. The resulting campaign witnessed the catastrophic retreat of Napoleon’s Grande Armée. In 1813, Prussia and Austria joined Russian forces in a Sixth Coalition against France, resulting in a large coalition army defeating Napoleon at the Battle of Leipzig. The coalition invaded France and captured Paris, forcing Napoleon to abdicate in April 1814. He was exiled to the island of Elba, between Corsica and Italy. In France, the Bourbons were restored to power.
Napoleon escaped in February 1815 and took control of France.[6] The Allies responded by forming a Seventh Coalition, which defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. The British exiled him to the remote island of Saint Helena in the Atlantic, where he died in 1821 at the age of 51.
Napoleon had an extensive impact on the modern world, bringing liberal reforms to the lands he conquered, especially the regions of the Low Countries, Switzerland and parts of modern Italy and Germany. He implemented many liberal policies in France and Western Europe.[c] British historian Andrew Roberts summarizes these ideas as follows:
The ideas that underpin our modern world—meritocracy, equality before the law, property rights, religious toleration, modern secular education, sound finances, and so on—were championed, consolidated, codified and geographically extended by Napoleon. To them he added a rational and efficient local administration, an end to rural banditry, the encouragement of science and the arts, the abolition of feudalism and the greatest codification of laws since the fall of the Roman Empire.[13]
Early life
Napoleon’s family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family who emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a minor Genoese noble family.[14] The Buonapartes were also the relatives, by marriage and by birth, of the Pietrasentas, Costas, Paraviccinis, and Bonellis, all Corsican families of the interior.[15] His parents Carlo Maria di Buonaparte and Maria Letizia Ramolino maintained an ancestral home called «Casa Buonaparte» in Ajaccio. Napoleon was born there on 15 August 1769. He was the fourth child and third son of the family.[d] He had an elder brother, Joseph, and younger siblings Lucien, Elisa, Louis, Pauline, Caroline, and Jérôme. Napoleon was baptised as a Catholic, under the name Napoleone.[16] In his youth, his name was also spelled as Nabulione, Nabulio, Napolionne, and Napulione.[17]
Napoleon was born in the same year that the Republic of Genoa (former Italian state) ceded the region of Corsica to France.[18] The state sold sovereign rights a year before his birth and the island was conquered by France during the year of his birth. It was formally incorporated as a province in 1770, after 500 years under Genoese rule and 14 years of independence.[e] Napoleon’s parents joined the Corsican resistance and fought against the French to maintain independence, even when Maria was pregnant with him. His father Carlo was an attorney who had supported and actively collaborated with patriot Pasquale Paoli during the Corsican war of independence against France;[5] after the Corsican defeat at Ponte Novu in 1769 and Paoli’s exile in Britain, Carlo began working for the new French government and went on to be named representative of the island to the court of Louis XVI in 1777.[5][22]
The dominant influence of Napoleon’s childhood was his mother, whose firm discipline restrained a rambunctious child.[22] Later in life, Napoleon stated, «The future destiny of the child is always the work of the mother.»[23] Napoleon’s maternal grandmother had married into the Swiss Fesch family in her second marriage, and Napoleon’s uncle, the cardinal Joseph Fesch, would fulfill a role as protector of the Bonaparte family for some years. Napoleon’s noble, moderately affluent background afforded him greater opportunities to study than were available to a typical Corsican of the time.[24]
Statue of Napoleon as a schoolboy in Brienne, aged 15, by Louis Rochet [fr] (1853)
When he turned 9 years old,[25][26] he moved to the French mainland and enrolled at a religious school in Autun in January 1779. In May, he transferred with a scholarship to a military academy at Brienne-le-Château.[27] In his youth he was an outspoken Corsican nationalist and supported the state’s independence from France.[25][28] Like many Corsicans, Napoleon spoke and read Corsican (as his mother tongue) and Italian (as the official language of Corsica).[29][30][31][28] He began learning French in school at around age 10.[32] Although he became fluent in French, he spoke with a distinctive Corsican accent and never learned how to spell correctly in French.[33] Consequently, Napoleon was treated unfairly by his schoolmates.[28] He was, however, not an isolated case, as it was estimated in 1790 that fewer than 3 million people, out of France’s population of 28 million, were able to speak standard French, and those who could write it were even fewer.[34]
Napoleon was routinely bullied by his peers for his accent, birthplace, short stature, mannerisms and inability to speak French quickly.[30] He became reserved and melancholy, applying himself to reading. An examiner observed that Napoleon «has always been distinguished for his application in mathematics. He is fairly well acquainted with history and geography … This boy would make an excellent sailor».[f][36]
One story told of Napoleon at the school is that he led junior students to victory against senior students in a snowball fight, showing his leadership abilities.[37] In early adulthood, Napoleon briefly intended to become a writer; he authored a history of Corsica and a romantic novella.[25]
On completion of his studies at Brienne in 1784, Napoleon was admitted to the École Militaire in Paris. He trained to become an artillery officer and, when his father’s death reduced his income, was forced to complete the two-year course in one year.[38] He was the first Corsican to graduate from the École Militaire.[38] He was examined by the famed scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace.[39]
Early career
Upon graduating in September 1785, Bonaparte was commissioned a second lieutenant in La Fère artillery regiment.[g][27] He served in Valence and Auxonne until after the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789. Bonaparte was a fervent Corsican nationalist during this period.[41] He asked for leave to join his mentor Pasquale Paoli, when Paoli was allowed to return to Corsica by the National Assembly. Paoli had no sympathy for Napoleon, however, as he deemed his father a traitor for having deserted his cause for Corsican independence.[42]
He spent the early years of the Revolution in Corsica, fighting in a complex three-way struggle among royalists, revolutionaries, and Corsican nationalists. Napoleon came to embrace the ideals of the Revolution, becoming a supporter of the Jacobins and joining the pro-French Corsican Republicans who opposed Paoli’s policy and his aspirations of secession.[43] He was given command over a battalion of volunteers and was promoted to captain in the regular army in July 1792, despite exceeding his leave of absence and leading a riot against French troops.[44]
When Corsica declared formal secession from France and requested the protection of the British government, Napoleon and his commitment to the French Revolution came into conflict with Paoli, who had decided to sabotage the Corsican contribution to the Expédition de Sardaigne, by preventing a French assault on the Sardinian island of La Maddalena.[45] Bonaparte and his family were compelled to flee to Toulon on the French mainland in June 1793 because of the split with Paoli.[46]
Although he was born «Napoleone Buonaparte», it was after this that Napoleon began styling himself «Napoléon Bonaparte». His family did not drop the name Buonaparte until 1796. The first known record of him signing his name as Bonaparte was at the age of 27 (in 1796).[47][16][48]
Siege of Toulon
In July 1793, Bonaparte published a pro-republican pamphlet entitled Le souper de Beaucaire (Supper at Beaucaire) which gained him the support of Augustin Robespierre, the younger brother of the Revolutionary leader Maximilien Robespierre. With the help of his fellow Corsican Antoine Christophe Saliceti, Bonaparte was appointed senior gunner and artillery commander of the republican forces which arrived on 8 September at Toulon.[49][50]
He adopted a plan to capture a hill where republican guns could dominate the city’s harbour and force the British to evacuate. The assault on the position led to the capture of the city, and during it Bonaparte was wounded in the thigh on 16 December. Catching the attention of the Committee of Public Safety, he was put in charge of the artillery of France’s Army of Italy.[51] On 22 December he was on his way to his new post in Nice, promoted from the rank of colonel to brigadier general at the age of 24. He devised plans for attacking the Kingdom of Sardinia as part of France’s campaign against the First Coalition.
The French army carried out Bonaparte’s plan in the Battle of Saorgio in April 1794, and then advanced to seize Ormea in the mountains. From Ormea, they headed west to outflank the Austro-Sardinian positions around Saorge. After this campaign, Augustin Robespierre sent Bonaparte on a mission to the Republic of Genoa to determine that country’s intentions towards France.[52]
13 Vendémiaire
Some contemporaries alleged that Bonaparte was put under house arrest at Nice for his association with the Robespierres following their fall in the Thermidorian Reaction in July 1794. Napoleon’s secretary Bourrienne disputed the allegation in his memoirs. According to Bourrienne, jealousy was responsible, between the Army of the Alps and the Army of Italy, with whom Napoleon was seconded at the time.[53] Bonaparte dispatched an impassioned defence in a letter to the commissar Saliceti, and he was acquitted of any wrongdoing.[54] He was released within two weeks (on 20 August) and due to his technical skills, was asked to draw up plans to attack Italian positions in the context of France’s war with Austria. He also took part in an expedition to take back Corsica from the British, but the French were repulsed by the British Royal Navy.[55]
By 1795, Bonaparte had become engaged to Désirée Clary, daughter of François Clary. Désirée’s sister Julie Clary had married Bonaparte’s elder brother Joseph.[56] In April 1795, he was assigned to the Army of the West, which was engaged in the War in the Vendée—a civil war and royalist counter-revolution in Vendée, a region in west-central France on the Atlantic Ocean. As an infantry command, it was a demotion from artillery general—for which the army already had a full quota—and he pleaded poor health to avoid the posting.[57]
He was moved to the Bureau of Topography of the Committee of Public Safety. He sought unsuccessfully to be transferred to Constantinople in order to offer his services to the Sultan.[58] During this period, he wrote the romantic novella Clisson et Eugénie, about a soldier and his lover, in a clear parallel to Bonaparte’s own relationship with Désirée.[59] On 15 September, Bonaparte was removed from the list of generals in regular service for his refusal to serve in the Vendée campaign. He faced a difficult financial situation and reduced career prospects.[60]
On 3 October, royalists in Paris declared a rebellion against the National Convention.[61] Paul Barras, a leader of the Thermidorian Reaction, knew of Bonaparte’s military exploits at Toulon and gave him command of the improvised forces in defence of the convention in the Tuileries Palace. Napoleon had seen the massacre of the King’s Swiss Guard there three years earlier and realized that artillery would be the key to its defence.[27]
He ordered a young cavalry officer named Joachim Murat to seize large cannons and used them to repel the attackers on 5 October 1795—13 Vendémiaire An IV in the French Republican Calendar. 1,400 royalists died and the rest fled.[61] He cleared the streets with «a whiff of grapeshot», according to 19th-century historian Thomas Carlyle in The French Revolution: A History.[62][63]
The defeat of the royalist insurrection extinguished the threat to the Convention and earned Bonaparte sudden fame, wealth, and the patronage of the new government, the Directory. Murat married one of Napoleon’s sisters, becoming his brother-in-law; he also served under Napoleon as one of his generals. Bonaparte was promoted to Commander of the Interior and given command of the Army of Italy.[46]
Within weeks, he was romantically involved with Joséphine de Beauharnais, the former mistress of Barras. The couple married on 9 March 1796 in a civil ceremony.[64]
First Italian campaign
Two days after the marriage, Bonaparte left Paris to take command of the Army of Italy. He immediately went on the offensive, hoping to defeat the forces of Piedmont before their Austrian allies could intervene. In a series of rapid victories during the Montenotte Campaign, he knocked Piedmont out of the war in two weeks. The French then focused on the Austrians for the remainder of the war, the highlight of which became the protracted struggle for Mantua. The Austrians launched a series of offensives against the French to break the siege, but Napoleon defeated every relief effort, scoring victories at the battles of Castiglione, Bassano, Arcole, and Rivoli. The decisive French triumph at Rivoli in January 1797 led to the collapse of the Austrian position in Italy. At Rivoli, the Austrians lost up to 14,000 men while the French lost about 5,000.[65]
The next phase of the campaign featured the French invasion of the Habsburg heartlands. French forces in Southern Germany had been defeated by the Archduke Charles in 1796, but the Archduke withdrew his forces to protect Vienna after learning about Napoleon’s assault. In the first encounter between the two commanders, Napoleon pushed back his opponent and advanced deep into Austrian territory after winning at the Battle of Tarvis in March 1797. The Austrians were alarmed by the French thrust that reached all the way to Leoben, about 100 km from Vienna, and decided to sue for peace.[66]
The Treaty of Leoben, followed by the more comprehensive Treaty of Campo Formio, gave France control of most of northern Italy and the Low Countries, and a secret clause promised the Republic of Venice to Austria. Bonaparte marched on Venice and forced its surrender, ending 1,100 years of Venetian independence. He authorized the French to loot treasures such as the Horses of Saint Mark.[67]
On the journey, Bonaparte conversed much about the warriors of antiquity, especially Alexander, Caesar, Scipio and Hannibal. He studied their strategy and combined it with his own. In a question from Bourrienne, asking whether he gave his preference to Alexander or Caesar, Napoleon said that he places Alexander the Great in the first rank, the main reason being his campaign in Asia.[68]
Bonaparte during the Italian campaign in 1797
His application of conventional military ideas to real-world situations enabled his military triumphs, such as creative use of artillery as a mobile force to support his infantry. He stated later in life:[when?] «I have fought sixty battles and I have learned nothing which I did not know at the beginning. Look at Caesar; he fought the first like the last».[69]
Bonaparte could win battles by concealment of troop deployments and concentration of his forces on the «hinge» of an enemy’s weakened front. If he could not use his favourite envelopment strategy, he would take up the central position and attack two co-operating forces at their hinge, swing round to fight one until it fled, then turn to face the other.[70] In this Italian campaign, Bonaparte’s army captured 150,000 prisoners, 540 cannons, and 170 standards.[71] The French army fought 67 actions and won 18 pitched battles through superior artillery technology and Bonaparte’s tactics.[72]
During the campaign, Bonaparte became increasingly influential in French politics. He founded two newspapers: one for the troops in his army and another for circulation in France.[73] The royalists attacked Bonaparte for looting Italy and warned that he might become a dictator.[74] Napoleon’s forces extracted an estimated $45 million in funds from Italy during their campaign there, another $12 million in precious metals and jewels. His forces confiscated more than 300 priceless paintings and sculptures.[75]
Bonaparte sent General Pierre Augereau to Paris to lead a coup d’état and purge the royalists on 4 September—the Coup of 18 Fructidor. This left Barras and his Republican allies in control again but dependent upon Bonaparte, who proceeded to peace negotiations with Austria. These negotiations resulted in the Treaty of Campo Formio. Bonaparte returned to Paris in December 1797 as a hero.[76] He met Talleyrand, France’s new Foreign Minister—who served in the same capacity for Emperor Napoleon—and they began to prepare for an invasion of Britain.[46]
Egyptian expedition
After two months of planning, Bonaparte decided that France’s naval strength was not yet sufficient to confront the British Royal Navy. He decided on a military expedition to seize Egypt and thereby undermine Britain’s access to its trade interests in India.[46] Bonaparte wished to establish a French presence in the Middle East and join forces with Tipu Sultan, the Sultan of Mysore who was an enemy of the British.[77] Napoleon assured the Directory that «as soon as he had conquered Egypt, he will establish relations with the Indian princes and, together with them, attack the English in their possessions».[78] The Directory agreed in order to secure a trade route to the Indian subcontinent.[79]
In May 1798, Bonaparte was elected a member of the French Academy of Sciences. His Egyptian expedition included a group of 167 scientists, with mathematicians, naturalists, chemists, and geodesists among them. Their discoveries included the Rosetta Stone, and their work was published in the Description de l’Égypte in 1809.[80]
En route to Egypt, Bonaparte reached Malta on 9 June 1798, then controlled by the Knights Hospitaller. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch zu Bolheim surrendered after token resistance, and Bonaparte captured an important naval base with the loss of only three men.[81]
Bonaparte and his expedition eluded pursuit by the Royal Navy and landed at Alexandria on 1 July.[46] He fought the Battle of Shubra Khit against the Mamluks, Egypt’s ruling military caste. This helped the French practise their defensive tactic for the Battle of the Pyramids, fought on 21 July, about 24 km (15 mi) from the pyramids. General Bonaparte’s forces of 25,000 roughly equalled those of the Mamluks’ Egyptian cavalry. Twenty-nine French[82] and approximately 2,000 Egyptians were killed. The victory boosted the morale of the French army.[83]
On 1 August 1798, the British fleet under Sir Horatio Nelson captured or destroyed all but two vessels of the French fleet in the Battle of the Nile, defeating Bonaparte’s goal to strengthen the French position in the Mediterranean.[84] His army had succeeded in a temporary increase of French power in Egypt, though it faced repeated uprisings.[85] In early 1799, he moved an army into the Ottoman province of Damascus (Syria and Galilee). Bonaparte led these 13,000 French soldiers in the conquest of the coastal towns of Arish, Gaza, Jaffa, and Haifa.[86] The attack on Jaffa was particularly brutal. Bonaparte discovered that many of the defenders were former prisoners of war, ostensibly on parole, so he ordered the garrison and some 1,500–2,000 prisoners to be executed by bayonet or drowning.[87] Men, women, and children were robbed and murdered for three days.[88]
Bonaparte began with an army of 13,000 men. 1,500 were reported missing, 1,200 died in combat, and thousands perished from disease—mostly bubonic plague. He failed to reduce the fortress of Acre, so he marched his army back to Egypt in May. To speed up the retreat, Bonaparte ordered plague-stricken men to be poisoned with opium. The number who died remains disputed, ranging from a low of 30 to a high of 580. He also brought out 1,000 wounded men.[89] Back in Egypt on 25 July, Bonaparte defeated an Ottoman amphibious invasion at Abukir.[90]
Ruler of France
General Bonaparte surrounded by members of the Council of Five Hundred during the Coup of 18 Brumaire, by François Bouchot
While in Egypt, Bonaparte stayed informed of European affairs. He learned that France had suffered a series of defeats in the War of the Second Coalition.[91] On 24 August 1799, fearing that the Republic’s future was in doubt, he took advantage of the temporary departure of British ships from French coastal ports and set sail for France, despite the fact that he had received no explicit orders from Paris.[92] The army was left in the charge of Jean-Baptiste Kléber.[93]
Unknown to Bonaparte, the Directory had sent him orders to return to ward off possible invasions of French soil, but poor lines of communication prevented the delivery of these messages.[91] By the time that he reached Paris in October, France’s situation had been improved by a series of victories. The Republic, however, was bankrupt and the ineffective Directory was unpopular with the French population.[94] The Directory discussed Bonaparte’s «desertion» but was too weak to punish him.[91]
Despite the failures in Egypt, Napoleon returned to a hero’s welcome. He drew together an alliance with director Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, his brother Lucien, speaker of the Council of Five Hundred Roger Ducos, director Joseph Fouché, and Talleyrand, and they overthrew the Directory by a coup d’état on 9 November 1799 («the 18th Brumaire» according to the revolutionary calendar), closing down the Council of Five Hundred. Napoleon became «first consul» for ten years, with two consuls appointed by him who had consultative voices only. His power was confirmed by the new «Constitution of the Year VIII», originally devised by Sieyès to give Napoleon a minor role, but rewritten by Napoleon, and accepted by direct popular vote (3,000,000 in favour, 1,567 opposed). The constitution preserved the appearance of a republic but, in reality, established a dictatorship.[95][96]
French Consulate
Napoleon established a political system that historian Martyn Lyons called «dictatorship by plebiscite».[97] Worried by the democratic forces unleashed by the Revolution, but unwilling to ignore them entirely, Napoleon resorted to regular electoral consultations with the French people on his road to imperial power.[97] He drafted the Constitution of the Year VIII and secured his own election as First Consul, taking up residence at the Tuileries. The constitution was approved in a rigged plebiscite held the following January, with 99.94 percent officially listed as voting «yes».[98]
Napoleon’s brother, Lucien, had falsified the returns to show that 3 million people had participated in the plebiscite. The real number was 1.5 million.[97] Political observers at the time assumed the eligible French voting public numbered about 5 million people, so the regime artificially doubled the participation rate to indicate popular enthusiasm for the consulate.[97] In the first few months of the consulate, with war in Europe still raging and internal instability still plaguing the country, Napoleon’s grip on power remained very tenuous.[99]
In the spring of 1800, Napoleon and his troops crossed the Swiss Alps into Italy, aiming to surprise the Austrian armies that had reoccupied the peninsula when Napoleon was still in Egypt.[h] After a difficult crossing over the Alps, the French army entered the plains of Northern Italy virtually unopposed.[101] While one French army approached from the north, the Austrians were busy with another stationed in Genoa, which was besieged by a substantial force. The fierce resistance of this French army, under André Masséna, gave the northern force some time to carry out their operations with little interference.[102]
After spending several days looking for each other, the two armies collided at the Battle of Marengo on 14 June. General Melas had a numerical advantage, fielding about 30,000 Austrian soldiers while Napoleon commanded 24,000 French troops.[103] The battle began favourably for the Austrians as their initial attack surprised the French and gradually drove them back. Melas stated that he had won the battle and retired to his headquarters around 3 pm, leaving his subordinates in charge of pursuing the French.[104] The French lines never broke during their tactical retreat. Napoleon constantly rode out among the troops urging them to stand and fight.[105]
Late in the afternoon, a full division under Desaix arrived on the field and reversed the tide of the battle. A series of artillery barrages and cavalry charges decimated the Austrian army, which fled over the Bormida River back to Alessandria, leaving behind 14,000 casualties.[105] The following day, the Austrian army agreed to abandon Northern Italy once more with the Convention of Alessandria, which granted them safe passage to friendly soil in exchange for their fortresses throughout the region.[105]
Although critics have blamed Napoleon for several tactical mistakes preceding the battle, they have also praised his audacity for selecting a risky campaign strategy, choosing to invade the Italian peninsula from the north when the vast majority of French invasions came from the west, near or along the coastline.[106] As David G. Chandler points out, Napoleon spent almost a year getting the Austrians out of Italy in his first campaign. In 1800, it took him only a month to achieve the same goal.[106] German strategist and field marshal Alfred von Schlieffen concluded that «Bonaparte did not annihilate his enemy but eliminated him and rendered him harmless» while attaining «the object of the campaign: the conquest of North Italy».[107]
Napoleon’s triumph at Marengo secured his political authority and boosted his popularity back home, but it did not lead to an immediate peace. Bonaparte’s brother, Joseph, led the complex negotiations in Lunéville and reported that Austria, emboldened by British support, would not acknowledge the new territory that France had acquired. As negotiations became increasingly fractious, Bonaparte gave orders to his general Moreau to strike Austria once more. Moreau and the French swept through Bavaria and scored an overwhelming victory at Hohenlinden in December 1800. As a result, the Austrians capitulated and signed the Treaty of Lunéville in February 1801. The treaty reaffirmed and expanded earlier French gains at Campo Formio.[108]
Temporary peace in Europe
After a decade of constant warfare, France and Britain signed the Treaty of Amiens in March 1802, bringing the Revolutionary Wars to an end. Amiens called for the withdrawal of British troops from recently conquered colonial territories as well as for assurances to curtail the expansionary goals of the French Republic.[102] With Europe at peace and the economy recovering, Napoleon’s popularity soared to its highest levels under the consulate, both domestically and abroad.[109] In a new plebiscite during the spring of 1802, the French public came out in huge numbers to approve a constitution that made the Consulate permanent, essentially elevating Napoleon to dictator for life.[109]
Whereas the plebiscite two years earlier had brought out 1.5 million people to the polls, the new referendum enticed 3.6 million to go and vote (72 percent of all eligible voters).[110] There was no secret ballot in 1802 and few people wanted to openly defy the regime. The constitution gained approval with over 99% of the vote.[110] His broad powers were spelled out in the new constitution: Article 1. The French people name, and the Senate proclaims Napoleon-Bonaparte First Consul for Life.[111] After 1802, he was generally referred to as Napoleon rather than Bonaparte.[40]
The 1803 Louisiana Purchase totalled 2,144,480 square kilometres (827,987 square miles), doubling the size of the United States.
The brief peace in Europe allowed Napoleon to focus on French colonies abroad. Saint-Domingue had managed to acquire a high level of political autonomy during the Revolutionary Wars, with Toussaint L’Ouverture installing himself as de facto dictator by 1801. Napoleon saw a chance to reestablish control over the colony when he signed the Treaty of Amiens. In the 18th century, Saint-Domingue had been France’s most profitable colony, producing more sugar than all the British West Indies colonies combined. However, during the Revolution, the National Convention voted to abolish slavery in February 1794.[112] Aware of the expenses required to fund his wars in Europe, Napoleon made the decision to reinstate slavery in all French Caribbean colonies. The 1794 decree had only affected the colonies of Saint-Domingue, Guadeloupe and Guiana, and did not take effect in Mauritius, Reunion and Martinique, the last of which had been captured by the British and as such remained unaffected by French law.[113]
In Guadeloupe slavery had been abolished (and its ban violently enforced) by Victor Hugues against opposition from slaveholders thanks to the 1794 law. However, when slavery was reinstated in 1802, a slave revolt broke out under the leadership of Louis Delgrès.[114] The resulting Law of 20 May had the express purpose of reinstating slavery in Saint-Domingue, Guadeloupe and French Guiana, and restored slavery throughout most of the French colonial empire (excluding Saint-Domingue) for another half a century, while the French transatlantic slave trade continued for another twenty years.[115][116][117][118][119]
Napoleon sent an expedition under his brother-in-law General Leclerc to reassert control over Saint-Domingue. Although the French managed to capture Toussaint Louverture, the expedition failed when high rates of disease crippled the French army, and Jean-Jacques Dessalines won a string of victories, first against Leclerc, and when he died from yellow fever, then against Donatien-Marie-Joseph de Vimeur, vicomte de Rochambeau, whom Napoleon sent to relieve Leclerc with another 20,000 men. In May 1803, Napoleon acknowledged defeat, and the last 8,000 French troops left the island and the slaves proclaimed an independent republic that they called Haiti in 1804. In the process, Dessalines became arguably the most successful military commander in the struggle against Napoleonic France.[120][121] Seeing the failure of his efforts in Haiti, Napoleon decided in 1803 to sell the Louisiana Territory to the United States, instantly doubling the size of the U.S. The selling price in the Louisiana Purchase was less than three cents per acre, a total of $15 million.[2][122]
The peace with Britain proved to be uneasy and controversial.[123] Britain did not evacuate Malta as promised and protested against Bonaparte’s annexation of Piedmont and his Act of Mediation, which established a new Swiss Confederation. Neither of these territories were covered by Amiens, but they inflamed tensions significantly.[124] The dispute culminated in a declaration of war by Britain in May 1803; Napoleon responded by reassembling the invasion camp at Boulogne and declaring that every British male between eighteen and sixty years old in France and its dependencies to be arrested as a prisoner of war.[125]
French Empire
During the consulate, Napoleon faced several royalist and Jacobin assassination plots, including the Conspiration des poignards (Dagger plot) in October 1800 and the Plot of the Rue Saint-Nicaise (also known as the Infernal Machine) two months later.[126] In January 1804, his police uncovered an assassination plot against him that involved Moreau and which was ostensibly sponsored by the Bourbon family, the former rulers of France. On the advice of Talleyrand, Napoleon ordered the kidnapping of the Duke of Enghien, violating the sovereignty of Baden. The Duke was quickly executed after a secret military trial, even though he had not been involved in the plot.[127] Enghien’s execution infuriated royal courts throughout Europe, becoming one of the contributing political factors for the outbreak of the Napoleonic Wars.
To expand his power, Napoleon used these assassination plots to justify the creation of an imperial system based on the Roman model. He believed that a Bourbon restoration would be more difficult if his family’s succession was entrenched in the constitution.[128] Launching yet another referendum, Napoleon was elected as Emperor of the French by a tally exceeding 99%.[110] As with the Life Consulate two years earlier, this referendum produced heavy participation, bringing out almost 3.6 million voters to the polls.[110]
A keen observer of Bonaparte’s rise to absolute power, Madame de Rémusat, explains that «men worn out by the turmoil of the Revolution […] looked for the domination of an able ruler» and that «people believed quite sincerely that Bonaparte, whether as consul or emperor, would exert his authority and save [them] from the perils of anarchy.»[129]»
Napoleon’s throne room at Fontainebleau
Napoleon’s coronation, at which Pope Pius VII officiated, took place at Notre Dame de Paris, on 2 December 1804. Two separate crowns were brought for the ceremony: a golden laurel wreath recalling the Roman Empire, and a replica of Charlemagne’s crown.[130] Napoleon entered the ceremony wearing the laurel wreath and kept it on his head throughout the proceedings.[130] For the official coronation, he raised the Charlemagne crown over his own head in a symbolic gesture, but never placed it on top because he was already wearing the golden wreath.[130] Instead he placed the crown on Josephine’s head, the event commemorated in the officially sanctioned painting by Jacques-Louis David.[130] Napoleon was crowned King of Italy, with the Iron Crown of Lombardy, at the Cathedral of Milan on 26 May 1805. He created eighteen Marshals of the Empire from among his top generals to secure the allegiance of the army on 18 May 1804, the official start of the Empire.[131]
War of the Third Coalition
Great Britain had broken the Peace of Amiens by declaring war on France in May 1803.[132] In December 1804, an Anglo-Swedish agreement became the first step towards the creation of the Third Coalition. By April 1805, Britain had also signed an alliance with Russia.[133] Austria had been defeated by France twice in recent memory and wanted revenge, so it joined the coalition a few months later.[134]
Before the formation of the Third Coalition, Napoleon had assembled an invasion force, the Armée d’Angleterre, around six camps at Boulogne in Northern France. He intended to use this invasion force to strike at England. They never invaded, but Napoleon’s troops received careful and invaluable training for future military operations.[135] The men at Boulogne formed the core for what Napoleon later called La Grande Armée. At the start, this French army had about 200,000 men organized into seven corps, which were large field units that contained 36–40 cannons each and were capable of independent action until other corps could come to the rescue.[136]
A single corps properly situated in a strong defensive position could survive at least a day without support, giving the Grande Armée countless strategic and tactical options on every campaign. On top of these forces, Napoleon created a cavalry reserve of 22,000 organized into two cuirassier divisions, four mounted dragoon divisions, one division of dismounted dragoons, and one of light cavalry, all supported by 24 artillery pieces.[137] By 1805, the Grande Armée had grown to a force of 350,000 men,[137] who were well equipped, well trained, and led by competent officers.[138]
Napoleon knew that the French fleet could not defeat the Royal Navy in a head-to-head battle, so he planned to lure it away from the English Channel through diversionary tactics.[139] The main strategic idea involved the French Navy escaping from the British blockades of Toulon and Brest and threatening to attack the British West Indies. In the face of this attack, it was hoped, the British would weaken their defence of the Western Approaches by sending ships to the Caribbean, allowing a combined Franco-Spanish fleet to take control of the English channel long enough for French armies to cross and invade.[139] However, the plan unravelled after the British victory at the Battle of Cape Finisterre in July 1805. French Admiral Villeneuve then retreated to Cádiz instead of linking up with French naval forces at Brest for an attack on the English Channel.[140]
By August 1805, Napoleon had realized that the strategic situation had changed fundamentally. Facing a potential invasion from his continental enemies, he decided to strike first and turned his army’s sights from the English Channel to the Rhine. His basic objective was to destroy the isolated Austrian armies in Southern Germany before their Russian allies could arrive. On 25 September, after great secrecy and feverish marching, 200,000 French troops began to cross the Rhine on a front of 260 km (160 mi).[141][142]
Austrian commander Karl Mack had gathered the greater part of the Austrian army at the fortress of Ulm in Swabia. Napoleon swung his forces to the southeast and the Grande Armée performed an elaborate wheeling movement that outflanked the Austrian positions. The Ulm Maneuver completely surprised General Mack, who belatedly understood that his army had been cut off. After some minor engagements that culminated in the Battle of Ulm, Mack finally surrendered after realizing that there was no way to break out of the French encirclement. For just 2,000 French casualties, Napoleon had managed to capture a total of 60,000 Austrian soldiers through his army’s rapid marching.[143] Napoleon wrote after the conflict:
«I have accomplished my object, I have destroyed the Austrian army by simply marching.»[144]
The Ulm Campaign is generally regarded as a strategic masterpiece and was influential in the development of the Schlieffen Plan in the late 19th century.[145] For the French, this spectacular victory on land was soured by the decisive victory that the Royal Navy attained at the Battle of Trafalgar on 21 October. After Trafalgar, the Royal Navy was never again seriously challenged by a French fleet in a large-scale engagement for the duration of the Napoleonic Wars.[146]
Following the Ulm Campaign, French forces managed to capture Vienna in November. The fall of Vienna provided the French a huge bounty as they captured 100,000 muskets, 500 cannons, and the intact bridges across the Danube.[147] At this critical juncture, both Tsar Alexander I and Holy Roman Emperor Francis II decided to engage Napoleon in battle, despite reservations from some of their subordinates. Napoleon sent his army north in pursuit of the Allies but then ordered his forces to retreat so that he could feign a grave weakness.[148]
Desperate to lure the Allies into battle, Napoleon gave every indication in the days preceding the engagement that the French army was in a pitiful state, even abandoning the dominant Pratzen Heights, a sloping hill near the village of Austerlitz. At the Battle of Austerlitz, in Moravia on 2 December, he deployed the French army below the Pratzen Heights and deliberately weakened his right flank, enticing the Allies to launch a major assault there in the hopes of rolling up the whole French line. A forced march from Vienna by Marshal Davout and his III Corps plugged the gap left by Napoleon just in time.[148]
Meanwhile, the heavy Allied deployment against the French right flank weakened their center on the Pratzen Heights, which was viciously attacked by the IV Corps of Marshal Soult. With the Allied center demolished, the French swept through both enemy flanks and sent the Allies fleeing chaotically, capturing thousands of prisoners in the process. The battle is often seen as a tactical masterpiece because of the near-perfect execution of a calibrated but dangerous plan—of the same stature as Cannae, the celebrated triumph by Hannibal some 2,000 years before.[148]
The Allied disaster at Austerlitz significantly shook the faith of Emperor Francis in the British-led war effort. France and Austria agreed to an armistice immediately and the Treaty of Pressburg followed shortly after on 26 December. Pressburg took Austria out of both the war and the Coalition while reinforcing the earlier treaties of Campo Formio and of Lunéville between the two powers. The treaty confirmed the Austrian loss of lands to France in Italy and Bavaria, and lands in Germany to Napoleon’s German allies.[149]
It imposed an indemnity of 40 million francs on the defeated Habsburgs and allowed the fleeing Russian troops free passage through hostile territories and back to their home soil. Napoleon went on to say, «The battle of Austerlitz is the finest of all I have fought».[150] Frank McLynn suggests that Napoleon was so successful at Austerlitz that he lost touch with reality, and what used to be French foreign policy became a «personal Napoleonic one».[151] Vincent Cronin disagrees, stating that Napoleon was not overly ambitious for himself, «he embodied the ambitions of thirty million Frenchmen».[152]
Middle-Eastern alliances
Napoleon continued to entertain a grand scheme to establish a French presence in the Middle East in order to put pressure on Britain and Russia, and perhaps form an alliance with the Ottoman Empire.[77] In February 1806, Ottoman Emperor Selim III recognised Napoleon as Emperor. He also opted for an alliance with France, calling France «our sincere and natural ally».[153] That decision brought the Ottoman Empire into a losing war against Russia and Britain. A Franco-Persian alliance was formed between Napoleon and the Persian Empire of Fat′h-Ali Shah Qajar. It collapsed in 1807 when France and Russia formed an unexpected alliance.[77] In the end, Napoleon had made no effective alliances in the Middle East.[154]
War of the Fourth Coalition and Tilsit
After Austerlitz, Napoleon established the Confederation of the Rhine in 1806. A collection of German states intended to serve as a buffer zone between France and Central Europe, the creation of the Confederation spelled the end of the Holy Roman Empire and significantly alarmed the Prussians. The brazen reorganization of German territory by the French risked threatening Prussian influence in the region, if not eliminating it outright. War fever in Berlin rose steadily throughout the summer of 1806. At the insistence of his court, especially his wife Queen Louise, Frederick William III decided to challenge the French domination of Central Europe by going to war.[155]
The initial military manoeuvres began in September 1806. In a letter to Marshal Soult detailing the plan for the campaign, Napoleon described the essential features of Napoleonic warfare and introduced the phrase le bataillon-carré («square battalion»).[156] In the bataillon-carré system, the various corps of the Grande Armée would march uniformly together in close supporting distance.[156] If any single corps was attacked, the others could quickly spring into action and arrive to help.[157]
Napoleon invaded Prussia with 180,000 troops, rapidly marching on the right bank of the River Saale. As in previous campaigns, his fundamental objective was to destroy one opponent before reinforcements from another could tip the balance of the war. Upon learning the whereabouts of the Prussian army, the French swung westwards and crossed the Saale with overwhelming force. At the twin battles of Jena and Auerstedt, fought on 14 October, the French convincingly defeated the Prussians and inflicted heavy casualties. With several major commanders dead or incapacitated, the Prussian king proved incapable of effectively commanding the army, which began to quickly disintegrate.[157]
In a vaunted pursuit that epitomized the «peak of Napoleonic warfare», according to historian Richard Brooks,[157] the French managed to capture 140,000 soldiers, over 2,000 cannons and hundreds of ammunition wagons, all in a single month. Historian David Chandler wrote of the Prussian forces: «Never has the morale of any army been more completely shattered».[156] Despite their overwhelming defeat, the Prussians refused to negotiate with the French until the Russians had an opportunity to enter the fight.
Following his triumph, Napoleon imposed the first elements of the Continental System through the Berlin Decree issued in November 1806. The Continental System, which prohibited European nations from trading with Britain, was widely violated throughout his reign.[158][159] In the next few months, Napoleon marched against the advancing Russian armies through Poland and was involved in the bloody stalemate at the Battle of Eylau in February 1807.[160] After a period of rest and consolidation on both sides, the war restarted in June with an initial struggle at Heilsberg that proved indecisive.[161]
On 14 June Napoleon obtained an overwhelming victory over the Russians at the Battle of Friedland, wiping out the majority of the Russian army in a very bloody struggle. The scale of their defeat convinced the Russians to make peace with the French. On 19 June, Tsar Alexander sent an envoy to seek an armistice with Napoleon. The latter assured the envoy that the Vistula River represented the natural borders between French and Russian influence in Europe. On that basis, the two emperors began peace negotiations at the town of Tilsit after meeting on an iconic raft on the River Niemen. The very first thing Alexander said to Napoleon was probably well-calibrated: «I hate the English as much as you do».[161] Their meeting lasted two hours. Despite waging wars against each other the two Emperors were very much impressed and fascinated by one another. “Never,” said Alexander afterward, “did I love any man as I loved that man.”[162]
Alexander faced pressure from his brother, Duke Constantine, to make peace with Napoleon. Given the victory he had just achieved, the French emperor offered the Russians relatively lenient terms—demanding that Russia join the Continental System, withdraw its forces from Wallachia and Moldavia, and hand over the Ionian Islands to France.[163] By contrast, Napoleon dictated very harsh peace terms for Prussia, despite the ceaseless exhortations of Queen Louise. Wiping out half of Prussian territories from the map, Napoleon created a new kingdom of 2,800 square kilometres (1,100 sq mi) called Westphalia and appointed his young brother Jérôme as its monarch.[164]
Prussia’s humiliating treatment at Tilsit caused a deep and bitter antagonism that festered as the Napoleonic era progressed. Moreover, Alexander’s pretensions at friendship with Napoleon led the latter to seriously misjudge the true intentions of his Russian counterpart, who would violate numerous provisions of the treaty in the next few years. Despite these problems, the Treaties of Tilsit at last gave Napoleon a respite from war and allowed him to return to France, which he had not seen in over 300 days.[164]
Peninsular War and Erfurt
The settlements at Tilsit gave Napoleon time to organize his empire. One of his major objectives became enforcing the Continental System against the British forces. He decided to focus his attention on the Kingdom of Portugal, which consistently violated his trade prohibitions. After defeat in the War of the Oranges in 1801, Portugal adopted a double-sided policy.
Unhappy with this change of policy by the Portuguese government, Napoleon negotiated a secret treaty with Charles IV of Spain and sent an army to invade Portugal.[165] On 17 October 1807, 24,000 French troops under General Junot crossed the Pyrenees with Spanish cooperation and headed towards Portugal to enforce Napoleon’s orders.[166] This attack was the first step in what would eventually become the Peninsular War, a six-year struggle that significantly sapped French strength. Throughout the winter of 1808, French agents became increasingly involved in Spanish internal affairs, attempting to incite discord between members of the Spanish royal family. On 16 February 1808, secret French machinations finally materialized when Napoleon announced that he would intervene to mediate between the rival political factions in the country.[167]
Marshal Murat led 120,000 troops into Spain. The French arrived in Madrid on 24 March,[168] where wild riots against the occupation erupted just a few weeks later. Napoleon appointed his brother, Joseph Bonaparte, as the new King of Spain in the summer of 1808. The appointment enraged a heavily religious and conservative Spanish population. Resistance to French aggression soon spread throughout Spain. The shocking French defeats at the Battle of Bailén and the Battle of Vimiero gave hope to Napoleon’s enemies and partly persuaded the French emperor to intervene in person.[169]
Before going to Iberia, Napoleon decided to address several lingering issues with the Russians. At the Congress of Erfurt in October 1808, Napoleon hoped to keep Russia on his side during the upcoming struggle in Spain and during any potential conflict against Austria. The two sides reached an agreement, the Erfurt Convention, that called upon Britain to cease its war against France, that recognized the Russian conquest of Finland from Sweden and made it an autonomous Grand Duchy,[170] and that affirmed Russian support for France in a possible war against Austria «to the best of its ability».[171]
Napoleon then returned to France and prepared for war. The Grande Armée, under the Emperor’s personal command, rapidly crossed the Ebro River in November 1808 and inflicted a series of crushing defeats against the Spanish forces. After clearing the last Spanish force guarding the capital at Somosierra, Napoleon entered Madrid on 4 December with 80,000 troops.[172] He then unleashed his soldiers against Moore and the British forces. The British were swiftly driven to the coast, and they withdrew from Spain entirely after a last stand at the Battle of Corunna in January 1809 and the death of Moore.[173]
Napoleon accepting the surrender of Madrid, 4 December 1808
Napoleon would end up leaving Iberia in order to deal with the Austrians in Central Europe, but the Peninsular War continued on long after his absence. He never returned to Spain after the 1808 campaign. Several months after Corunna, the British sent another army to the peninsula under Arthur Wellesley, the future Duke of Wellington. The war then settled into a complex and asymmetric strategic deadlock where all sides struggled to gain the upper hand. The highlight of the conflict became the brutal guerrilla warfare that engulfed much of the Spanish countryside. Both sides committed the worst atrocities of the Napoleonic Wars during this phase of the conflict.[174]
The vicious guerrilla fighting in Spain, largely absent from the French campaigns in Central Europe, severely disrupted the French lines of supply and communication. Although France maintained roughly 300,000 troops in Iberia during the Peninsular War, the vast majority were tied down to garrison duty and to intelligence operations.[174] The French were never able to concentrate all of their forces effectively, prolonging the war until events elsewhere in Europe finally turned the tide in favour of the Allies. After the invasion of Russia in 1812, the number of French troops in Spain vastly declined as Napoleon needed reinforcements to conserve his strategic position in Europe. By 1814 the Allies had pushed the French out of the peninsula.
The impact of the Napoleonic invasion of Spain and ousting of the Spanish Bourbon monarchy in favour of his brother Joseph had an enormous impact on the Spanish empire. In Spanish America many local elites formed juntas and set up mechanisms to rule in the name of Ferdinand VII of Spain, whom they considered the legitimate Spanish monarch. The outbreak of the Spanish American wars of independence in most of the empire was a result of Napoleon’s destabilizing actions in Spain and led to the rise of strongmen in the wake of these wars.[175]
War of the Fifth Coalition and Marie Louise
After four years on the sidelines, Austria sought another war with France to avenge its recent defeats. Austria could not count on Russian support because the latter was at war with Britain, Sweden, and the Ottoman Empire in 1809. Frederick William of Prussia initially promised to help the Austrians but reneged before conflict began.[176] A report from the Austrian finance minister suggested that the treasury would run out of money by the middle of 1809 if the large army that the Austrians had formed since the Third Coalition remained mobilized.[176] Although Archduke Charles warned that the Austrians were not ready for another showdown with Napoleon, a stance that landed him in the so-called «peace party», he did not want to see the army demobilized either.[176] On 8 February 1809, the advocates for war finally succeeded when the Imperial Government secretly decided on another confrontation against the French.[177]
In the early morning of 10 April, leading elements of the Austrian army crossed the Inn River and invaded Bavaria. The early Austrian attack surprised the French; Napoleon himself was still in Paris when he heard about the invasion. He arrived at Donauwörth on the 17th to find the Grande Armée in a dangerous position, with its two wings separated by 120 km (75 mi) and joined by a thin cordon of Bavarian troops. Charles pressed the left wing of the French army and hurled his men towards the III Corps of Marshal Davout.[178]
In response, Napoleon came up with a plan to cut off the Austrians in the celebrated Landshut Maneuver.[179] He realigned the axis of his army and marched his soldiers towards the town of Eckmühl. The French scored a convincing win in the resulting Battle of Eckmühl, forcing Charles to withdraw his forces over the Danube and into Bohemia. On 13 May, Vienna fell for the second time in four years, although the war continued since most of the Austrian army had survived the initial engagements in Southern Germany.
On 21 May, the French made their first major effort to cross the Danube, precipitating the Battle of Aspern-Essling. The battle was characterized by a vicious back-and-forth struggle for the two villages of Aspern and Essling, the focal points of the French bridgehead. A sustained Austrian artillery bombardment eventually convinced Napoleon to withdraw his forces back onto Lobau Island. Both sides inflicted about 23,000 casualties on each other.[180] It was the first defeat Napoleon suffered in a major set-piece battle, and it caused excitement throughout many parts of Europe because it proved that he could be beaten on the battlefield.[181]
After the setback at Aspern-Essling, Napoleon took more than six weeks in planning and preparing for contingencies before he made another attempt at crossing the Danube.[182] From 30 June to the early days of July, the French recrossed the Danube in strength, with more than 180,000 troops marching across the Marchfeld towards the Austrians.[182] Charles received the French with 150,000 of his own men.[183] In the ensuing Battle of Wagram, which also lasted two days, Napoleon commanded his forces in what was the largest battle of his career up until then. Napoleon finished off the battle with a concentrated central thrust that punctured a hole in the Austrian army and forced Charles to retreat. Austrian losses were very heavy, reaching well over 40,000 casualties.[184] The French were too exhausted to pursue the Austrians immediately, but Napoleon eventually caught up with Charles at Znaim and the latter signed an armistice on 12 July.
In the Kingdom of Holland, the British launched the Walcheren Campaign to open up a second front in the war and to relieve the pressure on the Austrians. The British army only landed at Walcheren on 30 July, by which point the Austrians had already been defeated. The Walcheren Campaign was characterized by little fighting but heavy casualties thanks to the popularly dubbed «Walcheren Fever». Over 4,000 British troops were lost in a bungled campaign, and the rest withdrew in December 1809.[185] The main strategic result from the campaign became the delayed political settlement between the French and the Austrians. Emperor Francis waited to see how the British performed in their theatre before entering into negotiations with Napoleon. Once it became apparent the British were going nowhere, the Austrians agreed to peace talks.[citation needed]
The resulting Treaty of Schönbrunn in October 1809 was the harshest that France had imposed on Austria in recent memory. Metternich and Archduke Charles had the preservation of the Habsburg Empire as their fundamental goal, and to this end, they succeeded by making Napoleon seek more modest goals in return for promises of friendship between the two powers.[186] While most of the hereditary lands remained a part of the Habsburg realm, France received Carinthia, Carniola, and the Adriatic ports, while Galicia was given to the Poles and the Salzburg area of the Tyrol went to the Bavarians.[186] Austria lost over three million subjects, about one-fifth of her total population, as a result of these territorial changes.[187]
Napoleon turned his focus to domestic affairs after the war. Empress Joséphine had still not given birth to a child from Napoleon, who became worried about the future of his empire following his death. Desperate for a legitimate heir, Napoleon divorced Joséphine on 10 January 1810 and started looking for a new wife. Hoping to cement the recent alliance with Austria through a family connection, Napoleon married the 18-year-old Archduchess Marie Louise, daughter of Emperor Francis II. On 20 March 1811, Marie Louise gave birth to a baby boy, whom Napoleon made heir apparent and bestowed the title of King of Rome. His son never actually ruled the empire, but given his brief titular rule and cousin Louis-Napoléon’s subsequent naming himself Napoléon III, historians often refer to him as Napoleon II.[188]
Invasion of Russia
In 1808, Napoleon and Tsar Alexander met at the Congress of Erfurt to preserve the Russo-French alliance. The leaders had a friendly personal relationship after their first meeting at Tilsit in 1807.[189] By 1811, however, tensions had increased, a strain on the relationship became the regular violations of the Continental System by the Russians as their economy was failing, which led Napoleon to threaten Alexander with serious consequences if he formed an alliance with Britain.[190]
By 1812, advisers to Alexander suggested the possibility of an invasion of the French Empire and the recapture of Poland. On receipt of intelligence reports on Russia’s war preparations, Napoleon expanded his Grande Armée to more than 450,000 men.[191] He ignored repeated advice against an invasion of the Russian heartland and prepared for an offensive campaign; on 24 June 1812 the invasion commenced.[192]
In an attempt to gain increased support from Polish nationalists and patriots, Napoleon termed the war the Second Polish War—the First Polish War had been the Bar Confederation uprising by Polish nobles against Russia in 1768. Polish patriots wanted the Russian part of Poland to be joined with the Duchy of Warsaw and an independent Poland created. This was rejected by Napoleon, who stated he had promised his ally Austria this would not happen. Napoleon refused to manumit the Russian serfs because of concerns this might provoke a reaction in his army’s rear. The serfs later committed atrocities against French soldiers during France’s retreat.[193]
The Russians avoided Napoleon’s objective of a decisive engagement and instead retreated deeper into Russia. A brief attempt at resistance was made at Smolensk in August; the Russians were defeated in a series of battles, and Napoleon resumed his advance. The Russians again avoided battle, although in a few cases this was only achieved because Napoleon uncharacteristically hesitated to attack when the opportunity arose. Owing to the Russian army’s scorched earth tactics, the French found it increasingly difficult to forage food for themselves and their horses.[194]
The Russians eventually offered battle outside Moscow on 7 September: the Battle of Borodino resulted in approximately 44,000 Russian and 35,000 French dead, wounded or captured, and may have been the bloodiest day of battle in history up to that point in time.[195] Although the French had won, the Russian army had accepted, and withstood, the major battle Napoleon had hoped would be decisive. Napoleon’s own account was: «The most terrible of all my battles was the one before Moscow. The French showed themselves to be worthy of victory, but the Russians showed themselves worthy of being invincible».[196]
The Russian army withdrew and retreated past Moscow. Napoleon entered the city, assuming its fall would end the war and Alexander would negotiate peace. Moscow was burned, rather than surrendered, on the order of Moscow’s governor Feodor Rostopchin. After five weeks, Napoleon and his army left. In early November Napoleon became concerned about the loss of control back in France after the Malet coup of 1812. His army walked through snow up to their knees, and nearly 10,000 men and horses froze to death on the night of 8/9 November alone. After the Battle of Berezina Napoleon managed to escape but had to abandon much of the remaining artillery and baggage train. On 5 December, shortly before arriving in Vilnius, Napoleon left the army in a sledge.[197]
The French suffered in the course of a ruinous retreat, including from the harshness of the Russian Winter. The Armée had begun as over 400,000 frontline troops, with fewer than 40,000 crossing the Berezina River in November 1812.[198] The Russians had lost 150,000 soldiers in battle and hundreds of thousands of civilians.[199]
War of the Sixth Coalition
There was a lull in fighting over the winter of 1812–13 while both the Russians and the French rebuilt their forces; Napoleon was able to field 350,000 troops.[200] Heartened by France’s loss in Russia, Prussia joined with Austria, Sweden, Russia, Great Britain, Spain, and Portugal in a new coalition. Napoleon assumed command in Germany and inflicted a series of defeats on the Coalition culminating in the Battle of Dresden in August 1813.[201]
Despite these successes, the numbers continued to mount against Napoleon, and the French army was pinned down by a force twice its size and lost at the Battle of Leipzig. This was by far the largest battle of the Napoleonic Wars and cost more than 90,000 casualties in total.[202]
The Allies offered peace terms in the Frankfurt proposals in November 1813. Napoleon would remain as Emperor of the French, but it would be reduced to its «natural frontiers». That meant that France could retain control of Belgium, Savoy and the Rhineland (the west bank of the Rhine River), while giving up control of all the rest, including all of Spain and the Netherlands, and most of Italy and Germany. Metternich told Napoleon these were the best terms the Allies were likely to offer; after further victories, the terms would be harsher and harsher. Metternich’s motivation was to maintain France as a balance against Russian threats while ending the highly destabilizing series of wars.[203]
Napoleon, expecting to win the war, delayed too long and lost this opportunity; by December the Allies had withdrawn the offer. When his back was to the wall in 1814 he tried to reopen peace negotiations on the basis of accepting the Frankfurt proposals. The Allies now had new, harsher terms that included the retreat of France to its 1791 boundaries, which meant the loss of Belgium, but Napoleon would remain Emperor. However, he rejected the term. The British wanted Napoleon permanently removed, and they prevailed, though Napoleon adamantly refused.[203][204]
Napoleon after his abdication in Fontainebleau, 4 April 1814, by Paul Delaroche
Napoleon withdrew into France, his army reduced to 70,000 soldiers and little cavalry; he faced more than three times as many Allied troops.[205] Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s older brother, abdicated as king of Spain on 13 December 1813 and assumed the title of lieutenant general to save the collapsing empire. The French were surrounded: British armies pressed from the south, and other Coalition forces positioned to attack from the German states. By the middle of January 1814, the Coalition had already entered France’s borders and launched a two-pronged attack on Paris, with Prussia entering from the north, and Austria from the East, marching out of the capitulated Swiss confederation. The French Empire, however, would not go down so easily. Napoleon launched a series of victories in the Six Days’ Campaign. While they repulsed the coalition forces and delayed the capture of Paris by at least a full month, these were not significant enough to turn the tide. The coalitionaries camped on the outskirts of the capital on 29 March. A day later, they advanced onto the demoralised soldiers protecting the city. Joseph Bonaparte led a final battle at the gates of Paris. They were greatly outnumbered, as 30,000 French soldiers were pitted against a combined coalition force that was 5 times greater than theirs. They were defeated, and Joseph retreated out of the city. The leaders of Paris surrendered to the Coalition on the last day of March 1814.[206] On 1 April, Alexander addressed the Sénat conservateur. Long docile to Napoleon, under Talleyrand’s prodding it had turned against him. Alexander told the Sénat that the Allies were fighting against Napoleon, not France, and they were prepared to offer honourable peace terms if Napoleon were removed from power. The next day, the Sénat passed the Acte de déchéance de l’Empereur («Emperor’s Demise Act»), which declared Napoleon deposed.
Napoleon had advanced as far as Fontainebleau when he learned that Paris had fallen. When Napoleon proposed the army march on the capital, his senior officers and marshals mutinied.[207] On 4 April, led by Ney, the senior officers confronted Napoleon. When Napoleon asserted the army would follow him, Ney replied the army would follow its generals. While the ordinary soldiers and regimental officers wanted to fight on, the senior commanders were unwilling to continue. Without any senior officers or marshals, any prospective invasion of Paris would have been impossible. Bowing to the inevitable, on 4 April Napoleon abdicated in favour of his son, with Marie Louise as regent. However, the Allies refused to accept this under prodding from Alexander, who feared that Napoleon might find an excuse to retake the throne.[208][209] Napoleon was then forced to announce his unconditional abdication only two days later.[209]
In his farewell address to the soldiers of Old Guard in 20 April, Napoleon said:
«Soldiers of my Old Guard, I have come to bid you farewell. For twenty years you have accompanied me faithfully on the paths of honor and glory. …With men like you, our cause was [not] lost, but the war would have dragged on interminably, and it would have been a civil war. … So I am sacrificing our interests to those of our country. …Do not lament my fate; if I have agreed to live on, it is to serve our glory. I wish to write the history of the great deeds we have done together. Farewell, my children!»[210]
Exile to Elba
Napoleon leaving Elba on 26 February 1815, by Joseph Beaume (1836)
The Allied Powers having declared that Emperor Napoleon was the sole obstacle to the restoration of peace in Europe, Emperor Napoleon, faithful to his oath, declares that he renounces, for himself and his heirs, the thrones of France and Italy, and that there is no personal sacrifice, even that of his life, which he is not ready to make in the interests of France.
Done in the palace of Fontainebleau, 11 April 1814.— Act of abdication of Napoleon[211]
In the Treaty of Fontainebleau, the Allies exiled Napoleon to Elba, an island of 12,000 inhabitants in the Mediterranean, 10 km (6 mi) off the Tuscan coast. They gave him sovereignty over the island and allowed him to retain the title of Emperor. Napoleon attempted suicide with a pill he had carried after nearly being captured by the Russians during the retreat from Moscow. Its potency had weakened with age, however, and he survived to be exiled, while his wife and son took refuge in Austria.[212]
He was conveyed to the island on HMS Undaunted by Captain Thomas Ussher, and he arrived at Portoferraio on 30 May 1814. In the first few months on Elba he created a small navy and army, developed the iron mines, oversaw the construction of new roads, issued decrees on modern agricultural methods, and overhauled the island’s legal and educational system.[213][214]
A few months into his exile, Napoleon learned that his ex-wife Josephine had died in France. He was devastated by the news, locking himself in his room and refusing to leave for two days.[215]
Hundred Days
Separated from his wife and son, who had returned to Austria, cut off from the allowance guaranteed to him by the Treaty of Fontainebleau, and aware of rumours he was about to be banished to a remote island in the Atlantic Ocean,[216] Napoleon escaped from Elba in the brig Inconstant on 26 February 1815 with 700 men.[216] Two days later, he landed on the French mainland at Golfe-Juan and started heading north.[216]
The 5th Regiment was sent to intercept him and made contact just south of Grenoble on 7 March 1815. Napoleon approached the regiment alone, dismounted his horse and, when he was within gunshot range, shouted to the soldiers, «Here I am. Kill your Emperor, if you wish.»[217] The soldiers quickly responded with, «Vive L’Empereur!» Ney, who had boasted to the restored Bourbon king, Louis XVIII, that he would bring Napoleon to Paris in an iron cage, affectionately kissed his former emperor and forgot his oath of allegiance to the Bourbon monarch. The two then marched together toward Paris with a growing army. The unpopular Louis XVIII fled to Belgium after realizing that he had little political support. On 13 March, the powers at the Congress of Vienna declared Napoleon an outlaw. Four days later, Great Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia each pledged to put 150,000 men into the field to end his rule.[218]
Napoleon arrived in Paris on 20 March and governed for a period now called the Hundred Days. By the start of June, the armed forces available to him had reached 200,000, and he decided to go on the offensive to attempt to drive a wedge between the oncoming British and Prussian armies. The French Army of the North crossed the frontier into the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, in modern-day Belgium.[219]
Napoleon’s forces fought two Coalition armies, commanded by the British Duke of Wellington and the Prussian Prince Blücher, at the Battle of Waterloo on 18 June 1815. Wellington’s army withstood repeated attacks by the French and drove them from the field while the Prussians arrived in force and broke through Napoleon’s right flank.
Napoleon returned to Paris and found that both the legislature and the people had turned against him. Realizing that his position was untenable, he abdicated on 22 June in favour of his son. He left Paris three days later and settled at Josephine’s former palace in Malmaison (on the western bank of the Seine about 17 kilometres (11 mi) west of Paris). Even as Napoleon travelled to Paris, the Coalition forces swept through France (arriving in the vicinity of Paris on 29 June), with the stated intent of restoring Louis XVIII to the French throne.
When Napoleon heard that Prussian troops had orders to capture him dead or alive, he fled to Rochefort, considering an escape to the United States. British ships were blocking every port. Napoleon surrendered to Captain Frederick Maitland on HMS Bellerophon on 15 July 1815.[220]
Exile on Saint Helena
Napoleon on Saint Helena, watercolor by Franz Josef Sandmann, c. 1820
The British kept Napoleon on the island of Saint Helena in the Atlantic Ocean, 1,870 km (1,162 mi) from the west coast of Africa. They also took the precaution of sending a small garrison of soldiers to both Saint Helena and the uninhabited Ascension Island, which lay between St. Helena and Europe, to prevent any escape from the island.[221]
Napoleon was moved to Longwood House on Saint Helena in December 1815; it had fallen into disrepair, and the location was damp, windswept and unhealthy.[222][223] The Times published articles insinuating the British government was trying to hasten his death. Napoleon often complained of the living conditions of Longwood House in letters to the island’s governor and his custodian, Hudson Lowe,[224] while his attendants complained of «colds, catarrhs, damp floors and poor provisions.»[225] Modern scientists have speculated that his later illness may have arisen from arsenic poisoning caused by copper arsenite in the wallpaper at Longwood House.[226]
With a small cadre of followers, Napoleon dictated his memoirs and grumbled about the living conditions. Lowe cut Napoleon’s expenditure, ruled that no gifts were allowed if they mentioned his imperial status, and made his supporters sign a guarantee they would stay with the prisoner indefinitely.[227] When he held a dinner party, men were expected to wear military dress and «women [appeared] in evening gowns and gems. It was an explicit denial of the circumstances of his captivity».[228]
While in exile, Napoleon wrote a book about Julius Caesar, one of his great heroes.[229] He also studied English under the tutelage of Count Emmanuel de Las Cases with the main aim of being able to read English newspapers and books, as access to French newspapers and books was heavily restricted to him on Saint Helena.[230] Napoleon also devoted himself to compiling a book «Mémorial de Ste-Hélène«, an account which reflected his self-depiction as a liberal, visionary ruler for European unification, deposed by reactionary elements of the Ancien Régime.[231]
Another pastime of Napoleon’s while in exile was playing card games.[232][233] The number of patiences named in his honour seems to suggest that he was an avid player of the solitary game. Napoleon at St Helena is described as being a favourite of his,[234] while Napoleon’s Favourite (or St. Helena) is clearly a contender. Other games with a Napoleonic theme include Napoleon’s Flank, Napoleon’s Shoulder, Napoleon’s Square and Little Napoleon Patience. However, Arnold argues that, while Napoleon played cards in exile, the notion that he played numerous patience games is «based on a misunderstanding».[232]
There were rumours of plots and even of his escape from Saint Helena, but in reality, no serious attempts were ever made.[235] For English poet Lord Byron, Napoleon was the epitome of the Romantic hero, the persecuted, lonely, and flawed genius.[236]
Death
Napoleon’s personal physician, Barry O’Meara, warned London that his declining state of health was mainly caused by the harsh treatment. During the last few years of his life, Napoleon confined himself for months on end in his damp, mold-infested and wretched habitation of Longwood. Years of isolation and loneliness took its toll on Napoleon’s mental health, having his court continually reduced, including the arrest of Count Emmanuel de Las Cases, conditions which Lord Holland used to bring about a debate regarding the treatment of Napoleon in captivity.[237]
In February 1821, Napoleon’s health began to deteriorate rapidly, and he reconciled with the Catholic Church. By March, he had become confined to bed. Napoleon died on 5 May 1821 at Longwood House at age 51, after making his last confession, Extreme Unction and Viaticum in the presence of Father Ange Vignali from his deathbed. His last words were, France, l’armée, tête d’armée, Joséphine («France, the army, head of the army, Joséphine»).[238][239][231]
Shortly after his death, an autopsy was conducted and Francesco Antommarchi, the doctor conducting the autopsy, cut off Napoleon’s penis.[29][page needed][240] Napoleon’s original death mask was created around 6 May, although it is not clear which doctor created it.[i][242] Napoleon’s heart and intestines were removed and contained separately in two sealed vessels, which were placed inside his coffin at his feet. In his will, he had asked to be buried on the banks of the Seine, but the British governor said he should be buried on Saint Helena, in the Valley of the Willows.[238]
In 1840, Louis Philippe I obtained permission from the British government to return Napoleon’s remains to France. His casket was opened to confirm that it still contained the former emperor. Despite being dead for nearly two decades, Napoleon had been very well preserved and not decomposed at all. On 15 December 1840, a state funeral was held. The horse-drawn hearse proceeded from the Arc de Triomphe down the Champs-Élysées, across the Place de la Concorde to the Esplanade des Invalides and then to the cupola in St Jérôme’s Chapel, where it remained until the tomb designed by Louis Visconti was completed.
In 1861, Napoleon’s remains were entombed in a sarcophagus of red quartzite from Russia (often mistaken for porphyry) in the crypt under the dome at Les Invalides.[243]
Cause of death
Situation of Napoleon’s body when his coffin was reopened on St Helena, by Jules Rigo, 1840
The cause of Napoleon’s death has been debated. His physician, François Carlo Antommarchi, led the autopsy, which found the cause of death to be stomach cancer. Antommarchi did not sign the official report.[244] Napoleon’s father had died of stomach cancer, although this was apparently unknown at the time of the autopsy.[245] Antommarchi found evidence of a stomach ulcer; this was the most convenient explanation for the British, who wanted to avoid criticism over their care of Napoleon.[238]
In 1955, the diaries of Napoleon’s valet, Louis Marchand, were published. His description of Napoleon in the months before his death led Sten Forshufvud in a 1961 paper in Nature to put forward other causes for his death, including deliberate arsenic poisoning.[246] Arsenic was used as a poison during the era because it was undetectable when administered over a long period. Furthermore, in a 1978 book with Ben Weider, Forshufvud noted that Napoleon’s body was found to be well preserved when moved in 1840. Arsenic is a strong preservative, and therefore this supported the poisoning hypothesis. Forshufvud and Weider observed that Napoleon had attempted to quench abnormal thirst by drinking large amounts of orgeat syrup that contained cyanide compounds in the almonds used for flavouring.[246] They maintained that the potassium tartrate used in his treatment prevented his stomach from expelling these compounds and that his thirst was a symptom of the poison. Their hypothesis was that the calomel given to Napoleon became an overdose, which killed him and left extensive tissue damage behind.[246] According to a 2007 article, the type of arsenic found in Napoleon’s hair shafts was mineral, the most toxic, and according to toxicologist Patrick Kintz, this supported the conclusion that he was murdered.[247]
There have been modern studies that have supported the original autopsy finding.[247] In a 2008 study, researchers analysed samples of Napoleon’s hair from throughout his life, as well as samples from his family and other contemporaries. All samples had high levels of arsenic, approximately 100 times higher than the current average. According to these researchers, Napoleon’s body was already heavily contaminated with arsenic as a boy, and the high arsenic concentration in his hair was not caused by intentional poisoning; people were constantly exposed to arsenic from glues and dyes throughout their lives.[j] Studies published in 2007 and 2008 dismissed evidence of arsenic poisoning, suggesting peptic ulcer and gastric cancer as the cause of death.[249]
Religion
Napoleon was baptised in Ajaccio on 21 July 1771. He was raised as a Catholic but never developed much faith,[250] though he recalled the day of his First Communion in the Catholic Church to be the happiest day of his life.[251][252] As an adult, Napoleon was a deist, believing in an absent and distant God. However, he had a keen appreciation of the power of organized religion in social and political affairs, and he paid a great deal of attention to bending it to his purposes. He noted the influence of Catholicism’s rituals and splendors.[250]
Napoleon had a civil marriage with Joséphine de Beauharnais, without religious ceremony. Napoleon was crowned Emperor on 2 December 1804 at Notre-Dame de Paris in a ceremony presided over by Pope Pius VII. On the eve of the coronation ceremony, and at the insistence of Pope Pius VII, a private religious wedding ceremony of Napoleon and Joséphine was celebrated. Cardinal Fesch performed the wedding.[253] This marriage was annulled by tribunals under Napoleon’s control in January 1810. On 1 April 1810, Napoleon married the Austrian princess Marie Louise in a Catholic ceremony. Napoleon was excommunicated by the Pope through the bull Quum memoranda in 1809, but later reconciled with the Catholic Church before his death in 1821.[254] While in exile in Saint Helena he is recorded to have said «I know men; and I tell you that Jesus Christ is not a man.»[255][256][257]
He also defended Muhammad («a great man») against Voltaire’s Mahomet.[258]
Concordat
Leaders of the Catholic Church taking the civil oath required by the Concordat
Seeking national reconciliation between revolutionaries and Catholics, Napoleon and Pope Pius VII signed the Concordat of 1801 on 15 July 1801. It solidified the Roman Catholic Church as the majority church of France and brought back most of its civil status. The hostility of devout Catholics against the state had now largely been resolved. The Concordat did not restore the vast church lands and endowments that had been seized during the revolution and sold off. As a part of the Concordat, Napoleon presented another set of laws called the Organic Articles.[259][260]
While the Concordat restored much power to the papacy, the balance of church–state relations had tilted firmly in Napoleon’s favour. He selected the bishops and supervised church finances. Napoleon and the Pope both found the Concordat useful. Similar arrangements were made with the Church in territories controlled by Napoleon, especially Italy and Germany.[261] Now, Napoleon could win favour with the Catholics while also controlling Rome in a political sense. Napoleon said in April 1801, «Skillful conquerors have not got entangled with priests. They can both contain them and use them». French children were issued a catechism that taught them to love and respect Napoleon.[262]
Arrest of Pope Pius VII
In 1809, under Napoleon’s orders, Pope Pius VII was placed under arrest in Italy, and in 1812 the prisoner Pontiff was transferred to France, being held in the Palace of Fontainebleau.[263] Because the arrest was made in a clandestine manner, some sources[264][263] describe it as a kidnapping. In January 1813, Napoleon personally forced the Pope to sign a humiliating «Concordat of Fontainebleau»[265] which was later repudiated by the Pontiff.[266] The Pope was not released until 1814, when the Coalition invaded France.
Religious emancipation
Napoleon emancipated Jews, as well as Protestants in Catholic countries and Catholics in Protestant countries, from laws which restricted them to ghettos, and he expanded their rights to property, worship, and careers. Despite the antisemitic reaction to Napoleon’s policies from foreign governments and within France, he believed emancipation would benefit France by attracting Jews to the country given the restrictions they faced elsewhere.[267]
In 1806 an assembly of Jewish notables was gathered by Napoleon to discuss 12 questions broadly dealing with the relations between Jews and Christians, as well as other issues dealing with the Jewish ability to integrate into French society. Later, after the questions were answered in a satisfactory way according to the Emperor, a «great Sanhedrin» was brought together to transform the answers into decisions that would form the basis of the future status of the Jews in France and the rest of the empire Napoleon was building.[268]
He stated, «I will never accept any proposals that will obligate the Jewish people to leave France, because to me the Jews are the same as any other citizen in our country. It takes weakness to chase them out of the country, but it takes strength to assimilate them».[269] He was seen as so favourable to the Jews that the Russian Orthodox Church formally condemned him as «Antichrist and the Enemy of God».[270]
One year after the final meeting of the Sanhedrin, on 17 March 1808, Napoleon placed the Jews on probation. Several new laws restricting the citizenship the Jews had been offered 17 years previously were instituted at that time. However, despite pressure from leaders of a number of Christian communities to refrain from granting Jews emancipation, within one year of the issue of the new restrictions, they were once again lifted in response to the appeal of Jews from all over France.[268]
Freemasonry
It is not known for certain if Napoleon was initiated into Freemasonry. As Emperor, he appointed his brothers to Masonic offices under his jurisdiction: Louis was given the title of Deputy Grand Master in 1805; Jerome the title of Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Westphalia; Joseph was appointed Grand Master of the Grand Orient de France; and finally Lucien was a member of the Grand Orient of France.[271]
Personality
Napoleon visiting the Palais Royal for the opening of the 8th session of the Tribunat in 1807, by Merry-Joseph Blondel
Historians emphasize the strength of the ambition that took Napoleon from an obscure village to rule over most of Europe.[272] In-depth academic studies about his early life conclude that up until age 2, he had a «gentle disposition».[30] His older brother, Joseph, frequently received their mother’s attention which made Napoleon more assertive and approval-driven. During his early schooling years, he would be harshly bullied by classmates for his Corsican identity and limited command of the French language. To withstand the stress he became domineering, eventually developing an inferiority complex.[30]
George F. E. Rudé stresses his «rare combination of will, intellect and physical vigour».[273] In one-on-one situations he typically had a hypnotic effect on people, seemingly bending the strongest leaders to his will.[274] He understood military technology, but was not an innovator in that regard.[275] He was an innovator in using the financial, bureaucratic, and diplomatic resources of France. He could rapidly dictate a series of complex commands to his subordinates, keeping in mind where major units were expected to be at each future point, and like a chess master, «seeing» the best plays moves ahead.[276] This intellectual vigour was accompanied by a mixture of «remarkable charisma and willpower» and «a furious temper» exhibited during failure of his plans; which commanded respect as well as dread from his adjutants.[277]
Napoleon maintained strict, efficient work habits, prioritizing what needed to be done. He cheated at cards, but repaid the losses; he had to win at everything he attempted.[278] He kept relays of staff and secretaries at work. Unlike many generals, Napoleon did not examine history to ask what Hannibal or Alexander or anyone else did in a similar situation. Critics said he won many battles simply because of luck; Napoleon responded, «Give me lucky generals», arguing that «luck» comes to leaders who recognize opportunity, and seize it.[279] Dwyer states that Napoleon’s victories at Austerlitz and Jena in 1805–06 heightened his sense of self-grandiosity, leaving him even more certain of his destiny and invincibility.[280] «I am of the race that founds empires» he once boasted, deeming himself an heir to the Ancient Romans.[281]
In terms of influence on events, it was more than Napoleon’s personality that took effect. He reorganized France itself to supply the men and money needed for wars.[282] He inspired his men—the Duke of Wellington said his presence on the battlefield was worth 40,000 soldiers, for he inspired confidence from privates to field marshals.[283] The force of his personality neutralized material difficulties as his soldiers fought with the confidence that with Napoleon in charge they would surely win.[284]
Image
The military historian Martin van Creveld has described him as «the most competent human being who ever lived».[285] Since his death, many towns, streets, ships, and even cartoon characters have been named after him. He has been portrayed in hundreds of films and discussed in hundreds of thousands of books and articles.[286][287][288] The German legal scholar Carl Theoder Welcker described Napoleon as «the greatest master of Machiavellism».[289]
When his contemporaries met him in person, many were surprised by his apparently unremarkable physical appearance in contrast to his significant deeds and reputation, especially in his youth, when he was consistently described as small and thin. English painter Joseph Farington, who observed Napoleon personally in 1802, commented that «Samuel Rogers stood a little way from me and… seemed to be disappointed in the look of [Napoleon’s] countenance [«face»] and said it was that of a little Italian.» Farington said Napoleon’s eyes were «lighter, and more of a grey, than I should have expected from his complexion», that «his person is below middle size», and that «his general aspect was milder than I had before thought it.»[290]
A personal friend of Napoleon’s said that when he first met him in Brienne-le-Château as a young man, Napoleon was only notable «for the dark color of his complexion, for his piercing and scrutinising glance, and for the style of his conversation»; he also said that Napoleon was personally a serious and somber man: «his conversation bore the appearance of ill-humor, and he was certainly not very amiable.»[291] Johann Ludwig Wurstemberger, who accompanied Napoleon from Camp Fornio in 1797 and on the Swiss campaign of 1798, noted that «Bonaparte was rather slight and emaciated-looking; his face, too, was very thin, with a dark complexion… his black, unpowdered hair hung down evenly over both shoulders», but that, despite his slight and unkempt appearance, «[h]is looks and expression were earnest and powerful.»[292]
Denis Davydov met him personally and considered him remarkably average in appearance:
His face was slightly swarthy, with regular features. His nose was not very large, but straight, with a slight, hardly noticeable bend. The hair on his head was dark reddish-blond; his eyebrows and eyelashes were much darker than the colour of his hair, and his blue eyes, set off by the almost black lashes, gave him a most pleasing expression … The man I saw was of short stature, just over five feet tall, rather heavy although he was only 37 years old.[293]
During the Napoleonic Wars, he was taken seriously by the British press as a dangerous tyrant, poised to invade. Despite or due to his average size, Napoleon was mocked in British newspapers as a short tempered small man and he was nicknamed «Little Boney in a strong fit».[294] A nursery rhyme warned children that Bonaparte ravenously ate naughty people; the «bogeyman».[295] The British propaganda about his supposedly small size was so successful that many people today «know» very little besides this untruth about him.[296] At 1.57 metres (5 ft 2 in), he had the height of an average French male but was short for an aristocrat or officer (partly why he was assigned to the artillery, since at the time the infantry and cavalry required more commanding figures).[297]
Some historians believe his size at death was incorrectly recorded due to use of an obsolete old French yardstick (a French foot equals 33 cm, while an English foot equals 30.47 cm).[297][298] But Napoleon was a champion of the metric system and had no use for the old yardsticks that had been out of use since 1793 in France. It is likely that he was 1.57 m (5 ft 2 in), the height measured on St. Helena (a British island), since he would have most likely been measured with an English yardstick rather than a yardstick of the French Old Regime.[297] Napoleon surrounded himself with tall bodyguards and was affectionately nicknamed le petit caporal (the little corporal), reflecting his reported camaraderie with his soldiers rather than his height.
When he became First Consul and later Emperor, Napoleon eschewed his general’s uniform and habitually wore the green colonel uniform (non-Hussar) of a colonel of the Chasseur à Cheval of the Imperial Guard, the regiment that served as his personal escort many times, with a large bicorne. He also habitually wore (usually on Sundays) the blue uniform of a colonel of the Imperial Guard Foot Grenadiers (blue with white facings and red cuffs). He also wore his Légion d’honneur star, medal and ribbon, and the Order of the Iron Crown decorations, white French-style culottes and white stockings. This was in contrast to the complex uniforms with many decorations of his marshals and those around him.
In his later years he gained quite a bit of weight and had a complexion considered pale or sallow, something contemporaries took note of. Novelist Paul de Kock, who saw him in 1811 on the balcony of the Tuileries, called Napoleon «yellow, obese, and bloated».[299] A British captain who met him in 1815 stated «I felt very much disappointed, as I believe everyone else did, in his appearance … He is fat, rather what we call pot-bellied, and although his leg is well shaped, it is rather clumsy … He is very sallow, with light grey eyes, and rather thin, greasy-looking brown hair, and altogether a very nasty, priestlike-looking fellow.»[300]
The stock character of Napoleon is a comically short «petty tyrant» and this has become a cliché in popular culture. He is often portrayed wearing a large bicorne hat—sideways—with a hand-in-waistcoat gesture—a reference to the painting produced in 1812 by Jacques-Louis David.[301] In 1908 Alfred Adler, a psychologist, cited Napoleon to describe an inferiority complex in which short people adopt an over-aggressive behaviour to compensate for lack of height; this inspired the term Napoleon complex.[302]
Reforms
Napoleon instituted various reforms, such as higher education, a tax code, road and sewer systems, and established the Banque de France, the first central bank in French history. He negotiated the Concordat of 1801 with the Catholic Church, which sought to reconcile the mostly Catholic population to his regime. It was presented alongside the Organic Articles, which regulated public worship in France. He dissolved the Holy Roman Empire prior to German Unification later in the 19th century. The sale of the Louisiana Territory to the United States doubled the size of the United States.[303]
In May 1802, he instituted the Legion of Honour, a substitute for the old royalist decorations and orders of chivalry, to encourage civilian and military achievements; the order is still the highest decoration in France.[304]
Napoleonic Code
First page of the 1804 original edition of the Code Civil
Napoleon’s set of civil laws, the Code Civil—now often known as the Napoleonic Code—was prepared by committees of legal experts under the supervision of Jean Jacques Régis de Cambacérès, the Second Consul. Napoleon participated actively in the sessions of the Council of State that revised the drafts. The development of the code was a fundamental change in the nature of the civil law legal system with its stress on clearly written and accessible law. Other codes («Les cinq codes») were commissioned by Napoleon to codify criminal and commerce law; a Code of Criminal Instruction was published, which enacted rules of due process.[305]
The Napoleonic code was adopted throughout much of Continental Europe, though only in the lands he conquered, and remained in force after Napoleon’s defeat. Napoleon said: «My true glory is not to have won forty battles … Waterloo will erase the memory of so many victories. … But … what will live forever, is my Civil Code».[306] The Code influences a quarter of the world’s jurisdictions such as those in Continental Europe, the Americas, and Africa.[307]
Dieter Langewiesche described the code as a «revolutionary project» that spurred the development of bourgeois society in Germany by the extension of the right to own property and an acceleration towards the end of feudalism. Napoleon reorganized what had been the Holy Roman Empire, made up of about three hundred Kleinstaaterei, into a more streamlined forty-state Confederation of the Rhine; this helped promote the German Confederation and the unification of Germany in 1871.[308]
The movement toward Italian unification was similarly precipitated by Napoleonic rule.[309] These changes contributed to the development of nationalism and the nation state.[310]
Napoleon directly overthrew remnants of feudalism in much of western Continental Europe. He liberalized property laws, ended seigneurial dues, abolished the guild of merchants and craftsmen to facilitate entrepreneurship, legalized divorce, closed the Jewish ghettos and made Jews equal to everyone else. The Inquisition ended as did the Holy Roman Empire. The power of church courts and religious authority was sharply reduced and equality under the law was proclaimed for all men.[311]
Warfare
Statue in Cherbourg-Octeville unveiled by Napoleon III in 1858. Napoleon I strengthened the town’s defences to prevent British naval incursions.
In the field of military organization, Napoleon borrowed from previous theorists such as Jacques Antoine Hippolyte, Comte de Guibert, and from the reforms of preceding French governments, and then developed much of what was already in place. He continued the policy, which emerged from the Revolution, of promotion based primarily on merit.[312]
Corps replaced divisions as the largest army units, mobile artillery was integrated into reserve batteries, the staff system became more fluid and cavalry returned as an important formation in French military doctrine. These methods are now referred to as essential features of Napoleonic warfare.[312] Though he consolidated the practice of modern conscription introduced by the Directory, one of the restored monarchy’s first acts was to end it.[313]
His opponents learned from Napoleon’s innovations. The increased importance of artillery after 1807 stemmed from his creation of a highly mobile artillery force, the growth in artillery numbers, and changes in artillery practices. As a result of these factors, Napoleon, rather than relying on infantry to wear away the enemy’s defences, now could use massed artillery as a spearhead to pound a break in the enemy’s line that was then exploited by supporting infantry and cavalry. McConachy rejects the alternative theory that growing reliance on artillery by the French army beginning in 1807 was an outgrowth of the declining quality of the French infantry and, later, France’s inferiority in cavalry numbers.[314] Weapons and other kinds of military technology remained static through the Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras, but 18th-century operational mobility underwent change.[315]
Napoleon’s biggest influence was in the conduct of warfare. Antoine-Henri Jomini explained Napoleon’s methods in a widely used textbook that influenced all European and American armies.[316] Napoleon was regarded by the influential military theorist Carl von Clausewitz as a genius in the operational art of war, and historians rank him as a great military commander.[317] Wellington, when asked who was the greatest general of the day, answered: «In this age, in past ages, in any age, Napoleon».[318][incomplete short citation]
Under Napoleon, a new emphasis towards the destruction, not just outmaneuvering, of enemy armies emerged. Invasions of enemy territory occurred over broader fronts which made wars costlier and more decisive. The political effect of war increased; defeat for a European power meant more than the loss of isolated enclaves. Near-Carthaginian peaces intertwined whole national efforts, intensifying the Revolutionary phenomenon of total war.[319]
Metric system
The official introduction of the metric system in September 1799 was unpopular in large sections of French society. Napoleon’s rule greatly aided adoption of the new standard not only across France but also across the French sphere of influence. Napoleon took a retrograde step in 1812 when he passed legislation to introduce the mesures usuelles (traditional units of measurement) for retail trade,[320] a system of measure that resembled the pre-revolutionary units but were based on the kilogram and the metre; for example, the livre metrique (metric pound) was 500 g,[321] in contrast to the value of the livre du roi (the king’s pound), 489.5 g.[322] Other units of measure were rounded in a similar manner prior to the definitive introduction of the metric system across parts of Europe in the middle of the 19th century.[323]
Education
Napoleon’s educational reforms laid the foundation of a modern system of education in France and throughout much of Europe.[324] Napoleon synthesized the best academic elements from the Ancien Régime, The Enlightenment, and the Revolution, with the aim of establishing a stable, well-educated and prosperous society. He made French the only official language. He left some primary education in the hands of religious orders, but he offered public support to secondary education. Napoleon founded a number of state secondary schools (lycées) designed to produce a standardized education that was uniform across France.[325]
All students were taught the sciences along with modern and classical languages. Unlike the system during the Ancien Régime, religious topics did not dominate the curriculum, although they were present with the teachers from the clergy. Napoleon hoped to use religion to produce social stability.[325] He gave special attention to the advanced centers, such as the École Polytechnique, that provided both military expertise and state-of-the-art research in science.[326] Napoleon made some of the first efforts at establishing a system of secular and public education.[when?] The system featured scholarships and strict discipline, with the result being a French educational system that outperformed its European counterparts, many of which borrowed from the French system.[327]
Memory and evaluation
Criticism
In the political realm, historians debate whether Napoleon was «an enlightened despot who laid the foundations of modern Europe» or «a megalomaniac who wrought greater misery than any man before the coming of Hitler».[328] Many historians have concluded that he had grandiose foreign policy ambitions. The Continental powers as late as 1808 were willing to give him nearly all of his gains and titles, but some scholars maintain he was overly aggressive and pushed for too much, until his empire collapsed.[329][330]
He was considered a tyrant and usurper by his opponents at the time and ever since. His critics charge that he was not troubled when faced with the prospect of war and death for thousands, turned his search for undisputed rule into a series of conflicts throughout Europe and ignored treaties and conventions alike.[331] His role in the Haitian Revolution and decision to reinstate slavery in France’s overseas colonies are controversial and affect his reputation.[332] French liberal intellectual Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) was a staunch critic of political homogenisation and personality cult that dominated Napoleonic France and wrote several books condemning Napoleon such as «The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation» (1814) and «Principles of Politics Applicable to All Representative Governments» (1815). According to Constant, Bonapartism was even more tyrannical than the Bourbon monarchy, since it forced the masses to support its grand universalist narrative through imperialism and jingoism.[333]
Napoleon institutionalized plunder of conquered territories: French museums contain art stolen by Napoleon’s forces from across Europe. Artefacts were brought to the Musée du Louvre for a grand central museum; an example which would later be followed by others.[334] He was compared to Adolf Hitler by the historian Pieter Geyl in 1947,[335] and Claude Ribbe in 2005.[336] David G. Chandler, a historian of Napoleonic warfare, wrote in 1973 that, «Nothing could be more degrading to the former [Napoleon] and more flattering to the latter [Hitler]. The comparison is odious. On the whole Napoleon was inspired by a noble dream, wholly dissimilar from Hitler’s… Napoleon left great and lasting testimonies to his genius—in codes of law and national identities which survive to the present day. Adolf Hitler left nothing but destruction.»[337]
Critics argue Napoleon’s true legacy must reflect the loss of status for France and needless deaths brought by his rule: historian Victor Davis Hanson writes, «After all, the military record is unquestioned—17 years of wars, perhaps six million Europeans dead, France bankrupt, her overseas colonies lost.»[338] McLynn states that, «He can be viewed as the man who set back European economic life for a generation by the dislocating impact of his wars.»[331] Vincent Cronin replies that such criticism relies on the flawed premise that Napoleon was responsible for the wars which bear his name, when in fact France was the victim of a series of coalitions that aimed to destroy the ideals of the Revolution.[339]
British military historian Correlli Barnett calls him «a social misfit» who exploited France for his personal megalomaniac goals. He says Napoleon’s reputation is exaggerated.[340] French scholar Jean Tulard provided an influential account of his image as a saviour.[341] Louis Bergeron has praised the numerous changes he made to French society, especially regarding the law as well as education.[342] His greatest failure was the Russian invasion. Many historians have blamed Napoleon’s poor planning, but Russian scholars instead emphasize the Russian response, noting the notorious winter weather was just as hard on the defenders.[343]
The large and growing historiography in French, English, Russian, Spanish and other languages has been summarized and evaluated by numerous scholars.[344][345][346]
Propaganda and memory
1814 caricature of Napoleon being exiled to Elba: the ex-emperor is riding a donkey backwards while holding a broken sword.
Napoleon’s use of propaganda contributed to his rise to power, legitimated his régime, and established his image for posterity. Strict censorship, controlling various key constituents of the press, books, theatre, and art were part of his propaganda scheme, aimed at portraying him as bringing desperately wanted peace and stability to France. The propagandistic rhetoric changed in relation to events and to the atmosphere of Napoleon’s reign, focusing first on his role as a general in the army and identification as a soldier, and moving to his role as emperor and a civil leader. Specifically targeting his civilian audience, Napoleon fostered a relationship with the contemporary art community, taking an active role in commissioning and controlling different forms of art production to suit his propaganda goals.[347]
In England, Russia and across Europe—though not in France—Napoleon was a popular topic of caricature.[348][349][350]
Hazareesingh (2004) explores how Napoleon’s image and memory are best understood. They played a key role in collective political defiance of the Bourbon restoration monarchy in 1815–1830. People from different walks of life and areas of France, particularly Napoleonic veterans, drew on the Napoleonic legacy and its connections with the ideals of the 1789 Revolution.[351]
Widespread rumours of Napoleon’s return from St. Helena and Napoleon as an inspiration for patriotism, individual and collective liberties, and political mobilization manifested themselves in seditious materials, displaying the tricolor and rosettes. There were also subversive activities celebrating anniversaries of Napoleon’s life and reign and disrupting royal celebrations—they demonstrated the prevailing and successful goal of the varied supporters of Napoleon to constantly destabilize the Bourbon regime.[351]
Datta (2005) shows that, following the collapse of militaristic Boulangism in the late 1880s, the Napoleonic legend was divorced from party politics and revived in popular culture. Concentrating on two plays and two novels from the period—Victorien Sardou’s Madame Sans-Gêne (1893), Maurice Barrès’s Les Déracinés (1897), Edmond Rostand’s L’Aiglon (1900), and André de Lorde and Gyp’s Napoléonette (1913)—Datta examines how writers and critics of the Belle Époque exploited the Napoleonic legend for diverse political and cultural ends.[352]
Reduced to a minor character, the new fictional Napoleon became not a world historical figure but an intimate one, fashioned by individuals’ needs and consumed as popular entertainment. In their attempts to represent the emperor as a figure of national unity, proponents and detractors of the Third Republic used the legend as a vehicle for exploring anxieties about gender and fears about the processes of democratization that accompanied this new era of mass politics and culture.[352]
International Napoleonic Congresses take place regularly, with participation by members of the French and American military, French politicians and scholars from different countries.[353] In January 2012, the mayor of Montereau-Fault-Yonne, near Paris—the site of a late victory of Napoleon—proposed development of Napoleon’s Bivouac, a commemorative theme park at a projected cost of 200 million euros.[354]
Long-term influence outside France
Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform.[355] After the fall of Napoleon, not only was it retained by conquered countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of Italy and Germany, but it has been used as the basis of certain parts of law outside Europe including the Dominican Republic, the US state of Louisiana and the Canadian province of Quebec.[356] The code was also used as a model in many parts of Latin America.[357] The reputation of Napoleon in Poland has been favourable, especially for his support of independence, opposition to Russia, his legal code, the abolition of serfdom, and the introduction of modern middle class administration.[358]
Napoleon had an influence on the establishment of modern Germany. He caused the end of the Holy Roman Empire and helped create middle sized states such as Bavaria and Württemberg along the great powers Prussia and Austria. Although he also directly or indirectly helped to reduce the number of German states (from about 300 to fewer than 50), the middle sized states tried to prevent the unification of Germany as a federalist state. A byproduct of the French occupation was a strong development in German nationalism which eventually turned the German Confederation into the German Empire after a series of conflicts and other political developments.
Napoleon indirectly began the process of Latin American independence when he invaded Spain in 1808. The abdication of King Charles IV and renunciation of his son, Ferdinand VII created a power vacuum that was filled by native born political leaders such as Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín. Such leaders embraced nationalistic sentiments influenced by French nationalism and led successful independence movements in Latin America.[359]
Napoleon also significantly aided the United States when he agreed to sell the territory of Louisiana for 15 million dollars during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. That territory almost doubled the size of the United States, adding the equivalent of 13 states to the Union.[303]
From 1796 to 2020, at least 95 major ships were named for him. In the 21st century, at least 18 Napoleon ships are operated under the flag of France, as well as Indonesia, Germany, Italy, Australia, Argentina, India, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.[360]
Wives, mistresses, and children
Napoleon married Joséphine (née Marie Josèphe Rose Tascher de La Pagerie) in 1796, when he was 26; she was a 32-year-old widow whose first husband, Alexandre de Beauharnais, had been executed during the Reign of Terror. Five days after Alexandre de Beauharnais’ death, the Reign of Terror initiator Maximilien de Robespierre was overthrown and executed, and, with the help of high-placed friends, Joséphine was freed.[361] Until she met Bonaparte, she had been known as «Rose», a name which he disliked. He called her «Joséphine» instead, and she went by this name henceforth. Bonaparte often sent her love letters while on his campaigns.[362] He formally adopted her son Eugène and second cousin (via marriage) Stéphanie and arranged dynastic marriages for them. Joséphine had her daughter Hortense marry Napoleon’s brother Louis.[363]
Joséphine had lovers, such as Lieutenant Hippolyte Charles, during Napoleon’s Italian campaign.[364] Napoleon learnt of that affair and a letter he wrote about it was intercepted by the British and published widely, to embarrass Napoleon. Napoleon had his own affairs too: during the Egyptian campaign he took Pauline Bellisle Fourès, the wife of a junior officer, as his mistress. She became known as «Cleopatra».[k][366]
While Napoleon’s mistresses had children by him, Joséphine did not produce an heir, possibly because of either the stresses of her imprisonment during the Reign of Terror or an abortion she may have had in her twenties.[367] Napoleon chose divorce so he could remarry in search of an heir. Despite his divorce from Josephine, Napoleon showed his dedication to her for the rest of his life. When he heard the news of her death while in exile in Elba, he locked himself in his room and would not come out for two full days.[215] Her name would also be his final word on his deathbed in 1821.
On 11 March 1810 by proxy, he married the 19-year-old Marie Louise, Archduchess of Austria, and a great-niece of Marie Antoinette. Thus he had married into a German royal and imperial family.[368] Louise was less than happy with the arrangement, at least at first, stating: «Just to see the man would be the worst form of torture». Her great-aunt had been executed in France, while Napoleon had fought numerous campaigns against Austria all throughout his military career. However, she seemed to warm up to him over time. After her wedding, she wrote to her father: «He loves me very much. I respond to his love sincerely. There is something very fetching and very eager about him that is impossible to resist».[215]
Napoleon and Marie Louise remained married until his death, though she did not join him in exile on Elba and thereafter never saw her husband again. The couple had one child, Napoleon Francis Joseph Charles (1811–1832), known from birth as the King of Rome. He became Napoleon II in 1814 and reigned for only two weeks. He was awarded the title of the Duke of Reichstadt in 1818 and died of tuberculosis aged 21, with no children.[368]
Napoleon acknowledged one illegitimate son: Charles Léon (1806–1881) by Eléonore Denuelle de La Plaigne.[369] Alexandre Colonna-Walewski (1810–1868), the son of his mistress Maria Walewska, although acknowledged by Walewska’s husband, was also widely known to be his child, and the DNA of his direct male descendant has been used to help confirm Napoleon’s Y-chromosome haplotype.[370] He may have had further unacknowledged illegitimate offspring as well, such as Eugen Megerle von Mühlfeld by Emilie Victoria Kraus von Wolfsberg[371] and Hélène Napoleone Bonaparte (1816–1907) by Albine de Montholon.
Notes
- ^ , French: Napoléon Bonaparte [napɔleɔ̃ bɔnapaʁt]; Italian: Napoleone Bonaparte, [napoleˈoːne ˌbɔnaˈparte]; Corsican: Napulione Buonaparte.
- ^ French: Napoléon Ier
- ^ He established a system of public education,[7] abolished the vestiges of feudalism,[8] emancipated Jews and other religious minorities,[9] abolished the Spanish Inquisition,[10] enacted legal protections for an emerging middle class,[11] and centralized state power at the expense of religious authorities.[12]
- ^ His brother, also called Napoleon, died at birth and his sister, Maria Anna, died shortly before her first birthday. In total, two siblings died at birth and three died in infancy.
- ^ Although the 1768 Treaty of Versailles formally ceded Corsica’s rights, it remained un-incorporated during 1769[18] until it became a province of France in 1770.[19] Corsica would be legally integrated as a département in 1789.[20][21]
- ^ Aside from his name, there does not appear to be a connection between him and Napoleon’s theorem.[35]
- ^ He was mainly referred to as Bonaparte until he became First Consul for life.[40]
- ^ This is depicted in Bonaparte Crossing the Alps by Hippolyte Delaroche and in Jacques-Louis David’s imperial Napoleon Crossing the Alps. He is less realistically portrayed on a charger in the latter work.[100]
- ^ It was customary to cast a death mask of a leader. At least four genuine death masks of Napoleon are known to exist: one in The Cabildo in New Orleans, one in a Liverpool museum, another in Havana and one in the library of the University of North Carolina.[241]
- ^ The body can tolerate large doses of arsenic if ingested regularly, and arsenic was a fashionable cure-all.[248]
- ^ One night, during an illicit liaison with actress Marguerite Georges, Napoleon had a major fit. This and other more minor attacks have led historians to debate whether he had epilepsy and, if so, to what extent.[365]
Citations
- ^ «Fac-similé de l’acte de baptême de Napoléon, rédigé en italien. – Images d’Art» [Facsimile of Napoleon’s baptismal certificate, written in Italian. – Art Pictures] (in French).
- ^ a b Roberts 2014, Introduction
- ^ Charles Messenger, ed. (2001). Reader’s Guide to Military History. Routledge. pp. 391–427. ISBN 978-1-135-95970-8.
- ^ Roberts, A. (2016). Napoleon the Great. United Kingdom: Penguin Books Limited. (p. 1)
- ^ a b c Geoffrey Ellis (1997). Napoleon. Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 9781317874690.
- ^ Forrest, Alan (26 March 2015). Waterloo: Great Battles. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0199663255. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
- ^ Grab 2003, p. 56.
- ^ Broers, M. and Hicks, P.The Napoleonic Empire and the New European Political Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, p. 230
- ^ Conner, S. P. The Age of Napoleon. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004, pp. 38–40.
- ^ Perez, Joseph. The Spanish Inquisition: A History. Yale University Press, 2005, p. 98
- ^ Fremont-Barnes, G. and Fisher, T. The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Osprey Publishing, 2004, p. 336
- ^ Grab, A. Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, Conclusion
- ^ Andrew Roberts, Napoleon: A Life (2014) p. xxxiii
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 2
- ^ Gueniffey, Patrice (13 April 2015). Bonaparte. Harvard University Press. pp. 21–22. ISBN 978-0-674-42601-6.
- ^ a b Dwyer 2008a, ch 1
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. xv
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 6
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 20
- ^ «Corsica | History, Geography, & Points of Interest». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 28 November 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 142.
- ^ a b Cronin 1994, pp. 20–21
- ^ Chamberlain, Alexander (1896). The Child and Childhood in Folk Thought: (The Child in Primitive Culture), p. 385. MacMillan.
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 27
- ^ a b c International School History (8 February 2012), Napoleon’s Rise to Power, archived from the original on 8 May 2015, retrieved 29 January 2018
- ^ Johnson, Paul (2006). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-303745-3. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ a b c Roberts 2001, p. xvi
- ^ a b c Murari·Culture·, Edoardo (20 August 2019). «Italians Of The Past: Napoleon Bonaparte». Italics Magazine. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- ^ a b Roberts 2014.
- ^ a b c d Parker, Harold T. (1971). «The Formation of Napoleon’s Personality: An Exploratory Essay». French Historical Studies. 7 (1): 6–26. doi:10.2307/286104. JSTOR 286104.
- ^ Adams, Michael (2014). Napoleon and Russia. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-4212-3. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 11.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 18
- ^ Grégoire, Henri (1790). «Report on the necessity and means to annihilate the patois and to universalise the use of the French language». Wikisource (in French). Paris: French National Convention. Retrieved 16 January 2020.
[…] the number of people who speak it purely does not exceed three million; and probably the number of those who write it correctly is even fewer.
- ^ Wells 1992, p. 74
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 21
- ^ Chandler 1973, pp. 12–14.
- ^ a b Dwyer 2008a, p. 42
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 26
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 290
- ^ Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, Corsica.
- ^ Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, Revolution.
- ^ David Nicholls (1999). Napoleon: A Biographical Companion. ABC-CLIO. p. 131. ISBN 978-0-87436-957-1.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 55
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 61
- ^ a b c d e Roberts 2001, p. xviii
- ^ Roberts, Andrew (2011). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-698-17628-7.
- ^ «Napoleon I | Biography, Achievements, & Facts». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 12 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 132
- ^ Dwyer, p. 136.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 76
- ^ Patrice Gueniffey, Bonaparte: 1769–1802 (Harvard UP, 2015), pp. 137–59.
- ^ Bourrienne, Memoirs of Napoleon, p. 39
- ^ Bourrienne, Memoirs of Napoleon, p. 38
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 157
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 76, 84
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 92
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 26
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 164
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 93
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 96
- ^ Johnson 2002, p. 27
- ^ Carlyle, Thomas (1896). «The works of Thomas Carlyle – The French Revolution, vol. III, book 3.VII». Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ Englund (2010) pp. 92–94
- ^ Bell 2015, p. 29.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, pp. 284–85
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 132
- ^ Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte, Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne, pp 158.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 145
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 142
- ^ Harvey 2006, p. 179
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 135
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 306
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 305
- ^ Bell 2015, p. 30.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 322
- ^ a b c Watson 2003, pp. 13–14
- ^ Amini 2000, p. 12
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 342
- ^ Englund (2010) pp. 127–28
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 175
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 179
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 372
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 188.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 392
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, pp. 411–24
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 198.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 189
- ^ Gueniffey, Bonaparte: 1769–1802 pp. 500–02.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 442
- ^ a b c Connelly 2006, p. 57
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, pp. 205–206.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 444
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 455
- ^ François Furet, The French Revolution, 1770–1814 (1996), p. 212
- ^ Georges Lefebvre, Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799–1807 (1969), pp. 60–68
- ^ a b c d Lyons 1994, p. 111
- ^ Lefebvre, Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799–1807 (1969), pp. 71–92
- ^ Holt, Lucius Hudson; Chilton, Alexander Wheeler (1919). A Brief History of Europe from 1789–1815. Macmillan. p. 206.
August 1802 referendum napoleon.
- ^ Chandler 2002, p. 51
- ^ Chandler 1966, pp. 279–281
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 235
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 292
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 293
- ^ a b c Chandler 1966, p. 296
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, pp. 298–304
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 301
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 302
- ^ a b Lyons 1994, pp. 111–114
- ^ a b c d Lyons 1994, p. 113
- ^ Edwards 1999, p. 55
- ^ James, C. L. R. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution, [1963] (Penguin Books, 2001), pp. 141–142.
- ^ «French Emancipation». obo.
- ^ «May 10th 1802, «The last cry of innocence and despair»«. herodote (in French). Retrieved 6 December 2019.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 301.
- ^ James, C. L. R. (1963) [1938]. The Black Jacobins (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage Books. pp. 45–55. OCLC 362702.
- ^ «CHRONOLOGY-Who banned slavery when?». Reuters. Thomson Reuters. 22 March 2007. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Oldfield, Dr John (17 February 2011). «British Anti-slavery». BBC History. BBC. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Perry, James Arrogant Armies Great Military Disasters and the Generals Behind Them, (Edison: Castle Books, 2005) pp. 78–79.
- ^ Christer Petley, White Fury: A Jamaican Slaveholder and the Age of Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), p. 182.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 303.
- ^ Connelly 2006, p. 70
- ^ Mowat R B (1924). The Diplomacy Of Nepoleon.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 265
- ^ Zamoyski, pp. 338–339.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 243
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 296
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 297
- ^ De Rémusat, Claire Elisabeth, Memoirs of Madame De Rémusat, 1802–1808 Volume 1, HardPress Publishing, 2012, 542 pp., ISBN 978-1-290-51747-8.
- ^ a b c d Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, p. 355.
- ^ Dwyer, Philip (2015). «‘Citizen Emperor’: Political Ritual, Popular Sovereignty and the Coronation of Napoleon I». History. 100 (339): 40–57. doi:10.1111/1468-229X.12089. ISSN 1468-229X.
- ^ Paul W. Schroeder, The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848 (1996) pp. 231–286
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 328. Meanwhile, French territorial rearrangements in Germany occurred without Russian consultation and Napoleon’s annexations in the Po valley increasingly strained relations between the two.
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 331
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 323
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 332
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, p. 333
- ^ Michael J. Hughes, Forging Napoleon’s Grande Armée: Motivation, Military Culture, and Masculinity in the French Army, 1800–1808 (NYU Press, 2012).
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 321
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 332
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 108
- ^ Andrew Uffindell, Great Generals of the Napoleonic Wars. p. 15
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 156.
- ^ «Napoleon: Napoleon at War». www.pbs.org. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 156. «It is a historical cliché to compare the Schlieffen Plan with Hannibal’s tactical envelopment at Cannae (216 BC); Schlieffen owed more to Napoleon’s strategic maneuver on Ulm (1805)».
- ^ Glover (1967), pp. 233–252.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 407.
- ^ a b c Adrian Gilbert (2000). The Encyclopedia of Warfare: From Earliest Time to the Present Day. Taylor & Francis. p. 133. ISBN 978-1-57958-216-6. Archived from the original on 29 July 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 414
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 414
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 350
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 344
- ^ Karsh 2001, p. 12
- ^ Sicker 2001, p. 99.
- ^ Michael V. Leggiere (2015). Napoleon and Berlin: The Franco-Prussian War in North Germany, 1813. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-8061-8017-5. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016.
- ^ a b c Chandler 1966, pp. 467–468
- ^ a b c Brooks 2000, p. 110
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 497
- ^ Jacques Godechot et al. Napoleonic Era in Europe (1971) pp. 126–139
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 370
- ^ a b August Fournier (1911). Napoleon I.: A Biography. H. Holt. p. 459.
- ^ The History of Napoleon Bonaparte by John Stevens Cabot Abbott, 1882, p. 559
- ^ Roberts, pp. 458–459
- ^ a b Roberts, pp. 459–461
- ^ Horne, Alistair (1997). How Far From Austerlitz? Napoleon 1805–1815. Pan Macmillan. p. 238. ISBN 978-1-74328-540-4. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ Todd Fisher & Gregory Fremont-Barnes, The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. p. 197.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes pp. 198–199.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes p. 199.
- ^ Chandler, pp. 620
- ^ Engman, Max (2016). «Finland and the Napoleonic Empire». In Planert, Ute (ed.). Napoleon’s Empire. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 227–238. doi:10.1057/9781137455475_16. ISBN 978-1-349-56731-7 – via Springer Link.
- ^ «The Erfurt Convention 1808». Napoleon-series.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes p. 205.
- ^ Hope, John; Baird, D. (28 January 1809). «Battle of Corunna». Vol. 15, no. 4. Cobbett’s political register. pp. 91–94.
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, pp. 659–660
- ^ John Lynch, Caudillos in Spanish America 1800–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992, pp. 402–403.
- ^ a b c Fisher & Fremont-Barnes, p. 106.
- ^ Gill, pp. 44–45
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 690
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 690
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 706
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 707
- ^ a b Chandler 1973, p. 708.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 720.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 729.
- ^ «The British Expeditionary Force to Walcheren: 1809». napoleon-series.org. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
- ^ a b Todd Fisher & Gregory Fremont-Barnes, The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. p. 144.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 732.
- ^ David Watkin, The Roman Forum. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2012. 183.
ISBN 978-0-674-06367-9
books.google.com/books?id=cRrufMNLOhwC&pg=PA183 - ^ McLynn 1998, p. 378
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 495
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 507
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 506
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 504–505
- ^ Harvey 2006, p. 773
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 518
- ^ Markham 1988, p. 194
- ^ «Napoleon1812». napoleon-1812.nl. Archived from the original on 13 February 2016.
- ^ Markham 1988, pp. 190, 199
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 541
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 549
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 565
- ^ Chandler 1995, p. 1020
- ^ a b Riley, J.P. (2013). Napoleon and the World War of 1813: Lessons in Coalition Warfighting. Routledge. p. 206. ISBN 978-1-136-32135-1. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
- ^ Leggiere (2007). The Fall of Napoleon: Volume 1, The Allied Invasion of France, 1813–1814. pp. 53–54. ISBN 978-0-521-87542-4. Archived from the original on 21 September 2015.
- ^ Fremont-Barnes 2004, p. 14
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 585
- ^ Gates 2003, p. 259.
- ^ Lieven, Dominic (2010). Russia Against Napoleon: The True Story of the Campaigns of War and Peace. Penguin. pp. 484–485. ISBN 978-1-101-42938-9. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ a b Prutsch, M. (2012). Making Sense of Constitutional Monarchism in Post-Napoleonic France and Germany. Springer. pp. 10–15. ISBN 9781137291653.
- ^ A. Bell, David (2015). «5: Downfall, 1812–1815». Napoleon: A Concise Biography. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6.
- ^ «Napoleon’s act of abdication». Bulletin des lois de la Republique Française. July 1814. Archived from the original on 22 December 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 593–594
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 597
- ^ Latson, Jennifer. «Why Napoleon Probably Should Have Just Stayed in Exile the First Time». Archived from the original on 25 June 2016.
- ^ a b c «PBS – Napoleon: Napoleon and Josephine». PBS. Archived from the original on 21 August 2017.
- ^ a b c McLynn 1998, p. 604
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 605
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 607
- ^ Chesney 2006, p. 35
- ^ Cordingly 2004, p. 254
- ^ Cox, Dale (2015). Nicolls’ outpost : a War of 1812 fort at Chattahoochee, Florida. Old Kitchen Books. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-692-37936-3.
- ^ Hibbert, Christopher (2003). Napoleon’s Women. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 272. ISBN 978-0-393-32499-0. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ^ Information, Reed Business (28 October 1982). «Napoleon’s moulds». New Scientist: 257.
- ^ Schom 1997, pp. 769–70
- ^ «Two Days at Saint Helena». The Spirit of the English Magazines. Monroe and Francis: 402. 1832. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ^ Jones, David (14 October 1982). «The Singular Case of Napoleon’s Wallpaper». New Scientist: 101.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 642
- ^ «A JOURNEY TO ST. HELENA, HOME OF NAPOLEON’S LAST DAYS». Retrieved 18 March 2021.
- ^ I, Napoleon; Marchand, Louis Joseph (29 October 2017). Chronicles of Caesar’s Wars: The First-Ever Translation. Translated by Barzani, Arshan (1 ed.). Clio Books. Archived from the original on 3 December 2017.
- ^ Hicks, Peter. «Napoleon’s English Lessons». Napoleon.org. Archived from the original on 18 September 2016. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
- ^ a b Price, Munro (2014). «Epilogue: The Hundred Days». Napoleon: The End of Glory. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-19-966080-3.
- ^ a b Arnold (2011), p. 310.
- ^ «Napoleon I — Exile on St. Helena | Britannica». www.britannica.com. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ Henshaw (1870), p. 10.
- ^ Wilkins 1972
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 651
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 638–639.
- ^ a b c McLynn 1998, p. 655
- ^ Roberts, Napoleon (2014) 799–801
- ^ «Napoleon had a ‘very small’ penis according to C4 show». The Independent. 4 April 2014. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
- ^ Fulghum 2007
- ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 293–295
- ^ Driskel 1993, p. 168
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 656
- ^ Johnson 2002, pp. 180–181
- ^ a b c Cullen 2008, pp. 146–148
- ^ a b Cullen 2008, p. 156
- ^ Cullen 2008, p. 50
- ^ Cullen 2008, p. 161, and Hindmarsh et al. 2008, p. 2092
- ^ a b «L’Empire et le Saint-Siège». Napoleon.org. Archived from the original on 19 September 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2011.
- ^ Wachtel, Albert (1992). The Cracked Lookingglass: James Joyce and the Nightmare of History. Susquehanna University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-945636-27-4.
- ^ Joyce, James (2005). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Collector’s Library. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-904919-54-4.
- ^ «Napoleon’s «divorce»«. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
- ^ «catholictextbookproject.com». Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
- ^ Bledsoe, Albert Taylor; Herrick, Sophia M’Ilvaine Bledsoe (1871). «The Responsibility of Men for their Belief». The Southern review, Volume 9. p. 528. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
- ^ Confidential Correspondence of the Emperor Napoleon and the Empress Josephine: Including Letters from the Time of Their Marriage Until the Death of Josephine, and Also Several Private Letters from the Emperor to His Brother Joseph, and Other Important Personages. With Numerous Illustrative Notes … Mason Brothers. 1856. p. 359.
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and I have founded empires. But on what did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. Jesus Christ founded his empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for him
- ^ Cyclopædia of Moral and Religious Anecdote [abridged from the larger «Cyclopædia» of K. Arvine], with an introductory essay by the Rev. George Cheever. J. J. Griffin & Company. 1851. p. 58.
- ^ Cases, Emmanuel-Auguste-Dieudonné comte de Las (1855). Memoirs of the Life, Exile, and Conversations of the Emperor Napoleon. Redfield.
- ^ William Roberts, «Napoleon, the Concordat of 1801, and Its Consequences». in by Frank J. Coppa, ed., Controversial Concordats: The Vatican’s Relations with Napoleon, Mussolini, and Hitler (1999) pp. 34–80.
- ^ Nigel Aston, Religion and revolution in France, 1780–1804 (Catholic University of America Press, 2000) pp. 279–315
- ^ Nigel Aston, Christianity and revolutionary Europe, 1750–1830 (Cambridge University Press, 2002) pp. 261–62.
- ^ Luis Granados (2012). Damned Good Company. Humanist Press. pp. 182–83. ISBN 978-0-931779-24-4. Archived from the original on 22 September 2015.
- ^ a b «When Napoleon Captured the Pope». The New York Times. 13 December 1981. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
- ^ «Napoleon and the Pope: From the Concordat to the Excommunication». Archived from the original on 24 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ «Concordat Of Fontainebleau». Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
- ^ «Pius VII | pope». Archived from the original on 2 May 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2017.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 436
- ^ a b Green, David B. (9 February 2014). «This Day in Jewish History / The Sanhedrin of Paris Convenes at the Behest of Napoleon». Haaretz. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
- ^ Schwarzfuchs 1979, p. 50
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 315
- ^ «Napoleon Bonaparte». A few famous freemasons. Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon A.F. & A. M. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
- ^ Pieter Geyl, Napoleon, For and Against (1982)
- ^ George F.E. Rudé (1988). The French Revolution. Grove Weidenfeld. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-8021-3272-7. Archived from the original on 26 September 2015.
- ^ Jack Coggins (1966). Soldiers And Warriors: An Illustrated History. Courier Dover Publications. p. 187. ISBN 978-0-486-45257-9.
- ^ Sally Waller (2002). France in Revolution, 1776–1830. Heinemann. p. 188. ISBN 978-0-435-32732-3.
- ^ See David Chandler, «General Introduction» to his The Campaigns of Napoleon: The Mind and Method of History’s Greatest Soldier (1975).
- ^ Price, Munro (2014). «1: Napoleon and his Empire, December 1812». Napoleon: The End of Glory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-19-966080-3.
- ^ Roberts, Napoleon: A Life (2014) pp. 470–73
- ^ Gregory R. Copley (2007). The Art of Victory: Strategies for Personal Success and Global Survival in a Changing World. Simon and Schuster. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-4165-2478-6.
- ^ Dwyer 2013, pp. 175–76
- ^ Ellis, Geoffrey (16 May 2003). The Napoleonic Empire. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 125. ISBN 978-1-4039-4401-6.
- ^ J. M. Thompson, Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall (1954), p. 285
- ^ Christopher Hibbert (1999). Wellington: A Personal History. Da Capo Press. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-7382-0148-1.
- ^ Steven Englund, Napoleon: A Political Life (2004), pp. 379ff
- ^ van Crevald, Martin (1987). Command in War. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-674-14441-5.
- ^ «Napoleon Bonaparte (Character)». Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 18 November 2017. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ Bell 2007, p. 13
- ^ «Most Popular Napoleon Bonaparte Movies and TV Shows». Internet Movie Database. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ The German original, der größte Meister des Machiavellismus, means «the greatest master of Machiavellism» but is mistranslated and misspelled with capitalization as «the greatest Maestro of Machiavellism» in Bourke, Skinner, Richard, Quentin; Kelly, Duncan (2016). «11: Popular sovereignty as state theory in the nineteenth century». Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. University Printing House, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 280–281. ISBN 978-1-107-13040-1.
- ^ The Fortnightly, Volume 114. Chapman and Hall, 1923. p. 836.
- ^ Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne. «Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte.» Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1889. Vol. 1, p. 7.
- ^ Kircheisen, F. M. Napoleon New York : Harcourt, Brace, 1932
- ^ Davydov, Denis. In the Service of the Tsar Against Napoleon: The Memoirs of Denis Davydov, 1806–1814. Translation by Gregory Troubetzkoy. Greenhill Books, 1999. p. 64.
- ^ «Greatest cartooning coup of all time: The Brit who convinced everyone Napoleon was short». National Post. 28 April 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2017.
- ^ Roberts 2004, p. 93
- ^ «Was Napoleon Short? | Britannica». www.britannica.com. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ a b c Owen Connelly (2006). Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military Campaigns. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- ^ «The Myth of Napoleon’s Height: How a Single Image Can Change History». Entity. 13 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 January 2018. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
- ^ Seward, Desmond. Napoleon’s Family. New York: Viking, 1986.
- ^ The Bookman, Vol. 29, p. 304. Diary of Capt. Ross, commander of the Northumberland.
- ^ Bordes 2007, p. 118.
- ^ Hall 2006, p. 181
- ^ a b McGraw-Hill’s, US History 2012, pp. 112–13[clarification needed]
- ^ Blaufarb 2007, pp. 101–02
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 255
- ^ Bernard Schwartz (1998). The Code Napoleon and the Common-law World. The Lawbook Exchange. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-886363-59-5. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
- ^ Wood 2007, p. 55
- ^ Scheck 2008, Chapter: The Road to National Unification
- ^ Astarita 2005, p. 264
- ^ Alter 2006, pp. 61–76
- ^ Robert R. Palmer and Joel Colton, A History of the Modern World (New York: McGraw Hill, 1995), pp. 428–29
- ^ a b Archer et al. 2002, p. 397
- ^ Flynn 2001, p. 16
- ^ McConachy, Bruce (2001). «The Roots of Artillery Doctrine: Napoleonic Artillery Tactics Reconsidered» (PDF). The Journal of Military History. 65 (3): 617–640. doi:10.2307/2677528. JSTOR 2677528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2012.
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 383
- ^ John Shy, «Jomini» in Peter Paret, ed. Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (1986).
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 380
- ^ Roberts 2001, p. 272
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 404
- ^ Hallock, William; Wade, Herbert T (1906). «Outlines of the evolution of weights and measures and the metric system». London: The Macmillan Company. pp. 66–69.
- ^ Denis Février. «Un historique du mètre» (in French). Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie. Archived from the original on 28 February 2011. Retrieved 10 March 2011.
- ^ Thierry Sabot (1 October 2000). «Les poids et mesures sous l’Ancien Régime» [The weights and measures of the Ancien Régime] (in French). histoire-genealogie. Archived from the original on 5 December 2010. Retrieved 10 February 2011.
- ^ O’Connor 2003
- ^ Clive Emsley (2014). Napoleon: Conquest, Reform and Reorganisation. Routledge. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-317-61028-1. Archived from the original on 18 October 2015.
- ^ a b Williams, L. Pearce (1956). «Science, Education and Napoleon I». Isis. 47 (4): 369–382. doi:10.1086/348507. JSTOR 226629. S2CID 144112149.
- ^ Margaret Bradley, «Scientific education versus military training: the influence of Napoleon Bonaparte on the École Polytechnique». Annals of science (1975) 32#5 pp. 415–49.
- ^ Roberts 2014, pp. 278–81
- ^ Hastings, Max (31 October 2014). «Everything is Owed to Glory». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 13 November 2014.
- ^ Charles Esdaile, Napoleon’s Wars: An International History 1803–1815 (2008), p. 39
- ^ Colin S. Gray (2007). War, Peace and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History. Routledge. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-134-16951-1. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 666
- ^ Repa, Jan (2 December 2005). «Furore over Austerlitz ceremony». BBC. Archived from the original on 20 April 2010. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
- ^ Bourke, Skinner, Richard, Quentin; Garstan, Bryan (2016). «10: From popular sovereignty to civil society in post-revolutionary France». Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. University Printing House, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 254–255, 258–259. ISBN 978-1-107-13040-1.
- ^ Poulos 2000
- ^ Geyl 1947
- ^ Dwyer 2008b
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. xliii.
- ^ Hanson 2003
- ^ Cronin 1994, pp. 342–43
- ^ Correlli Barnett, Bonaparte (1978)
- ^ Jean Tulard, Napoleon: The Myth of the Saviour (1984)
- ^ Bergeron, Louis (1981). France Under Napoleon. Princeton U.P. ISBN 978-0-691-00789-2.
- ^ Dominic Lieven, «Review article: Russia and the defeat of Napoleon.» Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History (2006) 7#2 pp. 283–308.
- ^ Robert S. Alexander, Napoleon (Oxford University Press, 2001), examines major debates among historians.
- ^ Western Society for French History (1974). Proceedings of the … Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History. Issues for have subtitle:Selected papers of the … Annual Meeting. Las Cruces, N.M.: New Mexico State University Press.
- ^ John Dunne, «Recent Napoleonic Historiography: ‘Poor Relation’ Makes Good?» French History (2004) 18#4 pp. 484–91.
- ^ Alan Forrest, «Propaganda and the Legitimation of Power in Napoleonic France». French History, 2004 18(4): 426–45
- ^ Richardson, Hubert N. B. (1920). A dictionary of Napoleon and his times. University of California Libraries. London, New York [etc.] : Cassell and company, ltd.
- ^ Mark, Bryant, «Broadsides against Boney.» History Today 60.1 (2010): 52+
- ^ Mark Bryant, Napoleonic Wars in Cartoons (Grub Street, 2009).
- ^ a b Sudhir Hazareesingh, «Memory and Political Imagination: the Legend of Napoleon Revisited». French History, 2004 18(4): 463–83
- ^ a b Venita Datta, «‘L’appel Au Soldat’: Visions of the Napoleonic Legend in Popular Culture of the Belle Epoque». French Historical Studies 2005 28(1): 1–30
- ^ «Call for Papers: International Napoleonic Society, Fourth International Napoleonic Congress». La Fondation Napoléon. Archived from the original on 8 January 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2008.
- ^ Laurent, Ottavi (8 February 2012). «A New Napoleonic Campaign for Montereau». Foundation Napoleon. Archived from the original on 29 September 2013.
- ^ Grab 2003, country by country analysis
- ^ «Napoleonic Code». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 29 December 2011. Retrieved 13 April 2012.
- ^ Lobingier, Charles Sumner (December 1918). «Napoleon and His Code». Harvard Law Review. 32 (2): 114–134. doi:10.2307/1327640. ISSN 0017-811X. JSTOR 1327640.
- ^ Andrzej Nieuwazny, «Napoleon and Polish identity». History Today, May 1998 vol. 48 no. 5 pp. 50–55
- ^ «The Crisis of 1808». www.brown.edu. Brown University. Retrieved 6 May 2021.
- ^ «Яндекс». yandex.ru. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ «Biography of Joesephine de Beauharnais». Archived from the original on 28 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 117
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 271
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 118
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 284
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 188
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 100
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 663
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 630
- ^ Lucotte, Gérard; Macé, Jacques & Hrechdakian, Peter (September 2013). «Reconstruction of the Lineage Y Chromosome Haplotype of Napoléon the First» (PDF). International Journal of Sciences. 2 (9): 127–39. ISSN 2305-3925. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 April 2014.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 423
References
Biographical studies
- Abbott, John (2005). Life of Napoleon Bonaparte. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4179-7063-6.
- Bell, David A. (2015). Napoleon: A Concise Biography. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6. only 140pp; by a scholar
- Blaufarb, Rafe (2007). Napoleon: Symbol for an Age, A Brief History with Documents. Bedford. ISBN 978-0-312-43110-5.
- Broers, Michael (2015). Napoleon: Soldier of Destiny. Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0571273454.
- Chandler, David (2002). Napoleon. Leo Cooper. ISBN 978-0-85052-750-6.
- Cronin, Vincent (1994). Napoleon. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-637521-0.
- Dwyer, Philip (2008a). Napoleon: The Path to Power. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300137545.
- Dwyer, Philip (2013). Citizen Emperor: Napoleon in Power. Yale University Press. ASIN B00GGSG3W4.
- Englund, Steven (2010). Napoleon: A Political Life. Scribner. ISBN 978-0-674-01803-7.
- Gueniffey, Patrice. Bonaparte: 1769–1802 (Harvard UP, 2015, French edition 2013); 1008 pp.; vol 1 of most comprehensive recent scholarly biography by leading French specialist; less emphasis on battles and campaigns excerpt; also online review
- Johnson, Paul (2002). Napoleon: A life. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-670-03078-1.; 200 pp.; quite hostile
- Lefebvre, Georges (1969). Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit, 1799–1807. Columbia University Press. influential wide-ranging history
- Lefebvre, Georges (1969). Napoleon: from Tilsit to Waterloo, 1807–1815. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231033138.
- Lyons, Martyn (1994). Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. St. Martin’s Press.
- Markham, Felix (1963). Napoleon. Mentor.; 303 pp.; short biography by an Oxford scholar online
- McLynn, Frank (1998). Napoleon. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-6247-5. ASIN 0712662472.
- Roberts, Andrew (2014). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group. ISBN 978-0-670-02532-9.
- Thompson, J.M. (1951). Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall. Oxford U.P., 412 pp.; by an Oxford scholar
- Zamoyski, Adam (2018). Napoleon: The Man Behind The Myth. Great Britain: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-811607-1.
Primary sources
- Babelon, Jean-Pierre, D’Huart, Suzanne and De Jonge, Alex. Napoleon’s Last Will and Testament. Paddington Press Ltd. New York & London. 1977. ISBN 0-448-22190-X.
- Broadley, A. M., and J. Holland Rose. Napoleon in caricature 1795–1821 (John Lane, 1911) online, illustrated
- Gourgaud, Gaspard (1903) [1899]. Talks of Napoleon at St. Helena. Translated from the French by Elizabeth Wormeley Latimer. Chicago: A.C. McClurg.
Historiography and memory
- Broadley, Alexander Meyrick (1911). Napoleon in Caricature 1795-1821. John Lane, 1911 Caricature.
- Dwyer, Philip G. (2004). «Napoleon Bonaparte as Hero and Saviour: Image, Rhetoric and Behaviour in the Construction of a Legend». French History. 18 (4): 379–403. doi:10.1093/fh/18.4.379.
- Dwyer, Philip (2008b). «Remembering and Forgetting in Contemporary France: Napoleon, Slavery, and the French History Wars». French Politics, Culture & Society. 26 (3): 110–22. doi:10.3167/fpcs.2008.260306.
- Englund, Steven. «Napoleon and Hitler». Journal of the Historical Society (2006) 6#1 pp. 151–69.
- Geyl, Pieter (1982) [1947]. Napoleon For and Against. Penguin Books.
- Hanson, Victor Davis (2003). «The Claremont Institute: The Little Tyrant, A review of Napoleon: A Penguin Life«. The Claremont Institute.
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir (2005). The Legend of Napoleon. excerpt and text search
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir. «Memory and Political Imagination: The Legend of Napoleon Revisited», French History (2004) 18#4 pp. 463–83.
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir (2005). «Napoleonic Memory in Nineteenth-Century France: The Making of a Liberal Legend». MLN. 120 (4): 747–73. doi:10.1353/mln.2005.0119. S2CID 154508777.
- Porterfield, Todd, and Susan Siegfried. Staging Empire: Napoleon, Ingres, and David (Penn State Press, 2006). online review.
Specialty studies
- Alder, Ken (2002). The Measure of All Things – The Seven-Year Odyssey and Hidden Error That Transformed the World. Free Press. ISBN 978-0-7432-1675-3.
- Alter, Peter (2006). T. C. W. Blanning and Hagen Schulze (ed.). Unity and Diversity in European Culture c. 1800. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-726382-2.
- Amini, Iradj (2000). Napoleon and Persia. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-934211-58-1.
- Archer, Christon I.; Ferris, John R.; Herwig, Holger H. (2002). World History of Warfare. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-4423-8.
- Astarita, Tommaso (2005). Between Salt Water And Holy Water: A History Of Southern Italy. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-05864-2.
- Bell, David (2007). The First Total War. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-618-34965-4.
- Bordes, Philippe (2007). Jacques-Louis David. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12346-3.
- Brooks, Richard (2000). Atlas of World Military History. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-7607-2025-7.
- Chandler, David (1966). The Campaigns of Napoleon. New York: Scribner. ISBN 978-0-02-523660-8. OCLC 740560411.
- Chandler, David (1973) [1966]. Napoleon. ISBN 978-0841502543.
- Chesney, Charles (2006). Waterloo Lectures:A Study Of The Campaign Of 1815. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4286-4988-0.
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2018). Napoleon’s 1796 Italian Campaign. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2676-2
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2020). Napoleon Absent, Coalition Ascendant: The 1799 Campaign in Italy and Switzerland, Volume 1. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-3025-7
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2021). The Coalition Crumbles, Napoleon Returns: The 1799 Campaign in Italy and Switzerland, Volume 2. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-3034-9
- Connelly, Owen (2006). Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military Campaigns. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- Cordingly, David (2004). The Billy Ruffian: The Bellerophon and the Downfall of Napoleon. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-58234-468-3.
- Cullen, William (2008). Is Arsenic an Aphrodisiac?. Royal Society of Chemistry. ISBN 978-0-85404-363-7.
- Dobi.A. 1974. “For the Emperor-Bibliophile, Only the Very Best.” Wilson Library Bulletin 49 (November): 229–33.
- Driskel, Paul (1993). As Befits a Legend. Kent State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87338-484-1.
- Esdaile, Charles J. (2003). The Peninsular War: A New History. Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-6231-7.
- Flynn, George Q. (2001). Conscription and democracy: The Draft in France, Great Britain, and the United States. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-31912-9.
- Fremont-Barnes, Gregory; Fisher, Todd (2004). The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-831-1.
- Fulghum, Neil (2007). «Death Mask of Napoleon». University of North Carolina. Archived from the original on 26 July 2013. Retrieved 4 August 2008.
- Gates, David (2001). The Spanish Ulcer: A History of the Peninsular War. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-81083-1.
- Gates, David (2003). The Napoleonic Wars, 1803–1815. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-0719-3.
- Gill, John H. (2014). 1809: Thunder on the Danube – Napoleon’s Defeat of the Habsburgs, Vol. 1. London: Frontline Books. ISBN 978-184415-713-6.
- Glover, Richard (1967). «The French Fleet, 1807–1814; Britain’s Problem; and Madison’s Opportunity». The Journal of Modern History. 39 (3): 233–52. doi:10.1086/240080. S2CID 143376566.
- Godechot, Jacques; et al. (1971). The Napoleonic era in Europe. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN 978-0-03-084166-8.
- Grab, Alexander (2003). Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-68275-3.
- Hall, Stephen (2006). Size Matters. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-618-47040-2.
- Harvey, Robert (2006). The War of Wars. Robinson. ISBN 978-1-84529-635-3.
- Hindmarsh, J. Thomas; Savory, John (2008). «The Death of Napoleon, Cancer or Arsenic?». Clinical Chemistry. 54 (12): 2092. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.117358. Archived from the original on 26 December 2010. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
- Karsh, Inari (2001). Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East, 1789–1923. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-00541-9.
- Mowat, R.B. (1924) The Diplomacy of Napoleon (1924) 350 pp. online
- O’Connor, J; Robertson, E F (2003). «The history of measurement». St Andrew’s University. Retrieved 18 July 2008.
- Poulos, Anthi (2000). «1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict». International Journal of Legal Information (vol 28 ed.). 28: 1–44. doi:10.1017/S0731126500008842. S2CID 159202400.
- Richardson, Hubert N.B. A Dictionary of Napoleon and His Times (1921) online free 489pp
- Roberts, Chris (2004). Heavy Words Lightly Thrown. Granta. ISBN 978-1-86207-765-2.
- Schom, Alan (1997). Napoleon Bonaparte. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-017214-5.
- Schroeder, Paul W. (1996). The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848. Oxford U.P. pp. 177–560. ISBN 978-0-19-820654-5. advanced diplomatic history of Napoleon and his era
- Schwarzfuchs, Simon (1979). Napoleon, the Jews and the Sanhedrin. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-19-710023-3.
- Watson, William (2003). Tricolor and crescent. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-275-97470-1. Retrieved 12 June 2009.
- Sicker, Martin (2001). The Islamic World in Decline: From the Treaty of Karlowitz to the Disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. Greenwood. p. 99. ISBN 978-0-275-96891-5.
- Wells, David (1992). The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-011813-1.
External links
- The Napoleonic Guide
- Napoleon Series
- International Napoleonic Society
- Biography by the US Public Broadcasting Service
- Works by Napoleon at Project Gutenberg
- Hit the road with Napoleon
- Rose, John Holland (1911). «Napoleon I.» . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 19 (11th ed.). pp. 190–211.
Napoleon | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries, by Jacques-Louis David, 1812 |
||||
Emperor of the French
(more…) |
||||
1st reign | 18 May 1804 – 6 April 1814 | |||
Coronation | 2 December 1804 Notre-Dame Cathedral |
|||
Successor | Louis XVIII (as King of France) |
|||
2nd reign | 20 March 1815 – 22 June 1815 | |||
Predecessor | Louis XVIII | |||
Successor | Napoleon II (disputed) or Louis XVIII | |||
King of Italy | ||||
Reign | 17 March 1805 – 11 April 1814 | |||
Coronation | 26 May 1805 Milan Cathedral |
|||
First Consul of France | ||||
In office 12 December 1799 – 18 May 1804 |
||||
Co-Consuls | Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès Charles-François Lebrun |
|||
Provisional Consul of France | ||||
In office 10 November 1799 – 12 December 1799 |
||||
Co-Consuls | Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès Roger Ducos |
|||
President of the Italian Republic | ||||
In office 26 January 1802 – 17 March 1805 |
||||
Vice President | Francesco Melzi d’Eril | |||
Protector of the Confederation of the Rhine | ||||
In office 12 July 1806 – 4 November 1813 |
||||
Prince-Primates | Karl von Dalberg Eugène de Beauharnais |
|||
Born | Napoleone Buonaparte[1] 15 August 1769 Ajaccio, Corsica, Kingdom of France |
|||
Died | 5 May 1821 (aged 51) Longwood, Saint Helena, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland |
|||
Burial | 15 December 1840
Les Invalides, Paris, France |
|||
Spouse |
Joséphine de Beauharnais (m. ; div. ) Marie Louise of Austria (m. ; separated 1814) |
|||
Issue Detail |
|
|||
|
||||
House | Bonaparte | |||
Father | Carlo Buonaparte | |||
Mother | Letizia Ramolino | |||
Signature |
Rescale the fullscreen map to see Saint Helena
Napoleon Bonaparte[a] (born Napoleone Buonaparte; 15 August 1769 – 5 May 1821), later known by his regnal name Napoleon I,[b] was a French military commander and political leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and led successful campaigns during the Revolutionary Wars. He was the de facto leader of the French Republic as First Consul from 1799 to 1804, then Emperor of the French from 1804 until 1814 and again in 1815. Napoleon’s political and cultural legacy endures to this day, as a highly celebrated and controversial leader. He initiated many liberal reforms that have persisted in society, and is considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His wars and campaigns are studied by militaries all over the world. Between three and six million civilians and soldiers perished in what became known as the Napoleonic Wars.[2][3]
Napoleon was born on the island of Corsica, not long after its annexation by France, to a native family descending from minor Italian nobility.[4][5] He supported the French Revolution in 1789 while serving in the French army, and tried to spread its ideals to his native Corsica. He rose rapidly in the Army after he saved the governing French Directory by firing on royalist insurgents. In 1796, he began a military campaign against the Austrians and their Italian allies, scoring decisive victories and becoming a national hero. Two years later, he led a military expedition to Egypt that served as a springboard to political power. He engineered a coup in November 1799 and became First Consul of the Republic.
Differences with the United Kingdom meant France faced the War of the Third Coalition by 1805. Napoleon shattered this coalition with victories in the Ulm campaign, and at the Battle of Austerlitz, which led to the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. In 1806, the Fourth Coalition took up arms against him. Napoleon defeated Prussia at the battles of Jena and Auerstedt, marched the Grande Armée into Eastern Europe, and defeated the Russians in June 1807 at Friedland, forcing the defeated nations of the Fourth Coalition to accept the Treaties of Tilsit. Two years later, the Austrians challenged the French again during the War of the Fifth Coalition, but Napoleon solidified his grip over Europe after triumphing at the Battle of Wagram.
Hoping to extend the Continental System, his embargo against Britain, Napoleon invaded the Iberian Peninsula and declared his brother Joseph the King of Spain in 1808. The Spanish and the Portuguese revolted in the Peninsular War aided by a British army, culminating in defeat for Napoleon’s marshals. Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia in the summer of 1812. The resulting campaign witnessed the catastrophic retreat of Napoleon’s Grande Armée. In 1813, Prussia and Austria joined Russian forces in a Sixth Coalition against France, resulting in a large coalition army defeating Napoleon at the Battle of Leipzig. The coalition invaded France and captured Paris, forcing Napoleon to abdicate in April 1814. He was exiled to the island of Elba, between Corsica and Italy. In France, the Bourbons were restored to power.
Napoleon escaped in February 1815 and took control of France.[6] The Allies responded by forming a Seventh Coalition, which defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. The British exiled him to the remote island of Saint Helena in the Atlantic, where he died in 1821 at the age of 51.
Napoleon had an extensive impact on the modern world, bringing liberal reforms to the lands he conquered, especially the regions of the Low Countries, Switzerland and parts of modern Italy and Germany. He implemented many liberal policies in France and Western Europe.[c] British historian Andrew Roberts summarizes these ideas as follows:
The ideas that underpin our modern world—meritocracy, equality before the law, property rights, religious toleration, modern secular education, sound finances, and so on—were championed, consolidated, codified and geographically extended by Napoleon. To them he added a rational and efficient local administration, an end to rural banditry, the encouragement of science and the arts, the abolition of feudalism and the greatest codification of laws since the fall of the Roman Empire.[13]
Early life
Napoleon’s family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family who emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a minor Genoese noble family.[14] The Buonapartes were also the relatives, by marriage and by birth, of the Pietrasentas, Costas, Paraviccinis, and Bonellis, all Corsican families of the interior.[15] His parents Carlo Maria di Buonaparte and Maria Letizia Ramolino maintained an ancestral home called «Casa Buonaparte» in Ajaccio. Napoleon was born there on 15 August 1769. He was the fourth child and third son of the family.[d] He had an elder brother, Joseph, and younger siblings Lucien, Elisa, Louis, Pauline, Caroline, and Jérôme. Napoleon was baptised as a Catholic, under the name Napoleone.[16] In his youth, his name was also spelled as Nabulione, Nabulio, Napolionne, and Napulione.[17]
Napoleon was born in the same year that the Republic of Genoa (former Italian state) ceded the region of Corsica to France.[18] The state sold sovereign rights a year before his birth and the island was conquered by France during the year of his birth. It was formally incorporated as a province in 1770, after 500 years under Genoese rule and 14 years of independence.[e] Napoleon’s parents joined the Corsican resistance and fought against the French to maintain independence, even when Maria was pregnant with him. His father Carlo was an attorney who had supported and actively collaborated with patriot Pasquale Paoli during the Corsican war of independence against France;[5] after the Corsican defeat at Ponte Novu in 1769 and Paoli’s exile in Britain, Carlo began working for the new French government and went on to be named representative of the island to the court of Louis XVI in 1777.[5][22]
The dominant influence of Napoleon’s childhood was his mother, whose firm discipline restrained a rambunctious child.[22] Later in life, Napoleon stated, «The future destiny of the child is always the work of the mother.»[23] Napoleon’s maternal grandmother had married into the Swiss Fesch family in her second marriage, and Napoleon’s uncle, the cardinal Joseph Fesch, would fulfill a role as protector of the Bonaparte family for some years. Napoleon’s noble, moderately affluent background afforded him greater opportunities to study than were available to a typical Corsican of the time.[24]
Statue of Napoleon as a schoolboy in Brienne, aged 15, by Louis Rochet [fr] (1853)
When he turned 9 years old,[25][26] he moved to the French mainland and enrolled at a religious school in Autun in January 1779. In May, he transferred with a scholarship to a military academy at Brienne-le-Château.[27] In his youth he was an outspoken Corsican nationalist and supported the state’s independence from France.[25][28] Like many Corsicans, Napoleon spoke and read Corsican (as his mother tongue) and Italian (as the official language of Corsica).[29][30][31][28] He began learning French in school at around age 10.[32] Although he became fluent in French, he spoke with a distinctive Corsican accent and never learned how to spell correctly in French.[33] Consequently, Napoleon was treated unfairly by his schoolmates.[28] He was, however, not an isolated case, as it was estimated in 1790 that fewer than 3 million people, out of France’s population of 28 million, were able to speak standard French, and those who could write it were even fewer.[34]
Napoleon was routinely bullied by his peers for his accent, birthplace, short stature, mannerisms and inability to speak French quickly.[30] He became reserved and melancholy, applying himself to reading. An examiner observed that Napoleon «has always been distinguished for his application in mathematics. He is fairly well acquainted with history and geography … This boy would make an excellent sailor».[f][36]
One story told of Napoleon at the school is that he led junior students to victory against senior students in a snowball fight, showing his leadership abilities.[37] In early adulthood, Napoleon briefly intended to become a writer; he authored a history of Corsica and a romantic novella.[25]
On completion of his studies at Brienne in 1784, Napoleon was admitted to the École Militaire in Paris. He trained to become an artillery officer and, when his father’s death reduced his income, was forced to complete the two-year course in one year.[38] He was the first Corsican to graduate from the École Militaire.[38] He was examined by the famed scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace.[39]
Early career
Upon graduating in September 1785, Bonaparte was commissioned a second lieutenant in La Fère artillery regiment.[g][27] He served in Valence and Auxonne until after the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789. Bonaparte was a fervent Corsican nationalist during this period.[41] He asked for leave to join his mentor Pasquale Paoli, when Paoli was allowed to return to Corsica by the National Assembly. Paoli had no sympathy for Napoleon, however, as he deemed his father a traitor for having deserted his cause for Corsican independence.[42]
He spent the early years of the Revolution in Corsica, fighting in a complex three-way struggle among royalists, revolutionaries, and Corsican nationalists. Napoleon came to embrace the ideals of the Revolution, becoming a supporter of the Jacobins and joining the pro-French Corsican Republicans who opposed Paoli’s policy and his aspirations of secession.[43] He was given command over a battalion of volunteers and was promoted to captain in the regular army in July 1792, despite exceeding his leave of absence and leading a riot against French troops.[44]
When Corsica declared formal secession from France and requested the protection of the British government, Napoleon and his commitment to the French Revolution came into conflict with Paoli, who had decided to sabotage the Corsican contribution to the Expédition de Sardaigne, by preventing a French assault on the Sardinian island of La Maddalena.[45] Bonaparte and his family were compelled to flee to Toulon on the French mainland in June 1793 because of the split with Paoli.[46]
Although he was born «Napoleone Buonaparte», it was after this that Napoleon began styling himself «Napoléon Bonaparte». His family did not drop the name Buonaparte until 1796. The first known record of him signing his name as Bonaparte was at the age of 27 (in 1796).[47][16][48]
Siege of Toulon
In July 1793, Bonaparte published a pro-republican pamphlet entitled Le souper de Beaucaire (Supper at Beaucaire) which gained him the support of Augustin Robespierre, the younger brother of the Revolutionary leader Maximilien Robespierre. With the help of his fellow Corsican Antoine Christophe Saliceti, Bonaparte was appointed senior gunner and artillery commander of the republican forces which arrived on 8 September at Toulon.[49][50]
He adopted a plan to capture a hill where republican guns could dominate the city’s harbour and force the British to evacuate. The assault on the position led to the capture of the city, and during it Bonaparte was wounded in the thigh on 16 December. Catching the attention of the Committee of Public Safety, he was put in charge of the artillery of France’s Army of Italy.[51] On 22 December he was on his way to his new post in Nice, promoted from the rank of colonel to brigadier general at the age of 24. He devised plans for attacking the Kingdom of Sardinia as part of France’s campaign against the First Coalition.
The French army carried out Bonaparte’s plan in the Battle of Saorgio in April 1794, and then advanced to seize Ormea in the mountains. From Ormea, they headed west to outflank the Austro-Sardinian positions around Saorge. After this campaign, Augustin Robespierre sent Bonaparte on a mission to the Republic of Genoa to determine that country’s intentions towards France.[52]
13 Vendémiaire
Some contemporaries alleged that Bonaparte was put under house arrest at Nice for his association with the Robespierres following their fall in the Thermidorian Reaction in July 1794. Napoleon’s secretary Bourrienne disputed the allegation in his memoirs. According to Bourrienne, jealousy was responsible, between the Army of the Alps and the Army of Italy, with whom Napoleon was seconded at the time.[53] Bonaparte dispatched an impassioned defence in a letter to the commissar Saliceti, and he was acquitted of any wrongdoing.[54] He was released within two weeks (on 20 August) and due to his technical skills, was asked to draw up plans to attack Italian positions in the context of France’s war with Austria. He also took part in an expedition to take back Corsica from the British, but the French were repulsed by the British Royal Navy.[55]
By 1795, Bonaparte had become engaged to Désirée Clary, daughter of François Clary. Désirée’s sister Julie Clary had married Bonaparte’s elder brother Joseph.[56] In April 1795, he was assigned to the Army of the West, which was engaged in the War in the Vendée—a civil war and royalist counter-revolution in Vendée, a region in west-central France on the Atlantic Ocean. As an infantry command, it was a demotion from artillery general—for which the army already had a full quota—and he pleaded poor health to avoid the posting.[57]
He was moved to the Bureau of Topography of the Committee of Public Safety. He sought unsuccessfully to be transferred to Constantinople in order to offer his services to the Sultan.[58] During this period, he wrote the romantic novella Clisson et Eugénie, about a soldier and his lover, in a clear parallel to Bonaparte’s own relationship with Désirée.[59] On 15 September, Bonaparte was removed from the list of generals in regular service for his refusal to serve in the Vendée campaign. He faced a difficult financial situation and reduced career prospects.[60]
On 3 October, royalists in Paris declared a rebellion against the National Convention.[61] Paul Barras, a leader of the Thermidorian Reaction, knew of Bonaparte’s military exploits at Toulon and gave him command of the improvised forces in defence of the convention in the Tuileries Palace. Napoleon had seen the massacre of the King’s Swiss Guard there three years earlier and realized that artillery would be the key to its defence.[27]
He ordered a young cavalry officer named Joachim Murat to seize large cannons and used them to repel the attackers on 5 October 1795—13 Vendémiaire An IV in the French Republican Calendar. 1,400 royalists died and the rest fled.[61] He cleared the streets with «a whiff of grapeshot», according to 19th-century historian Thomas Carlyle in The French Revolution: A History.[62][63]
The defeat of the royalist insurrection extinguished the threat to the Convention and earned Bonaparte sudden fame, wealth, and the patronage of the new government, the Directory. Murat married one of Napoleon’s sisters, becoming his brother-in-law; he also served under Napoleon as one of his generals. Bonaparte was promoted to Commander of the Interior and given command of the Army of Italy.[46]
Within weeks, he was romantically involved with Joséphine de Beauharnais, the former mistress of Barras. The couple married on 9 March 1796 in a civil ceremony.[64]
First Italian campaign
Two days after the marriage, Bonaparte left Paris to take command of the Army of Italy. He immediately went on the offensive, hoping to defeat the forces of Piedmont before their Austrian allies could intervene. In a series of rapid victories during the Montenotte Campaign, he knocked Piedmont out of the war in two weeks. The French then focused on the Austrians for the remainder of the war, the highlight of which became the protracted struggle for Mantua. The Austrians launched a series of offensives against the French to break the siege, but Napoleon defeated every relief effort, scoring victories at the battles of Castiglione, Bassano, Arcole, and Rivoli. The decisive French triumph at Rivoli in January 1797 led to the collapse of the Austrian position in Italy. At Rivoli, the Austrians lost up to 14,000 men while the French lost about 5,000.[65]
The next phase of the campaign featured the French invasion of the Habsburg heartlands. French forces in Southern Germany had been defeated by the Archduke Charles in 1796, but the Archduke withdrew his forces to protect Vienna after learning about Napoleon’s assault. In the first encounter between the two commanders, Napoleon pushed back his opponent and advanced deep into Austrian territory after winning at the Battle of Tarvis in March 1797. The Austrians were alarmed by the French thrust that reached all the way to Leoben, about 100 km from Vienna, and decided to sue for peace.[66]
The Treaty of Leoben, followed by the more comprehensive Treaty of Campo Formio, gave France control of most of northern Italy and the Low Countries, and a secret clause promised the Republic of Venice to Austria. Bonaparte marched on Venice and forced its surrender, ending 1,100 years of Venetian independence. He authorized the French to loot treasures such as the Horses of Saint Mark.[67]
On the journey, Bonaparte conversed much about the warriors of antiquity, especially Alexander, Caesar, Scipio and Hannibal. He studied their strategy and combined it with his own. In a question from Bourrienne, asking whether he gave his preference to Alexander or Caesar, Napoleon said that he places Alexander the Great in the first rank, the main reason being his campaign in Asia.[68]
Bonaparte during the Italian campaign in 1797
His application of conventional military ideas to real-world situations enabled his military triumphs, such as creative use of artillery as a mobile force to support his infantry. He stated later in life:[when?] «I have fought sixty battles and I have learned nothing which I did not know at the beginning. Look at Caesar; he fought the first like the last».[69]
Bonaparte could win battles by concealment of troop deployments and concentration of his forces on the «hinge» of an enemy’s weakened front. If he could not use his favourite envelopment strategy, he would take up the central position and attack two co-operating forces at their hinge, swing round to fight one until it fled, then turn to face the other.[70] In this Italian campaign, Bonaparte’s army captured 150,000 prisoners, 540 cannons, and 170 standards.[71] The French army fought 67 actions and won 18 pitched battles through superior artillery technology and Bonaparte’s tactics.[72]
During the campaign, Bonaparte became increasingly influential in French politics. He founded two newspapers: one for the troops in his army and another for circulation in France.[73] The royalists attacked Bonaparte for looting Italy and warned that he might become a dictator.[74] Napoleon’s forces extracted an estimated $45 million in funds from Italy during their campaign there, another $12 million in precious metals and jewels. His forces confiscated more than 300 priceless paintings and sculptures.[75]
Bonaparte sent General Pierre Augereau to Paris to lead a coup d’état and purge the royalists on 4 September—the Coup of 18 Fructidor. This left Barras and his Republican allies in control again but dependent upon Bonaparte, who proceeded to peace negotiations with Austria. These negotiations resulted in the Treaty of Campo Formio. Bonaparte returned to Paris in December 1797 as a hero.[76] He met Talleyrand, France’s new Foreign Minister—who served in the same capacity for Emperor Napoleon—and they began to prepare for an invasion of Britain.[46]
Egyptian expedition
After two months of planning, Bonaparte decided that France’s naval strength was not yet sufficient to confront the British Royal Navy. He decided on a military expedition to seize Egypt and thereby undermine Britain’s access to its trade interests in India.[46] Bonaparte wished to establish a French presence in the Middle East and join forces with Tipu Sultan, the Sultan of Mysore who was an enemy of the British.[77] Napoleon assured the Directory that «as soon as he had conquered Egypt, he will establish relations with the Indian princes and, together with them, attack the English in their possessions».[78] The Directory agreed in order to secure a trade route to the Indian subcontinent.[79]
In May 1798, Bonaparte was elected a member of the French Academy of Sciences. His Egyptian expedition included a group of 167 scientists, with mathematicians, naturalists, chemists, and geodesists among them. Their discoveries included the Rosetta Stone, and their work was published in the Description de l’Égypte in 1809.[80]
En route to Egypt, Bonaparte reached Malta on 9 June 1798, then controlled by the Knights Hospitaller. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch zu Bolheim surrendered after token resistance, and Bonaparte captured an important naval base with the loss of only three men.[81]
Bonaparte and his expedition eluded pursuit by the Royal Navy and landed at Alexandria on 1 July.[46] He fought the Battle of Shubra Khit against the Mamluks, Egypt’s ruling military caste. This helped the French practise their defensive tactic for the Battle of the Pyramids, fought on 21 July, about 24 km (15 mi) from the pyramids. General Bonaparte’s forces of 25,000 roughly equalled those of the Mamluks’ Egyptian cavalry. Twenty-nine French[82] and approximately 2,000 Egyptians were killed. The victory boosted the morale of the French army.[83]
On 1 August 1798, the British fleet under Sir Horatio Nelson captured or destroyed all but two vessels of the French fleet in the Battle of the Nile, defeating Bonaparte’s goal to strengthen the French position in the Mediterranean.[84] His army had succeeded in a temporary increase of French power in Egypt, though it faced repeated uprisings.[85] In early 1799, he moved an army into the Ottoman province of Damascus (Syria and Galilee). Bonaparte led these 13,000 French soldiers in the conquest of the coastal towns of Arish, Gaza, Jaffa, and Haifa.[86] The attack on Jaffa was particularly brutal. Bonaparte discovered that many of the defenders were former prisoners of war, ostensibly on parole, so he ordered the garrison and some 1,500–2,000 prisoners to be executed by bayonet or drowning.[87] Men, women, and children were robbed and murdered for three days.[88]
Bonaparte began with an army of 13,000 men. 1,500 were reported missing, 1,200 died in combat, and thousands perished from disease—mostly bubonic plague. He failed to reduce the fortress of Acre, so he marched his army back to Egypt in May. To speed up the retreat, Bonaparte ordered plague-stricken men to be poisoned with opium. The number who died remains disputed, ranging from a low of 30 to a high of 580. He also brought out 1,000 wounded men.[89] Back in Egypt on 25 July, Bonaparte defeated an Ottoman amphibious invasion at Abukir.[90]
Ruler of France
General Bonaparte surrounded by members of the Council of Five Hundred during the Coup of 18 Brumaire, by François Bouchot
While in Egypt, Bonaparte stayed informed of European affairs. He learned that France had suffered a series of defeats in the War of the Second Coalition.[91] On 24 August 1799, fearing that the Republic’s future was in doubt, he took advantage of the temporary departure of British ships from French coastal ports and set sail for France, despite the fact that he had received no explicit orders from Paris.[92] The army was left in the charge of Jean-Baptiste Kléber.[93]
Unknown to Bonaparte, the Directory had sent him orders to return to ward off possible invasions of French soil, but poor lines of communication prevented the delivery of these messages.[91] By the time that he reached Paris in October, France’s situation had been improved by a series of victories. The Republic, however, was bankrupt and the ineffective Directory was unpopular with the French population.[94] The Directory discussed Bonaparte’s «desertion» but was too weak to punish him.[91]
Despite the failures in Egypt, Napoleon returned to a hero’s welcome. He drew together an alliance with director Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, his brother Lucien, speaker of the Council of Five Hundred Roger Ducos, director Joseph Fouché, and Talleyrand, and they overthrew the Directory by a coup d’état on 9 November 1799 («the 18th Brumaire» according to the revolutionary calendar), closing down the Council of Five Hundred. Napoleon became «first consul» for ten years, with two consuls appointed by him who had consultative voices only. His power was confirmed by the new «Constitution of the Year VIII», originally devised by Sieyès to give Napoleon a minor role, but rewritten by Napoleon, and accepted by direct popular vote (3,000,000 in favour, 1,567 opposed). The constitution preserved the appearance of a republic but, in reality, established a dictatorship.[95][96]
French Consulate
Napoleon established a political system that historian Martyn Lyons called «dictatorship by plebiscite».[97] Worried by the democratic forces unleashed by the Revolution, but unwilling to ignore them entirely, Napoleon resorted to regular electoral consultations with the French people on his road to imperial power.[97] He drafted the Constitution of the Year VIII and secured his own election as First Consul, taking up residence at the Tuileries. The constitution was approved in a rigged plebiscite held the following January, with 99.94 percent officially listed as voting «yes».[98]
Napoleon’s brother, Lucien, had falsified the returns to show that 3 million people had participated in the plebiscite. The real number was 1.5 million.[97] Political observers at the time assumed the eligible French voting public numbered about 5 million people, so the regime artificially doubled the participation rate to indicate popular enthusiasm for the consulate.[97] In the first few months of the consulate, with war in Europe still raging and internal instability still plaguing the country, Napoleon’s grip on power remained very tenuous.[99]
In the spring of 1800, Napoleon and his troops crossed the Swiss Alps into Italy, aiming to surprise the Austrian armies that had reoccupied the peninsula when Napoleon was still in Egypt.[h] After a difficult crossing over the Alps, the French army entered the plains of Northern Italy virtually unopposed.[101] While one French army approached from the north, the Austrians were busy with another stationed in Genoa, which was besieged by a substantial force. The fierce resistance of this French army, under André Masséna, gave the northern force some time to carry out their operations with little interference.[102]
After spending several days looking for each other, the two armies collided at the Battle of Marengo on 14 June. General Melas had a numerical advantage, fielding about 30,000 Austrian soldiers while Napoleon commanded 24,000 French troops.[103] The battle began favourably for the Austrians as their initial attack surprised the French and gradually drove them back. Melas stated that he had won the battle and retired to his headquarters around 3 pm, leaving his subordinates in charge of pursuing the French.[104] The French lines never broke during their tactical retreat. Napoleon constantly rode out among the troops urging them to stand and fight.[105]
Late in the afternoon, a full division under Desaix arrived on the field and reversed the tide of the battle. A series of artillery barrages and cavalry charges decimated the Austrian army, which fled over the Bormida River back to Alessandria, leaving behind 14,000 casualties.[105] The following day, the Austrian army agreed to abandon Northern Italy once more with the Convention of Alessandria, which granted them safe passage to friendly soil in exchange for their fortresses throughout the region.[105]
Although critics have blamed Napoleon for several tactical mistakes preceding the battle, they have also praised his audacity for selecting a risky campaign strategy, choosing to invade the Italian peninsula from the north when the vast majority of French invasions came from the west, near or along the coastline.[106] As David G. Chandler points out, Napoleon spent almost a year getting the Austrians out of Italy in his first campaign. In 1800, it took him only a month to achieve the same goal.[106] German strategist and field marshal Alfred von Schlieffen concluded that «Bonaparte did not annihilate his enemy but eliminated him and rendered him harmless» while attaining «the object of the campaign: the conquest of North Italy».[107]
Napoleon’s triumph at Marengo secured his political authority and boosted his popularity back home, but it did not lead to an immediate peace. Bonaparte’s brother, Joseph, led the complex negotiations in Lunéville and reported that Austria, emboldened by British support, would not acknowledge the new territory that France had acquired. As negotiations became increasingly fractious, Bonaparte gave orders to his general Moreau to strike Austria once more. Moreau and the French swept through Bavaria and scored an overwhelming victory at Hohenlinden in December 1800. As a result, the Austrians capitulated and signed the Treaty of Lunéville in February 1801. The treaty reaffirmed and expanded earlier French gains at Campo Formio.[108]
Temporary peace in Europe
After a decade of constant warfare, France and Britain signed the Treaty of Amiens in March 1802, bringing the Revolutionary Wars to an end. Amiens called for the withdrawal of British troops from recently conquered colonial territories as well as for assurances to curtail the expansionary goals of the French Republic.[102] With Europe at peace and the economy recovering, Napoleon’s popularity soared to its highest levels under the consulate, both domestically and abroad.[109] In a new plebiscite during the spring of 1802, the French public came out in huge numbers to approve a constitution that made the Consulate permanent, essentially elevating Napoleon to dictator for life.[109]
Whereas the plebiscite two years earlier had brought out 1.5 million people to the polls, the new referendum enticed 3.6 million to go and vote (72 percent of all eligible voters).[110] There was no secret ballot in 1802 and few people wanted to openly defy the regime. The constitution gained approval with over 99% of the vote.[110] His broad powers were spelled out in the new constitution: Article 1. The French people name, and the Senate proclaims Napoleon-Bonaparte First Consul for Life.[111] After 1802, he was generally referred to as Napoleon rather than Bonaparte.[40]
The 1803 Louisiana Purchase totalled 2,144,480 square kilometres (827,987 square miles), doubling the size of the United States.
The brief peace in Europe allowed Napoleon to focus on French colonies abroad. Saint-Domingue had managed to acquire a high level of political autonomy during the Revolutionary Wars, with Toussaint L’Ouverture installing himself as de facto dictator by 1801. Napoleon saw a chance to reestablish control over the colony when he signed the Treaty of Amiens. In the 18th century, Saint-Domingue had been France’s most profitable colony, producing more sugar than all the British West Indies colonies combined. However, during the Revolution, the National Convention voted to abolish slavery in February 1794.[112] Aware of the expenses required to fund his wars in Europe, Napoleon made the decision to reinstate slavery in all French Caribbean colonies. The 1794 decree had only affected the colonies of Saint-Domingue, Guadeloupe and Guiana, and did not take effect in Mauritius, Reunion and Martinique, the last of which had been captured by the British and as such remained unaffected by French law.[113]
In Guadeloupe slavery had been abolished (and its ban violently enforced) by Victor Hugues against opposition from slaveholders thanks to the 1794 law. However, when slavery was reinstated in 1802, a slave revolt broke out under the leadership of Louis Delgrès.[114] The resulting Law of 20 May had the express purpose of reinstating slavery in Saint-Domingue, Guadeloupe and French Guiana, and restored slavery throughout most of the French colonial empire (excluding Saint-Domingue) for another half a century, while the French transatlantic slave trade continued for another twenty years.[115][116][117][118][119]
Napoleon sent an expedition under his brother-in-law General Leclerc to reassert control over Saint-Domingue. Although the French managed to capture Toussaint Louverture, the expedition failed when high rates of disease crippled the French army, and Jean-Jacques Dessalines won a string of victories, first against Leclerc, and when he died from yellow fever, then against Donatien-Marie-Joseph de Vimeur, vicomte de Rochambeau, whom Napoleon sent to relieve Leclerc with another 20,000 men. In May 1803, Napoleon acknowledged defeat, and the last 8,000 French troops left the island and the slaves proclaimed an independent republic that they called Haiti in 1804. In the process, Dessalines became arguably the most successful military commander in the struggle against Napoleonic France.[120][121] Seeing the failure of his efforts in Haiti, Napoleon decided in 1803 to sell the Louisiana Territory to the United States, instantly doubling the size of the U.S. The selling price in the Louisiana Purchase was less than three cents per acre, a total of $15 million.[2][122]
The peace with Britain proved to be uneasy and controversial.[123] Britain did not evacuate Malta as promised and protested against Bonaparte’s annexation of Piedmont and his Act of Mediation, which established a new Swiss Confederation. Neither of these territories were covered by Amiens, but they inflamed tensions significantly.[124] The dispute culminated in a declaration of war by Britain in May 1803; Napoleon responded by reassembling the invasion camp at Boulogne and declaring that every British male between eighteen and sixty years old in France and its dependencies to be arrested as a prisoner of war.[125]
French Empire
During the consulate, Napoleon faced several royalist and Jacobin assassination plots, including the Conspiration des poignards (Dagger plot) in October 1800 and the Plot of the Rue Saint-Nicaise (also known as the Infernal Machine) two months later.[126] In January 1804, his police uncovered an assassination plot against him that involved Moreau and which was ostensibly sponsored by the Bourbon family, the former rulers of France. On the advice of Talleyrand, Napoleon ordered the kidnapping of the Duke of Enghien, violating the sovereignty of Baden. The Duke was quickly executed after a secret military trial, even though he had not been involved in the plot.[127] Enghien’s execution infuriated royal courts throughout Europe, becoming one of the contributing political factors for the outbreak of the Napoleonic Wars.
To expand his power, Napoleon used these assassination plots to justify the creation of an imperial system based on the Roman model. He believed that a Bourbon restoration would be more difficult if his family’s succession was entrenched in the constitution.[128] Launching yet another referendum, Napoleon was elected as Emperor of the French by a tally exceeding 99%.[110] As with the Life Consulate two years earlier, this referendum produced heavy participation, bringing out almost 3.6 million voters to the polls.[110]
A keen observer of Bonaparte’s rise to absolute power, Madame de Rémusat, explains that «men worn out by the turmoil of the Revolution […] looked for the domination of an able ruler» and that «people believed quite sincerely that Bonaparte, whether as consul or emperor, would exert his authority and save [them] from the perils of anarchy.»[129]»
Napoleon’s throne room at Fontainebleau
Napoleon’s coronation, at which Pope Pius VII officiated, took place at Notre Dame de Paris, on 2 December 1804. Two separate crowns were brought for the ceremony: a golden laurel wreath recalling the Roman Empire, and a replica of Charlemagne’s crown.[130] Napoleon entered the ceremony wearing the laurel wreath and kept it on his head throughout the proceedings.[130] For the official coronation, he raised the Charlemagne crown over his own head in a symbolic gesture, but never placed it on top because he was already wearing the golden wreath.[130] Instead he placed the crown on Josephine’s head, the event commemorated in the officially sanctioned painting by Jacques-Louis David.[130] Napoleon was crowned King of Italy, with the Iron Crown of Lombardy, at the Cathedral of Milan on 26 May 1805. He created eighteen Marshals of the Empire from among his top generals to secure the allegiance of the army on 18 May 1804, the official start of the Empire.[131]
War of the Third Coalition
Great Britain had broken the Peace of Amiens by declaring war on France in May 1803.[132] In December 1804, an Anglo-Swedish agreement became the first step towards the creation of the Third Coalition. By April 1805, Britain had also signed an alliance with Russia.[133] Austria had been defeated by France twice in recent memory and wanted revenge, so it joined the coalition a few months later.[134]
Before the formation of the Third Coalition, Napoleon had assembled an invasion force, the Armée d’Angleterre, around six camps at Boulogne in Northern France. He intended to use this invasion force to strike at England. They never invaded, but Napoleon’s troops received careful and invaluable training for future military operations.[135] The men at Boulogne formed the core for what Napoleon later called La Grande Armée. At the start, this French army had about 200,000 men organized into seven corps, which were large field units that contained 36–40 cannons each and were capable of independent action until other corps could come to the rescue.[136]
A single corps properly situated in a strong defensive position could survive at least a day without support, giving the Grande Armée countless strategic and tactical options on every campaign. On top of these forces, Napoleon created a cavalry reserve of 22,000 organized into two cuirassier divisions, four mounted dragoon divisions, one division of dismounted dragoons, and one of light cavalry, all supported by 24 artillery pieces.[137] By 1805, the Grande Armée had grown to a force of 350,000 men,[137] who were well equipped, well trained, and led by competent officers.[138]
Napoleon knew that the French fleet could not defeat the Royal Navy in a head-to-head battle, so he planned to lure it away from the English Channel through diversionary tactics.[139] The main strategic idea involved the French Navy escaping from the British blockades of Toulon and Brest and threatening to attack the British West Indies. In the face of this attack, it was hoped, the British would weaken their defence of the Western Approaches by sending ships to the Caribbean, allowing a combined Franco-Spanish fleet to take control of the English channel long enough for French armies to cross and invade.[139] However, the plan unravelled after the British victory at the Battle of Cape Finisterre in July 1805. French Admiral Villeneuve then retreated to Cádiz instead of linking up with French naval forces at Brest for an attack on the English Channel.[140]
By August 1805, Napoleon had realized that the strategic situation had changed fundamentally. Facing a potential invasion from his continental enemies, he decided to strike first and turned his army’s sights from the English Channel to the Rhine. His basic objective was to destroy the isolated Austrian armies in Southern Germany before their Russian allies could arrive. On 25 September, after great secrecy and feverish marching, 200,000 French troops began to cross the Rhine on a front of 260 km (160 mi).[141][142]
Austrian commander Karl Mack had gathered the greater part of the Austrian army at the fortress of Ulm in Swabia. Napoleon swung his forces to the southeast and the Grande Armée performed an elaborate wheeling movement that outflanked the Austrian positions. The Ulm Maneuver completely surprised General Mack, who belatedly understood that his army had been cut off. After some minor engagements that culminated in the Battle of Ulm, Mack finally surrendered after realizing that there was no way to break out of the French encirclement. For just 2,000 French casualties, Napoleon had managed to capture a total of 60,000 Austrian soldiers through his army’s rapid marching.[143] Napoleon wrote after the conflict:
«I have accomplished my object, I have destroyed the Austrian army by simply marching.»[144]
The Ulm Campaign is generally regarded as a strategic masterpiece and was influential in the development of the Schlieffen Plan in the late 19th century.[145] For the French, this spectacular victory on land was soured by the decisive victory that the Royal Navy attained at the Battle of Trafalgar on 21 October. After Trafalgar, the Royal Navy was never again seriously challenged by a French fleet in a large-scale engagement for the duration of the Napoleonic Wars.[146]
Following the Ulm Campaign, French forces managed to capture Vienna in November. The fall of Vienna provided the French a huge bounty as they captured 100,000 muskets, 500 cannons, and the intact bridges across the Danube.[147] At this critical juncture, both Tsar Alexander I and Holy Roman Emperor Francis II decided to engage Napoleon in battle, despite reservations from some of their subordinates. Napoleon sent his army north in pursuit of the Allies but then ordered his forces to retreat so that he could feign a grave weakness.[148]
Desperate to lure the Allies into battle, Napoleon gave every indication in the days preceding the engagement that the French army was in a pitiful state, even abandoning the dominant Pratzen Heights, a sloping hill near the village of Austerlitz. At the Battle of Austerlitz, in Moravia on 2 December, he deployed the French army below the Pratzen Heights and deliberately weakened his right flank, enticing the Allies to launch a major assault there in the hopes of rolling up the whole French line. A forced march from Vienna by Marshal Davout and his III Corps plugged the gap left by Napoleon just in time.[148]
Meanwhile, the heavy Allied deployment against the French right flank weakened their center on the Pratzen Heights, which was viciously attacked by the IV Corps of Marshal Soult. With the Allied center demolished, the French swept through both enemy flanks and sent the Allies fleeing chaotically, capturing thousands of prisoners in the process. The battle is often seen as a tactical masterpiece because of the near-perfect execution of a calibrated but dangerous plan—of the same stature as Cannae, the celebrated triumph by Hannibal some 2,000 years before.[148]
The Allied disaster at Austerlitz significantly shook the faith of Emperor Francis in the British-led war effort. France and Austria agreed to an armistice immediately and the Treaty of Pressburg followed shortly after on 26 December. Pressburg took Austria out of both the war and the Coalition while reinforcing the earlier treaties of Campo Formio and of Lunéville between the two powers. The treaty confirmed the Austrian loss of lands to France in Italy and Bavaria, and lands in Germany to Napoleon’s German allies.[149]
It imposed an indemnity of 40 million francs on the defeated Habsburgs and allowed the fleeing Russian troops free passage through hostile territories and back to their home soil. Napoleon went on to say, «The battle of Austerlitz is the finest of all I have fought».[150] Frank McLynn suggests that Napoleon was so successful at Austerlitz that he lost touch with reality, and what used to be French foreign policy became a «personal Napoleonic one».[151] Vincent Cronin disagrees, stating that Napoleon was not overly ambitious for himself, «he embodied the ambitions of thirty million Frenchmen».[152]
Middle-Eastern alliances
Napoleon continued to entertain a grand scheme to establish a French presence in the Middle East in order to put pressure on Britain and Russia, and perhaps form an alliance with the Ottoman Empire.[77] In February 1806, Ottoman Emperor Selim III recognised Napoleon as Emperor. He also opted for an alliance with France, calling France «our sincere and natural ally».[153] That decision brought the Ottoman Empire into a losing war against Russia and Britain. A Franco-Persian alliance was formed between Napoleon and the Persian Empire of Fat′h-Ali Shah Qajar. It collapsed in 1807 when France and Russia formed an unexpected alliance.[77] In the end, Napoleon had made no effective alliances in the Middle East.[154]
War of the Fourth Coalition and Tilsit
After Austerlitz, Napoleon established the Confederation of the Rhine in 1806. A collection of German states intended to serve as a buffer zone between France and Central Europe, the creation of the Confederation spelled the end of the Holy Roman Empire and significantly alarmed the Prussians. The brazen reorganization of German territory by the French risked threatening Prussian influence in the region, if not eliminating it outright. War fever in Berlin rose steadily throughout the summer of 1806. At the insistence of his court, especially his wife Queen Louise, Frederick William III decided to challenge the French domination of Central Europe by going to war.[155]
The initial military manoeuvres began in September 1806. In a letter to Marshal Soult detailing the plan for the campaign, Napoleon described the essential features of Napoleonic warfare and introduced the phrase le bataillon-carré («square battalion»).[156] In the bataillon-carré system, the various corps of the Grande Armée would march uniformly together in close supporting distance.[156] If any single corps was attacked, the others could quickly spring into action and arrive to help.[157]
Napoleon invaded Prussia with 180,000 troops, rapidly marching on the right bank of the River Saale. As in previous campaigns, his fundamental objective was to destroy one opponent before reinforcements from another could tip the balance of the war. Upon learning the whereabouts of the Prussian army, the French swung westwards and crossed the Saale with overwhelming force. At the twin battles of Jena and Auerstedt, fought on 14 October, the French convincingly defeated the Prussians and inflicted heavy casualties. With several major commanders dead or incapacitated, the Prussian king proved incapable of effectively commanding the army, which began to quickly disintegrate.[157]
In a vaunted pursuit that epitomized the «peak of Napoleonic warfare», according to historian Richard Brooks,[157] the French managed to capture 140,000 soldiers, over 2,000 cannons and hundreds of ammunition wagons, all in a single month. Historian David Chandler wrote of the Prussian forces: «Never has the morale of any army been more completely shattered».[156] Despite their overwhelming defeat, the Prussians refused to negotiate with the French until the Russians had an opportunity to enter the fight.
Following his triumph, Napoleon imposed the first elements of the Continental System through the Berlin Decree issued in November 1806. The Continental System, which prohibited European nations from trading with Britain, was widely violated throughout his reign.[158][159] In the next few months, Napoleon marched against the advancing Russian armies through Poland and was involved in the bloody stalemate at the Battle of Eylau in February 1807.[160] After a period of rest and consolidation on both sides, the war restarted in June with an initial struggle at Heilsberg that proved indecisive.[161]
On 14 June Napoleon obtained an overwhelming victory over the Russians at the Battle of Friedland, wiping out the majority of the Russian army in a very bloody struggle. The scale of their defeat convinced the Russians to make peace with the French. On 19 June, Tsar Alexander sent an envoy to seek an armistice with Napoleon. The latter assured the envoy that the Vistula River represented the natural borders between French and Russian influence in Europe. On that basis, the two emperors began peace negotiations at the town of Tilsit after meeting on an iconic raft on the River Niemen. The very first thing Alexander said to Napoleon was probably well-calibrated: «I hate the English as much as you do».[161] Their meeting lasted two hours. Despite waging wars against each other the two Emperors were very much impressed and fascinated by one another. “Never,” said Alexander afterward, “did I love any man as I loved that man.”[162]
Alexander faced pressure from his brother, Duke Constantine, to make peace with Napoleon. Given the victory he had just achieved, the French emperor offered the Russians relatively lenient terms—demanding that Russia join the Continental System, withdraw its forces from Wallachia and Moldavia, and hand over the Ionian Islands to France.[163] By contrast, Napoleon dictated very harsh peace terms for Prussia, despite the ceaseless exhortations of Queen Louise. Wiping out half of Prussian territories from the map, Napoleon created a new kingdom of 2,800 square kilometres (1,100 sq mi) called Westphalia and appointed his young brother Jérôme as its monarch.[164]
Prussia’s humiliating treatment at Tilsit caused a deep and bitter antagonism that festered as the Napoleonic era progressed. Moreover, Alexander’s pretensions at friendship with Napoleon led the latter to seriously misjudge the true intentions of his Russian counterpart, who would violate numerous provisions of the treaty in the next few years. Despite these problems, the Treaties of Tilsit at last gave Napoleon a respite from war and allowed him to return to France, which he had not seen in over 300 days.[164]
Peninsular War and Erfurt
The settlements at Tilsit gave Napoleon time to organize his empire. One of his major objectives became enforcing the Continental System against the British forces. He decided to focus his attention on the Kingdom of Portugal, which consistently violated his trade prohibitions. After defeat in the War of the Oranges in 1801, Portugal adopted a double-sided policy.
Unhappy with this change of policy by the Portuguese government, Napoleon negotiated a secret treaty with Charles IV of Spain and sent an army to invade Portugal.[165] On 17 October 1807, 24,000 French troops under General Junot crossed the Pyrenees with Spanish cooperation and headed towards Portugal to enforce Napoleon’s orders.[166] This attack was the first step in what would eventually become the Peninsular War, a six-year struggle that significantly sapped French strength. Throughout the winter of 1808, French agents became increasingly involved in Spanish internal affairs, attempting to incite discord between members of the Spanish royal family. On 16 February 1808, secret French machinations finally materialized when Napoleon announced that he would intervene to mediate between the rival political factions in the country.[167]
Marshal Murat led 120,000 troops into Spain. The French arrived in Madrid on 24 March,[168] where wild riots against the occupation erupted just a few weeks later. Napoleon appointed his brother, Joseph Bonaparte, as the new King of Spain in the summer of 1808. The appointment enraged a heavily religious and conservative Spanish population. Resistance to French aggression soon spread throughout Spain. The shocking French defeats at the Battle of Bailén and the Battle of Vimiero gave hope to Napoleon’s enemies and partly persuaded the French emperor to intervene in person.[169]
Before going to Iberia, Napoleon decided to address several lingering issues with the Russians. At the Congress of Erfurt in October 1808, Napoleon hoped to keep Russia on his side during the upcoming struggle in Spain and during any potential conflict against Austria. The two sides reached an agreement, the Erfurt Convention, that called upon Britain to cease its war against France, that recognized the Russian conquest of Finland from Sweden and made it an autonomous Grand Duchy,[170] and that affirmed Russian support for France in a possible war against Austria «to the best of its ability».[171]
Napoleon then returned to France and prepared for war. The Grande Armée, under the Emperor’s personal command, rapidly crossed the Ebro River in November 1808 and inflicted a series of crushing defeats against the Spanish forces. After clearing the last Spanish force guarding the capital at Somosierra, Napoleon entered Madrid on 4 December with 80,000 troops.[172] He then unleashed his soldiers against Moore and the British forces. The British were swiftly driven to the coast, and they withdrew from Spain entirely after a last stand at the Battle of Corunna in January 1809 and the death of Moore.[173]
Napoleon accepting the surrender of Madrid, 4 December 1808
Napoleon would end up leaving Iberia in order to deal with the Austrians in Central Europe, but the Peninsular War continued on long after his absence. He never returned to Spain after the 1808 campaign. Several months after Corunna, the British sent another army to the peninsula under Arthur Wellesley, the future Duke of Wellington. The war then settled into a complex and asymmetric strategic deadlock where all sides struggled to gain the upper hand. The highlight of the conflict became the brutal guerrilla warfare that engulfed much of the Spanish countryside. Both sides committed the worst atrocities of the Napoleonic Wars during this phase of the conflict.[174]
The vicious guerrilla fighting in Spain, largely absent from the French campaigns in Central Europe, severely disrupted the French lines of supply and communication. Although France maintained roughly 300,000 troops in Iberia during the Peninsular War, the vast majority were tied down to garrison duty and to intelligence operations.[174] The French were never able to concentrate all of their forces effectively, prolonging the war until events elsewhere in Europe finally turned the tide in favour of the Allies. After the invasion of Russia in 1812, the number of French troops in Spain vastly declined as Napoleon needed reinforcements to conserve his strategic position in Europe. By 1814 the Allies had pushed the French out of the peninsula.
The impact of the Napoleonic invasion of Spain and ousting of the Spanish Bourbon monarchy in favour of his brother Joseph had an enormous impact on the Spanish empire. In Spanish America many local elites formed juntas and set up mechanisms to rule in the name of Ferdinand VII of Spain, whom they considered the legitimate Spanish monarch. The outbreak of the Spanish American wars of independence in most of the empire was a result of Napoleon’s destabilizing actions in Spain and led to the rise of strongmen in the wake of these wars.[175]
War of the Fifth Coalition and Marie Louise
After four years on the sidelines, Austria sought another war with France to avenge its recent defeats. Austria could not count on Russian support because the latter was at war with Britain, Sweden, and the Ottoman Empire in 1809. Frederick William of Prussia initially promised to help the Austrians but reneged before conflict began.[176] A report from the Austrian finance minister suggested that the treasury would run out of money by the middle of 1809 if the large army that the Austrians had formed since the Third Coalition remained mobilized.[176] Although Archduke Charles warned that the Austrians were not ready for another showdown with Napoleon, a stance that landed him in the so-called «peace party», he did not want to see the army demobilized either.[176] On 8 February 1809, the advocates for war finally succeeded when the Imperial Government secretly decided on another confrontation against the French.[177]
In the early morning of 10 April, leading elements of the Austrian army crossed the Inn River and invaded Bavaria. The early Austrian attack surprised the French; Napoleon himself was still in Paris when he heard about the invasion. He arrived at Donauwörth on the 17th to find the Grande Armée in a dangerous position, with its two wings separated by 120 km (75 mi) and joined by a thin cordon of Bavarian troops. Charles pressed the left wing of the French army and hurled his men towards the III Corps of Marshal Davout.[178]
In response, Napoleon came up with a plan to cut off the Austrians in the celebrated Landshut Maneuver.[179] He realigned the axis of his army and marched his soldiers towards the town of Eckmühl. The French scored a convincing win in the resulting Battle of Eckmühl, forcing Charles to withdraw his forces over the Danube and into Bohemia. On 13 May, Vienna fell for the second time in four years, although the war continued since most of the Austrian army had survived the initial engagements in Southern Germany.
On 21 May, the French made their first major effort to cross the Danube, precipitating the Battle of Aspern-Essling. The battle was characterized by a vicious back-and-forth struggle for the two villages of Aspern and Essling, the focal points of the French bridgehead. A sustained Austrian artillery bombardment eventually convinced Napoleon to withdraw his forces back onto Lobau Island. Both sides inflicted about 23,000 casualties on each other.[180] It was the first defeat Napoleon suffered in a major set-piece battle, and it caused excitement throughout many parts of Europe because it proved that he could be beaten on the battlefield.[181]
After the setback at Aspern-Essling, Napoleon took more than six weeks in planning and preparing for contingencies before he made another attempt at crossing the Danube.[182] From 30 June to the early days of July, the French recrossed the Danube in strength, with more than 180,000 troops marching across the Marchfeld towards the Austrians.[182] Charles received the French with 150,000 of his own men.[183] In the ensuing Battle of Wagram, which also lasted two days, Napoleon commanded his forces in what was the largest battle of his career up until then. Napoleon finished off the battle with a concentrated central thrust that punctured a hole in the Austrian army and forced Charles to retreat. Austrian losses were very heavy, reaching well over 40,000 casualties.[184] The French were too exhausted to pursue the Austrians immediately, but Napoleon eventually caught up with Charles at Znaim and the latter signed an armistice on 12 July.
In the Kingdom of Holland, the British launched the Walcheren Campaign to open up a second front in the war and to relieve the pressure on the Austrians. The British army only landed at Walcheren on 30 July, by which point the Austrians had already been defeated. The Walcheren Campaign was characterized by little fighting but heavy casualties thanks to the popularly dubbed «Walcheren Fever». Over 4,000 British troops were lost in a bungled campaign, and the rest withdrew in December 1809.[185] The main strategic result from the campaign became the delayed political settlement between the French and the Austrians. Emperor Francis waited to see how the British performed in their theatre before entering into negotiations with Napoleon. Once it became apparent the British were going nowhere, the Austrians agreed to peace talks.[citation needed]
The resulting Treaty of Schönbrunn in October 1809 was the harshest that France had imposed on Austria in recent memory. Metternich and Archduke Charles had the preservation of the Habsburg Empire as their fundamental goal, and to this end, they succeeded by making Napoleon seek more modest goals in return for promises of friendship between the two powers.[186] While most of the hereditary lands remained a part of the Habsburg realm, France received Carinthia, Carniola, and the Adriatic ports, while Galicia was given to the Poles and the Salzburg area of the Tyrol went to the Bavarians.[186] Austria lost over three million subjects, about one-fifth of her total population, as a result of these territorial changes.[187]
Napoleon turned his focus to domestic affairs after the war. Empress Joséphine had still not given birth to a child from Napoleon, who became worried about the future of his empire following his death. Desperate for a legitimate heir, Napoleon divorced Joséphine on 10 January 1810 and started looking for a new wife. Hoping to cement the recent alliance with Austria through a family connection, Napoleon married the 18-year-old Archduchess Marie Louise, daughter of Emperor Francis II. On 20 March 1811, Marie Louise gave birth to a baby boy, whom Napoleon made heir apparent and bestowed the title of King of Rome. His son never actually ruled the empire, but given his brief titular rule and cousin Louis-Napoléon’s subsequent naming himself Napoléon III, historians often refer to him as Napoleon II.[188]
Invasion of Russia
In 1808, Napoleon and Tsar Alexander met at the Congress of Erfurt to preserve the Russo-French alliance. The leaders had a friendly personal relationship after their first meeting at Tilsit in 1807.[189] By 1811, however, tensions had increased, a strain on the relationship became the regular violations of the Continental System by the Russians as their economy was failing, which led Napoleon to threaten Alexander with serious consequences if he formed an alliance with Britain.[190]
By 1812, advisers to Alexander suggested the possibility of an invasion of the French Empire and the recapture of Poland. On receipt of intelligence reports on Russia’s war preparations, Napoleon expanded his Grande Armée to more than 450,000 men.[191] He ignored repeated advice against an invasion of the Russian heartland and prepared for an offensive campaign; on 24 June 1812 the invasion commenced.[192]
In an attempt to gain increased support from Polish nationalists and patriots, Napoleon termed the war the Second Polish War—the First Polish War had been the Bar Confederation uprising by Polish nobles against Russia in 1768. Polish patriots wanted the Russian part of Poland to be joined with the Duchy of Warsaw and an independent Poland created. This was rejected by Napoleon, who stated he had promised his ally Austria this would not happen. Napoleon refused to manumit the Russian serfs because of concerns this might provoke a reaction in his army’s rear. The serfs later committed atrocities against French soldiers during France’s retreat.[193]
The Russians avoided Napoleon’s objective of a decisive engagement and instead retreated deeper into Russia. A brief attempt at resistance was made at Smolensk in August; the Russians were defeated in a series of battles, and Napoleon resumed his advance. The Russians again avoided battle, although in a few cases this was only achieved because Napoleon uncharacteristically hesitated to attack when the opportunity arose. Owing to the Russian army’s scorched earth tactics, the French found it increasingly difficult to forage food for themselves and their horses.[194]
The Russians eventually offered battle outside Moscow on 7 September: the Battle of Borodino resulted in approximately 44,000 Russian and 35,000 French dead, wounded or captured, and may have been the bloodiest day of battle in history up to that point in time.[195] Although the French had won, the Russian army had accepted, and withstood, the major battle Napoleon had hoped would be decisive. Napoleon’s own account was: «The most terrible of all my battles was the one before Moscow. The French showed themselves to be worthy of victory, but the Russians showed themselves worthy of being invincible».[196]
The Russian army withdrew and retreated past Moscow. Napoleon entered the city, assuming its fall would end the war and Alexander would negotiate peace. Moscow was burned, rather than surrendered, on the order of Moscow’s governor Feodor Rostopchin. After five weeks, Napoleon and his army left. In early November Napoleon became concerned about the loss of control back in France after the Malet coup of 1812. His army walked through snow up to their knees, and nearly 10,000 men and horses froze to death on the night of 8/9 November alone. After the Battle of Berezina Napoleon managed to escape but had to abandon much of the remaining artillery and baggage train. On 5 December, shortly before arriving in Vilnius, Napoleon left the army in a sledge.[197]
The French suffered in the course of a ruinous retreat, including from the harshness of the Russian Winter. The Armée had begun as over 400,000 frontline troops, with fewer than 40,000 crossing the Berezina River in November 1812.[198] The Russians had lost 150,000 soldiers in battle and hundreds of thousands of civilians.[199]
War of the Sixth Coalition
There was a lull in fighting over the winter of 1812–13 while both the Russians and the French rebuilt their forces; Napoleon was able to field 350,000 troops.[200] Heartened by France’s loss in Russia, Prussia joined with Austria, Sweden, Russia, Great Britain, Spain, and Portugal in a new coalition. Napoleon assumed command in Germany and inflicted a series of defeats on the Coalition culminating in the Battle of Dresden in August 1813.[201]
Despite these successes, the numbers continued to mount against Napoleon, and the French army was pinned down by a force twice its size and lost at the Battle of Leipzig. This was by far the largest battle of the Napoleonic Wars and cost more than 90,000 casualties in total.[202]
The Allies offered peace terms in the Frankfurt proposals in November 1813. Napoleon would remain as Emperor of the French, but it would be reduced to its «natural frontiers». That meant that France could retain control of Belgium, Savoy and the Rhineland (the west bank of the Rhine River), while giving up control of all the rest, including all of Spain and the Netherlands, and most of Italy and Germany. Metternich told Napoleon these were the best terms the Allies were likely to offer; after further victories, the terms would be harsher and harsher. Metternich’s motivation was to maintain France as a balance against Russian threats while ending the highly destabilizing series of wars.[203]
Napoleon, expecting to win the war, delayed too long and lost this opportunity; by December the Allies had withdrawn the offer. When his back was to the wall in 1814 he tried to reopen peace negotiations on the basis of accepting the Frankfurt proposals. The Allies now had new, harsher terms that included the retreat of France to its 1791 boundaries, which meant the loss of Belgium, but Napoleon would remain Emperor. However, he rejected the term. The British wanted Napoleon permanently removed, and they prevailed, though Napoleon adamantly refused.[203][204]
Napoleon after his abdication in Fontainebleau, 4 April 1814, by Paul Delaroche
Napoleon withdrew into France, his army reduced to 70,000 soldiers and little cavalry; he faced more than three times as many Allied troops.[205] Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s older brother, abdicated as king of Spain on 13 December 1813 and assumed the title of lieutenant general to save the collapsing empire. The French were surrounded: British armies pressed from the south, and other Coalition forces positioned to attack from the German states. By the middle of January 1814, the Coalition had already entered France’s borders and launched a two-pronged attack on Paris, with Prussia entering from the north, and Austria from the East, marching out of the capitulated Swiss confederation. The French Empire, however, would not go down so easily. Napoleon launched a series of victories in the Six Days’ Campaign. While they repulsed the coalition forces and delayed the capture of Paris by at least a full month, these were not significant enough to turn the tide. The coalitionaries camped on the outskirts of the capital on 29 March. A day later, they advanced onto the demoralised soldiers protecting the city. Joseph Bonaparte led a final battle at the gates of Paris. They were greatly outnumbered, as 30,000 French soldiers were pitted against a combined coalition force that was 5 times greater than theirs. They were defeated, and Joseph retreated out of the city. The leaders of Paris surrendered to the Coalition on the last day of March 1814.[206] On 1 April, Alexander addressed the Sénat conservateur. Long docile to Napoleon, under Talleyrand’s prodding it had turned against him. Alexander told the Sénat that the Allies were fighting against Napoleon, not France, and they were prepared to offer honourable peace terms if Napoleon were removed from power. The next day, the Sénat passed the Acte de déchéance de l’Empereur («Emperor’s Demise Act»), which declared Napoleon deposed.
Napoleon had advanced as far as Fontainebleau when he learned that Paris had fallen. When Napoleon proposed the army march on the capital, his senior officers and marshals mutinied.[207] On 4 April, led by Ney, the senior officers confronted Napoleon. When Napoleon asserted the army would follow him, Ney replied the army would follow its generals. While the ordinary soldiers and regimental officers wanted to fight on, the senior commanders were unwilling to continue. Without any senior officers or marshals, any prospective invasion of Paris would have been impossible. Bowing to the inevitable, on 4 April Napoleon abdicated in favour of his son, with Marie Louise as regent. However, the Allies refused to accept this under prodding from Alexander, who feared that Napoleon might find an excuse to retake the throne.[208][209] Napoleon was then forced to announce his unconditional abdication only two days later.[209]
In his farewell address to the soldiers of Old Guard in 20 April, Napoleon said:
«Soldiers of my Old Guard, I have come to bid you farewell. For twenty years you have accompanied me faithfully on the paths of honor and glory. …With men like you, our cause was [not] lost, but the war would have dragged on interminably, and it would have been a civil war. … So I am sacrificing our interests to those of our country. …Do not lament my fate; if I have agreed to live on, it is to serve our glory. I wish to write the history of the great deeds we have done together. Farewell, my children!»[210]
Exile to Elba
Napoleon leaving Elba on 26 February 1815, by Joseph Beaume (1836)
The Allied Powers having declared that Emperor Napoleon was the sole obstacle to the restoration of peace in Europe, Emperor Napoleon, faithful to his oath, declares that he renounces, for himself and his heirs, the thrones of France and Italy, and that there is no personal sacrifice, even that of his life, which he is not ready to make in the interests of France.
Done in the palace of Fontainebleau, 11 April 1814.— Act of abdication of Napoleon[211]
In the Treaty of Fontainebleau, the Allies exiled Napoleon to Elba, an island of 12,000 inhabitants in the Mediterranean, 10 km (6 mi) off the Tuscan coast. They gave him sovereignty over the island and allowed him to retain the title of Emperor. Napoleon attempted suicide with a pill he had carried after nearly being captured by the Russians during the retreat from Moscow. Its potency had weakened with age, however, and he survived to be exiled, while his wife and son took refuge in Austria.[212]
He was conveyed to the island on HMS Undaunted by Captain Thomas Ussher, and he arrived at Portoferraio on 30 May 1814. In the first few months on Elba he created a small navy and army, developed the iron mines, oversaw the construction of new roads, issued decrees on modern agricultural methods, and overhauled the island’s legal and educational system.[213][214]
A few months into his exile, Napoleon learned that his ex-wife Josephine had died in France. He was devastated by the news, locking himself in his room and refusing to leave for two days.[215]
Hundred Days
Separated from his wife and son, who had returned to Austria, cut off from the allowance guaranteed to him by the Treaty of Fontainebleau, and aware of rumours he was about to be banished to a remote island in the Atlantic Ocean,[216] Napoleon escaped from Elba in the brig Inconstant on 26 February 1815 with 700 men.[216] Two days later, he landed on the French mainland at Golfe-Juan and started heading north.[216]
The 5th Regiment was sent to intercept him and made contact just south of Grenoble on 7 March 1815. Napoleon approached the regiment alone, dismounted his horse and, when he was within gunshot range, shouted to the soldiers, «Here I am. Kill your Emperor, if you wish.»[217] The soldiers quickly responded with, «Vive L’Empereur!» Ney, who had boasted to the restored Bourbon king, Louis XVIII, that he would bring Napoleon to Paris in an iron cage, affectionately kissed his former emperor and forgot his oath of allegiance to the Bourbon monarch. The two then marched together toward Paris with a growing army. The unpopular Louis XVIII fled to Belgium after realizing that he had little political support. On 13 March, the powers at the Congress of Vienna declared Napoleon an outlaw. Four days later, Great Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia each pledged to put 150,000 men into the field to end his rule.[218]
Napoleon arrived in Paris on 20 March and governed for a period now called the Hundred Days. By the start of June, the armed forces available to him had reached 200,000, and he decided to go on the offensive to attempt to drive a wedge between the oncoming British and Prussian armies. The French Army of the North crossed the frontier into the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, in modern-day Belgium.[219]
Napoleon’s forces fought two Coalition armies, commanded by the British Duke of Wellington and the Prussian Prince Blücher, at the Battle of Waterloo on 18 June 1815. Wellington’s army withstood repeated attacks by the French and drove them from the field while the Prussians arrived in force and broke through Napoleon’s right flank.
Napoleon returned to Paris and found that both the legislature and the people had turned against him. Realizing that his position was untenable, he abdicated on 22 June in favour of his son. He left Paris three days later and settled at Josephine’s former palace in Malmaison (on the western bank of the Seine about 17 kilometres (11 mi) west of Paris). Even as Napoleon travelled to Paris, the Coalition forces swept through France (arriving in the vicinity of Paris on 29 June), with the stated intent of restoring Louis XVIII to the French throne.
When Napoleon heard that Prussian troops had orders to capture him dead or alive, he fled to Rochefort, considering an escape to the United States. British ships were blocking every port. Napoleon surrendered to Captain Frederick Maitland on HMS Bellerophon on 15 July 1815.[220]
Exile on Saint Helena
Napoleon on Saint Helena, watercolor by Franz Josef Sandmann, c. 1820
The British kept Napoleon on the island of Saint Helena in the Atlantic Ocean, 1,870 km (1,162 mi) from the west coast of Africa. They also took the precaution of sending a small garrison of soldiers to both Saint Helena and the uninhabited Ascension Island, which lay between St. Helena and Europe, to prevent any escape from the island.[221]
Napoleon was moved to Longwood House on Saint Helena in December 1815; it had fallen into disrepair, and the location was damp, windswept and unhealthy.[222][223] The Times published articles insinuating the British government was trying to hasten his death. Napoleon often complained of the living conditions of Longwood House in letters to the island’s governor and his custodian, Hudson Lowe,[224] while his attendants complained of «colds, catarrhs, damp floors and poor provisions.»[225] Modern scientists have speculated that his later illness may have arisen from arsenic poisoning caused by copper arsenite in the wallpaper at Longwood House.[226]
With a small cadre of followers, Napoleon dictated his memoirs and grumbled about the living conditions. Lowe cut Napoleon’s expenditure, ruled that no gifts were allowed if they mentioned his imperial status, and made his supporters sign a guarantee they would stay with the prisoner indefinitely.[227] When he held a dinner party, men were expected to wear military dress and «women [appeared] in evening gowns and gems. It was an explicit denial of the circumstances of his captivity».[228]
While in exile, Napoleon wrote a book about Julius Caesar, one of his great heroes.[229] He also studied English under the tutelage of Count Emmanuel de Las Cases with the main aim of being able to read English newspapers and books, as access to French newspapers and books was heavily restricted to him on Saint Helena.[230] Napoleon also devoted himself to compiling a book «Mémorial de Ste-Hélène«, an account which reflected his self-depiction as a liberal, visionary ruler for European unification, deposed by reactionary elements of the Ancien Régime.[231]
Another pastime of Napoleon’s while in exile was playing card games.[232][233] The number of patiences named in his honour seems to suggest that he was an avid player of the solitary game. Napoleon at St Helena is described as being a favourite of his,[234] while Napoleon’s Favourite (or St. Helena) is clearly a contender. Other games with a Napoleonic theme include Napoleon’s Flank, Napoleon’s Shoulder, Napoleon’s Square and Little Napoleon Patience. However, Arnold argues that, while Napoleon played cards in exile, the notion that he played numerous patience games is «based on a misunderstanding».[232]
There were rumours of plots and even of his escape from Saint Helena, but in reality, no serious attempts were ever made.[235] For English poet Lord Byron, Napoleon was the epitome of the Romantic hero, the persecuted, lonely, and flawed genius.[236]
Death
Napoleon’s personal physician, Barry O’Meara, warned London that his declining state of health was mainly caused by the harsh treatment. During the last few years of his life, Napoleon confined himself for months on end in his damp, mold-infested and wretched habitation of Longwood. Years of isolation and loneliness took its toll on Napoleon’s mental health, having his court continually reduced, including the arrest of Count Emmanuel de Las Cases, conditions which Lord Holland used to bring about a debate regarding the treatment of Napoleon in captivity.[237]
In February 1821, Napoleon’s health began to deteriorate rapidly, and he reconciled with the Catholic Church. By March, he had become confined to bed. Napoleon died on 5 May 1821 at Longwood House at age 51, after making his last confession, Extreme Unction and Viaticum in the presence of Father Ange Vignali from his deathbed. His last words were, France, l’armée, tête d’armée, Joséphine («France, the army, head of the army, Joséphine»).[238][239][231]
Shortly after his death, an autopsy was conducted and Francesco Antommarchi, the doctor conducting the autopsy, cut off Napoleon’s penis.[29][page needed][240] Napoleon’s original death mask was created around 6 May, although it is not clear which doctor created it.[i][242] Napoleon’s heart and intestines were removed and contained separately in two sealed vessels, which were placed inside his coffin at his feet. In his will, he had asked to be buried on the banks of the Seine, but the British governor said he should be buried on Saint Helena, in the Valley of the Willows.[238]
In 1840, Louis Philippe I obtained permission from the British government to return Napoleon’s remains to France. His casket was opened to confirm that it still contained the former emperor. Despite being dead for nearly two decades, Napoleon had been very well preserved and not decomposed at all. On 15 December 1840, a state funeral was held. The horse-drawn hearse proceeded from the Arc de Triomphe down the Champs-Élysées, across the Place de la Concorde to the Esplanade des Invalides and then to the cupola in St Jérôme’s Chapel, where it remained until the tomb designed by Louis Visconti was completed.
In 1861, Napoleon’s remains were entombed in a sarcophagus of red quartzite from Russia (often mistaken for porphyry) in the crypt under the dome at Les Invalides.[243]
Cause of death
Situation of Napoleon’s body when his coffin was reopened on St Helena, by Jules Rigo, 1840
The cause of Napoleon’s death has been debated. His physician, François Carlo Antommarchi, led the autopsy, which found the cause of death to be stomach cancer. Antommarchi did not sign the official report.[244] Napoleon’s father had died of stomach cancer, although this was apparently unknown at the time of the autopsy.[245] Antommarchi found evidence of a stomach ulcer; this was the most convenient explanation for the British, who wanted to avoid criticism over their care of Napoleon.[238]
In 1955, the diaries of Napoleon’s valet, Louis Marchand, were published. His description of Napoleon in the months before his death led Sten Forshufvud in a 1961 paper in Nature to put forward other causes for his death, including deliberate arsenic poisoning.[246] Arsenic was used as a poison during the era because it was undetectable when administered over a long period. Furthermore, in a 1978 book with Ben Weider, Forshufvud noted that Napoleon’s body was found to be well preserved when moved in 1840. Arsenic is a strong preservative, and therefore this supported the poisoning hypothesis. Forshufvud and Weider observed that Napoleon had attempted to quench abnormal thirst by drinking large amounts of orgeat syrup that contained cyanide compounds in the almonds used for flavouring.[246] They maintained that the potassium tartrate used in his treatment prevented his stomach from expelling these compounds and that his thirst was a symptom of the poison. Their hypothesis was that the calomel given to Napoleon became an overdose, which killed him and left extensive tissue damage behind.[246] According to a 2007 article, the type of arsenic found in Napoleon’s hair shafts was mineral, the most toxic, and according to toxicologist Patrick Kintz, this supported the conclusion that he was murdered.[247]
There have been modern studies that have supported the original autopsy finding.[247] In a 2008 study, researchers analysed samples of Napoleon’s hair from throughout his life, as well as samples from his family and other contemporaries. All samples had high levels of arsenic, approximately 100 times higher than the current average. According to these researchers, Napoleon’s body was already heavily contaminated with arsenic as a boy, and the high arsenic concentration in his hair was not caused by intentional poisoning; people were constantly exposed to arsenic from glues and dyes throughout their lives.[j] Studies published in 2007 and 2008 dismissed evidence of arsenic poisoning, suggesting peptic ulcer and gastric cancer as the cause of death.[249]
Religion
Napoleon was baptised in Ajaccio on 21 July 1771. He was raised as a Catholic but never developed much faith,[250] though he recalled the day of his First Communion in the Catholic Church to be the happiest day of his life.[251][252] As an adult, Napoleon was a deist, believing in an absent and distant God. However, he had a keen appreciation of the power of organized religion in social and political affairs, and he paid a great deal of attention to bending it to his purposes. He noted the influence of Catholicism’s rituals and splendors.[250]
Napoleon had a civil marriage with Joséphine de Beauharnais, without religious ceremony. Napoleon was crowned Emperor on 2 December 1804 at Notre-Dame de Paris in a ceremony presided over by Pope Pius VII. On the eve of the coronation ceremony, and at the insistence of Pope Pius VII, a private religious wedding ceremony of Napoleon and Joséphine was celebrated. Cardinal Fesch performed the wedding.[253] This marriage was annulled by tribunals under Napoleon’s control in January 1810. On 1 April 1810, Napoleon married the Austrian princess Marie Louise in a Catholic ceremony. Napoleon was excommunicated by the Pope through the bull Quum memoranda in 1809, but later reconciled with the Catholic Church before his death in 1821.[254] While in exile in Saint Helena he is recorded to have said «I know men; and I tell you that Jesus Christ is not a man.»[255][256][257]
He also defended Muhammad («a great man») against Voltaire’s Mahomet.[258]
Concordat
Leaders of the Catholic Church taking the civil oath required by the Concordat
Seeking national reconciliation between revolutionaries and Catholics, Napoleon and Pope Pius VII signed the Concordat of 1801 on 15 July 1801. It solidified the Roman Catholic Church as the majority church of France and brought back most of its civil status. The hostility of devout Catholics against the state had now largely been resolved. The Concordat did not restore the vast church lands and endowments that had been seized during the revolution and sold off. As a part of the Concordat, Napoleon presented another set of laws called the Organic Articles.[259][260]
While the Concordat restored much power to the papacy, the balance of church–state relations had tilted firmly in Napoleon’s favour. He selected the bishops and supervised church finances. Napoleon and the Pope both found the Concordat useful. Similar arrangements were made with the Church in territories controlled by Napoleon, especially Italy and Germany.[261] Now, Napoleon could win favour with the Catholics while also controlling Rome in a political sense. Napoleon said in April 1801, «Skillful conquerors have not got entangled with priests. They can both contain them and use them». French children were issued a catechism that taught them to love and respect Napoleon.[262]
Arrest of Pope Pius VII
In 1809, under Napoleon’s orders, Pope Pius VII was placed under arrest in Italy, and in 1812 the prisoner Pontiff was transferred to France, being held in the Palace of Fontainebleau.[263] Because the arrest was made in a clandestine manner, some sources[264][263] describe it as a kidnapping. In January 1813, Napoleon personally forced the Pope to sign a humiliating «Concordat of Fontainebleau»[265] which was later repudiated by the Pontiff.[266] The Pope was not released until 1814, when the Coalition invaded France.
Religious emancipation
Napoleon emancipated Jews, as well as Protestants in Catholic countries and Catholics in Protestant countries, from laws which restricted them to ghettos, and he expanded their rights to property, worship, and careers. Despite the antisemitic reaction to Napoleon’s policies from foreign governments and within France, he believed emancipation would benefit France by attracting Jews to the country given the restrictions they faced elsewhere.[267]
In 1806 an assembly of Jewish notables was gathered by Napoleon to discuss 12 questions broadly dealing with the relations between Jews and Christians, as well as other issues dealing with the Jewish ability to integrate into French society. Later, after the questions were answered in a satisfactory way according to the Emperor, a «great Sanhedrin» was brought together to transform the answers into decisions that would form the basis of the future status of the Jews in France and the rest of the empire Napoleon was building.[268]
He stated, «I will never accept any proposals that will obligate the Jewish people to leave France, because to me the Jews are the same as any other citizen in our country. It takes weakness to chase them out of the country, but it takes strength to assimilate them».[269] He was seen as so favourable to the Jews that the Russian Orthodox Church formally condemned him as «Antichrist and the Enemy of God».[270]
One year after the final meeting of the Sanhedrin, on 17 March 1808, Napoleon placed the Jews on probation. Several new laws restricting the citizenship the Jews had been offered 17 years previously were instituted at that time. However, despite pressure from leaders of a number of Christian communities to refrain from granting Jews emancipation, within one year of the issue of the new restrictions, they were once again lifted in response to the appeal of Jews from all over France.[268]
Freemasonry
It is not known for certain if Napoleon was initiated into Freemasonry. As Emperor, he appointed his brothers to Masonic offices under his jurisdiction: Louis was given the title of Deputy Grand Master in 1805; Jerome the title of Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Westphalia; Joseph was appointed Grand Master of the Grand Orient de France; and finally Lucien was a member of the Grand Orient of France.[271]
Personality
Napoleon visiting the Palais Royal for the opening of the 8th session of the Tribunat in 1807, by Merry-Joseph Blondel
Historians emphasize the strength of the ambition that took Napoleon from an obscure village to rule over most of Europe.[272] In-depth academic studies about his early life conclude that up until age 2, he had a «gentle disposition».[30] His older brother, Joseph, frequently received their mother’s attention which made Napoleon more assertive and approval-driven. During his early schooling years, he would be harshly bullied by classmates for his Corsican identity and limited command of the French language. To withstand the stress he became domineering, eventually developing an inferiority complex.[30]
George F. E. Rudé stresses his «rare combination of will, intellect and physical vigour».[273] In one-on-one situations he typically had a hypnotic effect on people, seemingly bending the strongest leaders to his will.[274] He understood military technology, but was not an innovator in that regard.[275] He was an innovator in using the financial, bureaucratic, and diplomatic resources of France. He could rapidly dictate a series of complex commands to his subordinates, keeping in mind where major units were expected to be at each future point, and like a chess master, «seeing» the best plays moves ahead.[276] This intellectual vigour was accompanied by a mixture of «remarkable charisma and willpower» and «a furious temper» exhibited during failure of his plans; which commanded respect as well as dread from his adjutants.[277]
Napoleon maintained strict, efficient work habits, prioritizing what needed to be done. He cheated at cards, but repaid the losses; he had to win at everything he attempted.[278] He kept relays of staff and secretaries at work. Unlike many generals, Napoleon did not examine history to ask what Hannibal or Alexander or anyone else did in a similar situation. Critics said he won many battles simply because of luck; Napoleon responded, «Give me lucky generals», arguing that «luck» comes to leaders who recognize opportunity, and seize it.[279] Dwyer states that Napoleon’s victories at Austerlitz and Jena in 1805–06 heightened his sense of self-grandiosity, leaving him even more certain of his destiny and invincibility.[280] «I am of the race that founds empires» he once boasted, deeming himself an heir to the Ancient Romans.[281]
In terms of influence on events, it was more than Napoleon’s personality that took effect. He reorganized France itself to supply the men and money needed for wars.[282] He inspired his men—the Duke of Wellington said his presence on the battlefield was worth 40,000 soldiers, for he inspired confidence from privates to field marshals.[283] The force of his personality neutralized material difficulties as his soldiers fought with the confidence that with Napoleon in charge they would surely win.[284]
Image
The military historian Martin van Creveld has described him as «the most competent human being who ever lived».[285] Since his death, many towns, streets, ships, and even cartoon characters have been named after him. He has been portrayed in hundreds of films and discussed in hundreds of thousands of books and articles.[286][287][288] The German legal scholar Carl Theoder Welcker described Napoleon as «the greatest master of Machiavellism».[289]
When his contemporaries met him in person, many were surprised by his apparently unremarkable physical appearance in contrast to his significant deeds and reputation, especially in his youth, when he was consistently described as small and thin. English painter Joseph Farington, who observed Napoleon personally in 1802, commented that «Samuel Rogers stood a little way from me and… seemed to be disappointed in the look of [Napoleon’s] countenance [«face»] and said it was that of a little Italian.» Farington said Napoleon’s eyes were «lighter, and more of a grey, than I should have expected from his complexion», that «his person is below middle size», and that «his general aspect was milder than I had before thought it.»[290]
A personal friend of Napoleon’s said that when he first met him in Brienne-le-Château as a young man, Napoleon was only notable «for the dark color of his complexion, for his piercing and scrutinising glance, and for the style of his conversation»; he also said that Napoleon was personally a serious and somber man: «his conversation bore the appearance of ill-humor, and he was certainly not very amiable.»[291] Johann Ludwig Wurstemberger, who accompanied Napoleon from Camp Fornio in 1797 and on the Swiss campaign of 1798, noted that «Bonaparte was rather slight and emaciated-looking; his face, too, was very thin, with a dark complexion… his black, unpowdered hair hung down evenly over both shoulders», but that, despite his slight and unkempt appearance, «[h]is looks and expression were earnest and powerful.»[292]
Denis Davydov met him personally and considered him remarkably average in appearance:
His face was slightly swarthy, with regular features. His nose was not very large, but straight, with a slight, hardly noticeable bend. The hair on his head was dark reddish-blond; his eyebrows and eyelashes were much darker than the colour of his hair, and his blue eyes, set off by the almost black lashes, gave him a most pleasing expression … The man I saw was of short stature, just over five feet tall, rather heavy although he was only 37 years old.[293]
During the Napoleonic Wars, he was taken seriously by the British press as a dangerous tyrant, poised to invade. Despite or due to his average size, Napoleon was mocked in British newspapers as a short tempered small man and he was nicknamed «Little Boney in a strong fit».[294] A nursery rhyme warned children that Bonaparte ravenously ate naughty people; the «bogeyman».[295] The British propaganda about his supposedly small size was so successful that many people today «know» very little besides this untruth about him.[296] At 1.57 metres (5 ft 2 in), he had the height of an average French male but was short for an aristocrat or officer (partly why he was assigned to the artillery, since at the time the infantry and cavalry required more commanding figures).[297]
Some historians believe his size at death was incorrectly recorded due to use of an obsolete old French yardstick (a French foot equals 33 cm, while an English foot equals 30.47 cm).[297][298] But Napoleon was a champion of the metric system and had no use for the old yardsticks that had been out of use since 1793 in France. It is likely that he was 1.57 m (5 ft 2 in), the height measured on St. Helena (a British island), since he would have most likely been measured with an English yardstick rather than a yardstick of the French Old Regime.[297] Napoleon surrounded himself with tall bodyguards and was affectionately nicknamed le petit caporal (the little corporal), reflecting his reported camaraderie with his soldiers rather than his height.
When he became First Consul and later Emperor, Napoleon eschewed his general’s uniform and habitually wore the green colonel uniform (non-Hussar) of a colonel of the Chasseur à Cheval of the Imperial Guard, the regiment that served as his personal escort many times, with a large bicorne. He also habitually wore (usually on Sundays) the blue uniform of a colonel of the Imperial Guard Foot Grenadiers (blue with white facings and red cuffs). He also wore his Légion d’honneur star, medal and ribbon, and the Order of the Iron Crown decorations, white French-style culottes and white stockings. This was in contrast to the complex uniforms with many decorations of his marshals and those around him.
In his later years he gained quite a bit of weight and had a complexion considered pale or sallow, something contemporaries took note of. Novelist Paul de Kock, who saw him in 1811 on the balcony of the Tuileries, called Napoleon «yellow, obese, and bloated».[299] A British captain who met him in 1815 stated «I felt very much disappointed, as I believe everyone else did, in his appearance … He is fat, rather what we call pot-bellied, and although his leg is well shaped, it is rather clumsy … He is very sallow, with light grey eyes, and rather thin, greasy-looking brown hair, and altogether a very nasty, priestlike-looking fellow.»[300]
The stock character of Napoleon is a comically short «petty tyrant» and this has become a cliché in popular culture. He is often portrayed wearing a large bicorne hat—sideways—with a hand-in-waistcoat gesture—a reference to the painting produced in 1812 by Jacques-Louis David.[301] In 1908 Alfred Adler, a psychologist, cited Napoleon to describe an inferiority complex in which short people adopt an over-aggressive behaviour to compensate for lack of height; this inspired the term Napoleon complex.[302]
Reforms
Napoleon instituted various reforms, such as higher education, a tax code, road and sewer systems, and established the Banque de France, the first central bank in French history. He negotiated the Concordat of 1801 with the Catholic Church, which sought to reconcile the mostly Catholic population to his regime. It was presented alongside the Organic Articles, which regulated public worship in France. He dissolved the Holy Roman Empire prior to German Unification later in the 19th century. The sale of the Louisiana Territory to the United States doubled the size of the United States.[303]
In May 1802, he instituted the Legion of Honour, a substitute for the old royalist decorations and orders of chivalry, to encourage civilian and military achievements; the order is still the highest decoration in France.[304]
Napoleonic Code
First page of the 1804 original edition of the Code Civil
Napoleon’s set of civil laws, the Code Civil—now often known as the Napoleonic Code—was prepared by committees of legal experts under the supervision of Jean Jacques Régis de Cambacérès, the Second Consul. Napoleon participated actively in the sessions of the Council of State that revised the drafts. The development of the code was a fundamental change in the nature of the civil law legal system with its stress on clearly written and accessible law. Other codes («Les cinq codes») were commissioned by Napoleon to codify criminal and commerce law; a Code of Criminal Instruction was published, which enacted rules of due process.[305]
The Napoleonic code was adopted throughout much of Continental Europe, though only in the lands he conquered, and remained in force after Napoleon’s defeat. Napoleon said: «My true glory is not to have won forty battles … Waterloo will erase the memory of so many victories. … But … what will live forever, is my Civil Code».[306] The Code influences a quarter of the world’s jurisdictions such as those in Continental Europe, the Americas, and Africa.[307]
Dieter Langewiesche described the code as a «revolutionary project» that spurred the development of bourgeois society in Germany by the extension of the right to own property and an acceleration towards the end of feudalism. Napoleon reorganized what had been the Holy Roman Empire, made up of about three hundred Kleinstaaterei, into a more streamlined forty-state Confederation of the Rhine; this helped promote the German Confederation and the unification of Germany in 1871.[308]
The movement toward Italian unification was similarly precipitated by Napoleonic rule.[309] These changes contributed to the development of nationalism and the nation state.[310]
Napoleon directly overthrew remnants of feudalism in much of western Continental Europe. He liberalized property laws, ended seigneurial dues, abolished the guild of merchants and craftsmen to facilitate entrepreneurship, legalized divorce, closed the Jewish ghettos and made Jews equal to everyone else. The Inquisition ended as did the Holy Roman Empire. The power of church courts and religious authority was sharply reduced and equality under the law was proclaimed for all men.[311]
Warfare
Statue in Cherbourg-Octeville unveiled by Napoleon III in 1858. Napoleon I strengthened the town’s defences to prevent British naval incursions.
In the field of military organization, Napoleon borrowed from previous theorists such as Jacques Antoine Hippolyte, Comte de Guibert, and from the reforms of preceding French governments, and then developed much of what was already in place. He continued the policy, which emerged from the Revolution, of promotion based primarily on merit.[312]
Corps replaced divisions as the largest army units, mobile artillery was integrated into reserve batteries, the staff system became more fluid and cavalry returned as an important formation in French military doctrine. These methods are now referred to as essential features of Napoleonic warfare.[312] Though he consolidated the practice of modern conscription introduced by the Directory, one of the restored monarchy’s first acts was to end it.[313]
His opponents learned from Napoleon’s innovations. The increased importance of artillery after 1807 stemmed from his creation of a highly mobile artillery force, the growth in artillery numbers, and changes in artillery practices. As a result of these factors, Napoleon, rather than relying on infantry to wear away the enemy’s defences, now could use massed artillery as a spearhead to pound a break in the enemy’s line that was then exploited by supporting infantry and cavalry. McConachy rejects the alternative theory that growing reliance on artillery by the French army beginning in 1807 was an outgrowth of the declining quality of the French infantry and, later, France’s inferiority in cavalry numbers.[314] Weapons and other kinds of military technology remained static through the Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras, but 18th-century operational mobility underwent change.[315]
Napoleon’s biggest influence was in the conduct of warfare. Antoine-Henri Jomini explained Napoleon’s methods in a widely used textbook that influenced all European and American armies.[316] Napoleon was regarded by the influential military theorist Carl von Clausewitz as a genius in the operational art of war, and historians rank him as a great military commander.[317] Wellington, when asked who was the greatest general of the day, answered: «In this age, in past ages, in any age, Napoleon».[318][incomplete short citation]
Under Napoleon, a new emphasis towards the destruction, not just outmaneuvering, of enemy armies emerged. Invasions of enemy territory occurred over broader fronts which made wars costlier and more decisive. The political effect of war increased; defeat for a European power meant more than the loss of isolated enclaves. Near-Carthaginian peaces intertwined whole national efforts, intensifying the Revolutionary phenomenon of total war.[319]
Metric system
The official introduction of the metric system in September 1799 was unpopular in large sections of French society. Napoleon’s rule greatly aided adoption of the new standard not only across France but also across the French sphere of influence. Napoleon took a retrograde step in 1812 when he passed legislation to introduce the mesures usuelles (traditional units of measurement) for retail trade,[320] a system of measure that resembled the pre-revolutionary units but were based on the kilogram and the metre; for example, the livre metrique (metric pound) was 500 g,[321] in contrast to the value of the livre du roi (the king’s pound), 489.5 g.[322] Other units of measure were rounded in a similar manner prior to the definitive introduction of the metric system across parts of Europe in the middle of the 19th century.[323]
Education
Napoleon’s educational reforms laid the foundation of a modern system of education in France and throughout much of Europe.[324] Napoleon synthesized the best academic elements from the Ancien Régime, The Enlightenment, and the Revolution, with the aim of establishing a stable, well-educated and prosperous society. He made French the only official language. He left some primary education in the hands of religious orders, but he offered public support to secondary education. Napoleon founded a number of state secondary schools (lycées) designed to produce a standardized education that was uniform across France.[325]
All students were taught the sciences along with modern and classical languages. Unlike the system during the Ancien Régime, religious topics did not dominate the curriculum, although they were present with the teachers from the clergy. Napoleon hoped to use religion to produce social stability.[325] He gave special attention to the advanced centers, such as the École Polytechnique, that provided both military expertise and state-of-the-art research in science.[326] Napoleon made some of the first efforts at establishing a system of secular and public education.[when?] The system featured scholarships and strict discipline, with the result being a French educational system that outperformed its European counterparts, many of which borrowed from the French system.[327]
Memory and evaluation
Criticism
In the political realm, historians debate whether Napoleon was «an enlightened despot who laid the foundations of modern Europe» or «a megalomaniac who wrought greater misery than any man before the coming of Hitler».[328] Many historians have concluded that he had grandiose foreign policy ambitions. The Continental powers as late as 1808 were willing to give him nearly all of his gains and titles, but some scholars maintain he was overly aggressive and pushed for too much, until his empire collapsed.[329][330]
He was considered a tyrant and usurper by his opponents at the time and ever since. His critics charge that he was not troubled when faced with the prospect of war and death for thousands, turned his search for undisputed rule into a series of conflicts throughout Europe and ignored treaties and conventions alike.[331] His role in the Haitian Revolution and decision to reinstate slavery in France’s overseas colonies are controversial and affect his reputation.[332] French liberal intellectual Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) was a staunch critic of political homogenisation and personality cult that dominated Napoleonic France and wrote several books condemning Napoleon such as «The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation» (1814) and «Principles of Politics Applicable to All Representative Governments» (1815). According to Constant, Bonapartism was even more tyrannical than the Bourbon monarchy, since it forced the masses to support its grand universalist narrative through imperialism and jingoism.[333]
Napoleon institutionalized plunder of conquered territories: French museums contain art stolen by Napoleon’s forces from across Europe. Artefacts were brought to the Musée du Louvre for a grand central museum; an example which would later be followed by others.[334] He was compared to Adolf Hitler by the historian Pieter Geyl in 1947,[335] and Claude Ribbe in 2005.[336] David G. Chandler, a historian of Napoleonic warfare, wrote in 1973 that, «Nothing could be more degrading to the former [Napoleon] and more flattering to the latter [Hitler]. The comparison is odious. On the whole Napoleon was inspired by a noble dream, wholly dissimilar from Hitler’s… Napoleon left great and lasting testimonies to his genius—in codes of law and national identities which survive to the present day. Adolf Hitler left nothing but destruction.»[337]
Critics argue Napoleon’s true legacy must reflect the loss of status for France and needless deaths brought by his rule: historian Victor Davis Hanson writes, «After all, the military record is unquestioned—17 years of wars, perhaps six million Europeans dead, France bankrupt, her overseas colonies lost.»[338] McLynn states that, «He can be viewed as the man who set back European economic life for a generation by the dislocating impact of his wars.»[331] Vincent Cronin replies that such criticism relies on the flawed premise that Napoleon was responsible for the wars which bear his name, when in fact France was the victim of a series of coalitions that aimed to destroy the ideals of the Revolution.[339]
British military historian Correlli Barnett calls him «a social misfit» who exploited France for his personal megalomaniac goals. He says Napoleon’s reputation is exaggerated.[340] French scholar Jean Tulard provided an influential account of his image as a saviour.[341] Louis Bergeron has praised the numerous changes he made to French society, especially regarding the law as well as education.[342] His greatest failure was the Russian invasion. Many historians have blamed Napoleon’s poor planning, but Russian scholars instead emphasize the Russian response, noting the notorious winter weather was just as hard on the defenders.[343]
The large and growing historiography in French, English, Russian, Spanish and other languages has been summarized and evaluated by numerous scholars.[344][345][346]
Propaganda and memory
1814 caricature of Napoleon being exiled to Elba: the ex-emperor is riding a donkey backwards while holding a broken sword.
Napoleon’s use of propaganda contributed to his rise to power, legitimated his régime, and established his image for posterity. Strict censorship, controlling various key constituents of the press, books, theatre, and art were part of his propaganda scheme, aimed at portraying him as bringing desperately wanted peace and stability to France. The propagandistic rhetoric changed in relation to events and to the atmosphere of Napoleon’s reign, focusing first on his role as a general in the army and identification as a soldier, and moving to his role as emperor and a civil leader. Specifically targeting his civilian audience, Napoleon fostered a relationship with the contemporary art community, taking an active role in commissioning and controlling different forms of art production to suit his propaganda goals.[347]
In England, Russia and across Europe—though not in France—Napoleon was a popular topic of caricature.[348][349][350]
Hazareesingh (2004) explores how Napoleon’s image and memory are best understood. They played a key role in collective political defiance of the Bourbon restoration monarchy in 1815–1830. People from different walks of life and areas of France, particularly Napoleonic veterans, drew on the Napoleonic legacy and its connections with the ideals of the 1789 Revolution.[351]
Widespread rumours of Napoleon’s return from St. Helena and Napoleon as an inspiration for patriotism, individual and collective liberties, and political mobilization manifested themselves in seditious materials, displaying the tricolor and rosettes. There were also subversive activities celebrating anniversaries of Napoleon’s life and reign and disrupting royal celebrations—they demonstrated the prevailing and successful goal of the varied supporters of Napoleon to constantly destabilize the Bourbon regime.[351]
Datta (2005) shows that, following the collapse of militaristic Boulangism in the late 1880s, the Napoleonic legend was divorced from party politics and revived in popular culture. Concentrating on two plays and two novels from the period—Victorien Sardou’s Madame Sans-Gêne (1893), Maurice Barrès’s Les Déracinés (1897), Edmond Rostand’s L’Aiglon (1900), and André de Lorde and Gyp’s Napoléonette (1913)—Datta examines how writers and critics of the Belle Époque exploited the Napoleonic legend for diverse political and cultural ends.[352]
Reduced to a minor character, the new fictional Napoleon became not a world historical figure but an intimate one, fashioned by individuals’ needs and consumed as popular entertainment. In their attempts to represent the emperor as a figure of national unity, proponents and detractors of the Third Republic used the legend as a vehicle for exploring anxieties about gender and fears about the processes of democratization that accompanied this new era of mass politics and culture.[352]
International Napoleonic Congresses take place regularly, with participation by members of the French and American military, French politicians and scholars from different countries.[353] In January 2012, the mayor of Montereau-Fault-Yonne, near Paris—the site of a late victory of Napoleon—proposed development of Napoleon’s Bivouac, a commemorative theme park at a projected cost of 200 million euros.[354]
Long-term influence outside France
Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform.[355] After the fall of Napoleon, not only was it retained by conquered countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of Italy and Germany, but it has been used as the basis of certain parts of law outside Europe including the Dominican Republic, the US state of Louisiana and the Canadian province of Quebec.[356] The code was also used as a model in many parts of Latin America.[357] The reputation of Napoleon in Poland has been favourable, especially for his support of independence, opposition to Russia, his legal code, the abolition of serfdom, and the introduction of modern middle class administration.[358]
Napoleon had an influence on the establishment of modern Germany. He caused the end of the Holy Roman Empire and helped create middle sized states such as Bavaria and Württemberg along the great powers Prussia and Austria. Although he also directly or indirectly helped to reduce the number of German states (from about 300 to fewer than 50), the middle sized states tried to prevent the unification of Germany as a federalist state. A byproduct of the French occupation was a strong development in German nationalism which eventually turned the German Confederation into the German Empire after a series of conflicts and other political developments.
Napoleon indirectly began the process of Latin American independence when he invaded Spain in 1808. The abdication of King Charles IV and renunciation of his son, Ferdinand VII created a power vacuum that was filled by native born political leaders such as Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín. Such leaders embraced nationalistic sentiments influenced by French nationalism and led successful independence movements in Latin America.[359]
Napoleon also significantly aided the United States when he agreed to sell the territory of Louisiana for 15 million dollars during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. That territory almost doubled the size of the United States, adding the equivalent of 13 states to the Union.[303]
From 1796 to 2020, at least 95 major ships were named for him. In the 21st century, at least 18 Napoleon ships are operated under the flag of France, as well as Indonesia, Germany, Italy, Australia, Argentina, India, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.[360]
Wives, mistresses, and children
Napoleon married Joséphine (née Marie Josèphe Rose Tascher de La Pagerie) in 1796, when he was 26; she was a 32-year-old widow whose first husband, Alexandre de Beauharnais, had been executed during the Reign of Terror. Five days after Alexandre de Beauharnais’ death, the Reign of Terror initiator Maximilien de Robespierre was overthrown and executed, and, with the help of high-placed friends, Joséphine was freed.[361] Until she met Bonaparte, she had been known as «Rose», a name which he disliked. He called her «Joséphine» instead, and she went by this name henceforth. Bonaparte often sent her love letters while on his campaigns.[362] He formally adopted her son Eugène and second cousin (via marriage) Stéphanie and arranged dynastic marriages for them. Joséphine had her daughter Hortense marry Napoleon’s brother Louis.[363]
Joséphine had lovers, such as Lieutenant Hippolyte Charles, during Napoleon’s Italian campaign.[364] Napoleon learnt of that affair and a letter he wrote about it was intercepted by the British and published widely, to embarrass Napoleon. Napoleon had his own affairs too: during the Egyptian campaign he took Pauline Bellisle Fourès, the wife of a junior officer, as his mistress. She became known as «Cleopatra».[k][366]
While Napoleon’s mistresses had children by him, Joséphine did not produce an heir, possibly because of either the stresses of her imprisonment during the Reign of Terror or an abortion she may have had in her twenties.[367] Napoleon chose divorce so he could remarry in search of an heir. Despite his divorce from Josephine, Napoleon showed his dedication to her for the rest of his life. When he heard the news of her death while in exile in Elba, he locked himself in his room and would not come out for two full days.[215] Her name would also be his final word on his deathbed in 1821.
On 11 March 1810 by proxy, he married the 19-year-old Marie Louise, Archduchess of Austria, and a great-niece of Marie Antoinette. Thus he had married into a German royal and imperial family.[368] Louise was less than happy with the arrangement, at least at first, stating: «Just to see the man would be the worst form of torture». Her great-aunt had been executed in France, while Napoleon had fought numerous campaigns against Austria all throughout his military career. However, she seemed to warm up to him over time. After her wedding, she wrote to her father: «He loves me very much. I respond to his love sincerely. There is something very fetching and very eager about him that is impossible to resist».[215]
Napoleon and Marie Louise remained married until his death, though she did not join him in exile on Elba and thereafter never saw her husband again. The couple had one child, Napoleon Francis Joseph Charles (1811–1832), known from birth as the King of Rome. He became Napoleon II in 1814 and reigned for only two weeks. He was awarded the title of the Duke of Reichstadt in 1818 and died of tuberculosis aged 21, with no children.[368]
Napoleon acknowledged one illegitimate son: Charles Léon (1806–1881) by Eléonore Denuelle de La Plaigne.[369] Alexandre Colonna-Walewski (1810–1868), the son of his mistress Maria Walewska, although acknowledged by Walewska’s husband, was also widely known to be his child, and the DNA of his direct male descendant has been used to help confirm Napoleon’s Y-chromosome haplotype.[370] He may have had further unacknowledged illegitimate offspring as well, such as Eugen Megerle von Mühlfeld by Emilie Victoria Kraus von Wolfsberg[371] and Hélène Napoleone Bonaparte (1816–1907) by Albine de Montholon.
Notes
- ^ , French: Napoléon Bonaparte [napɔleɔ̃ bɔnapaʁt]; Italian: Napoleone Bonaparte, [napoleˈoːne ˌbɔnaˈparte]; Corsican: Napulione Buonaparte.
- ^ French: Napoléon Ier
- ^ He established a system of public education,[7] abolished the vestiges of feudalism,[8] emancipated Jews and other religious minorities,[9] abolished the Spanish Inquisition,[10] enacted legal protections for an emerging middle class,[11] and centralized state power at the expense of religious authorities.[12]
- ^ His brother, also called Napoleon, died at birth and his sister, Maria Anna, died shortly before her first birthday. In total, two siblings died at birth and three died in infancy.
- ^ Although the 1768 Treaty of Versailles formally ceded Corsica’s rights, it remained un-incorporated during 1769[18] until it became a province of France in 1770.[19] Corsica would be legally integrated as a département in 1789.[20][21]
- ^ Aside from his name, there does not appear to be a connection between him and Napoleon’s theorem.[35]
- ^ He was mainly referred to as Bonaparte until he became First Consul for life.[40]
- ^ This is depicted in Bonaparte Crossing the Alps by Hippolyte Delaroche and in Jacques-Louis David’s imperial Napoleon Crossing the Alps. He is less realistically portrayed on a charger in the latter work.[100]
- ^ It was customary to cast a death mask of a leader. At least four genuine death masks of Napoleon are known to exist: one in The Cabildo in New Orleans, one in a Liverpool museum, another in Havana and one in the library of the University of North Carolina.[241]
- ^ The body can tolerate large doses of arsenic if ingested regularly, and arsenic was a fashionable cure-all.[248]
- ^ One night, during an illicit liaison with actress Marguerite Georges, Napoleon had a major fit. This and other more minor attacks have led historians to debate whether he had epilepsy and, if so, to what extent.[365]
Citations
- ^ «Fac-similé de l’acte de baptême de Napoléon, rédigé en italien. – Images d’Art» [Facsimile of Napoleon’s baptismal certificate, written in Italian. – Art Pictures] (in French).
- ^ a b Roberts 2014, Introduction
- ^ Charles Messenger, ed. (2001). Reader’s Guide to Military History. Routledge. pp. 391–427. ISBN 978-1-135-95970-8.
- ^ Roberts, A. (2016). Napoleon the Great. United Kingdom: Penguin Books Limited. (p. 1)
- ^ a b c Geoffrey Ellis (1997). Napoleon. Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 9781317874690.
- ^ Forrest, Alan (26 March 2015). Waterloo: Great Battles. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0199663255. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
- ^ Grab 2003, p. 56.
- ^ Broers, M. and Hicks, P.The Napoleonic Empire and the New European Political Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, p. 230
- ^ Conner, S. P. The Age of Napoleon. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004, pp. 38–40.
- ^ Perez, Joseph. The Spanish Inquisition: A History. Yale University Press, 2005, p. 98
- ^ Fremont-Barnes, G. and Fisher, T. The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Osprey Publishing, 2004, p. 336
- ^ Grab, A. Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, Conclusion
- ^ Andrew Roberts, Napoleon: A Life (2014) p. xxxiii
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 2
- ^ Gueniffey, Patrice (13 April 2015). Bonaparte. Harvard University Press. pp. 21–22. ISBN 978-0-674-42601-6.
- ^ a b Dwyer 2008a, ch 1
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. xv
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 6
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 20
- ^ «Corsica | History, Geography, & Points of Interest». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 28 November 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 142.
- ^ a b Cronin 1994, pp. 20–21
- ^ Chamberlain, Alexander (1896). The Child and Childhood in Folk Thought: (The Child in Primitive Culture), p. 385. MacMillan.
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 27
- ^ a b c International School History (8 February 2012), Napoleon’s Rise to Power, archived from the original on 8 May 2015, retrieved 29 January 2018
- ^ Johnson, Paul (2006). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-303745-3. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ a b c Roberts 2001, p. xvi
- ^ a b c Murari·Culture·, Edoardo (20 August 2019). «Italians Of The Past: Napoleon Bonaparte». Italics Magazine. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- ^ a b Roberts 2014.
- ^ a b c d Parker, Harold T. (1971). «The Formation of Napoleon’s Personality: An Exploratory Essay». French Historical Studies. 7 (1): 6–26. doi:10.2307/286104. JSTOR 286104.
- ^ Adams, Michael (2014). Napoleon and Russia. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-4212-3. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 11.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 18
- ^ Grégoire, Henri (1790). «Report on the necessity and means to annihilate the patois and to universalise the use of the French language». Wikisource (in French). Paris: French National Convention. Retrieved 16 January 2020.
[…] the number of people who speak it purely does not exceed three million; and probably the number of those who write it correctly is even fewer.
- ^ Wells 1992, p. 74
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 21
- ^ Chandler 1973, pp. 12–14.
- ^ a b Dwyer 2008a, p. 42
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 26
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 290
- ^ Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, Corsica.
- ^ Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, Revolution.
- ^ David Nicholls (1999). Napoleon: A Biographical Companion. ABC-CLIO. p. 131. ISBN 978-0-87436-957-1.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 55
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 61
- ^ a b c d e Roberts 2001, p. xviii
- ^ Roberts, Andrew (2011). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-698-17628-7.
- ^ «Napoleon I | Biography, Achievements, & Facts». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 12 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 132
- ^ Dwyer, p. 136.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 76
- ^ Patrice Gueniffey, Bonaparte: 1769–1802 (Harvard UP, 2015), pp. 137–59.
- ^ Bourrienne, Memoirs of Napoleon, p. 39
- ^ Bourrienne, Memoirs of Napoleon, p. 38
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 157
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 76, 84
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 92
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 26
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 164
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 93
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 96
- ^ Johnson 2002, p. 27
- ^ Carlyle, Thomas (1896). «The works of Thomas Carlyle – The French Revolution, vol. III, book 3.VII». Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ Englund (2010) pp. 92–94
- ^ Bell 2015, p. 29.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, pp. 284–85
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 132
- ^ Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte, Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne, pp 158.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 145
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 142
- ^ Harvey 2006, p. 179
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 135
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 306
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 305
- ^ Bell 2015, p. 30.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 322
- ^ a b c Watson 2003, pp. 13–14
- ^ Amini 2000, p. 12
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 342
- ^ Englund (2010) pp. 127–28
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 175
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 179
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 372
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 188.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 392
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, pp. 411–24
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 198.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 189
- ^ Gueniffey, Bonaparte: 1769–1802 pp. 500–02.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 442
- ^ a b c Connelly 2006, p. 57
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, pp. 205–206.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 444
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 455
- ^ François Furet, The French Revolution, 1770–1814 (1996), p. 212
- ^ Georges Lefebvre, Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799–1807 (1969), pp. 60–68
- ^ a b c d Lyons 1994, p. 111
- ^ Lefebvre, Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799–1807 (1969), pp. 71–92
- ^ Holt, Lucius Hudson; Chilton, Alexander Wheeler (1919). A Brief History of Europe from 1789–1815. Macmillan. p. 206.
August 1802 referendum napoleon.
- ^ Chandler 2002, p. 51
- ^ Chandler 1966, pp. 279–281
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 235
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 292
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 293
- ^ a b c Chandler 1966, p. 296
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, pp. 298–304
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 301
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 302
- ^ a b Lyons 1994, pp. 111–114
- ^ a b c d Lyons 1994, p. 113
- ^ Edwards 1999, p. 55
- ^ James, C. L. R. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution, [1963] (Penguin Books, 2001), pp. 141–142.
- ^ «French Emancipation». obo.
- ^ «May 10th 1802, «The last cry of innocence and despair»«. herodote (in French). Retrieved 6 December 2019.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 301.
- ^ James, C. L. R. (1963) [1938]. The Black Jacobins (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage Books. pp. 45–55. OCLC 362702.
- ^ «CHRONOLOGY-Who banned slavery when?». Reuters. Thomson Reuters. 22 March 2007. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Oldfield, Dr John (17 February 2011). «British Anti-slavery». BBC History. BBC. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Perry, James Arrogant Armies Great Military Disasters and the Generals Behind Them, (Edison: Castle Books, 2005) pp. 78–79.
- ^ Christer Petley, White Fury: A Jamaican Slaveholder and the Age of Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), p. 182.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 303.
- ^ Connelly 2006, p. 70
- ^ Mowat R B (1924). The Diplomacy Of Nepoleon.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 265
- ^ Zamoyski, pp. 338–339.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 243
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 296
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 297
- ^ De Rémusat, Claire Elisabeth, Memoirs of Madame De Rémusat, 1802–1808 Volume 1, HardPress Publishing, 2012, 542 pp., ISBN 978-1-290-51747-8.
- ^ a b c d Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, p. 355.
- ^ Dwyer, Philip (2015). «‘Citizen Emperor’: Political Ritual, Popular Sovereignty and the Coronation of Napoleon I». History. 100 (339): 40–57. doi:10.1111/1468-229X.12089. ISSN 1468-229X.
- ^ Paul W. Schroeder, The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848 (1996) pp. 231–286
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 328. Meanwhile, French territorial rearrangements in Germany occurred without Russian consultation and Napoleon’s annexations in the Po valley increasingly strained relations between the two.
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 331
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 323
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 332
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, p. 333
- ^ Michael J. Hughes, Forging Napoleon’s Grande Armée: Motivation, Military Culture, and Masculinity in the French Army, 1800–1808 (NYU Press, 2012).
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 321
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 332
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 108
- ^ Andrew Uffindell, Great Generals of the Napoleonic Wars. p. 15
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 156.
- ^ «Napoleon: Napoleon at War». www.pbs.org. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 156. «It is a historical cliché to compare the Schlieffen Plan with Hannibal’s tactical envelopment at Cannae (216 BC); Schlieffen owed more to Napoleon’s strategic maneuver on Ulm (1805)».
- ^ Glover (1967), pp. 233–252.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 407.
- ^ a b c Adrian Gilbert (2000). The Encyclopedia of Warfare: From Earliest Time to the Present Day. Taylor & Francis. p. 133. ISBN 978-1-57958-216-6. Archived from the original on 29 July 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 414
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 414
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 350
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 344
- ^ Karsh 2001, p. 12
- ^ Sicker 2001, p. 99.
- ^ Michael V. Leggiere (2015). Napoleon and Berlin: The Franco-Prussian War in North Germany, 1813. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-8061-8017-5. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016.
- ^ a b c Chandler 1966, pp. 467–468
- ^ a b c Brooks 2000, p. 110
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 497
- ^ Jacques Godechot et al. Napoleonic Era in Europe (1971) pp. 126–139
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 370
- ^ a b August Fournier (1911). Napoleon I.: A Biography. H. Holt. p. 459.
- ^ The History of Napoleon Bonaparte by John Stevens Cabot Abbott, 1882, p. 559
- ^ Roberts, pp. 458–459
- ^ a b Roberts, pp. 459–461
- ^ Horne, Alistair (1997). How Far From Austerlitz? Napoleon 1805–1815. Pan Macmillan. p. 238. ISBN 978-1-74328-540-4. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ Todd Fisher & Gregory Fremont-Barnes, The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. p. 197.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes pp. 198–199.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes p. 199.
- ^ Chandler, pp. 620
- ^ Engman, Max (2016). «Finland and the Napoleonic Empire». In Planert, Ute (ed.). Napoleon’s Empire. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 227–238. doi:10.1057/9781137455475_16. ISBN 978-1-349-56731-7 – via Springer Link.
- ^ «The Erfurt Convention 1808». Napoleon-series.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes p. 205.
- ^ Hope, John; Baird, D. (28 January 1809). «Battle of Corunna». Vol. 15, no. 4. Cobbett’s political register. pp. 91–94.
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, pp. 659–660
- ^ John Lynch, Caudillos in Spanish America 1800–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992, pp. 402–403.
- ^ a b c Fisher & Fremont-Barnes, p. 106.
- ^ Gill, pp. 44–45
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 690
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 690
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 706
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 707
- ^ a b Chandler 1973, p. 708.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 720.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 729.
- ^ «The British Expeditionary Force to Walcheren: 1809». napoleon-series.org. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
- ^ a b Todd Fisher & Gregory Fremont-Barnes, The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. p. 144.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 732.
- ^ David Watkin, The Roman Forum. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2012. 183.
ISBN 978-0-674-06367-9
books.google.com/books?id=cRrufMNLOhwC&pg=PA183 - ^ McLynn 1998, p. 378
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 495
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 507
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 506
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 504–505
- ^ Harvey 2006, p. 773
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 518
- ^ Markham 1988, p. 194
- ^ «Napoleon1812». napoleon-1812.nl. Archived from the original on 13 February 2016.
- ^ Markham 1988, pp. 190, 199
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 541
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 549
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 565
- ^ Chandler 1995, p. 1020
- ^ a b Riley, J.P. (2013). Napoleon and the World War of 1813: Lessons in Coalition Warfighting. Routledge. p. 206. ISBN 978-1-136-32135-1. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
- ^ Leggiere (2007). The Fall of Napoleon: Volume 1, The Allied Invasion of France, 1813–1814. pp. 53–54. ISBN 978-0-521-87542-4. Archived from the original on 21 September 2015.
- ^ Fremont-Barnes 2004, p. 14
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 585
- ^ Gates 2003, p. 259.
- ^ Lieven, Dominic (2010). Russia Against Napoleon: The True Story of the Campaigns of War and Peace. Penguin. pp. 484–485. ISBN 978-1-101-42938-9. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ a b Prutsch, M. (2012). Making Sense of Constitutional Monarchism in Post-Napoleonic France and Germany. Springer. pp. 10–15. ISBN 9781137291653.
- ^ A. Bell, David (2015). «5: Downfall, 1812–1815». Napoleon: A Concise Biography. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6.
- ^ «Napoleon’s act of abdication». Bulletin des lois de la Republique Française. July 1814. Archived from the original on 22 December 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 593–594
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 597
- ^ Latson, Jennifer. «Why Napoleon Probably Should Have Just Stayed in Exile the First Time». Archived from the original on 25 June 2016.
- ^ a b c «PBS – Napoleon: Napoleon and Josephine». PBS. Archived from the original on 21 August 2017.
- ^ a b c McLynn 1998, p. 604
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 605
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 607
- ^ Chesney 2006, p. 35
- ^ Cordingly 2004, p. 254
- ^ Cox, Dale (2015). Nicolls’ outpost : a War of 1812 fort at Chattahoochee, Florida. Old Kitchen Books. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-692-37936-3.
- ^ Hibbert, Christopher (2003). Napoleon’s Women. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 272. ISBN 978-0-393-32499-0. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ^ Information, Reed Business (28 October 1982). «Napoleon’s moulds». New Scientist: 257.
- ^ Schom 1997, pp. 769–70
- ^ «Two Days at Saint Helena». The Spirit of the English Magazines. Monroe and Francis: 402. 1832. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ^ Jones, David (14 October 1982). «The Singular Case of Napoleon’s Wallpaper». New Scientist: 101.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 642
- ^ «A JOURNEY TO ST. HELENA, HOME OF NAPOLEON’S LAST DAYS». Retrieved 18 March 2021.
- ^ I, Napoleon; Marchand, Louis Joseph (29 October 2017). Chronicles of Caesar’s Wars: The First-Ever Translation. Translated by Barzani, Arshan (1 ed.). Clio Books. Archived from the original on 3 December 2017.
- ^ Hicks, Peter. «Napoleon’s English Lessons». Napoleon.org. Archived from the original on 18 September 2016. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
- ^ a b Price, Munro (2014). «Epilogue: The Hundred Days». Napoleon: The End of Glory. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-19-966080-3.
- ^ a b Arnold (2011), p. 310.
- ^ «Napoleon I — Exile on St. Helena | Britannica». www.britannica.com. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ Henshaw (1870), p. 10.
- ^ Wilkins 1972
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 651
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 638–639.
- ^ a b c McLynn 1998, p. 655
- ^ Roberts, Napoleon (2014) 799–801
- ^ «Napoleon had a ‘very small’ penis according to C4 show». The Independent. 4 April 2014. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
- ^ Fulghum 2007
- ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 293–295
- ^ Driskel 1993, p. 168
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 656
- ^ Johnson 2002, pp. 180–181
- ^ a b c Cullen 2008, pp. 146–148
- ^ a b Cullen 2008, p. 156
- ^ Cullen 2008, p. 50
- ^ Cullen 2008, p. 161, and Hindmarsh et al. 2008, p. 2092
- ^ a b «L’Empire et le Saint-Siège». Napoleon.org. Archived from the original on 19 September 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2011.
- ^ Wachtel, Albert (1992). The Cracked Lookingglass: James Joyce and the Nightmare of History. Susquehanna University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-945636-27-4.
- ^ Joyce, James (2005). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Collector’s Library. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-904919-54-4.
- ^ «Napoleon’s «divorce»«. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
- ^ «catholictextbookproject.com». Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
- ^ Bledsoe, Albert Taylor; Herrick, Sophia M’Ilvaine Bledsoe (1871). «The Responsibility of Men for their Belief». The Southern review, Volume 9. p. 528. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
- ^ Confidential Correspondence of the Emperor Napoleon and the Empress Josephine: Including Letters from the Time of Their Marriage Until the Death of Josephine, and Also Several Private Letters from the Emperor to His Brother Joseph, and Other Important Personages. With Numerous Illustrative Notes … Mason Brothers. 1856. p. 359.
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and I have founded empires. But on what did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. Jesus Christ founded his empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for him
- ^ Cyclopædia of Moral and Religious Anecdote [abridged from the larger «Cyclopædia» of K. Arvine], with an introductory essay by the Rev. George Cheever. J. J. Griffin & Company. 1851. p. 58.
- ^ Cases, Emmanuel-Auguste-Dieudonné comte de Las (1855). Memoirs of the Life, Exile, and Conversations of the Emperor Napoleon. Redfield.
- ^ William Roberts, «Napoleon, the Concordat of 1801, and Its Consequences». in by Frank J. Coppa, ed., Controversial Concordats: The Vatican’s Relations with Napoleon, Mussolini, and Hitler (1999) pp. 34–80.
- ^ Nigel Aston, Religion and revolution in France, 1780–1804 (Catholic University of America Press, 2000) pp. 279–315
- ^ Nigel Aston, Christianity and revolutionary Europe, 1750–1830 (Cambridge University Press, 2002) pp. 261–62.
- ^ Luis Granados (2012). Damned Good Company. Humanist Press. pp. 182–83. ISBN 978-0-931779-24-4. Archived from the original on 22 September 2015.
- ^ a b «When Napoleon Captured the Pope». The New York Times. 13 December 1981. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
- ^ «Napoleon and the Pope: From the Concordat to the Excommunication». Archived from the original on 24 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ «Concordat Of Fontainebleau». Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
- ^ «Pius VII | pope». Archived from the original on 2 May 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2017.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 436
- ^ a b Green, David B. (9 February 2014). «This Day in Jewish History / The Sanhedrin of Paris Convenes at the Behest of Napoleon». Haaretz. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
- ^ Schwarzfuchs 1979, p. 50
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 315
- ^ «Napoleon Bonaparte». A few famous freemasons. Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon A.F. & A. M. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
- ^ Pieter Geyl, Napoleon, For and Against (1982)
- ^ George F.E. Rudé (1988). The French Revolution. Grove Weidenfeld. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-8021-3272-7. Archived from the original on 26 September 2015.
- ^ Jack Coggins (1966). Soldiers And Warriors: An Illustrated History. Courier Dover Publications. p. 187. ISBN 978-0-486-45257-9.
- ^ Sally Waller (2002). France in Revolution, 1776–1830. Heinemann. p. 188. ISBN 978-0-435-32732-3.
- ^ See David Chandler, «General Introduction» to his The Campaigns of Napoleon: The Mind and Method of History’s Greatest Soldier (1975).
- ^ Price, Munro (2014). «1: Napoleon and his Empire, December 1812». Napoleon: The End of Glory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-19-966080-3.
- ^ Roberts, Napoleon: A Life (2014) pp. 470–73
- ^ Gregory R. Copley (2007). The Art of Victory: Strategies for Personal Success and Global Survival in a Changing World. Simon and Schuster. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-4165-2478-6.
- ^ Dwyer 2013, pp. 175–76
- ^ Ellis, Geoffrey (16 May 2003). The Napoleonic Empire. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 125. ISBN 978-1-4039-4401-6.
- ^ J. M. Thompson, Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall (1954), p. 285
- ^ Christopher Hibbert (1999). Wellington: A Personal History. Da Capo Press. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-7382-0148-1.
- ^ Steven Englund, Napoleon: A Political Life (2004), pp. 379ff
- ^ van Crevald, Martin (1987). Command in War. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-674-14441-5.
- ^ «Napoleon Bonaparte (Character)». Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 18 November 2017. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ Bell 2007, p. 13
- ^ «Most Popular Napoleon Bonaparte Movies and TV Shows». Internet Movie Database. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ The German original, der größte Meister des Machiavellismus, means «the greatest master of Machiavellism» but is mistranslated and misspelled with capitalization as «the greatest Maestro of Machiavellism» in Bourke, Skinner, Richard, Quentin; Kelly, Duncan (2016). «11: Popular sovereignty as state theory in the nineteenth century». Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. University Printing House, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 280–281. ISBN 978-1-107-13040-1.
- ^ The Fortnightly, Volume 114. Chapman and Hall, 1923. p. 836.
- ^ Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne. «Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte.» Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1889. Vol. 1, p. 7.
- ^ Kircheisen, F. M. Napoleon New York : Harcourt, Brace, 1932
- ^ Davydov, Denis. In the Service of the Tsar Against Napoleon: The Memoirs of Denis Davydov, 1806–1814. Translation by Gregory Troubetzkoy. Greenhill Books, 1999. p. 64.
- ^ «Greatest cartooning coup of all time: The Brit who convinced everyone Napoleon was short». National Post. 28 April 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2017.
- ^ Roberts 2004, p. 93
- ^ «Was Napoleon Short? | Britannica». www.britannica.com. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ a b c Owen Connelly (2006). Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military Campaigns. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- ^ «The Myth of Napoleon’s Height: How a Single Image Can Change History». Entity. 13 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 January 2018. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
- ^ Seward, Desmond. Napoleon’s Family. New York: Viking, 1986.
- ^ The Bookman, Vol. 29, p. 304. Diary of Capt. Ross, commander of the Northumberland.
- ^ Bordes 2007, p. 118.
- ^ Hall 2006, p. 181
- ^ a b McGraw-Hill’s, US History 2012, pp. 112–13[clarification needed]
- ^ Blaufarb 2007, pp. 101–02
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 255
- ^ Bernard Schwartz (1998). The Code Napoleon and the Common-law World. The Lawbook Exchange. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-886363-59-5. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
- ^ Wood 2007, p. 55
- ^ Scheck 2008, Chapter: The Road to National Unification
- ^ Astarita 2005, p. 264
- ^ Alter 2006, pp. 61–76
- ^ Robert R. Palmer and Joel Colton, A History of the Modern World (New York: McGraw Hill, 1995), pp. 428–29
- ^ a b Archer et al. 2002, p. 397
- ^ Flynn 2001, p. 16
- ^ McConachy, Bruce (2001). «The Roots of Artillery Doctrine: Napoleonic Artillery Tactics Reconsidered» (PDF). The Journal of Military History. 65 (3): 617–640. doi:10.2307/2677528. JSTOR 2677528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2012.
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 383
- ^ John Shy, «Jomini» in Peter Paret, ed. Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (1986).
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 380
- ^ Roberts 2001, p. 272
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 404
- ^ Hallock, William; Wade, Herbert T (1906). «Outlines of the evolution of weights and measures and the metric system». London: The Macmillan Company. pp. 66–69.
- ^ Denis Février. «Un historique du mètre» (in French). Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie. Archived from the original on 28 February 2011. Retrieved 10 March 2011.
- ^ Thierry Sabot (1 October 2000). «Les poids et mesures sous l’Ancien Régime» [The weights and measures of the Ancien Régime] (in French). histoire-genealogie. Archived from the original on 5 December 2010. Retrieved 10 February 2011.
- ^ O’Connor 2003
- ^ Clive Emsley (2014). Napoleon: Conquest, Reform and Reorganisation. Routledge. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-317-61028-1. Archived from the original on 18 October 2015.
- ^ a b Williams, L. Pearce (1956). «Science, Education and Napoleon I». Isis. 47 (4): 369–382. doi:10.1086/348507. JSTOR 226629. S2CID 144112149.
- ^ Margaret Bradley, «Scientific education versus military training: the influence of Napoleon Bonaparte on the École Polytechnique». Annals of science (1975) 32#5 pp. 415–49.
- ^ Roberts 2014, pp. 278–81
- ^ Hastings, Max (31 October 2014). «Everything is Owed to Glory». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 13 November 2014.
- ^ Charles Esdaile, Napoleon’s Wars: An International History 1803–1815 (2008), p. 39
- ^ Colin S. Gray (2007). War, Peace and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History. Routledge. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-134-16951-1. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 666
- ^ Repa, Jan (2 December 2005). «Furore over Austerlitz ceremony». BBC. Archived from the original on 20 April 2010. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
- ^ Bourke, Skinner, Richard, Quentin; Garstan, Bryan (2016). «10: From popular sovereignty to civil society in post-revolutionary France». Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. University Printing House, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 254–255, 258–259. ISBN 978-1-107-13040-1.
- ^ Poulos 2000
- ^ Geyl 1947
- ^ Dwyer 2008b
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. xliii.
- ^ Hanson 2003
- ^ Cronin 1994, pp. 342–43
- ^ Correlli Barnett, Bonaparte (1978)
- ^ Jean Tulard, Napoleon: The Myth of the Saviour (1984)
- ^ Bergeron, Louis (1981). France Under Napoleon. Princeton U.P. ISBN 978-0-691-00789-2.
- ^ Dominic Lieven, «Review article: Russia and the defeat of Napoleon.» Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History (2006) 7#2 pp. 283–308.
- ^ Robert S. Alexander, Napoleon (Oxford University Press, 2001), examines major debates among historians.
- ^ Western Society for French History (1974). Proceedings of the … Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History. Issues for have subtitle:Selected papers of the … Annual Meeting. Las Cruces, N.M.: New Mexico State University Press.
- ^ John Dunne, «Recent Napoleonic Historiography: ‘Poor Relation’ Makes Good?» French History (2004) 18#4 pp. 484–91.
- ^ Alan Forrest, «Propaganda and the Legitimation of Power in Napoleonic France». French History, 2004 18(4): 426–45
- ^ Richardson, Hubert N. B. (1920). A dictionary of Napoleon and his times. University of California Libraries. London, New York [etc.] : Cassell and company, ltd.
- ^ Mark, Bryant, «Broadsides against Boney.» History Today 60.1 (2010): 52+
- ^ Mark Bryant, Napoleonic Wars in Cartoons (Grub Street, 2009).
- ^ a b Sudhir Hazareesingh, «Memory and Political Imagination: the Legend of Napoleon Revisited». French History, 2004 18(4): 463–83
- ^ a b Venita Datta, «‘L’appel Au Soldat’: Visions of the Napoleonic Legend in Popular Culture of the Belle Epoque». French Historical Studies 2005 28(1): 1–30
- ^ «Call for Papers: International Napoleonic Society, Fourth International Napoleonic Congress». La Fondation Napoléon. Archived from the original on 8 January 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2008.
- ^ Laurent, Ottavi (8 February 2012). «A New Napoleonic Campaign for Montereau». Foundation Napoleon. Archived from the original on 29 September 2013.
- ^ Grab 2003, country by country analysis
- ^ «Napoleonic Code». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 29 December 2011. Retrieved 13 April 2012.
- ^ Lobingier, Charles Sumner (December 1918). «Napoleon and His Code». Harvard Law Review. 32 (2): 114–134. doi:10.2307/1327640. ISSN 0017-811X. JSTOR 1327640.
- ^ Andrzej Nieuwazny, «Napoleon and Polish identity». History Today, May 1998 vol. 48 no. 5 pp. 50–55
- ^ «The Crisis of 1808». www.brown.edu. Brown University. Retrieved 6 May 2021.
- ^ «Яндекс». yandex.ru. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ «Biography of Joesephine de Beauharnais». Archived from the original on 28 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 117
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 271
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 118
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 284
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 188
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 100
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 663
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 630
- ^ Lucotte, Gérard; Macé, Jacques & Hrechdakian, Peter (September 2013). «Reconstruction of the Lineage Y Chromosome Haplotype of Napoléon the First» (PDF). International Journal of Sciences. 2 (9): 127–39. ISSN 2305-3925. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 April 2014.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 423
References
Biographical studies
- Abbott, John (2005). Life of Napoleon Bonaparte. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4179-7063-6.
- Bell, David A. (2015). Napoleon: A Concise Biography. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6. only 140pp; by a scholar
- Blaufarb, Rafe (2007). Napoleon: Symbol for an Age, A Brief History with Documents. Bedford. ISBN 978-0-312-43110-5.
- Broers, Michael (2015). Napoleon: Soldier of Destiny. Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0571273454.
- Chandler, David (2002). Napoleon. Leo Cooper. ISBN 978-0-85052-750-6.
- Cronin, Vincent (1994). Napoleon. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-637521-0.
- Dwyer, Philip (2008a). Napoleon: The Path to Power. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300137545.
- Dwyer, Philip (2013). Citizen Emperor: Napoleon in Power. Yale University Press. ASIN B00GGSG3W4.
- Englund, Steven (2010). Napoleon: A Political Life. Scribner. ISBN 978-0-674-01803-7.
- Gueniffey, Patrice. Bonaparte: 1769–1802 (Harvard UP, 2015, French edition 2013); 1008 pp.; vol 1 of most comprehensive recent scholarly biography by leading French specialist; less emphasis on battles and campaigns excerpt; also online review
- Johnson, Paul (2002). Napoleon: A life. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-670-03078-1.; 200 pp.; quite hostile
- Lefebvre, Georges (1969). Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit, 1799–1807. Columbia University Press. influential wide-ranging history
- Lefebvre, Georges (1969). Napoleon: from Tilsit to Waterloo, 1807–1815. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231033138.
- Lyons, Martyn (1994). Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. St. Martin’s Press.
- Markham, Felix (1963). Napoleon. Mentor.; 303 pp.; short biography by an Oxford scholar online
- McLynn, Frank (1998). Napoleon. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-6247-5. ASIN 0712662472.
- Roberts, Andrew (2014). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group. ISBN 978-0-670-02532-9.
- Thompson, J.M. (1951). Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall. Oxford U.P., 412 pp.; by an Oxford scholar
- Zamoyski, Adam (2018). Napoleon: The Man Behind The Myth. Great Britain: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-811607-1.
Primary sources
- Babelon, Jean-Pierre, D’Huart, Suzanne and De Jonge, Alex. Napoleon’s Last Will and Testament. Paddington Press Ltd. New York & London. 1977. ISBN 0-448-22190-X.
- Broadley, A. M., and J. Holland Rose. Napoleon in caricature 1795–1821 (John Lane, 1911) online, illustrated
- Gourgaud, Gaspard (1903) [1899]. Talks of Napoleon at St. Helena. Translated from the French by Elizabeth Wormeley Latimer. Chicago: A.C. McClurg.
Historiography and memory
- Broadley, Alexander Meyrick (1911). Napoleon in Caricature 1795-1821. John Lane, 1911 Caricature.
- Dwyer, Philip G. (2004). «Napoleon Bonaparte as Hero and Saviour: Image, Rhetoric and Behaviour in the Construction of a Legend». French History. 18 (4): 379–403. doi:10.1093/fh/18.4.379.
- Dwyer, Philip (2008b). «Remembering and Forgetting in Contemporary France: Napoleon, Slavery, and the French History Wars». French Politics, Culture & Society. 26 (3): 110–22. doi:10.3167/fpcs.2008.260306.
- Englund, Steven. «Napoleon and Hitler». Journal of the Historical Society (2006) 6#1 pp. 151–69.
- Geyl, Pieter (1982) [1947]. Napoleon For and Against. Penguin Books.
- Hanson, Victor Davis (2003). «The Claremont Institute: The Little Tyrant, A review of Napoleon: A Penguin Life«. The Claremont Institute.
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir (2005). The Legend of Napoleon. excerpt and text search
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir. «Memory and Political Imagination: The Legend of Napoleon Revisited», French History (2004) 18#4 pp. 463–83.
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir (2005). «Napoleonic Memory in Nineteenth-Century France: The Making of a Liberal Legend». MLN. 120 (4): 747–73. doi:10.1353/mln.2005.0119. S2CID 154508777.
- Porterfield, Todd, and Susan Siegfried. Staging Empire: Napoleon, Ingres, and David (Penn State Press, 2006). online review.
Specialty studies
- Alder, Ken (2002). The Measure of All Things – The Seven-Year Odyssey and Hidden Error That Transformed the World. Free Press. ISBN 978-0-7432-1675-3.
- Alter, Peter (2006). T. C. W. Blanning and Hagen Schulze (ed.). Unity and Diversity in European Culture c. 1800. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-726382-2.
- Amini, Iradj (2000). Napoleon and Persia. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-934211-58-1.
- Archer, Christon I.; Ferris, John R.; Herwig, Holger H. (2002). World History of Warfare. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-4423-8.
- Astarita, Tommaso (2005). Between Salt Water And Holy Water: A History Of Southern Italy. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-05864-2.
- Bell, David (2007). The First Total War. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-618-34965-4.
- Bordes, Philippe (2007). Jacques-Louis David. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12346-3.
- Brooks, Richard (2000). Atlas of World Military History. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-7607-2025-7.
- Chandler, David (1966). The Campaigns of Napoleon. New York: Scribner. ISBN 978-0-02-523660-8. OCLC 740560411.
- Chandler, David (1973) [1966]. Napoleon. ISBN 978-0841502543.
- Chesney, Charles (2006). Waterloo Lectures:A Study Of The Campaign Of 1815. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4286-4988-0.
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2018). Napoleon’s 1796 Italian Campaign. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2676-2
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2020). Napoleon Absent, Coalition Ascendant: The 1799 Campaign in Italy and Switzerland, Volume 1. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-3025-7
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2021). The Coalition Crumbles, Napoleon Returns: The 1799 Campaign in Italy and Switzerland, Volume 2. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-3034-9
- Connelly, Owen (2006). Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military Campaigns. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- Cordingly, David (2004). The Billy Ruffian: The Bellerophon and the Downfall of Napoleon. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-58234-468-3.
- Cullen, William (2008). Is Arsenic an Aphrodisiac?. Royal Society of Chemistry. ISBN 978-0-85404-363-7.
- Dobi.A. 1974. “For the Emperor-Bibliophile, Only the Very Best.” Wilson Library Bulletin 49 (November): 229–33.
- Driskel, Paul (1993). As Befits a Legend. Kent State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87338-484-1.
- Esdaile, Charles J. (2003). The Peninsular War: A New History. Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-6231-7.
- Flynn, George Q. (2001). Conscription and democracy: The Draft in France, Great Britain, and the United States. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-31912-9.
- Fremont-Barnes, Gregory; Fisher, Todd (2004). The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-831-1.
- Fulghum, Neil (2007). «Death Mask of Napoleon». University of North Carolina. Archived from the original on 26 July 2013. Retrieved 4 August 2008.
- Gates, David (2001). The Spanish Ulcer: A History of the Peninsular War. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-81083-1.
- Gates, David (2003). The Napoleonic Wars, 1803–1815. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-0719-3.
- Gill, John H. (2014). 1809: Thunder on the Danube – Napoleon’s Defeat of the Habsburgs, Vol. 1. London: Frontline Books. ISBN 978-184415-713-6.
- Glover, Richard (1967). «The French Fleet, 1807–1814; Britain’s Problem; and Madison’s Opportunity». The Journal of Modern History. 39 (3): 233–52. doi:10.1086/240080. S2CID 143376566.
- Godechot, Jacques; et al. (1971). The Napoleonic era in Europe. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN 978-0-03-084166-8.
- Grab, Alexander (2003). Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-68275-3.
- Hall, Stephen (2006). Size Matters. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-618-47040-2.
- Harvey, Robert (2006). The War of Wars. Robinson. ISBN 978-1-84529-635-3.
- Hindmarsh, J. Thomas; Savory, John (2008). «The Death of Napoleon, Cancer or Arsenic?». Clinical Chemistry. 54 (12): 2092. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.117358. Archived from the original on 26 December 2010. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
- Karsh, Inari (2001). Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East, 1789–1923. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-00541-9.
- Mowat, R.B. (1924) The Diplomacy of Napoleon (1924) 350 pp. online
- O’Connor, J; Robertson, E F (2003). «The history of measurement». St Andrew’s University. Retrieved 18 July 2008.
- Poulos, Anthi (2000). «1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict». International Journal of Legal Information (vol 28 ed.). 28: 1–44. doi:10.1017/S0731126500008842. S2CID 159202400.
- Richardson, Hubert N.B. A Dictionary of Napoleon and His Times (1921) online free 489pp
- Roberts, Chris (2004). Heavy Words Lightly Thrown. Granta. ISBN 978-1-86207-765-2.
- Schom, Alan (1997). Napoleon Bonaparte. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-017214-5.
- Schroeder, Paul W. (1996). The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848. Oxford U.P. pp. 177–560. ISBN 978-0-19-820654-5. advanced diplomatic history of Napoleon and his era
- Schwarzfuchs, Simon (1979). Napoleon, the Jews and the Sanhedrin. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-19-710023-3.
- Watson, William (2003). Tricolor and crescent. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-275-97470-1. Retrieved 12 June 2009.
- Sicker, Martin (2001). The Islamic World in Decline: From the Treaty of Karlowitz to the Disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. Greenwood. p. 99. ISBN 978-0-275-96891-5.
- Wells, David (1992). The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-011813-1.
External links
- The Napoleonic Guide
- Napoleon Series
- International Napoleonic Society
- Biography by the US Public Broadcasting Service
- Works by Napoleon at Project Gutenberg
- Hit the road with Napoleon
- Rose, John Holland (1911). «Napoleon I.» . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 19 (11th ed.). pp. 190–211.
Всего найдено: 20
Добрый день! Как правильно написать бандеры и шухевичи – с прописной (мы все глядим в Наполеоны) или строчной? Спасибо.
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Собственные имена исторических лиц, литературных или мифологических персонажей, употребляясь обобщенно (переносно) как названия людей с определенными чертами характера и поведения, пишутся неединообразно — одни со строчной, другие с прописной буквы. Для приведенных Вами слов пока не зафиксировано нормативное написание, что позволяет их писать и со строчной, и с прописной.
…. и многочисленная наполеоновская армия не смогла оказать сопротивлени (Е,Я). Ученик написал «Е», учитель исправил на «Я», как правильно?
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Можно было не исправлять, ошибки здесь нет, возможны оба варианта: не смогла оказать сопротивление и не смогла оказать сопротивления. В конструкциях «не + спрягаемая форма глагола + инфинитив + существительное» существительное, зависимое от инфинитива, может стоять как в форме винительного падежа, так и в форме родительного падежа. См.: Граудина Л. К., Ицкович В. А., Катлинская Л. П. Словарь грамматических вариантов русского языка. – 3-е изд., стер. М., 2008.
здравствуйте. подскажите, пожалуйста, должно ли кавычиться и писаться с большой буквы другое название Июльской революции 1830 года — Три славных дня?
большое спасибо!
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Словарной фиксации нет. Можно написать «Три славных дня» или Три славных дня (аналогия: наполеоновские «Сто дней» / Сто дней – в разных словарях это сочетание фиксируется с кавычками и без кавычек).
Какой частью речи является слово прямо в предложении: у него планы прямо наполеоновские?
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Здесь прямо – частица.
Добрый день! Не подскажете ли, как пишется слово «первопрестольная» — с заглавной буквы или маленькой (если понятно, что речь о Москве). Например, в таком вот предложении: «Часто приезжие становятся жертвами и собственных иллюзий, а их ожидания и наполеоновские планы по покорению первопрестольной разбиваются о суровую реальность». Спасибо заранее.
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Слово Первопрестольная (о Москве) пишется с большой буквы.
Уважаемая Грамота,
Употребимо ли (в письменном, разговорном, просторечном…) слово «где» в придаточных предложениях времени? Например: «Вернёмся в 1812 год, где Наполеон строил свои планы по захвату столицы.»
Спасибо!
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Такое употребление некорректно. Верно: …в 1812 год, когда…
Здравствуйте!
Будьте добры, подскажите, как пишутся следующие исторические понятия:
З/земли Ч/чешской короны, европейский концерт — со строчной буквы? в кавычках? и ось Берлин-Рим-Токио — в кавычках? «ось» со строчной?
Огромное спасибо!
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Корректно: земли чешской короны, «европейский концерт» (после Наполеоновских войн), ось Берлин – Рим – Токио (между названиями – тире).
Скажите пожалуйста название пирожного «эклер», подобно «наполеону» , произошло от имени собственного ?
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Экле́р — от фр. éclair — молния.
Здравствуйте. Склоняется ли фамилия Бонапарт в этом предложении: Он знал братьев Бонапарт — Жозефа и Наполеона. Спасибо.
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Верно: братьев Бонапартов.
«На сцене появились какие-то маленькие шаляпины». Правильно ли, что в этом предложении имя собственное стало именем нарицательным и написано с маленькой буквы?
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Правильно с прописной: маленькие Шаляпины. Только некоторые собственные имена лиц, литературных или мифологических персонажей, употребляясь обобщенно (переносно), пишутся со строчной буквы; написание таких слов определяется в словарном порядке: иуда, робинзон, меценат, донжуан и др. В большинстве случаев употребление собственных имен в нарицательном смысле не требует замены прописной буквы на строчную, ср.: мы все глядим в Наполеоны (Пушкин).
Как правильно: Наполеон Бонапарт или Буонапарт
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Правильно: Бонапарт.
Добрый день! Скажите, пожалуйста, поиск по слову или фразе отключен? В любом случае ответьте, как писать: торт «наполеон«, торт «Наполеон«, просто наполеон?
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Поиск по тексту вопроса / ответа находится в стадии доработки.
Правильно: торт «Наполеон».
Здравствуйте! К вопросу № 232061
Правильно: господство Гитлеров и Черчиллей.
Поясните почему, пожалуйста. Вроде как здесь имеются в виду не собственные имена а нарицательные понятия.Спасибо
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Лишь некоторые имена собственные при употреблении в нарицательном смысле меняют прописную букву на строчную, например: _меценат, иуда, геркулес, цербер, робинзон_ и др. Их написание устанавливается в словарном порядке. Большинство же собственных имен сохраняют прописную букву и при переносном (обобщенном)употреблении, ср.: _Мы все глядим в Наполеоны_.
«…Письмо Наполеона к королю Прусскому» — не нужно ли сделать «Прусскому» с маленькой буквы?
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Верно написание с маленькой буквы.
Пожалуйста, ответьте срочно — сдаем номер.
В титуле «Первый консул Республики» слово «первый» должно писаться с прописной или строчной буквы? (Речь идет о Наполеоне.)
Спасибо.
Ответ справочной службы русского языка
Слово _первый_ пишется с маленькой буквы.
Леонид сожалеет.
Это незавершённая статья. Ей существенно не хватает текста, изображений и ссылок.
Вы можете помочь ВикиВоинам, дополнив или исправив статью.
“ | ” |
Наполеон I Бонапарт — император французов в 1804 — 1815 годах, великий полководец и государственный деятель, заложивший основы современного французского государства.
Наполеоне Буонапарте (так его имя произносилось на Корсике) свою профессиональную военную службу начал в 1785 году в чине младшего лейтенанта артиллерии; выдвинулся в период Великой французской революции, достигнув чина бригадного генерала (после взятия Тулона 18 декабря 1793 года). При Директории добился чина дивизионного генерала и должности командующего военными силами тыла (после разгрома мятежа 13 вандемьера 1795 года), а затем должности командующего Итальянской армией (назначен 2 марта 1796 года). В 1798—1799 годах возглавлял военную экспедицию в Египет.
В ноябре 1799 года совершил государственный переворот (18 брюмера), в результате которого стал первым консулом, фактически сосредоточив тем самым в своих руках всю полноту власти. Установил диктаторский режим. Провёл ряд реформ (основание Французского банка (1800), принятие гражданского кодекса (1804) и другие).
18 мая 1804 года был провозглашён императором. Победоносные наполеоновские войны, особенно австрийская кампания 1805 года, прусская и польская кампании 1806—1807 годов, австрийская кампания 1809 года способствовали превращению Франции в главную державу на континенте. Однако неудачное соперничество Наполеона с «владычицей морей» Великобританией не позволяло этому статусу полностью закрепиться.
Поражение Великой армии в войне 1812 года против России положило начало крушению империи Наполеона I. После «битвы народов» под Лейпцигом Наполеон уже не мог противостоять объединенной армии антифранцузской коалиции. Вступление в 1814 году войск коалиции в Париж вынудило Наполеона I отречься от престола (6 апреля). Он был сослан на остров Эльба.
Вновь занял французский престол в марте 1815 года (Сто дней). После поражения при Ватерлоо вторично отрёкся от престола (22 июня 1815).
Последние годы жизни провёл на острове Святой Елены пленником англичан. Его прах с 1840 года находится в Доме инвалидов в Париже.
Галерея[править]
-
-
Оловянный бюст Наполеона в кирасе, 1807 г.
-
Оловянный бюст Наполеона в кирасе, 1807 г.
-
Кираса и каска Наполеона, 1807 г.
-
Другой кирасы кирасы Наполеона.
В культуре[править]
Другое[править]
- В рамках интернет-проекта «Эпичные рэп-битвы истории» вышел выпуск, в котором Наполеон Бонапарт сошелся в рэп-баттле с персонажем американского фильма Наполеоном Динамитом.
Интересные факты[править]
- Наполеон менял свою знаменитую треуголку примерно раз в месяц, что за время его правления составило примерно 170 шляп. На сегодняшний день сохранилось около 20 шляп Наполеона, 6 из них хранятся в парижском Музее армии.
- После сражения при Эйлау Наполеон настолько был поражен уровнем потерь, что даже решил всех генералов и штаб-офицеров одеть в кирасы. Для вдохновения других, Наполеон сам заказал себе такой доспех и появился в нем в Тильзите в июне 1807 г. Когда Наполеон показался перед своими офицерами в кирасе, его встретил взрыв хохота, после чего от этой идеи пришлось отказаться.
- С 1800 г. на разных европейских языках появлялось немало предсказаний и пророчества касательно личности Наполеона, но самыми необычными были брошюры, опровергающие сам факт существования Наполеона. Например, английский епископ Уэтли «блестящим и неопровержимым образом показал все черты солнечного бога в знаменитом мифическом герое, называющемся Наполеоном, как он поднимается в своей славе с востока (Египетская экспедиция), как окруженный своими 12 маршалами (знаки зодиака), он озаряет весь мир блеском своих подвигов, как затем он побеждается враждебной силой стужи (зимнее солнце) и как, наконец, исчезает в волнах океана на западном горизонте (заходящее солнце)». В 1827 г. во Франции была опубликована брошюра профессора математики и физики из Леона Ж. Б. Переса «Почему Наполеона никогда не существовало», в которой ученный, из-за спора с учеником, попытался доказать немыслимую вещь — опровергнуть существование Наполеона Бонапарта. Не смотря на то, что некоторые дилетанты используют данный источник для постройки различных псевдоисторчиеских теорий, на самом деле целью работы Ж. Б. Переса было доведение солярного мифа происхождения Наполеона до абсурда, научная критика и яркая демонстрация несостоятельности методов мифологической школы историков. Так, Перес пытался доказать, что у Наполеона много общего с мифологическим героем Аполлоном, в том числе имена, имена матерей, количество братьев (четыре — символ времен года), два брака и ребенок только от второго брака (здесь проводятся параллели с египетской мифологией) и т. д.
- Артур Конан Дойл, видимо, очень любил Наполеона, поскольку написал рассказ «Шесть Наполеонов» о бюстах великого французского императора, а гениального злодея профессора Мориарти называл «наполеоном криминального мира».
Napoleon | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries, by Jacques-Louis David, 1812 |
||||
Emperor of the French
(more…) |
||||
1st reign | 18 May 1804 – 6 April 1814 | |||
Coronation | 2 December 1804 Notre-Dame Cathedral |
|||
Successor | Louis XVIII (as King of France) |
|||
2nd reign | 20 March 1815 – 22 June 1815 | |||
Predecessor | Louis XVIII | |||
Successor | Napoleon II (disputed) or Louis XVIII | |||
King of Italy | ||||
Reign | 17 March 1805 – 11 April 1814 | |||
Coronation | 26 May 1805 Milan Cathedral |
|||
First Consul of France | ||||
In office 12 December 1799 – 18 May 1804 |
||||
Co-Consuls | Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès Charles-François Lebrun |
|||
Provisional Consul of France | ||||
In office 10 November 1799 – 12 December 1799 |
||||
Co-Consuls | Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès Roger Ducos |
|||
President of the Italian Republic | ||||
In office 26 January 1802 – 17 March 1805 |
||||
Vice President | Francesco Melzi d’Eril | |||
Protector of the Confederation of the Rhine | ||||
In office 12 July 1806 – 4 November 1813 |
||||
Prince-Primates | Karl von Dalberg Eugène de Beauharnais |
|||
Born | Napoleone Buonaparte[1] 15 August 1769 Ajaccio, Corsica, Kingdom of France |
|||
Died | 5 May 1821 (aged 51) Longwood, Saint Helena, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland |
|||
Burial | 15 December 1840
Les Invalides, Paris, France |
|||
Spouse |
Joséphine de Beauharnais (m. ; div. ) Marie Louise of Austria (m. ; separated 1814) |
|||
Issue Detail |
|
|||
|
||||
House | Bonaparte | |||
Father | Carlo Buonaparte | |||
Mother | Letizia Ramolino | |||
Signature |
Rescale the fullscreen map to see Saint Helena
Napoleon Bonaparte[a] (born Napoleone Buonaparte; 15 August 1769 – 5 May 1821), later known by his regnal name Napoleon I,[b] was a French military commander and political leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and led successful campaigns during the Revolutionary Wars. He was the de facto leader of the French Republic as First Consul from 1799 to 1804, then Emperor of the French from 1804 until 1814 and again in 1815. Napoleon’s political and cultural legacy endures to this day, as a highly celebrated and controversial leader. He initiated many liberal reforms that have persisted in society, and is considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His wars and campaigns are studied by militaries all over the world. Between three and six million civilians and soldiers perished in what became known as the Napoleonic Wars.[2][3]
Napoleon was born on the island of Corsica, not long after its annexation by France, to a native family descending from minor Italian nobility.[4][5] He supported the French Revolution in 1789 while serving in the French army, and tried to spread its ideals to his native Corsica. He rose rapidly in the Army after he saved the governing French Directory by firing on royalist insurgents. In 1796, he began a military campaign against the Austrians and their Italian allies, scoring decisive victories and becoming a national hero. Two years later, he led a military expedition to Egypt that served as a springboard to political power. He engineered a coup in November 1799 and became First Consul of the Republic.
Differences with the United Kingdom meant France faced the War of the Third Coalition by 1805. Napoleon shattered this coalition with victories in the Ulm campaign, and at the Battle of Austerlitz, which led to the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. In 1806, the Fourth Coalition took up arms against him. Napoleon defeated Prussia at the battles of Jena and Auerstedt, marched the Grande Armée into Eastern Europe, and defeated the Russians in June 1807 at Friedland, forcing the defeated nations of the Fourth Coalition to accept the Treaties of Tilsit. Two years later, the Austrians challenged the French again during the War of the Fifth Coalition, but Napoleon solidified his grip over Europe after triumphing at the Battle of Wagram.
Hoping to extend the Continental System, his embargo against Britain, Napoleon invaded the Iberian Peninsula and declared his brother Joseph the King of Spain in 1808. The Spanish and the Portuguese revolted in the Peninsular War aided by a British army, culminating in defeat for Napoleon’s marshals. Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia in the summer of 1812. The resulting campaign witnessed the catastrophic retreat of Napoleon’s Grande Armée. In 1813, Prussia and Austria joined Russian forces in a Sixth Coalition against France, resulting in a large coalition army defeating Napoleon at the Battle of Leipzig. The coalition invaded France and captured Paris, forcing Napoleon to abdicate in April 1814. He was exiled to the island of Elba, between Corsica and Italy. In France, the Bourbons were restored to power.
Napoleon escaped in February 1815 and took control of France.[6] The Allies responded by forming a Seventh Coalition, which defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. The British exiled him to the remote island of Saint Helena in the Atlantic, where he died in 1821 at the age of 51.
Napoleon had an extensive impact on the modern world, bringing liberal reforms to the lands he conquered, especially the regions of the Low Countries, Switzerland and parts of modern Italy and Germany. He implemented many liberal policies in France and Western Europe.[c] British historian Andrew Roberts summarizes these ideas as follows:
The ideas that underpin our modern world—meritocracy, equality before the law, property rights, religious toleration, modern secular education, sound finances, and so on—were championed, consolidated, codified and geographically extended by Napoleon. To them he added a rational and efficient local administration, an end to rural banditry, the encouragement of science and the arts, the abolition of feudalism and the greatest codification of laws since the fall of the Roman Empire.[13]
Early life
Napoleon’s family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family who emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a minor Genoese noble family.[14] The Buonapartes were also the relatives, by marriage and by birth, of the Pietrasentas, Costas, Paraviccinis, and Bonellis, all Corsican families of the interior.[15] His parents Carlo Maria di Buonaparte and Maria Letizia Ramolino maintained an ancestral home called «Casa Buonaparte» in Ajaccio. Napoleon was born there on 15 August 1769. He was the fourth child and third son of the family.[d] He had an elder brother, Joseph, and younger siblings Lucien, Elisa, Louis, Pauline, Caroline, and Jérôme. Napoleon was baptised as a Catholic, under the name Napoleone.[16] In his youth, his name was also spelled as Nabulione, Nabulio, Napolionne, and Napulione.[17]
Napoleon was born in the same year that the Republic of Genoa (former Italian state) ceded the region of Corsica to France.[18] The state sold sovereign rights a year before his birth and the island was conquered by France during the year of his birth. It was formally incorporated as a province in 1770, after 500 years under Genoese rule and 14 years of independence.[e] Napoleon’s parents joined the Corsican resistance and fought against the French to maintain independence, even when Maria was pregnant with him. His father Carlo was an attorney who had supported and actively collaborated with patriot Pasquale Paoli during the Corsican war of independence against France;[5] after the Corsican defeat at Ponte Novu in 1769 and Paoli’s exile in Britain, Carlo began working for the new French government and went on to be named representative of the island to the court of Louis XVI in 1777.[5][22]
The dominant influence of Napoleon’s childhood was his mother, whose firm discipline restrained a rambunctious child.[22] Later in life, Napoleon stated, «The future destiny of the child is always the work of the mother.»[23] Napoleon’s maternal grandmother had married into the Swiss Fesch family in her second marriage, and Napoleon’s uncle, the cardinal Joseph Fesch, would fulfill a role as protector of the Bonaparte family for some years. Napoleon’s noble, moderately affluent background afforded him greater opportunities to study than were available to a typical Corsican of the time.[24]
Statue of Napoleon as a schoolboy in Brienne, aged 15, by Louis Rochet [fr] (1853)
When he turned 9 years old,[25][26] he moved to the French mainland and enrolled at a religious school in Autun in January 1779. In May, he transferred with a scholarship to a military academy at Brienne-le-Château.[27] In his youth he was an outspoken Corsican nationalist and supported the state’s independence from France.[25][28] Like many Corsicans, Napoleon spoke and read Corsican (as his mother tongue) and Italian (as the official language of Corsica).[29][30][31][28] He began learning French in school at around age 10.[32] Although he became fluent in French, he spoke with a distinctive Corsican accent and never learned how to spell correctly in French.[33] Consequently, Napoleon was treated unfairly by his schoolmates.[28] He was, however, not an isolated case, as it was estimated in 1790 that fewer than 3 million people, out of France’s population of 28 million, were able to speak standard French, and those who could write it were even fewer.[34]
Napoleon was routinely bullied by his peers for his accent, birthplace, short stature, mannerisms and inability to speak French quickly.[30] He became reserved and melancholy, applying himself to reading. An examiner observed that Napoleon «has always been distinguished for his application in mathematics. He is fairly well acquainted with history and geography … This boy would make an excellent sailor».[f][36]
One story told of Napoleon at the school is that he led junior students to victory against senior students in a snowball fight, showing his leadership abilities.[37] In early adulthood, Napoleon briefly intended to become a writer; he authored a history of Corsica and a romantic novella.[25]
On completion of his studies at Brienne in 1784, Napoleon was admitted to the École Militaire in Paris. He trained to become an artillery officer and, when his father’s death reduced his income, was forced to complete the two-year course in one year.[38] He was the first Corsican to graduate from the École Militaire.[38] He was examined by the famed scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace.[39]
Early career
Upon graduating in September 1785, Bonaparte was commissioned a second lieutenant in La Fère artillery regiment.[g][27] He served in Valence and Auxonne until after the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789. Bonaparte was a fervent Corsican nationalist during this period.[41] He asked for leave to join his mentor Pasquale Paoli, when Paoli was allowed to return to Corsica by the National Assembly. Paoli had no sympathy for Napoleon, however, as he deemed his father a traitor for having deserted his cause for Corsican independence.[42]
He spent the early years of the Revolution in Corsica, fighting in a complex three-way struggle among royalists, revolutionaries, and Corsican nationalists. Napoleon came to embrace the ideals of the Revolution, becoming a supporter of the Jacobins and joining the pro-French Corsican Republicans who opposed Paoli’s policy and his aspirations of secession.[43] He was given command over a battalion of volunteers and was promoted to captain in the regular army in July 1792, despite exceeding his leave of absence and leading a riot against French troops.[44]
When Corsica declared formal secession from France and requested the protection of the British government, Napoleon and his commitment to the French Revolution came into conflict with Paoli, who had decided to sabotage the Corsican contribution to the Expédition de Sardaigne, by preventing a French assault on the Sardinian island of La Maddalena.[45] Bonaparte and his family were compelled to flee to Toulon on the French mainland in June 1793 because of the split with Paoli.[46]
Although he was born «Napoleone Buonaparte», it was after this that Napoleon began styling himself «Napoléon Bonaparte». His family did not drop the name Buonaparte until 1796. The first known record of him signing his name as Bonaparte was at the age of 27 (in 1796).[47][16][48]
Siege of Toulon
In July 1793, Bonaparte published a pro-republican pamphlet entitled Le souper de Beaucaire (Supper at Beaucaire) which gained him the support of Augustin Robespierre, the younger brother of the Revolutionary leader Maximilien Robespierre. With the help of his fellow Corsican Antoine Christophe Saliceti, Bonaparte was appointed senior gunner and artillery commander of the republican forces which arrived on 8 September at Toulon.[49][50]
He adopted a plan to capture a hill where republican guns could dominate the city’s harbour and force the British to evacuate. The assault on the position led to the capture of the city, and during it Bonaparte was wounded in the thigh on 16 December. Catching the attention of the Committee of Public Safety, he was put in charge of the artillery of France’s Army of Italy.[51] On 22 December he was on his way to his new post in Nice, promoted from the rank of colonel to brigadier general at the age of 24. He devised plans for attacking the Kingdom of Sardinia as part of France’s campaign against the First Coalition.
The French army carried out Bonaparte’s plan in the Battle of Saorgio in April 1794, and then advanced to seize Ormea in the mountains. From Ormea, they headed west to outflank the Austro-Sardinian positions around Saorge. After this campaign, Augustin Robespierre sent Bonaparte on a mission to the Republic of Genoa to determine that country’s intentions towards France.[52]
13 Vendémiaire
Some contemporaries alleged that Bonaparte was put under house arrest at Nice for his association with the Robespierres following their fall in the Thermidorian Reaction in July 1794. Napoleon’s secretary Bourrienne disputed the allegation in his memoirs. According to Bourrienne, jealousy was responsible, between the Army of the Alps and the Army of Italy, with whom Napoleon was seconded at the time.[53] Bonaparte dispatched an impassioned defence in a letter to the commissar Saliceti, and he was acquitted of any wrongdoing.[54] He was released within two weeks (on 20 August) and due to his technical skills, was asked to draw up plans to attack Italian positions in the context of France’s war with Austria. He also took part in an expedition to take back Corsica from the British, but the French were repulsed by the British Royal Navy.[55]
By 1795, Bonaparte had become engaged to Désirée Clary, daughter of François Clary. Désirée’s sister Julie Clary had married Bonaparte’s elder brother Joseph.[56] In April 1795, he was assigned to the Army of the West, which was engaged in the War in the Vendée—a civil war and royalist counter-revolution in Vendée, a region in west-central France on the Atlantic Ocean. As an infantry command, it was a demotion from artillery general—for which the army already had a full quota—and he pleaded poor health to avoid the posting.[57]
He was moved to the Bureau of Topography of the Committee of Public Safety. He sought unsuccessfully to be transferred to Constantinople in order to offer his services to the Sultan.[58] During this period, he wrote the romantic novella Clisson et Eugénie, about a soldier and his lover, in a clear parallel to Bonaparte’s own relationship with Désirée.[59] On 15 September, Bonaparte was removed from the list of generals in regular service for his refusal to serve in the Vendée campaign. He faced a difficult financial situation and reduced career prospects.[60]
On 3 October, royalists in Paris declared a rebellion against the National Convention.[61] Paul Barras, a leader of the Thermidorian Reaction, knew of Bonaparte’s military exploits at Toulon and gave him command of the improvised forces in defence of the convention in the Tuileries Palace. Napoleon had seen the massacre of the King’s Swiss Guard there three years earlier and realized that artillery would be the key to its defence.[27]
He ordered a young cavalry officer named Joachim Murat to seize large cannons and used them to repel the attackers on 5 October 1795—13 Vendémiaire An IV in the French Republican Calendar. 1,400 royalists died and the rest fled.[61] He cleared the streets with «a whiff of grapeshot», according to 19th-century historian Thomas Carlyle in The French Revolution: A History.[62][63]
The defeat of the royalist insurrection extinguished the threat to the Convention and earned Bonaparte sudden fame, wealth, and the patronage of the new government, the Directory. Murat married one of Napoleon’s sisters, becoming his brother-in-law; he also served under Napoleon as one of his generals. Bonaparte was promoted to Commander of the Interior and given command of the Army of Italy.[46]
Within weeks, he was romantically involved with Joséphine de Beauharnais, the former mistress of Barras. The couple married on 9 March 1796 in a civil ceremony.[64]
First Italian campaign
Two days after the marriage, Bonaparte left Paris to take command of the Army of Italy. He immediately went on the offensive, hoping to defeat the forces of Piedmont before their Austrian allies could intervene. In a series of rapid victories during the Montenotte Campaign, he knocked Piedmont out of the war in two weeks. The French then focused on the Austrians for the remainder of the war, the highlight of which became the protracted struggle for Mantua. The Austrians launched a series of offensives against the French to break the siege, but Napoleon defeated every relief effort, scoring victories at the battles of Castiglione, Bassano, Arcole, and Rivoli. The decisive French triumph at Rivoli in January 1797 led to the collapse of the Austrian position in Italy. At Rivoli, the Austrians lost up to 14,000 men while the French lost about 5,000.[65]
The next phase of the campaign featured the French invasion of the Habsburg heartlands. French forces in Southern Germany had been defeated by the Archduke Charles in 1796, but the Archduke withdrew his forces to protect Vienna after learning about Napoleon’s assault. In the first encounter between the two commanders, Napoleon pushed back his opponent and advanced deep into Austrian territory after winning at the Battle of Tarvis in March 1797. The Austrians were alarmed by the French thrust that reached all the way to Leoben, about 100 km from Vienna, and decided to sue for peace.[66]
The Treaty of Leoben, followed by the more comprehensive Treaty of Campo Formio, gave France control of most of northern Italy and the Low Countries, and a secret clause promised the Republic of Venice to Austria. Bonaparte marched on Venice and forced its surrender, ending 1,100 years of Venetian independence. He authorized the French to loot treasures such as the Horses of Saint Mark.[67]
On the journey, Bonaparte conversed much about the warriors of antiquity, especially Alexander, Caesar, Scipio and Hannibal. He studied their strategy and combined it with his own. In a question from Bourrienne, asking whether he gave his preference to Alexander or Caesar, Napoleon said that he places Alexander the Great in the first rank, the main reason being his campaign in Asia.[68]
Bonaparte during the Italian campaign in 1797
His application of conventional military ideas to real-world situations enabled his military triumphs, such as creative use of artillery as a mobile force to support his infantry. He stated later in life:[when?] «I have fought sixty battles and I have learned nothing which I did not know at the beginning. Look at Caesar; he fought the first like the last».[69]
Bonaparte could win battles by concealment of troop deployments and concentration of his forces on the «hinge» of an enemy’s weakened front. If he could not use his favourite envelopment strategy, he would take up the central position and attack two co-operating forces at their hinge, swing round to fight one until it fled, then turn to face the other.[70] In this Italian campaign, Bonaparte’s army captured 150,000 prisoners, 540 cannons, and 170 standards.[71] The French army fought 67 actions and won 18 pitched battles through superior artillery technology and Bonaparte’s tactics.[72]
During the campaign, Bonaparte became increasingly influential in French politics. He founded two newspapers: one for the troops in his army and another for circulation in France.[73] The royalists attacked Bonaparte for looting Italy and warned that he might become a dictator.[74] Napoleon’s forces extracted an estimated $45 million in funds from Italy during their campaign there, another $12 million in precious metals and jewels. His forces confiscated more than 300 priceless paintings and sculptures.[75]
Bonaparte sent General Pierre Augereau to Paris to lead a coup d’état and purge the royalists on 4 September—the Coup of 18 Fructidor. This left Barras and his Republican allies in control again but dependent upon Bonaparte, who proceeded to peace negotiations with Austria. These negotiations resulted in the Treaty of Campo Formio. Bonaparte returned to Paris in December 1797 as a hero.[76] He met Talleyrand, France’s new Foreign Minister—who served in the same capacity for Emperor Napoleon—and they began to prepare for an invasion of Britain.[46]
Egyptian expedition
After two months of planning, Bonaparte decided that France’s naval strength was not yet sufficient to confront the British Royal Navy. He decided on a military expedition to seize Egypt and thereby undermine Britain’s access to its trade interests in India.[46] Bonaparte wished to establish a French presence in the Middle East and join forces with Tipu Sultan, the Sultan of Mysore who was an enemy of the British.[77] Napoleon assured the Directory that «as soon as he had conquered Egypt, he will establish relations with the Indian princes and, together with them, attack the English in their possessions».[78] The Directory agreed in order to secure a trade route to the Indian subcontinent.[79]
In May 1798, Bonaparte was elected a member of the French Academy of Sciences. His Egyptian expedition included a group of 167 scientists, with mathematicians, naturalists, chemists, and geodesists among them. Their discoveries included the Rosetta Stone, and their work was published in the Description de l’Égypte in 1809.[80]
En route to Egypt, Bonaparte reached Malta on 9 June 1798, then controlled by the Knights Hospitaller. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch zu Bolheim surrendered after token resistance, and Bonaparte captured an important naval base with the loss of only three men.[81]
Bonaparte and his expedition eluded pursuit by the Royal Navy and landed at Alexandria on 1 July.[46] He fought the Battle of Shubra Khit against the Mamluks, Egypt’s ruling military caste. This helped the French practise their defensive tactic for the Battle of the Pyramids, fought on 21 July, about 24 km (15 mi) from the pyramids. General Bonaparte’s forces of 25,000 roughly equalled those of the Mamluks’ Egyptian cavalry. Twenty-nine French[82] and approximately 2,000 Egyptians were killed. The victory boosted the morale of the French army.[83]
On 1 August 1798, the British fleet under Sir Horatio Nelson captured or destroyed all but two vessels of the French fleet in the Battle of the Nile, defeating Bonaparte’s goal to strengthen the French position in the Mediterranean.[84] His army had succeeded in a temporary increase of French power in Egypt, though it faced repeated uprisings.[85] In early 1799, he moved an army into the Ottoman province of Damascus (Syria and Galilee). Bonaparte led these 13,000 French soldiers in the conquest of the coastal towns of Arish, Gaza, Jaffa, and Haifa.[86] The attack on Jaffa was particularly brutal. Bonaparte discovered that many of the defenders were former prisoners of war, ostensibly on parole, so he ordered the garrison and some 1,500–2,000 prisoners to be executed by bayonet or drowning.[87] Men, women, and children were robbed and murdered for three days.[88]
Bonaparte began with an army of 13,000 men. 1,500 were reported missing, 1,200 died in combat, and thousands perished from disease—mostly bubonic plague. He failed to reduce the fortress of Acre, so he marched his army back to Egypt in May. To speed up the retreat, Bonaparte ordered plague-stricken men to be poisoned with opium. The number who died remains disputed, ranging from a low of 30 to a high of 580. He also brought out 1,000 wounded men.[89] Back in Egypt on 25 July, Bonaparte defeated an Ottoman amphibious invasion at Abukir.[90]
Ruler of France
General Bonaparte surrounded by members of the Council of Five Hundred during the Coup of 18 Brumaire, by François Bouchot
While in Egypt, Bonaparte stayed informed of European affairs. He learned that France had suffered a series of defeats in the War of the Second Coalition.[91] On 24 August 1799, fearing that the Republic’s future was in doubt, he took advantage of the temporary departure of British ships from French coastal ports and set sail for France, despite the fact that he had received no explicit orders from Paris.[92] The army was left in the charge of Jean-Baptiste Kléber.[93]
Unknown to Bonaparte, the Directory had sent him orders to return to ward off possible invasions of French soil, but poor lines of communication prevented the delivery of these messages.[91] By the time that he reached Paris in October, France’s situation had been improved by a series of victories. The Republic, however, was bankrupt and the ineffective Directory was unpopular with the French population.[94] The Directory discussed Bonaparte’s «desertion» but was too weak to punish him.[91]
Despite the failures in Egypt, Napoleon returned to a hero’s welcome. He drew together an alliance with director Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, his brother Lucien, speaker of the Council of Five Hundred Roger Ducos, director Joseph Fouché, and Talleyrand, and they overthrew the Directory by a coup d’état on 9 November 1799 («the 18th Brumaire» according to the revolutionary calendar), closing down the Council of Five Hundred. Napoleon became «first consul» for ten years, with two consuls appointed by him who had consultative voices only. His power was confirmed by the new «Constitution of the Year VIII», originally devised by Sieyès to give Napoleon a minor role, but rewritten by Napoleon, and accepted by direct popular vote (3,000,000 in favour, 1,567 opposed). The constitution preserved the appearance of a republic but, in reality, established a dictatorship.[95][96]
French Consulate
Napoleon established a political system that historian Martyn Lyons called «dictatorship by plebiscite».[97] Worried by the democratic forces unleashed by the Revolution, but unwilling to ignore them entirely, Napoleon resorted to regular electoral consultations with the French people on his road to imperial power.[97] He drafted the Constitution of the Year VIII and secured his own election as First Consul, taking up residence at the Tuileries. The constitution was approved in a rigged plebiscite held the following January, with 99.94 percent officially listed as voting «yes».[98]
Napoleon’s brother, Lucien, had falsified the returns to show that 3 million people had participated in the plebiscite. The real number was 1.5 million.[97] Political observers at the time assumed the eligible French voting public numbered about 5 million people, so the regime artificially doubled the participation rate to indicate popular enthusiasm for the consulate.[97] In the first few months of the consulate, with war in Europe still raging and internal instability still plaguing the country, Napoleon’s grip on power remained very tenuous.[99]
In the spring of 1800, Napoleon and his troops crossed the Swiss Alps into Italy, aiming to surprise the Austrian armies that had reoccupied the peninsula when Napoleon was still in Egypt.[h] After a difficult crossing over the Alps, the French army entered the plains of Northern Italy virtually unopposed.[101] While one French army approached from the north, the Austrians were busy with another stationed in Genoa, which was besieged by a substantial force. The fierce resistance of this French army, under André Masséna, gave the northern force some time to carry out their operations with little interference.[102]
After spending several days looking for each other, the two armies collided at the Battle of Marengo on 14 June. General Melas had a numerical advantage, fielding about 30,000 Austrian soldiers while Napoleon commanded 24,000 French troops.[103] The battle began favourably for the Austrians as their initial attack surprised the French and gradually drove them back. Melas stated that he had won the battle and retired to his headquarters around 3 pm, leaving his subordinates in charge of pursuing the French.[104] The French lines never broke during their tactical retreat. Napoleon constantly rode out among the troops urging them to stand and fight.[105]
Late in the afternoon, a full division under Desaix arrived on the field and reversed the tide of the battle. A series of artillery barrages and cavalry charges decimated the Austrian army, which fled over the Bormida River back to Alessandria, leaving behind 14,000 casualties.[105] The following day, the Austrian army agreed to abandon Northern Italy once more with the Convention of Alessandria, which granted them safe passage to friendly soil in exchange for their fortresses throughout the region.[105]
Although critics have blamed Napoleon for several tactical mistakes preceding the battle, they have also praised his audacity for selecting a risky campaign strategy, choosing to invade the Italian peninsula from the north when the vast majority of French invasions came from the west, near or along the coastline.[106] As David G. Chandler points out, Napoleon spent almost a year getting the Austrians out of Italy in his first campaign. In 1800, it took him only a month to achieve the same goal.[106] German strategist and field marshal Alfred von Schlieffen concluded that «Bonaparte did not annihilate his enemy but eliminated him and rendered him harmless» while attaining «the object of the campaign: the conquest of North Italy».[107]
Napoleon’s triumph at Marengo secured his political authority and boosted his popularity back home, but it did not lead to an immediate peace. Bonaparte’s brother, Joseph, led the complex negotiations in Lunéville and reported that Austria, emboldened by British support, would not acknowledge the new territory that France had acquired. As negotiations became increasingly fractious, Bonaparte gave orders to his general Moreau to strike Austria once more. Moreau and the French swept through Bavaria and scored an overwhelming victory at Hohenlinden in December 1800. As a result, the Austrians capitulated and signed the Treaty of Lunéville in February 1801. The treaty reaffirmed and expanded earlier French gains at Campo Formio.[108]
Temporary peace in Europe
After a decade of constant warfare, France and Britain signed the Treaty of Amiens in March 1802, bringing the Revolutionary Wars to an end. Amiens called for the withdrawal of British troops from recently conquered colonial territories as well as for assurances to curtail the expansionary goals of the French Republic.[102] With Europe at peace and the economy recovering, Napoleon’s popularity soared to its highest levels under the consulate, both domestically and abroad.[109] In a new plebiscite during the spring of 1802, the French public came out in huge numbers to approve a constitution that made the Consulate permanent, essentially elevating Napoleon to dictator for life.[109]
Whereas the plebiscite two years earlier had brought out 1.5 million people to the polls, the new referendum enticed 3.6 million to go and vote (72 percent of all eligible voters).[110] There was no secret ballot in 1802 and few people wanted to openly defy the regime. The constitution gained approval with over 99% of the vote.[110] His broad powers were spelled out in the new constitution: Article 1. The French people name, and the Senate proclaims Napoleon-Bonaparte First Consul for Life.[111] After 1802, he was generally referred to as Napoleon rather than Bonaparte.[40]
The 1803 Louisiana Purchase totalled 2,144,480 square kilometres (827,987 square miles), doubling the size of the United States.
The brief peace in Europe allowed Napoleon to focus on French colonies abroad. Saint-Domingue had managed to acquire a high level of political autonomy during the Revolutionary Wars, with Toussaint L’Ouverture installing himself as de facto dictator by 1801. Napoleon saw a chance to reestablish control over the colony when he signed the Treaty of Amiens. In the 18th century, Saint-Domingue had been France’s most profitable colony, producing more sugar than all the British West Indies colonies combined. However, during the Revolution, the National Convention voted to abolish slavery in February 1794.[112] Aware of the expenses required to fund his wars in Europe, Napoleon made the decision to reinstate slavery in all French Caribbean colonies. The 1794 decree had only affected the colonies of Saint-Domingue, Guadeloupe and Guiana, and did not take effect in Mauritius, Reunion and Martinique, the last of which had been captured by the British and as such remained unaffected by French law.[113]
In Guadeloupe slavery had been abolished (and its ban violently enforced) by Victor Hugues against opposition from slaveholders thanks to the 1794 law. However, when slavery was reinstated in 1802, a slave revolt broke out under the leadership of Louis Delgrès.[114] The resulting Law of 20 May had the express purpose of reinstating slavery in Saint-Domingue, Guadeloupe and French Guiana, and restored slavery throughout most of the French colonial empire (excluding Saint-Domingue) for another half a century, while the French transatlantic slave trade continued for another twenty years.[115][116][117][118][119]
Napoleon sent an expedition under his brother-in-law General Leclerc to reassert control over Saint-Domingue. Although the French managed to capture Toussaint Louverture, the expedition failed when high rates of disease crippled the French army, and Jean-Jacques Dessalines won a string of victories, first against Leclerc, and when he died from yellow fever, then against Donatien-Marie-Joseph de Vimeur, vicomte de Rochambeau, whom Napoleon sent to relieve Leclerc with another 20,000 men. In May 1803, Napoleon acknowledged defeat, and the last 8,000 French troops left the island and the slaves proclaimed an independent republic that they called Haiti in 1804. In the process, Dessalines became arguably the most successful military commander in the struggle against Napoleonic France.[120][121] Seeing the failure of his efforts in Haiti, Napoleon decided in 1803 to sell the Louisiana Territory to the United States, instantly doubling the size of the U.S. The selling price in the Louisiana Purchase was less than three cents per acre, a total of $15 million.[2][122]
The peace with Britain proved to be uneasy and controversial.[123] Britain did not evacuate Malta as promised and protested against Bonaparte’s annexation of Piedmont and his Act of Mediation, which established a new Swiss Confederation. Neither of these territories were covered by Amiens, but they inflamed tensions significantly.[124] The dispute culminated in a declaration of war by Britain in May 1803; Napoleon responded by reassembling the invasion camp at Boulogne and declaring that every British male between eighteen and sixty years old in France and its dependencies to be arrested as a prisoner of war.[125]
French Empire
During the consulate, Napoleon faced several royalist and Jacobin assassination plots, including the Conspiration des poignards (Dagger plot) in October 1800 and the Plot of the Rue Saint-Nicaise (also known as the Infernal Machine) two months later.[126] In January 1804, his police uncovered an assassination plot against him that involved Moreau and which was ostensibly sponsored by the Bourbon family, the former rulers of France. On the advice of Talleyrand, Napoleon ordered the kidnapping of the Duke of Enghien, violating the sovereignty of Baden. The Duke was quickly executed after a secret military trial, even though he had not been involved in the plot.[127] Enghien’s execution infuriated royal courts throughout Europe, becoming one of the contributing political factors for the outbreak of the Napoleonic Wars.
To expand his power, Napoleon used these assassination plots to justify the creation of an imperial system based on the Roman model. He believed that a Bourbon restoration would be more difficult if his family’s succession was entrenched in the constitution.[128] Launching yet another referendum, Napoleon was elected as Emperor of the French by a tally exceeding 99%.[110] As with the Life Consulate two years earlier, this referendum produced heavy participation, bringing out almost 3.6 million voters to the polls.[110]
A keen observer of Bonaparte’s rise to absolute power, Madame de Rémusat, explains that «men worn out by the turmoil of the Revolution […] looked for the domination of an able ruler» and that «people believed quite sincerely that Bonaparte, whether as consul or emperor, would exert his authority and save [them] from the perils of anarchy.»[129]»
Napoleon’s throne room at Fontainebleau
Napoleon’s coronation, at which Pope Pius VII officiated, took place at Notre Dame de Paris, on 2 December 1804. Two separate crowns were brought for the ceremony: a golden laurel wreath recalling the Roman Empire, and a replica of Charlemagne’s crown.[130] Napoleon entered the ceremony wearing the laurel wreath and kept it on his head throughout the proceedings.[130] For the official coronation, he raised the Charlemagne crown over his own head in a symbolic gesture, but never placed it on top because he was already wearing the golden wreath.[130] Instead he placed the crown on Josephine’s head, the event commemorated in the officially sanctioned painting by Jacques-Louis David.[130] Napoleon was crowned King of Italy, with the Iron Crown of Lombardy, at the Cathedral of Milan on 26 May 1805. He created eighteen Marshals of the Empire from among his top generals to secure the allegiance of the army on 18 May 1804, the official start of the Empire.[131]
War of the Third Coalition
Great Britain had broken the Peace of Amiens by declaring war on France in May 1803.[132] In December 1804, an Anglo-Swedish agreement became the first step towards the creation of the Third Coalition. By April 1805, Britain had also signed an alliance with Russia.[133] Austria had been defeated by France twice in recent memory and wanted revenge, so it joined the coalition a few months later.[134]
Before the formation of the Third Coalition, Napoleon had assembled an invasion force, the Armée d’Angleterre, around six camps at Boulogne in Northern France. He intended to use this invasion force to strike at England. They never invaded, but Napoleon’s troops received careful and invaluable training for future military operations.[135] The men at Boulogne formed the core for what Napoleon later called La Grande Armée. At the start, this French army had about 200,000 men organized into seven corps, which were large field units that contained 36–40 cannons each and were capable of independent action until other corps could come to the rescue.[136]
A single corps properly situated in a strong defensive position could survive at least a day without support, giving the Grande Armée countless strategic and tactical options on every campaign. On top of these forces, Napoleon created a cavalry reserve of 22,000 organized into two cuirassier divisions, four mounted dragoon divisions, one division of dismounted dragoons, and one of light cavalry, all supported by 24 artillery pieces.[137] By 1805, the Grande Armée had grown to a force of 350,000 men,[137] who were well equipped, well trained, and led by competent officers.[138]
Napoleon knew that the French fleet could not defeat the Royal Navy in a head-to-head battle, so he planned to lure it away from the English Channel through diversionary tactics.[139] The main strategic idea involved the French Navy escaping from the British blockades of Toulon and Brest and threatening to attack the British West Indies. In the face of this attack, it was hoped, the British would weaken their defence of the Western Approaches by sending ships to the Caribbean, allowing a combined Franco-Spanish fleet to take control of the English channel long enough for French armies to cross and invade.[139] However, the plan unravelled after the British victory at the Battle of Cape Finisterre in July 1805. French Admiral Villeneuve then retreated to Cádiz instead of linking up with French naval forces at Brest for an attack on the English Channel.[140]
By August 1805, Napoleon had realized that the strategic situation had changed fundamentally. Facing a potential invasion from his continental enemies, he decided to strike first and turned his army’s sights from the English Channel to the Rhine. His basic objective was to destroy the isolated Austrian armies in Southern Germany before their Russian allies could arrive. On 25 September, after great secrecy and feverish marching, 200,000 French troops began to cross the Rhine on a front of 260 km (160 mi).[141][142]
Austrian commander Karl Mack had gathered the greater part of the Austrian army at the fortress of Ulm in Swabia. Napoleon swung his forces to the southeast and the Grande Armée performed an elaborate wheeling movement that outflanked the Austrian positions. The Ulm Maneuver completely surprised General Mack, who belatedly understood that his army had been cut off. After some minor engagements that culminated in the Battle of Ulm, Mack finally surrendered after realizing that there was no way to break out of the French encirclement. For just 2,000 French casualties, Napoleon had managed to capture a total of 60,000 Austrian soldiers through his army’s rapid marching.[143] Napoleon wrote after the conflict:
«I have accomplished my object, I have destroyed the Austrian army by simply marching.»[144]
The Ulm Campaign is generally regarded as a strategic masterpiece and was influential in the development of the Schlieffen Plan in the late 19th century.[145] For the French, this spectacular victory on land was soured by the decisive victory that the Royal Navy attained at the Battle of Trafalgar on 21 October. After Trafalgar, the Royal Navy was never again seriously challenged by a French fleet in a large-scale engagement for the duration of the Napoleonic Wars.[146]
Following the Ulm Campaign, French forces managed to capture Vienna in November. The fall of Vienna provided the French a huge bounty as they captured 100,000 muskets, 500 cannons, and the intact bridges across the Danube.[147] At this critical juncture, both Tsar Alexander I and Holy Roman Emperor Francis II decided to engage Napoleon in battle, despite reservations from some of their subordinates. Napoleon sent his army north in pursuit of the Allies but then ordered his forces to retreat so that he could feign a grave weakness.[148]
Desperate to lure the Allies into battle, Napoleon gave every indication in the days preceding the engagement that the French army was in a pitiful state, even abandoning the dominant Pratzen Heights, a sloping hill near the village of Austerlitz. At the Battle of Austerlitz, in Moravia on 2 December, he deployed the French army below the Pratzen Heights and deliberately weakened his right flank, enticing the Allies to launch a major assault there in the hopes of rolling up the whole French line. A forced march from Vienna by Marshal Davout and his III Corps plugged the gap left by Napoleon just in time.[148]
Meanwhile, the heavy Allied deployment against the French right flank weakened their center on the Pratzen Heights, which was viciously attacked by the IV Corps of Marshal Soult. With the Allied center demolished, the French swept through both enemy flanks and sent the Allies fleeing chaotically, capturing thousands of prisoners in the process. The battle is often seen as a tactical masterpiece because of the near-perfect execution of a calibrated but dangerous plan—of the same stature as Cannae, the celebrated triumph by Hannibal some 2,000 years before.[148]
The Allied disaster at Austerlitz significantly shook the faith of Emperor Francis in the British-led war effort. France and Austria agreed to an armistice immediately and the Treaty of Pressburg followed shortly after on 26 December. Pressburg took Austria out of both the war and the Coalition while reinforcing the earlier treaties of Campo Formio and of Lunéville between the two powers. The treaty confirmed the Austrian loss of lands to France in Italy and Bavaria, and lands in Germany to Napoleon’s German allies.[149]
It imposed an indemnity of 40 million francs on the defeated Habsburgs and allowed the fleeing Russian troops free passage through hostile territories and back to their home soil. Napoleon went on to say, «The battle of Austerlitz is the finest of all I have fought».[150] Frank McLynn suggests that Napoleon was so successful at Austerlitz that he lost touch with reality, and what used to be French foreign policy became a «personal Napoleonic one».[151] Vincent Cronin disagrees, stating that Napoleon was not overly ambitious for himself, «he embodied the ambitions of thirty million Frenchmen».[152]
Middle-Eastern alliances
Napoleon continued to entertain a grand scheme to establish a French presence in the Middle East in order to put pressure on Britain and Russia, and perhaps form an alliance with the Ottoman Empire.[77] In February 1806, Ottoman Emperor Selim III recognised Napoleon as Emperor. He also opted for an alliance with France, calling France «our sincere and natural ally».[153] That decision brought the Ottoman Empire into a losing war against Russia and Britain. A Franco-Persian alliance was formed between Napoleon and the Persian Empire of Fat′h-Ali Shah Qajar. It collapsed in 1807 when France and Russia formed an unexpected alliance.[77] In the end, Napoleon had made no effective alliances in the Middle East.[154]
War of the Fourth Coalition and Tilsit
After Austerlitz, Napoleon established the Confederation of the Rhine in 1806. A collection of German states intended to serve as a buffer zone between France and Central Europe, the creation of the Confederation spelled the end of the Holy Roman Empire and significantly alarmed the Prussians. The brazen reorganization of German territory by the French risked threatening Prussian influence in the region, if not eliminating it outright. War fever in Berlin rose steadily throughout the summer of 1806. At the insistence of his court, especially his wife Queen Louise, Frederick William III decided to challenge the French domination of Central Europe by going to war.[155]
The initial military manoeuvres began in September 1806. In a letter to Marshal Soult detailing the plan for the campaign, Napoleon described the essential features of Napoleonic warfare and introduced the phrase le bataillon-carré («square battalion»).[156] In the bataillon-carré system, the various corps of the Grande Armée would march uniformly together in close supporting distance.[156] If any single corps was attacked, the others could quickly spring into action and arrive to help.[157]
Napoleon invaded Prussia with 180,000 troops, rapidly marching on the right bank of the River Saale. As in previous campaigns, his fundamental objective was to destroy one opponent before reinforcements from another could tip the balance of the war. Upon learning the whereabouts of the Prussian army, the French swung westwards and crossed the Saale with overwhelming force. At the twin battles of Jena and Auerstedt, fought on 14 October, the French convincingly defeated the Prussians and inflicted heavy casualties. With several major commanders dead or incapacitated, the Prussian king proved incapable of effectively commanding the army, which began to quickly disintegrate.[157]
In a vaunted pursuit that epitomized the «peak of Napoleonic warfare», according to historian Richard Brooks,[157] the French managed to capture 140,000 soldiers, over 2,000 cannons and hundreds of ammunition wagons, all in a single month. Historian David Chandler wrote of the Prussian forces: «Never has the morale of any army been more completely shattered».[156] Despite their overwhelming defeat, the Prussians refused to negotiate with the French until the Russians had an opportunity to enter the fight.
Following his triumph, Napoleon imposed the first elements of the Continental System through the Berlin Decree issued in November 1806. The Continental System, which prohibited European nations from trading with Britain, was widely violated throughout his reign.[158][159] In the next few months, Napoleon marched against the advancing Russian armies through Poland and was involved in the bloody stalemate at the Battle of Eylau in February 1807.[160] After a period of rest and consolidation on both sides, the war restarted in June with an initial struggle at Heilsberg that proved indecisive.[161]
On 14 June Napoleon obtained an overwhelming victory over the Russians at the Battle of Friedland, wiping out the majority of the Russian army in a very bloody struggle. The scale of their defeat convinced the Russians to make peace with the French. On 19 June, Tsar Alexander sent an envoy to seek an armistice with Napoleon. The latter assured the envoy that the Vistula River represented the natural borders between French and Russian influence in Europe. On that basis, the two emperors began peace negotiations at the town of Tilsit after meeting on an iconic raft on the River Niemen. The very first thing Alexander said to Napoleon was probably well-calibrated: «I hate the English as much as you do».[161] Their meeting lasted two hours. Despite waging wars against each other the two Emperors were very much impressed and fascinated by one another. “Never,” said Alexander afterward, “did I love any man as I loved that man.”[162]
Alexander faced pressure from his brother, Duke Constantine, to make peace with Napoleon. Given the victory he had just achieved, the French emperor offered the Russians relatively lenient terms—demanding that Russia join the Continental System, withdraw its forces from Wallachia and Moldavia, and hand over the Ionian Islands to France.[163] By contrast, Napoleon dictated very harsh peace terms for Prussia, despite the ceaseless exhortations of Queen Louise. Wiping out half of Prussian territories from the map, Napoleon created a new kingdom of 2,800 square kilometres (1,100 sq mi) called Westphalia and appointed his young brother Jérôme as its monarch.[164]
Prussia’s humiliating treatment at Tilsit caused a deep and bitter antagonism that festered as the Napoleonic era progressed. Moreover, Alexander’s pretensions at friendship with Napoleon led the latter to seriously misjudge the true intentions of his Russian counterpart, who would violate numerous provisions of the treaty in the next few years. Despite these problems, the Treaties of Tilsit at last gave Napoleon a respite from war and allowed him to return to France, which he had not seen in over 300 days.[164]
Peninsular War and Erfurt
The settlements at Tilsit gave Napoleon time to organize his empire. One of his major objectives became enforcing the Continental System against the British forces. He decided to focus his attention on the Kingdom of Portugal, which consistently violated his trade prohibitions. After defeat in the War of the Oranges in 1801, Portugal adopted a double-sided policy.
Unhappy with this change of policy by the Portuguese government, Napoleon negotiated a secret treaty with Charles IV of Spain and sent an army to invade Portugal.[165] On 17 October 1807, 24,000 French troops under General Junot crossed the Pyrenees with Spanish cooperation and headed towards Portugal to enforce Napoleon’s orders.[166] This attack was the first step in what would eventually become the Peninsular War, a six-year struggle that significantly sapped French strength. Throughout the winter of 1808, French agents became increasingly involved in Spanish internal affairs, attempting to incite discord between members of the Spanish royal family. On 16 February 1808, secret French machinations finally materialized when Napoleon announced that he would intervene to mediate between the rival political factions in the country.[167]
Marshal Murat led 120,000 troops into Spain. The French arrived in Madrid on 24 March,[168] where wild riots against the occupation erupted just a few weeks later. Napoleon appointed his brother, Joseph Bonaparte, as the new King of Spain in the summer of 1808. The appointment enraged a heavily religious and conservative Spanish population. Resistance to French aggression soon spread throughout Spain. The shocking French defeats at the Battle of Bailén and the Battle of Vimiero gave hope to Napoleon’s enemies and partly persuaded the French emperor to intervene in person.[169]
Before going to Iberia, Napoleon decided to address several lingering issues with the Russians. At the Congress of Erfurt in October 1808, Napoleon hoped to keep Russia on his side during the upcoming struggle in Spain and during any potential conflict against Austria. The two sides reached an agreement, the Erfurt Convention, that called upon Britain to cease its war against France, that recognized the Russian conquest of Finland from Sweden and made it an autonomous Grand Duchy,[170] and that affirmed Russian support for France in a possible war against Austria «to the best of its ability».[171]
Napoleon then returned to France and prepared for war. The Grande Armée, under the Emperor’s personal command, rapidly crossed the Ebro River in November 1808 and inflicted a series of crushing defeats against the Spanish forces. After clearing the last Spanish force guarding the capital at Somosierra, Napoleon entered Madrid on 4 December with 80,000 troops.[172] He then unleashed his soldiers against Moore and the British forces. The British were swiftly driven to the coast, and they withdrew from Spain entirely after a last stand at the Battle of Corunna in January 1809 and the death of Moore.[173]
Napoleon accepting the surrender of Madrid, 4 December 1808
Napoleon would end up leaving Iberia in order to deal with the Austrians in Central Europe, but the Peninsular War continued on long after his absence. He never returned to Spain after the 1808 campaign. Several months after Corunna, the British sent another army to the peninsula under Arthur Wellesley, the future Duke of Wellington. The war then settled into a complex and asymmetric strategic deadlock where all sides struggled to gain the upper hand. The highlight of the conflict became the brutal guerrilla warfare that engulfed much of the Spanish countryside. Both sides committed the worst atrocities of the Napoleonic Wars during this phase of the conflict.[174]
The vicious guerrilla fighting in Spain, largely absent from the French campaigns in Central Europe, severely disrupted the French lines of supply and communication. Although France maintained roughly 300,000 troops in Iberia during the Peninsular War, the vast majority were tied down to garrison duty and to intelligence operations.[174] The French were never able to concentrate all of their forces effectively, prolonging the war until events elsewhere in Europe finally turned the tide in favour of the Allies. After the invasion of Russia in 1812, the number of French troops in Spain vastly declined as Napoleon needed reinforcements to conserve his strategic position in Europe. By 1814 the Allies had pushed the French out of the peninsula.
The impact of the Napoleonic invasion of Spain and ousting of the Spanish Bourbon monarchy in favour of his brother Joseph had an enormous impact on the Spanish empire. In Spanish America many local elites formed juntas and set up mechanisms to rule in the name of Ferdinand VII of Spain, whom they considered the legitimate Spanish monarch. The outbreak of the Spanish American wars of independence in most of the empire was a result of Napoleon’s destabilizing actions in Spain and led to the rise of strongmen in the wake of these wars.[175]
War of the Fifth Coalition and Marie Louise
After four years on the sidelines, Austria sought another war with France to avenge its recent defeats. Austria could not count on Russian support because the latter was at war with Britain, Sweden, and the Ottoman Empire in 1809. Frederick William of Prussia initially promised to help the Austrians but reneged before conflict began.[176] A report from the Austrian finance minister suggested that the treasury would run out of money by the middle of 1809 if the large army that the Austrians had formed since the Third Coalition remained mobilized.[176] Although Archduke Charles warned that the Austrians were not ready for another showdown with Napoleon, a stance that landed him in the so-called «peace party», he did not want to see the army demobilized either.[176] On 8 February 1809, the advocates for war finally succeeded when the Imperial Government secretly decided on another confrontation against the French.[177]
In the early morning of 10 April, leading elements of the Austrian army crossed the Inn River and invaded Bavaria. The early Austrian attack surprised the French; Napoleon himself was still in Paris when he heard about the invasion. He arrived at Donauwörth on the 17th to find the Grande Armée in a dangerous position, with its two wings separated by 120 km (75 mi) and joined by a thin cordon of Bavarian troops. Charles pressed the left wing of the French army and hurled his men towards the III Corps of Marshal Davout.[178]
In response, Napoleon came up with a plan to cut off the Austrians in the celebrated Landshut Maneuver.[179] He realigned the axis of his army and marched his soldiers towards the town of Eckmühl. The French scored a convincing win in the resulting Battle of Eckmühl, forcing Charles to withdraw his forces over the Danube and into Bohemia. On 13 May, Vienna fell for the second time in four years, although the war continued since most of the Austrian army had survived the initial engagements in Southern Germany.
On 21 May, the French made their first major effort to cross the Danube, precipitating the Battle of Aspern-Essling. The battle was characterized by a vicious back-and-forth struggle for the two villages of Aspern and Essling, the focal points of the French bridgehead. A sustained Austrian artillery bombardment eventually convinced Napoleon to withdraw his forces back onto Lobau Island. Both sides inflicted about 23,000 casualties on each other.[180] It was the first defeat Napoleon suffered in a major set-piece battle, and it caused excitement throughout many parts of Europe because it proved that he could be beaten on the battlefield.[181]
After the setback at Aspern-Essling, Napoleon took more than six weeks in planning and preparing for contingencies before he made another attempt at crossing the Danube.[182] From 30 June to the early days of July, the French recrossed the Danube in strength, with more than 180,000 troops marching across the Marchfeld towards the Austrians.[182] Charles received the French with 150,000 of his own men.[183] In the ensuing Battle of Wagram, which also lasted two days, Napoleon commanded his forces in what was the largest battle of his career up until then. Napoleon finished off the battle with a concentrated central thrust that punctured a hole in the Austrian army and forced Charles to retreat. Austrian losses were very heavy, reaching well over 40,000 casualties.[184] The French were too exhausted to pursue the Austrians immediately, but Napoleon eventually caught up with Charles at Znaim and the latter signed an armistice on 12 July.
In the Kingdom of Holland, the British launched the Walcheren Campaign to open up a second front in the war and to relieve the pressure on the Austrians. The British army only landed at Walcheren on 30 July, by which point the Austrians had already been defeated. The Walcheren Campaign was characterized by little fighting but heavy casualties thanks to the popularly dubbed «Walcheren Fever». Over 4,000 British troops were lost in a bungled campaign, and the rest withdrew in December 1809.[185] The main strategic result from the campaign became the delayed political settlement between the French and the Austrians. Emperor Francis waited to see how the British performed in their theatre before entering into negotiations with Napoleon. Once it became apparent the British were going nowhere, the Austrians agreed to peace talks.[citation needed]
The resulting Treaty of Schönbrunn in October 1809 was the harshest that France had imposed on Austria in recent memory. Metternich and Archduke Charles had the preservation of the Habsburg Empire as their fundamental goal, and to this end, they succeeded by making Napoleon seek more modest goals in return for promises of friendship between the two powers.[186] While most of the hereditary lands remained a part of the Habsburg realm, France received Carinthia, Carniola, and the Adriatic ports, while Galicia was given to the Poles and the Salzburg area of the Tyrol went to the Bavarians.[186] Austria lost over three million subjects, about one-fifth of her total population, as a result of these territorial changes.[187]
Napoleon turned his focus to domestic affairs after the war. Empress Joséphine had still not given birth to a child from Napoleon, who became worried about the future of his empire following his death. Desperate for a legitimate heir, Napoleon divorced Joséphine on 10 January 1810 and started looking for a new wife. Hoping to cement the recent alliance with Austria through a family connection, Napoleon married the 18-year-old Archduchess Marie Louise, daughter of Emperor Francis II. On 20 March 1811, Marie Louise gave birth to a baby boy, whom Napoleon made heir apparent and bestowed the title of King of Rome. His son never actually ruled the empire, but given his brief titular rule and cousin Louis-Napoléon’s subsequent naming himself Napoléon III, historians often refer to him as Napoleon II.[188]
Invasion of Russia
In 1808, Napoleon and Tsar Alexander met at the Congress of Erfurt to preserve the Russo-French alliance. The leaders had a friendly personal relationship after their first meeting at Tilsit in 1807.[189] By 1811, however, tensions had increased, a strain on the relationship became the regular violations of the Continental System by the Russians as their economy was failing, which led Napoleon to threaten Alexander with serious consequences if he formed an alliance with Britain.[190]
By 1812, advisers to Alexander suggested the possibility of an invasion of the French Empire and the recapture of Poland. On receipt of intelligence reports on Russia’s war preparations, Napoleon expanded his Grande Armée to more than 450,000 men.[191] He ignored repeated advice against an invasion of the Russian heartland and prepared for an offensive campaign; on 24 June 1812 the invasion commenced.[192]
In an attempt to gain increased support from Polish nationalists and patriots, Napoleon termed the war the Second Polish War—the First Polish War had been the Bar Confederation uprising by Polish nobles against Russia in 1768. Polish patriots wanted the Russian part of Poland to be joined with the Duchy of Warsaw and an independent Poland created. This was rejected by Napoleon, who stated he had promised his ally Austria this would not happen. Napoleon refused to manumit the Russian serfs because of concerns this might provoke a reaction in his army’s rear. The serfs later committed atrocities against French soldiers during France’s retreat.[193]
The Russians avoided Napoleon’s objective of a decisive engagement and instead retreated deeper into Russia. A brief attempt at resistance was made at Smolensk in August; the Russians were defeated in a series of battles, and Napoleon resumed his advance. The Russians again avoided battle, although in a few cases this was only achieved because Napoleon uncharacteristically hesitated to attack when the opportunity arose. Owing to the Russian army’s scorched earth tactics, the French found it increasingly difficult to forage food for themselves and their horses.[194]
The Russians eventually offered battle outside Moscow on 7 September: the Battle of Borodino resulted in approximately 44,000 Russian and 35,000 French dead, wounded or captured, and may have been the bloodiest day of battle in history up to that point in time.[195] Although the French had won, the Russian army had accepted, and withstood, the major battle Napoleon had hoped would be decisive. Napoleon’s own account was: «The most terrible of all my battles was the one before Moscow. The French showed themselves to be worthy of victory, but the Russians showed themselves worthy of being invincible».[196]
The Russian army withdrew and retreated past Moscow. Napoleon entered the city, assuming its fall would end the war and Alexander would negotiate peace. Moscow was burned, rather than surrendered, on the order of Moscow’s governor Feodor Rostopchin. After five weeks, Napoleon and his army left. In early November Napoleon became concerned about the loss of control back in France after the Malet coup of 1812. His army walked through snow up to their knees, and nearly 10,000 men and horses froze to death on the night of 8/9 November alone. After the Battle of Berezina Napoleon managed to escape but had to abandon much of the remaining artillery and baggage train. On 5 December, shortly before arriving in Vilnius, Napoleon left the army in a sledge.[197]
The French suffered in the course of a ruinous retreat, including from the harshness of the Russian Winter. The Armée had begun as over 400,000 frontline troops, with fewer than 40,000 crossing the Berezina River in November 1812.[198] The Russians had lost 150,000 soldiers in battle and hundreds of thousands of civilians.[199]
War of the Sixth Coalition
There was a lull in fighting over the winter of 1812–13 while both the Russians and the French rebuilt their forces; Napoleon was able to field 350,000 troops.[200] Heartened by France’s loss in Russia, Prussia joined with Austria, Sweden, Russia, Great Britain, Spain, and Portugal in a new coalition. Napoleon assumed command in Germany and inflicted a series of defeats on the Coalition culminating in the Battle of Dresden in August 1813.[201]
Despite these successes, the numbers continued to mount against Napoleon, and the French army was pinned down by a force twice its size and lost at the Battle of Leipzig. This was by far the largest battle of the Napoleonic Wars and cost more than 90,000 casualties in total.[202]
The Allies offered peace terms in the Frankfurt proposals in November 1813. Napoleon would remain as Emperor of the French, but it would be reduced to its «natural frontiers». That meant that France could retain control of Belgium, Savoy and the Rhineland (the west bank of the Rhine River), while giving up control of all the rest, including all of Spain and the Netherlands, and most of Italy and Germany. Metternich told Napoleon these were the best terms the Allies were likely to offer; after further victories, the terms would be harsher and harsher. Metternich’s motivation was to maintain France as a balance against Russian threats while ending the highly destabilizing series of wars.[203]
Napoleon, expecting to win the war, delayed too long and lost this opportunity; by December the Allies had withdrawn the offer. When his back was to the wall in 1814 he tried to reopen peace negotiations on the basis of accepting the Frankfurt proposals. The Allies now had new, harsher terms that included the retreat of France to its 1791 boundaries, which meant the loss of Belgium, but Napoleon would remain Emperor. However, he rejected the term. The British wanted Napoleon permanently removed, and they prevailed, though Napoleon adamantly refused.[203][204]
Napoleon after his abdication in Fontainebleau, 4 April 1814, by Paul Delaroche
Napoleon withdrew into France, his army reduced to 70,000 soldiers and little cavalry; he faced more than three times as many Allied troops.[205] Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s older brother, abdicated as king of Spain on 13 December 1813 and assumed the title of lieutenant general to save the collapsing empire. The French were surrounded: British armies pressed from the south, and other Coalition forces positioned to attack from the German states. By the middle of January 1814, the Coalition had already entered France’s borders and launched a two-pronged attack on Paris, with Prussia entering from the north, and Austria from the East, marching out of the capitulated Swiss confederation. The French Empire, however, would not go down so easily. Napoleon launched a series of victories in the Six Days’ Campaign. While they repulsed the coalition forces and delayed the capture of Paris by at least a full month, these were not significant enough to turn the tide. The coalitionaries camped on the outskirts of the capital on 29 March. A day later, they advanced onto the demoralised soldiers protecting the city. Joseph Bonaparte led a final battle at the gates of Paris. They were greatly outnumbered, as 30,000 French soldiers were pitted against a combined coalition force that was 5 times greater than theirs. They were defeated, and Joseph retreated out of the city. The leaders of Paris surrendered to the Coalition on the last day of March 1814.[206] On 1 April, Alexander addressed the Sénat conservateur. Long docile to Napoleon, under Talleyrand’s prodding it had turned against him. Alexander told the Sénat that the Allies were fighting against Napoleon, not France, and they were prepared to offer honourable peace terms if Napoleon were removed from power. The next day, the Sénat passed the Acte de déchéance de l’Empereur («Emperor’s Demise Act»), which declared Napoleon deposed.
Napoleon had advanced as far as Fontainebleau when he learned that Paris had fallen. When Napoleon proposed the army march on the capital, his senior officers and marshals mutinied.[207] On 4 April, led by Ney, the senior officers confronted Napoleon. When Napoleon asserted the army would follow him, Ney replied the army would follow its generals. While the ordinary soldiers and regimental officers wanted to fight on, the senior commanders were unwilling to continue. Without any senior officers or marshals, any prospective invasion of Paris would have been impossible. Bowing to the inevitable, on 4 April Napoleon abdicated in favour of his son, with Marie Louise as regent. However, the Allies refused to accept this under prodding from Alexander, who feared that Napoleon might find an excuse to retake the throne.[208][209] Napoleon was then forced to announce his unconditional abdication only two days later.[209]
In his farewell address to the soldiers of Old Guard in 20 April, Napoleon said:
«Soldiers of my Old Guard, I have come to bid you farewell. For twenty years you have accompanied me faithfully on the paths of honor and glory. …With men like you, our cause was [not] lost, but the war would have dragged on interminably, and it would have been a civil war. … So I am sacrificing our interests to those of our country. …Do not lament my fate; if I have agreed to live on, it is to serve our glory. I wish to write the history of the great deeds we have done together. Farewell, my children!»[210]
Exile to Elba
Napoleon leaving Elba on 26 February 1815, by Joseph Beaume (1836)
The Allied Powers having declared that Emperor Napoleon was the sole obstacle to the restoration of peace in Europe, Emperor Napoleon, faithful to his oath, declares that he renounces, for himself and his heirs, the thrones of France and Italy, and that there is no personal sacrifice, even that of his life, which he is not ready to make in the interests of France.
Done in the palace of Fontainebleau, 11 April 1814.— Act of abdication of Napoleon[211]
In the Treaty of Fontainebleau, the Allies exiled Napoleon to Elba, an island of 12,000 inhabitants in the Mediterranean, 10 km (6 mi) off the Tuscan coast. They gave him sovereignty over the island and allowed him to retain the title of Emperor. Napoleon attempted suicide with a pill he had carried after nearly being captured by the Russians during the retreat from Moscow. Its potency had weakened with age, however, and he survived to be exiled, while his wife and son took refuge in Austria.[212]
He was conveyed to the island on HMS Undaunted by Captain Thomas Ussher, and he arrived at Portoferraio on 30 May 1814. In the first few months on Elba he created a small navy and army, developed the iron mines, oversaw the construction of new roads, issued decrees on modern agricultural methods, and overhauled the island’s legal and educational system.[213][214]
A few months into his exile, Napoleon learned that his ex-wife Josephine had died in France. He was devastated by the news, locking himself in his room and refusing to leave for two days.[215]
Hundred Days
Separated from his wife and son, who had returned to Austria, cut off from the allowance guaranteed to him by the Treaty of Fontainebleau, and aware of rumours he was about to be banished to a remote island in the Atlantic Ocean,[216] Napoleon escaped from Elba in the brig Inconstant on 26 February 1815 with 700 men.[216] Two days later, he landed on the French mainland at Golfe-Juan and started heading north.[216]
The 5th Regiment was sent to intercept him and made contact just south of Grenoble on 7 March 1815. Napoleon approached the regiment alone, dismounted his horse and, when he was within gunshot range, shouted to the soldiers, «Here I am. Kill your Emperor, if you wish.»[217] The soldiers quickly responded with, «Vive L’Empereur!» Ney, who had boasted to the restored Bourbon king, Louis XVIII, that he would bring Napoleon to Paris in an iron cage, affectionately kissed his former emperor and forgot his oath of allegiance to the Bourbon monarch. The two then marched together toward Paris with a growing army. The unpopular Louis XVIII fled to Belgium after realizing that he had little political support. On 13 March, the powers at the Congress of Vienna declared Napoleon an outlaw. Four days later, Great Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia each pledged to put 150,000 men into the field to end his rule.[218]
Napoleon arrived in Paris on 20 March and governed for a period now called the Hundred Days. By the start of June, the armed forces available to him had reached 200,000, and he decided to go on the offensive to attempt to drive a wedge between the oncoming British and Prussian armies. The French Army of the North crossed the frontier into the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, in modern-day Belgium.[219]
Napoleon’s forces fought two Coalition armies, commanded by the British Duke of Wellington and the Prussian Prince Blücher, at the Battle of Waterloo on 18 June 1815. Wellington’s army withstood repeated attacks by the French and drove them from the field while the Prussians arrived in force and broke through Napoleon’s right flank.
Napoleon returned to Paris and found that both the legislature and the people had turned against him. Realizing that his position was untenable, he abdicated on 22 June in favour of his son. He left Paris three days later and settled at Josephine’s former palace in Malmaison (on the western bank of the Seine about 17 kilometres (11 mi) west of Paris). Even as Napoleon travelled to Paris, the Coalition forces swept through France (arriving in the vicinity of Paris on 29 June), with the stated intent of restoring Louis XVIII to the French throne.
When Napoleon heard that Prussian troops had orders to capture him dead or alive, he fled to Rochefort, considering an escape to the United States. British ships were blocking every port. Napoleon surrendered to Captain Frederick Maitland on HMS Bellerophon on 15 July 1815.[220]
Exile on Saint Helena
Napoleon on Saint Helena, watercolor by Franz Josef Sandmann, c. 1820
The British kept Napoleon on the island of Saint Helena in the Atlantic Ocean, 1,870 km (1,162 mi) from the west coast of Africa. They also took the precaution of sending a small garrison of soldiers to both Saint Helena and the uninhabited Ascension Island, which lay between St. Helena and Europe, to prevent any escape from the island.[221]
Napoleon was moved to Longwood House on Saint Helena in December 1815; it had fallen into disrepair, and the location was damp, windswept and unhealthy.[222][223] The Times published articles insinuating the British government was trying to hasten his death. Napoleon often complained of the living conditions of Longwood House in letters to the island’s governor and his custodian, Hudson Lowe,[224] while his attendants complained of «colds, catarrhs, damp floors and poor provisions.»[225] Modern scientists have speculated that his later illness may have arisen from arsenic poisoning caused by copper arsenite in the wallpaper at Longwood House.[226]
With a small cadre of followers, Napoleon dictated his memoirs and grumbled about the living conditions. Lowe cut Napoleon’s expenditure, ruled that no gifts were allowed if they mentioned his imperial status, and made his supporters sign a guarantee they would stay with the prisoner indefinitely.[227] When he held a dinner party, men were expected to wear military dress and «women [appeared] in evening gowns and gems. It was an explicit denial of the circumstances of his captivity».[228]
While in exile, Napoleon wrote a book about Julius Caesar, one of his great heroes.[229] He also studied English under the tutelage of Count Emmanuel de Las Cases with the main aim of being able to read English newspapers and books, as access to French newspapers and books was heavily restricted to him on Saint Helena.[230] Napoleon also devoted himself to compiling a book «Mémorial de Ste-Hélène«, an account which reflected his self-depiction as a liberal, visionary ruler for European unification, deposed by reactionary elements of the Ancien Régime.[231]
Another pastime of Napoleon’s while in exile was playing card games.[232][233] The number of patiences named in his honour seems to suggest that he was an avid player of the solitary game. Napoleon at St Helena is described as being a favourite of his,[234] while Napoleon’s Favourite (or St. Helena) is clearly a contender. Other games with a Napoleonic theme include Napoleon’s Flank, Napoleon’s Shoulder, Napoleon’s Square and Little Napoleon Patience. However, Arnold argues that, while Napoleon played cards in exile, the notion that he played numerous patience games is «based on a misunderstanding».[232]
There were rumours of plots and even of his escape from Saint Helena, but in reality, no serious attempts were ever made.[235] For English poet Lord Byron, Napoleon was the epitome of the Romantic hero, the persecuted, lonely, and flawed genius.[236]
Death
Napoleon’s personal physician, Barry O’Meara, warned London that his declining state of health was mainly caused by the harsh treatment. During the last few years of his life, Napoleon confined himself for months on end in his damp, mold-infested and wretched habitation of Longwood. Years of isolation and loneliness took its toll on Napoleon’s mental health, having his court continually reduced, including the arrest of Count Emmanuel de Las Cases, conditions which Lord Holland used to bring about a debate regarding the treatment of Napoleon in captivity.[237]
In February 1821, Napoleon’s health began to deteriorate rapidly, and he reconciled with the Catholic Church. By March, he had become confined to bed. Napoleon died on 5 May 1821 at Longwood House at age 51, after making his last confession, Extreme Unction and Viaticum in the presence of Father Ange Vignali from his deathbed. His last words were, France, l’armée, tête d’armée, Joséphine («France, the army, head of the army, Joséphine»).[238][239][231]
Shortly after his death, an autopsy was conducted and Francesco Antommarchi, the doctor conducting the autopsy, cut off Napoleon’s penis.[29][page needed][240] Napoleon’s original death mask was created around 6 May, although it is not clear which doctor created it.[i][242] Napoleon’s heart and intestines were removed and contained separately in two sealed vessels, which were placed inside his coffin at his feet. In his will, he had asked to be buried on the banks of the Seine, but the British governor said he should be buried on Saint Helena, in the Valley of the Willows.[238]
In 1840, Louis Philippe I obtained permission from the British government to return Napoleon’s remains to France. His casket was opened to confirm that it still contained the former emperor. Despite being dead for nearly two decades, Napoleon had been very well preserved and not decomposed at all. On 15 December 1840, a state funeral was held. The horse-drawn hearse proceeded from the Arc de Triomphe down the Champs-Élysées, across the Place de la Concorde to the Esplanade des Invalides and then to the cupola in St Jérôme’s Chapel, where it remained until the tomb designed by Louis Visconti was completed.
In 1861, Napoleon’s remains were entombed in a sarcophagus of red quartzite from Russia (often mistaken for porphyry) in the crypt under the dome at Les Invalides.[243]
Cause of death
Situation of Napoleon’s body when his coffin was reopened on St Helena, by Jules Rigo, 1840
The cause of Napoleon’s death has been debated. His physician, François Carlo Antommarchi, led the autopsy, which found the cause of death to be stomach cancer. Antommarchi did not sign the official report.[244] Napoleon’s father had died of stomach cancer, although this was apparently unknown at the time of the autopsy.[245] Antommarchi found evidence of a stomach ulcer; this was the most convenient explanation for the British, who wanted to avoid criticism over their care of Napoleon.[238]
In 1955, the diaries of Napoleon’s valet, Louis Marchand, were published. His description of Napoleon in the months before his death led Sten Forshufvud in a 1961 paper in Nature to put forward other causes for his death, including deliberate arsenic poisoning.[246] Arsenic was used as a poison during the era because it was undetectable when administered over a long period. Furthermore, in a 1978 book with Ben Weider, Forshufvud noted that Napoleon’s body was found to be well preserved when moved in 1840. Arsenic is a strong preservative, and therefore this supported the poisoning hypothesis. Forshufvud and Weider observed that Napoleon had attempted to quench abnormal thirst by drinking large amounts of orgeat syrup that contained cyanide compounds in the almonds used for flavouring.[246] They maintained that the potassium tartrate used in his treatment prevented his stomach from expelling these compounds and that his thirst was a symptom of the poison. Their hypothesis was that the calomel given to Napoleon became an overdose, which killed him and left extensive tissue damage behind.[246] According to a 2007 article, the type of arsenic found in Napoleon’s hair shafts was mineral, the most toxic, and according to toxicologist Patrick Kintz, this supported the conclusion that he was murdered.[247]
There have been modern studies that have supported the original autopsy finding.[247] In a 2008 study, researchers analysed samples of Napoleon’s hair from throughout his life, as well as samples from his family and other contemporaries. All samples had high levels of arsenic, approximately 100 times higher than the current average. According to these researchers, Napoleon’s body was already heavily contaminated with arsenic as a boy, and the high arsenic concentration in his hair was not caused by intentional poisoning; people were constantly exposed to arsenic from glues and dyes throughout their lives.[j] Studies published in 2007 and 2008 dismissed evidence of arsenic poisoning, suggesting peptic ulcer and gastric cancer as the cause of death.[249]
Religion
Napoleon was baptised in Ajaccio on 21 July 1771. He was raised as a Catholic but never developed much faith,[250] though he recalled the day of his First Communion in the Catholic Church to be the happiest day of his life.[251][252] As an adult, Napoleon was a deist, believing in an absent and distant God. However, he had a keen appreciation of the power of organized religion in social and political affairs, and he paid a great deal of attention to bending it to his purposes. He noted the influence of Catholicism’s rituals and splendors.[250]
Napoleon had a civil marriage with Joséphine de Beauharnais, without religious ceremony. Napoleon was crowned Emperor on 2 December 1804 at Notre-Dame de Paris in a ceremony presided over by Pope Pius VII. On the eve of the coronation ceremony, and at the insistence of Pope Pius VII, a private religious wedding ceremony of Napoleon and Joséphine was celebrated. Cardinal Fesch performed the wedding.[253] This marriage was annulled by tribunals under Napoleon’s control in January 1810. On 1 April 1810, Napoleon married the Austrian princess Marie Louise in a Catholic ceremony. Napoleon was excommunicated by the Pope through the bull Quum memoranda in 1809, but later reconciled with the Catholic Church before his death in 1821.[254] While in exile in Saint Helena he is recorded to have said «I know men; and I tell you that Jesus Christ is not a man.»[255][256][257]
He also defended Muhammad («a great man») against Voltaire’s Mahomet.[258]
Concordat
Leaders of the Catholic Church taking the civil oath required by the Concordat
Seeking national reconciliation between revolutionaries and Catholics, Napoleon and Pope Pius VII signed the Concordat of 1801 on 15 July 1801. It solidified the Roman Catholic Church as the majority church of France and brought back most of its civil status. The hostility of devout Catholics against the state had now largely been resolved. The Concordat did not restore the vast church lands and endowments that had been seized during the revolution and sold off. As a part of the Concordat, Napoleon presented another set of laws called the Organic Articles.[259][260]
While the Concordat restored much power to the papacy, the balance of church–state relations had tilted firmly in Napoleon’s favour. He selected the bishops and supervised church finances. Napoleon and the Pope both found the Concordat useful. Similar arrangements were made with the Church in territories controlled by Napoleon, especially Italy and Germany.[261] Now, Napoleon could win favour with the Catholics while also controlling Rome in a political sense. Napoleon said in April 1801, «Skillful conquerors have not got entangled with priests. They can both contain them and use them». French children were issued a catechism that taught them to love and respect Napoleon.[262]
Arrest of Pope Pius VII
In 1809, under Napoleon’s orders, Pope Pius VII was placed under arrest in Italy, and in 1812 the prisoner Pontiff was transferred to France, being held in the Palace of Fontainebleau.[263] Because the arrest was made in a clandestine manner, some sources[264][263] describe it as a kidnapping. In January 1813, Napoleon personally forced the Pope to sign a humiliating «Concordat of Fontainebleau»[265] which was later repudiated by the Pontiff.[266] The Pope was not released until 1814, when the Coalition invaded France.
Religious emancipation
Napoleon emancipated Jews, as well as Protestants in Catholic countries and Catholics in Protestant countries, from laws which restricted them to ghettos, and he expanded their rights to property, worship, and careers. Despite the antisemitic reaction to Napoleon’s policies from foreign governments and within France, he believed emancipation would benefit France by attracting Jews to the country given the restrictions they faced elsewhere.[267]
In 1806 an assembly of Jewish notables was gathered by Napoleon to discuss 12 questions broadly dealing with the relations between Jews and Christians, as well as other issues dealing with the Jewish ability to integrate into French society. Later, after the questions were answered in a satisfactory way according to the Emperor, a «great Sanhedrin» was brought together to transform the answers into decisions that would form the basis of the future status of the Jews in France and the rest of the empire Napoleon was building.[268]
He stated, «I will never accept any proposals that will obligate the Jewish people to leave France, because to me the Jews are the same as any other citizen in our country. It takes weakness to chase them out of the country, but it takes strength to assimilate them».[269] He was seen as so favourable to the Jews that the Russian Orthodox Church formally condemned him as «Antichrist and the Enemy of God».[270]
One year after the final meeting of the Sanhedrin, on 17 March 1808, Napoleon placed the Jews on probation. Several new laws restricting the citizenship the Jews had been offered 17 years previously were instituted at that time. However, despite pressure from leaders of a number of Christian communities to refrain from granting Jews emancipation, within one year of the issue of the new restrictions, they were once again lifted in response to the appeal of Jews from all over France.[268]
Freemasonry
It is not known for certain if Napoleon was initiated into Freemasonry. As Emperor, he appointed his brothers to Masonic offices under his jurisdiction: Louis was given the title of Deputy Grand Master in 1805; Jerome the title of Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Westphalia; Joseph was appointed Grand Master of the Grand Orient de France; and finally Lucien was a member of the Grand Orient of France.[271]
Personality
Napoleon visiting the Palais Royal for the opening of the 8th session of the Tribunat in 1807, by Merry-Joseph Blondel
Historians emphasize the strength of the ambition that took Napoleon from an obscure village to rule over most of Europe.[272] In-depth academic studies about his early life conclude that up until age 2, he had a «gentle disposition».[30] His older brother, Joseph, frequently received their mother’s attention which made Napoleon more assertive and approval-driven. During his early schooling years, he would be harshly bullied by classmates for his Corsican identity and limited command of the French language. To withstand the stress he became domineering, eventually developing an inferiority complex.[30]
George F. E. Rudé stresses his «rare combination of will, intellect and physical vigour».[273] In one-on-one situations he typically had a hypnotic effect on people, seemingly bending the strongest leaders to his will.[274] He understood military technology, but was not an innovator in that regard.[275] He was an innovator in using the financial, bureaucratic, and diplomatic resources of France. He could rapidly dictate a series of complex commands to his subordinates, keeping in mind where major units were expected to be at each future point, and like a chess master, «seeing» the best plays moves ahead.[276] This intellectual vigour was accompanied by a mixture of «remarkable charisma and willpower» and «a furious temper» exhibited during failure of his plans; which commanded respect as well as dread from his adjutants.[277]
Napoleon maintained strict, efficient work habits, prioritizing what needed to be done. He cheated at cards, but repaid the losses; he had to win at everything he attempted.[278] He kept relays of staff and secretaries at work. Unlike many generals, Napoleon did not examine history to ask what Hannibal or Alexander or anyone else did in a similar situation. Critics said he won many battles simply because of luck; Napoleon responded, «Give me lucky generals», arguing that «luck» comes to leaders who recognize opportunity, and seize it.[279] Dwyer states that Napoleon’s victories at Austerlitz and Jena in 1805–06 heightened his sense of self-grandiosity, leaving him even more certain of his destiny and invincibility.[280] «I am of the race that founds empires» he once boasted, deeming himself an heir to the Ancient Romans.[281]
In terms of influence on events, it was more than Napoleon’s personality that took effect. He reorganized France itself to supply the men and money needed for wars.[282] He inspired his men—the Duke of Wellington said his presence on the battlefield was worth 40,000 soldiers, for he inspired confidence from privates to field marshals.[283] The force of his personality neutralized material difficulties as his soldiers fought with the confidence that with Napoleon in charge they would surely win.[284]
Image
The military historian Martin van Creveld has described him as «the most competent human being who ever lived».[285] Since his death, many towns, streets, ships, and even cartoon characters have been named after him. He has been portrayed in hundreds of films and discussed in hundreds of thousands of books and articles.[286][287][288] The German legal scholar Carl Theoder Welcker described Napoleon as «the greatest master of Machiavellism».[289]
When his contemporaries met him in person, many were surprised by his apparently unremarkable physical appearance in contrast to his significant deeds and reputation, especially in his youth, when he was consistently described as small and thin. English painter Joseph Farington, who observed Napoleon personally in 1802, commented that «Samuel Rogers stood a little way from me and… seemed to be disappointed in the look of [Napoleon’s] countenance [«face»] and said it was that of a little Italian.» Farington said Napoleon’s eyes were «lighter, and more of a grey, than I should have expected from his complexion», that «his person is below middle size», and that «his general aspect was milder than I had before thought it.»[290]
A personal friend of Napoleon’s said that when he first met him in Brienne-le-Château as a young man, Napoleon was only notable «for the dark color of his complexion, for his piercing and scrutinising glance, and for the style of his conversation»; he also said that Napoleon was personally a serious and somber man: «his conversation bore the appearance of ill-humor, and he was certainly not very amiable.»[291] Johann Ludwig Wurstemberger, who accompanied Napoleon from Camp Fornio in 1797 and on the Swiss campaign of 1798, noted that «Bonaparte was rather slight and emaciated-looking; his face, too, was very thin, with a dark complexion… his black, unpowdered hair hung down evenly over both shoulders», but that, despite his slight and unkempt appearance, «[h]is looks and expression were earnest and powerful.»[292]
Denis Davydov met him personally and considered him remarkably average in appearance:
His face was slightly swarthy, with regular features. His nose was not very large, but straight, with a slight, hardly noticeable bend. The hair on his head was dark reddish-blond; his eyebrows and eyelashes were much darker than the colour of his hair, and his blue eyes, set off by the almost black lashes, gave him a most pleasing expression … The man I saw was of short stature, just over five feet tall, rather heavy although he was only 37 years old.[293]
During the Napoleonic Wars, he was taken seriously by the British press as a dangerous tyrant, poised to invade. Despite or due to his average size, Napoleon was mocked in British newspapers as a short tempered small man and he was nicknamed «Little Boney in a strong fit».[294] A nursery rhyme warned children that Bonaparte ravenously ate naughty people; the «bogeyman».[295] The British propaganda about his supposedly small size was so successful that many people today «know» very little besides this untruth about him.[296] At 1.57 metres (5 ft 2 in), he had the height of an average French male but was short for an aristocrat or officer (partly why he was assigned to the artillery, since at the time the infantry and cavalry required more commanding figures).[297]
Some historians believe his size at death was incorrectly recorded due to use of an obsolete old French yardstick (a French foot equals 33 cm, while an English foot equals 30.47 cm).[297][298] But Napoleon was a champion of the metric system and had no use for the old yardsticks that had been out of use since 1793 in France. It is likely that he was 1.57 m (5 ft 2 in), the height measured on St. Helena (a British island), since he would have most likely been measured with an English yardstick rather than a yardstick of the French Old Regime.[297] Napoleon surrounded himself with tall bodyguards and was affectionately nicknamed le petit caporal (the little corporal), reflecting his reported camaraderie with his soldiers rather than his height.
When he became First Consul and later Emperor, Napoleon eschewed his general’s uniform and habitually wore the green colonel uniform (non-Hussar) of a colonel of the Chasseur à Cheval of the Imperial Guard, the regiment that served as his personal escort many times, with a large bicorne. He also habitually wore (usually on Sundays) the blue uniform of a colonel of the Imperial Guard Foot Grenadiers (blue with white facings and red cuffs). He also wore his Légion d’honneur star, medal and ribbon, and the Order of the Iron Crown decorations, white French-style culottes and white stockings. This was in contrast to the complex uniforms with many decorations of his marshals and those around him.
In his later years he gained quite a bit of weight and had a complexion considered pale or sallow, something contemporaries took note of. Novelist Paul de Kock, who saw him in 1811 on the balcony of the Tuileries, called Napoleon «yellow, obese, and bloated».[299] A British captain who met him in 1815 stated «I felt very much disappointed, as I believe everyone else did, in his appearance … He is fat, rather what we call pot-bellied, and although his leg is well shaped, it is rather clumsy … He is very sallow, with light grey eyes, and rather thin, greasy-looking brown hair, and altogether a very nasty, priestlike-looking fellow.»[300]
The stock character of Napoleon is a comically short «petty tyrant» and this has become a cliché in popular culture. He is often portrayed wearing a large bicorne hat—sideways—with a hand-in-waistcoat gesture—a reference to the painting produced in 1812 by Jacques-Louis David.[301] In 1908 Alfred Adler, a psychologist, cited Napoleon to describe an inferiority complex in which short people adopt an over-aggressive behaviour to compensate for lack of height; this inspired the term Napoleon complex.[302]
Reforms
Napoleon instituted various reforms, such as higher education, a tax code, road and sewer systems, and established the Banque de France, the first central bank in French history. He negotiated the Concordat of 1801 with the Catholic Church, which sought to reconcile the mostly Catholic population to his regime. It was presented alongside the Organic Articles, which regulated public worship in France. He dissolved the Holy Roman Empire prior to German Unification later in the 19th century. The sale of the Louisiana Territory to the United States doubled the size of the United States.[303]
In May 1802, he instituted the Legion of Honour, a substitute for the old royalist decorations and orders of chivalry, to encourage civilian and military achievements; the order is still the highest decoration in France.[304]
Napoleonic Code
First page of the 1804 original edition of the Code Civil
Napoleon’s set of civil laws, the Code Civil—now often known as the Napoleonic Code—was prepared by committees of legal experts under the supervision of Jean Jacques Régis de Cambacérès, the Second Consul. Napoleon participated actively in the sessions of the Council of State that revised the drafts. The development of the code was a fundamental change in the nature of the civil law legal system with its stress on clearly written and accessible law. Other codes («Les cinq codes») were commissioned by Napoleon to codify criminal and commerce law; a Code of Criminal Instruction was published, which enacted rules of due process.[305]
The Napoleonic code was adopted throughout much of Continental Europe, though only in the lands he conquered, and remained in force after Napoleon’s defeat. Napoleon said: «My true glory is not to have won forty battles … Waterloo will erase the memory of so many victories. … But … what will live forever, is my Civil Code».[306] The Code influences a quarter of the world’s jurisdictions such as those in Continental Europe, the Americas, and Africa.[307]
Dieter Langewiesche described the code as a «revolutionary project» that spurred the development of bourgeois society in Germany by the extension of the right to own property and an acceleration towards the end of feudalism. Napoleon reorganized what had been the Holy Roman Empire, made up of about three hundred Kleinstaaterei, into a more streamlined forty-state Confederation of the Rhine; this helped promote the German Confederation and the unification of Germany in 1871.[308]
The movement toward Italian unification was similarly precipitated by Napoleonic rule.[309] These changes contributed to the development of nationalism and the nation state.[310]
Napoleon directly overthrew remnants of feudalism in much of western Continental Europe. He liberalized property laws, ended seigneurial dues, abolished the guild of merchants and craftsmen to facilitate entrepreneurship, legalized divorce, closed the Jewish ghettos and made Jews equal to everyone else. The Inquisition ended as did the Holy Roman Empire. The power of church courts and religious authority was sharply reduced and equality under the law was proclaimed for all men.[311]
Warfare
Statue in Cherbourg-Octeville unveiled by Napoleon III in 1858. Napoleon I strengthened the town’s defences to prevent British naval incursions.
In the field of military organization, Napoleon borrowed from previous theorists such as Jacques Antoine Hippolyte, Comte de Guibert, and from the reforms of preceding French governments, and then developed much of what was already in place. He continued the policy, which emerged from the Revolution, of promotion based primarily on merit.[312]
Corps replaced divisions as the largest army units, mobile artillery was integrated into reserve batteries, the staff system became more fluid and cavalry returned as an important formation in French military doctrine. These methods are now referred to as essential features of Napoleonic warfare.[312] Though he consolidated the practice of modern conscription introduced by the Directory, one of the restored monarchy’s first acts was to end it.[313]
His opponents learned from Napoleon’s innovations. The increased importance of artillery after 1807 stemmed from his creation of a highly mobile artillery force, the growth in artillery numbers, and changes in artillery practices. As a result of these factors, Napoleon, rather than relying on infantry to wear away the enemy’s defences, now could use massed artillery as a spearhead to pound a break in the enemy’s line that was then exploited by supporting infantry and cavalry. McConachy rejects the alternative theory that growing reliance on artillery by the French army beginning in 1807 was an outgrowth of the declining quality of the French infantry and, later, France’s inferiority in cavalry numbers.[314] Weapons and other kinds of military technology remained static through the Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras, but 18th-century operational mobility underwent change.[315]
Napoleon’s biggest influence was in the conduct of warfare. Antoine-Henri Jomini explained Napoleon’s methods in a widely used textbook that influenced all European and American armies.[316] Napoleon was regarded by the influential military theorist Carl von Clausewitz as a genius in the operational art of war, and historians rank him as a great military commander.[317] Wellington, when asked who was the greatest general of the day, answered: «In this age, in past ages, in any age, Napoleon».[318][incomplete short citation]
Under Napoleon, a new emphasis towards the destruction, not just outmaneuvering, of enemy armies emerged. Invasions of enemy territory occurred over broader fronts which made wars costlier and more decisive. The political effect of war increased; defeat for a European power meant more than the loss of isolated enclaves. Near-Carthaginian peaces intertwined whole national efforts, intensifying the Revolutionary phenomenon of total war.[319]
Metric system
The official introduction of the metric system in September 1799 was unpopular in large sections of French society. Napoleon’s rule greatly aided adoption of the new standard not only across France but also across the French sphere of influence. Napoleon took a retrograde step in 1812 when he passed legislation to introduce the mesures usuelles (traditional units of measurement) for retail trade,[320] a system of measure that resembled the pre-revolutionary units but were based on the kilogram and the metre; for example, the livre metrique (metric pound) was 500 g,[321] in contrast to the value of the livre du roi (the king’s pound), 489.5 g.[322] Other units of measure were rounded in a similar manner prior to the definitive introduction of the metric system across parts of Europe in the middle of the 19th century.[323]
Education
Napoleon’s educational reforms laid the foundation of a modern system of education in France and throughout much of Europe.[324] Napoleon synthesized the best academic elements from the Ancien Régime, The Enlightenment, and the Revolution, with the aim of establishing a stable, well-educated and prosperous society. He made French the only official language. He left some primary education in the hands of religious orders, but he offered public support to secondary education. Napoleon founded a number of state secondary schools (lycées) designed to produce a standardized education that was uniform across France.[325]
All students were taught the sciences along with modern and classical languages. Unlike the system during the Ancien Régime, religious topics did not dominate the curriculum, although they were present with the teachers from the clergy. Napoleon hoped to use religion to produce social stability.[325] He gave special attention to the advanced centers, such as the École Polytechnique, that provided both military expertise and state-of-the-art research in science.[326] Napoleon made some of the first efforts at establishing a system of secular and public education.[when?] The system featured scholarships and strict discipline, with the result being a French educational system that outperformed its European counterparts, many of which borrowed from the French system.[327]
Memory and evaluation
Criticism
In the political realm, historians debate whether Napoleon was «an enlightened despot who laid the foundations of modern Europe» or «a megalomaniac who wrought greater misery than any man before the coming of Hitler».[328] Many historians have concluded that he had grandiose foreign policy ambitions. The Continental powers as late as 1808 were willing to give him nearly all of his gains and titles, but some scholars maintain he was overly aggressive and pushed for too much, until his empire collapsed.[329][330]
He was considered a tyrant and usurper by his opponents at the time and ever since. His critics charge that he was not troubled when faced with the prospect of war and death for thousands, turned his search for undisputed rule into a series of conflicts throughout Europe and ignored treaties and conventions alike.[331] His role in the Haitian Revolution and decision to reinstate slavery in France’s overseas colonies are controversial and affect his reputation.[332] French liberal intellectual Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) was a staunch critic of political homogenisation and personality cult that dominated Napoleonic France and wrote several books condemning Napoleon such as «The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation» (1814) and «Principles of Politics Applicable to All Representative Governments» (1815). According to Constant, Bonapartism was even more tyrannical than the Bourbon monarchy, since it forced the masses to support its grand universalist narrative through imperialism and jingoism.[333]
Napoleon institutionalized plunder of conquered territories: French museums contain art stolen by Napoleon’s forces from across Europe. Artefacts were brought to the Musée du Louvre for a grand central museum; an example which would later be followed by others.[334] He was compared to Adolf Hitler by the historian Pieter Geyl in 1947,[335] and Claude Ribbe in 2005.[336] David G. Chandler, a historian of Napoleonic warfare, wrote in 1973 that, «Nothing could be more degrading to the former [Napoleon] and more flattering to the latter [Hitler]. The comparison is odious. On the whole Napoleon was inspired by a noble dream, wholly dissimilar from Hitler’s… Napoleon left great and lasting testimonies to his genius—in codes of law and national identities which survive to the present day. Adolf Hitler left nothing but destruction.»[337]
Critics argue Napoleon’s true legacy must reflect the loss of status for France and needless deaths brought by his rule: historian Victor Davis Hanson writes, «After all, the military record is unquestioned—17 years of wars, perhaps six million Europeans dead, France bankrupt, her overseas colonies lost.»[338] McLynn states that, «He can be viewed as the man who set back European economic life for a generation by the dislocating impact of his wars.»[331] Vincent Cronin replies that such criticism relies on the flawed premise that Napoleon was responsible for the wars which bear his name, when in fact France was the victim of a series of coalitions that aimed to destroy the ideals of the Revolution.[339]
British military historian Correlli Barnett calls him «a social misfit» who exploited France for his personal megalomaniac goals. He says Napoleon’s reputation is exaggerated.[340] French scholar Jean Tulard provided an influential account of his image as a saviour.[341] Louis Bergeron has praised the numerous changes he made to French society, especially regarding the law as well as education.[342] His greatest failure was the Russian invasion. Many historians have blamed Napoleon’s poor planning, but Russian scholars instead emphasize the Russian response, noting the notorious winter weather was just as hard on the defenders.[343]
The large and growing historiography in French, English, Russian, Spanish and other languages has been summarized and evaluated by numerous scholars.[344][345][346]
Propaganda and memory
1814 caricature of Napoleon being exiled to Elba: the ex-emperor is riding a donkey backwards while holding a broken sword.
Napoleon’s use of propaganda contributed to his rise to power, legitimated his régime, and established his image for posterity. Strict censorship, controlling various key constituents of the press, books, theatre, and art were part of his propaganda scheme, aimed at portraying him as bringing desperately wanted peace and stability to France. The propagandistic rhetoric changed in relation to events and to the atmosphere of Napoleon’s reign, focusing first on his role as a general in the army and identification as a soldier, and moving to his role as emperor and a civil leader. Specifically targeting his civilian audience, Napoleon fostered a relationship with the contemporary art community, taking an active role in commissioning and controlling different forms of art production to suit his propaganda goals.[347]
In England, Russia and across Europe—though not in France—Napoleon was a popular topic of caricature.[348][349][350]
Hazareesingh (2004) explores how Napoleon’s image and memory are best understood. They played a key role in collective political defiance of the Bourbon restoration monarchy in 1815–1830. People from different walks of life and areas of France, particularly Napoleonic veterans, drew on the Napoleonic legacy and its connections with the ideals of the 1789 Revolution.[351]
Widespread rumours of Napoleon’s return from St. Helena and Napoleon as an inspiration for patriotism, individual and collective liberties, and political mobilization manifested themselves in seditious materials, displaying the tricolor and rosettes. There were also subversive activities celebrating anniversaries of Napoleon’s life and reign and disrupting royal celebrations—they demonstrated the prevailing and successful goal of the varied supporters of Napoleon to constantly destabilize the Bourbon regime.[351]
Datta (2005) shows that, following the collapse of militaristic Boulangism in the late 1880s, the Napoleonic legend was divorced from party politics and revived in popular culture. Concentrating on two plays and two novels from the period—Victorien Sardou’s Madame Sans-Gêne (1893), Maurice Barrès’s Les Déracinés (1897), Edmond Rostand’s L’Aiglon (1900), and André de Lorde and Gyp’s Napoléonette (1913)—Datta examines how writers and critics of the Belle Époque exploited the Napoleonic legend for diverse political and cultural ends.[352]
Reduced to a minor character, the new fictional Napoleon became not a world historical figure but an intimate one, fashioned by individuals’ needs and consumed as popular entertainment. In their attempts to represent the emperor as a figure of national unity, proponents and detractors of the Third Republic used the legend as a vehicle for exploring anxieties about gender and fears about the processes of democratization that accompanied this new era of mass politics and culture.[352]
International Napoleonic Congresses take place regularly, with participation by members of the French and American military, French politicians and scholars from different countries.[353] In January 2012, the mayor of Montereau-Fault-Yonne, near Paris—the site of a late victory of Napoleon—proposed development of Napoleon’s Bivouac, a commemorative theme park at a projected cost of 200 million euros.[354]
Long-term influence outside France
Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform.[355] After the fall of Napoleon, not only was it retained by conquered countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of Italy and Germany, but it has been used as the basis of certain parts of law outside Europe including the Dominican Republic, the US state of Louisiana and the Canadian province of Quebec.[356] The code was also used as a model in many parts of Latin America.[357] The reputation of Napoleon in Poland has been favourable, especially for his support of independence, opposition to Russia, his legal code, the abolition of serfdom, and the introduction of modern middle class administration.[358]
Napoleon had an influence on the establishment of modern Germany. He caused the end of the Holy Roman Empire and helped create middle sized states such as Bavaria and Württemberg along the great powers Prussia and Austria. Although he also directly or indirectly helped to reduce the number of German states (from about 300 to fewer than 50), the middle sized states tried to prevent the unification of Germany as a federalist state. A byproduct of the French occupation was a strong development in German nationalism which eventually turned the German Confederation into the German Empire after a series of conflicts and other political developments.
Napoleon indirectly began the process of Latin American independence when he invaded Spain in 1808. The abdication of King Charles IV and renunciation of his son, Ferdinand VII created a power vacuum that was filled by native born political leaders such as Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín. Such leaders embraced nationalistic sentiments influenced by French nationalism and led successful independence movements in Latin America.[359]
Napoleon also significantly aided the United States when he agreed to sell the territory of Louisiana for 15 million dollars during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. That territory almost doubled the size of the United States, adding the equivalent of 13 states to the Union.[303]
From 1796 to 2020, at least 95 major ships were named for him. In the 21st century, at least 18 Napoleon ships are operated under the flag of France, as well as Indonesia, Germany, Italy, Australia, Argentina, India, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.[360]
Wives, mistresses, and children
Napoleon married Joséphine (née Marie Josèphe Rose Tascher de La Pagerie) in 1796, when he was 26; she was a 32-year-old widow whose first husband, Alexandre de Beauharnais, had been executed during the Reign of Terror. Five days after Alexandre de Beauharnais’ death, the Reign of Terror initiator Maximilien de Robespierre was overthrown and executed, and, with the help of high-placed friends, Joséphine was freed.[361] Until she met Bonaparte, she had been known as «Rose», a name which he disliked. He called her «Joséphine» instead, and she went by this name henceforth. Bonaparte often sent her love letters while on his campaigns.[362] He formally adopted her son Eugène and second cousin (via marriage) Stéphanie and arranged dynastic marriages for them. Joséphine had her daughter Hortense marry Napoleon’s brother Louis.[363]
Joséphine had lovers, such as Lieutenant Hippolyte Charles, during Napoleon’s Italian campaign.[364] Napoleon learnt of that affair and a letter he wrote about it was intercepted by the British and published widely, to embarrass Napoleon. Napoleon had his own affairs too: during the Egyptian campaign he took Pauline Bellisle Fourès, the wife of a junior officer, as his mistress. She became known as «Cleopatra».[k][366]
While Napoleon’s mistresses had children by him, Joséphine did not produce an heir, possibly because of either the stresses of her imprisonment during the Reign of Terror or an abortion she may have had in her twenties.[367] Napoleon chose divorce so he could remarry in search of an heir. Despite his divorce from Josephine, Napoleon showed his dedication to her for the rest of his life. When he heard the news of her death while in exile in Elba, he locked himself in his room and would not come out for two full days.[215] Her name would also be his final word on his deathbed in 1821.
On 11 March 1810 by proxy, he married the 19-year-old Marie Louise, Archduchess of Austria, and a great-niece of Marie Antoinette. Thus he had married into a German royal and imperial family.[368] Louise was less than happy with the arrangement, at least at first, stating: «Just to see the man would be the worst form of torture». Her great-aunt had been executed in France, while Napoleon had fought numerous campaigns against Austria all throughout his military career. However, she seemed to warm up to him over time. After her wedding, she wrote to her father: «He loves me very much. I respond to his love sincerely. There is something very fetching and very eager about him that is impossible to resist».[215]
Napoleon and Marie Louise remained married until his death, though she did not join him in exile on Elba and thereafter never saw her husband again. The couple had one child, Napoleon Francis Joseph Charles (1811–1832), known from birth as the King of Rome. He became Napoleon II in 1814 and reigned for only two weeks. He was awarded the title of the Duke of Reichstadt in 1818 and died of tuberculosis aged 21, with no children.[368]
Napoleon acknowledged one illegitimate son: Charles Léon (1806–1881) by Eléonore Denuelle de La Plaigne.[369] Alexandre Colonna-Walewski (1810–1868), the son of his mistress Maria Walewska, although acknowledged by Walewska’s husband, was also widely known to be his child, and the DNA of his direct male descendant has been used to help confirm Napoleon’s Y-chromosome haplotype.[370] He may have had further unacknowledged illegitimate offspring as well, such as Eugen Megerle von Mühlfeld by Emilie Victoria Kraus von Wolfsberg[371] and Hélène Napoleone Bonaparte (1816–1907) by Albine de Montholon.
Notes
- ^ , French: Napoléon Bonaparte [napɔleɔ̃ bɔnapaʁt]; Italian: Napoleone Bonaparte, [napoleˈoːne ˌbɔnaˈparte]; Corsican: Napulione Buonaparte.
- ^ French: Napoléon Ier
- ^ He established a system of public education,[7] abolished the vestiges of feudalism,[8] emancipated Jews and other religious minorities,[9] abolished the Spanish Inquisition,[10] enacted legal protections for an emerging middle class,[11] and centralized state power at the expense of religious authorities.[12]
- ^ His brother, also called Napoleon, died at birth and his sister, Maria Anna, died shortly before her first birthday. In total, two siblings died at birth and three died in infancy.
- ^ Although the 1768 Treaty of Versailles formally ceded Corsica’s rights, it remained un-incorporated during 1769[18] until it became a province of France in 1770.[19] Corsica would be legally integrated as a département in 1789.[20][21]
- ^ Aside from his name, there does not appear to be a connection between him and Napoleon’s theorem.[35]
- ^ He was mainly referred to as Bonaparte until he became First Consul for life.[40]
- ^ This is depicted in Bonaparte Crossing the Alps by Hippolyte Delaroche and in Jacques-Louis David’s imperial Napoleon Crossing the Alps. He is less realistically portrayed on a charger in the latter work.[100]
- ^ It was customary to cast a death mask of a leader. At least four genuine death masks of Napoleon are known to exist: one in The Cabildo in New Orleans, one in a Liverpool museum, another in Havana and one in the library of the University of North Carolina.[241]
- ^ The body can tolerate large doses of arsenic if ingested regularly, and arsenic was a fashionable cure-all.[248]
- ^ One night, during an illicit liaison with actress Marguerite Georges, Napoleon had a major fit. This and other more minor attacks have led historians to debate whether he had epilepsy and, if so, to what extent.[365]
Citations
- ^ «Fac-similé de l’acte de baptême de Napoléon, rédigé en italien. – Images d’Art» [Facsimile of Napoleon’s baptismal certificate, written in Italian. – Art Pictures] (in French).
- ^ a b Roberts 2014, Introduction
- ^ Charles Messenger, ed. (2001). Reader’s Guide to Military History. Routledge. pp. 391–427. ISBN 978-1-135-95970-8.
- ^ Roberts, A. (2016). Napoleon the Great. United Kingdom: Penguin Books Limited. (p. 1)
- ^ a b c Geoffrey Ellis (1997). Napoleon. Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 9781317874690.
- ^ Forrest, Alan (26 March 2015). Waterloo: Great Battles. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0199663255. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
- ^ Grab 2003, p. 56.
- ^ Broers, M. and Hicks, P.The Napoleonic Empire and the New European Political Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, p. 230
- ^ Conner, S. P. The Age of Napoleon. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004, pp. 38–40.
- ^ Perez, Joseph. The Spanish Inquisition: A History. Yale University Press, 2005, p. 98
- ^ Fremont-Barnes, G. and Fisher, T. The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Osprey Publishing, 2004, p. 336
- ^ Grab, A. Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, Conclusion
- ^ Andrew Roberts, Napoleon: A Life (2014) p. xxxiii
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 2
- ^ Gueniffey, Patrice (13 April 2015). Bonaparte. Harvard University Press. pp. 21–22. ISBN 978-0-674-42601-6.
- ^ a b Dwyer 2008a, ch 1
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. xv
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 6
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 20
- ^ «Corsica | History, Geography, & Points of Interest». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 28 November 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 142.
- ^ a b Cronin 1994, pp. 20–21
- ^ Chamberlain, Alexander (1896). The Child and Childhood in Folk Thought: (The Child in Primitive Culture), p. 385. MacMillan.
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 27
- ^ a b c International School History (8 February 2012), Napoleon’s Rise to Power, archived from the original on 8 May 2015, retrieved 29 January 2018
- ^ Johnson, Paul (2006). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-303745-3. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ a b c Roberts 2001, p. xvi
- ^ a b c Murari·Culture·, Edoardo (20 August 2019). «Italians Of The Past: Napoleon Bonaparte». Italics Magazine. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- ^ a b Roberts 2014.
- ^ a b c d Parker, Harold T. (1971). «The Formation of Napoleon’s Personality: An Exploratory Essay». French Historical Studies. 7 (1): 6–26. doi:10.2307/286104. JSTOR 286104.
- ^ Adams, Michael (2014). Napoleon and Russia. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-4212-3. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 11.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 18
- ^ Grégoire, Henri (1790). «Report on the necessity and means to annihilate the patois and to universalise the use of the French language». Wikisource (in French). Paris: French National Convention. Retrieved 16 January 2020.
[…] the number of people who speak it purely does not exceed three million; and probably the number of those who write it correctly is even fewer.
- ^ Wells 1992, p. 74
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 21
- ^ Chandler 1973, pp. 12–14.
- ^ a b Dwyer 2008a, p. 42
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 26
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 290
- ^ Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, Corsica.
- ^ Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, Revolution.
- ^ David Nicholls (1999). Napoleon: A Biographical Companion. ABC-CLIO. p. 131. ISBN 978-0-87436-957-1.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 55
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 61
- ^ a b c d e Roberts 2001, p. xviii
- ^ Roberts, Andrew (2011). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-698-17628-7.
- ^ «Napoleon I | Biography, Achievements, & Facts». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 12 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 132
- ^ Dwyer, p. 136.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 76
- ^ Patrice Gueniffey, Bonaparte: 1769–1802 (Harvard UP, 2015), pp. 137–59.
- ^ Bourrienne, Memoirs of Napoleon, p. 39
- ^ Bourrienne, Memoirs of Napoleon, p. 38
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 157
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 76, 84
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 92
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 26
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 164
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 93
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 96
- ^ Johnson 2002, p. 27
- ^ Carlyle, Thomas (1896). «The works of Thomas Carlyle – The French Revolution, vol. III, book 3.VII». Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ Englund (2010) pp. 92–94
- ^ Bell 2015, p. 29.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, pp. 284–85
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 132
- ^ Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte, Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne, pp 158.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 145
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 142
- ^ Harvey 2006, p. 179
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 135
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 306
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 305
- ^ Bell 2015, p. 30.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 322
- ^ a b c Watson 2003, pp. 13–14
- ^ Amini 2000, p. 12
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 342
- ^ Englund (2010) pp. 127–28
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 175
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 179
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 372
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 188.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 392
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, pp. 411–24
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 198.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 189
- ^ Gueniffey, Bonaparte: 1769–1802 pp. 500–02.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 442
- ^ a b c Connelly 2006, p. 57
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, pp. 205–206.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 444
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 455
- ^ François Furet, The French Revolution, 1770–1814 (1996), p. 212
- ^ Georges Lefebvre, Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799–1807 (1969), pp. 60–68
- ^ a b c d Lyons 1994, p. 111
- ^ Lefebvre, Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799–1807 (1969), pp. 71–92
- ^ Holt, Lucius Hudson; Chilton, Alexander Wheeler (1919). A Brief History of Europe from 1789–1815. Macmillan. p. 206.
August 1802 referendum napoleon.
- ^ Chandler 2002, p. 51
- ^ Chandler 1966, pp. 279–281
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 235
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 292
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 293
- ^ a b c Chandler 1966, p. 296
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, pp. 298–304
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 301
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 302
- ^ a b Lyons 1994, pp. 111–114
- ^ a b c d Lyons 1994, p. 113
- ^ Edwards 1999, p. 55
- ^ James, C. L. R. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution, [1963] (Penguin Books, 2001), pp. 141–142.
- ^ «French Emancipation». obo.
- ^ «May 10th 1802, «The last cry of innocence and despair»«. herodote (in French). Retrieved 6 December 2019.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 301.
- ^ James, C. L. R. (1963) [1938]. The Black Jacobins (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage Books. pp. 45–55. OCLC 362702.
- ^ «CHRONOLOGY-Who banned slavery when?». Reuters. Thomson Reuters. 22 March 2007. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Oldfield, Dr John (17 February 2011). «British Anti-slavery». BBC History. BBC. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Perry, James Arrogant Armies Great Military Disasters and the Generals Behind Them, (Edison: Castle Books, 2005) pp. 78–79.
- ^ Christer Petley, White Fury: A Jamaican Slaveholder and the Age of Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), p. 182.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 303.
- ^ Connelly 2006, p. 70
- ^ Mowat R B (1924). The Diplomacy Of Nepoleon.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 265
- ^ Zamoyski, pp. 338–339.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 243
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 296
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 297
- ^ De Rémusat, Claire Elisabeth, Memoirs of Madame De Rémusat, 1802–1808 Volume 1, HardPress Publishing, 2012, 542 pp., ISBN 978-1-290-51747-8.
- ^ a b c d Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, p. 355.
- ^ Dwyer, Philip (2015). «‘Citizen Emperor’: Political Ritual, Popular Sovereignty and the Coronation of Napoleon I». History. 100 (339): 40–57. doi:10.1111/1468-229X.12089. ISSN 1468-229X.
- ^ Paul W. Schroeder, The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848 (1996) pp. 231–286
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 328. Meanwhile, French territorial rearrangements in Germany occurred without Russian consultation and Napoleon’s annexations in the Po valley increasingly strained relations between the two.
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 331
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 323
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 332
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, p. 333
- ^ Michael J. Hughes, Forging Napoleon’s Grande Armée: Motivation, Military Culture, and Masculinity in the French Army, 1800–1808 (NYU Press, 2012).
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 321
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 332
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 108
- ^ Andrew Uffindell, Great Generals of the Napoleonic Wars. p. 15
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 156.
- ^ «Napoleon: Napoleon at War». www.pbs.org. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 156. «It is a historical cliché to compare the Schlieffen Plan with Hannibal’s tactical envelopment at Cannae (216 BC); Schlieffen owed more to Napoleon’s strategic maneuver on Ulm (1805)».
- ^ Glover (1967), pp. 233–252.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 407.
- ^ a b c Adrian Gilbert (2000). The Encyclopedia of Warfare: From Earliest Time to the Present Day. Taylor & Francis. p. 133. ISBN 978-1-57958-216-6. Archived from the original on 29 July 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 414
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 414
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 350
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 344
- ^ Karsh 2001, p. 12
- ^ Sicker 2001, p. 99.
- ^ Michael V. Leggiere (2015). Napoleon and Berlin: The Franco-Prussian War in North Germany, 1813. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-8061-8017-5. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016.
- ^ a b c Chandler 1966, pp. 467–468
- ^ a b c Brooks 2000, p. 110
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 497
- ^ Jacques Godechot et al. Napoleonic Era in Europe (1971) pp. 126–139
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 370
- ^ a b August Fournier (1911). Napoleon I.: A Biography. H. Holt. p. 459.
- ^ The History of Napoleon Bonaparte by John Stevens Cabot Abbott, 1882, p. 559
- ^ Roberts, pp. 458–459
- ^ a b Roberts, pp. 459–461
- ^ Horne, Alistair (1997). How Far From Austerlitz? Napoleon 1805–1815. Pan Macmillan. p. 238. ISBN 978-1-74328-540-4. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ Todd Fisher & Gregory Fremont-Barnes, The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. p. 197.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes pp. 198–199.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes p. 199.
- ^ Chandler, pp. 620
- ^ Engman, Max (2016). «Finland and the Napoleonic Empire». In Planert, Ute (ed.). Napoleon’s Empire. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 227–238. doi:10.1057/9781137455475_16. ISBN 978-1-349-56731-7 – via Springer Link.
- ^ «The Erfurt Convention 1808». Napoleon-series.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes p. 205.
- ^ Hope, John; Baird, D. (28 January 1809). «Battle of Corunna». Vol. 15, no. 4. Cobbett’s political register. pp. 91–94.
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, pp. 659–660
- ^ John Lynch, Caudillos in Spanish America 1800–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992, pp. 402–403.
- ^ a b c Fisher & Fremont-Barnes, p. 106.
- ^ Gill, pp. 44–45
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 690
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 690
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 706
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 707
- ^ a b Chandler 1973, p. 708.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 720.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 729.
- ^ «The British Expeditionary Force to Walcheren: 1809». napoleon-series.org. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
- ^ a b Todd Fisher & Gregory Fremont-Barnes, The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. p. 144.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 732.
- ^ David Watkin, The Roman Forum. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2012. 183.
ISBN 978-0-674-06367-9
books.google.com/books?id=cRrufMNLOhwC&pg=PA183 - ^ McLynn 1998, p. 378
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 495
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 507
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 506
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 504–505
- ^ Harvey 2006, p. 773
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 518
- ^ Markham 1988, p. 194
- ^ «Napoleon1812». napoleon-1812.nl. Archived from the original on 13 February 2016.
- ^ Markham 1988, pp. 190, 199
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 541
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 549
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 565
- ^ Chandler 1995, p. 1020
- ^ a b Riley, J.P. (2013). Napoleon and the World War of 1813: Lessons in Coalition Warfighting. Routledge. p. 206. ISBN 978-1-136-32135-1. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
- ^ Leggiere (2007). The Fall of Napoleon: Volume 1, The Allied Invasion of France, 1813–1814. pp. 53–54. ISBN 978-0-521-87542-4. Archived from the original on 21 September 2015.
- ^ Fremont-Barnes 2004, p. 14
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 585
- ^ Gates 2003, p. 259.
- ^ Lieven, Dominic (2010). Russia Against Napoleon: The True Story of the Campaigns of War and Peace. Penguin. pp. 484–485. ISBN 978-1-101-42938-9. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ a b Prutsch, M. (2012). Making Sense of Constitutional Monarchism in Post-Napoleonic France and Germany. Springer. pp. 10–15. ISBN 9781137291653.
- ^ A. Bell, David (2015). «5: Downfall, 1812–1815». Napoleon: A Concise Biography. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6.
- ^ «Napoleon’s act of abdication». Bulletin des lois de la Republique Française. July 1814. Archived from the original on 22 December 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 593–594
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 597
- ^ Latson, Jennifer. «Why Napoleon Probably Should Have Just Stayed in Exile the First Time». Archived from the original on 25 June 2016.
- ^ a b c «PBS – Napoleon: Napoleon and Josephine». PBS. Archived from the original on 21 August 2017.
- ^ a b c McLynn 1998, p. 604
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 605
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 607
- ^ Chesney 2006, p. 35
- ^ Cordingly 2004, p. 254
- ^ Cox, Dale (2015). Nicolls’ outpost : a War of 1812 fort at Chattahoochee, Florida. Old Kitchen Books. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-692-37936-3.
- ^ Hibbert, Christopher (2003). Napoleon’s Women. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 272. ISBN 978-0-393-32499-0. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ^ Information, Reed Business (28 October 1982). «Napoleon’s moulds». New Scientist: 257.
- ^ Schom 1997, pp. 769–70
- ^ «Two Days at Saint Helena». The Spirit of the English Magazines. Monroe and Francis: 402. 1832. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ^ Jones, David (14 October 1982). «The Singular Case of Napoleon’s Wallpaper». New Scientist: 101.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 642
- ^ «A JOURNEY TO ST. HELENA, HOME OF NAPOLEON’S LAST DAYS». Retrieved 18 March 2021.
- ^ I, Napoleon; Marchand, Louis Joseph (29 October 2017). Chronicles of Caesar’s Wars: The First-Ever Translation. Translated by Barzani, Arshan (1 ed.). Clio Books. Archived from the original on 3 December 2017.
- ^ Hicks, Peter. «Napoleon’s English Lessons». Napoleon.org. Archived from the original on 18 September 2016. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
- ^ a b Price, Munro (2014). «Epilogue: The Hundred Days». Napoleon: The End of Glory. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-19-966080-3.
- ^ a b Arnold (2011), p. 310.
- ^ «Napoleon I — Exile on St. Helena | Britannica». www.britannica.com. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ Henshaw (1870), p. 10.
- ^ Wilkins 1972
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 651
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 638–639.
- ^ a b c McLynn 1998, p. 655
- ^ Roberts, Napoleon (2014) 799–801
- ^ «Napoleon had a ‘very small’ penis according to C4 show». The Independent. 4 April 2014. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
- ^ Fulghum 2007
- ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 293–295
- ^ Driskel 1993, p. 168
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 656
- ^ Johnson 2002, pp. 180–181
- ^ a b c Cullen 2008, pp. 146–148
- ^ a b Cullen 2008, p. 156
- ^ Cullen 2008, p. 50
- ^ Cullen 2008, p. 161, and Hindmarsh et al. 2008, p. 2092
- ^ a b «L’Empire et le Saint-Siège». Napoleon.org. Archived from the original on 19 September 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2011.
- ^ Wachtel, Albert (1992). The Cracked Lookingglass: James Joyce and the Nightmare of History. Susquehanna University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-945636-27-4.
- ^ Joyce, James (2005). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Collector’s Library. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-904919-54-4.
- ^ «Napoleon’s «divorce»«. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
- ^ «catholictextbookproject.com». Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
- ^ Bledsoe, Albert Taylor; Herrick, Sophia M’Ilvaine Bledsoe (1871). «The Responsibility of Men for their Belief». The Southern review, Volume 9. p. 528. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
- ^ Confidential Correspondence of the Emperor Napoleon and the Empress Josephine: Including Letters from the Time of Their Marriage Until the Death of Josephine, and Also Several Private Letters from the Emperor to His Brother Joseph, and Other Important Personages. With Numerous Illustrative Notes … Mason Brothers. 1856. p. 359.
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and I have founded empires. But on what did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. Jesus Christ founded his empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for him
- ^ Cyclopædia of Moral and Religious Anecdote [abridged from the larger «Cyclopædia» of K. Arvine], with an introductory essay by the Rev. George Cheever. J. J. Griffin & Company. 1851. p. 58.
- ^ Cases, Emmanuel-Auguste-Dieudonné comte de Las (1855). Memoirs of the Life, Exile, and Conversations of the Emperor Napoleon. Redfield.
- ^ William Roberts, «Napoleon, the Concordat of 1801, and Its Consequences». in by Frank J. Coppa, ed., Controversial Concordats: The Vatican’s Relations with Napoleon, Mussolini, and Hitler (1999) pp. 34–80.
- ^ Nigel Aston, Religion and revolution in France, 1780–1804 (Catholic University of America Press, 2000) pp. 279–315
- ^ Nigel Aston, Christianity and revolutionary Europe, 1750–1830 (Cambridge University Press, 2002) pp. 261–62.
- ^ Luis Granados (2012). Damned Good Company. Humanist Press. pp. 182–83. ISBN 978-0-931779-24-4. Archived from the original on 22 September 2015.
- ^ a b «When Napoleon Captured the Pope». The New York Times. 13 December 1981. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
- ^ «Napoleon and the Pope: From the Concordat to the Excommunication». Archived from the original on 24 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ «Concordat Of Fontainebleau». Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
- ^ «Pius VII | pope». Archived from the original on 2 May 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2017.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 436
- ^ a b Green, David B. (9 February 2014). «This Day in Jewish History / The Sanhedrin of Paris Convenes at the Behest of Napoleon». Haaretz. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
- ^ Schwarzfuchs 1979, p. 50
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 315
- ^ «Napoleon Bonaparte». A few famous freemasons. Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon A.F. & A. M. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
- ^ Pieter Geyl, Napoleon, For and Against (1982)
- ^ George F.E. Rudé (1988). The French Revolution. Grove Weidenfeld. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-8021-3272-7. Archived from the original on 26 September 2015.
- ^ Jack Coggins (1966). Soldiers And Warriors: An Illustrated History. Courier Dover Publications. p. 187. ISBN 978-0-486-45257-9.
- ^ Sally Waller (2002). France in Revolution, 1776–1830. Heinemann. p. 188. ISBN 978-0-435-32732-3.
- ^ See David Chandler, «General Introduction» to his The Campaigns of Napoleon: The Mind and Method of History’s Greatest Soldier (1975).
- ^ Price, Munro (2014). «1: Napoleon and his Empire, December 1812». Napoleon: The End of Glory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-19-966080-3.
- ^ Roberts, Napoleon: A Life (2014) pp. 470–73
- ^ Gregory R. Copley (2007). The Art of Victory: Strategies for Personal Success and Global Survival in a Changing World. Simon and Schuster. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-4165-2478-6.
- ^ Dwyer 2013, pp. 175–76
- ^ Ellis, Geoffrey (16 May 2003). The Napoleonic Empire. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 125. ISBN 978-1-4039-4401-6.
- ^ J. M. Thompson, Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall (1954), p. 285
- ^ Christopher Hibbert (1999). Wellington: A Personal History. Da Capo Press. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-7382-0148-1.
- ^ Steven Englund, Napoleon: A Political Life (2004), pp. 379ff
- ^ van Crevald, Martin (1987). Command in War. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-674-14441-5.
- ^ «Napoleon Bonaparte (Character)». Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 18 November 2017. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ Bell 2007, p. 13
- ^ «Most Popular Napoleon Bonaparte Movies and TV Shows». Internet Movie Database. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ The German original, der größte Meister des Machiavellismus, means «the greatest master of Machiavellism» but is mistranslated and misspelled with capitalization as «the greatest Maestro of Machiavellism» in Bourke, Skinner, Richard, Quentin; Kelly, Duncan (2016). «11: Popular sovereignty as state theory in the nineteenth century». Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. University Printing House, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 280–281. ISBN 978-1-107-13040-1.
- ^ The Fortnightly, Volume 114. Chapman and Hall, 1923. p. 836.
- ^ Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne. «Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte.» Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1889. Vol. 1, p. 7.
- ^ Kircheisen, F. M. Napoleon New York : Harcourt, Brace, 1932
- ^ Davydov, Denis. In the Service of the Tsar Against Napoleon: The Memoirs of Denis Davydov, 1806–1814. Translation by Gregory Troubetzkoy. Greenhill Books, 1999. p. 64.
- ^ «Greatest cartooning coup of all time: The Brit who convinced everyone Napoleon was short». National Post. 28 April 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2017.
- ^ Roberts 2004, p. 93
- ^ «Was Napoleon Short? | Britannica». www.britannica.com. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ a b c Owen Connelly (2006). Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military Campaigns. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- ^ «The Myth of Napoleon’s Height: How a Single Image Can Change History». Entity. 13 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 January 2018. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
- ^ Seward, Desmond. Napoleon’s Family. New York: Viking, 1986.
- ^ The Bookman, Vol. 29, p. 304. Diary of Capt. Ross, commander of the Northumberland.
- ^ Bordes 2007, p. 118.
- ^ Hall 2006, p. 181
- ^ a b McGraw-Hill’s, US History 2012, pp. 112–13[clarification needed]
- ^ Blaufarb 2007, pp. 101–02
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 255
- ^ Bernard Schwartz (1998). The Code Napoleon and the Common-law World. The Lawbook Exchange. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-886363-59-5. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
- ^ Wood 2007, p. 55
- ^ Scheck 2008, Chapter: The Road to National Unification
- ^ Astarita 2005, p. 264
- ^ Alter 2006, pp. 61–76
- ^ Robert R. Palmer and Joel Colton, A History of the Modern World (New York: McGraw Hill, 1995), pp. 428–29
- ^ a b Archer et al. 2002, p. 397
- ^ Flynn 2001, p. 16
- ^ McConachy, Bruce (2001). «The Roots of Artillery Doctrine: Napoleonic Artillery Tactics Reconsidered» (PDF). The Journal of Military History. 65 (3): 617–640. doi:10.2307/2677528. JSTOR 2677528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2012.
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 383
- ^ John Shy, «Jomini» in Peter Paret, ed. Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (1986).
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 380
- ^ Roberts 2001, p. 272
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 404
- ^ Hallock, William; Wade, Herbert T (1906). «Outlines of the evolution of weights and measures and the metric system». London: The Macmillan Company. pp. 66–69.
- ^ Denis Février. «Un historique du mètre» (in French). Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie. Archived from the original on 28 February 2011. Retrieved 10 March 2011.
- ^ Thierry Sabot (1 October 2000). «Les poids et mesures sous l’Ancien Régime» [The weights and measures of the Ancien Régime] (in French). histoire-genealogie. Archived from the original on 5 December 2010. Retrieved 10 February 2011.
- ^ O’Connor 2003
- ^ Clive Emsley (2014). Napoleon: Conquest, Reform and Reorganisation. Routledge. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-317-61028-1. Archived from the original on 18 October 2015.
- ^ a b Williams, L. Pearce (1956). «Science, Education and Napoleon I». Isis. 47 (4): 369–382. doi:10.1086/348507. JSTOR 226629. S2CID 144112149.
- ^ Margaret Bradley, «Scientific education versus military training: the influence of Napoleon Bonaparte on the École Polytechnique». Annals of science (1975) 32#5 pp. 415–49.
- ^ Roberts 2014, pp. 278–81
- ^ Hastings, Max (31 October 2014). «Everything is Owed to Glory». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 13 November 2014.
- ^ Charles Esdaile, Napoleon’s Wars: An International History 1803–1815 (2008), p. 39
- ^ Colin S. Gray (2007). War, Peace and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History. Routledge. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-134-16951-1. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 666
- ^ Repa, Jan (2 December 2005). «Furore over Austerlitz ceremony». BBC. Archived from the original on 20 April 2010. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
- ^ Bourke, Skinner, Richard, Quentin; Garstan, Bryan (2016). «10: From popular sovereignty to civil society in post-revolutionary France». Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. University Printing House, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 254–255, 258–259. ISBN 978-1-107-13040-1.
- ^ Poulos 2000
- ^ Geyl 1947
- ^ Dwyer 2008b
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. xliii.
- ^ Hanson 2003
- ^ Cronin 1994, pp. 342–43
- ^ Correlli Barnett, Bonaparte (1978)
- ^ Jean Tulard, Napoleon: The Myth of the Saviour (1984)
- ^ Bergeron, Louis (1981). France Under Napoleon. Princeton U.P. ISBN 978-0-691-00789-2.
- ^ Dominic Lieven, «Review article: Russia and the defeat of Napoleon.» Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History (2006) 7#2 pp. 283–308.
- ^ Robert S. Alexander, Napoleon (Oxford University Press, 2001), examines major debates among historians.
- ^ Western Society for French History (1974). Proceedings of the … Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History. Issues for have subtitle:Selected papers of the … Annual Meeting. Las Cruces, N.M.: New Mexico State University Press.
- ^ John Dunne, «Recent Napoleonic Historiography: ‘Poor Relation’ Makes Good?» French History (2004) 18#4 pp. 484–91.
- ^ Alan Forrest, «Propaganda and the Legitimation of Power in Napoleonic France». French History, 2004 18(4): 426–45
- ^ Richardson, Hubert N. B. (1920). A dictionary of Napoleon and his times. University of California Libraries. London, New York [etc.] : Cassell and company, ltd.
- ^ Mark, Bryant, «Broadsides against Boney.» History Today 60.1 (2010): 52+
- ^ Mark Bryant, Napoleonic Wars in Cartoons (Grub Street, 2009).
- ^ a b Sudhir Hazareesingh, «Memory and Political Imagination: the Legend of Napoleon Revisited». French History, 2004 18(4): 463–83
- ^ a b Venita Datta, «‘L’appel Au Soldat’: Visions of the Napoleonic Legend in Popular Culture of the Belle Epoque». French Historical Studies 2005 28(1): 1–30
- ^ «Call for Papers: International Napoleonic Society, Fourth International Napoleonic Congress». La Fondation Napoléon. Archived from the original on 8 January 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2008.
- ^ Laurent, Ottavi (8 February 2012). «A New Napoleonic Campaign for Montereau». Foundation Napoleon. Archived from the original on 29 September 2013.
- ^ Grab 2003, country by country analysis
- ^ «Napoleonic Code». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 29 December 2011. Retrieved 13 April 2012.
- ^ Lobingier, Charles Sumner (December 1918). «Napoleon and His Code». Harvard Law Review. 32 (2): 114–134. doi:10.2307/1327640. ISSN 0017-811X. JSTOR 1327640.
- ^ Andrzej Nieuwazny, «Napoleon and Polish identity». History Today, May 1998 vol. 48 no. 5 pp. 50–55
- ^ «The Crisis of 1808». www.brown.edu. Brown University. Retrieved 6 May 2021.
- ^ «Яндекс». yandex.ru. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ «Biography of Joesephine de Beauharnais». Archived from the original on 28 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 117
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 271
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 118
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 284
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 188
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 100
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 663
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 630
- ^ Lucotte, Gérard; Macé, Jacques & Hrechdakian, Peter (September 2013). «Reconstruction of the Lineage Y Chromosome Haplotype of Napoléon the First» (PDF). International Journal of Sciences. 2 (9): 127–39. ISSN 2305-3925. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 April 2014.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 423
References
Biographical studies
- Abbott, John (2005). Life of Napoleon Bonaparte. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4179-7063-6.
- Bell, David A. (2015). Napoleon: A Concise Biography. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6. only 140pp; by a scholar
- Blaufarb, Rafe (2007). Napoleon: Symbol for an Age, A Brief History with Documents. Bedford. ISBN 978-0-312-43110-5.
- Broers, Michael (2015). Napoleon: Soldier of Destiny. Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0571273454.
- Chandler, David (2002). Napoleon. Leo Cooper. ISBN 978-0-85052-750-6.
- Cronin, Vincent (1994). Napoleon. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-637521-0.
- Dwyer, Philip (2008a). Napoleon: The Path to Power. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300137545.
- Dwyer, Philip (2013). Citizen Emperor: Napoleon in Power. Yale University Press. ASIN B00GGSG3W4.
- Englund, Steven (2010). Napoleon: A Political Life. Scribner. ISBN 978-0-674-01803-7.
- Gueniffey, Patrice. Bonaparte: 1769–1802 (Harvard UP, 2015, French edition 2013); 1008 pp.; vol 1 of most comprehensive recent scholarly biography by leading French specialist; less emphasis on battles and campaigns excerpt; also online review
- Johnson, Paul (2002). Napoleon: A life. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-670-03078-1.; 200 pp.; quite hostile
- Lefebvre, Georges (1969). Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit, 1799–1807. Columbia University Press. influential wide-ranging history
- Lefebvre, Georges (1969). Napoleon: from Tilsit to Waterloo, 1807–1815. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231033138.
- Lyons, Martyn (1994). Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. St. Martin’s Press.
- Markham, Felix (1963). Napoleon. Mentor.; 303 pp.; short biography by an Oxford scholar online
- McLynn, Frank (1998). Napoleon. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-6247-5. ASIN 0712662472.
- Roberts, Andrew (2014). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group. ISBN 978-0-670-02532-9.
- Thompson, J.M. (1951). Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall. Oxford U.P., 412 pp.; by an Oxford scholar
- Zamoyski, Adam (2018). Napoleon: The Man Behind The Myth. Great Britain: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-811607-1.
Primary sources
- Babelon, Jean-Pierre, D’Huart, Suzanne and De Jonge, Alex. Napoleon’s Last Will and Testament. Paddington Press Ltd. New York & London. 1977. ISBN 0-448-22190-X.
- Broadley, A. M., and J. Holland Rose. Napoleon in caricature 1795–1821 (John Lane, 1911) online, illustrated
- Gourgaud, Gaspard (1903) [1899]. Talks of Napoleon at St. Helena. Translated from the French by Elizabeth Wormeley Latimer. Chicago: A.C. McClurg.
Historiography and memory
- Broadley, Alexander Meyrick (1911). Napoleon in Caricature 1795-1821. John Lane, 1911 Caricature.
- Dwyer, Philip G. (2004). «Napoleon Bonaparte as Hero and Saviour: Image, Rhetoric and Behaviour in the Construction of a Legend». French History. 18 (4): 379–403. doi:10.1093/fh/18.4.379.
- Dwyer, Philip (2008b). «Remembering and Forgetting in Contemporary France: Napoleon, Slavery, and the French History Wars». French Politics, Culture & Society. 26 (3): 110–22. doi:10.3167/fpcs.2008.260306.
- Englund, Steven. «Napoleon and Hitler». Journal of the Historical Society (2006) 6#1 pp. 151–69.
- Geyl, Pieter (1982) [1947]. Napoleon For and Against. Penguin Books.
- Hanson, Victor Davis (2003). «The Claremont Institute: The Little Tyrant, A review of Napoleon: A Penguin Life«. The Claremont Institute.
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir (2005). The Legend of Napoleon. excerpt and text search
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir. «Memory and Political Imagination: The Legend of Napoleon Revisited», French History (2004) 18#4 pp. 463–83.
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir (2005). «Napoleonic Memory in Nineteenth-Century France: The Making of a Liberal Legend». MLN. 120 (4): 747–73. doi:10.1353/mln.2005.0119. S2CID 154508777.
- Porterfield, Todd, and Susan Siegfried. Staging Empire: Napoleon, Ingres, and David (Penn State Press, 2006). online review.
Specialty studies
- Alder, Ken (2002). The Measure of All Things – The Seven-Year Odyssey and Hidden Error That Transformed the World. Free Press. ISBN 978-0-7432-1675-3.
- Alter, Peter (2006). T. C. W. Blanning and Hagen Schulze (ed.). Unity and Diversity in European Culture c. 1800. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-726382-2.
- Amini, Iradj (2000). Napoleon and Persia. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-934211-58-1.
- Archer, Christon I.; Ferris, John R.; Herwig, Holger H. (2002). World History of Warfare. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-4423-8.
- Astarita, Tommaso (2005). Between Salt Water And Holy Water: A History Of Southern Italy. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-05864-2.
- Bell, David (2007). The First Total War. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-618-34965-4.
- Bordes, Philippe (2007). Jacques-Louis David. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12346-3.
- Brooks, Richard (2000). Atlas of World Military History. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-7607-2025-7.
- Chandler, David (1966). The Campaigns of Napoleon. New York: Scribner. ISBN 978-0-02-523660-8. OCLC 740560411.
- Chandler, David (1973) [1966]. Napoleon. ISBN 978-0841502543.
- Chesney, Charles (2006). Waterloo Lectures:A Study Of The Campaign Of 1815. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4286-4988-0.
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2018). Napoleon’s 1796 Italian Campaign. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2676-2
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2020). Napoleon Absent, Coalition Ascendant: The 1799 Campaign in Italy and Switzerland, Volume 1. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-3025-7
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2021). The Coalition Crumbles, Napoleon Returns: The 1799 Campaign in Italy and Switzerland, Volume 2. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-3034-9
- Connelly, Owen (2006). Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military Campaigns. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- Cordingly, David (2004). The Billy Ruffian: The Bellerophon and the Downfall of Napoleon. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-58234-468-3.
- Cullen, William (2008). Is Arsenic an Aphrodisiac?. Royal Society of Chemistry. ISBN 978-0-85404-363-7.
- Dobi.A. 1974. “For the Emperor-Bibliophile, Only the Very Best.” Wilson Library Bulletin 49 (November): 229–33.
- Driskel, Paul (1993). As Befits a Legend. Kent State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87338-484-1.
- Esdaile, Charles J. (2003). The Peninsular War: A New History. Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-6231-7.
- Flynn, George Q. (2001). Conscription and democracy: The Draft in France, Great Britain, and the United States. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-31912-9.
- Fremont-Barnes, Gregory; Fisher, Todd (2004). The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-831-1.
- Fulghum, Neil (2007). «Death Mask of Napoleon». University of North Carolina. Archived from the original on 26 July 2013. Retrieved 4 August 2008.
- Gates, David (2001). The Spanish Ulcer: A History of the Peninsular War. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-81083-1.
- Gates, David (2003). The Napoleonic Wars, 1803–1815. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-0719-3.
- Gill, John H. (2014). 1809: Thunder on the Danube – Napoleon’s Defeat of the Habsburgs, Vol. 1. London: Frontline Books. ISBN 978-184415-713-6.
- Glover, Richard (1967). «The French Fleet, 1807–1814; Britain’s Problem; and Madison’s Opportunity». The Journal of Modern History. 39 (3): 233–52. doi:10.1086/240080. S2CID 143376566.
- Godechot, Jacques; et al. (1971). The Napoleonic era in Europe. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN 978-0-03-084166-8.
- Grab, Alexander (2003). Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-68275-3.
- Hall, Stephen (2006). Size Matters. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-618-47040-2.
- Harvey, Robert (2006). The War of Wars. Robinson. ISBN 978-1-84529-635-3.
- Hindmarsh, J. Thomas; Savory, John (2008). «The Death of Napoleon, Cancer or Arsenic?». Clinical Chemistry. 54 (12): 2092. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.117358. Archived from the original on 26 December 2010. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
- Karsh, Inari (2001). Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East, 1789–1923. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-00541-9.
- Mowat, R.B. (1924) The Diplomacy of Napoleon (1924) 350 pp. online
- O’Connor, J; Robertson, E F (2003). «The history of measurement». St Andrew’s University. Retrieved 18 July 2008.
- Poulos, Anthi (2000). «1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict». International Journal of Legal Information (vol 28 ed.). 28: 1–44. doi:10.1017/S0731126500008842. S2CID 159202400.
- Richardson, Hubert N.B. A Dictionary of Napoleon and His Times (1921) online free 489pp
- Roberts, Chris (2004). Heavy Words Lightly Thrown. Granta. ISBN 978-1-86207-765-2.
- Schom, Alan (1997). Napoleon Bonaparte. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-017214-5.
- Schroeder, Paul W. (1996). The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848. Oxford U.P. pp. 177–560. ISBN 978-0-19-820654-5. advanced diplomatic history of Napoleon and his era
- Schwarzfuchs, Simon (1979). Napoleon, the Jews and the Sanhedrin. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-19-710023-3.
- Watson, William (2003). Tricolor and crescent. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-275-97470-1. Retrieved 12 June 2009.
- Sicker, Martin (2001). The Islamic World in Decline: From the Treaty of Karlowitz to the Disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. Greenwood. p. 99. ISBN 978-0-275-96891-5.
- Wells, David (1992). The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-011813-1.
External links
- The Napoleonic Guide
- Napoleon Series
- International Napoleonic Society
- Biography by the US Public Broadcasting Service
- Works by Napoleon at Project Gutenberg
- Hit the road with Napoleon
- Rose, John Holland (1911). «Napoleon I.» . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 19 (11th ed.). pp. 190–211.
Napoleon | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries, by Jacques-Louis David, 1812 |
||||
Emperor of the French
(more…) |
||||
1st reign | 18 May 1804 – 6 April 1814 | |||
Coronation | 2 December 1804 Notre-Dame Cathedral |
|||
Successor | Louis XVIII (as King of France) |
|||
2nd reign | 20 March 1815 – 22 June 1815 | |||
Predecessor | Louis XVIII | |||
Successor | Napoleon II (disputed) or Louis XVIII | |||
King of Italy | ||||
Reign | 17 March 1805 – 11 April 1814 | |||
Coronation | 26 May 1805 Milan Cathedral |
|||
First Consul of France | ||||
In office 12 December 1799 – 18 May 1804 |
||||
Co-Consuls | Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès Charles-François Lebrun |
|||
Provisional Consul of France | ||||
In office 10 November 1799 – 12 December 1799 |
||||
Co-Consuls | Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès Roger Ducos |
|||
President of the Italian Republic | ||||
In office 26 January 1802 – 17 March 1805 |
||||
Vice President | Francesco Melzi d’Eril | |||
Protector of the Confederation of the Rhine | ||||
In office 12 July 1806 – 4 November 1813 |
||||
Prince-Primates | Karl von Dalberg Eugène de Beauharnais |
|||
Born | Napoleone Buonaparte[1] 15 August 1769 Ajaccio, Corsica, Kingdom of France |
|||
Died | 5 May 1821 (aged 51) Longwood, Saint Helena, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland |
|||
Burial | 15 December 1840
Les Invalides, Paris, France |
|||
Spouse |
Joséphine de Beauharnais (m. ; div. ) Marie Louise of Austria (m. ; separated 1814) |
|||
Issue Detail |
|
|||
|
||||
House | Bonaparte | |||
Father | Carlo Buonaparte | |||
Mother | Letizia Ramolino | |||
Signature |
Rescale the fullscreen map to see Saint Helena
Napoleon Bonaparte[a] (born Napoleone Buonaparte; 15 August 1769 – 5 May 1821), later known by his regnal name Napoleon I,[b] was a French military commander and political leader who rose to prominence during the French Revolution and led successful campaigns during the Revolutionary Wars. He was the de facto leader of the French Republic as First Consul from 1799 to 1804, then Emperor of the French from 1804 until 1814 and again in 1815. Napoleon’s political and cultural legacy endures to this day, as a highly celebrated and controversial leader. He initiated many liberal reforms that have persisted in society, and is considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His wars and campaigns are studied by militaries all over the world. Between three and six million civilians and soldiers perished in what became known as the Napoleonic Wars.[2][3]
Napoleon was born on the island of Corsica, not long after its annexation by France, to a native family descending from minor Italian nobility.[4][5] He supported the French Revolution in 1789 while serving in the French army, and tried to spread its ideals to his native Corsica. He rose rapidly in the Army after he saved the governing French Directory by firing on royalist insurgents. In 1796, he began a military campaign against the Austrians and their Italian allies, scoring decisive victories and becoming a national hero. Two years later, he led a military expedition to Egypt that served as a springboard to political power. He engineered a coup in November 1799 and became First Consul of the Republic.
Differences with the United Kingdom meant France faced the War of the Third Coalition by 1805. Napoleon shattered this coalition with victories in the Ulm campaign, and at the Battle of Austerlitz, which led to the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire. In 1806, the Fourth Coalition took up arms against him. Napoleon defeated Prussia at the battles of Jena and Auerstedt, marched the Grande Armée into Eastern Europe, and defeated the Russians in June 1807 at Friedland, forcing the defeated nations of the Fourth Coalition to accept the Treaties of Tilsit. Two years later, the Austrians challenged the French again during the War of the Fifth Coalition, but Napoleon solidified his grip over Europe after triumphing at the Battle of Wagram.
Hoping to extend the Continental System, his embargo against Britain, Napoleon invaded the Iberian Peninsula and declared his brother Joseph the King of Spain in 1808. The Spanish and the Portuguese revolted in the Peninsular War aided by a British army, culminating in defeat for Napoleon’s marshals. Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia in the summer of 1812. The resulting campaign witnessed the catastrophic retreat of Napoleon’s Grande Armée. In 1813, Prussia and Austria joined Russian forces in a Sixth Coalition against France, resulting in a large coalition army defeating Napoleon at the Battle of Leipzig. The coalition invaded France and captured Paris, forcing Napoleon to abdicate in April 1814. He was exiled to the island of Elba, between Corsica and Italy. In France, the Bourbons were restored to power.
Napoleon escaped in February 1815 and took control of France.[6] The Allies responded by forming a Seventh Coalition, which defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. The British exiled him to the remote island of Saint Helena in the Atlantic, where he died in 1821 at the age of 51.
Napoleon had an extensive impact on the modern world, bringing liberal reforms to the lands he conquered, especially the regions of the Low Countries, Switzerland and parts of modern Italy and Germany. He implemented many liberal policies in France and Western Europe.[c] British historian Andrew Roberts summarizes these ideas as follows:
The ideas that underpin our modern world—meritocracy, equality before the law, property rights, religious toleration, modern secular education, sound finances, and so on—were championed, consolidated, codified and geographically extended by Napoleon. To them he added a rational and efficient local administration, an end to rural banditry, the encouragement of science and the arts, the abolition of feudalism and the greatest codification of laws since the fall of the Roman Empire.[13]
Early life
Napoleon’s family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family who emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a minor Genoese noble family.[14] The Buonapartes were also the relatives, by marriage and by birth, of the Pietrasentas, Costas, Paraviccinis, and Bonellis, all Corsican families of the interior.[15] His parents Carlo Maria di Buonaparte and Maria Letizia Ramolino maintained an ancestral home called «Casa Buonaparte» in Ajaccio. Napoleon was born there on 15 August 1769. He was the fourth child and third son of the family.[d] He had an elder brother, Joseph, and younger siblings Lucien, Elisa, Louis, Pauline, Caroline, and Jérôme. Napoleon was baptised as a Catholic, under the name Napoleone.[16] In his youth, his name was also spelled as Nabulione, Nabulio, Napolionne, and Napulione.[17]
Napoleon was born in the same year that the Republic of Genoa (former Italian state) ceded the region of Corsica to France.[18] The state sold sovereign rights a year before his birth and the island was conquered by France during the year of his birth. It was formally incorporated as a province in 1770, after 500 years under Genoese rule and 14 years of independence.[e] Napoleon’s parents joined the Corsican resistance and fought against the French to maintain independence, even when Maria was pregnant with him. His father Carlo was an attorney who had supported and actively collaborated with patriot Pasquale Paoli during the Corsican war of independence against France;[5] after the Corsican defeat at Ponte Novu in 1769 and Paoli’s exile in Britain, Carlo began working for the new French government and went on to be named representative of the island to the court of Louis XVI in 1777.[5][22]
The dominant influence of Napoleon’s childhood was his mother, whose firm discipline restrained a rambunctious child.[22] Later in life, Napoleon stated, «The future destiny of the child is always the work of the mother.»[23] Napoleon’s maternal grandmother had married into the Swiss Fesch family in her second marriage, and Napoleon’s uncle, the cardinal Joseph Fesch, would fulfill a role as protector of the Bonaparte family for some years. Napoleon’s noble, moderately affluent background afforded him greater opportunities to study than were available to a typical Corsican of the time.[24]
Statue of Napoleon as a schoolboy in Brienne, aged 15, by Louis Rochet [fr] (1853)
When he turned 9 years old,[25][26] he moved to the French mainland and enrolled at a religious school in Autun in January 1779. In May, he transferred with a scholarship to a military academy at Brienne-le-Château.[27] In his youth he was an outspoken Corsican nationalist and supported the state’s independence from France.[25][28] Like many Corsicans, Napoleon spoke and read Corsican (as his mother tongue) and Italian (as the official language of Corsica).[29][30][31][28] He began learning French in school at around age 10.[32] Although he became fluent in French, he spoke with a distinctive Corsican accent and never learned how to spell correctly in French.[33] Consequently, Napoleon was treated unfairly by his schoolmates.[28] He was, however, not an isolated case, as it was estimated in 1790 that fewer than 3 million people, out of France’s population of 28 million, were able to speak standard French, and those who could write it were even fewer.[34]
Napoleon was routinely bullied by his peers for his accent, birthplace, short stature, mannerisms and inability to speak French quickly.[30] He became reserved and melancholy, applying himself to reading. An examiner observed that Napoleon «has always been distinguished for his application in mathematics. He is fairly well acquainted with history and geography … This boy would make an excellent sailor».[f][36]
One story told of Napoleon at the school is that he led junior students to victory against senior students in a snowball fight, showing his leadership abilities.[37] In early adulthood, Napoleon briefly intended to become a writer; he authored a history of Corsica and a romantic novella.[25]
On completion of his studies at Brienne in 1784, Napoleon was admitted to the École Militaire in Paris. He trained to become an artillery officer and, when his father’s death reduced his income, was forced to complete the two-year course in one year.[38] He was the first Corsican to graduate from the École Militaire.[38] He was examined by the famed scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace.[39]
Early career
Upon graduating in September 1785, Bonaparte was commissioned a second lieutenant in La Fère artillery regiment.[g][27] He served in Valence and Auxonne until after the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789. Bonaparte was a fervent Corsican nationalist during this period.[41] He asked for leave to join his mentor Pasquale Paoli, when Paoli was allowed to return to Corsica by the National Assembly. Paoli had no sympathy for Napoleon, however, as he deemed his father a traitor for having deserted his cause for Corsican independence.[42]
He spent the early years of the Revolution in Corsica, fighting in a complex three-way struggle among royalists, revolutionaries, and Corsican nationalists. Napoleon came to embrace the ideals of the Revolution, becoming a supporter of the Jacobins and joining the pro-French Corsican Republicans who opposed Paoli’s policy and his aspirations of secession.[43] He was given command over a battalion of volunteers and was promoted to captain in the regular army in July 1792, despite exceeding his leave of absence and leading a riot against French troops.[44]
When Corsica declared formal secession from France and requested the protection of the British government, Napoleon and his commitment to the French Revolution came into conflict with Paoli, who had decided to sabotage the Corsican contribution to the Expédition de Sardaigne, by preventing a French assault on the Sardinian island of La Maddalena.[45] Bonaparte and his family were compelled to flee to Toulon on the French mainland in June 1793 because of the split with Paoli.[46]
Although he was born «Napoleone Buonaparte», it was after this that Napoleon began styling himself «Napoléon Bonaparte». His family did not drop the name Buonaparte until 1796. The first known record of him signing his name as Bonaparte was at the age of 27 (in 1796).[47][16][48]
Siege of Toulon
In July 1793, Bonaparte published a pro-republican pamphlet entitled Le souper de Beaucaire (Supper at Beaucaire) which gained him the support of Augustin Robespierre, the younger brother of the Revolutionary leader Maximilien Robespierre. With the help of his fellow Corsican Antoine Christophe Saliceti, Bonaparte was appointed senior gunner and artillery commander of the republican forces which arrived on 8 September at Toulon.[49][50]
He adopted a plan to capture a hill where republican guns could dominate the city’s harbour and force the British to evacuate. The assault on the position led to the capture of the city, and during it Bonaparte was wounded in the thigh on 16 December. Catching the attention of the Committee of Public Safety, he was put in charge of the artillery of France’s Army of Italy.[51] On 22 December he was on his way to his new post in Nice, promoted from the rank of colonel to brigadier general at the age of 24. He devised plans for attacking the Kingdom of Sardinia as part of France’s campaign against the First Coalition.
The French army carried out Bonaparte’s plan in the Battle of Saorgio in April 1794, and then advanced to seize Ormea in the mountains. From Ormea, they headed west to outflank the Austro-Sardinian positions around Saorge. After this campaign, Augustin Robespierre sent Bonaparte on a mission to the Republic of Genoa to determine that country’s intentions towards France.[52]
13 Vendémiaire
Some contemporaries alleged that Bonaparte was put under house arrest at Nice for his association with the Robespierres following their fall in the Thermidorian Reaction in July 1794. Napoleon’s secretary Bourrienne disputed the allegation in his memoirs. According to Bourrienne, jealousy was responsible, between the Army of the Alps and the Army of Italy, with whom Napoleon was seconded at the time.[53] Bonaparte dispatched an impassioned defence in a letter to the commissar Saliceti, and he was acquitted of any wrongdoing.[54] He was released within two weeks (on 20 August) and due to his technical skills, was asked to draw up plans to attack Italian positions in the context of France’s war with Austria. He also took part in an expedition to take back Corsica from the British, but the French were repulsed by the British Royal Navy.[55]
By 1795, Bonaparte had become engaged to Désirée Clary, daughter of François Clary. Désirée’s sister Julie Clary had married Bonaparte’s elder brother Joseph.[56] In April 1795, he was assigned to the Army of the West, which was engaged in the War in the Vendée—a civil war and royalist counter-revolution in Vendée, a region in west-central France on the Atlantic Ocean. As an infantry command, it was a demotion from artillery general—for which the army already had a full quota—and he pleaded poor health to avoid the posting.[57]
He was moved to the Bureau of Topography of the Committee of Public Safety. He sought unsuccessfully to be transferred to Constantinople in order to offer his services to the Sultan.[58] During this period, he wrote the romantic novella Clisson et Eugénie, about a soldier and his lover, in a clear parallel to Bonaparte’s own relationship with Désirée.[59] On 15 September, Bonaparte was removed from the list of generals in regular service for his refusal to serve in the Vendée campaign. He faced a difficult financial situation and reduced career prospects.[60]
On 3 October, royalists in Paris declared a rebellion against the National Convention.[61] Paul Barras, a leader of the Thermidorian Reaction, knew of Bonaparte’s military exploits at Toulon and gave him command of the improvised forces in defence of the convention in the Tuileries Palace. Napoleon had seen the massacre of the King’s Swiss Guard there three years earlier and realized that artillery would be the key to its defence.[27]
He ordered a young cavalry officer named Joachim Murat to seize large cannons and used them to repel the attackers on 5 October 1795—13 Vendémiaire An IV in the French Republican Calendar. 1,400 royalists died and the rest fled.[61] He cleared the streets with «a whiff of grapeshot», according to 19th-century historian Thomas Carlyle in The French Revolution: A History.[62][63]
The defeat of the royalist insurrection extinguished the threat to the Convention and earned Bonaparte sudden fame, wealth, and the patronage of the new government, the Directory. Murat married one of Napoleon’s sisters, becoming his brother-in-law; he also served under Napoleon as one of his generals. Bonaparte was promoted to Commander of the Interior and given command of the Army of Italy.[46]
Within weeks, he was romantically involved with Joséphine de Beauharnais, the former mistress of Barras. The couple married on 9 March 1796 in a civil ceremony.[64]
First Italian campaign
Two days after the marriage, Bonaparte left Paris to take command of the Army of Italy. He immediately went on the offensive, hoping to defeat the forces of Piedmont before their Austrian allies could intervene. In a series of rapid victories during the Montenotte Campaign, he knocked Piedmont out of the war in two weeks. The French then focused on the Austrians for the remainder of the war, the highlight of which became the protracted struggle for Mantua. The Austrians launched a series of offensives against the French to break the siege, but Napoleon defeated every relief effort, scoring victories at the battles of Castiglione, Bassano, Arcole, and Rivoli. The decisive French triumph at Rivoli in January 1797 led to the collapse of the Austrian position in Italy. At Rivoli, the Austrians lost up to 14,000 men while the French lost about 5,000.[65]
The next phase of the campaign featured the French invasion of the Habsburg heartlands. French forces in Southern Germany had been defeated by the Archduke Charles in 1796, but the Archduke withdrew his forces to protect Vienna after learning about Napoleon’s assault. In the first encounter between the two commanders, Napoleon pushed back his opponent and advanced deep into Austrian territory after winning at the Battle of Tarvis in March 1797. The Austrians were alarmed by the French thrust that reached all the way to Leoben, about 100 km from Vienna, and decided to sue for peace.[66]
The Treaty of Leoben, followed by the more comprehensive Treaty of Campo Formio, gave France control of most of northern Italy and the Low Countries, and a secret clause promised the Republic of Venice to Austria. Bonaparte marched on Venice and forced its surrender, ending 1,100 years of Venetian independence. He authorized the French to loot treasures such as the Horses of Saint Mark.[67]
On the journey, Bonaparte conversed much about the warriors of antiquity, especially Alexander, Caesar, Scipio and Hannibal. He studied their strategy and combined it with his own. In a question from Bourrienne, asking whether he gave his preference to Alexander or Caesar, Napoleon said that he places Alexander the Great in the first rank, the main reason being his campaign in Asia.[68]
Bonaparte during the Italian campaign in 1797
His application of conventional military ideas to real-world situations enabled his military triumphs, such as creative use of artillery as a mobile force to support his infantry. He stated later in life:[when?] «I have fought sixty battles and I have learned nothing which I did not know at the beginning. Look at Caesar; he fought the first like the last».[69]
Bonaparte could win battles by concealment of troop deployments and concentration of his forces on the «hinge» of an enemy’s weakened front. If he could not use his favourite envelopment strategy, he would take up the central position and attack two co-operating forces at their hinge, swing round to fight one until it fled, then turn to face the other.[70] In this Italian campaign, Bonaparte’s army captured 150,000 prisoners, 540 cannons, and 170 standards.[71] The French army fought 67 actions and won 18 pitched battles through superior artillery technology and Bonaparte’s tactics.[72]
During the campaign, Bonaparte became increasingly influential in French politics. He founded two newspapers: one for the troops in his army and another for circulation in France.[73] The royalists attacked Bonaparte for looting Italy and warned that he might become a dictator.[74] Napoleon’s forces extracted an estimated $45 million in funds from Italy during their campaign there, another $12 million in precious metals and jewels. His forces confiscated more than 300 priceless paintings and sculptures.[75]
Bonaparte sent General Pierre Augereau to Paris to lead a coup d’état and purge the royalists on 4 September—the Coup of 18 Fructidor. This left Barras and his Republican allies in control again but dependent upon Bonaparte, who proceeded to peace negotiations with Austria. These negotiations resulted in the Treaty of Campo Formio. Bonaparte returned to Paris in December 1797 as a hero.[76] He met Talleyrand, France’s new Foreign Minister—who served in the same capacity for Emperor Napoleon—and they began to prepare for an invasion of Britain.[46]
Egyptian expedition
After two months of planning, Bonaparte decided that France’s naval strength was not yet sufficient to confront the British Royal Navy. He decided on a military expedition to seize Egypt and thereby undermine Britain’s access to its trade interests in India.[46] Bonaparte wished to establish a French presence in the Middle East and join forces with Tipu Sultan, the Sultan of Mysore who was an enemy of the British.[77] Napoleon assured the Directory that «as soon as he had conquered Egypt, he will establish relations with the Indian princes and, together with them, attack the English in their possessions».[78] The Directory agreed in order to secure a trade route to the Indian subcontinent.[79]
In May 1798, Bonaparte was elected a member of the French Academy of Sciences. His Egyptian expedition included a group of 167 scientists, with mathematicians, naturalists, chemists, and geodesists among them. Their discoveries included the Rosetta Stone, and their work was published in the Description de l’Égypte in 1809.[80]
En route to Egypt, Bonaparte reached Malta on 9 June 1798, then controlled by the Knights Hospitaller. Grand Master Ferdinand von Hompesch zu Bolheim surrendered after token resistance, and Bonaparte captured an important naval base with the loss of only three men.[81]
Bonaparte and his expedition eluded pursuit by the Royal Navy and landed at Alexandria on 1 July.[46] He fought the Battle of Shubra Khit against the Mamluks, Egypt’s ruling military caste. This helped the French practise their defensive tactic for the Battle of the Pyramids, fought on 21 July, about 24 km (15 mi) from the pyramids. General Bonaparte’s forces of 25,000 roughly equalled those of the Mamluks’ Egyptian cavalry. Twenty-nine French[82] and approximately 2,000 Egyptians were killed. The victory boosted the morale of the French army.[83]
On 1 August 1798, the British fleet under Sir Horatio Nelson captured or destroyed all but two vessels of the French fleet in the Battle of the Nile, defeating Bonaparte’s goal to strengthen the French position in the Mediterranean.[84] His army had succeeded in a temporary increase of French power in Egypt, though it faced repeated uprisings.[85] In early 1799, he moved an army into the Ottoman province of Damascus (Syria and Galilee). Bonaparte led these 13,000 French soldiers in the conquest of the coastal towns of Arish, Gaza, Jaffa, and Haifa.[86] The attack on Jaffa was particularly brutal. Bonaparte discovered that many of the defenders were former prisoners of war, ostensibly on parole, so he ordered the garrison and some 1,500–2,000 prisoners to be executed by bayonet or drowning.[87] Men, women, and children were robbed and murdered for three days.[88]
Bonaparte began with an army of 13,000 men. 1,500 were reported missing, 1,200 died in combat, and thousands perished from disease—mostly bubonic plague. He failed to reduce the fortress of Acre, so he marched his army back to Egypt in May. To speed up the retreat, Bonaparte ordered plague-stricken men to be poisoned with opium. The number who died remains disputed, ranging from a low of 30 to a high of 580. He also brought out 1,000 wounded men.[89] Back in Egypt on 25 July, Bonaparte defeated an Ottoman amphibious invasion at Abukir.[90]
Ruler of France
General Bonaparte surrounded by members of the Council of Five Hundred during the Coup of 18 Brumaire, by François Bouchot
While in Egypt, Bonaparte stayed informed of European affairs. He learned that France had suffered a series of defeats in the War of the Second Coalition.[91] On 24 August 1799, fearing that the Republic’s future was in doubt, he took advantage of the temporary departure of British ships from French coastal ports and set sail for France, despite the fact that he had received no explicit orders from Paris.[92] The army was left in the charge of Jean-Baptiste Kléber.[93]
Unknown to Bonaparte, the Directory had sent him orders to return to ward off possible invasions of French soil, but poor lines of communication prevented the delivery of these messages.[91] By the time that he reached Paris in October, France’s situation had been improved by a series of victories. The Republic, however, was bankrupt and the ineffective Directory was unpopular with the French population.[94] The Directory discussed Bonaparte’s «desertion» but was too weak to punish him.[91]
Despite the failures in Egypt, Napoleon returned to a hero’s welcome. He drew together an alliance with director Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès, his brother Lucien, speaker of the Council of Five Hundred Roger Ducos, director Joseph Fouché, and Talleyrand, and they overthrew the Directory by a coup d’état on 9 November 1799 («the 18th Brumaire» according to the revolutionary calendar), closing down the Council of Five Hundred. Napoleon became «first consul» for ten years, with two consuls appointed by him who had consultative voices only. His power was confirmed by the new «Constitution of the Year VIII», originally devised by Sieyès to give Napoleon a minor role, but rewritten by Napoleon, and accepted by direct popular vote (3,000,000 in favour, 1,567 opposed). The constitution preserved the appearance of a republic but, in reality, established a dictatorship.[95][96]
French Consulate
Napoleon established a political system that historian Martyn Lyons called «dictatorship by plebiscite».[97] Worried by the democratic forces unleashed by the Revolution, but unwilling to ignore them entirely, Napoleon resorted to regular electoral consultations with the French people on his road to imperial power.[97] He drafted the Constitution of the Year VIII and secured his own election as First Consul, taking up residence at the Tuileries. The constitution was approved in a rigged plebiscite held the following January, with 99.94 percent officially listed as voting «yes».[98]
Napoleon’s brother, Lucien, had falsified the returns to show that 3 million people had participated in the plebiscite. The real number was 1.5 million.[97] Political observers at the time assumed the eligible French voting public numbered about 5 million people, so the regime artificially doubled the participation rate to indicate popular enthusiasm for the consulate.[97] In the first few months of the consulate, with war in Europe still raging and internal instability still plaguing the country, Napoleon’s grip on power remained very tenuous.[99]
In the spring of 1800, Napoleon and his troops crossed the Swiss Alps into Italy, aiming to surprise the Austrian armies that had reoccupied the peninsula when Napoleon was still in Egypt.[h] After a difficult crossing over the Alps, the French army entered the plains of Northern Italy virtually unopposed.[101] While one French army approached from the north, the Austrians were busy with another stationed in Genoa, which was besieged by a substantial force. The fierce resistance of this French army, under André Masséna, gave the northern force some time to carry out their operations with little interference.[102]
After spending several days looking for each other, the two armies collided at the Battle of Marengo on 14 June. General Melas had a numerical advantage, fielding about 30,000 Austrian soldiers while Napoleon commanded 24,000 French troops.[103] The battle began favourably for the Austrians as their initial attack surprised the French and gradually drove them back. Melas stated that he had won the battle and retired to his headquarters around 3 pm, leaving his subordinates in charge of pursuing the French.[104] The French lines never broke during their tactical retreat. Napoleon constantly rode out among the troops urging them to stand and fight.[105]
Late in the afternoon, a full division under Desaix arrived on the field and reversed the tide of the battle. A series of artillery barrages and cavalry charges decimated the Austrian army, which fled over the Bormida River back to Alessandria, leaving behind 14,000 casualties.[105] The following day, the Austrian army agreed to abandon Northern Italy once more with the Convention of Alessandria, which granted them safe passage to friendly soil in exchange for their fortresses throughout the region.[105]
Although critics have blamed Napoleon for several tactical mistakes preceding the battle, they have also praised his audacity for selecting a risky campaign strategy, choosing to invade the Italian peninsula from the north when the vast majority of French invasions came from the west, near or along the coastline.[106] As David G. Chandler points out, Napoleon spent almost a year getting the Austrians out of Italy in his first campaign. In 1800, it took him only a month to achieve the same goal.[106] German strategist and field marshal Alfred von Schlieffen concluded that «Bonaparte did not annihilate his enemy but eliminated him and rendered him harmless» while attaining «the object of the campaign: the conquest of North Italy».[107]
Napoleon’s triumph at Marengo secured his political authority and boosted his popularity back home, but it did not lead to an immediate peace. Bonaparte’s brother, Joseph, led the complex negotiations in Lunéville and reported that Austria, emboldened by British support, would not acknowledge the new territory that France had acquired. As negotiations became increasingly fractious, Bonaparte gave orders to his general Moreau to strike Austria once more. Moreau and the French swept through Bavaria and scored an overwhelming victory at Hohenlinden in December 1800. As a result, the Austrians capitulated and signed the Treaty of Lunéville in February 1801. The treaty reaffirmed and expanded earlier French gains at Campo Formio.[108]
Temporary peace in Europe
After a decade of constant warfare, France and Britain signed the Treaty of Amiens in March 1802, bringing the Revolutionary Wars to an end. Amiens called for the withdrawal of British troops from recently conquered colonial territories as well as for assurances to curtail the expansionary goals of the French Republic.[102] With Europe at peace and the economy recovering, Napoleon’s popularity soared to its highest levels under the consulate, both domestically and abroad.[109] In a new plebiscite during the spring of 1802, the French public came out in huge numbers to approve a constitution that made the Consulate permanent, essentially elevating Napoleon to dictator for life.[109]
Whereas the plebiscite two years earlier had brought out 1.5 million people to the polls, the new referendum enticed 3.6 million to go and vote (72 percent of all eligible voters).[110] There was no secret ballot in 1802 and few people wanted to openly defy the regime. The constitution gained approval with over 99% of the vote.[110] His broad powers were spelled out in the new constitution: Article 1. The French people name, and the Senate proclaims Napoleon-Bonaparte First Consul for Life.[111] After 1802, he was generally referred to as Napoleon rather than Bonaparte.[40]
The 1803 Louisiana Purchase totalled 2,144,480 square kilometres (827,987 square miles), doubling the size of the United States.
The brief peace in Europe allowed Napoleon to focus on French colonies abroad. Saint-Domingue had managed to acquire a high level of political autonomy during the Revolutionary Wars, with Toussaint L’Ouverture installing himself as de facto dictator by 1801. Napoleon saw a chance to reestablish control over the colony when he signed the Treaty of Amiens. In the 18th century, Saint-Domingue had been France’s most profitable colony, producing more sugar than all the British West Indies colonies combined. However, during the Revolution, the National Convention voted to abolish slavery in February 1794.[112] Aware of the expenses required to fund his wars in Europe, Napoleon made the decision to reinstate slavery in all French Caribbean colonies. The 1794 decree had only affected the colonies of Saint-Domingue, Guadeloupe and Guiana, and did not take effect in Mauritius, Reunion and Martinique, the last of which had been captured by the British and as such remained unaffected by French law.[113]
In Guadeloupe slavery had been abolished (and its ban violently enforced) by Victor Hugues against opposition from slaveholders thanks to the 1794 law. However, when slavery was reinstated in 1802, a slave revolt broke out under the leadership of Louis Delgrès.[114] The resulting Law of 20 May had the express purpose of reinstating slavery in Saint-Domingue, Guadeloupe and French Guiana, and restored slavery throughout most of the French colonial empire (excluding Saint-Domingue) for another half a century, while the French transatlantic slave trade continued for another twenty years.[115][116][117][118][119]
Napoleon sent an expedition under his brother-in-law General Leclerc to reassert control over Saint-Domingue. Although the French managed to capture Toussaint Louverture, the expedition failed when high rates of disease crippled the French army, and Jean-Jacques Dessalines won a string of victories, first against Leclerc, and when he died from yellow fever, then against Donatien-Marie-Joseph de Vimeur, vicomte de Rochambeau, whom Napoleon sent to relieve Leclerc with another 20,000 men. In May 1803, Napoleon acknowledged defeat, and the last 8,000 French troops left the island and the slaves proclaimed an independent republic that they called Haiti in 1804. In the process, Dessalines became arguably the most successful military commander in the struggle against Napoleonic France.[120][121] Seeing the failure of his efforts in Haiti, Napoleon decided in 1803 to sell the Louisiana Territory to the United States, instantly doubling the size of the U.S. The selling price in the Louisiana Purchase was less than three cents per acre, a total of $15 million.[2][122]
The peace with Britain proved to be uneasy and controversial.[123] Britain did not evacuate Malta as promised and protested against Bonaparte’s annexation of Piedmont and his Act of Mediation, which established a new Swiss Confederation. Neither of these territories were covered by Amiens, but they inflamed tensions significantly.[124] The dispute culminated in a declaration of war by Britain in May 1803; Napoleon responded by reassembling the invasion camp at Boulogne and declaring that every British male between eighteen and sixty years old in France and its dependencies to be arrested as a prisoner of war.[125]
French Empire
During the consulate, Napoleon faced several royalist and Jacobin assassination plots, including the Conspiration des poignards (Dagger plot) in October 1800 and the Plot of the Rue Saint-Nicaise (also known as the Infernal Machine) two months later.[126] In January 1804, his police uncovered an assassination plot against him that involved Moreau and which was ostensibly sponsored by the Bourbon family, the former rulers of France. On the advice of Talleyrand, Napoleon ordered the kidnapping of the Duke of Enghien, violating the sovereignty of Baden. The Duke was quickly executed after a secret military trial, even though he had not been involved in the plot.[127] Enghien’s execution infuriated royal courts throughout Europe, becoming one of the contributing political factors for the outbreak of the Napoleonic Wars.
To expand his power, Napoleon used these assassination plots to justify the creation of an imperial system based on the Roman model. He believed that a Bourbon restoration would be more difficult if his family’s succession was entrenched in the constitution.[128] Launching yet another referendum, Napoleon was elected as Emperor of the French by a tally exceeding 99%.[110] As with the Life Consulate two years earlier, this referendum produced heavy participation, bringing out almost 3.6 million voters to the polls.[110]
A keen observer of Bonaparte’s rise to absolute power, Madame de Rémusat, explains that «men worn out by the turmoil of the Revolution […] looked for the domination of an able ruler» and that «people believed quite sincerely that Bonaparte, whether as consul or emperor, would exert his authority and save [them] from the perils of anarchy.»[129]»
Napoleon’s throne room at Fontainebleau
Napoleon’s coronation, at which Pope Pius VII officiated, took place at Notre Dame de Paris, on 2 December 1804. Two separate crowns were brought for the ceremony: a golden laurel wreath recalling the Roman Empire, and a replica of Charlemagne’s crown.[130] Napoleon entered the ceremony wearing the laurel wreath and kept it on his head throughout the proceedings.[130] For the official coronation, he raised the Charlemagne crown over his own head in a symbolic gesture, but never placed it on top because he was already wearing the golden wreath.[130] Instead he placed the crown on Josephine’s head, the event commemorated in the officially sanctioned painting by Jacques-Louis David.[130] Napoleon was crowned King of Italy, with the Iron Crown of Lombardy, at the Cathedral of Milan on 26 May 1805. He created eighteen Marshals of the Empire from among his top generals to secure the allegiance of the army on 18 May 1804, the official start of the Empire.[131]
War of the Third Coalition
Great Britain had broken the Peace of Amiens by declaring war on France in May 1803.[132] In December 1804, an Anglo-Swedish agreement became the first step towards the creation of the Third Coalition. By April 1805, Britain had also signed an alliance with Russia.[133] Austria had been defeated by France twice in recent memory and wanted revenge, so it joined the coalition a few months later.[134]
Before the formation of the Third Coalition, Napoleon had assembled an invasion force, the Armée d’Angleterre, around six camps at Boulogne in Northern France. He intended to use this invasion force to strike at England. They never invaded, but Napoleon’s troops received careful and invaluable training for future military operations.[135] The men at Boulogne formed the core for what Napoleon later called La Grande Armée. At the start, this French army had about 200,000 men organized into seven corps, which were large field units that contained 36–40 cannons each and were capable of independent action until other corps could come to the rescue.[136]
A single corps properly situated in a strong defensive position could survive at least a day without support, giving the Grande Armée countless strategic and tactical options on every campaign. On top of these forces, Napoleon created a cavalry reserve of 22,000 organized into two cuirassier divisions, four mounted dragoon divisions, one division of dismounted dragoons, and one of light cavalry, all supported by 24 artillery pieces.[137] By 1805, the Grande Armée had grown to a force of 350,000 men,[137] who were well equipped, well trained, and led by competent officers.[138]
Napoleon knew that the French fleet could not defeat the Royal Navy in a head-to-head battle, so he planned to lure it away from the English Channel through diversionary tactics.[139] The main strategic idea involved the French Navy escaping from the British blockades of Toulon and Brest and threatening to attack the British West Indies. In the face of this attack, it was hoped, the British would weaken their defence of the Western Approaches by sending ships to the Caribbean, allowing a combined Franco-Spanish fleet to take control of the English channel long enough for French armies to cross and invade.[139] However, the plan unravelled after the British victory at the Battle of Cape Finisterre in July 1805. French Admiral Villeneuve then retreated to Cádiz instead of linking up with French naval forces at Brest for an attack on the English Channel.[140]
By August 1805, Napoleon had realized that the strategic situation had changed fundamentally. Facing a potential invasion from his continental enemies, he decided to strike first and turned his army’s sights from the English Channel to the Rhine. His basic objective was to destroy the isolated Austrian armies in Southern Germany before their Russian allies could arrive. On 25 September, after great secrecy and feverish marching, 200,000 French troops began to cross the Rhine on a front of 260 km (160 mi).[141][142]
Austrian commander Karl Mack had gathered the greater part of the Austrian army at the fortress of Ulm in Swabia. Napoleon swung his forces to the southeast and the Grande Armée performed an elaborate wheeling movement that outflanked the Austrian positions. The Ulm Maneuver completely surprised General Mack, who belatedly understood that his army had been cut off. After some minor engagements that culminated in the Battle of Ulm, Mack finally surrendered after realizing that there was no way to break out of the French encirclement. For just 2,000 French casualties, Napoleon had managed to capture a total of 60,000 Austrian soldiers through his army’s rapid marching.[143] Napoleon wrote after the conflict:
«I have accomplished my object, I have destroyed the Austrian army by simply marching.»[144]
The Ulm Campaign is generally regarded as a strategic masterpiece and was influential in the development of the Schlieffen Plan in the late 19th century.[145] For the French, this spectacular victory on land was soured by the decisive victory that the Royal Navy attained at the Battle of Trafalgar on 21 October. After Trafalgar, the Royal Navy was never again seriously challenged by a French fleet in a large-scale engagement for the duration of the Napoleonic Wars.[146]
Following the Ulm Campaign, French forces managed to capture Vienna in November. The fall of Vienna provided the French a huge bounty as they captured 100,000 muskets, 500 cannons, and the intact bridges across the Danube.[147] At this critical juncture, both Tsar Alexander I and Holy Roman Emperor Francis II decided to engage Napoleon in battle, despite reservations from some of their subordinates. Napoleon sent his army north in pursuit of the Allies but then ordered his forces to retreat so that he could feign a grave weakness.[148]
Desperate to lure the Allies into battle, Napoleon gave every indication in the days preceding the engagement that the French army was in a pitiful state, even abandoning the dominant Pratzen Heights, a sloping hill near the village of Austerlitz. At the Battle of Austerlitz, in Moravia on 2 December, he deployed the French army below the Pratzen Heights and deliberately weakened his right flank, enticing the Allies to launch a major assault there in the hopes of rolling up the whole French line. A forced march from Vienna by Marshal Davout and his III Corps plugged the gap left by Napoleon just in time.[148]
Meanwhile, the heavy Allied deployment against the French right flank weakened their center on the Pratzen Heights, which was viciously attacked by the IV Corps of Marshal Soult. With the Allied center demolished, the French swept through both enemy flanks and sent the Allies fleeing chaotically, capturing thousands of prisoners in the process. The battle is often seen as a tactical masterpiece because of the near-perfect execution of a calibrated but dangerous plan—of the same stature as Cannae, the celebrated triumph by Hannibal some 2,000 years before.[148]
The Allied disaster at Austerlitz significantly shook the faith of Emperor Francis in the British-led war effort. France and Austria agreed to an armistice immediately and the Treaty of Pressburg followed shortly after on 26 December. Pressburg took Austria out of both the war and the Coalition while reinforcing the earlier treaties of Campo Formio and of Lunéville between the two powers. The treaty confirmed the Austrian loss of lands to France in Italy and Bavaria, and lands in Germany to Napoleon’s German allies.[149]
It imposed an indemnity of 40 million francs on the defeated Habsburgs and allowed the fleeing Russian troops free passage through hostile territories and back to their home soil. Napoleon went on to say, «The battle of Austerlitz is the finest of all I have fought».[150] Frank McLynn suggests that Napoleon was so successful at Austerlitz that he lost touch with reality, and what used to be French foreign policy became a «personal Napoleonic one».[151] Vincent Cronin disagrees, stating that Napoleon was not overly ambitious for himself, «he embodied the ambitions of thirty million Frenchmen».[152]
Middle-Eastern alliances
Napoleon continued to entertain a grand scheme to establish a French presence in the Middle East in order to put pressure on Britain and Russia, and perhaps form an alliance with the Ottoman Empire.[77] In February 1806, Ottoman Emperor Selim III recognised Napoleon as Emperor. He also opted for an alliance with France, calling France «our sincere and natural ally».[153] That decision brought the Ottoman Empire into a losing war against Russia and Britain. A Franco-Persian alliance was formed between Napoleon and the Persian Empire of Fat′h-Ali Shah Qajar. It collapsed in 1807 when France and Russia formed an unexpected alliance.[77] In the end, Napoleon had made no effective alliances in the Middle East.[154]
War of the Fourth Coalition and Tilsit
After Austerlitz, Napoleon established the Confederation of the Rhine in 1806. A collection of German states intended to serve as a buffer zone between France and Central Europe, the creation of the Confederation spelled the end of the Holy Roman Empire and significantly alarmed the Prussians. The brazen reorganization of German territory by the French risked threatening Prussian influence in the region, if not eliminating it outright. War fever in Berlin rose steadily throughout the summer of 1806. At the insistence of his court, especially his wife Queen Louise, Frederick William III decided to challenge the French domination of Central Europe by going to war.[155]
The initial military manoeuvres began in September 1806. In a letter to Marshal Soult detailing the plan for the campaign, Napoleon described the essential features of Napoleonic warfare and introduced the phrase le bataillon-carré («square battalion»).[156] In the bataillon-carré system, the various corps of the Grande Armée would march uniformly together in close supporting distance.[156] If any single corps was attacked, the others could quickly spring into action and arrive to help.[157]
Napoleon invaded Prussia with 180,000 troops, rapidly marching on the right bank of the River Saale. As in previous campaigns, his fundamental objective was to destroy one opponent before reinforcements from another could tip the balance of the war. Upon learning the whereabouts of the Prussian army, the French swung westwards and crossed the Saale with overwhelming force. At the twin battles of Jena and Auerstedt, fought on 14 October, the French convincingly defeated the Prussians and inflicted heavy casualties. With several major commanders dead or incapacitated, the Prussian king proved incapable of effectively commanding the army, which began to quickly disintegrate.[157]
In a vaunted pursuit that epitomized the «peak of Napoleonic warfare», according to historian Richard Brooks,[157] the French managed to capture 140,000 soldiers, over 2,000 cannons and hundreds of ammunition wagons, all in a single month. Historian David Chandler wrote of the Prussian forces: «Never has the morale of any army been more completely shattered».[156] Despite their overwhelming defeat, the Prussians refused to negotiate with the French until the Russians had an opportunity to enter the fight.
Following his triumph, Napoleon imposed the first elements of the Continental System through the Berlin Decree issued in November 1806. The Continental System, which prohibited European nations from trading with Britain, was widely violated throughout his reign.[158][159] In the next few months, Napoleon marched against the advancing Russian armies through Poland and was involved in the bloody stalemate at the Battle of Eylau in February 1807.[160] After a period of rest and consolidation on both sides, the war restarted in June with an initial struggle at Heilsberg that proved indecisive.[161]
On 14 June Napoleon obtained an overwhelming victory over the Russians at the Battle of Friedland, wiping out the majority of the Russian army in a very bloody struggle. The scale of their defeat convinced the Russians to make peace with the French. On 19 June, Tsar Alexander sent an envoy to seek an armistice with Napoleon. The latter assured the envoy that the Vistula River represented the natural borders between French and Russian influence in Europe. On that basis, the two emperors began peace negotiations at the town of Tilsit after meeting on an iconic raft on the River Niemen. The very first thing Alexander said to Napoleon was probably well-calibrated: «I hate the English as much as you do».[161] Their meeting lasted two hours. Despite waging wars against each other the two Emperors were very much impressed and fascinated by one another. “Never,” said Alexander afterward, “did I love any man as I loved that man.”[162]
Alexander faced pressure from his brother, Duke Constantine, to make peace with Napoleon. Given the victory he had just achieved, the French emperor offered the Russians relatively lenient terms—demanding that Russia join the Continental System, withdraw its forces from Wallachia and Moldavia, and hand over the Ionian Islands to France.[163] By contrast, Napoleon dictated very harsh peace terms for Prussia, despite the ceaseless exhortations of Queen Louise. Wiping out half of Prussian territories from the map, Napoleon created a new kingdom of 2,800 square kilometres (1,100 sq mi) called Westphalia and appointed his young brother Jérôme as its monarch.[164]
Prussia’s humiliating treatment at Tilsit caused a deep and bitter antagonism that festered as the Napoleonic era progressed. Moreover, Alexander’s pretensions at friendship with Napoleon led the latter to seriously misjudge the true intentions of his Russian counterpart, who would violate numerous provisions of the treaty in the next few years. Despite these problems, the Treaties of Tilsit at last gave Napoleon a respite from war and allowed him to return to France, which he had not seen in over 300 days.[164]
Peninsular War and Erfurt
The settlements at Tilsit gave Napoleon time to organize his empire. One of his major objectives became enforcing the Continental System against the British forces. He decided to focus his attention on the Kingdom of Portugal, which consistently violated his trade prohibitions. After defeat in the War of the Oranges in 1801, Portugal adopted a double-sided policy.
Unhappy with this change of policy by the Portuguese government, Napoleon negotiated a secret treaty with Charles IV of Spain and sent an army to invade Portugal.[165] On 17 October 1807, 24,000 French troops under General Junot crossed the Pyrenees with Spanish cooperation and headed towards Portugal to enforce Napoleon’s orders.[166] This attack was the first step in what would eventually become the Peninsular War, a six-year struggle that significantly sapped French strength. Throughout the winter of 1808, French agents became increasingly involved in Spanish internal affairs, attempting to incite discord between members of the Spanish royal family. On 16 February 1808, secret French machinations finally materialized when Napoleon announced that he would intervene to mediate between the rival political factions in the country.[167]
Marshal Murat led 120,000 troops into Spain. The French arrived in Madrid on 24 March,[168] where wild riots against the occupation erupted just a few weeks later. Napoleon appointed his brother, Joseph Bonaparte, as the new King of Spain in the summer of 1808. The appointment enraged a heavily religious and conservative Spanish population. Resistance to French aggression soon spread throughout Spain. The shocking French defeats at the Battle of Bailén and the Battle of Vimiero gave hope to Napoleon’s enemies and partly persuaded the French emperor to intervene in person.[169]
Before going to Iberia, Napoleon decided to address several lingering issues with the Russians. At the Congress of Erfurt in October 1808, Napoleon hoped to keep Russia on his side during the upcoming struggle in Spain and during any potential conflict against Austria. The two sides reached an agreement, the Erfurt Convention, that called upon Britain to cease its war against France, that recognized the Russian conquest of Finland from Sweden and made it an autonomous Grand Duchy,[170] and that affirmed Russian support for France in a possible war against Austria «to the best of its ability».[171]
Napoleon then returned to France and prepared for war. The Grande Armée, under the Emperor’s personal command, rapidly crossed the Ebro River in November 1808 and inflicted a series of crushing defeats against the Spanish forces. After clearing the last Spanish force guarding the capital at Somosierra, Napoleon entered Madrid on 4 December with 80,000 troops.[172] He then unleashed his soldiers against Moore and the British forces. The British were swiftly driven to the coast, and they withdrew from Spain entirely after a last stand at the Battle of Corunna in January 1809 and the death of Moore.[173]
Napoleon accepting the surrender of Madrid, 4 December 1808
Napoleon would end up leaving Iberia in order to deal with the Austrians in Central Europe, but the Peninsular War continued on long after his absence. He never returned to Spain after the 1808 campaign. Several months after Corunna, the British sent another army to the peninsula under Arthur Wellesley, the future Duke of Wellington. The war then settled into a complex and asymmetric strategic deadlock where all sides struggled to gain the upper hand. The highlight of the conflict became the brutal guerrilla warfare that engulfed much of the Spanish countryside. Both sides committed the worst atrocities of the Napoleonic Wars during this phase of the conflict.[174]
The vicious guerrilla fighting in Spain, largely absent from the French campaigns in Central Europe, severely disrupted the French lines of supply and communication. Although France maintained roughly 300,000 troops in Iberia during the Peninsular War, the vast majority were tied down to garrison duty and to intelligence operations.[174] The French were never able to concentrate all of their forces effectively, prolonging the war until events elsewhere in Europe finally turned the tide in favour of the Allies. After the invasion of Russia in 1812, the number of French troops in Spain vastly declined as Napoleon needed reinforcements to conserve his strategic position in Europe. By 1814 the Allies had pushed the French out of the peninsula.
The impact of the Napoleonic invasion of Spain and ousting of the Spanish Bourbon monarchy in favour of his brother Joseph had an enormous impact on the Spanish empire. In Spanish America many local elites formed juntas and set up mechanisms to rule in the name of Ferdinand VII of Spain, whom they considered the legitimate Spanish monarch. The outbreak of the Spanish American wars of independence in most of the empire was a result of Napoleon’s destabilizing actions in Spain and led to the rise of strongmen in the wake of these wars.[175]
War of the Fifth Coalition and Marie Louise
After four years on the sidelines, Austria sought another war with France to avenge its recent defeats. Austria could not count on Russian support because the latter was at war with Britain, Sweden, and the Ottoman Empire in 1809. Frederick William of Prussia initially promised to help the Austrians but reneged before conflict began.[176] A report from the Austrian finance minister suggested that the treasury would run out of money by the middle of 1809 if the large army that the Austrians had formed since the Third Coalition remained mobilized.[176] Although Archduke Charles warned that the Austrians were not ready for another showdown with Napoleon, a stance that landed him in the so-called «peace party», he did not want to see the army demobilized either.[176] On 8 February 1809, the advocates for war finally succeeded when the Imperial Government secretly decided on another confrontation against the French.[177]
In the early morning of 10 April, leading elements of the Austrian army crossed the Inn River and invaded Bavaria. The early Austrian attack surprised the French; Napoleon himself was still in Paris when he heard about the invasion. He arrived at Donauwörth on the 17th to find the Grande Armée in a dangerous position, with its two wings separated by 120 km (75 mi) and joined by a thin cordon of Bavarian troops. Charles pressed the left wing of the French army and hurled his men towards the III Corps of Marshal Davout.[178]
In response, Napoleon came up with a plan to cut off the Austrians in the celebrated Landshut Maneuver.[179] He realigned the axis of his army and marched his soldiers towards the town of Eckmühl. The French scored a convincing win in the resulting Battle of Eckmühl, forcing Charles to withdraw his forces over the Danube and into Bohemia. On 13 May, Vienna fell for the second time in four years, although the war continued since most of the Austrian army had survived the initial engagements in Southern Germany.
On 21 May, the French made their first major effort to cross the Danube, precipitating the Battle of Aspern-Essling. The battle was characterized by a vicious back-and-forth struggle for the two villages of Aspern and Essling, the focal points of the French bridgehead. A sustained Austrian artillery bombardment eventually convinced Napoleon to withdraw his forces back onto Lobau Island. Both sides inflicted about 23,000 casualties on each other.[180] It was the first defeat Napoleon suffered in a major set-piece battle, and it caused excitement throughout many parts of Europe because it proved that he could be beaten on the battlefield.[181]
After the setback at Aspern-Essling, Napoleon took more than six weeks in planning and preparing for contingencies before he made another attempt at crossing the Danube.[182] From 30 June to the early days of July, the French recrossed the Danube in strength, with more than 180,000 troops marching across the Marchfeld towards the Austrians.[182] Charles received the French with 150,000 of his own men.[183] In the ensuing Battle of Wagram, which also lasted two days, Napoleon commanded his forces in what was the largest battle of his career up until then. Napoleon finished off the battle with a concentrated central thrust that punctured a hole in the Austrian army and forced Charles to retreat. Austrian losses were very heavy, reaching well over 40,000 casualties.[184] The French were too exhausted to pursue the Austrians immediately, but Napoleon eventually caught up with Charles at Znaim and the latter signed an armistice on 12 July.
In the Kingdom of Holland, the British launched the Walcheren Campaign to open up a second front in the war and to relieve the pressure on the Austrians. The British army only landed at Walcheren on 30 July, by which point the Austrians had already been defeated. The Walcheren Campaign was characterized by little fighting but heavy casualties thanks to the popularly dubbed «Walcheren Fever». Over 4,000 British troops were lost in a bungled campaign, and the rest withdrew in December 1809.[185] The main strategic result from the campaign became the delayed political settlement between the French and the Austrians. Emperor Francis waited to see how the British performed in their theatre before entering into negotiations with Napoleon. Once it became apparent the British were going nowhere, the Austrians agreed to peace talks.[citation needed]
The resulting Treaty of Schönbrunn in October 1809 was the harshest that France had imposed on Austria in recent memory. Metternich and Archduke Charles had the preservation of the Habsburg Empire as their fundamental goal, and to this end, they succeeded by making Napoleon seek more modest goals in return for promises of friendship between the two powers.[186] While most of the hereditary lands remained a part of the Habsburg realm, France received Carinthia, Carniola, and the Adriatic ports, while Galicia was given to the Poles and the Salzburg area of the Tyrol went to the Bavarians.[186] Austria lost over three million subjects, about one-fifth of her total population, as a result of these territorial changes.[187]
Napoleon turned his focus to domestic affairs after the war. Empress Joséphine had still not given birth to a child from Napoleon, who became worried about the future of his empire following his death. Desperate for a legitimate heir, Napoleon divorced Joséphine on 10 January 1810 and started looking for a new wife. Hoping to cement the recent alliance with Austria through a family connection, Napoleon married the 18-year-old Archduchess Marie Louise, daughter of Emperor Francis II. On 20 March 1811, Marie Louise gave birth to a baby boy, whom Napoleon made heir apparent and bestowed the title of King of Rome. His son never actually ruled the empire, but given his brief titular rule and cousin Louis-Napoléon’s subsequent naming himself Napoléon III, historians often refer to him as Napoleon II.[188]
Invasion of Russia
In 1808, Napoleon and Tsar Alexander met at the Congress of Erfurt to preserve the Russo-French alliance. The leaders had a friendly personal relationship after their first meeting at Tilsit in 1807.[189] By 1811, however, tensions had increased, a strain on the relationship became the regular violations of the Continental System by the Russians as their economy was failing, which led Napoleon to threaten Alexander with serious consequences if he formed an alliance with Britain.[190]
By 1812, advisers to Alexander suggested the possibility of an invasion of the French Empire and the recapture of Poland. On receipt of intelligence reports on Russia’s war preparations, Napoleon expanded his Grande Armée to more than 450,000 men.[191] He ignored repeated advice against an invasion of the Russian heartland and prepared for an offensive campaign; on 24 June 1812 the invasion commenced.[192]
In an attempt to gain increased support from Polish nationalists and patriots, Napoleon termed the war the Second Polish War—the First Polish War had been the Bar Confederation uprising by Polish nobles against Russia in 1768. Polish patriots wanted the Russian part of Poland to be joined with the Duchy of Warsaw and an independent Poland created. This was rejected by Napoleon, who stated he had promised his ally Austria this would not happen. Napoleon refused to manumit the Russian serfs because of concerns this might provoke a reaction in his army’s rear. The serfs later committed atrocities against French soldiers during France’s retreat.[193]
The Russians avoided Napoleon’s objective of a decisive engagement and instead retreated deeper into Russia. A brief attempt at resistance was made at Smolensk in August; the Russians were defeated in a series of battles, and Napoleon resumed his advance. The Russians again avoided battle, although in a few cases this was only achieved because Napoleon uncharacteristically hesitated to attack when the opportunity arose. Owing to the Russian army’s scorched earth tactics, the French found it increasingly difficult to forage food for themselves and their horses.[194]
The Russians eventually offered battle outside Moscow on 7 September: the Battle of Borodino resulted in approximately 44,000 Russian and 35,000 French dead, wounded or captured, and may have been the bloodiest day of battle in history up to that point in time.[195] Although the French had won, the Russian army had accepted, and withstood, the major battle Napoleon had hoped would be decisive. Napoleon’s own account was: «The most terrible of all my battles was the one before Moscow. The French showed themselves to be worthy of victory, but the Russians showed themselves worthy of being invincible».[196]
The Russian army withdrew and retreated past Moscow. Napoleon entered the city, assuming its fall would end the war and Alexander would negotiate peace. Moscow was burned, rather than surrendered, on the order of Moscow’s governor Feodor Rostopchin. After five weeks, Napoleon and his army left. In early November Napoleon became concerned about the loss of control back in France after the Malet coup of 1812. His army walked through snow up to their knees, and nearly 10,000 men and horses froze to death on the night of 8/9 November alone. After the Battle of Berezina Napoleon managed to escape but had to abandon much of the remaining artillery and baggage train. On 5 December, shortly before arriving in Vilnius, Napoleon left the army in a sledge.[197]
The French suffered in the course of a ruinous retreat, including from the harshness of the Russian Winter. The Armée had begun as over 400,000 frontline troops, with fewer than 40,000 crossing the Berezina River in November 1812.[198] The Russians had lost 150,000 soldiers in battle and hundreds of thousands of civilians.[199]
War of the Sixth Coalition
There was a lull in fighting over the winter of 1812–13 while both the Russians and the French rebuilt their forces; Napoleon was able to field 350,000 troops.[200] Heartened by France’s loss in Russia, Prussia joined with Austria, Sweden, Russia, Great Britain, Spain, and Portugal in a new coalition. Napoleon assumed command in Germany and inflicted a series of defeats on the Coalition culminating in the Battle of Dresden in August 1813.[201]
Despite these successes, the numbers continued to mount against Napoleon, and the French army was pinned down by a force twice its size and lost at the Battle of Leipzig. This was by far the largest battle of the Napoleonic Wars and cost more than 90,000 casualties in total.[202]
The Allies offered peace terms in the Frankfurt proposals in November 1813. Napoleon would remain as Emperor of the French, but it would be reduced to its «natural frontiers». That meant that France could retain control of Belgium, Savoy and the Rhineland (the west bank of the Rhine River), while giving up control of all the rest, including all of Spain and the Netherlands, and most of Italy and Germany. Metternich told Napoleon these were the best terms the Allies were likely to offer; after further victories, the terms would be harsher and harsher. Metternich’s motivation was to maintain France as a balance against Russian threats while ending the highly destabilizing series of wars.[203]
Napoleon, expecting to win the war, delayed too long and lost this opportunity; by December the Allies had withdrawn the offer. When his back was to the wall in 1814 he tried to reopen peace negotiations on the basis of accepting the Frankfurt proposals. The Allies now had new, harsher terms that included the retreat of France to its 1791 boundaries, which meant the loss of Belgium, but Napoleon would remain Emperor. However, he rejected the term. The British wanted Napoleon permanently removed, and they prevailed, though Napoleon adamantly refused.[203][204]
Napoleon after his abdication in Fontainebleau, 4 April 1814, by Paul Delaroche
Napoleon withdrew into France, his army reduced to 70,000 soldiers and little cavalry; he faced more than three times as many Allied troops.[205] Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon’s older brother, abdicated as king of Spain on 13 December 1813 and assumed the title of lieutenant general to save the collapsing empire. The French were surrounded: British armies pressed from the south, and other Coalition forces positioned to attack from the German states. By the middle of January 1814, the Coalition had already entered France’s borders and launched a two-pronged attack on Paris, with Prussia entering from the north, and Austria from the East, marching out of the capitulated Swiss confederation. The French Empire, however, would not go down so easily. Napoleon launched a series of victories in the Six Days’ Campaign. While they repulsed the coalition forces and delayed the capture of Paris by at least a full month, these were not significant enough to turn the tide. The coalitionaries camped on the outskirts of the capital on 29 March. A day later, they advanced onto the demoralised soldiers protecting the city. Joseph Bonaparte led a final battle at the gates of Paris. They were greatly outnumbered, as 30,000 French soldiers were pitted against a combined coalition force that was 5 times greater than theirs. They were defeated, and Joseph retreated out of the city. The leaders of Paris surrendered to the Coalition on the last day of March 1814.[206] On 1 April, Alexander addressed the Sénat conservateur. Long docile to Napoleon, under Talleyrand’s prodding it had turned against him. Alexander told the Sénat that the Allies were fighting against Napoleon, not France, and they were prepared to offer honourable peace terms if Napoleon were removed from power. The next day, the Sénat passed the Acte de déchéance de l’Empereur («Emperor’s Demise Act»), which declared Napoleon deposed.
Napoleon had advanced as far as Fontainebleau when he learned that Paris had fallen. When Napoleon proposed the army march on the capital, his senior officers and marshals mutinied.[207] On 4 April, led by Ney, the senior officers confronted Napoleon. When Napoleon asserted the army would follow him, Ney replied the army would follow its generals. While the ordinary soldiers and regimental officers wanted to fight on, the senior commanders were unwilling to continue. Without any senior officers or marshals, any prospective invasion of Paris would have been impossible. Bowing to the inevitable, on 4 April Napoleon abdicated in favour of his son, with Marie Louise as regent. However, the Allies refused to accept this under prodding from Alexander, who feared that Napoleon might find an excuse to retake the throne.[208][209] Napoleon was then forced to announce his unconditional abdication only two days later.[209]
In his farewell address to the soldiers of Old Guard in 20 April, Napoleon said:
«Soldiers of my Old Guard, I have come to bid you farewell. For twenty years you have accompanied me faithfully on the paths of honor and glory. …With men like you, our cause was [not] lost, but the war would have dragged on interminably, and it would have been a civil war. … So I am sacrificing our interests to those of our country. …Do not lament my fate; if I have agreed to live on, it is to serve our glory. I wish to write the history of the great deeds we have done together. Farewell, my children!»[210]
Exile to Elba
Napoleon leaving Elba on 26 February 1815, by Joseph Beaume (1836)
The Allied Powers having declared that Emperor Napoleon was the sole obstacle to the restoration of peace in Europe, Emperor Napoleon, faithful to his oath, declares that he renounces, for himself and his heirs, the thrones of France and Italy, and that there is no personal sacrifice, even that of his life, which he is not ready to make in the interests of France.
Done in the palace of Fontainebleau, 11 April 1814.— Act of abdication of Napoleon[211]
In the Treaty of Fontainebleau, the Allies exiled Napoleon to Elba, an island of 12,000 inhabitants in the Mediterranean, 10 km (6 mi) off the Tuscan coast. They gave him sovereignty over the island and allowed him to retain the title of Emperor. Napoleon attempted suicide with a pill he had carried after nearly being captured by the Russians during the retreat from Moscow. Its potency had weakened with age, however, and he survived to be exiled, while his wife and son took refuge in Austria.[212]
He was conveyed to the island on HMS Undaunted by Captain Thomas Ussher, and he arrived at Portoferraio on 30 May 1814. In the first few months on Elba he created a small navy and army, developed the iron mines, oversaw the construction of new roads, issued decrees on modern agricultural methods, and overhauled the island’s legal and educational system.[213][214]
A few months into his exile, Napoleon learned that his ex-wife Josephine had died in France. He was devastated by the news, locking himself in his room and refusing to leave for two days.[215]
Hundred Days
Separated from his wife and son, who had returned to Austria, cut off from the allowance guaranteed to him by the Treaty of Fontainebleau, and aware of rumours he was about to be banished to a remote island in the Atlantic Ocean,[216] Napoleon escaped from Elba in the brig Inconstant on 26 February 1815 with 700 men.[216] Two days later, he landed on the French mainland at Golfe-Juan and started heading north.[216]
The 5th Regiment was sent to intercept him and made contact just south of Grenoble on 7 March 1815. Napoleon approached the regiment alone, dismounted his horse and, when he was within gunshot range, shouted to the soldiers, «Here I am. Kill your Emperor, if you wish.»[217] The soldiers quickly responded with, «Vive L’Empereur!» Ney, who had boasted to the restored Bourbon king, Louis XVIII, that he would bring Napoleon to Paris in an iron cage, affectionately kissed his former emperor and forgot his oath of allegiance to the Bourbon monarch. The two then marched together toward Paris with a growing army. The unpopular Louis XVIII fled to Belgium after realizing that he had little political support. On 13 March, the powers at the Congress of Vienna declared Napoleon an outlaw. Four days later, Great Britain, Russia, Austria, and Prussia each pledged to put 150,000 men into the field to end his rule.[218]
Napoleon arrived in Paris on 20 March and governed for a period now called the Hundred Days. By the start of June, the armed forces available to him had reached 200,000, and he decided to go on the offensive to attempt to drive a wedge between the oncoming British and Prussian armies. The French Army of the North crossed the frontier into the United Kingdom of the Netherlands, in modern-day Belgium.[219]
Napoleon’s forces fought two Coalition armies, commanded by the British Duke of Wellington and the Prussian Prince Blücher, at the Battle of Waterloo on 18 June 1815. Wellington’s army withstood repeated attacks by the French and drove them from the field while the Prussians arrived in force and broke through Napoleon’s right flank.
Napoleon returned to Paris and found that both the legislature and the people had turned against him. Realizing that his position was untenable, he abdicated on 22 June in favour of his son. He left Paris three days later and settled at Josephine’s former palace in Malmaison (on the western bank of the Seine about 17 kilometres (11 mi) west of Paris). Even as Napoleon travelled to Paris, the Coalition forces swept through France (arriving in the vicinity of Paris on 29 June), with the stated intent of restoring Louis XVIII to the French throne.
When Napoleon heard that Prussian troops had orders to capture him dead or alive, he fled to Rochefort, considering an escape to the United States. British ships were blocking every port. Napoleon surrendered to Captain Frederick Maitland on HMS Bellerophon on 15 July 1815.[220]
Exile on Saint Helena
Napoleon on Saint Helena, watercolor by Franz Josef Sandmann, c. 1820
The British kept Napoleon on the island of Saint Helena in the Atlantic Ocean, 1,870 km (1,162 mi) from the west coast of Africa. They also took the precaution of sending a small garrison of soldiers to both Saint Helena and the uninhabited Ascension Island, which lay between St. Helena and Europe, to prevent any escape from the island.[221]
Napoleon was moved to Longwood House on Saint Helena in December 1815; it had fallen into disrepair, and the location was damp, windswept and unhealthy.[222][223] The Times published articles insinuating the British government was trying to hasten his death. Napoleon often complained of the living conditions of Longwood House in letters to the island’s governor and his custodian, Hudson Lowe,[224] while his attendants complained of «colds, catarrhs, damp floors and poor provisions.»[225] Modern scientists have speculated that his later illness may have arisen from arsenic poisoning caused by copper arsenite in the wallpaper at Longwood House.[226]
With a small cadre of followers, Napoleon dictated his memoirs and grumbled about the living conditions. Lowe cut Napoleon’s expenditure, ruled that no gifts were allowed if they mentioned his imperial status, and made his supporters sign a guarantee they would stay with the prisoner indefinitely.[227] When he held a dinner party, men were expected to wear military dress and «women [appeared] in evening gowns and gems. It was an explicit denial of the circumstances of his captivity».[228]
While in exile, Napoleon wrote a book about Julius Caesar, one of his great heroes.[229] He also studied English under the tutelage of Count Emmanuel de Las Cases with the main aim of being able to read English newspapers and books, as access to French newspapers and books was heavily restricted to him on Saint Helena.[230] Napoleon also devoted himself to compiling a book «Mémorial de Ste-Hélène«, an account which reflected his self-depiction as a liberal, visionary ruler for European unification, deposed by reactionary elements of the Ancien Régime.[231]
Another pastime of Napoleon’s while in exile was playing card games.[232][233] The number of patiences named in his honour seems to suggest that he was an avid player of the solitary game. Napoleon at St Helena is described as being a favourite of his,[234] while Napoleon’s Favourite (or St. Helena) is clearly a contender. Other games with a Napoleonic theme include Napoleon’s Flank, Napoleon’s Shoulder, Napoleon’s Square and Little Napoleon Patience. However, Arnold argues that, while Napoleon played cards in exile, the notion that he played numerous patience games is «based on a misunderstanding».[232]
There were rumours of plots and even of his escape from Saint Helena, but in reality, no serious attempts were ever made.[235] For English poet Lord Byron, Napoleon was the epitome of the Romantic hero, the persecuted, lonely, and flawed genius.[236]
Death
Napoleon’s personal physician, Barry O’Meara, warned London that his declining state of health was mainly caused by the harsh treatment. During the last few years of his life, Napoleon confined himself for months on end in his damp, mold-infested and wretched habitation of Longwood. Years of isolation and loneliness took its toll on Napoleon’s mental health, having his court continually reduced, including the arrest of Count Emmanuel de Las Cases, conditions which Lord Holland used to bring about a debate regarding the treatment of Napoleon in captivity.[237]
In February 1821, Napoleon’s health began to deteriorate rapidly, and he reconciled with the Catholic Church. By March, he had become confined to bed. Napoleon died on 5 May 1821 at Longwood House at age 51, after making his last confession, Extreme Unction and Viaticum in the presence of Father Ange Vignali from his deathbed. His last words were, France, l’armée, tête d’armée, Joséphine («France, the army, head of the army, Joséphine»).[238][239][231]
Shortly after his death, an autopsy was conducted and Francesco Antommarchi, the doctor conducting the autopsy, cut off Napoleon’s penis.[29][page needed][240] Napoleon’s original death mask was created around 6 May, although it is not clear which doctor created it.[i][242] Napoleon’s heart and intestines were removed and contained separately in two sealed vessels, which were placed inside his coffin at his feet. In his will, he had asked to be buried on the banks of the Seine, but the British governor said he should be buried on Saint Helena, in the Valley of the Willows.[238]
In 1840, Louis Philippe I obtained permission from the British government to return Napoleon’s remains to France. His casket was opened to confirm that it still contained the former emperor. Despite being dead for nearly two decades, Napoleon had been very well preserved and not decomposed at all. On 15 December 1840, a state funeral was held. The horse-drawn hearse proceeded from the Arc de Triomphe down the Champs-Élysées, across the Place de la Concorde to the Esplanade des Invalides and then to the cupola in St Jérôme’s Chapel, where it remained until the tomb designed by Louis Visconti was completed.
In 1861, Napoleon’s remains were entombed in a sarcophagus of red quartzite from Russia (often mistaken for porphyry) in the crypt under the dome at Les Invalides.[243]
Cause of death
Situation of Napoleon’s body when his coffin was reopened on St Helena, by Jules Rigo, 1840
The cause of Napoleon’s death has been debated. His physician, François Carlo Antommarchi, led the autopsy, which found the cause of death to be stomach cancer. Antommarchi did not sign the official report.[244] Napoleon’s father had died of stomach cancer, although this was apparently unknown at the time of the autopsy.[245] Antommarchi found evidence of a stomach ulcer; this was the most convenient explanation for the British, who wanted to avoid criticism over their care of Napoleon.[238]
In 1955, the diaries of Napoleon’s valet, Louis Marchand, were published. His description of Napoleon in the months before his death led Sten Forshufvud in a 1961 paper in Nature to put forward other causes for his death, including deliberate arsenic poisoning.[246] Arsenic was used as a poison during the era because it was undetectable when administered over a long period. Furthermore, in a 1978 book with Ben Weider, Forshufvud noted that Napoleon’s body was found to be well preserved when moved in 1840. Arsenic is a strong preservative, and therefore this supported the poisoning hypothesis. Forshufvud and Weider observed that Napoleon had attempted to quench abnormal thirst by drinking large amounts of orgeat syrup that contained cyanide compounds in the almonds used for flavouring.[246] They maintained that the potassium tartrate used in his treatment prevented his stomach from expelling these compounds and that his thirst was a symptom of the poison. Their hypothesis was that the calomel given to Napoleon became an overdose, which killed him and left extensive tissue damage behind.[246] According to a 2007 article, the type of arsenic found in Napoleon’s hair shafts was mineral, the most toxic, and according to toxicologist Patrick Kintz, this supported the conclusion that he was murdered.[247]
There have been modern studies that have supported the original autopsy finding.[247] In a 2008 study, researchers analysed samples of Napoleon’s hair from throughout his life, as well as samples from his family and other contemporaries. All samples had high levels of arsenic, approximately 100 times higher than the current average. According to these researchers, Napoleon’s body was already heavily contaminated with arsenic as a boy, and the high arsenic concentration in his hair was not caused by intentional poisoning; people were constantly exposed to arsenic from glues and dyes throughout their lives.[j] Studies published in 2007 and 2008 dismissed evidence of arsenic poisoning, suggesting peptic ulcer and gastric cancer as the cause of death.[249]
Religion
Napoleon was baptised in Ajaccio on 21 July 1771. He was raised as a Catholic but never developed much faith,[250] though he recalled the day of his First Communion in the Catholic Church to be the happiest day of his life.[251][252] As an adult, Napoleon was a deist, believing in an absent and distant God. However, he had a keen appreciation of the power of organized religion in social and political affairs, and he paid a great deal of attention to bending it to his purposes. He noted the influence of Catholicism’s rituals and splendors.[250]
Napoleon had a civil marriage with Joséphine de Beauharnais, without religious ceremony. Napoleon was crowned Emperor on 2 December 1804 at Notre-Dame de Paris in a ceremony presided over by Pope Pius VII. On the eve of the coronation ceremony, and at the insistence of Pope Pius VII, a private religious wedding ceremony of Napoleon and Joséphine was celebrated. Cardinal Fesch performed the wedding.[253] This marriage was annulled by tribunals under Napoleon’s control in January 1810. On 1 April 1810, Napoleon married the Austrian princess Marie Louise in a Catholic ceremony. Napoleon was excommunicated by the Pope through the bull Quum memoranda in 1809, but later reconciled with the Catholic Church before his death in 1821.[254] While in exile in Saint Helena he is recorded to have said «I know men; and I tell you that Jesus Christ is not a man.»[255][256][257]
He also defended Muhammad («a great man») against Voltaire’s Mahomet.[258]
Concordat
Leaders of the Catholic Church taking the civil oath required by the Concordat
Seeking national reconciliation between revolutionaries and Catholics, Napoleon and Pope Pius VII signed the Concordat of 1801 on 15 July 1801. It solidified the Roman Catholic Church as the majority church of France and brought back most of its civil status. The hostility of devout Catholics against the state had now largely been resolved. The Concordat did not restore the vast church lands and endowments that had been seized during the revolution and sold off. As a part of the Concordat, Napoleon presented another set of laws called the Organic Articles.[259][260]
While the Concordat restored much power to the papacy, the balance of church–state relations had tilted firmly in Napoleon’s favour. He selected the bishops and supervised church finances. Napoleon and the Pope both found the Concordat useful. Similar arrangements were made with the Church in territories controlled by Napoleon, especially Italy and Germany.[261] Now, Napoleon could win favour with the Catholics while also controlling Rome in a political sense. Napoleon said in April 1801, «Skillful conquerors have not got entangled with priests. They can both contain them and use them». French children were issued a catechism that taught them to love and respect Napoleon.[262]
Arrest of Pope Pius VII
In 1809, under Napoleon’s orders, Pope Pius VII was placed under arrest in Italy, and in 1812 the prisoner Pontiff was transferred to France, being held in the Palace of Fontainebleau.[263] Because the arrest was made in a clandestine manner, some sources[264][263] describe it as a kidnapping. In January 1813, Napoleon personally forced the Pope to sign a humiliating «Concordat of Fontainebleau»[265] which was later repudiated by the Pontiff.[266] The Pope was not released until 1814, when the Coalition invaded France.
Religious emancipation
Napoleon emancipated Jews, as well as Protestants in Catholic countries and Catholics in Protestant countries, from laws which restricted them to ghettos, and he expanded their rights to property, worship, and careers. Despite the antisemitic reaction to Napoleon’s policies from foreign governments and within France, he believed emancipation would benefit France by attracting Jews to the country given the restrictions they faced elsewhere.[267]
In 1806 an assembly of Jewish notables was gathered by Napoleon to discuss 12 questions broadly dealing with the relations between Jews and Christians, as well as other issues dealing with the Jewish ability to integrate into French society. Later, after the questions were answered in a satisfactory way according to the Emperor, a «great Sanhedrin» was brought together to transform the answers into decisions that would form the basis of the future status of the Jews in France and the rest of the empire Napoleon was building.[268]
He stated, «I will never accept any proposals that will obligate the Jewish people to leave France, because to me the Jews are the same as any other citizen in our country. It takes weakness to chase them out of the country, but it takes strength to assimilate them».[269] He was seen as so favourable to the Jews that the Russian Orthodox Church formally condemned him as «Antichrist and the Enemy of God».[270]
One year after the final meeting of the Sanhedrin, on 17 March 1808, Napoleon placed the Jews on probation. Several new laws restricting the citizenship the Jews had been offered 17 years previously were instituted at that time. However, despite pressure from leaders of a number of Christian communities to refrain from granting Jews emancipation, within one year of the issue of the new restrictions, they were once again lifted in response to the appeal of Jews from all over France.[268]
Freemasonry
It is not known for certain if Napoleon was initiated into Freemasonry. As Emperor, he appointed his brothers to Masonic offices under his jurisdiction: Louis was given the title of Deputy Grand Master in 1805; Jerome the title of Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Westphalia; Joseph was appointed Grand Master of the Grand Orient de France; and finally Lucien was a member of the Grand Orient of France.[271]
Personality
Napoleon visiting the Palais Royal for the opening of the 8th session of the Tribunat in 1807, by Merry-Joseph Blondel
Historians emphasize the strength of the ambition that took Napoleon from an obscure village to rule over most of Europe.[272] In-depth academic studies about his early life conclude that up until age 2, he had a «gentle disposition».[30] His older brother, Joseph, frequently received their mother’s attention which made Napoleon more assertive and approval-driven. During his early schooling years, he would be harshly bullied by classmates for his Corsican identity and limited command of the French language. To withstand the stress he became domineering, eventually developing an inferiority complex.[30]
George F. E. Rudé stresses his «rare combination of will, intellect and physical vigour».[273] In one-on-one situations he typically had a hypnotic effect on people, seemingly bending the strongest leaders to his will.[274] He understood military technology, but was not an innovator in that regard.[275] He was an innovator in using the financial, bureaucratic, and diplomatic resources of France. He could rapidly dictate a series of complex commands to his subordinates, keeping in mind where major units were expected to be at each future point, and like a chess master, «seeing» the best plays moves ahead.[276] This intellectual vigour was accompanied by a mixture of «remarkable charisma and willpower» and «a furious temper» exhibited during failure of his plans; which commanded respect as well as dread from his adjutants.[277]
Napoleon maintained strict, efficient work habits, prioritizing what needed to be done. He cheated at cards, but repaid the losses; he had to win at everything he attempted.[278] He kept relays of staff and secretaries at work. Unlike many generals, Napoleon did not examine history to ask what Hannibal or Alexander or anyone else did in a similar situation. Critics said he won many battles simply because of luck; Napoleon responded, «Give me lucky generals», arguing that «luck» comes to leaders who recognize opportunity, and seize it.[279] Dwyer states that Napoleon’s victories at Austerlitz and Jena in 1805–06 heightened his sense of self-grandiosity, leaving him even more certain of his destiny and invincibility.[280] «I am of the race that founds empires» he once boasted, deeming himself an heir to the Ancient Romans.[281]
In terms of influence on events, it was more than Napoleon’s personality that took effect. He reorganized France itself to supply the men and money needed for wars.[282] He inspired his men—the Duke of Wellington said his presence on the battlefield was worth 40,000 soldiers, for he inspired confidence from privates to field marshals.[283] The force of his personality neutralized material difficulties as his soldiers fought with the confidence that with Napoleon in charge they would surely win.[284]
Image
The military historian Martin van Creveld has described him as «the most competent human being who ever lived».[285] Since his death, many towns, streets, ships, and even cartoon characters have been named after him. He has been portrayed in hundreds of films and discussed in hundreds of thousands of books and articles.[286][287][288] The German legal scholar Carl Theoder Welcker described Napoleon as «the greatest master of Machiavellism».[289]
When his contemporaries met him in person, many were surprised by his apparently unremarkable physical appearance in contrast to his significant deeds and reputation, especially in his youth, when he was consistently described as small and thin. English painter Joseph Farington, who observed Napoleon personally in 1802, commented that «Samuel Rogers stood a little way from me and… seemed to be disappointed in the look of [Napoleon’s] countenance [«face»] and said it was that of a little Italian.» Farington said Napoleon’s eyes were «lighter, and more of a grey, than I should have expected from his complexion», that «his person is below middle size», and that «his general aspect was milder than I had before thought it.»[290]
A personal friend of Napoleon’s said that when he first met him in Brienne-le-Château as a young man, Napoleon was only notable «for the dark color of his complexion, for his piercing and scrutinising glance, and for the style of his conversation»; he also said that Napoleon was personally a serious and somber man: «his conversation bore the appearance of ill-humor, and he was certainly not very amiable.»[291] Johann Ludwig Wurstemberger, who accompanied Napoleon from Camp Fornio in 1797 and on the Swiss campaign of 1798, noted that «Bonaparte was rather slight and emaciated-looking; his face, too, was very thin, with a dark complexion… his black, unpowdered hair hung down evenly over both shoulders», but that, despite his slight and unkempt appearance, «[h]is looks and expression were earnest and powerful.»[292]
Denis Davydov met him personally and considered him remarkably average in appearance:
His face was slightly swarthy, with regular features. His nose was not very large, but straight, with a slight, hardly noticeable bend. The hair on his head was dark reddish-blond; his eyebrows and eyelashes were much darker than the colour of his hair, and his blue eyes, set off by the almost black lashes, gave him a most pleasing expression … The man I saw was of short stature, just over five feet tall, rather heavy although he was only 37 years old.[293]
During the Napoleonic Wars, he was taken seriously by the British press as a dangerous tyrant, poised to invade. Despite or due to his average size, Napoleon was mocked in British newspapers as a short tempered small man and he was nicknamed «Little Boney in a strong fit».[294] A nursery rhyme warned children that Bonaparte ravenously ate naughty people; the «bogeyman».[295] The British propaganda about his supposedly small size was so successful that many people today «know» very little besides this untruth about him.[296] At 1.57 metres (5 ft 2 in), he had the height of an average French male but was short for an aristocrat or officer (partly why he was assigned to the artillery, since at the time the infantry and cavalry required more commanding figures).[297]
Some historians believe his size at death was incorrectly recorded due to use of an obsolete old French yardstick (a French foot equals 33 cm, while an English foot equals 30.47 cm).[297][298] But Napoleon was a champion of the metric system and had no use for the old yardsticks that had been out of use since 1793 in France. It is likely that he was 1.57 m (5 ft 2 in), the height measured on St. Helena (a British island), since he would have most likely been measured with an English yardstick rather than a yardstick of the French Old Regime.[297] Napoleon surrounded himself with tall bodyguards and was affectionately nicknamed le petit caporal (the little corporal), reflecting his reported camaraderie with his soldiers rather than his height.
When he became First Consul and later Emperor, Napoleon eschewed his general’s uniform and habitually wore the green colonel uniform (non-Hussar) of a colonel of the Chasseur à Cheval of the Imperial Guard, the regiment that served as his personal escort many times, with a large bicorne. He also habitually wore (usually on Sundays) the blue uniform of a colonel of the Imperial Guard Foot Grenadiers (blue with white facings and red cuffs). He also wore his Légion d’honneur star, medal and ribbon, and the Order of the Iron Crown decorations, white French-style culottes and white stockings. This was in contrast to the complex uniforms with many decorations of his marshals and those around him.
In his later years he gained quite a bit of weight and had a complexion considered pale or sallow, something contemporaries took note of. Novelist Paul de Kock, who saw him in 1811 on the balcony of the Tuileries, called Napoleon «yellow, obese, and bloated».[299] A British captain who met him in 1815 stated «I felt very much disappointed, as I believe everyone else did, in his appearance … He is fat, rather what we call pot-bellied, and although his leg is well shaped, it is rather clumsy … He is very sallow, with light grey eyes, and rather thin, greasy-looking brown hair, and altogether a very nasty, priestlike-looking fellow.»[300]
The stock character of Napoleon is a comically short «petty tyrant» and this has become a cliché in popular culture. He is often portrayed wearing a large bicorne hat—sideways—with a hand-in-waistcoat gesture—a reference to the painting produced in 1812 by Jacques-Louis David.[301] In 1908 Alfred Adler, a psychologist, cited Napoleon to describe an inferiority complex in which short people adopt an over-aggressive behaviour to compensate for lack of height; this inspired the term Napoleon complex.[302]
Reforms
Napoleon instituted various reforms, such as higher education, a tax code, road and sewer systems, and established the Banque de France, the first central bank in French history. He negotiated the Concordat of 1801 with the Catholic Church, which sought to reconcile the mostly Catholic population to his regime. It was presented alongside the Organic Articles, which regulated public worship in France. He dissolved the Holy Roman Empire prior to German Unification later in the 19th century. The sale of the Louisiana Territory to the United States doubled the size of the United States.[303]
In May 1802, he instituted the Legion of Honour, a substitute for the old royalist decorations and orders of chivalry, to encourage civilian and military achievements; the order is still the highest decoration in France.[304]
Napoleonic Code
First page of the 1804 original edition of the Code Civil
Napoleon’s set of civil laws, the Code Civil—now often known as the Napoleonic Code—was prepared by committees of legal experts under the supervision of Jean Jacques Régis de Cambacérès, the Second Consul. Napoleon participated actively in the sessions of the Council of State that revised the drafts. The development of the code was a fundamental change in the nature of the civil law legal system with its stress on clearly written and accessible law. Other codes («Les cinq codes») were commissioned by Napoleon to codify criminal and commerce law; a Code of Criminal Instruction was published, which enacted rules of due process.[305]
The Napoleonic code was adopted throughout much of Continental Europe, though only in the lands he conquered, and remained in force after Napoleon’s defeat. Napoleon said: «My true glory is not to have won forty battles … Waterloo will erase the memory of so many victories. … But … what will live forever, is my Civil Code».[306] The Code influences a quarter of the world’s jurisdictions such as those in Continental Europe, the Americas, and Africa.[307]
Dieter Langewiesche described the code as a «revolutionary project» that spurred the development of bourgeois society in Germany by the extension of the right to own property and an acceleration towards the end of feudalism. Napoleon reorganized what had been the Holy Roman Empire, made up of about three hundred Kleinstaaterei, into a more streamlined forty-state Confederation of the Rhine; this helped promote the German Confederation and the unification of Germany in 1871.[308]
The movement toward Italian unification was similarly precipitated by Napoleonic rule.[309] These changes contributed to the development of nationalism and the nation state.[310]
Napoleon directly overthrew remnants of feudalism in much of western Continental Europe. He liberalized property laws, ended seigneurial dues, abolished the guild of merchants and craftsmen to facilitate entrepreneurship, legalized divorce, closed the Jewish ghettos and made Jews equal to everyone else. The Inquisition ended as did the Holy Roman Empire. The power of church courts and religious authority was sharply reduced and equality under the law was proclaimed for all men.[311]
Warfare
Statue in Cherbourg-Octeville unveiled by Napoleon III in 1858. Napoleon I strengthened the town’s defences to prevent British naval incursions.
In the field of military organization, Napoleon borrowed from previous theorists such as Jacques Antoine Hippolyte, Comte de Guibert, and from the reforms of preceding French governments, and then developed much of what was already in place. He continued the policy, which emerged from the Revolution, of promotion based primarily on merit.[312]
Corps replaced divisions as the largest army units, mobile artillery was integrated into reserve batteries, the staff system became more fluid and cavalry returned as an important formation in French military doctrine. These methods are now referred to as essential features of Napoleonic warfare.[312] Though he consolidated the practice of modern conscription introduced by the Directory, one of the restored monarchy’s first acts was to end it.[313]
His opponents learned from Napoleon’s innovations. The increased importance of artillery after 1807 stemmed from his creation of a highly mobile artillery force, the growth in artillery numbers, and changes in artillery practices. As a result of these factors, Napoleon, rather than relying on infantry to wear away the enemy’s defences, now could use massed artillery as a spearhead to pound a break in the enemy’s line that was then exploited by supporting infantry and cavalry. McConachy rejects the alternative theory that growing reliance on artillery by the French army beginning in 1807 was an outgrowth of the declining quality of the French infantry and, later, France’s inferiority in cavalry numbers.[314] Weapons and other kinds of military technology remained static through the Revolutionary and Napoleonic eras, but 18th-century operational mobility underwent change.[315]
Napoleon’s biggest influence was in the conduct of warfare. Antoine-Henri Jomini explained Napoleon’s methods in a widely used textbook that influenced all European and American armies.[316] Napoleon was regarded by the influential military theorist Carl von Clausewitz as a genius in the operational art of war, and historians rank him as a great military commander.[317] Wellington, when asked who was the greatest general of the day, answered: «In this age, in past ages, in any age, Napoleon».[318][incomplete short citation]
Under Napoleon, a new emphasis towards the destruction, not just outmaneuvering, of enemy armies emerged. Invasions of enemy territory occurred over broader fronts which made wars costlier and more decisive. The political effect of war increased; defeat for a European power meant more than the loss of isolated enclaves. Near-Carthaginian peaces intertwined whole national efforts, intensifying the Revolutionary phenomenon of total war.[319]
Metric system
The official introduction of the metric system in September 1799 was unpopular in large sections of French society. Napoleon’s rule greatly aided adoption of the new standard not only across France but also across the French sphere of influence. Napoleon took a retrograde step in 1812 when he passed legislation to introduce the mesures usuelles (traditional units of measurement) for retail trade,[320] a system of measure that resembled the pre-revolutionary units but were based on the kilogram and the metre; for example, the livre metrique (metric pound) was 500 g,[321] in contrast to the value of the livre du roi (the king’s pound), 489.5 g.[322] Other units of measure were rounded in a similar manner prior to the definitive introduction of the metric system across parts of Europe in the middle of the 19th century.[323]
Education
Napoleon’s educational reforms laid the foundation of a modern system of education in France and throughout much of Europe.[324] Napoleon synthesized the best academic elements from the Ancien Régime, The Enlightenment, and the Revolution, with the aim of establishing a stable, well-educated and prosperous society. He made French the only official language. He left some primary education in the hands of religious orders, but he offered public support to secondary education. Napoleon founded a number of state secondary schools (lycées) designed to produce a standardized education that was uniform across France.[325]
All students were taught the sciences along with modern and classical languages. Unlike the system during the Ancien Régime, religious topics did not dominate the curriculum, although they were present with the teachers from the clergy. Napoleon hoped to use religion to produce social stability.[325] He gave special attention to the advanced centers, such as the École Polytechnique, that provided both military expertise and state-of-the-art research in science.[326] Napoleon made some of the first efforts at establishing a system of secular and public education.[when?] The system featured scholarships and strict discipline, with the result being a French educational system that outperformed its European counterparts, many of which borrowed from the French system.[327]
Memory and evaluation
Criticism
In the political realm, historians debate whether Napoleon was «an enlightened despot who laid the foundations of modern Europe» or «a megalomaniac who wrought greater misery than any man before the coming of Hitler».[328] Many historians have concluded that he had grandiose foreign policy ambitions. The Continental powers as late as 1808 were willing to give him nearly all of his gains and titles, but some scholars maintain he was overly aggressive and pushed for too much, until his empire collapsed.[329][330]
He was considered a tyrant and usurper by his opponents at the time and ever since. His critics charge that he was not troubled when faced with the prospect of war and death for thousands, turned his search for undisputed rule into a series of conflicts throughout Europe and ignored treaties and conventions alike.[331] His role in the Haitian Revolution and decision to reinstate slavery in France’s overseas colonies are controversial and affect his reputation.[332] French liberal intellectual Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) was a staunch critic of political homogenisation and personality cult that dominated Napoleonic France and wrote several books condemning Napoleon such as «The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation» (1814) and «Principles of Politics Applicable to All Representative Governments» (1815). According to Constant, Bonapartism was even more tyrannical than the Bourbon monarchy, since it forced the masses to support its grand universalist narrative through imperialism and jingoism.[333]
Napoleon institutionalized plunder of conquered territories: French museums contain art stolen by Napoleon’s forces from across Europe. Artefacts were brought to the Musée du Louvre for a grand central museum; an example which would later be followed by others.[334] He was compared to Adolf Hitler by the historian Pieter Geyl in 1947,[335] and Claude Ribbe in 2005.[336] David G. Chandler, a historian of Napoleonic warfare, wrote in 1973 that, «Nothing could be more degrading to the former [Napoleon] and more flattering to the latter [Hitler]. The comparison is odious. On the whole Napoleon was inspired by a noble dream, wholly dissimilar from Hitler’s… Napoleon left great and lasting testimonies to his genius—in codes of law and national identities which survive to the present day. Adolf Hitler left nothing but destruction.»[337]
Critics argue Napoleon’s true legacy must reflect the loss of status for France and needless deaths brought by his rule: historian Victor Davis Hanson writes, «After all, the military record is unquestioned—17 years of wars, perhaps six million Europeans dead, France bankrupt, her overseas colonies lost.»[338] McLynn states that, «He can be viewed as the man who set back European economic life for a generation by the dislocating impact of his wars.»[331] Vincent Cronin replies that such criticism relies on the flawed premise that Napoleon was responsible for the wars which bear his name, when in fact France was the victim of a series of coalitions that aimed to destroy the ideals of the Revolution.[339]
British military historian Correlli Barnett calls him «a social misfit» who exploited France for his personal megalomaniac goals. He says Napoleon’s reputation is exaggerated.[340] French scholar Jean Tulard provided an influential account of his image as a saviour.[341] Louis Bergeron has praised the numerous changes he made to French society, especially regarding the law as well as education.[342] His greatest failure was the Russian invasion. Many historians have blamed Napoleon’s poor planning, but Russian scholars instead emphasize the Russian response, noting the notorious winter weather was just as hard on the defenders.[343]
The large and growing historiography in French, English, Russian, Spanish and other languages has been summarized and evaluated by numerous scholars.[344][345][346]
Propaganda and memory
1814 caricature of Napoleon being exiled to Elba: the ex-emperor is riding a donkey backwards while holding a broken sword.
Napoleon’s use of propaganda contributed to his rise to power, legitimated his régime, and established his image for posterity. Strict censorship, controlling various key constituents of the press, books, theatre, and art were part of his propaganda scheme, aimed at portraying him as bringing desperately wanted peace and stability to France. The propagandistic rhetoric changed in relation to events and to the atmosphere of Napoleon’s reign, focusing first on his role as a general in the army and identification as a soldier, and moving to his role as emperor and a civil leader. Specifically targeting his civilian audience, Napoleon fostered a relationship with the contemporary art community, taking an active role in commissioning and controlling different forms of art production to suit his propaganda goals.[347]
In England, Russia and across Europe—though not in France—Napoleon was a popular topic of caricature.[348][349][350]
Hazareesingh (2004) explores how Napoleon’s image and memory are best understood. They played a key role in collective political defiance of the Bourbon restoration monarchy in 1815–1830. People from different walks of life and areas of France, particularly Napoleonic veterans, drew on the Napoleonic legacy and its connections with the ideals of the 1789 Revolution.[351]
Widespread rumours of Napoleon’s return from St. Helena and Napoleon as an inspiration for patriotism, individual and collective liberties, and political mobilization manifested themselves in seditious materials, displaying the tricolor and rosettes. There were also subversive activities celebrating anniversaries of Napoleon’s life and reign and disrupting royal celebrations—they demonstrated the prevailing and successful goal of the varied supporters of Napoleon to constantly destabilize the Bourbon regime.[351]
Datta (2005) shows that, following the collapse of militaristic Boulangism in the late 1880s, the Napoleonic legend was divorced from party politics and revived in popular culture. Concentrating on two plays and two novels from the period—Victorien Sardou’s Madame Sans-Gêne (1893), Maurice Barrès’s Les Déracinés (1897), Edmond Rostand’s L’Aiglon (1900), and André de Lorde and Gyp’s Napoléonette (1913)—Datta examines how writers and critics of the Belle Époque exploited the Napoleonic legend for diverse political and cultural ends.[352]
Reduced to a minor character, the new fictional Napoleon became not a world historical figure but an intimate one, fashioned by individuals’ needs and consumed as popular entertainment. In their attempts to represent the emperor as a figure of national unity, proponents and detractors of the Third Republic used the legend as a vehicle for exploring anxieties about gender and fears about the processes of democratization that accompanied this new era of mass politics and culture.[352]
International Napoleonic Congresses take place regularly, with participation by members of the French and American military, French politicians and scholars from different countries.[353] In January 2012, the mayor of Montereau-Fault-Yonne, near Paris—the site of a late victory of Napoleon—proposed development of Napoleon’s Bivouac, a commemorative theme park at a projected cost of 200 million euros.[354]
Long-term influence outside France
Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform.[355] After the fall of Napoleon, not only was it retained by conquered countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, parts of Italy and Germany, but it has been used as the basis of certain parts of law outside Europe including the Dominican Republic, the US state of Louisiana and the Canadian province of Quebec.[356] The code was also used as a model in many parts of Latin America.[357] The reputation of Napoleon in Poland has been favourable, especially for his support of independence, opposition to Russia, his legal code, the abolition of serfdom, and the introduction of modern middle class administration.[358]
Napoleon had an influence on the establishment of modern Germany. He caused the end of the Holy Roman Empire and helped create middle sized states such as Bavaria and Württemberg along the great powers Prussia and Austria. Although he also directly or indirectly helped to reduce the number of German states (from about 300 to fewer than 50), the middle sized states tried to prevent the unification of Germany as a federalist state. A byproduct of the French occupation was a strong development in German nationalism which eventually turned the German Confederation into the German Empire after a series of conflicts and other political developments.
Napoleon indirectly began the process of Latin American independence when he invaded Spain in 1808. The abdication of King Charles IV and renunciation of his son, Ferdinand VII created a power vacuum that was filled by native born political leaders such as Simón Bolívar and José de San Martín. Such leaders embraced nationalistic sentiments influenced by French nationalism and led successful independence movements in Latin America.[359]
Napoleon also significantly aided the United States when he agreed to sell the territory of Louisiana for 15 million dollars during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. That territory almost doubled the size of the United States, adding the equivalent of 13 states to the Union.[303]
From 1796 to 2020, at least 95 major ships were named for him. In the 21st century, at least 18 Napoleon ships are operated under the flag of France, as well as Indonesia, Germany, Italy, Australia, Argentina, India, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.[360]
Wives, mistresses, and children
Napoleon married Joséphine (née Marie Josèphe Rose Tascher de La Pagerie) in 1796, when he was 26; she was a 32-year-old widow whose first husband, Alexandre de Beauharnais, had been executed during the Reign of Terror. Five days after Alexandre de Beauharnais’ death, the Reign of Terror initiator Maximilien de Robespierre was overthrown and executed, and, with the help of high-placed friends, Joséphine was freed.[361] Until she met Bonaparte, she had been known as «Rose», a name which he disliked. He called her «Joséphine» instead, and she went by this name henceforth. Bonaparte often sent her love letters while on his campaigns.[362] He formally adopted her son Eugène and second cousin (via marriage) Stéphanie and arranged dynastic marriages for them. Joséphine had her daughter Hortense marry Napoleon’s brother Louis.[363]
Joséphine had lovers, such as Lieutenant Hippolyte Charles, during Napoleon’s Italian campaign.[364] Napoleon learnt of that affair and a letter he wrote about it was intercepted by the British and published widely, to embarrass Napoleon. Napoleon had his own affairs too: during the Egyptian campaign he took Pauline Bellisle Fourès, the wife of a junior officer, as his mistress. She became known as «Cleopatra».[k][366]
While Napoleon’s mistresses had children by him, Joséphine did not produce an heir, possibly because of either the stresses of her imprisonment during the Reign of Terror or an abortion she may have had in her twenties.[367] Napoleon chose divorce so he could remarry in search of an heir. Despite his divorce from Josephine, Napoleon showed his dedication to her for the rest of his life. When he heard the news of her death while in exile in Elba, he locked himself in his room and would not come out for two full days.[215] Her name would also be his final word on his deathbed in 1821.
On 11 March 1810 by proxy, he married the 19-year-old Marie Louise, Archduchess of Austria, and a great-niece of Marie Antoinette. Thus he had married into a German royal and imperial family.[368] Louise was less than happy with the arrangement, at least at first, stating: «Just to see the man would be the worst form of torture». Her great-aunt had been executed in France, while Napoleon had fought numerous campaigns against Austria all throughout his military career. However, she seemed to warm up to him over time. After her wedding, she wrote to her father: «He loves me very much. I respond to his love sincerely. There is something very fetching and very eager about him that is impossible to resist».[215]
Napoleon and Marie Louise remained married until his death, though she did not join him in exile on Elba and thereafter never saw her husband again. The couple had one child, Napoleon Francis Joseph Charles (1811–1832), known from birth as the King of Rome. He became Napoleon II in 1814 and reigned for only two weeks. He was awarded the title of the Duke of Reichstadt in 1818 and died of tuberculosis aged 21, with no children.[368]
Napoleon acknowledged one illegitimate son: Charles Léon (1806–1881) by Eléonore Denuelle de La Plaigne.[369] Alexandre Colonna-Walewski (1810–1868), the son of his mistress Maria Walewska, although acknowledged by Walewska’s husband, was also widely known to be his child, and the DNA of his direct male descendant has been used to help confirm Napoleon’s Y-chromosome haplotype.[370] He may have had further unacknowledged illegitimate offspring as well, such as Eugen Megerle von Mühlfeld by Emilie Victoria Kraus von Wolfsberg[371] and Hélène Napoleone Bonaparte (1816–1907) by Albine de Montholon.
Notes
- ^ , French: Napoléon Bonaparte [napɔleɔ̃ bɔnapaʁt]; Italian: Napoleone Bonaparte, [napoleˈoːne ˌbɔnaˈparte]; Corsican: Napulione Buonaparte.
- ^ French: Napoléon Ier
- ^ He established a system of public education,[7] abolished the vestiges of feudalism,[8] emancipated Jews and other religious minorities,[9] abolished the Spanish Inquisition,[10] enacted legal protections for an emerging middle class,[11] and centralized state power at the expense of religious authorities.[12]
- ^ His brother, also called Napoleon, died at birth and his sister, Maria Anna, died shortly before her first birthday. In total, two siblings died at birth and three died in infancy.
- ^ Although the 1768 Treaty of Versailles formally ceded Corsica’s rights, it remained un-incorporated during 1769[18] until it became a province of France in 1770.[19] Corsica would be legally integrated as a département in 1789.[20][21]
- ^ Aside from his name, there does not appear to be a connection between him and Napoleon’s theorem.[35]
- ^ He was mainly referred to as Bonaparte until he became First Consul for life.[40]
- ^ This is depicted in Bonaparte Crossing the Alps by Hippolyte Delaroche and in Jacques-Louis David’s imperial Napoleon Crossing the Alps. He is less realistically portrayed on a charger in the latter work.[100]
- ^ It was customary to cast a death mask of a leader. At least four genuine death masks of Napoleon are known to exist: one in The Cabildo in New Orleans, one in a Liverpool museum, another in Havana and one in the library of the University of North Carolina.[241]
- ^ The body can tolerate large doses of arsenic if ingested regularly, and arsenic was a fashionable cure-all.[248]
- ^ One night, during an illicit liaison with actress Marguerite Georges, Napoleon had a major fit. This and other more minor attacks have led historians to debate whether he had epilepsy and, if so, to what extent.[365]
Citations
- ^ «Fac-similé de l’acte de baptême de Napoléon, rédigé en italien. – Images d’Art» [Facsimile of Napoleon’s baptismal certificate, written in Italian. – Art Pictures] (in French).
- ^ a b Roberts 2014, Introduction
- ^ Charles Messenger, ed. (2001). Reader’s Guide to Military History. Routledge. pp. 391–427. ISBN 978-1-135-95970-8.
- ^ Roberts, A. (2016). Napoleon the Great. United Kingdom: Penguin Books Limited. (p. 1)
- ^ a b c Geoffrey Ellis (1997). Napoleon. Pearson Education Limited. ISBN 9781317874690.
- ^ Forrest, Alan (26 March 2015). Waterloo: Great Battles. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0199663255. Retrieved 14 June 2021.
- ^ Grab 2003, p. 56.
- ^ Broers, M. and Hicks, P.The Napoleonic Empire and the New European Political Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, p. 230
- ^ Conner, S. P. The Age of Napoleon. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004, pp. 38–40.
- ^ Perez, Joseph. The Spanish Inquisition: A History. Yale University Press, 2005, p. 98
- ^ Fremont-Barnes, G. and Fisher, T. The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Osprey Publishing, 2004, p. 336
- ^ Grab, A. Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, Conclusion
- ^ Andrew Roberts, Napoleon: A Life (2014) p. xxxiii
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 2
- ^ Gueniffey, Patrice (13 April 2015). Bonaparte. Harvard University Press. pp. 21–22. ISBN 978-0-674-42601-6.
- ^ a b Dwyer 2008a, ch 1
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. xv
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 6
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 20
- ^ «Corsica | History, Geography, & Points of Interest». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 28 November 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 142.
- ^ a b Cronin 1994, pp. 20–21
- ^ Chamberlain, Alexander (1896). The Child and Childhood in Folk Thought: (The Child in Primitive Culture), p. 385. MacMillan.
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 27
- ^ a b c International School History (8 February 2012), Napoleon’s Rise to Power, archived from the original on 8 May 2015, retrieved 29 January 2018
- ^ Johnson, Paul (2006). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-303745-3. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ a b c Roberts 2001, p. xvi
- ^ a b c Murari·Culture·, Edoardo (20 August 2019). «Italians Of The Past: Napoleon Bonaparte». Italics Magazine. Retrieved 24 October 2021.
- ^ a b Roberts 2014.
- ^ a b c d Parker, Harold T. (1971). «The Formation of Napoleon’s Personality: An Exploratory Essay». French Historical Studies. 7 (1): 6–26. doi:10.2307/286104. JSTOR 286104.
- ^ Adams, Michael (2014). Napoleon and Russia. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-4212-3. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 11.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 18
- ^ Grégoire, Henri (1790). «Report on the necessity and means to annihilate the patois and to universalise the use of the French language». Wikisource (in French). Paris: French National Convention. Retrieved 16 January 2020.
[…] the number of people who speak it purely does not exceed three million; and probably the number of those who write it correctly is even fewer.
- ^ Wells 1992, p. 74
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 21
- ^ Chandler 1973, pp. 12–14.
- ^ a b Dwyer 2008a, p. 42
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 26
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 290
- ^ Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, Corsica.
- ^ Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, Revolution.
- ^ David Nicholls (1999). Napoleon: A Biographical Companion. ABC-CLIO. p. 131. ISBN 978-0-87436-957-1.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 55
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 61
- ^ a b c d e Roberts 2001, p. xviii
- ^ Roberts, Andrew (2011). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-698-17628-7.
- ^ «Napoleon I | Biography, Achievements, & Facts». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 12 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 132
- ^ Dwyer, p. 136.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 76
- ^ Patrice Gueniffey, Bonaparte: 1769–1802 (Harvard UP, 2015), pp. 137–59.
- ^ Bourrienne, Memoirs of Napoleon, p. 39
- ^ Bourrienne, Memoirs of Napoleon, p. 38
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 157
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 76, 84
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 92
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 26
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 164
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 93
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 96
- ^ Johnson 2002, p. 27
- ^ Carlyle, Thomas (1896). «The works of Thomas Carlyle – The French Revolution, vol. III, book 3.VII». Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ Englund (2010) pp. 92–94
- ^ Bell 2015, p. 29.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, pp. 284–85
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 132
- ^ Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte, Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne, pp 158.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 145
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 142
- ^ Harvey 2006, p. 179
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 135
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 306
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 305
- ^ Bell 2015, p. 30.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 322
- ^ a b c Watson 2003, pp. 13–14
- ^ Amini 2000, p. 12
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 342
- ^ Englund (2010) pp. 127–28
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 175
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 179
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 372
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 188.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 392
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, pp. 411–24
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 198.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 189
- ^ Gueniffey, Bonaparte: 1769–1802 pp. 500–02.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 442
- ^ a b c Connelly 2006, p. 57
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, pp. 205–206.
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 444
- ^ Dwyer 2008a, p. 455
- ^ François Furet, The French Revolution, 1770–1814 (1996), p. 212
- ^ Georges Lefebvre, Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799–1807 (1969), pp. 60–68
- ^ a b c d Lyons 1994, p. 111
- ^ Lefebvre, Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit 1799–1807 (1969), pp. 71–92
- ^ Holt, Lucius Hudson; Chilton, Alexander Wheeler (1919). A Brief History of Europe from 1789–1815. Macmillan. p. 206.
August 1802 referendum napoleon.
- ^ Chandler 2002, p. 51
- ^ Chandler 1966, pp. 279–281
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 235
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 292
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 293
- ^ a b c Chandler 1966, p. 296
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, pp. 298–304
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 301
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 302
- ^ a b Lyons 1994, pp. 111–114
- ^ a b c d Lyons 1994, p. 113
- ^ Edwards 1999, p. 55
- ^ James, C. L. R. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution, [1963] (Penguin Books, 2001), pp. 141–142.
- ^ «French Emancipation». obo.
- ^ «May 10th 1802, «The last cry of innocence and despair»«. herodote (in French). Retrieved 6 December 2019.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 301.
- ^ James, C. L. R. (1963) [1938]. The Black Jacobins (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage Books. pp. 45–55. OCLC 362702.
- ^ «CHRONOLOGY-Who banned slavery when?». Reuters. Thomson Reuters. 22 March 2007. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Oldfield, Dr John (17 February 2011). «British Anti-slavery». BBC History. BBC. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ^ Perry, James Arrogant Armies Great Military Disasters and the Generals Behind Them, (Edison: Castle Books, 2005) pp. 78–79.
- ^ Christer Petley, White Fury: A Jamaican Slaveholder and the Age of Revolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), p. 182.
- ^ Roberts 2014, p. 303.
- ^ Connelly 2006, p. 70
- ^ Mowat R B (1924). The Diplomacy Of Nepoleon.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 265
- ^ Zamoyski, pp. 338–339.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 243
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 296
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 297
- ^ De Rémusat, Claire Elisabeth, Memoirs of Madame De Rémusat, 1802–1808 Volume 1, HardPress Publishing, 2012, 542 pp., ISBN 978-1-290-51747-8.
- ^ a b c d Roberts, Andrew. Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group, 2014, p. 355.
- ^ Dwyer, Philip (2015). «‘Citizen Emperor’: Political Ritual, Popular Sovereignty and the Coronation of Napoleon I». History. 100 (339): 40–57. doi:10.1111/1468-229X.12089. ISSN 1468-229X.
- ^ Paul W. Schroeder, The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848 (1996) pp. 231–286
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 328. Meanwhile, French territorial rearrangements in Germany occurred without Russian consultation and Napoleon’s annexations in the Po valley increasingly strained relations between the two.
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 331
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 323
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 332
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, p. 333
- ^ Michael J. Hughes, Forging Napoleon’s Grande Armée: Motivation, Military Culture, and Masculinity in the French Army, 1800–1808 (NYU Press, 2012).
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 321
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 332
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 108
- ^ Andrew Uffindell, Great Generals of the Napoleonic Wars. p. 15
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 156.
- ^ «Napoleon: Napoleon at War». www.pbs.org. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
- ^ Richard Brooks (editor), Atlas of World Military History. p. 156. «It is a historical cliché to compare the Schlieffen Plan with Hannibal’s tactical envelopment at Cannae (216 BC); Schlieffen owed more to Napoleon’s strategic maneuver on Ulm (1805)».
- ^ Glover (1967), pp. 233–252.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 407.
- ^ a b c Adrian Gilbert (2000). The Encyclopedia of Warfare: From Earliest Time to the Present Day. Taylor & Francis. p. 133. ISBN 978-1-57958-216-6. Archived from the original on 29 July 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2014.
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 414
- ^ Schom 1997, p. 414
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 350
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 344
- ^ Karsh 2001, p. 12
- ^ Sicker 2001, p. 99.
- ^ Michael V. Leggiere (2015). Napoleon and Berlin: The Franco-Prussian War in North Germany, 1813. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-8061-8017-5. Archived from the original on 18 November 2016.
- ^ a b c Chandler 1966, pp. 467–468
- ^ a b c Brooks 2000, p. 110
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 497
- ^ Jacques Godechot et al. Napoleonic Era in Europe (1971) pp. 126–139
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 370
- ^ a b August Fournier (1911). Napoleon I.: A Biography. H. Holt. p. 459.
- ^ The History of Napoleon Bonaparte by John Stevens Cabot Abbott, 1882, p. 559
- ^ Roberts, pp. 458–459
- ^ a b Roberts, pp. 459–461
- ^ Horne, Alistair (1997). How Far From Austerlitz? Napoleon 1805–1815. Pan Macmillan. p. 238. ISBN 978-1-74328-540-4. Archived from the original on 25 February 2018.
- ^ Todd Fisher & Gregory Fremont-Barnes, The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. p. 197.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes pp. 198–199.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes p. 199.
- ^ Chandler, pp. 620
- ^ Engman, Max (2016). «Finland and the Napoleonic Empire». In Planert, Ute (ed.). Napoleon’s Empire. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 227–238. doi:10.1057/9781137455475_16. ISBN 978-1-349-56731-7 – via Springer Link.
- ^ «The Erfurt Convention 1808». Napoleon-series.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
- ^ Fisher & Fremont-Barnes p. 205.
- ^ Hope, John; Baird, D. (28 January 1809). «Battle of Corunna». Vol. 15, no. 4. Cobbett’s political register. pp. 91–94.
- ^ a b Chandler 1966, pp. 659–660
- ^ John Lynch, Caudillos in Spanish America 1800–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992, pp. 402–403.
- ^ a b c Fisher & Fremont-Barnes, p. 106.
- ^ Gill, pp. 44–45
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 690
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 690
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 706
- ^ Chandler 1966, p. 707
- ^ a b Chandler 1973, p. 708.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 720.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 729.
- ^ «The British Expeditionary Force to Walcheren: 1809». napoleon-series.org. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
- ^ a b Todd Fisher & Gregory Fremont-Barnes, The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. p. 144.
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. 732.
- ^ David Watkin, The Roman Forum. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2012. 183.
ISBN 978-0-674-06367-9
books.google.com/books?id=cRrufMNLOhwC&pg=PA183 - ^ McLynn 1998, p. 378
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 495
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 507
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 506
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 504–505
- ^ Harvey 2006, p. 773
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 518
- ^ Markham 1988, p. 194
- ^ «Napoleon1812». napoleon-1812.nl. Archived from the original on 13 February 2016.
- ^ Markham 1988, pp. 190, 199
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 541
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 549
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 565
- ^ Chandler 1995, p. 1020
- ^ a b Riley, J.P. (2013). Napoleon and the World War of 1813: Lessons in Coalition Warfighting. Routledge. p. 206. ISBN 978-1-136-32135-1. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
- ^ Leggiere (2007). The Fall of Napoleon: Volume 1, The Allied Invasion of France, 1813–1814. pp. 53–54. ISBN 978-0-521-87542-4. Archived from the original on 21 September 2015.
- ^ Fremont-Barnes 2004, p. 14
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 585
- ^ Gates 2003, p. 259.
- ^ Lieven, Dominic (2010). Russia Against Napoleon: The True Story of the Campaigns of War and Peace. Penguin. pp. 484–485. ISBN 978-1-101-42938-9. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ a b Prutsch, M. (2012). Making Sense of Constitutional Monarchism in Post-Napoleonic France and Germany. Springer. pp. 10–15. ISBN 9781137291653.
- ^ A. Bell, David (2015). «5: Downfall, 1812–1815». Napoleon: A Concise Biography. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6.
- ^ «Napoleon’s act of abdication». Bulletin des lois de la Republique Française. July 1814. Archived from the original on 22 December 2011. Retrieved 28 August 2009.
- ^ McLynn 1998, pp. 593–594
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 597
- ^ Latson, Jennifer. «Why Napoleon Probably Should Have Just Stayed in Exile the First Time». Archived from the original on 25 June 2016.
- ^ a b c «PBS – Napoleon: Napoleon and Josephine». PBS. Archived from the original on 21 August 2017.
- ^ a b c McLynn 1998, p. 604
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 605
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 607
- ^ Chesney 2006, p. 35
- ^ Cordingly 2004, p. 254
- ^ Cox, Dale (2015). Nicolls’ outpost : a War of 1812 fort at Chattahoochee, Florida. Old Kitchen Books. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-692-37936-3.
- ^ Hibbert, Christopher (2003). Napoleon’s Women. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 272. ISBN 978-0-393-32499-0. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ^ Information, Reed Business (28 October 1982). «Napoleon’s moulds». New Scientist: 257.
- ^ Schom 1997, pp. 769–70
- ^ «Two Days at Saint Helena». The Spirit of the English Magazines. Monroe and Francis: 402. 1832. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- ^ Jones, David (14 October 1982). «The Singular Case of Napoleon’s Wallpaper». New Scientist: 101.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 642
- ^ «A JOURNEY TO ST. HELENA, HOME OF NAPOLEON’S LAST DAYS». Retrieved 18 March 2021.
- ^ I, Napoleon; Marchand, Louis Joseph (29 October 2017). Chronicles of Caesar’s Wars: The First-Ever Translation. Translated by Barzani, Arshan (1 ed.). Clio Books. Archived from the original on 3 December 2017.
- ^ Hicks, Peter. «Napoleon’s English Lessons». Napoleon.org. Archived from the original on 18 September 2016. Retrieved 24 March 2018.
- ^ a b Price, Munro (2014). «Epilogue: The Hundred Days». Napoleon: The End of Glory. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. p. 262. ISBN 978-0-19-966080-3.
- ^ a b Arnold (2011), p. 310.
- ^ «Napoleon I — Exile on St. Helena | Britannica». www.britannica.com. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ Henshaw (1870), p. 10.
- ^ Wilkins 1972
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 651
- ^ Zamoyski 2018, p. 638–639.
- ^ a b c McLynn 1998, p. 655
- ^ Roberts, Napoleon (2014) 799–801
- ^ «Napoleon had a ‘very small’ penis according to C4 show». The Independent. 4 April 2014. Archived from the original on 14 January 2021. Retrieved 13 January 2021.
- ^ Fulghum 2007
- ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 293–295
- ^ Driskel 1993, p. 168
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 656
- ^ Johnson 2002, pp. 180–181
- ^ a b c Cullen 2008, pp. 146–148
- ^ a b Cullen 2008, p. 156
- ^ Cullen 2008, p. 50
- ^ Cullen 2008, p. 161, and Hindmarsh et al. 2008, p. 2092
- ^ a b «L’Empire et le Saint-Siège». Napoleon.org. Archived from the original on 19 September 2011. Retrieved 15 June 2011.
- ^ Wachtel, Albert (1992). The Cracked Lookingglass: James Joyce and the Nightmare of History. Susquehanna University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-945636-27-4.
- ^ Joyce, James (2005). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Collector’s Library. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-904919-54-4.
- ^ «Napoleon’s «divorce»«. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
- ^ «catholictextbookproject.com». Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
- ^ Bledsoe, Albert Taylor; Herrick, Sophia M’Ilvaine Bledsoe (1871). «The Responsibility of Men for their Belief». The Southern review, Volume 9. p. 528. Retrieved 3 February 2021.
- ^ Confidential Correspondence of the Emperor Napoleon and the Empress Josephine: Including Letters from the Time of Their Marriage Until the Death of Josephine, and Also Several Private Letters from the Emperor to His Brother Joseph, and Other Important Personages. With Numerous Illustrative Notes … Mason Brothers. 1856. p. 359.
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and I have founded empires. But on what did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force. Jesus Christ founded his empire upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for him
- ^ Cyclopædia of Moral and Religious Anecdote [abridged from the larger «Cyclopædia» of K. Arvine], with an introductory essay by the Rev. George Cheever. J. J. Griffin & Company. 1851. p. 58.
- ^ Cases, Emmanuel-Auguste-Dieudonné comte de Las (1855). Memoirs of the Life, Exile, and Conversations of the Emperor Napoleon. Redfield.
- ^ William Roberts, «Napoleon, the Concordat of 1801, and Its Consequences». in by Frank J. Coppa, ed., Controversial Concordats: The Vatican’s Relations with Napoleon, Mussolini, and Hitler (1999) pp. 34–80.
- ^ Nigel Aston, Religion and revolution in France, 1780–1804 (Catholic University of America Press, 2000) pp. 279–315
- ^ Nigel Aston, Christianity and revolutionary Europe, 1750–1830 (Cambridge University Press, 2002) pp. 261–62.
- ^ Luis Granados (2012). Damned Good Company. Humanist Press. pp. 182–83. ISBN 978-0-931779-24-4. Archived from the original on 22 September 2015.
- ^ a b «When Napoleon Captured the Pope». The New York Times. 13 December 1981. Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
- ^ «Napoleon and the Pope: From the Concordat to the Excommunication». Archived from the original on 24 January 2018. Retrieved 23 January 2018.
- ^ «Concordat Of Fontainebleau». Archived from the original on 21 January 2018. Retrieved 20 January 2018.
- ^ «Pius VII | pope». Archived from the original on 2 May 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2017.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 436
- ^ a b Green, David B. (9 February 2014). «This Day in Jewish History / The Sanhedrin of Paris Convenes at the Behest of Napoleon». Haaretz. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
- ^ Schwarzfuchs 1979, p. 50
- ^ Cronin 1994, p. 315
- ^ «Napoleon Bonaparte». A few famous freemasons. Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon A.F. & A. M. Retrieved 9 June 2020.
- ^ Pieter Geyl, Napoleon, For and Against (1982)
- ^ George F.E. Rudé (1988). The French Revolution. Grove Weidenfeld. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-8021-3272-7. Archived from the original on 26 September 2015.
- ^ Jack Coggins (1966). Soldiers And Warriors: An Illustrated History. Courier Dover Publications. p. 187. ISBN 978-0-486-45257-9.
- ^ Sally Waller (2002). France in Revolution, 1776–1830. Heinemann. p. 188. ISBN 978-0-435-32732-3.
- ^ See David Chandler, «General Introduction» to his The Campaigns of Napoleon: The Mind and Method of History’s Greatest Soldier (1975).
- ^ Price, Munro (2014). «1: Napoleon and his Empire, December 1812». Napoleon: The End of Glory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-19-966080-3.
- ^ Roberts, Napoleon: A Life (2014) pp. 470–73
- ^ Gregory R. Copley (2007). The Art of Victory: Strategies for Personal Success and Global Survival in a Changing World. Simon and Schuster. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-4165-2478-6.
- ^ Dwyer 2013, pp. 175–76
- ^ Ellis, Geoffrey (16 May 2003). The Napoleonic Empire. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 125. ISBN 978-1-4039-4401-6.
- ^ J. M. Thompson, Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall (1954), p. 285
- ^ Christopher Hibbert (1999). Wellington: A Personal History. Da Capo Press. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-7382-0148-1.
- ^ Steven Englund, Napoleon: A Political Life (2004), pp. 379ff
- ^ van Crevald, Martin (1987). Command in War. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-674-14441-5.
- ^ «Napoleon Bonaparte (Character)». Internet Movie Database. Archived from the original on 18 November 2017. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ Bell 2007, p. 13
- ^ «Most Popular Napoleon Bonaparte Movies and TV Shows». Internet Movie Database. Retrieved 22 August 2020.
- ^ The German original, der größte Meister des Machiavellismus, means «the greatest master of Machiavellism» but is mistranslated and misspelled with capitalization as «the greatest Maestro of Machiavellism» in Bourke, Skinner, Richard, Quentin; Kelly, Duncan (2016). «11: Popular sovereignty as state theory in the nineteenth century». Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. University Printing House, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 280–281. ISBN 978-1-107-13040-1.
- ^ The Fortnightly, Volume 114. Chapman and Hall, 1923. p. 836.
- ^ Louis Antoine Fauvelet de Bourrienne. «Memoirs of Napoleon Bonaparte.» Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1889. Vol. 1, p. 7.
- ^ Kircheisen, F. M. Napoleon New York : Harcourt, Brace, 1932
- ^ Davydov, Denis. In the Service of the Tsar Against Napoleon: The Memoirs of Denis Davydov, 1806–1814. Translation by Gregory Troubetzkoy. Greenhill Books, 1999. p. 64.
- ^ «Greatest cartooning coup of all time: The Brit who convinced everyone Napoleon was short». National Post. 28 April 2016. Retrieved 30 September 2017.
- ^ Roberts 2004, p. 93
- ^ «Was Napoleon Short? | Britannica». www.britannica.com. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ a b c Owen Connelly (2006). Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military Campaigns. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- ^ «The Myth of Napoleon’s Height: How a Single Image Can Change History». Entity. 13 February 2017. Archived from the original on 5 January 2018. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
- ^ Seward, Desmond. Napoleon’s Family. New York: Viking, 1986.
- ^ The Bookman, Vol. 29, p. 304. Diary of Capt. Ross, commander of the Northumberland.
- ^ Bordes 2007, p. 118.
- ^ Hall 2006, p. 181
- ^ a b McGraw-Hill’s, US History 2012, pp. 112–13[clarification needed]
- ^ Blaufarb 2007, pp. 101–02
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 255
- ^ Bernard Schwartz (1998). The Code Napoleon and the Common-law World. The Lawbook Exchange. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-886363-59-5. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015.
- ^ Wood 2007, p. 55
- ^ Scheck 2008, Chapter: The Road to National Unification
- ^ Astarita 2005, p. 264
- ^ Alter 2006, pp. 61–76
- ^ Robert R. Palmer and Joel Colton, A History of the Modern World (New York: McGraw Hill, 1995), pp. 428–29
- ^ a b Archer et al. 2002, p. 397
- ^ Flynn 2001, p. 16
- ^ McConachy, Bruce (2001). «The Roots of Artillery Doctrine: Napoleonic Artillery Tactics Reconsidered» (PDF). The Journal of Military History. 65 (3): 617–640. doi:10.2307/2677528. JSTOR 2677528. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 January 2012.
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 383
- ^ John Shy, «Jomini» in Peter Paret, ed. Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (1986).
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 380
- ^ Roberts 2001, p. 272
- ^ Archer et al. 2002, p. 404
- ^ Hallock, William; Wade, Herbert T (1906). «Outlines of the evolution of weights and measures and the metric system». London: The Macmillan Company. pp. 66–69.
- ^ Denis Février. «Un historique du mètre» (in French). Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie. Archived from the original on 28 February 2011. Retrieved 10 March 2011.
- ^ Thierry Sabot (1 October 2000). «Les poids et mesures sous l’Ancien Régime» [The weights and measures of the Ancien Régime] (in French). histoire-genealogie. Archived from the original on 5 December 2010. Retrieved 10 February 2011.
- ^ O’Connor 2003
- ^ Clive Emsley (2014). Napoleon: Conquest, Reform and Reorganisation. Routledge. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-317-61028-1. Archived from the original on 18 October 2015.
- ^ a b Williams, L. Pearce (1956). «Science, Education and Napoleon I». Isis. 47 (4): 369–382. doi:10.1086/348507. JSTOR 226629. S2CID 144112149.
- ^ Margaret Bradley, «Scientific education versus military training: the influence of Napoleon Bonaparte on the École Polytechnique». Annals of science (1975) 32#5 pp. 415–49.
- ^ Roberts 2014, pp. 278–81
- ^ Hastings, Max (31 October 2014). «Everything is Owed to Glory». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 13 November 2014.
- ^ Charles Esdaile, Napoleon’s Wars: An International History 1803–1815 (2008), p. 39
- ^ Colin S. Gray (2007). War, Peace and International Relations: An Introduction to Strategic History. Routledge. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-134-16951-1. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015.
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 666
- ^ Repa, Jan (2 December 2005). «Furore over Austerlitz ceremony». BBC. Archived from the original on 20 April 2010. Retrieved 5 April 2010.
- ^ Bourke, Skinner, Richard, Quentin; Garstan, Bryan (2016). «10: From popular sovereignty to civil society in post-revolutionary France». Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. University Printing House, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. pp. 254–255, 258–259. ISBN 978-1-107-13040-1.
- ^ Poulos 2000
- ^ Geyl 1947
- ^ Dwyer 2008b
- ^ Chandler 1973, p. xliii.
- ^ Hanson 2003
- ^ Cronin 1994, pp. 342–43
- ^ Correlli Barnett, Bonaparte (1978)
- ^ Jean Tulard, Napoleon: The Myth of the Saviour (1984)
- ^ Bergeron, Louis (1981). France Under Napoleon. Princeton U.P. ISBN 978-0-691-00789-2.
- ^ Dominic Lieven, «Review article: Russia and the defeat of Napoleon.» Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History (2006) 7#2 pp. 283–308.
- ^ Robert S. Alexander, Napoleon (Oxford University Press, 2001), examines major debates among historians.
- ^ Western Society for French History (1974). Proceedings of the … Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History. Issues for have subtitle:Selected papers of the … Annual Meeting. Las Cruces, N.M.: New Mexico State University Press.
- ^ John Dunne, «Recent Napoleonic Historiography: ‘Poor Relation’ Makes Good?» French History (2004) 18#4 pp. 484–91.
- ^ Alan Forrest, «Propaganda and the Legitimation of Power in Napoleonic France». French History, 2004 18(4): 426–45
- ^ Richardson, Hubert N. B. (1920). A dictionary of Napoleon and his times. University of California Libraries. London, New York [etc.] : Cassell and company, ltd.
- ^ Mark, Bryant, «Broadsides against Boney.» History Today 60.1 (2010): 52+
- ^ Mark Bryant, Napoleonic Wars in Cartoons (Grub Street, 2009).
- ^ a b Sudhir Hazareesingh, «Memory and Political Imagination: the Legend of Napoleon Revisited». French History, 2004 18(4): 463–83
- ^ a b Venita Datta, «‘L’appel Au Soldat’: Visions of the Napoleonic Legend in Popular Culture of the Belle Epoque». French Historical Studies 2005 28(1): 1–30
- ^ «Call for Papers: International Napoleonic Society, Fourth International Napoleonic Congress». La Fondation Napoléon. Archived from the original on 8 January 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2008.
- ^ Laurent, Ottavi (8 February 2012). «A New Napoleonic Campaign for Montereau». Foundation Napoleon. Archived from the original on 29 September 2013.
- ^ Grab 2003, country by country analysis
- ^ «Napoleonic Code». Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 29 December 2011. Retrieved 13 April 2012.
- ^ Lobingier, Charles Sumner (December 1918). «Napoleon and His Code». Harvard Law Review. 32 (2): 114–134. doi:10.2307/1327640. ISSN 0017-811X. JSTOR 1327640.
- ^ Andrzej Nieuwazny, «Napoleon and Polish identity». History Today, May 1998 vol. 48 no. 5 pp. 50–55
- ^ «The Crisis of 1808». www.brown.edu. Brown University. Retrieved 6 May 2021.
- ^ «Яндекс». yandex.ru. Retrieved 20 August 2022.
- ^ «Biography of Joesephine de Beauharnais». Archived from the original on 28 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 117
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 271
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 118
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 284
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 188
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 100
- ^ a b McLynn 1998, p. 663
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 630
- ^ Lucotte, Gérard; Macé, Jacques & Hrechdakian, Peter (September 2013). «Reconstruction of the Lineage Y Chromosome Haplotype of Napoléon the First» (PDF). International Journal of Sciences. 2 (9): 127–39. ISSN 2305-3925. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 April 2014.
- ^ McLynn 1998, p. 423
References
Biographical studies
- Abbott, John (2005). Life of Napoleon Bonaparte. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4179-7063-6.
- Bell, David A. (2015). Napoleon: A Concise Biography. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6. only 140pp; by a scholar
- Blaufarb, Rafe (2007). Napoleon: Symbol for an Age, A Brief History with Documents. Bedford. ISBN 978-0-312-43110-5.
- Broers, Michael (2015). Napoleon: Soldier of Destiny. Faber & Faber. ISBN 978-0571273454.
- Chandler, David (2002). Napoleon. Leo Cooper. ISBN 978-0-85052-750-6.
- Cronin, Vincent (1994). Napoleon. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-637521-0.
- Dwyer, Philip (2008a). Napoleon: The Path to Power. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300137545.
- Dwyer, Philip (2013). Citizen Emperor: Napoleon in Power. Yale University Press. ASIN B00GGSG3W4.
- Englund, Steven (2010). Napoleon: A Political Life. Scribner. ISBN 978-0-674-01803-7.
- Gueniffey, Patrice. Bonaparte: 1769–1802 (Harvard UP, 2015, French edition 2013); 1008 pp.; vol 1 of most comprehensive recent scholarly biography by leading French specialist; less emphasis on battles and campaigns excerpt; also online review
- Johnson, Paul (2002). Napoleon: A life. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-670-03078-1.; 200 pp.; quite hostile
- Lefebvre, Georges (1969). Napoleon from 18 Brumaire to Tilsit, 1799–1807. Columbia University Press. influential wide-ranging history
- Lefebvre, Georges (1969). Napoleon: from Tilsit to Waterloo, 1807–1815. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231033138.
- Lyons, Martyn (1994). Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. St. Martin’s Press.
- Markham, Felix (1963). Napoleon. Mentor.; 303 pp.; short biography by an Oxford scholar online
- McLynn, Frank (1998). Napoleon. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-6247-5. ASIN 0712662472.
- Roberts, Andrew (2014). Napoleon: A Life. Penguin Group. ISBN 978-0-670-02532-9.
- Thompson, J.M. (1951). Napoleon Bonaparte: His Rise and Fall. Oxford U.P., 412 pp.; by an Oxford scholar
- Zamoyski, Adam (2018). Napoleon: The Man Behind The Myth. Great Britain: HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-811607-1.
Primary sources
- Babelon, Jean-Pierre, D’Huart, Suzanne and De Jonge, Alex. Napoleon’s Last Will and Testament. Paddington Press Ltd. New York & London. 1977. ISBN 0-448-22190-X.
- Broadley, A. M., and J. Holland Rose. Napoleon in caricature 1795–1821 (John Lane, 1911) online, illustrated
- Gourgaud, Gaspard (1903) [1899]. Talks of Napoleon at St. Helena. Translated from the French by Elizabeth Wormeley Latimer. Chicago: A.C. McClurg.
Historiography and memory
- Broadley, Alexander Meyrick (1911). Napoleon in Caricature 1795-1821. John Lane, 1911 Caricature.
- Dwyer, Philip G. (2004). «Napoleon Bonaparte as Hero and Saviour: Image, Rhetoric and Behaviour in the Construction of a Legend». French History. 18 (4): 379–403. doi:10.1093/fh/18.4.379.
- Dwyer, Philip (2008b). «Remembering and Forgetting in Contemporary France: Napoleon, Slavery, and the French History Wars». French Politics, Culture & Society. 26 (3): 110–22. doi:10.3167/fpcs.2008.260306.
- Englund, Steven. «Napoleon and Hitler». Journal of the Historical Society (2006) 6#1 pp. 151–69.
- Geyl, Pieter (1982) [1947]. Napoleon For and Against. Penguin Books.
- Hanson, Victor Davis (2003). «The Claremont Institute: The Little Tyrant, A review of Napoleon: A Penguin Life«. The Claremont Institute.
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir (2005). The Legend of Napoleon. excerpt and text search
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir. «Memory and Political Imagination: The Legend of Napoleon Revisited», French History (2004) 18#4 pp. 463–83.
- Hazareesingh, Sudhir (2005). «Napoleonic Memory in Nineteenth-Century France: The Making of a Liberal Legend». MLN. 120 (4): 747–73. doi:10.1353/mln.2005.0119. S2CID 154508777.
- Porterfield, Todd, and Susan Siegfried. Staging Empire: Napoleon, Ingres, and David (Penn State Press, 2006). online review.
Specialty studies
- Alder, Ken (2002). The Measure of All Things – The Seven-Year Odyssey and Hidden Error That Transformed the World. Free Press. ISBN 978-0-7432-1675-3.
- Alter, Peter (2006). T. C. W. Blanning and Hagen Schulze (ed.). Unity and Diversity in European Culture c. 1800. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-726382-2.
- Amini, Iradj (2000). Napoleon and Persia. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-934211-58-1.
- Archer, Christon I.; Ferris, John R.; Herwig, Holger H. (2002). World History of Warfare. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-4423-8.
- Astarita, Tommaso (2005). Between Salt Water And Holy Water: A History Of Southern Italy. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-05864-2.
- Bell, David (2007). The First Total War. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-618-34965-4.
- Bordes, Philippe (2007). Jacques-Louis David. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12346-3.
- Brooks, Richard (2000). Atlas of World Military History. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-7607-2025-7.
- Chandler, David (1966). The Campaigns of Napoleon. New York: Scribner. ISBN 978-0-02-523660-8. OCLC 740560411.
- Chandler, David (1973) [1966]. Napoleon. ISBN 978-0841502543.
- Chesney, Charles (2006). Waterloo Lectures:A Study Of The Campaign Of 1815. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4286-4988-0.
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2018). Napoleon’s 1796 Italian Campaign. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2676-2
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2020). Napoleon Absent, Coalition Ascendant: The 1799 Campaign in Italy and Switzerland, Volume 1. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-3025-7
- Clausewitz, Carl von (2021). The Coalition Crumbles, Napoleon Returns: The 1799 Campaign in Italy and Switzerland, Volume 2. Trans and ed. Nicholas Murray and Christopher Pringle. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-3034-9
- Connelly, Owen (2006). Blundering to Glory: Napoleon’s Military Campaigns. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- Cordingly, David (2004). The Billy Ruffian: The Bellerophon and the Downfall of Napoleon. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-58234-468-3.
- Cullen, William (2008). Is Arsenic an Aphrodisiac?. Royal Society of Chemistry. ISBN 978-0-85404-363-7.
- Dobi.A. 1974. “For the Emperor-Bibliophile, Only the Very Best.” Wilson Library Bulletin 49 (November): 229–33.
- Driskel, Paul (1993). As Befits a Legend. Kent State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87338-484-1.
- Esdaile, Charles J. (2003). The Peninsular War: A New History. Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4039-6231-7.
- Flynn, George Q. (2001). Conscription and democracy: The Draft in France, Great Britain, and the United States. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-31912-9.
- Fremont-Barnes, Gregory; Fisher, Todd (2004). The Napoleonic Wars: The Rise and Fall of an Empire. Osprey. ISBN 978-1-84176-831-1.
- Fulghum, Neil (2007). «Death Mask of Napoleon». University of North Carolina. Archived from the original on 26 July 2013. Retrieved 4 August 2008.
- Gates, David (2001). The Spanish Ulcer: A History of the Peninsular War. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-81083-1.
- Gates, David (2003). The Napoleonic Wars, 1803–1815. Pimlico. ISBN 978-0-7126-0719-3.
- Gill, John H. (2014). 1809: Thunder on the Danube – Napoleon’s Defeat of the Habsburgs, Vol. 1. London: Frontline Books. ISBN 978-184415-713-6.
- Glover, Richard (1967). «The French Fleet, 1807–1814; Britain’s Problem; and Madison’s Opportunity». The Journal of Modern History. 39 (3): 233–52. doi:10.1086/240080. S2CID 143376566.
- Godechot, Jacques; et al. (1971). The Napoleonic era in Europe. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN 978-0-03-084166-8.
- Grab, Alexander (2003). Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-68275-3.
- Hall, Stephen (2006). Size Matters. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-618-47040-2.
- Harvey, Robert (2006). The War of Wars. Robinson. ISBN 978-1-84529-635-3.
- Hindmarsh, J. Thomas; Savory, John (2008). «The Death of Napoleon, Cancer or Arsenic?». Clinical Chemistry. 54 (12): 2092. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.117358. Archived from the original on 26 December 2010. Retrieved 10 October 2010.
- Karsh, Inari (2001). Empires of the Sand: The Struggle for Mastery in the Middle East, 1789–1923. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-00541-9.
- Mowat, R.B. (1924) The Diplomacy of Napoleon (1924) 350 pp. online
- O’Connor, J; Robertson, E F (2003). «The history of measurement». St Andrew’s University. Retrieved 18 July 2008.
- Poulos, Anthi (2000). «1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict». International Journal of Legal Information (vol 28 ed.). 28: 1–44. doi:10.1017/S0731126500008842. S2CID 159202400.
- Richardson, Hubert N.B. A Dictionary of Napoleon and His Times (1921) online free 489pp
- Roberts, Chris (2004). Heavy Words Lightly Thrown. Granta. ISBN 978-1-86207-765-2.
- Schom, Alan (1997). Napoleon Bonaparte. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-017214-5.
- Schroeder, Paul W. (1996). The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848. Oxford U.P. pp. 177–560. ISBN 978-0-19-820654-5. advanced diplomatic history of Napoleon and his era
- Schwarzfuchs, Simon (1979). Napoleon, the Jews and the Sanhedrin. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-19-710023-3.
- Watson, William (2003). Tricolor and crescent. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-275-97470-1. Retrieved 12 June 2009.
- Sicker, Martin (2001). The Islamic World in Decline: From the Treaty of Karlowitz to the Disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. Greenwood. p. 99. ISBN 978-0-275-96891-5.
- Wells, David (1992). The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-011813-1.
External links
- The Napoleonic Guide
- Napoleon Series
- International Napoleonic Society
- Biography by the US Public Broadcasting Service
- Works by Napoleon at Project Gutenberg
- Hit the road with Napoleon
- Rose, John Holland (1911). «Napoleon I.» . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 19 (11th ed.). pp. 190–211.
Наполеон | ||
---|---|---|
Император Наполеон в своем кабинете в Тюильри, от Жак-Луи Давид, 1812 |
||
Император французов | ||
1-е правление | 18 мая 1804 г. — 6 апреля 1814 г. | |
Коронация | 2 декабря 1804 г. Собор Нотр-Дам |
|
2-е правление | 20 марта 1815 — 22 июня 1815 | |
Преемник | Наполеон II (оспаривается) | |
Король Италии | ||
Царствовать | 17 марта 1805 — 11 апреля 1814 | |
Коронация | 26 мая 1805 г. Миланский собор |
|
Защитник Конфедерации Рейна | ||
В офисе | 12 июля 1806-19 октября 1813 г. | |
Президент Итальянской Республики | ||
В офисе | 26 января 1802 г. — 17 марта 1805 г. | |
Первый консул Франции | ||
В офисе | 10 ноября 1799 г. — 18 мая 1804 г. | |
Со-консулы | Жан Жак Режи Шарль-Франсуа Лебрен |
|
Родился | Наполеоне ди Буонапарте 15 августа 1769 г. Аяччо, Корсика, Королевство Франция |
|
Умер | 5 мая 1821 г. (51 год) Лонгвуд, остров Святой Елены |
|
Захоронение | 15 декабря 1840 г.
Les Invalides, Париж, Франция |
|
Супруга |
Жозефина де Богарне (м. ; div. ) Мария Луиза Австрии (м. ) |
|
Проблема Деталь |
Наполеон II | |
|
||
жилой дом | Бонапарт | |
Отец | Карло Буонапарте | |
Мама | Летиция Рамолино | |
Религия | Римский католицизм Смотрите подробности |
|
Подпись
Герб |
Наполеон Бонапарт (;[1] Французский: Наполеон [napɔleɔ̃ bɔnapaʁt]; Корсиканский: Набулионе; Итальянский: Наполеон; 15 августа 1769 — 5 мая 1821) был французским государственным деятелем и военачальником, руководившим много успешных кампаний в течение французская революция и Французские революционные войны, и был Император французов (так как Наполеон I) с 1804 по 1814 год и снова ненадолго в 1815 году во время Сто дней. Наполеон доминировал в европейских и мировых делах более десяти лет, ведя Францию против ряда коалиций во время войны. Наполеоновские войны. Он выиграл многие из этих войн и подавляющее большинство своих сражений, построив большая империя который правил большей частью континентальной Европы до ее окончательного краха в 1815 году. Наполеон считается одним из величайших полководцев в истории, а его войны и кампании изучаются в военных школах по всему миру. Его политическое и культурное наследие сделало его одним из самых известных и противоречивых лидеров в истории человечества.[2][3]
Родился Наполеоне ди Буонапарте (Итальянский:[napoleˈoːne di bwɔnaˈparte]) в Корсика через несколько месяцев после молодой независимой республика был присоединен Королевство Франция, Скромная семья Наполеона произошла от несовершеннолетних Итальянское дворянство. Он служил офицером артиллерии в Французская Королевская Армия когда в 1789 году разразилась Французская революция. Он быстро поднялся по служебной лестнице, воспользовавшись новыми возможностями, открытыми революцией, и стал генералом в 24 года. Французский справочник в конце концов дал ему команду Армия Италии после того, как он подавил 13 Vendémiaire восстание против правительства восставших роялистов. В 26 лет он начал свой первая военная кампания против австрийцев и итальянских монархов, объединившихся с Габсбургами в Война Первой коалиции — побеждать практически в каждой битве, завоевывать Итальянский полуостров за год при установлении «братские республики «при местной поддержке и став героем войны во Франции.
В 1798 году он возглавил военная экспедиция в Египет это послужило трамплином к политической власти. Он организовал переворот в ноябре 1799 г. и стал Первый консул Республики. После Амьенского мира 1802 года Наполеон обратил внимание на французские колонии. Он продал Территория Луизианы в Соединенные Штаты, и он попытался восстановить рабство французских колоний Карибского бассейна. Однако, несмотря на то, что ему удалось восстановить рабство в восточной части Карибского бассейна, Наполеон потерпел неудачу в своих попытках подчинить себе Сен-Доминго, и колония, которую Франция когда-то гордо хвастала как «Жемчужина Антильских островов», стала независимой как Гаити в 1804 году. Амбиции и общественное одобрение Наполеона вдохновили его пойти дальше, и в 1804 году он стал первым французским императором. Баланс сил в Европе разрушился, неразрешимые разногласия с британцами означали, что французы вскоре столкнулись с проблемой Третья коалиция к 1805 г. Наполеон одержал победу над этой коалицией, одержав решительные победы в Ульмская кампания и исторический успех над Российская империя и Австрийская Империя на Битва при Аустерлице что привело к распад Священной Римской Империи.
Наполеон сформировал Франко-персидский союз и хотел восстановить Франко-индийские союзы с Мусульманин Индийский император Типу Султан предоставив во время Англо-майсурские войны, с постоянной целью иметь в конечном итоге открытый способ атаковать Британцы в Индии.[4][5] В 1806 г. Четвертая коалиция поднял на него оружие, потому что Пруссия стал беспокоиться о французской континентальной экспансии. Наполеон быстро победил Пруссию на битвы при Йене и Ауэрштедте, затем прошел свой Grande Armée глубоко в Восточная Европа и уничтожил русских в июне 1807 г. Битва при Фридланде. Затем Франция вынудила побежденные страны Четвертой коалиции подписать Тильзитские договоры в июле 1807 года, что принесло на континент непростой мир. Тильзит означал высшую точку Французской империи. В 1809 году австрийцы и британцы снова бросили вызов французам во время Война пятой коалиции, но Наполеон укрепил свою власть над Европой после победы на Битва при Ваграме в июле.
Наполеон тогда оккупировал Пиренейский полуостров, надеясь продлить Континентальная система и перекрыл британскую торговлю с материковой Европой, и объявил, что его брат Жозеф Бонапарт то Король Испании в 1808 году. Испанцы и португальцы восстали при поддержке Великобритании. В Полуостровная война длилась шесть лет, показала обширную партизанская война, и закончилась победой союзников в 1814 году. Континентальная система вызвала повторяющиеся дипломатические конфликты между Францией и ее подчиненными государствами, особенно Россией. Русские не желали нести экономические последствия сокращения торговли и регулярно нарушали континентальную систему, вовлекая Наполеона в новую войну. Французы начали крупную вторжение в россию летом 1812 года. Поход разрушил русские города, но не принес решающей победы, которую хотел Наполеон. Это привело к краху Grande Armée и вдохновил его врагов на новое наступление на Наполеона.
В 1813 году Пруссия и Австрия объединили русские войска в Война Шестой коалиции против Франции. Длительная военная кампания завершилась победой большой армии союзников над Наполеоном в Битва при лейпциге в октябре 1813 г., но его тактическая победа на малом Битва при Ханау позволил отступить на французскую землю. Тогда союзники вторгся во Францию и захватил Париж весной 1814 года, вынудив Наполеона отречься от престола в апреле. Он был сослан на остров Эльба от побережья Тоскана, а Династия Бурбонов был восстановлен к власти. Наполеон сбежал с Эльбы в феврале 1815 года и снова взял под свой контроль Францию. Союзники ответили формированием Седьмая коалиция который победил его на Битва при Ватерлоо в июне. Он был сослан на далекий британский остров Святой Елены в Южной Атлантике, где он умер шесть лет спустя в возрасте 51 года.
Влияние Наполеона на современный мир привело к либеральным реформам на многочисленных территориях, которые он завоевал и контролировал, таких как Низкие страны, Швейцария, и большие части современного Италия и Германия. Он проводил фундаментальную либеральную политику во Франции и по всей Западной Европе. Его Наполеоновский кодекс оказал влияние на правовые системы более 70 стран мира. Британский историк Эндрю Робертс гласит: «Идеи, лежащие в основе нашего современного мира — меритократия, равенство перед законом, права собственности, религиозная терпимость, современное светское образование, надежные финансы и т. д. — отстаивались, консолидировались, систематизировались и географически расширялись Наполеоном. добавили рациональное и эффективное местное управление, конец сельскому бандитизму, поощрение науки и искусства, отмену феодализма и величайшую кодификацию законов со времен падение римской империи «.[6]
Ранние годы
Семья Наполеона состояла из Итальянский происхождение: его предки по отцовской линии, Буонапарты, произошли от несовершеннолетних Тосканский знатная семья, эмигрировавшая в Корсика в 16 веке; в то время как его предки по материнской линии, Рамолинос, произошли от несовершеннолетних Генуэзец дворянская семья.[7] «Я скорее итальянец или тосканец, чем корсиканец», — сказал Наполеон, и многие потомки итальянских колонистов на Корсике считали себя таковыми, но на самом деле ничто не связывало их с деревнями, которые они считали «родиной», земли, оставленные их предками, чтобы поселиться в корсиканских городах. Возможно, они представились континентальными из-за стремления к чести и отличия, но это не доказывает, что они действительно были такими чужеземцами, как сами часто себе представляли. Можно сказать, что они становились все более привязанными к своему итальянскому происхождению по мере того, как они удалялись все дальше и дальше от них, становясь все более глубоко интегрированными в корсиканское общество через браки. Это относилось к Буонапартесам так же, как и ко всем остальным, связанным с генуэзской и тосканской знати в силу титулов, которые, по правде говоря, вызывали подозрение. Буонапарты также были родственниками по браку и по рождению Пьетрасентам, Костасу, Паравиччини и Бонеллисам, всем корсиканским семьям из внутренних районов.[8] Его родители Карло Мария ди Буонапарте и Мария Летиция Рамолино поддерживал родовой дом под названием «Casa Buonaparte » в Аяччо. Наполеон родился там 15 августа 1769 года, у них четвертый ребенок и третий сын. Сначала родились мальчик и девочка, но умерли в младенчестве. У него был старший брат, Джозеф, и младшие братья и сестры Люсьен, Элиза, Луи, Полина, Кэролайн, и Жером. Наполеон крестился как Католик.[9] В юности его имя также писалось как Набулионе, Набулио, Napolionne, и Напулионе.[10]
Наполеон родился в том же году Республика Генуя уступила Корсику Франции.[11] Государство продано суверенные права за год до его рождения в 1768 году, и остров был завоеванный Францией в год его рождения и официально зарегистрирован как провинция в 1770 г., после 500 лет под властью генуэзцев и 14 лет независимости.[а] Родители Наполеона присоединились к корсиканскому сопротивлению и боролись против французов, чтобы сохранить независимость, даже когда Мария была беременна им. Его отец был поверенным, которого впоследствии назвали представителем Корсики в суде Людовик XVI в 1777 г.[15]
Наибольшее влияние в детстве Наполеона оказала его мать, чья жесткая дисциплина сдерживала непослушного ребенка.[15] Позже Наполеон заявил: «Дальнейшая судьба ребенка — это всегда дело матери».[16] Бабушка Наполеона по материнской линии вышла замуж за швейцарца. Fesch семья в ее втором браке, и дядя Наполеона, кардинал Джозеф Феш, несколько лет выполнял роль защитника семьи Бонапартов. Благородное, умеренно богатое прошлое Наполеона давало ему больше возможностей для учебы, чем было доступно типичному корсиканцу того времени.[17]
Статуя Неполеона школьником в Бриенне, 15 лет
Когда ему исполнилось 9 лет,[18][19] он переехал в материковая часть Франции и поступил в религиозную школу в г. Autun в январе 1779 года. В мае он со стипендией перешел в военная академия в Бриен-ле-Шато.[20] В юности он был откровенным Корсиканский националист и поддерживал независимость государства от Франции.[нужен лучший источник ][18] Как и многие корсиканцы, Наполеон говорил и читал Корсиканский (как его родной язык) и Итальянский (как официальный язык Корсики).[21][22][23] Он начал учиться Французский в школе примерно в 10 лет.[24] Хотя он свободно говорил по-французски, он говорил с характерным корсиканским акцентом и так и не научился правильно писать по-французски.[25] Однако он не был единичным случаем, поскольку в 1790 году было подсчитано, что менее 3 миллионов человек из 28-миллионного населения Франции могли говорить на стандартном французском языке, а тех, кто умел на нем писать, было еще меньше.[26]
Наполеон регулярно подвергался издевательствам со стороны своих сверстников за его акцент, место рождения, низкий рост, манеры и неспособность быстро говорить по-французски.[22] Бонапарт стал сдержанным и меланхоличным, принявшись за чтение. Экзаменатор заметил, что Наполеон «всегда отличался своими математическими способностями. Он довольно хорошо знаком с историей и географией … Из этого мальчика получился бы отличный моряк».[b][28] В раннем взрослом возрасте он ненадолго намеревался стать писателем; он написал историю Корсики и романтический новелла.[18]
По завершении учебы в Бриенне в 1784 году Наполеон был принят в École Militaire в Париже. Он прошел подготовку, чтобы стать артиллерийским офицером, и, когда смерть отца снизила его доход, был вынужден закончить двухгодичный курс за один год.[29] Он был первым корсиканцем, окончившим École Militaire.[29] Его обследовал знаменитый ученый. Пьер-Симон Лаплас.[30]
Ранняя карьера
После выпуска в сентябре 1785 г. Бонапарт был заказанный а Второй лейтенант в La Fère артиллерийский полк.[c][20] Он служил в Валентность и Auxonne до начала революции в 1789 году. Молодой человек все еще был ярым корсиканским националистом в то время и попросил разрешения присоединиться к своему наставнику. Паскуале Паоли, когда Национальное собрание разрешило последнему вернуться на Корсику. Паоли не питал симпатии к Наполеону, так как считал своего отца предателем за то, что он оставил свое дело ради корсиканской независимости.
Он провел первые годы революции на Корсике, сражаясь в сложной трехсторонней борьбе между роялистами, революционерами и корсиканскими националистами. Наполеон, однако, принял идеалы революции, став сторонником Якобинцы и присоединение к профранцузским корсиканским республиканцам, которые выступали против политики Паоли и его стремления к отделению.[32] Ему было поручено командовать батальоном добровольцев, и в июле 1792 года он был произведен в капитаны регулярной армии, несмотря на то, что он превысил отпуск и возглавил бунт против французских войск.[33]
Наполеон и его приверженность делу французская революция таким образом вступил в конфликт с Паоли, который решил саботировать вклад корсиканцев в Expédition de Sardaigne, предотвращая французское нападение на Сардинский остров Ла Маддалена.[34] Бонапарт и его семья были вынуждены бежать на материковую часть Франции в июне 1793 года из-за раскола с Паоли.[35] Хотя он родился «Наполеоне ди Буонапарт», именно после этого Наполеон начал называть себя «Наполеон Бонапарт», но его семья не отказывалась от имени Буонапарт до 1796 года. Первое известное свидетельство о том, что он подписал свое имя как Бонапарт, был в этом возрасте из 27 (в 1796 г.).[36][9][37]
Осада Тулона
В июле 1793 года Бонапарт опубликовал прореспубликанский памфлет под названием Le souper de Beaucaire (Ужин в Beaucaire ), который получил поддержку Огюстен Робеспьер, младший брат революционного лидера Максимилиан Робеспьер. С помощью своего товарища-корсиканца Антуан Кристоф Саличети Бонапарт был назначен командующим артиллерией республиканских войск при осаде Тулона.[38]
Он принял план захвата холма, на котором республиканские орудия могли доминировать над гаванью города и вынудить британцев эвакуироваться. Штурм позиции привел к захвату города, но при этом Бонапарт получил ранение в бедро. Он был повышен до бригадный генерал в возрасте 24 лет. Привлекая внимание Комитет общественной безопасности, его поставили руководить артиллерией французской Армия Италии.[39]
Наполеон работал инспектором прибрежных укреплений на берегу Средиземного моря недалеко от Марсель пока он ждал подтверждения почты армии Италии. Он разработал планы нападения на Королевство Сардиния в рамках кампании Франции против Первой Коалиции. Огюстен Робеспьер и Саличети были готовы выслушать недавно назначенного артиллерийского генерала.[40]
Французская армия осуществила план Бонапарта в Битва при Саорджио в апреле 1794 г., а затем двинулся на захват Ормеа В горах. Из Ормеа они направились на запад, чтобы обойти австро-сардинские позиции вокруг Saorge. После этой кампании Огюстен Робеспьер послал Бонапарта с миссией в Республика Генуя чтобы определить намерения этой страны по отношению к Франции.[41]
13 Vendémiaire
Некоторые современники утверждали, что Бонапарт попал под домашний арест в Ницца за его связь с Робеспьерами после их падения в Термидорианская реакция в июле 1794 г., но секретарь Наполеона Бурриен оспаривал это утверждение в своих мемуарах. Согласно Бурриену, причиной была зависть между Альпийской армией и армией Италии (к которой в то время был прикомандирован Наполеон).[42] Бонапарт страстно защищался в письме комиссару Саличети, и впоследствии он был оправдан в любом проступке.[43] Он был освобожден в течение двух недель, и из-за его технических навыков его попросили составить план атаки итальянских позиций в контексте войны Франции с Австрией. Он также принимал участие в экспедиции, чтобы вернуть Корсику у британцев, но французы были отброшены британским королевским флотом.[44]
К 1795 году Бонапарт был помолвлен с Дезире Клэри, дочь Франсуа Клэри. Сестра Дезире Джули Клэри вышла замуж за старшего брата Бонапарта Жозефа.[45] В апреле 1795 г. он был назначен в Армия Запада, которая занималась Война в Вандеи — гражданская война и роялист контрреволюция в Вандеи, регионе на западе центральной части Франции на Атлантический океан. Как пехотное командование, это было понижение в звании с генерала артиллерии — на которое армия уже имела полную квоту — и он сослался на плохое здоровье, чтобы избежать назначения.[46]
Его перевели в Бюро Топография Комитета общественной безопасности и безуспешно пытались передать Константинополь чтобы предложить свои услуги Султан.[47] В этот период он написал романтическую новеллу. Клиссон и Эжени о солдате и его возлюбленной, что является явной параллелью к отношениям Бонапарта с Дезире.[48] 15 сентября Бонапарт был исключен из списка генералов регулярной службы за отказ участвовать в кампании Вандеи. Он столкнулся с тяжелым финансовым положением и ухудшением карьерных перспектив.[49]
3 октября роялисты в Париже объявили восстание против Национальное собрание.[50] Поль Баррас, лидер термидорианской реакции, знал о военных подвигах Бонапарта в Тулоне и поручил ему командовать импровизированными силами в защиту конвенции в Дворец Тюильри. Наполеон видел резня королевской швейцарской гвардии там тремя годами ранее и понял, что артиллерия будет ключом к его защите.[20]
Он приказал молодому кавалерийскому офицеру по имени Иоахим Мюрат захватить большой пушки и использовал их для отражения нападавших 5 октября 1795 г.13 Vendémiaire An IV в Французский республиканский календарь; 1400 роялистов погибли, остальные бежали.[50] Он очистил улицы с «запахом картечь «, по мнению историка XIX века Томас Карлайл в Французская революция: история.[51][52]
Поражение восстания роялистов устранило угрозу Конвенту и принесло Бонапарту внезапную славу, богатство и покровительство нового правительства. Каталог. Мурат женился на одной из сестер Наполеона, став его зятем; он также служил при Наполеоне в качестве одного из его генералов. Бонапарт был назначен главнокомандующим внутренних дел и командовал армией Италии.[35]
Через несколько недель у него возникли романтические отношения с Жозефина де Богарне, бывшая любовница Барраса. Пара поженилась 9 марта 1796 года в рамках гражданской церемонии.[53]
Первая итальянская кампания
Через два дня после свадьбы Бонапарт покинул Париж, чтобы принять командование армией Италии. Он немедленно перешел в наступление, надеясь разбить силы Пьемонт прежде чем их австрийские союзники смогли вмешаться. В серии стремительных побед во время Кампания Монтенотта, он выбил Пьемонт из войны за две недели. Затем французы сосредоточили внимание на австрийцах на оставшуюся часть войны, кульминацией которой стали затяжные борьба за мантую. Австрийцы предприняли серию атак против французов, чтобы прорвать осаду, но Наполеон нанес поражение всем усилиям по оказанию помощи, одерживая победы в сражениях при Кастильоне, Бассано, Арколе, и Риволи. Решительный триумф французов при Риволи в январе 1797 г. привел к краху австрийских позиций в Италии. При Риволи австрийцы потеряли до 14 000 человек, а французы — около 5 000 человек.[54]
Следующим этапом кампании было французское вторжение в Габсбург сердце. Французские войска в Южной Германии потерпели поражение от Эрцгерцог Карл в 1796 году, но эрцгерцог отозвал свои войска для защиты Вены, узнав о нападении Наполеона. В первом столкновении двух командиров Наполеон отбросил своего противника и продвинулся вглубь австрийской территории после победы на Битва при Тарвисе в марте 1797 года. Австрийцы были встревожены французским наступлением, которое достигло Леобен, примерно в 100 км от Вены, и наконец решил просить мира.[55] В Леобенский договор, за которым следует более полный Договор Кампо Формио, дал Франции контроль над большей частью северной Италии и Низкие страны, а секретный пункт обещал Республика Венеция в Австрию. Бонапарт двинулся на Венецию и заставил ее сдаться, положив конец 1100 годам независимости. Он также уполномочил французов грабить сокровища, такие как Лошади Святого Марка.[56]
Бонапарт во время итальянской кампании 1797 г.
Его применение обычных военных идей к ситуациям реального мира позволило ему добиться военного успеха, например, творческого использования артиллерии в качестве мобильной силы для поддержки своей пехоты. Позже он заявил:[когда? ] «Я участвовал в шестидесяти битвах и не научился тому, чего не знал вначале. Посмотрите на Цезаря: он сражался с первым, как с последним».[57]
Бонапарт мог побеждать в сражениях, скрывая расстановку войск и концентрируя свои силы на «петлях» ослабленного фронта противника. Если бы он не мог использовать свою любимую стратегия охвата, он занимал центральную позицию и атаковал две взаимодействующие силы у их петель, поворачивался, чтобы сражаться с одной, пока та не убегал, а затем поворачивался лицом к другой.[58] В этой итальянской кампании армия Бонапарта захватила 150 000 пленных, 540 орудий и 170 человек. стандарты.[59] Французская армия провела 67 боев и выиграла 18 решительные сражения с помощью превосходной артиллерийской техники и тактики Бонапарта.[60]
Во время кампании Бонапарт становился все более влиятельным во французской политике. Он основал две газеты: одну для солдат своей армии и другую для распространения во Франции.[61] Роялисты напали на Бонапарта за разграбление Италии и предупредили, что он может стать диктатором.[62] Войска Наполеона извлекли из Италии около 45 миллионов долларов в ходе своей кампании, еще 12 миллионов долларов — драгоценными металлами и драгоценностями.Его войска также конфисковали более трехсот бесценных картин и скульптур.[63]
Бонапарт послал генерала Пьер Ожеро в Париж, чтобы возглавить государственный переворот и произведут чистку от роялистов 4 сентября -Переворот 18 Fructidor. Это оставило Баррас и его союзников-республиканцев снова под контролем, но в зависимости от Бонапарта, который приступил к мирным переговорам с Австрией. Эти переговоры привели к Договор Кампо Формио, а Бонапарт вернулся в Париж в декабре как герой.[64] Он встретил Талейран Нового министра иностранных дел Франции, который служил в той же должности при императоре Наполеоне, и они начали готовиться к вторжению в Британию.[35]
Египетская экспедиция
После двух месяцев планирования Бонапарт решил, что военно-морская мощь Франции еще недостаточно сильна, чтобы противостоять британскому королевскому флоту. Он решил совершить военную экспедицию, чтобы захватить Египет и тем самым подорвать доступ Великобритании к его территории. торговые интересы в Индии.[35] Бонапарт хотел установить французское присутствие на Ближнем Востоке, связавшись с Типу Султан, то Султан Майсура что боролись с длинной четверкой Англо-майсурские войны во время британского вторжения в Индия.[65] Наполеон заверил Директорию, что «как только он завоюет Египет, он установит отношения с индийскими князьями и вместе с ними нападет на англичан, находящихся в их владениях».[66] Директория согласилась, чтобы обеспечить торговый путь в Индию.[67]
В мае 1798 года Бонапарт был избран членом Французская Академия Наук. Его египетская экспедиция включала группу из 167 ученых, включая математиков, естествоиспытателей, химиков и других ученых. геодезисты из их. Их открытия включали Розеттский камень, и их работа была опубликована в Описание de l’Égypte в 1809 г.[68]
По пути в Египет Бонапарт достиг Мальта 9 июня 1798 г., затем контролировался Рыцари-госпитальеры. Великий Мастер Фердинанд фон Хомпеш цу Больхейм сдался после символического сопротивления, и Бонапарт захватил важную военно-морскую базу, потеряв всего трех человек.[69]
Генерал Бонапарт и его экспедиция избежали преследования Королевского флота и приземлились в Александрия 1 июля.[35] Он боролся с Битва при Шубра Хите против Мамлюки, Правящая военная каста Египта. Это помогло французам отработать тактику защиты на Битва пирамид, сражался 21 июля, примерно в 24 км (15 миль) от пирамиды. Силы генерала Бонапарта численностью 25 000 человек примерно равнялись силам египетской конницы мамлюков. Двадцать девять французских[70] и примерно 2000 египтян были убиты. Победа подняла боевой дух французской армии.[71]
1 августа 1798 г. британский флот под Сэр Горацио Нельсон захватили или уничтожили все французские суда, кроме двух, в Битва за Нил, победив цель Бонапарта укрепить французские позиции в Средиземноморье.[72] Его армия преуспела во временном усилении французской власти в Египте, хотя столкнулась с неоднократными восстаниями.[73] В начале 1799 года он двинул армию в Османская провинция Дамаска (Сирия и Галилея ). Бонапарт повел 13000 французских солдат на завоевание прибрежных городов Ариш, Газы, Яффо, и Хайфа.[74] В нападение на Яффо был особенно жестоким. Бонапарт обнаружил, что многие из защитников были бывшими военнопленными, якобы на условно-досрочное освобождение, поэтому он приказал казнить гарнизон и 1400 заключенных штыком или утопить, чтобы спасти от пуль.[72] Мужчин, женщин и детей грабили и убивали в течение трех дней.[75]
Бонапарт начал с армией в 13 000 человек; 1500 пропали без вести, 1200 погибли в боях и тысячи погибли от болезней, в основном бубонная чума. Он не смог уменьшить крепость из Акко, поэтому в мае он отправил свою армию обратно в Египет. Чтобы ускорить отступление, Бонапарт приказал отравить больных чумой опиумом; число погибших остается спорным: от 30 до 580 человек. Он также вывел 1000 раненых.[76] Вернувшись в Египет 25 июля, Бонапарт победил Османское морское вторжение в Абукир.[77]
Правитель Франции
Генерал Бонапарт в окружении членов Совета пятисот во время переворота 18 брюмера. Франсуа Бушо
Находясь в Египте, Бонапарт был в курсе европейских дел. Он узнал, что Франция пережила серия поражений в Война второй коалиции.[78] 24 августа 1799 года он воспользовался временным отходом британских кораблей из французских прибрежных портов и отплыл во Францию, несмотря на то, что он не получил никаких явных приказов из Парижа.[72] Армию оставили в ведении Жан-Батист Клебер.[79]
Бонапарт не знал, что Директория послала ему приказ вернуться, чтобы отразить возможные вторжения на французскую землю, но плохая связь помешала доставке этих сообщений.[78] К тому времени, когда он прибыл в Париж в октябре, положение Франции улучшилось за счет ряда побед. Республика, однако, обанкротилась, и неэффективная Директория не пользовалась популярностью у французского населения.[80] Директория обсуждала «дезертирство» Бонапарта, но была слишком слаба, чтобы наказать его.[78]
Несмотря на неудачи в Египте, Наполеон вернулся к герою. Он заключил союз с режиссером Эммануэль Жозеф Сийес, его брат Люсьен, спикер Совет пятисот Роджер Дюко, директор Жозеф Фуше, и Талейран, и они свергли Директорию государственный переворот 9 ноября 1799 г. («18 брюмера» по революционному календарю), закрытие Совета пятисот. Наполеон стал «первым консулом» на десять лет, назначив двух консулов, которые имели только совещательные голоса. Его власть была подтверждена новым «Конституция VIII года «, первоначально разработанная Сийесом, чтобы дать Наполеону второстепенную роль, но переписанная Наполеоном и принятая прямым всенародным голосованием (3 000 000 за, 1567 против). Конституция сохранила вид республики, но на самом деле установила диктатуру.[81][82]
Французское консульство
Наполеон установил политическую систему, которую историк Мартин Лайонс называется «диктатурой путем плебисцита».[83] Обеспокоенный демократическими силами, развязанными революцией, но не желая полностью игнорировать их, Наполеон на своем пути к имперской власти прибег к регулярным консультациям по выборам с французским народом.[83] Он подготовил Конституция VIII года и добился своего избрания в качестве Первый консул, поселившись в Тюильри. Конституция была утверждена в сфальсифицированный плебисцит состоялось в январе следующего года, при этом 99,94 процента голосов официально проголосовали «за».[84]
Брат Наполеона Люсьен сфальсифицировал отчеты, чтобы показать, что в плебисците приняли участие 3 миллиона человек. Реальное число было 1,5 миллиона.[83] Политические обозреватели в то время предполагали, что французская общественность, имеющая право голоса, насчитывала около 5 миллионов человек, поэтому режим искусственно удвоил коэффициент участия, чтобы продемонстрировать общественный энтузиазм по поводу консульства.[83] В первые несколько месяцев работы консульства, когда в Европе все еще бушевала война, а в стране по-прежнему царила внутренняя нестабильность, власть Наполеона оставалась очень слабой.[85]
Весной 1800 года Наполеон и его войска перешли швейцарские Альпы в Италию, стремясь удивить австрийские армии, которые повторно оккупировали полуостров, когда Наполеон еще был в Египте.[d] После трудного перехода через Альпы французская армия практически не встретила сопротивления на равнинах Северной Италии.[87] Пока одна французская армия приближалась с севера, австрийцы были заняты другой, расквартированной в Генуя, который был осажден значительной силой. Яростное сопротивление этой французской армии под Андре Массена, дал северным силам некоторое время для проведения операций с минимальным вмешательством.[88]
В Битва при Маренго была первой великой победой Наполеона на посту главы государства.
Проведя несколько дней в поисках друг друга, две армии столкнулись в Битва при Маренго 14 июня. Генерал Мелас имел численное преимущество, выставив около 30 000 австрийских солдат, в то время как Наполеон командовал 24 000 французскими войсками.[89] Битва началась благоприятно для австрийцев, поскольку их первая атака удивила французов и постепенно отбросила их назад. Мелас заявил, что выиграл битву и удалился в свой штаб около 15:00, оставив своих подчиненных отвечать за преследование французов.[90] Во время тактического отступления французские линии ни разу не прорвались. Наполеон постоянно выезжал среди войск, призывая их встать и сражаться.[91]
К вечеру полное разделение под Desaix прибыл на поле боя и переломил ход битвы. Серия артиллерийских заграждений и кавалерийских атак уничтожила австрийскую армию, которая бежала через Река Бормида вернуться к Алессандрия, оставив 14 000 жертв.[91] На следующий день австрийская армия согласилась снова покинуть Северную Италию с Конвенция Алессандрии, который предоставил им безопасный проход на дружественные земли в обмен на их крепости по всему региону.[91]
Хотя критики обвиняли Наполеона в нескольких тактических ошибках, предшествовавших битве, они также хвалили его смелость в выборе рискованной стратегии кампании, когда он решил вторгнуться на итальянский полуостров с севера, когда подавляющее большинство французских вторжений пришло с запада, вблизи или вдоль. береговая линия.[92] Как указывает Чендлер, Наполеон потратил почти год на то, чтобы вывести австрийцев из Италии в своей первой кампании. В 1800 году ему потребовался всего месяц, чтобы достичь той же цели.[92] Немецкий стратег и фельдмаршал Альфред фон Шлиффен пришел к выводу, что «Бонапарт не уничтожил своего врага, но устранил его и обезвредил» при «[достижении] цели кампании: завоевании Северной Италии».[93]
Триумф Наполеона в Маренго обеспечил его политический авторитет и повысил его популярность на родине, но не привел к немедленному миру. Брат Бонапарта, Жозеф, вел сложные переговоры в Люневиль и сообщил, что Австрия, воодушевленная британской поддержкой, не признает новую территорию, которую приобрела Франция. Поскольку переговоры становились все более напряженными, Бонапарт отдал приказ своему генералу. Моро еще раз ударить по Австрии. Моро и французы пронеслись Бавария и одержал убедительную победу на Hohenlinden в декабре 1800 года. В результате австрийцы капитулировали и подписали Люневильский договор в феврале 1801 года. Договор подтвердил и расширил ранее завоеванные Францией Кампо Формио.[94]
Временный мир в Европе
После десятилетия постоянной войны Франция и Великобритания подписали Амьенский договор в марте 1802 года, положив конец революционным войнам. Амьен призвал к выводу британских войск с недавно завоеванных колониальных территорий, а также к заверениям в ограничении экспансионистских целей Французской республики.[88] В условиях мира в Европе и восстановления экономики популярность Наполеона в консульстве взлетела до самого высокого уровня, как внутри страны, так и за рубежом.[95] В новый плебисцит Весной 1802 года французская общественность в огромных количествах вышла, чтобы одобрить конституцию, сделавшую консульство постоянным, по сути возвышая Наполеона до диктатора на всю жизнь.[95]
В то время как плебисцит двумя годами ранее привел к участию в выборах 1,5 миллиона человек, новый референдум соблазнил прийти и проголосовать 3,6 миллиона (72 процента всех имеющих право голоса).[96] В 1802 году не было тайного голосования, и мало кто хотел открыто бросить вызов режиму. Конституция получила одобрение более чем 99% голосов.[96] Его широкие полномочия были прописаны в новой конституции: Статья 1. Французский народ называет, а Сенат объявляет Наполеона-Бонапарта первым пожизненным консулом.[97] После 1802 года его стали называть Наполеоном, а не Бонапартом.[31]
1803 год Покупка Луизианы общая площадь составила 2 144 480 квадратных километров (827 987 квадратных миль), что вдвое больше, чем площадь Соединенных Штатов.
Кратковременный мир в Европе позволил Наполеону сосредоточить внимание на французских колониях за рубежом. Сен-Доминго удалось получить высокий уровень политической автономии во время революционных войн, с Туссен-Лувертюр установив себя де-факто диктатором к 1801 году. Наполеон увидел свой шанс восстановить прежде богатую колонию, когда он подписал Амьенский мирный договор. В 1780-х годах Сен-Доминг был самой богатой колонией Франции, производившей больше сахара, чем все колонии Британской Вест-Индии вместе взятые. Однако во время революции Национальное собрание проголосовало за отмену рабства в феврале 1794 года.[98] Согласно условиям Амьена, Наполеон согласился удовлетворить требования британцев, не отменяя рабство в колониях, где декрет 1794 года так и не был реализован. Однако указ 1794 года был реализован только в Сен-Доминго, Гваделупа и Guyane, и был мертвой буквой в Сенегал, Маврикий, Воссоединение и Мартиника, последний из которых был завоеван англичанами, которые поддерживали институт рабства на этом Карибском острове.[99]
В Гваделупа, закон 1794 г. отменил рабство, и Виктор Юго против противодействия рабовладельцев. Однако, когда рабство было восстановлено в 1802 году, восстание рабов Луи Делгрес.[100] Результирующий Закон от 20 мая имело явную цель восстановить рабство в Сен-Доминго, Гваделупе и Французской Гвиане и восстановить рабство во Французской империи и ее карибских колониях еще на полвека, в то время как французская трансатлантическая работорговля продолжалась еще двадцать лет.[101][102][103][104][105]
Наполеон послал экспедиция под своим зятем Генерал Леклерк восстановить контроль над Сен-Доминго. Хотя французам удалось захватить Туссена Лувертюра, экспедиция потерпела неудачу, когда высокий уровень болезней нанес урон французской армии, и Жан-Жак Дессалин одержал ряд побед, сначала над Леклерком, а когда он умер от желтой лихорадки, затем над Донасьен-Мари-Жозеф де Вимер, виконт де Рошамбо, которого Наполеон послал на помощь Леклерку с еще 20 000 человек. В мае 1803 года Наполеон признал поражение, последние 8000 французских войск покинули остров, и рабы провозгласили независимую республику, которую они назвали Гаити в 1804 году. В процессе Дессалин стал, возможно, самым успешным военачальником в борьбе против наполеоновской Франции.[106][107] Видя провал своих колониальных усилий, Наполеон в 1803 году решил продавать то Территория Луизианы в Соединенные Штаты, мгновенно увеличивая размер США вдвое. Цена продажи в Покупка Луизианы составляла менее трех центов за акр, всего 15 миллионов долларов.[2][108]
Мир с Британией оказался непростым и противоречивым.[109] Великобритания не эвакуировала Мальту, как обещала, и протестовала против действий Бонапарта. аннексия Пьемонта и его Акт о посредничестве, который установил новый Швейцарская Конфедерация. Ни одна из этих территорий не была охвачена Амьеном, но они значительно усилили напряженность.[110] Спор завершился объявлением войны Великобританией в мае 1803 года; Наполеон ответил повторной сборкой лагеря вторжения в Булони.[72]
Французская Империя
Во время консульства Наполеон столкнулся с несколькими роялистами и якобинцами. заговоры убийства, в том числе Conspiration des poignards (Сюжет кинжала) в октябре 1800 г. и Участок на улице Сен-Никез (также известный как Адская машина) два месяца спустя.[111] В январе 1804 года его полиция раскрыла против него заговор с участием Моро, который якобы спонсировался Бурбон семья, бывшие правители Франции. По совету Талейрана Наполеон приказал похитить Герцог Ангиенский, нарушая суверенитет Баден. Герцога быстро казнили после секретного военного процесса, хотя он не участвовал в заговоре.[112] Казнь Энгиена привела в ярость королевские дворы по всей Европе, став одним из политических факторов, способствовавших началу наполеоновских войн.
Чтобы расширить свою власть, Наполеон использовал эти заговоры убийства чтобы оправдать создание имперской системы, основанной на римской модели. Он считал, что восстановление Бурбона будет труднее, если преемственность его семьи будет закреплена в конституции.[113] Запуск еще еще один референдум, Наполеон был избран Император французов подсчетом более 99%.[96] Как и в случае с Life Consulate двумя годами ранее, этот референдум привел к активному участию в выборах, собрав почти 3,6 миллиона избирателей.[96]
Внимательный наблюдатель за приходом Бонапарта к абсолютной власти, Мадам де Ремюза, объясняет, что «люди, измученные беспорядками революции […] искали господства способного правителя» и что «люди искренне верили, что Бонапарт, будь то в качестве консула или императора, проявит свою власть и спасет [их] от опасностей анархии.[114]«
Тронный зал Наполеона в Фонтенбло
Коронация Наполеона, на которой Папа Пий VII исполнял обязанности, проходил в Собор Парижской Богоматери, 2 декабря 1804 года. Для церемонии были принесены две отдельные короны: золотой лавровый венок, напоминающий о Римской империи, и копия короны Карла Великого.[115] Наполеон вошел на церемонию в лавровом венке и держал его на голове на протяжении всей церемонии.[115] Для официальной коронации он символическим жестом поднял корону Карла Великого над своей головой, но никогда не возложил ее, потому что он уже был в золотом венке.[115] Вместо этого он поместил корону на Жозефины голову, событие, ознаменованное на официально санкционированной картине автора Жак-Луи Давид.[115] Наполеон тоже был коронован Король Италии, с Железная корона Ломбардии, на Миланский собор 26 мая 1805 г. Он создал восемнадцать Маршалы Империи из числа его высших генералов, чтобы обеспечить верность армии 18 мая 1804 г., когда официально началась Империя.[116]
Война Третьей коалиции
Великобритания нарушила Амьенский мир, объявив войну Франции в мае 1803 года.[117] В декабре 1804 года англо-шведское соглашение стало первым шагом к созданию Третьей коалиции. К апрелю 1805 года Британия также подписала союз с Россией.[118] За последнее время Австрия дважды терпела поражение от Франции и хотела отомстить, поэтому через несколько месяцев она присоединилась к коалиции.[119]
Перед формированием Третьей коалиции Наполеон собрал силы вторжения, Armée d’Angleterre, около шести лагерей в Булонь в Северной Франции. Он намеревался использовать эту силу вторжения, чтобы нанести удар по Англии. Они никогда не вторгались, но войска Наполеона прошли тщательную и бесценную подготовку для будущих военных операций.[120] Люди в Булони сформировали ядро того, что позже Наполеон называл La Grande Armée. Вначале эта французская армия насчитывала около 200000 человек, организованных в семь корпус, которые представляли собой крупные полевые подразделения, в составе которых было 36–40 пушки каждый и был способен к независимым действиям, пока другой корпус не мог прийти на помощь.[121]
Отдельный корпус, правильно расположенный на сильной оборонительной позиции, мог прожить без поддержки хотя бы день, что Grande Armée бесчисленные стратегические и тактические варианты в каждой кампании. Вдобавок к этим силам Наполеон создал кавалерия резерв 22000, организованный в два кирасир подразделения, четыре навесных драгуна дивизии, одна дивизия спешенных драгунов и одна легкая кавалерия, при поддержке 24 артиллерия шт.[122] К 1805 г. Grande Armée выросла до 350 000 человек,[122] которые были хорошо экипированы, хорошо обучены и возглавлялись компетентными офицерами.[123]
Наполеон знал, что французский флот не может победить Королевский флот в рукопашном бою, поэтому он планировал увести его подальше от Ла-Манша с помощью отвлекающей тактики.[124] Основная стратегическая идея заключалась в Французский флот спасаясь от британских блокад Тулон и Брест и угрожая атаковать Вест-Индию. Предполагалось, что перед лицом этой атаки англичане ослабят свою защиту Западные подходы отправив корабли в Карибское море, что позволило объединенному франко-испанскому флоту взять под контроль канал на достаточно долгое время, чтобы французские армии могли пересечь его вторгаться.[124] Однако план рассыпался после победы англичан на Битва при мысе Финистерре в июле 1805 г. французский Адмирал Вильнев затем отступил в Кадис вместо соединения с французскими военно-морскими силами в Бресте для атаки на Английский канал.[125]
К августу 1805 года Наполеон понял, что стратегическая ситуация в корне изменилась. Столкнувшись с потенциальным вторжением со стороны своих континентальных врагов, он решил нанести удар первым и обратил прицел своей армии с Ла-Манша на Рейн. Его основная цель состояла в том, чтобы уничтожить изолированные австрийские армии на юге Германии до прибытия их русских союзников. 25 сентября, после большой секретности и лихорадочного марша, 200000 французских войск начали форсировать Рейн на фронте в 260 км (160 миль).[126][127]
Австрийский командир Карл Мак собрал большую часть австрийской армии у крепости Ульм в Швабия. Наполеон развернул свои силы на юго-восток и Grande Armée выполнили сложное движение в обход австрийских позиций. В Ульм Маневр полностью удивил генерала Мака, который с опозданием понял, что его армия отрезана. После нескольких незначительных столкновений, завершившихся Битва при Ульме Мак наконец сдался, поняв, что нет возможности вырваться из французского окружения. Всего за 2000 французских потерь Наполеон сумел захватить в общей сложности 60 000 австрийских солдат быстрым маршем своей армии.[128]
В Ульмская кампания обычно считается стратегическим шедевром и оказал влияние на развитие План Шлиффена в конце 19 века.[129] Для французов эта впечатляющая победа на суше была омрачена решающей победой, которую Королевский флот одержал на Битва при Трафальгаре 21 октября. После Трафальгара Великобритания имела полное господство на море на время наполеоновских войн.[нужна цитата ]
После Ульмской кампании французским войскам удалось захватить Вена в ноябре. Падение Вены принесло французам огромную награду, поскольку они захватили 100 000 мушкетов, 500 пушек и уцелевшие мосты через реку. Дунай.[130] В этот критический момент оба Царь Александр I и Император Священной Римской империи Франциск II решили вступить в бой с Наполеоном, несмотря на возражения некоторых из своих подчиненных. Наполеон послал свою армию на север в погоне за союзниками, но затем приказал своим войскам отступить, чтобы он мог симулировать серьезную слабость.[131]
Отчаявшись заманить союзников в бой, Наполеон в дни, предшествовавшие сражению, все указывал на то, что французская армия находится в плачевном состоянии, даже оставив доминирующие Пратцен-Хайтс около деревни Аустерлиц. На Битва при Аустерлице, в Моравия 2 декабря он развернул французскую армию ниже Пратцен-Хайтс и намеренно ослабил свой правый фланг, соблазняя союзников начать здесь крупное наступление в надежде свернуть всю французскую линию. Форсированный марш из Вены Маршал Даву и его III корпус вовремя заткнул брешь, оставленную Наполеоном.[131]
Между тем интенсивное развертывание союзников против правого фланга французов ослабило их центр на Пратцен-Хайтс, который подвергся жестокой атаке со стороны IV корпус из Маршал Сульт. После того, как центр союзников был разрушен, французы пронеслись через оба вражеских фланга и отправили союзников в беспорядочный бегство, захватив при этом тысячи пленных. Битва часто рассматривается как тактический шедевр из-за почти идеального выполнения выверенного, но опасного плана — такого же уровня, как и Канны, знаменитый триумф Ганнибал около 2000 лет назад.[131]
Катастрофа союзников в Аустерлице значительно пошатнула веру императора Франциска в военные действия под руководством Великобритании. Франция и Австрия немедленно договорились о перемирии, и вскоре после этого, 26 декабря, последовал Прессбургский договор. Прессбург вывел Австрию как из войны, так и из Коалиции, укрепив ранее заключенные договоры. Кампо Формио и из Люневиль между двумя державами. Договор подтвердил потерю Австрией земель Францией в Италия и Бавария, и земли в Германии немецким союзникам Наполеона. Он также наложил компенсацию в размере 40 миллионов франков на побежденных Габсбургов и разрешил бегущим русским войскам свободный проход через враждебные территории и обратно на их родную землю. Наполеон продолжал: «Аустерлицкая битва — лучшая из всех, в которых я участвовал».[132] Фрэнк Маклинн предполагает, что Наполеон был настолько успешен в Аустерлице, что потерял связь с реальностью, и то, что раньше было французской внешней политикой, стало «личной наполеоновской политикой».[133] Винсент Кронин не соглашается, заявляя, что Наполеон не был слишком амбициозным для себя, «он воплощал амбиции тридцати миллионов французов».[134]
Ближневосточные союзы
Наполеон продолжал вынашивать грандиозный план по установлению французского присутствия на Ближнем Востоке, чтобы оказать давление на Великобританию и Россию и, возможно, заключить союз с Османской империей.[65] В феврале 1806 года османский император Селим III признал Наполеона Император. Он также выступил за союз с Францией, назвав Францию «нашим искренним и естественным союзником».[135] Это решение привело Османскую империю к проигрышной войне против России и Великобритании. Франко-персидский союз был также сформирован между Наполеоном и Персидская империя из Фатх-Али Шах Каджар. Он рухнул в 1807 году, когда Франция и Россия сами образовали неожиданный союз.[65] В конце концов, Наполеон не заключил эффективных союзов на Ближнем Востоке.[136]
Война Четвертой коалиции и Тильзит
После Аустерлица Наполеон основал Конфедерация Рейна в 1806 году. Объединение германских государств, призванных служить буферной зоной между Францией и Центральной Европой, создание Конфедерации означало конец Святая Римская Империя и значительно встревожили пруссаков.Наглая реорганизация немецкой территории французами рисковала поставить под угрозу прусское влияние в регионе, если не уничтожить его полностью. Военная лихорадка в Берлине неуклонно росла все лето 1806 года. По настоянию его двора, особенно его жены. Королева Луиза, Фридрих Вильгельм III решил бросить вызов французскому господству в Центральной Европе, начав войну.[137]
Первые военные маневры начались в сентябре 1806 года. В письме к Маршал Сульт Подробно описывая план кампании, Наполеон описал основные черты наполеоновской войны и ввел фразу Le Bataillon-Carré («квадратный батальон»).[138] в Батайон-Карре система, различные корпуса Grande Armée маршируют равномерно вместе на близком поддерживающем расстоянии.[138] Если какой-либо корпус подвергнется нападению, остальные могут быстро вступить в бой и прийти на помощь.[139]
Наполеон вторгся в Пруссию с 180-тысячным войском, быстро продвигаясь по правому берегу реки. Река Заале. Как и в предыдущих кампаниях, его основной целью было уничтожить одного противника до того, как подкрепление от другого могло нарушить баланс войны. Узнав о местонахождении прусской армии, французы повернули на запад и с подавляющей силой переправились через Заале. У близнеца битвы при Йене и Ауэрштедте, сражавшиеся 14 октября, французы убедительно разбили пруссаков и нанесли тяжелые потери. После того, как несколько главных командиров были убиты или выведены из строя, прусский король оказался неспособен эффективно командовать армией, которая начала быстро распадаться.[139]
По словам историка Ричарда Брукса, в пресловутом стремлении, которое олицетворяет «пик наполеоновской войны»,[139] французам удалось захватить 140 000 солдат, более 2 000 пушек и сотни фургонов с боеприпасами, и все это за один месяц. Историк Дэвид Чандлер писал о прусских войсках: «Никогда еще моральный дух ни одной армии не был подорван так сильно».[138] Несмотря на сокрушительное поражение, пруссаки отказывались вести переговоры с французами до тех пор, пока у русских не появится возможность вступить в бой.
После своего триумфа Наполеон ввел первые элементы континентальной системы через Берлинский указ выпущена в ноябре 1806 г. Континентальная система, запрещавшая европейским странам торговать с Великобританией, широко нарушалась на протяжении всего его правления.[140][141] В следующие несколько месяцев Наполеон двинулся против наступающих русских армий через Польшу и попал в кровавую тупиковую ситуацию. Битва при Эйлау в феврале 1807 г.[142] После периода отдыха и консолидации с обеих сторон, война возобновилась в июне с первоначальной борьбы на Heilsberg это оказалось нерешительным.[143]
14 июня Наполеон одержал сокрушительную победу над русскими на Битва при Фридланде, уничтожив большую часть русской армии в очень кровопролитной борьбе. Масштабы поражения убедили русских заключить мир с французами. 19 июня царь Александр отправил посланника с просьбой о перемирии с Наполеоном. Последний заверил посланника, что Река Висла представлял естественные границы между французским и русским влиянием в Европе. Исходя из этого, два императора начали мирные переговоры в городе Тильзит после встречи на культовом плоту на Река Неман. Самое первое, что сказал Александр Наполеону, было, вероятно, хорошо выверенным: «Я ненавижу англичан так же сильно, как и вы».[143]
Александр столкнулся с давлением брата, Герцог Константин, чтобы помириться с Наполеоном. Учитывая только что одержанную победу, французский император предложил русским относительно мягкие условия — потребовал, чтобы Россия присоединилась к континентальной системе, вывести свои войска из Валахия и Молдавия, и передать Ионические острова во Францию.[144] Напротив, Наполеон продиктовал Пруссии очень жесткие условия мира, несмотря на непрекращающиеся призывы Королева Луиза. Вычеркнув половину прусских территорий с карты, Наполеон создал новое королевство площадью 2800 квадратных километров (1100 квадратных миль), названное Вестфалия и назначил своим монархом своего младшего брата Жерома. Унизительное обращение Пруссии в Тильзите вызвало глубокий и ожесточенный антагонизм, который усиливался по мере того, как Наполеоновская эпоха прогрессировал. Более того, претензии Александра на дружбу с Наполеоном привели к тому, что последний серьезно недооценил истинные намерения своего российского коллеги, который в ближайшие несколько лет нарушит многочисленные положения договора. Несмотря на эти проблемы, Тильзитские договоры наконец дал Наполеону передышку от войны и позволил ему вернуться во Францию, которую он не видел более 300 дней.[145]
Полуостровная война и Эрфурт
Поселения в Тильзите дали Наполеону время для организации своей империи. Одной из его главных целей стало противодействие континентальной системе британским войскам. Он решил сосредоточить свое внимание на Королевство Португалия, который постоянно нарушал его торговые запреты. После поражения в Война апельсинов в 1801 году Португалия приняла двусторонняя политика. Вначале, Иоанн VI согласился закрыть свои порты для британской торговли. Ситуация резко изменилась после франко-испанского поражения при Трафальгаре; Джон осмелел и официально возобновил дипломатические и торговые отношения с Великобританией.[нужна цитата ]
Недовольный этим изменением политики португальского правительства, Наполеон договорился о секретный договор с участием Карл IV Испании и послал армию для вторжения в Португалию.[146] 17 октября 1807 г. 24 000 французских войск под командованием Генерал Жюно пересек Пиренеи с участием испанский сотрудничества и направился в сторону Португалии, чтобы обеспечить выполнение приказов Наполеона.[147] Это нападение было первым шагом в том, что в конечном итоге переросло в Полуостровную войну, шестилетнюю борьбу, которая значительно подорвала французские силы. Всю зиму 1808 года французские агенты все активнее вовлекались во внутренние дела Испании, пытаясь разжечь раздор между членами Испанская королевская семья. 16 февраля 1808 года тайные французские махинации наконец материализовались, когда Наполеон объявил, что вмешается, чтобы выступить посредником между соперничающими политическими фракциями в стране.[148]
Маршал мурат привел 120 000 солдат в Испанию. Французы прибыли в Мадрид 24 марта,[149] где через несколько недель вспыхнули дикие бунты против оккупации. Наполеон назначил своего брата, Жозеф Бонапарт, как новый король Испании летом 1808 года. Это назначение вызвало ярость у сильно религиозного и консервативного испанского населения. Сопротивление французской агрессии вскоре распространилось по всей Испании. Шокирующее поражение французов на Битва при Байлене в июле дал надежду врагам Наполеона и отчасти убедил французского императора лично вмешаться.[нужна цитата ]
Прежде чем отправиться в Иберию, Наполеон решил решить несколько давних проблем с русскими. На Конгресс Эрфурта в октябре 1808 года Наполеон надеялся удержать Россию на своей стороне во время предстоящей борьбы в Испании и во время любого потенциального конфликта с Австрией. Обе стороны достигли соглашения, Эрфуртской конвенции, которая призвала Великобританию прекратить войну против Франции и признала завоевание Россией Финляндия от Швеция и сделал это автономное Великое княжество,[150] и это подтвердило поддержку Россией Франции в возможной войне против Австрии «в меру своих возможностей».[151]
Затем Наполеон вернулся во Францию и приготовился к войне. В Grande Arméeпод личным командованием Императора быстро пересекла Эбро Ривер в ноябре 1808 года и нанес серию сокрушительных поражений испанским войскам. После очистки последних испанских сил, охраняющих столицу, Somosierra Наполеон вошел в Мадрид 4 декабря с 80 000 войсками.[152] Затем он выпустил своих солдат против Мур и британские войска. Британцы были быстро вытеснены к побережью, и они полностью покинули Испанию после последнего боя у побережья. Битва при Корунне в январе 1809 г.[нужна цитата ]
Наполеон принимает капитуляцию Мадрид, 4 декабря 1808 г.
Наполеон в конечном итоге оставил Иберию, чтобы иметь дело с австрийцами в Центральной Европе, но Полуостровная война продолжалась еще долго после его отсутствия. Он так и не вернулся в Испанию после кампании 1808 года. Через несколько месяцев после Корунны британцы отправили на полуостров еще одну армию в будущем. Герцог Веллингтон. Затем война зашла в сложный и асимметричный стратегический тупик, где все стороны пытались одержать верх. Изюминкой конфликта стала жестокая партизанская война это охватило большую часть испанской сельской местности. Обе стороны совершили самые ужасные злодеяния наполеоновских войн на этом этапе конфликта.[153]
Ожесточенные партизанские бои в Испании, в значительной степени отсутствовавшие во французских кампаниях в Центральной Европе, серьезно нарушили французские линии снабжения и коммуникации. Хотя во время войны на полуострове Франция содержала в Иберии около 300 000 солдат, подавляющее большинство было привязано к гарнизонной службе и к разведывательным операциям.[153] Французы так и не смогли эффективно сконцентрировать все свои силы, затягивая войну до тех пор, пока события в других частях Европы, наконец, не переломили ситуацию в пользу союзников. После вторжения в Россию в 1812 году количество французских войск в Испании значительно сократилось, так как Наполеон нуждался в подкреплении, чтобы сохранить свое стратегическое положение в Европе. К 1814 году, после множества сражений и осад на всей территории Иберии, союзникам удалось вытеснить французов с полуострова.[нужна цитата ]
Влияние наполеоновского вторжения в Испанию и изгнание испанской монархии Бурбонов в пользу его брата Джозефа оказало огромное влияние на Испанская империя. В Испанская Америка многие местные элиты сформировали хунты и создали механизмы, чтобы править во имя Фердинанд VII Испании, которого они считали законным испанским монархом. Вспышка Испано-американские войны за независимость на большей части империи был результатом дестабилизирующих действий Наполеона в Испании и привел к росту сильный мужчина после этих войн.[154]
Война Пятой коалиции и Мари-Луизы
Проведя четыре года в стороне, Австрия стремилась к новой войне с Францией, чтобы отомстить за свои недавние поражения. Австрия не могла рассчитывать на поддержку России, потому что последняя находилась в состоянии войны с Британия, Швеция, а Османская империя в 1809 г. Фредерик Уильям Пруссии первоначально обещал помочь австрийцам, но отступил до начала конфликта.[155] В отчете министра финансов Австрии говорилось, что к середине 1809 г. в казне закончатся деньги, если большая армия, сформированная австрийцами со времен Третьей коалиции, останется мобилизованной.[155] Несмотря на то что Эрцгерцог Карл предупредил, что австрийцы не готовы к новому столкновению с Наполеоном, позиция, которая привела его к так называемой «партии мира», он также не хотел видеть демобилизацию армии.[155] 8 февраля 1809 года сторонники войны наконец добились успеха, когда имперское правительство тайно приняло решение о новой конфронтации с французами.[нужна цитата ]
Рано утром 10 апреля передовые части австрийской армии переправились через Inn River и вторгся в Баварию. Ранняя австрийская атака удивила французов; Сам Наполеон был еще в Париже, когда услышал о вторжении. Он прибыл в Донаувёрт 17-го, чтобы найти Grande Armée в опасной позиции, с двумя крыльями, разделенными на 120 км (75 миль) и соединенными тонким кордоном баварских войск. Карл прижал левое крыло французской армии и бросил своих людей в сторону III корпуса маршала Даву. В ответ Наполеон придумал план отрезать австрийцам знаменитый Ландсхут Маневр.[156] Он перестроил ось своей армии и повел своих солдат к городу Экмюль. В результате французы одержали убедительную победу. Битва при Экмюле, вынуждая Чарльза отвести свои силы через Дунай и в Богемия. 13 мая Вена пала во второй раз за четыре года, хотя война продолжалась, так как большая часть австрийской армии пережила первоначальные сражения в Южной Германии.
К 17 мая основная австрийская армия под командованием Карла прибыла на Марчфельд. Карл держал большую часть своих войск в нескольких километрах от берега реки в надежде сосредоточить их в том месте, где Наполеон решил переправиться. 21 мая французы предприняли первую крупную попытку форсировать Дунай, в результате чего Битва при Асперн-Эсслинге. Австрийцы пользовались комфортным численным превосходством над французами на протяжении всей битвы. В первый день Карл разместил 110 000 солдат против 31 000 под командованием Наполеона.[157] Ко второму дню подкрепление увеличило французскую численность до 70 000 человек.[158]
Битва характеризовалась ожесточенной борьбой за две деревни Асперн и Эсслинг, центральные пункты французского плацдарма. К концу боя французы потеряли Асперн, но все еще контролировали Эсслинг. Продолжительный австрийский артиллерийский обстрел в конце концов убедил Наполеона отвести свои силы обратно на остров Лобау. Обе стороны нанесли друг другу около 23 000 жертв.[159] Это было первое поражение, которое Наполеон потерпел в крупном боевом сражении, и вызвало волнение во многих частях Европы, поскольку доказало, что его можно победить на поле боя.[160]
После неудачи при Асперн-Эсслинге Наполеон потратил больше шести недель на планирование и подготовку на случай непредвиденных обстоятельств, прежде чем он предпринял еще одну попытку форсировать Дунай.[161] С 30 июня до первых дней июля французы повторно форсировали Дунай с более чем 180 000 войсками, марширующими через Марчфельд к австрийцам.[161] Карл принял французов со 150 тысячами своих людей.[162] В последующем Битва при Ваграме, которое также длилось два дня, Наполеон командовал своими войсками в крупнейшей битве в его карьере до того момента. Наполеон завершил битву сосредоточенным ударом по центру, который пробил брешь в австрийской армии и заставил Карла отступить. Потери Австрии были очень тяжелыми, достигнув более 40 000 человек.[163] Французы были слишком измотаны, чтобы немедленно преследовать австрийцев, но Наполеон в конце концов догнал Чарльза в Знайм и последний подписал перемирие 12 июля.
в Королевство Голландия, англичане запустили Кампания Walcheren чтобы открыть второй фронт в войне и ослабить давление на австрийцев. Британская армия высадилась только в Walcheren 30 июля, к этому моменту австрийцы уже потерпели поражение. Кампания Walcheren характеризовалась небольшими боевыми действиями, но большими потерями благодаря широко известному выражению «Валхеренская лихорадка Более 4000 британских солдат были потеряны в неудачной кампании, а остальные отступили в декабре 1809 года.[164] Главным стратегическим результатом кампании стало отложенное политическое урегулирование между французами и австрийцами. Император Франциск хотел подождать и посмотреть, как англичане выступят в своем театре, прежде чем вступить в переговоры с Наполеоном. Как только стало очевидно, что англичане никуда не денутся, австрийцы согласились на мирные переговоры.[нужна цитата ]
Результирующий Договор Шенбрунн октябрь 1809 года был самым жестоким, что Франция навязала Австрии за последнее время. Меттерних и эрцгерцог Карл сохранил Габсбургская империя в качестве своей основной цели, и в этом они преуспели, заставив Наполеона искать более скромные цели в обмен на обещания дружбы между двумя державами.[165] Тем не менее, хотя большая часть наследственных земель оставалась частью Габсбургского царства, Франция получила Каринтия, Карниола, а Адриатика порты, а Галиция был отдан Поляки и Зальцбург площадь Тироль ушел к Баварцы.[165] В результате этих территориальных изменений Австрия потеряла более трех миллионов подданных, примерно пятую часть своего населения.[166] Хотя боевые действия в Иберии продолжались, Война Пятой коалиции стала последним крупным конфликтом на европейском континенте в течение следующих трех лет.[нужна цитата ]
После войны Наполеон сосредоточился на внутренних делах. Императрица Жозефина еще не родил ребенка от Наполеона, который после своей смерти стал беспокоиться о будущем своей империи. Отчаявшись найти законного наследника, Наполеон развелся с Жозефиной 10 января 1810 года и начал искать новую жену. В надежде укрепить недавний союз с Австрией через семейные связи, Наполеон женился на Мари Луиза, герцогиня Пармская, дочь Франциск II, которому на тот момент было 18 лет. 20 марта 1811 года Мария Луиза родила мальчика, которого Наполеон сделал наследником и пожаловал титул Король Рима. Его сын на самом деле никогда не правил империей, но, учитывая его краткое титульное правление и последующее наименование двоюродного брата Луи-Наполеона Наполеоном III, историки часто называют его Наполеон II.[167]
Нашествие России
В 1808 году Наполеон и царь Александр встретились в Конгресс Эрфурта сохранить русско-французский союз. После их первой встречи в Тильзите в 1807 году у лидеров сложились дружеские личные отношения.[168] К 1811 году, однако, напряжение усилилось, и Александр оказался под давлением со стороны Русское дворянство разорвать союз.[нужна цитата ] Серьезным напряжением в отношениях между двумя странами стали регулярные нарушения русскими континентальной системы, что привело к тому, что Наполеон пригрозил Александру серьезными последствиями, если он заключит союз с Британией.[169]
К 1812 году советники Александра предположили возможность вторжения во Французскую империю и повторного захвата Польши. Получив отчеты разведки о военных приготовлениях России, Наполеон расширил свои полномочия. Grande Armée более чем 450 000 человек.[170] Он проигнорировал неоднократные советы против вторжения в глубь России и готовился к наступательной кампании; 24 июня 1812 г. началось вторжение.[171]
В попытке заручиться большей поддержкой польских националистов и патриотов Наполеон назвал войну Вторая польская война— Первая польская война был Бар Конфедерация восстание польских дворян против России в 1768 году. Польские патриоты хотели присоединения русской части Польши к Варшавскому герцогству и создания независимой Польши. Это было отклонено Наполеоном, заявившим, что он обещал своему союзнику Австрию, что этого не произойдет. Наполеон отказался отпускать на волю русский крепостные из-за опасений это могло спровоцировать реакцию в тылу его армии. Позже крепостные зверствовали против французских солдат во время отступления Франции.[172]
Русские избежали цели Наполеона решающего сражения и вместо этого отступили вглубь России. Была предпринята краткая попытка сопротивления Смоленск в августе; русские потерпели поражение в серии сражений, и Наполеон возобновил свое наступление. Русские снова избежали сражения, хотя в некоторых случаях это было достигнуто только потому, что Наполеон необычно не решался атаковать, когда представилась возможность. Благодаря выжженная земля Тактика французов становилась все труднее добывать пищу для себя и своих лошадей.[173]
В конце концов, 7 сентября русские предложили бой под Москвой: Бородинская битва в результате около 44 000 русских и 35 000 французов были убиты, ранены или взяты в плен, и, возможно, это был самый кровопролитный день битвы в истории на тот момент.[174] Хотя французы победили, русская армия согласилась и выдержала крупное сражение, которое, как надеялся Наполеон, будет решающим. Сам Наполеон писал: «Самым ужасным из всех моих сражений было сражение перед Москвой. Французы показали себя достойными победы, но русские показали себя достойными непобедимости».[175]
Русская армия отступила и отступила за Москву. Наполеон вошел в город, предполагая, что его падение положит конец войне, а Александр заключит мир. Однако по приказу губернатора города Федор Ростопчин Вместо капитуляции Москва была сожжена. Через пять недель Наполеон и его армия ушли. В начале ноября Наполеон забеспокоился о потере контроля над Францией после Переворот Малета 1812 года. Его армия шла по снегу по колено, и только в ночь с 8 на 9 ноября почти 10 000 человек и лошадей замерзли насмерть. После Битва при Березине Наполеону удалось бежать, но ему пришлось оставить большую часть оставшейся артиллерии и обоза. 5 декабря, незадолго до прибытия в Вильнюс, Наполеон покинул армию на санях.[176]
Французы пострадали в ходе разрушительного отступления, в том числе из-за жестокости Русская зима. Армия вначале насчитывала более 400 000 солдат на передовой, из них менее 40 000 пересекли границу. Р. Березина в ноябре 1812 г.[177] Русские потеряли в боях 150 000 солдат и сотни тысяч мирных жителей.[178]
Война Шестой коалиции
Зимой 1812-1813 гг. В боях было затишье, когда и русские, и французы восстановили свои силы; Наполеон смог выставить 350 000 солдат.[179] Воодушевленная поражением Франции в России, Пруссия присоединилась к Австрии, Швеции, России, Великобритании, Испании и Португалии в новой коалиции. Наполеон принял командование в Германии и нанес коалиции ряд поражений, кульминацией которых стало Битва за Дрезден в августе 1813 г.[180]
Несмотря на эти успехи, число противников Наполеона продолжало расти, и французская армия была скована силой, вдвое превышающей ее численность, и проиграла Битва при лейпциге. Это была самая крупная битва наполеоновских войн, в которой в общей сложности погибло более 90 000 человек.[181]
Союзники предложили условия мира в Предложения Франкфурта в ноябре 1813 г. Наполеон останется императором Франции, но он будет ограничен «естественными границами». Это означало, что Франция могла сохранить контроль над Бельгией, Савойей и Рейнской областью (западный берег реки Рейн), отказавшись от контроля над всем остальным, включая всю Испанию и Нидерланды, а также большую часть Италии и Германии. Меттерних сказал Наполеону, что это были лучшие условия, которые могли предложить союзники; после дальнейших побед условия будут все жестче и жестче. Мотивация Меттерниха заключалась в том, чтобы сохранить Францию как баланс против российских угроз, в то же время положив конец крайне дестабилизирующей серии войн.[182]
Наполеон, надеясь выиграть войну, слишком долго откладывал и упустил эту возможность; к декабрю союзники отозвали это предложение. Когда в 1814 году он стоял спиной к стене, он попытался возобновить мирные переговоры на основе принятия Франкфуртских предложений. Теперь у союзников были новые, более жесткие условия, которые включали отступление Франции к границам 1791 года, что означало потерю Бельгии. Наполеон остался императором, однако он отверг этот термин. Британцы хотели навсегда устранить Наполеона, и они победили, но Наполеон категорически отказался.[182][183]
Наполеон после отречения в Фонтенбло 4 апреля 1814 г. Поль Деларош
Наполеон отступил во Францию, его армия сократилась до 70 000 солдат и небольшой кавалерии; он столкнулся с более чем в три раза большим числом войск союзников.[184] Французы были окружены: британские армии давили с юга, а другие силы коалиции были готовы атаковать со стороны германских государств. Наполеон одержал серию побед в Шесть дней кампании, хотя они не были достаточно значительными, чтобы переломить ситуацию. Лидеры Парижа сдались Коалиции в марте 1814 года.[185] 1 апреля Александр обратился к Sénat conservateur. Давно послушный Наполеону, под натиском Талейрана оно повернулось против него. Александр сказал Sénat, что союзники сражались против Наполеона, а не против Франции, и они были готовы предложить почетные условия мира, если Наполеон будет отстранен от власти. На следующий день Сенат прошел Acte de déchéance de l’Empereur («Закон о кончине императора»), в котором Наполеон объявлен свергнутым.
Наполеон продвинулся так далеко, как Фонтенбло когда он узнал, что Пэрис потеряна. Когда Наполеон предложил марш армии на столицу, его старшие офицеры и маршалы взбунтовались.[186] 4 апреля под руководством Ney, старшие офицеры противостояли Наполеону. Когда Наполеон заявил, что армия последует за ним, Ней ответила, что армия будет следовать за своими генералами. В то время как рядовые солдаты и офицеры полков хотели сражаться, старшие командиры не желали продолжать. Без старших офицеров или маршалов предполагаемое вторжение в Париж было бы невозможным. Поклонившись неизбежному, 4 апреля Наполеон отрекся от престола в пользу своего сына с Мари Луизой в качестве регента. Однако союзники отказались принять это по настоянию Александра, который опасался, что Наполеон найдет предлог, чтобы вернуть себе трон.[187] Только два дня спустя Наполеон был вынужден объявить о своем безоговорочном отречении.
Ссылка на Эльбу
Наполеон покидает Эльбу 26 февраля 1815 г. Джозеф Бом (1836)
Союзные державы заявили, что император Наполеон был единственным препятствием на пути восстановления мира в Европе, император Наполеон, верный своей присяге, заявляет, что он отказывается для себя и своих наследников от престолов Франции и Италии, и что существует никакой личной жертвы, даже той, на которую он не готов пойти в интересах Франции.
Совершено во дворце Фонтенбло 11 апреля 1814 года.— Акт отречения Наполеона[188]
в Договор Фонтенбло, союзники сослали Наполеона в Эльба, остров с 12 000 жителей в Средиземном море, в 20 км (12 миль) от Тосканский берег. Они дали ему суверенитет над островом и позволил ему сохранить титул Император. Наполеон попытался покончить жизнь самоубийством с таблеткой, которую он нес после того, как был почти захвачен русскими во время отступления из Москвы. Однако его сила с возрастом ослабла, и он выжил, чтобы быть изгнанным, в то время как его жена и сын нашли убежище в Австрии.[189]
Его доставили на остров HMS Неустрашимый капитаном Томас Ашер, и он прибыл в Портоферрайо 30 мая 1814 года. В первые несколько месяцев на Эльбе он создал небольшой флот и армию, разработал железные рудники, руководил строительством новых дорог, издал указы о современных методах ведения сельского хозяйства и пересмотрел правовую и образовательную систему острова.[190][191]
Через несколько месяцев после изгнания Наполеон узнал, что его бывшая жена Жозефина умерла во Франции. Он был потрясен этой новостью, заперся в своей комнате и отказывался уходить в течение двух дней.[192]
Сто дней
Разлученный со своей женой и сыном, которые вернулись в Австрию, лишенные пособия, гарантированного ему Фонтенблоским договором, и зная о слухах, он собирался быть сослан на отдаленный остров в Атлантическом океане.[193] Наполеон сбежал с Эльбы в бриг Непостоянный 26 февраля 1815 года с 700 мужчинами.[193] Два дня спустя он приземлился на материковой части Франции в Гольф-Жуан и двинулись на север.[193]
5-й полк был отправлен на перехват и установил контакт. чуть южнее из Гренобль 7 марта 1815 г. Наполеон в одиночку подошел к полку, спешился со своей лошади и, когда он был на расстоянии выстрела, крикнул солдатам: «Вот я. Убейте своего императора, если хотите».[194] Солдаты быстро ответили: «Vive L’Empereur!» Ней, которая хвасталась восстановившемуся королю Бурбонов, Людовик XVIII, что он привезет Наполеона в Париж в железной клетке, нежно поцеловал своего бывшего императора и забыл его присягу на верность монарху Бурбонов. Затем они двое вместе с растущей армией двинулись к Парижу. Непопулярный Людовик XVIII бежал в Бельгию, осознав, что у него мало политической поддержки. 13 марта власть на Венский конгресс объявил Наполеона вне закона. Четыре дня спустя Великобритания, Россия, Австрия и Пруссия пообещали выставить на поле боя по 150 000 человек, чтобы положить конец его правлению.[195]
Наполеон прибыл в Париж 20 марта и правил в течение периода, который теперь называется Сто дней. К началу июня имеющиеся у него вооруженные силы достигли 200 000 человек, и он решил перейти в наступление, чтобы попытаться вбить клин между наступающими британскими и прусскими армиями. В Французская армия Севера пересек границу в Соединенное Королевство Нидерландов, в современной Бельгии.[196]
Силы Наполеона сражались с двумя армиями Коалиции под командованием англичан. Герцог Веллингтон и прусский Принц Блюхер, на Битва при Ватерлоо 18 июня 1815 г. Армия Веллингтона выдержала неоднократные атаки французов и отбросила их с поля боя, в то время как пруссаки прибыли с силой и прорвали правый фланг Наполеона.
Наполеон вернулся в Париж и обнаружил, что и законодательная власть, и народ повернулись против него. Понимая, что его положение несостоятельно, он отрекся от престола 22 июня в пользу своего сына. Через три дня он покинул Париж и поселился в бывшем дворце Жозефины в Мальмезон (на западном берегу р. Сена примерно в 17 км (11 миль) к западу от Парижа). Даже когда Наполеон отправился в Париж, силы Коалиции пронеслись по Франции (прибыв в окрестности Парижа 29 июня) с заявленным намерением вернуть Людовика XVIII на французский трон.
Когда Наполеон услышал, что прусские войска получили приказ схватить его живым или мертвым, он бежал в Рошфор, рассматривая возможность побега в Соединенные Штаты. Британские корабли блокировали каждый порт. Наполеон сдался Капитан Фредерик Мейтленд на HMSБеллерофонт 15 июля 1815 г.[197]
Изгнание на остров Святой Елены
Наполеон на острове Святой Елены, акварель Франца Йозефа Зандманна, c. 1820
Дом Лонгвуда, остров Святой Елены, место плена Наполеона
Британцы держали Наполеона на острове Святой Елены в Атлантическом океане, в 1870 км (1162 миль) от западного побережья Африки. Они также приняли меры предосторожности, отправив гарнизон солдат в безлюдные районы. Остров Вознесения, который лежал между островом Святой Елены и Европой.[198]
Наполеон был перемещен в Дом Лонгвуда на острове Святой Елены в декабре 1815 года; он пришел в упадок, и место было влажным, продуваемым ветрами и нездоровым.[199][200] Времена опубликовал статьи, намекающие, что британское правительство пытается ускорить его смерть. Наполеон часто жаловался на условия жизни в письмах губернатору и его опекуну, Хадсон Лоу,[201] а его служители жаловались на «простуду, катары, влажные полы и плохое питание ».[202] Современные ученые предположили, что его более поздняя болезнь могла возникнуть в результате отравления мышьяком, вызванного арсенит меди на обоях в Longwood House.[203]
Имея небольшую группу последователей, Наполеон продиктовал свои мемуары и ворчал об условиях. Лоу сократил расходы Наполеона, постановил, что подарки не допускаются, если они упоминают его имперский статус, и заставил своих сторонников подписать гарантию, что они останутся с пленником на неопределенный срок.[204]
В изгнании Наполеон написал книгу о Юлий Цезарь, один из его великих героев.[205] Он также изучал английский язык под руководством Граф Эммануэль де Лас Кейс с главной целью — читать английские газеты и книги, так как доступ к французским газетам и книгам на острове Святой Елены был строго ограничен.[206]
Ходили слухи о заговорах и даже о его побеге, но на самом деле серьезных попыток предпринято не было.[207] Для английского поэта Лорд байрон Наполеон был воплощением романтического героя, преследуемого, одинокого и несовершенного гения.[208]
Смерть
Посмертная маска Наполеона
Личный врач Наполеона, Барри О’Мира, предупредил Лондон, что его ухудшающееся состояние здоровья в основном вызвано суровым обращением. Наполеон месяцами запирался в своем сыром и жалком жилище Лонгвуд.[209]
В феврале 1821 года здоровье Наполеона начало стремительно ухудшаться, и он примирился с католической церковью. Он умер 5 мая 1821 года после исповеди, Чрезвычайное Соборование и Viaticum в присутствии отца Анжа Виньяли. Его последними словами были: Франция, l’armée, tête d’armée, Joséphine («Франция, армия, глава армии Жозефина»).[210][211]
Оригинал Наполеона посмертная маска был создан около 6 мая, хотя неясно, какой врач его создал.[e][213] В своем завещании он просил, чтобы его похоронили на берегу Сены, но британский губернатор сказал, что его следует похоронить на острове Святой Елены, в долине Ив.[210]
В 1840 г. Луи Филипп I получил разрешение от англичан вернуть останки Наполеона во Францию. 15 декабря 1840 г. государственные похороны был проведен. Катафалк проследовал от Триумфальной арки вниз по Елисейские поля, через Place de la Concorde к Эспланада инвалидов а затем к куполу в часовне Святого Жерома, где он оставался до гробницы, спроектированной Луи Висконти было выполнено.
В 1861 году останки Наполеона были захоронены в порфировый камень саркофаг в склепе под куполом на Les Invalides.[214]
Причина смерти
Причина его смерти обсуждается. Врач Наполеона, Франсуа Карло Антоммарки, провел вскрытие, которое установило причину смерти рак желудка. Антоммарчи не подписал официальный отчет.[215] Отец Наполеона умер от рака желудка, хотя на момент вскрытия об этом не было известно.[216] Антоммарчи обнаружил следы язвы желудка; это было наиболее удобное объяснение для англичан, которые хотели избежать критики за свою заботу о Наполеоне.[210]
В 1955 году были опубликованы дневники камердинера Наполеона Луи Маршана. Его описание Наполеона за несколько месяцев до его смерти привело к Стен Форшувуд в статье 1961 г. Природа выдвигать другие причины его смерти, в том числе умышленные отравление мышьяком.[217] В то время мышьяк использовался как яд, потому что его нельзя было обнаружить при длительном применении. Кроме того, в книге 1978 г. Бен Вейдер Форшувуд отметил, что тело Наполеона было обнаружено, что оно хорошо сохранилось при перемещении в 1840 году. Мышьяк является сильным консервантом, и, следовательно, это подтверждает гипотезу отравления. Форшувуд и Вейдер заметили, что Наполеон пытался утолить ненормальную жажду, выпивая большое количество фруктовый сироп содержащие цианистые соединения в миндале, используемом для ароматизации.[217]
Они утверждали, что тартрат калия использованные в его лечении препятствовали его желудку от изгнания этих соединений, и что его жажда была симптомом яда. Их гипотеза заключалась в том, что каломель передозировка Наполеона стала передозировкой, которая убила его и оставила обширные ткань повреждение сзади.[217] Согласно статье 2007 года, тип мышьяка, обнаруженный в стержнях волос Наполеона, был минеральным, самым токсичным, и, по словам токсиколога Патрика Кинца, это подтверждает вывод о том, что он был убит.[218]
Существовали современные исследования, которые подтвердили первоначальные результаты вскрытия.[218] В исследовании 2008 года ученые проанализировали образцы волос Наполеона на протяжении всей его жизни, а также образцы его семьи и других современников. Во всех образцах был высокий уровень мышьяка, примерно в 100 раз превышающий текущий средний уровень. По мнению этих исследователей, тело Наполеона было сильно загрязнено мышьяком еще в детстве, и высокая концентрация мышьяка в его волосах не была вызвана преднамеренным отравлением; люди постоянно подвергались воздействию мышьяка из клеев и красителей на протяжении всей своей жизни.[f] Исследования, опубликованные в 2007 и 2008 годах, отклонили доказательства отравления мышьяком и подтвердили доказательства того, что язвенная болезнь и рак желудка как причина смерти.[220]
Религия
Наполеон крестился в Аяччо 21 июля 1771 года. Он был воспитан как католик, но так и не развил большой веры.[221] Повзрослев, Наполеон был деист, веря в отсутствующего и далекого Бога. Однако он остро осознавал силу организованной религии в социальных и политических делах и уделял много внимания тому, чтобы подчинить ее своим целям. Он отметил влияние ритуалов католицизма и великолепия.[221]
Наполеон имел гражданский брак с Жозефиной Богарне без религиозных церемоний. Наполеон был коронован императором 2 декабря 1804 г. Собор Парижской Богоматери на церемонии под председательством Папа Пий VII. Накануне церемонии коронации и по настоянию Папы Пия VII была проведена частная религиозная свадебная церемония Наполеона и Жозефины. Кардинал Феш исполнил свадьбу.[222] Этот брак был аннулирован трибуналами под контролем Наполеона в январе 1810 года. 1 апреля 1810 года Наполеон женился на австрийской принцессе. Мари Луиза в католической церемонии. Наполеон был отлучен католической церковью, но позже примирился с церковью перед своей смертью в 1821 году.[223] Находясь в изгнании на острове Святой Елены, он сказал: «Я знаю людей; и говорю вам, что Иисус Христос не человек».[224][225][226]
Конкордат
Лидеры католической церкви приносят гражданскую присягу, требуемую Конкордат
Стремясь к национальному примирению между революционерами и католиками, 15 июля 1801 года между Наполеоном и католиками был подписан Конкордат 1801 года. Папа Пий VII. Это укрепило Римско-католическую церковь как церковь большинства Франции и вернуло большую часть ее гражданского статуса. Враждебность набожных католиков к государству теперь в значительной степени разрешилась. Конкордат не восстановил огромные церковные земли и пожертвования, которые были захвачены во время революции и проданы. В рамках Конкордата Наполеон представил другой свод законов, названный Органические статьи.[227][228]
Хотя Конкордат восстановил большую мощность папство, баланс церковно-государственных отношений твердо наклонился в пользу Наполеона. Он выбирал епископов и контролировал церковные финансы. И Наполеон, и Папа сочли Конкордат полезным. Подобные договоренности были достигнуты с церковью на территориях, контролируемых Наполеоном, особенно в Италии и Германии.[229] Теперь Наполеон мог завоевать расположение католиков, одновременно контролируя Рим в политическом смысле. Наполеон сказал в апреле 1801 года: «Умелые завоеватели не запутались со священниками. Они могут как сдерживать их, так и использовать». Французским детям был издан катехизис, который учил их любить и уважать Наполеона.[230]
Арест Папы Пия VII
В 1809 году по приказу Наполеона Папа Пий VII был помещен под арест в Италии, а в 1812 году пленник Понтифик был переведен во Францию, где содержался в Дворец Фонтенбло.[231] Поскольку арест был произведен тайным образом, некоторые источники[232][231] описать это как похищение. В январе 1813 года Наполеон лично заставил Папу подписать унизительный «Конкордат Фонтенбло».[233] которое позже было отвергнуто Понтификом.[234] Папа не был освобожден до 1814 года, когда Коалиция вторглась во Францию.
Религиозная эмансипация
Наполеон эмансипированные евреи, а также протестантов в католических странах и католиков в протестантских странах из-за законов, которые ограничивали их гетто, и он расширил их права на собственность, поклонение и карьеру. Несмотря на антисемитскую реакцию на политику Наполеона со стороны иностранных правительств и внутри Франции, он считал, что эмансипация принесет пользу Франции, поскольку привлечет евреев в страну с учетом ограничений, с которыми они сталкиваются в других местах.[235]
В 1806 году Наполеон собрал собрание еврейских знати, чтобы обсудить 12 вопросов, широко касающихся отношений между евреями и христианами, а также других вопросов, касающихся способности евреев интегрироваться во французское общество. Позже, после того как император дал удовлетворительный ответ на вопросы, «великий синедрион «был собран вместе, чтобы превратить ответы в решения, которые лягут в основу будущего статуса евреев во Франции и остальной части империи, которую строил Наполеон.[236]
Он заявил: «Я никогда не приму никаких предложений, которые заставят еврейский народ покинуть Францию, потому что для меня евреи такие же, как и любой другой гражданин в нашей стране. Чтобы изгнать их из страны, нужна слабость, но для этого требуется сила их ассимилировать «.[237] Он считался настолько благосклонным к евреям, что Русская Православная Церковь официально осудил его как «Антихрист и Враг Бога «.[238]
Через год после последнего заседания синедриона, 17 марта 1808 года, Наполеон поместил евреев на испытательный срок. Тогда же были приняты несколько новых законов, ограничивающих гражданство евреев, которые были предложены 17 лет назад. Однако, несмотря на давление со стороны лидеров ряда христианских общин, чтобы те воздержались от предоставления евреям эмансипации, в течение одного года после введения новых ограничений они были снова сняты в ответ на призыв евреев со всей Франции.[236]
Масонство
Доподлинно неизвестно, был ли Наполеон посвящен в Масонство. Как Император, он назначил своих братьев в масонские офисы под своей юрисдикцией: Людовику было присвоено звание Заместитель Великого Магистра в 1805 г .; Иерониму присвоено звание Великого Магистра Великого Востока Вестфалии; Джозеф был назначен Великим Магистром Гранд Ориент де Франс; и, наконец, Люсьен был членом Великого Востока Франции.[239]
Личность
Историки подчеркивают силу амбиций, которые привели Наполеона из малоизвестной деревни к командованию большей частью Европы.[240] Углубленные академические исследования о его ранняя жизнь пришли к выводу, что до 2 лет у него был «нежный расположение «.[22] Его старший брат, Джозеф, часто привлекали внимание матери, что делало Наполеона более напористым и целеустремленным. В первые годы учебы одноклассники жестоко издевались над ним за его корсиканскую идентичность и контроль над французским языком. Чтобы противостоять стрессу, он стал властным и со временем развил комплекс неполноценности.[22]
Джордж Ф. Э. Руде подчеркивает свое «редкое сочетание воли, интеллекта и физической силы».[241] В ситуациях один на один он обычно оказывал гипнотическое воздействие на людей, казалось бы, подчиняя сильнейших лидеров своей воле.[242] Он разбирался в военных технологиях, но не был новатором в этом отношении.[243] Он был новатором в использовании финансовых, бюрократических и дипломатических ресурсов Франции. Он мог быстро диктовать ряд сложных команд своим подчиненным, не забывая о том, где должны находиться основные подразделения в каждый момент будущего, и, подобно шахматному мастеру, «видя» лучшие ходы впереди.[244]
Наполеон придерживался строгих и эффективных рабочих привычек, отдавая приоритет тому, что нужно было сделать. Он жульничал в карты, но возмещал проигрыши; он должен был побеждать во всем, что пытался.[245] Он держал на работе реле персонала и секретарей. В отличие от многих генералов, Наполеон не изучал историю, чтобы спросить, что Ганнибал или Александр или кто-либо другой сделал в подобной ситуации. Критики говорили, что он выигрывал много сражений просто благодаря удаче; Наполеон ответил: «Дайте мне счастливых генералов», аргументируя это тем, что «удача» приходит к лидерам, которые признают возможность и используют ее.[246] Дуайер утверждает, что победы Наполеона при Аустерлице и Йене в 1805–06 годах усилили его чувство собственного величия, сделав его еще более уверенным в своей судьбе и непобедимости.[247] «Я принадлежу к расе, основавшей империи», — однажды хвастался он, считая себя наследником древних римлян.[248]
С точки зрения влияния на события повлияла не только личность Наполеона. Он реорганизовал саму Францию, чтобы снабжать людей и деньги, необходимые для войн.[249] Он вдохновил своих людей -герцог Веллингтон сказал, что его присутствие на поле боя стоило 40 000 солдат, поскольку он внушал доверие рядовым фельдмаршалам.[250] Он также нервировал врага. На Битва при Ауэрштадте в 1806 г. войска короля Фридрих Вильгельм III Прусский численно превосходили французов на 63 000 против 27 000; однако, когда ему по ошибке сказали, что командует Наполеон, он приказал поспешно отступить, которое превратилось в бегство.[251] Сила его личности нейтрализовала материальные трудности, поскольку его солдаты сражались с уверенностью, что с Наполеоном они обязательно победят.[252]
Образ
Наполеон стал всемирной культурной иконой, символизирующей военный гений и политическую мощь. Мартин ван Кревельд описал его как «самого компетентного человека, который когда-либо жил».[253] После его смерти многие города, улицы, корабли и даже герои мультфильмов были названы его именем. Он был изображен в сотнях фильмов и обсужден в сотнях тысяч книг и статей.[254][255][256]
При личной встрече многие из его современников были удивлены его внешне ничем не примечательной внешностью в отличие от его значительных поступков и репутации, особенно в юности, когда его постоянно описывали как маленького и худощавого. Джозеф Фарингтон, который лично наблюдал за Наполеоном в 1802 году, заметил, что «Сэмюэл Роджерс стоял немного в стороне от меня и … казалось, был разочарован выражением лица [лица] [Наполеона] и сказал, что это было лицо маленького итальянца. » Фарингтон сказал, что глаза Наполеона были «светлее и более серые, чем я ожидал по его цвету лица», что «его лицо ниже среднего», и что «его общий вид был мягче, чем я думал раньше».[257]
Личный друг Наполеона сказал, что когда он впервые встретил его в Бриен-ле-Шато в молодости Наполеон отличался только «темным цветом лица, проницательным и пристальным взглядом, манерой разговора»; он также сказал, что Наполеон лично был серьезным и мрачным человеком: «его разговор имел вид дурного настроения, и он определенно был не очень любезен».[258] Иоганн Людвиг Вюрстембергер, сопровождавший Наполеона из лагеря Форнио в 1797 году и во время швейцарской кампании 1798 года, отмечал, что «Бонапарт был довольно худощавым и исхудавшим; его лицо тоже было очень худым, с темным лицом … его черный цвет. непорошковые волосы равномерно ниспадали на оба плеча «, но это, несмотря на его хрупкую и неопрятную внешность,» его взгляд и выражение лица были серьезными и сильными «.[259]
Денис Давыдов встречался с ним лично и считал его на удивление среднестатистическим внешне: «Его лицо было слегка смуглым, с правильными чертами. Его нос был не очень большим, но прямым, с небольшим, едва заметным изгибом. Волосы на голове были темно-рыжевато-русыми. ; его брови и ресницы были намного темнее цвета его волос, а голубые глаза, оттененные почти черными ресницами, придавали ему самое приятное выражение … Мужчина, которого я видел, был невысокого роста, чуть больше пяти футов высокий, довольно тяжелый, хотя ему было всего 37 лет ».[260]
Во время наполеоновских войн он был серьезно воспринят британской прессой как опасный тиран, готовый к вторжению. Британские газеты высмеивали Наполеона как вспыльчивого маленького человека и прозвали его «Маленький Бони в сильной форме».[261] Детский стишок предупреждал детей о том, что Бонапарт жадно ест непослушных людей; «призрак «.[262] Ростом 1,57 метра (5 футов 2 дюйма) он был ростом со среднего французского мужчины, но невысокого роста для аристократа или офицера (отчасти поэтому его назначили в артиллерию, поскольку в то время пехота и кавалерия требовали более сильных фигур) .[263] Возможно, он был выше — 1,70 м (5 футов 7 дюймов) из-за разницы во французских дюймах.[264]
Некоторые историки считают, что причина ошибки в его размере на момент смерти была связана с использованием устаревшего старого французского критерия (французская ступня равна 33 см, а английская ступня равна 30,47 см).[263] Наполеон был сторонником метрической системы и не любил старые критерии. Более вероятно, что его рост был 1,57 м (5 футов 2 дюйма), то есть высота, на которой он был измерен на острове Св. Елены (британский остров), поскольку его, скорее всего, измеряли английской меркой, а не мерой Старый французский режим.[263] Наполеон окружил себя высокими телохранителями и получил ласковое прозвище Le Petit Caporal (маленький капрал), что отражает его товарищеские отношения с солдатами, а не его рост.
Когда он стал первым консулом, а затем императором, Наполеон отказался от своей генеральской формы и обычно носил зеленую полковниковую форму (не гусарскую) полковника Королевской армии. Chasseur à Cheval Императорской гвардии, полк, неоднократно служивший его личным эскортом, с большим двурогие. Также он обычно носил (обычно по воскресеньям) синюю форму полковника Императорская гвардия Пешие гренадеры (синие с белыми накладками и красными манжетами). Он также носил Légion d’honneur звезда, медаль и лента, а также Орден Железной Короны украшения, белые во французском стиле кюлоты и белые чулки. Это отличалось от сложной формы с множеством украшений его маршалы и те, кто его окружает.
В более поздние годы он довольно сильно прибавил в весе и приобрел бледный или желтоватый цвет лица, на что обращали внимание современники. Писатель Поль де Кок, увидевший его в 1811 году на балконе Тюильри, назвал Наполеона «желтым, тучным и раздутым».[265] Британский капитан, который встретился с ним в 1815 году, заявил: «Я, как и все остальные, был очень разочарован его внешностью … Он толстый, скорее то, что мы называем пузатым, и хотя его нога имеет хорошую форму, она довольно неуклюжий … Он очень землистый, со светло-серыми глазами и довольно тонкими, жирными каштановыми волосами, и в целом очень противный, похожий на священника парень. «[266]
В фондовый персонаж Наполеона — это до смешного коротышка «мелкий тиран», и это стало клише в массовой культуре. Его часто изображают в большом двурогие шляпа с ручной жилет Жест — отсылка к картине 1812 года Жака-Луи Давида.[267] В 1908 г. Альфред Адлер, психолог, процитировал Наполеона, чтобы описать комплекс неполноценности при котором невысокие люди проявляют чрезмерно агрессивное поведение, чтобы компенсировать недостаток роста; это вдохновило термин Наполеон комплекс.[268]
Реформы
Наполеон ввел различные реформы, такие как высшее образование, Налоговый кодекс, дорожных и канализационных сетей и установил Banque de France, первый центральный банк в истории Франции. Он вел переговоры Конкордат 1801 года с католической церковью, которая стремилась примирить большинство католиков с его режимом. Он был представлен вместе с Органические статьи, который регулировал публичное богослужение во Франции. Он распустил Святая Римская Империя до Объединение Германии позже в 19 веке. Продажа территории Луизианы Соединенным Штатам увеличила размер Соединенных Штатов вдвое.[269]
В мае 1802 г. он учредил Почетный легион, заменитель старых роялистских украшений и рыцарские ордена, чтобы поощрять гражданские и военные достижения; орден до сих пор остается высшей наградой во Франции.[270]
Наполеоновский кодекс
Наполеона свод гражданских законов, то Гражданский кодекс— ныне известный как Кодекс Наполеона — был подготовлен комитетами экспертов-юристов под руководством Жан Жак Режи де Камбасерес, то Второй консул. Наполеон активно участвовал в заседаниях Государственный совет вот доработал проекты. Разработка кода кардинально изменила характер гражданский закон правовая система с упором на четко прописанный и доступный закон. Другие коды («Коды les cinq «) были поручены Наполеоном кодифицировать уголовное и торговое право; был опубликован Уголовный кодекс, который вводил в действие правила из-за процесса.[271]
Кодекс Наполеона был принят на большей части континентальной Европы, но только на завоеванных им землях, и оставался в силе после поражения Наполеона. Наполеон сказал: «Моя настоящая слава не в том, что я выиграл сорок сражений … Ватерлоо сотрет память о стольких победах … Но … то, что будет жить вечно, — это мой Гражданский кодекс».[272] Кодекс влияет на четверть мировых юрисдикций, таких как континентальная Европа, Америка и Африка.[273]
Дитер Ланжевише описал код как «революционный проект», который стимулировал разработку буржуазное общество в Германии расширением права собственности и ускорением к концу феодализм. Наполеон реорганизовал то, что раньше было Священной Римской империей, состоящее из более чем тысячи субъектов,[количественно оценить ] в более обтекаемую форму из сорока штатов Конфедерация Рейна; это помогло продвинуть Германская конфедерация и объединение Германии в 1871 г.[274]
Движение к национальному объединению в Италии было также ускорено правлением Наполеона.[275] Эти изменения способствовали развитию национализма и национальное государство.[276]
Наполеон провел широкий спектр либеральных реформ во Франции и по всей континентальной Европе, особенно в Италии и Германии, как резюмировал британский историк. Эндрю Робертс:
Идеи, лежащие в основе нашего современного мира — меритократия, равенство перед законом, права собственности, религиозная терпимость, современное светское образование, надежные финансы и т. Д. — были поддержаны, консолидированы, систематизированы и географически расширены Наполеоном. К ним он добавил рациональную и эффективную местную администрацию, конец сельскому бандитизму, поощрение науки и искусства, отмену феодализма и самую большую кодификацию законов со времен падения Римской империи.[277]
Наполеон напрямую сверг остатки феодализма в большей части Западной континентальной Европы. Он либерализовал законы о собственности, закончился сеньоры отменила гильдия торговцев и ремесленников, чтобы облегчить предпринимательство, узаконить развод, закрыть Еврейские гетто и уравнял евреев со всеми остальными. В Инквизиция закончился, как и Святая Римская Империя. Резко сократилась власть церковных судов и религиозной власти. равенство перед законом был провозглашен для всех мужчин.[278]
Военное дело
Статуя в Шербур-Октевиль открыт Наполеоном III в 1858 году. Наполеон I укрепил оборону города, чтобы предотвратить вторжение британских военно-морских сил.
В области военная организация, Наполеон заимствовал у предыдущих теоретиков, таких как Жак Антуан Ипполит, граф де Гиберт, и из реформ предыдущего французского правительства, а затем разработали многое из того, что уже было на месте. Он продолжил политику продвижения по службе, основанную прежде всего на заслугах, возникшую в результате революции.[279]
Корпус заменил дивизии как самые крупные армейские части, мобильная артиллерия была интегрирована в резервные батареи, штабная система стала более подвижной, и кавалерия вернулась в качестве важного формирования французской военной доктрины. Эти методы теперь упоминаются как основные черты наполеоновской войны.[279] Хотя он закрепил практику современной воинская повинность введенный Директорией, одним из первых актов восстановленной монархии было ее прекращение.[280]
Его противники извлекли уроки из нововведений Наполеона. Повышенное значение артиллерии после 1807 года было связано с созданием им высокомобильных артиллерийских сил, увеличением количества артиллерии и изменениями в артиллерийской практике. В результате этих факторов Наполеон, вместо того, чтобы полагаться на пехоту для ослабления обороны врага, теперь мог использовать массированную артиллерию в качестве острия, чтобы пробить прорыв в линии врага, который затем использовался для поддержки пехоты и кавалерии. МакКонахи отвергает альтернативную теорию о том, что растущая зависимость французской армии от артиллерии, начиная с 1807 года, была результатом ухудшения качества французской пехоты, а затем и неполноценности Франции в численности кавалерии.[281] Оружие и другие виды военной техники оставались неизменными в революционную и наполеоновскую эпоху, но в 18 веке оперативная мобильность претерпел изменения.[282]
Наибольшее влияние Наполеон оказал на ведение войны. Антуан-Анри Жомини объяснил методы Наполеона в широко используемом учебнике, который повлиял на все европейские и американские армии.[283] Наполеон считался влиятельным военным теоретиком Карл фон Клаузевиц как гений оперативного военного искусства, а историки причисляют его к великому полководцу.[284] Веллингтон, когда его спросили, кто был величайшим генералом того времени, ответил: «В этом веке, в прошлые века, в любую эпоху, Наполеон».[285]
При Наполеоне возник новый акцент на уничтожении, а не только на перехитрении вражеских армий. Вторжения на вражескую территорию происходили на более широких фронтах, что делало войны более дорогостоящими и более решительными. Политический эффект войны увеличился; поражение для европейской державы означало нечто большее, чем потеря изолированных анклавов. Около-Карфагенские миры переплелись целые национальные усилия, усилив революционный феномен тотальной войны.[286]
Метрическая система
Официальное введение метрической системы в сентябре 1799 г. было непопулярно в широких слоях французского общества. Правление Наполеона значительно способствовало принятию нового стандарта не только во Франции, но и во Франции. сфера влияния. Наполеон сделал шаг назад в 1812 году, когда принял закон о введении mesures usuelles (традиционные единицы измерения) для розничной торговли,[287] система измерения, напоминающая дореволюционные единицы, но основанная на килограмме и метре; например, Livre Metrique (метрический фунт) был 500 г,[288] в отличие от стоимости Ливр дю Рой (королевский фунт), 489,5 г.[289] Другие единицы измерения округлялись аналогичным образом до окончательного введения метрической системы в некоторых частях Европы в середине 19 века.[290]
Образование
Образовательные реформы Наполеона заложили основу современной системы образования во Франции и в большей части Европы.[291] Наполеон синтезировал лучшие академические элементы из Ancien Régime, Просвещение, и революция, с целью создания стабильного, хорошо образованного и процветающего общества. Он сделал французский единственным официальным языком. Он оставил некоторое начальное образование в руках религиозных орденов, но предложил государственную поддержку среднему образованию. Наполеон основал ряд государственных средних школ (лицеи ), разработанная для создания стандартизированного образования, единого для всей Франции.[292]
Все студенты обучались наукам наряду с современными и классическими языками. В отличие от системы во время Ancien Régime, религиозные темы не преобладали в учебной программе, хотя они присутствовали вместе с учителями из духовенства. Наполеон надеялся использовать религию для обеспечения социальной стабильности.[292] Он уделял особое внимание передовым центрам, таким как Политехническая школа, которые предоставляли как военную экспертизу, так и самые современные исследования в области науки.[293] Наполеон предпринял одни из первых усилий по созданию системы светского и общественного образования.[когда? ] Система предусматривала стипендии и строгую дисциплину, в результате чего французская образовательная система превзошла свои европейские аналоги, многие из которых были заимствованы из французской системы.[294]
Память и оценка
Критика
В политической сфере историки спорят о том, был ли Наполеон «просвещенным деспотом, заложившим основы современной Европы» или «страдающим манией величия, который принес больше страданий, чем любой человек до прихода Гитлера».[295] Многие историки пришли к выводу, что у него были грандиозные внешнеполитические амбиции. Континентальные державы еще в 1808 году были готовы отдать ему почти все его достижения и титулы, но некоторые ученые утверждают, что он был чрезмерно агрессивным и настаивал на слишком большом, пока его империя не рухнула.[296][297]
Наполеон положил конец беззаконию и беспорядку в послереволюционной Франции.[298] Его считали тираном и узурпатор его оппонентами.[299] Его критики[кто? ] обвинение в том, что его не беспокоит перспектива войны и смерти тысяч, превратили его поиски неоспоримого правления в серию конфликтов по всей Европе и игнорировали как договоры, так и конвенции. Его роль в Гаитянская революция и решение восстановить рабство в заморских колониях Франции являются спорными и влияют на его репутацию.[300]
Наполеон узаконил грабеж завоеванных территорий: французские музеи содержат произведения искусства, украденные войсками Наполеона со всей Европы. Артефакты были доставлены в Musée du Louvre для большого центрального музея; его пример позже послужит вдохновением для более известных подражателей.[301] Его сравнивали с Адольф Гитлер историком Питер Гейл в 1947 г.,[302] и Клод Риббе в 2005 году.[303] Дэвид Г. Чендлер, историк наполеоновской войны, писал в 1973 году, что «Ничто не могло быть более унизительным для первого [Наполеона] и более лестного для последнего [Гитлера]. Сравнение одиозно. В целом Наполеон был вдохновлен благородной мечтой, совершенно непохожий на Гитлера … Наполеон оставил великие и непреходящие свидетельства своего гения — в кодексах закона и национальной идентичности, которые сохранились до наших дней. Адольф Гитлер не оставил ничего, кроме разрушения ».[304]
Критики утверждают, что истинное наследие Наполеона должно отражать потерю статуса Франции и ненужные смерти, принесенные его правлением: историк Виктор Дэвис Хэнсон пишет: «В конце концов, военные рекорды неоспоримы — возможно, 17 лет войн. шесть миллионов европейцев погибли Франция обанкротилась, ее заморские колонии потеряны ».[305] Маклинн заявляет, что «его можно рассматривать как человека, который отбросил назад европейскую экономическую жизнь на целое поколение из-за разрушительного воздействия своих войн».[299] Винсент Кронин отвечает, что такая критика основана на ошибочной предпосылке о том, что Наполеон несет ответственность за войны, носящие его имя, в то время как на самом деле Франция стала жертвой ряда коалиций, направленных на уничтожение идеалов революции.[306]
Британский военный историк Коррелли Барнетт называет его «социальным неудачником», который использовал Францию в своих личных целях, страдающих манией величия. Он говорит, что репутация Наполеона преувеличена.[307] Французский ученый Жан Тулар представил влиятельный отчет о своем образе спасителя.[308] Луи Бержерон высоко оценил многочисленные изменения, которые он внес во французское общество, особенно в отношении закона и образования.[309] Его величайшим провалом было российское вторжение. Многие историки обвиняют Наполеона в плохом планировании, но российские ученые вместо этого подчеркивают реакцию России, отмечая, что пресловутая зимняя погода была столь же тяжелой для защитников.[310]
Большая и растущая историография на французском, английском, русском, испанском и других языках была обобщена и оценена многими учеными.[311][312][313]
Пропаганда и память
Использование Наполеоном пропаганды способствовало его приходу к власти, узаконивало его режим и создавало его имидж для потомков. Строгая цензура, контроль над прессой, книгами, театром и искусством были частью его пропагандистской схемы, направленной на то, чтобы изобразить его как приносящего отчаянно желаемый мир и стабильность во Франции. Пропагандистская риторика изменилась в связи с событиями и атмосферой правления Наполеона, сосредоточившись в первую очередь на его роли генерала в армии и идентификации в качестве солдата, а затем перешла к его роли императора и гражданского лидера. Специально ориентируясь на свою гражданскую аудиторию, Наполеон наладил отношения с сообществом современного искусства, играя активную роль в создании и контроле различных форм художественного производства в соответствии со своими пропагандистскими целями.[314]
В Англии, России и по всей Европе — но не во Франции — Наполеон был популярной темой карикатуры.[315][316][317]
Hazareesingh (2004) исследует, как лучше всего понимать образ и память Наполеона. Они сыграли ключевую роль в коллективном политическом неповиновении реставрационной монархии Бурбонов в 1815–1830 годах. Люди из разных слоев общества и регионов Франции, особенно ветераны Наполеона, опирались на наполеоновское наследие и его связь с идеалами революции 1789 года.[318]
Широко распространенные слухи о возвращении Наполеона с острова Св. Елены и Наполеона в качестве вдохновения для патриотизма, индивидуальных и коллективных свобод и политической мобилизации проявились в крамольных материалах, изображающих триколор и розетки. Были также подрывные действия по празднованию годовщин жизни и правления Наполеона и срыву королевских торжеств — они продемонстрировали преобладающую и успешную цель различных сторонников Наполеона по постоянной дестабилизации режима Бурбонов.[318]
Датта (2005) показывает, что после краха милитаристской Буланжизм в конце 1880-х годов наполеоновская легенда была оторвана от партийной политики и возродилась в массовой культуре. Сосредоточение внимания на двух пьесах и двух романах того периода -Викторьен Сарду с Мадам Санс-Жен (1893), Морис Баррес с Les Déracinés (1897), Эдмон Ростан с L’Aiglon (1900), и Андре де Лорд и Gyp с Наполеонетта (1913) — Датта исследует, как писатели и критики Belle Époque использовал наполеоновскую легенду в различных политических и культурных целях.[319]
Сведенный до второстепенного персонажа, новый вымышленный Наполеон стал не всемирно-исторической фигурой, а личностью, созданной индивидуальными потребностями и использовавшейся как популярное развлечение. В своих попытках изобразить императора как фигуру национального единства сторонники и противники Третьей республики использовали легенду как средство исследования тревог по поводу пола и опасений по поводу процессов демократизации, сопровождавших эту новую эру массовой политики и культуры.[319]
Международные наполеоновские конгрессы проводятся регулярно с участием представителей французских и американских военных, французских политиков и ученых из разных стран.[320] В январе 2012 г. мэр из Montereau-Fault-Yonne, недалеко от Парижа — на месте поздняя победа Наполеона — предложенная разработка Бивуак Наполеона, мемориальный тематический парк с проектной стоимостью 200 миллионов евро.[321]
Долгосрочное влияние за пределами Франции
Наполеон был ответственным за распространение ценностей Французской революции в других странах, особенно в правовой реформе.[322] Наполеон не трогал крепостное право в России.[323]
После падения Наполеона Кодекс Наполеона не только сохранился в завоеванных странах, включая Нидерланды, Бельгию, части Италии и Германии, но и использовался в качестве основы для определенных частей законодательства за пределами Европы, включая Доминиканскую Республику, штат США. Луизианы и канадской провинции Квебек.[324] Код также использовался в качестве модели во многих частях Латинской Америки.[325] Память о Наполеоне в Польше благоприятна из-за его поддержки независимости и противостояния России, его правового кодекса, отмены крепостного права и введения современной бюрократии среднего класса.[326]
Наполеона можно было считать одним из основателей современной Германии. После растворения Святая Римская Империя, он сократил количество немецких земель с 300 до менее чем 50 до Объединение Германии. Побочным продуктом французской оккупации стало сильное развитие в Немецкий национализм. Наполеон также значительно помог Соединенным Штатам, когда он согласился продавать территории Луизианы за 15 миллионов долларов во время президентства Томас Джефферсон. Эта территория почти вдвое увеличила размер Соединенных Штатов, добавив к Союзу 13 штатов.[269]
С 1796 по 2020 год включительно не менее 95 кораблей, связанных с именем Императора Франции, были определены как объект нематериального наследия. В 21 веке не менее 18 кораблей Наполеона эксплуатируются под флагом Индонезия, Германия, Италия, Австралия, Аргентина, Индия, Нидерланды, объединенное Королевство и Франция.[327]
Жены, любовницы и дети
Наполеон женился Жозефина (урожденная Мари Жозеф Роуз Ташер де Ла Пагери) в 1796 году, когда ему было 26 лет; она была 32-летней вдовой, чей первый муж, Александр де Богарне, был казнен во время Террор. Через пять дней после смерти Александра де Богарне, инициатор правления террора Максимилиан де Робеспьер был свергнут и казнен, и с помощью высокопоставленных друзей Жозефина была освобождена.[328] До встречи с Бонапартом она была известна как «Роза», имя, которое он не любил. Вместо этого он называл ее «Жозефина», и отныне она носила это имя. Бонапарт часто посылал ей любовные письма во время своих кампаний.[329] Он формально усыновил ее сына Эжен и троюродный брат (через брак) Стефани и устраивал для них династические браки. Жозефина родила дочь Гортензия выйти замуж за брата Наполеона Луи.[330]
У Жозефины были любовники, такие как Лейтенант Ипполит Чарльз, во время итальянской кампании Наполеона.[331] Наполеон узнал об этом деле, и написанное им письмо было перехвачено британцами и широко опубликовано, чтобы поставить Наполеона в неловкое положение. У Наполеона тоже были свои дела: во время египетской кампании он взял Полин Беллисль Фурес, жена младшего офицера, как его любовница. Она стала известна как «Клеопатра».[г][333]
В то время как любовницы Наполеона рожали от него детей, Жозефина не произвела на свет наследника, возможно, из-за стрессов ее заключения во время правления террора или из-за аборта, который она, возможно, сделала в свои двадцать с небольшим.[334] Наполеон выбрал развод, чтобы снова жениться в поисках наследника. Несмотря на развод с Жозефиной, Наполеон проявлял к ней свою преданность до конца своей жизни. Услышав известие о ее смерти во время изгнания на Эльбу, он заперся в своей комнате и не выходил в течение двух полных дней.[192] Ее имя также будет его последним словом на смертном одре в 1821 году.
11 марта 1810 г. доверенное лицо, он женился на 19-летней девушке Мари Луиза, Эрцгерцогиня Австрии и племянница Мария Антуанетта. Таким образом, он женился на Немецкая королевская и императорская семья.[335] Луиза была менее чем довольна такой договоренностью, по крайней мере, сначала, заявив: «Просто увидеть этого человека было бы худшей формой пытки». Ее двоюродную бабушку казнили во Франции, а Наполеон на протяжении всей своей военной карьеры участвовал в многочисленных кампаниях против Австрии. Однако со временем она, казалось, стала к нему относиться теплее. После свадьбы она написала отцу: «Он очень меня любит. Я искренне отвечаю на его любовь. В нем есть что-то очень привлекательное и очень нетерпеливое, перед которым невозможно устоять».[192]
Наполеон и Мария-Луиза оставались женатыми до его смерти, хотя она не присоединилась к нему в изгнании на Эльбе и с тех пор больше никогда не видела своего мужа. У пары был один ребенок, Наполеон Фрэнсис Джозеф Чарльз (1811–1832), с рождения известный как Король Рима. Он стал Наполеоном II в 1814 году и правил всего две недели. Он был удостоен титула герцога Рейхштадта в 1818 году и умер от туберкулез 21 год, детей нет.[335]
Наполеон признал одного внебрачного сына: Шарль Леон (1806–1881) по Элеонора Денуэль де ла Плен.[336] Александр Колонна-Валевски (1810–1868), сын любовницы Мария Валевска, хотя и признанный мужем Валевской, также был широко известен как его ребенок, и ДНК его прямого потомка мужского пола использовалась, чтобы помочь подтвердить принадлежность Наполеона. Гаплотип Y-хромосомы.[337] Возможно, у него были и другие незаконнорожденные дети, которых никто не признал, например Ойген Мегерле фон Мюльфельд от Эмили Виктория Краус[338] и Элен Наполеоне Бонапарт (1816–1907) по Альбина де Монтолон.
Смотрите также
- Арененберг
- Титулы и стили Наполеона
Заметки
- ^ Хотя Версальский договор 1768 г. формально уступила права Корсики, но оставалась незарегистрированной в течение 1769 г.[11] пока он не стал провинция Франции в 1770 г.[12] Корсика будет юридически интегрирована как департамент в 1789 г.[13][14]
- ^ Помимо его имени, похоже, нет никакой связи между ним и Теорема наполеона.[27]
- ^ В основном его называли Бонапартом, пока он не стал первым консулом на всю жизнь.[31]
- ^ Это изображено в Бонапарт пересекает Альпы от Ипполит Деларош и в императорском доме Жака-Луи Давида Наполеон пересекает Альпы. Менее реалистично он изображен на зарядное устройство в последней работе.[86]
- ^ Было принято бросать посмертную маску вождя. Известно, что существует по крайней мере четыре подлинных посмертных маски Наполеона: одна в Кабильдо в Новом Орлеане, один в музее Ливерпуля, другой в Гаване и один в библиотеке Университет Северной Каролины.[212]
- ^ Организм может переносить большие дозы мышьяка при регулярном приеме внутрь, а мышьяк был модным панацея.[219]
- ^ Однажды ночью во время незаконной связи с актрисой Маргаритой Джордж у Наполеона случился серьезный приступ. Этот и другие более незначительные приступы заставили историков спорить о том, болел ли он эпилепсией, и если да, то до какой степени.[332]
Цитаты
- ^ «Наполеон», «Бонапарт». Полный словарь Random House Webster.
- ^ а б Робертс, Эндрю. Наполеон: Жизнь. Penguin Group, 2014, Введение.
- ^ Чарльз Мессенджер, изд. (2001). Справочник по военной истории. Рутледж. С. 391–427. ISBN 978-1-135-95970-8. В архиве из оригинала от 22 октября 2015 г.
- ^ Болезнь, Мартин (26 октября 2001 г.). Исламский мир в упадке: от Карловицкого договора до распада Османской империи. Издательская группа «Гринвуд». ISBN 9780275968915 — через Google Книги.
- ^ Кошик Рой, Война, культура и общество в Южной Азии раннего Нового времени, 1740–1849 гг., (Рутледж, 2011), 77.
- ^ Эндрю Робертс, Наполеон: Жизнь (2014), стр. xxxiii.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 2
- ^ Гениффи, Патрис (13 апреля 2015 г.). Бонапарт. Издательство Гарвардского университета. С. 21–22. ISBN 9780674426016.
- ^ а б Дуайер 2008, ch 1
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. xv
- ^ а б Маклинн 1998, п. 6
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 20
- ^ «Корсика | История, география и достопримечательности». Энциклопедия Британника. В архиве из оригинала 28 ноября 2017 г.. Получено 23 января 2018.
- ^ Робертс, Эндрю (2014). Наполеон: Жизнь. Пингвин. ISBN 978-0698176287. В архиве из оригинала 25 февраля 2018 г.
- ^ а б Кронин 1994, стр. 20–21.
- ^ Чемберлен, Александр (1896). Детство и детство в народной мысли: (Ребенок в первобытной культуре), с. 385. Макмиллан.
- ^ Кронин 1994, стр. 27
- ^ а б c Международная школа истории (8 февраля 2012 г.), Приход Наполеона к власти, в архиве из оригинала 8 мая 2015 г., получено 29 января 2018
- ^ Джонсон, Пол (2006). Наполеон: Жизнь. Пингвин. ISBN 978-0143037453. В архиве из оригинала 25 февраля 2018 г.
- ^ а б c Робертс 2001, стр. xvi
- ^ Робертс, Эндрю (4 ноября 2011 г.). Наполеон: Жизнь. Пингвин. ISBN 9780698176287.
- ^ а б c d Паркер, Гарольд Т. (1971). «Становление личности Наполеона: исследовательский очерк». Французские исторические исследования. 7 (1): 6–26. Дои:10.2307/286104. JSTOR 286104.
- ^ Адамс, Майкл (2014). Наполеон и Россия. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0826442123. В архиве из оригинала 25 февраля 2018 г.
- ^ Робертс, Эндрю (2014). Наполеон: Жизнь. Пингвин. п. 11. ISBN 978-0698176287.
… овладев [базовым] французским языком в апреле 1779 года, за четыре месяца до своего 10-летия …
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 18
- ^ Грегуар, Анри (1790). «Сообщите о необходимости и средствах уничтожения наречия и универсализации использования французского языка». Wikisource (На французском). Париж: Французский национальный конгресс. Получено 16 января 2020.
[…] количество людей, говорящих на нем чисто, не превышает трех миллионов; и наверное тех, кто пишет правильно, еще меньше.
- ^ Уэллс 1992, стр. 74
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 21 год
- ^ а б Дуайер 2008, п. 42
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 26
- ^ а б Маклинн 1998, п. 290
- ^ Дэвид Николлс (1999). Наполеон: биографический компаньон. ABC-CLIO. п.131. ISBN 978-0874369571.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 55
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 61
- ^ а б c d е Робертс 2001, стр. xviii
- ^ Робертс, Эндрю (2011). Наполеон: Жизнь. Пингвин. ISBN 978-0698176287.
- ^ «Наполеон I | Биография, достижения и факты». Энциклопедия Британника. В архиве с оригинала 12 января 2018 г.. Получено 23 января 2018.
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 132
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 76
- ^ Чендлер 1973, п. 30
- ^ Патрис Гениффи, Бонапарт: 1769–1802 гг. (Гарвардский университет, 2015), стр. 137–59.
- ^ Бурриен, Воспоминания о Наполеоне, п. 39
- ^ Бурриен, Воспоминания о Наполеоне, п. 38
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 157
- ^ Маклинн 1998, стр.76, 84
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 92
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 26
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 164
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 93
- ^ а б Маклинн 1998, п. 96
- ^ Джонсон 2002, стр. 27
- ^ Карлайл, Томас (1896). «Произведения Томаса Карлейля — Французская революция, том III, книга 3.VII». В архиве из оригинала от 20 марта 2015 г.
- ^ Энглунд (2010), стр. 92–94.
- ^ Белл 2015, п. 29.
- ^ Дуайер 2008, стр. 284–85
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 132
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 145
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 142
- ^ Харви 2006, стр. 179
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 135
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 306
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 305
- ^ Белл 2015, п. 30.
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 322
- ^ а б c Watson 2003, стр. 13–14.
- ^ Амини 2000, стр. 12
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 342
- ^ Энглунд (2010), стр. 127–28.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 175
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 179
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 372
- ^ а б c d Робертс 2001, стр. хх
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 392
- ^ Дуайер 2008, стр. 411–24
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 189
- ^ Гениффи, Бонапарт: 1769–1802 гг. С. 500–02.
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 442
- ^ а б c Коннелли 2006, стр. 57
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 444
- ^ Дуайер 2008, п. 455
- ^ Франсуа Фюре, Французская революция 1770–1814 гг. (1996), стр. 212
- ^ Жорж Лефевр, Наполеон из 18 брюмера в Тильзит 1799–1807 гг. (1969), стр. 60–68
- ^ а б c d Лион 1994, п. 111
- ^ Лефевр, Наполеон из 18 брюмера в Тильзит 1799–1807 гг. (1969), стр. 71–92.
- ^ Холт, Люциус Хадсон; Чилтон, Александр Уиллер (1919). Краткая история Европы 1789–1815 гг.. Макмиллан. п.206.
Август 1802 г. референдум наполеон.
- ^ Чендлер 2002, п. 51
- ^ Чендлер 1966, стр. 279–81
- ^ а б Маклинн 1998, п. 235
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 292
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 293
- ^ а б c Чендлер 1966, п. 296
- ^ а б Чендлер 1966, стр. 298–304
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 301
- ^ Шом 1997, п. 302
- ^ а б Лион 1994, стр. 111–14
- ^ а б c d Лион 1994, п. 113
- ^ Эдвардс 1999, стр. 55
- ^ Джеймс, К. Л. Р. Черные якобинцы: Туссен Л’Увертюр и революция в Сан-Доминго, [1963] (Penguin Books, 2001), стр. 141-2.
- ^ Сью Пибоди, Французская эмансипация https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199730414/obo-9780199730414-0253.xml По состоянию на 27 октября 2019 г.
- ^ «10 мая 1802 года», последний крик невинности и отчаяния.««. герой (На французском). Получено 6 декабря 2019.
- ^ Робертс, Эндрю. Наполеон: Жизнь. Penguin Group, 2014, стр. 301
- ^ Джеймс, К. Л. Р. (1963) [1938]. Черные якобинцы (2-е изд.). Нью-Йорк: старинные книги. стр.45 –55. OCLC 362702.
- ^ «ХРОНОЛОГИЯ — Кто когда запретил рабство?». Рейтер. Thomson Reuters. 22 марта 2007 г.. Получено 27 октября 2019.
- ^ Олдфилд, доктор Джон (17 февраля 2011 г.). «Британское антирабовство». История BBC. BBC. Получено 27 октября 2019.
- ^ Перри, Джеймс Высокомерные армии Великие военные катастрофы и стоящие за ними генералы(Эдисон: Castle Books, 2005), страницы 78–79.
- ^ Кристер Петли, Белая ярость: ямайский рабовладелец и эпоха революции (Оксфорд: Oxford University Press, 2018), стр. 182.
- ^ Робертс, Эндрю. Наполеон: Жизнь. Penguin Group, 2014, стр. 303
- ^ Коннелли 2006, стр. 70
- ^ R.B. Mowat, Дипломатия Наполеона (1924) это онлайн-опрос; о недавней продвинутой дипломатической истории см. Paul W. Schroeder, Трансформация европейской политики 1763–1848 гг. (Oxford U.P. 1996) стр. 177–560.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 265
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 243
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 296
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 297
- ^ Де Ремуса, Клэр Элизабет, Воспоминания мадам де Ремюзат, 1802–1808 Том 1, HardPress Publishing, 2012, 542 с., ISBN 978-1290517478.
- ^ а б c d Робертс, Эндрю. Наполеон: Жизнь. Penguin Group, 2014, стр. 355.
- ^ Двайер, Филипп (2015). «‘Гражданин император: политический ритуал, народный суверенитет и коронация Наполеона I ». История. 100 (339): 40–57. Дои:10.1111 / 1468-229X.12089. ISSN 1468-229X.
- ^ Пол В. Шредер, Трансформация европейской политики 1763–1848 гг. (1996) стр. 231–86
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 328. Между тем французские территориальные переустройства в Германии произошли без консультации с Россией и аннексий Наполеона в Германии. По долине все обострялись отношения между ними.
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 331
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 323
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 332
- ^ а б Чендлер 1966, п. 333
- ^ Майкл Дж. Хьюз, Создание Grande Armée Наполеона: мотивация, военная культура и мужественность во французской армии, 1800–1808 гг. (NYU Press, 2012).
- ^ а б Маклинн 1998, п. 321
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 332
- ^ Ричард Брукс (редактор), Атлас мировой военной истории. п. 108
- ^ Эндрю Уффинделл, Великие генералы наполеоновских войн. п. 15
- ^ Ричард Брукс (редактор), Атлас мировой военной истории. п. 156.
- ^ Ричард Брукс (редактор), Атлас мировой военной истории. п. 156. «Это историческое клише — сравнивать план Шлиффена с Ганнибал тактическое окружение Канны (216 г. до н.э.); Шлиффен был больше обязан стратегическому маневру Наполеона на Ульме (1805 г.) ».
- ^ Дэвид Г. Чендлер, Походы Наполеона. п. 407
- ^ а б c Адриан Гилберт (2000). Энциклопедия войны: с древнейших времен до наших дней. Тейлор и Фрэнсис. п. 133. ISBN 978-1-57958-216-6. В архиве из оригинала 29 июля 2014 г.. Получено 11 июля 2014.
- ^ Schom 1997, стр. 414
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 350
- ^ Кронин 1994, стр. 344
- ^ Карш 2001, стр. 12
- ^ Больной 2001, п. 99.
- ^ Майкл В. Леггьер (2015). Наполеон и Берлин: франко-прусская война в Северной Германии, 1813 г.. п. 9. ISBN 978-0806180175. В архиве из оригинала 18 ноября 2016 г.
- ^ а б c Чендлер, 1966, стр. 467–68.
- ^ а б c Брукс 2000, стр. 110
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 497
- ^ Жак Годешо и др. Наполеоновская эпоха в Европе (1971) стр. 126–39
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 370
- ^ а б Август Фурнье (1911). Наполеон I: Биография. Х. Холт. п.459.
- ^ Робертс 2014 С. 458–59.
- ^ Робертс 2014 С. 459–61.
- ^ Хорн, Алистер (1997). Как далеко от Аустерлица? Наполеон 1805–1815 гг.. Пан Макмиллан. п. 238. ISBN 978-1743285404. В архиве из оригинала 25 февраля 2018 г.
- ^ Тодд Фишер и Грегори Фремонт-Барнс, Наполеоновские войны: расцвет и падение империи. п. 197.
- ^ Фишер и Фремонт-Барнс, стр. 198–99.
- ^ Фишер и Фремонт-Барнс стр. 199.
- ^ Энгман, Макс (26 октября 2016 г.). «Финляндия и Наполеоновская империя». В Planert, Юте (ред.). Империя Наполеона. Palgrave Macmillan UK. С. 227–238. Дои:10.1057/9781137455475_16. ISBN 978-1-349-56731-7 — через Springer Link.
- ^ «Эрфуртская конвенция 1808 г.». Napoleon-series.org. В архиве из оригинала 21 октября 2013 г.. Получено 22 апреля 2013.
- ^ Фишер и Фремонт-Барнс стр. 205.
- ^ а б Чендлер 1966, стр. 659–60
- ^ Джон Линч, Каудильо в Испанской Америке 1800–1850 гг.. Оксфорд: Clarendon Press 1992, стр. 402–03.
- ^ а б c Фишер и Фремонт-Барнс, стр. 106.
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 690
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 701
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 705
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 706
- ^ Чендлер 1966, п. 707
- ^ а б Дэвид Г. Чендлер, Походы Наполеона. п. 708
- ^ Дэвид Г. Чендлер, Походы Наполеона. п. 720
- ^ Дэвид Г. Чендлер, Походы Наполеона. п. 729
- ^ «Британский экспедиционный корпус в Вальхерене: 1809 г.». napoleon-series.org. Архивировано из оригинал 18 июля 2011 г.. Получено 1 февраля 2015.
- ^ а б Тодд Фишер и Грегори Фремонт-Барнс, Наполеоновские войны: расцвет и падение империи. п. 144.
- ^ Дэвид Г. Чендлер, Походы Наполеона. п. 732.
- ^ Дэвид Уоткин, Римский форум. Кембридж, Массачусетс: Издательство Гарвардского университета, 2012. 183.ISBN 9780674063679books.google.com/books?id=cRrufMNLOhwC&pg=PA183
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 378
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 495
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 507
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 506
- ^ Маклинн 1998, стр. 504–05
- ^ Харви 2006, стр. 773
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 518
- ^ Маркхэм 1988, стр. 194
- ^ «Наполеон1812». napoleon-1812.nl. В архиве из оригинала от 13 февраля 2016 г.
- ^ Маркхэм 1988, стр.190, 199
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 541
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 549
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 565
- ^ Чандлер 1995, стр. 1020
- ^ а б Райли, Дж. П. (2013). Наполеон и мировая война 1813 года: уроки боевых действий коалиций. Рутледж. п. 206. ISBN 978-1136321351. В архиве из оригинала от 23 сентября 2015 г.
- ^ Леггьер (2007). Падение Наполеона: Том 1, Вторжение союзников во Францию, 1813–1814 гг.. С. 53–54. ISBN 978-0521875424. В архиве из оригинала 21 сентября 2015 г.
- ^ Фремонт-Барнс 2004, стр. 14
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 585
- ^ Ворота 2003, п. 259.
- ^ Ливен, Доминик (2010). Россия против Наполеона: правдивая история кампании войны и мира. Пингвин. С. 484–85. ISBN 978-1101429389. В архиве из оригинала от 20 марта 2015 г.
- ^ «Акт отречения Наполеона». Bulletin des Lois de la Republique Française. Июль 1814 г. В архиве из оригинала 22 декабря 2011 г.. Получено 28 августа 2009.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, стр. 593–94
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 597
- ^ Латсон, Дженнифер. «Почему Наполеону, вероятно, следовало в первый раз остаться в изгнании». В архиве из оригинала 25 июня 2016 г.
- ^ а б c «PBS — Наполеон: Наполеон и Жозефина». В архиве с оригинала от 21 августа 2017 года.
- ^ а б c Маклинн 1998, п. 604
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 605
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 607
- ^ Чесни 2006, стр. 35 год
- ^ Соответственно 2004, стр. 254
- ^ Кокс, Дейл (2015). Застава Николлса: форт войны 1812 года в Чаттахучи, Флорида. Старые кухонные книги. п. 87. ISBN 978-0692379363.
- ^ Хибберт, Кристофер (2003). Женщины Наполеона. W. W. Norton & Company. п. 272. ISBN 978-0393324990. Получено 5 апреля 2018.
- ^ Информация, Reed Business (28 октября 1982 г.). «Формы Наполеона». Новый ученый: 257.
- ^ Schom 1997, стр. 769–70
- ^ «Два дня на Святой Елене». Дух английских журналов: Монро и Фрэнсис. 1832: 402. Получено 5 апреля 2018.
- ^ Джонс, Дэвид (14 октября 1982 г.). «Особый случай обоев Наполеона». Новый ученый: 101.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 642
- ^ Я, Наполеон; Маршан, Луи Жозеф (29 октября 2017 г.). Хроники войн Цезаря: первый в истории перевод. Перевод Барзани, Аршан (1 изд.). Clio Books. В архиве из оригинала от 3 декабря 2017 г.
- ^ Хикс, Питер. «Уроки английского Наполеона». Napoleon.org. Архивировано из оригинал 18 сентября 2016 г.. Получено 24 марта 2018.
- ^ Уилкинс 1972
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 651
- ^ Альберт Бенхаму, Внутри Лонгвуда — тайные письма Барри О’Мира В архиве 11 декабря 2012 г. Wayback Machine, 2012
- ^ а б c Маклинн 1998, п. 655
- ^ Робертс, Наполеон (2014) 799–801
- ^ Фулгум 2007
- ^ Уилсон, 1975, стр. 293–95.
- ^ Дрискель 1993, стр. 168
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 656
- ^ Джонсон, 2002, стр. 180–81.
- ^ а б c Каллен, 2008, стр. 146–48.
- ^ а б Каллен 2008, стр. 156
- ^ Каллен 2008, стр. 50
- ^ Каллен 2008, стр. 161 и Hindmarsh et al. 2008, стр. 2092
- ^ а б «Империя и Сен-Сьеж». Napoleon.org. В архиве из оригинала 19 сентября 2011 г.. Получено 15 июн 2011.
- ^ «Наполеоновский» развод««. В архиве из оригинала 21 января 2018 г.. Получено 20 января 2018.
- ^ «catholictextbookproject.com». Архивировано из оригинал 21 мая 2018 г.. Получено 20 мая 2018.
- ^ Южное обозрение, Том 9. 1871.
- ^ Конфиденциальная переписка императора Наполеона и императрицы Жозефины: включая письма с момента их свадьбы до смерти Жозефины, а также несколько частных писем императора его брату Джозефу и другим важным лицам. С многочисленными пояснительными примечаниями … Братья Мейсон. 1856 г.
Александр, Цезарь, Карл Великий, и я основал империи. Но на чем мы основывали творения нашего гения? По силе. Иисус Христос основал свою империю на любви; и в этот час миллионы людей умрут за него
- ^ Cyclopdia of Moral and Religious Anecdote [сокращенная из более крупной «Cyclopdia» К. Арвина], со вступительным эссе преподобного Джорджа Чивера. Дж. Дж. Гриффин и компания. 1851. с. 58.
- ^ Уильям Робертс, «Наполеон, Конкордат 1801 года и его последствия». в Фрэнке Дж. Коппе, изд., Спорные конкордаты: отношения Ватикана с Наполеоном, Муссолини и Гитлером (1999) стр. 34–80.
- ^ Найджел Астон, Религия и революция во Франции 1780–1804 гг. (Католический университет Америки Press, 2000) с. 279–315
- ^ Найджел Астон, Христианство и революционная Европа, 1750–1830 гг. (Издательство Кембриджского университета, 2002) С. 261–62.
- ^ Луис Гранадос (2012). Проклятая хорошая компания. Гуманистическая пресса. С. 182–83. ISBN 978-0931779244. В архиве из оригинала от 22 сентября 2015 г.
- ^ а б «Когда Наполеон захватил папу». Нью-Йорк Таймс. 13 декабря 1981 г. В архиве из оригинала 21 января 2018 г.. Получено 30 января 2018.
- ^ «Наполеон и папа: от конкордата до отлучения». В архиве из оригинала 24 января 2018 г.. Получено 23 января 2018.
- ^ «Архивная копия». В архиве из оригинала 21 января 2018 г.. Получено 20 января 2018.CS1 maint: заархивированная копия как заголовок (ссылка на сайт)
- ^ «Пий VII | папа». В архиве из оригинала 2 мая 2016 г.. Получено 6 мая 2017.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 436
- ^ а б Грин, Дэвид Б. (9 февраля 2014 г.). «Этот день в еврейской истории / Парижский синедрион созывается по велению Наполеона». Гаарец. В архиве с оригинала на 1 декабря 2017 г.. Получено 21 ноября 2017.
- ^ Schwarzfuchs 1979, стр. 50
- ^ Кронин 1994, стр. 315
- ^ «Наполеон Бонапарт». Несколько известных масонов. Великая Ложа Британской Колумбии и Юкона A.F. & A.M.. Получено 9 июн 2020.
- ^ Питер Гейл, Наполеон, за и против (1982)
- ^ Джордж Ф. Э. Руде (1988). Французская революция. Grove Weidenfeld. п. 128. ISBN 978-0-8021-3272-7. В архиве из оригинала 26 сентября 2015 г.
- ^ Джек Коггинс (1966). Солдаты и воины: иллюстрированная история. Courier Dover Publications. п. 187. ISBN 978-0-486-45257-9.
- ^ Салли Уоллер (2002). Франция в период революции, 1776–1830 гг.. Heinemann. п. 188. ISBN 978-0-435-32732-3.
- ^ См. Дэвид Чендлер, «Общее введение» к его Походы Наполеона: разум и методы величайшего солдата истории (1975).
- ^ Робертс, Наполеон: Жизнь (2014) стр. 470–73
- ^ Грегори Р. Копли (2007). Искусство победы: стратегии личного успеха и глобального выживания в меняющемся мире. Саймон и Шустер. п. 97. ISBN 978-1-4165-2478-6.
- ^ Дуайер 2013, стр. 175–76
- ^ Эллис, Джеффри (16 мая 2003 г.). Наполеоновская империя. Международное высшее образование Macmillan. п. 125. ISBN 978-1-4039-4401-6.
- ^ Дж. М. Томпсон, Наполеон Бонапарт: его взлеты и падения (1954), стр. 285
- ^ Кристофер Хибберт (1999). Веллингтон: личная история. Da Capo Press. п. 171. ISBN 978-0-7382-0148-1.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 357
- ^ Стивен Инглунд, Наполеон: политическая жизнь (2004), стр. 379ff
- ^ ван Кревальд, Мартин (1987). Командование на войне. Массачусетс: Издательство Гарвардского университета. п. 64. ISBN 978-0-674-14441-5.
- ^ «Наполеон Бонапарт (персонаж)». База данных фильмов в Интернете. Архивировано из оригинал 18 ноября 2017 г.. Получено 22 августа 2020.
- ^ Белл 2007, п. 13
- ^ «Самые популярные фильмы и сериалы о Наполеоне Бонапарте». База данных фильмов в Интернете. Получено 22 августа 2020.
- ^ The Fortnightly, Volume 114. Chapman and Hall, 1923. p. 836.
- ^ Луи Антуан Фовеле де Бурриен. «Воспоминания Наполеона Бонапарта». Сыновья Чарльза Скрибнера, 1889. Vol. 1, стр. 7.
- ^ Кирчайзен, Ф. Наполеон Нью-Йорк: Харкорт, Брейс, 1932 г.
- ^ Давыдов, Денис. На службе у царя против Наполеона: Воспоминания Дениса Давыдова, 1806–1814 гг.. Перевод Григория Трубецкого. Гринхилл Букс, 1999. стр. 64.
- ^ «Величайший карикатурный переворот всех времен: британец, убедивший всех, что Наполеон невысокого роста». Национальная почта. 28 апреля 2016 г.. Получено 30 сентября 2017.
- ^ Робертс 2004, стр. 93
- ^ а б c Оуэн Коннелли (2006). Неудача к славе: военные кампании Наполеона. Роуман и Литтлфилд. п. 7. ISBN 978-0742553187.
- ^ «Миф о высоте Наполеона: как одно изображение может изменить историю». сущность. 13 февраля 2017. В архиве из оригинала 5 января 2018 г.. Получено 4 января 2018.
- ^ Сьюард, Десмонд. Семья Наполеона. Нью-Йорк: Викинг, 1986.
- ^ Книжник, Vol. 29, стр. 304. Дневник капитана Росса, командующего Нортумберлендом.
- ^ Бордес 2007, п. 118.
- ^ Холл 2006, стр. 181
- ^ а б McGraw-Hill’s, История США, 2012 г., стр. 112–13[требуется разъяснение ]
- ^ Blaufarb 2007, стр. 101–02
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 255
- ^ Бернард Шварц (1998). Кодекс Наполеона и мир общего права. Обмен юридической книги. п. 7. ISBN 978-1-886363-59-5. В архиве из оригинала от 23 сентября 2015 г.
- ^ Дерево 2007, стр. 55
- ^ Шек 2008, Глава: Дорога к национальному объединению
- ^ Астарита 2005, стр. 264
- ^ Alter 2006, стр. 61–76.
- ^ Эндрю Робертс, Наполеон: Жизнь (2014) стр. xxxiii
- ^ Роберт Р. Палмер и Джоэл Колтон, История современного мира (Нью-Йорк: McGraw Hill, 1995), стр. 428–29.
- ^ а б Арчер и др. 2002, стр. 397
- ^ Флинн 2001, стр. 16
- ^ МакКонахи, Брюс (2001). «Корни артиллерийской доктрины: пересмотр наполеоновской артиллерийской тактики» (PDF). Журнал военной истории. 65 (3): 617–640. Дои:10.2307/2677528. JSTOR 2677528. В архиве (PDF) из оригинала от 19 января 2012 г.
- ^ Арчер и др. 2002, стр. 383
- ^ Джон Шай, «Джомини» в Питере Парете, изд. Создатели современной стратегии: от Макиавелли до ядерного века (1986).
- ^ Арчер и др. 2002, стр. 380
- ^ Робертс 2001, стр. 272
- ^ Арчер и др. 2002, стр. 404
- ^ Хэллок, Уильям; Уэйд, Герберт Т (1906). «Очертания эволюции мер и весов и метрической системы». Лондон: Компания Macmillan. С. 66–69.
- ^ Дени Феврие. «Un Historique du Mètre» (На французском). Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Industrie. Архивировано из оригинал 28 февраля 2011 г.. Получено 10 марта 2011.
- ^ Тьерри Сабо (1 октября 2000 г.). «Les poids et mesures sous l’Ancien Régime» [Веса и меры Ancien Régime] (на французском языке). история-генеалогия. Архивировано из оригинал 5 декабря 2010 г.. Получено 10 февраля 2011.
- ^ О’Коннор 2003
- ^ Клайв Эмсли (2014). Наполеон: завоевание, реформа и реорганизация. Рутледж. п. 52. ISBN 978-1317610281. В архиве из оригинала 18 октября 2015 г.
- ^ а б Уильямс, Л. Пирс (1956). «Наука, образование и Наполеон I». Исида. 47 (4): 369–382. Дои:10.1086/348507. JSTOR 226629. S2CID 144112149.
- ^ Маргарет Брэдли, «Научное образование против военной подготовки: влияние Наполеона Бонапарта на Политехническую школу». Анналы науки (1975) 32 № 5 с. 415–49.
- ^ Робертс 2014, стр. 278–81
- ^ Гастингс, Макс (31 октября 2014 г.). «Все должно славе». Журнал «Уолл Стрит. Архивировано из оригинал 13 ноября 2014 г.
- ^ Чарльз Эсдейл, Наполеоновские войны: международная история 1803–1815 гг. (2008), стр. 39
- ^ Колин С. Грей (2007). Война, мир и международные отношения: введение в стратегическую историю. Рутледж. п. 47. ISBN 978-1-134-16951-1. В архиве из оригинала от 20 марта 2015 г.
- ^ Эбботт 2005, стр. 3
- ^ а б Маклинн 1998, п. 666
- ^ Репа, янв (2 декабря 2005 г.). «Фурор над аустерлицкой церемонией». BBC. В архиве из оригинала 20 апреля 2010 г.. Получено 5 апреля 2010.
- ^ Poulos 2000
- ^ Гейл 1947
- ^ Филип Дуайер, «Вспоминание и забвение в современной Франции: Наполеон, рабство и французские исторические войны», Французская политика, культура и общество (2008) 26 # 3. С. 110–22. онлайн
- ^ Чендлер 1973, стр. xliii
- ^ Хэнсон 2003
- ^ Cronin 1994, стр. 342–43.
- ^ Коррелли Барнетт, Бонапарт (1978)
- ^ Жан Тулар, Наполеон: миф о спасителе (1984)
- ^ Бержерон, Луи (1981). Франция под Наполеоном. Princeton U.P. ISBN 978-0691007892.
- ^ Доминик Ливен, «Обзорная статья: Россия и поражение Наполеона». Критика: Исследования в истории России и Евразии (2006) 7 # 2 стр. 283–308.
- ^ Роберт С. Александр, Наполеон (Oxford University Press, 2001) исследует основные дискуссии историков.
- ^ E.A. Арнольд, «Наполеоновская историография английского языка, 1973–1998: мысли и соображения». Слушания — Западное общество французской истории, Vol. 26 (2000). С. 283–94.
- ^ Джон Данн, «Недавняя наполеоновская историография:« Бедные отношения »приносят пользу?» Французская история (2004) 18 № 4 с. 484–91.
- ^ Алан Форрест, «Пропаганда и легитимация власти в наполеоновской Франции». Французская история, 2004 18(4): 426–45
- ^ Юбер Н. Б. Ричардсон, Словарь Наполеона и его времен (1921) онлайн бесплатно С. 101–06.
- ^ Марк, Брайант, «Бродсайд против Бони». История сегодня 60.1 (2010): 52+
- ^ Марк Брайант, Наполеоновские войны в мультфильмах (Улица Граб, 2009).
- ^ а б Судхир Хазаризингх, «Память и политическое воображение: пересмотренная легенда о Наполеоне». Французская история, 2004 18(4): 463–83
- ^ а б Венита Датта, «L’appel Au Soldat»: видения наполеоновских легенд в популярной культуре Belle Epoque ». Французские исторические исследования 2005 28(1): 1–30
- ^ «Призыв к докладам: Международное наполеоновское общество, Четвертый Международный наполеоновский конгресс». La Fondation Napoléon. Архивировано из оригинал 8 января 2009 г.. Получено 27 июн 2008.
- ^ Лоран, Оттави (8 февраля 2012 г.). «Новая наполеоновская кампания за Монтро». Основание Наполеона. Архивировано из оригинал 29 сентября 2013 г.
- ^ Захват 2003, анализ по странам
- ^ Лазарь Волин (1970) Век русского сельского хозяйства. От Александра II до Хрущева, с. 25. Издательство Гарвардского университета
- ^ «Кодекс Наполеона». Британская энциклопедия. В архиве из оригинала 29 декабря 2011 г.. Получено 13 апреля 2012.
- ^ Лобингье, Чарльз Самнер (декабрь 1918 г.). «Наполеон и его кодекс». Гарвардский юридический обзор. 32 (2): 114–134. Дои:10.2307/1327640. ISSN 0017-811X. JSTOR 1327640.
- ^ Анджей Ньювазны, «Наполеон и польская идентичность». История сегодня, Май 1998 г., т. 48 нет. 5 с. 50–55
- ^ С.Ю. Рычков «Непобедимый Наполеон — память участника Бородинского сражения, императора Наполеона I в названиях кораблей. К 200-летию со дня смерти императора французов. Научный отчет. // Источники. Памятники. Проблемы. Материалы XXIV Международной научной конференции, 7–9 сентября 2020 г. Бородино.
- ^ «Биография Жозефины Богарне». Архивировано из оригинал 28 октября 2018 г.. Получено 27 октября 2018.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 117
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 271
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 118
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 284
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 188
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 100
- ^ а б Маклинн 1998, п. 663
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 630
- ^ Люкотт, Жерар; Macé, Jacques & Hrechdakian, Peter (сентябрь 2013 г.). «Реконструкция гаплотипа хромосомы линии Y Наполеона Первого» (PDF). Международный журнал наук. 2 (9): 127–39. ISSN 2305-3925. В архиве (PDF) из оригинала от 6 апреля 2014 г.
- ^ Маклинн 1998, п. 423
использованная литература
Биографические этюды
- Эбботт, Джон (2005). Жизнь Наполеона Бонапарта. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4179-7063-6.
- Белл, Дэвид А. (2015). Наполеон: краткая биография. Оксфорд и Нью-Йорк: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-026271-6. только 140pp; ученым
- Блауфарб, Рэйф (2007). Наполеон: символ века, краткая история с документами. Бедфорд. ISBN 978-0-312-43110-5.
- Чендлер, Дэвид (2002). Наполеон. Лео Купер. ISBN 978-0-85052-750-6.
- Кронин, Винсент (1994). Наполеон. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-00-637521-0.
- Двайер, Филип (2008). Наполеон: путь к власти. Издательство Йельского университета. КАК В B00280LN5G.
- Двайер, Филип (2013). Гражданин император: Наполеон у власти. Издательство Йельского университета. КАК В B00GGSG3W4.
- Инглунд, Стивен (2010). Наполеон: политическая жизнь. Скрибнер. ISBN 978-0-674-01803-7.
- Гениффи, Патрис. Бонапарт: 1769–1802 гг. (Гарвардский университет, 2015 г., французское издание 2013 г.); 1008 с .; том 1 наиболее полной новейшей научной биографии ведущего французского специалиста; меньше внимания к сражениям и кампаниям выдержка; также онлайн-обзор
- Джонсон, Пол (2002). Наполеон: жизнь. Книги пингвинов. ISBN 978-0-670-03078-1.; 200 стр .; довольно враждебно
- Лефевр, Жорж (1969). Наполеон из 18 брюмера в Тильзит, 1799–1807 гг.. Издательство Колумбийского университета. влиятельная обширная история
- Лефевр, Жорж (1969). Наполеон: от Тильзита до Ватерлоо, 1807–1815 гг.. Издательство Колумбийского университета.
- Лион, Мартин (1994). Наполеон Бонапарт и наследие Французской революции. Пресса Святого Мартина.
- Маркхэм, Феликс (1963). Наполеон. Наставник.; 303 с .; краткая биография оксфордского ученого онлайн
- Маклинн, Фрэнк (1998). Наполеон. Пимлико. ISBN 978-0-7126-6247-5. КАК В 0712662472.
- Робертс, Эндрю (2014). Наполеон: Жизнь. Группа пингвинов. ISBN 978-0-670-02532-9.
- Томпсон, Дж. М. (1951). Наполеон Бонапарт: его взлеты и падения. Oxford U.P., 412 с .; Оксфордским ученым
Основные источники
- Бродли А. М. и Дж. Холланд Роуз. Наполеон в карикатуре 1795-1821 (Джон Лейн, 1911) онлайн, иллюстрированный
- Гурго, Гаспар (1903) [1899]. Беседы Наполеона на острове Святой Елены. Перевод с французского Элизабет Уормели Латимер. Чикаго: A.C. McClurg.
Специальности
- Алдер, Кен (2002). Мера всего — семилетняя одиссея и скрытая ошибка, изменившие мир. Свободная пресса. ISBN 978-0-7432-1675-3.
- Альтер, Питер (2006). Т. К. У. Бланнинг и Хаген Шульце (ред.). Единство и разнообразие в европейской культуре c. 1800. Издательство Оксфордского университета. ISBN 978-0-19-726382-2.
- Амини, Ирадж (2000). Наполеон и Персия. Тейлор и Фрэнсис. ISBN 978-0-934211-58-1.
- Арчер, Кристон I .; Феррис, Джон Р .; Хервиг, Хольгер Х. (2002). Всемирная история войны. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-4423-8.
- Астарита, Томмазо (2005). Между соленой и святой водой: история южной Италии. W.W. Нортон и компания. ISBN 978-0-393-05864-2.
- Белл, Дэвид (2007). Первая тотальная война. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 978-0-618-34965-4.
- Бордес, Филипп (2007). Жак-Луи Давид. Издательство Йельского университета. ISBN 978-0-300-12346-3.
- Брукс, Ричард (2000). Атлас мировой военной истории. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-7607-2025-7.
- Чендлер, Дэвид (1966). Походы Наполеона. Нью-Йорк: Скрибнер. ISBN 978-0025236608. OCLC 740560411.
- Чендлер, Дэвид (1973) [1966]. Походы Наполеона.
- Чесни, Чарльз (2006). Лекции Ватерлоо: исследование кампании 1815 года. Kessinger Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4286-4988-0.
- Клаузевиц, Карл фон (2018). Итальянская кампания Наполеона 1796 года. Пер и под ред. Николас Мюррей и Кристофер Прингл. Лоуренс, Канзас: Университетское издательство Канзаса. ISBN 978-0-7006-2676-2
- Коннелли, Оуэн (2006). Неудача к славе: военные кампании Наполеона. Роуман и Литтлфилд. ISBN 978-0-7425-5318-7.
- Соответственно, Дэвид (2004). Билли Раффиан: Беллерофонт и падение Наполеона. Блумсбери. ISBN 978-1-58234-468-3.
- Каллен, Уильям (2008). Является ли мышьяк афродизиаком?. Королевское химическое общество. ISBN 978-0-85404-363-7.
- Дрискель, Пол (1993). Как и положено легенде. Kent State University Press. ISBN 978-0-87338-484-1.
- Флинн, Джордж К. (2001). Призыв и демократия: призыв во Франции, Великобритании и США. Издательская группа «Гринвуд». ISBN 978-0-313-31912-9.
- Фремонт-Барнс, Грегори; Фишер, Тодд (2004). Наполеоновские войны: расцвет и падение империи. Скопа. ISBN 978-1-84176-831-1.
- Фулгум, Нил (2007). «Посмертная маска Наполеона». Университет Северной Каролины. Архивировано из оригинал 26 июля 2013 г.. Получено 4 августа 2008.
- Гейтс, Дэвид (2001). Испанская язва: история войны на полуострове. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-81083-1.
- Гейтс, Дэвид (2003). Наполеоновские войны 1803–1815 гг.. Пимлико. ISBN 978-0-7126-0719-3.
- Годешо, Жак; и другие. (1971). Наполеоновская эпоха в Европе. Холт, Райнхарт и Уинстон. ISBN 9780030841668.
- Грабь, Александр (2003). Наполеон и преобразование Европы. Макмиллан. ISBN 978-0-333-68275-3.
- Холл, Стивен (2006). Размер имеет значение. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. п.181. ISBN 978-0-618-47040-2.
- Харви, Роберт (2006). Война войн. Робинсон. ISBN 978-1-84529-635-3.
- Хиндмарш, Дж. Томас; Сладкий, Джон (2008). «Смерть Наполеона, рака или мышьяка?». Клиническая химия. 54 (12): 2092. Дои:10.1373 / Clinchem.2008.117358. Архивировано из оригинал 26 декабря 2010 г.. Получено 10 октября 2010.
- Карш, Инари (2001). Империи песка: борьба за господство на Ближнем Востоке, 1789–1923 гг.. Издательство Гарвардского университета. ISBN 978-0-674-00541-9.
- Моват, Р. Б. (1924) Дипломатия Наполеона (1924) 350 с. онлайн
- О’Коннор, Дж; Робертсон, Е. Ф. (2003). «История измерений». Андреевский университет. Получено 18 июля 2008.
- Поулос, Анти (2000). «Гаагская конвенция 1954 года о защите культурных ценностей в случае вооруженного конфликта». Международный журнал правовой информации (том 28 изд.). 28: 1–44. Дои:10.1017 / S0731126500008842.
- Ричардсон, Хьюберт Н. Словарь Наполеона и его времен (1921) онлайн бесплатно 489pp
- Робертс, Крис (2004). Легко брошенные тяжелые слова. Гранта. ISBN 978-1-86207-765-2.
- Шом, Алан (1997). Наполеон Бонапарт. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-017214-5.
- Шредер, Пол В. (1996). Трансформация европейской политики 1763–1848 гг.. Oxford U.P. С. 177–560. ISBN 978-0-19-820654-5. передовая дипломатическая история Наполеона и его эпохи
- Шварцфухс, Саймон (1979). Наполеон, евреи и синедрион. Рутледж. ISBN 978-0-19-710023-3.
- Уотсон, Уильям (2003). Триколор и полумесяц. Издательская группа «Гринвуд». ISBN 978-0-275-97470-1. Получено 12 июн 2009.
- Болезненный, Мартин (2001). Исламский мир в упадке: от Карловицкого договора до распада Османской империи. Гринвуд. п. 99. ISBN 978-0275968915.
- Уэллс, Дэвид (1992). Словарь любопытной и интересной геометрии Penguin. Книги пингвинов. ISBN 978-0-14-011813-1.
Историография и память
- Бродли, Александр Мейрик (1911). Наполеон в карикатуре 1795-1821. Джон Лейн, 1911 Карикатура.
- Двайер, Филип Г. (2004). «Наполеон Бонапарт как герой и спаситель: образ, риторика и поведение в построении легенды». Французская история. 18 (4): 379–403. Дои:10.1093 / fh / 18.4.379.
- Двайер, Филип (2008). «Вспоминание и забвение в современной Франции: Наполеон, рабство и французские исторические войны». Французская политика, культура и общество. 26 (3): 110–22. Дои:10.3167 / фшт.2008.260306.
- Инглунд, Стивен. «Наполеон и Гитлер». Журнал исторического общества (2006) 6 № 1 с. 151–69.
- Гейл, Питер (1982) [1947]. Наполеон за и против. Книги пингвинов.
- Хэнсон, Виктор Дэвис (2003). «Институт Клермонта: Маленький тиран, обзор Наполеон: Жизнь пингвина«. Институт Клермонта.
- Хазаризингх, Судхир (2005). Легенда о Наполеоне. отрывок и текстовый поиск
- Хазаризингх, Судхир. «Память и политическое воображение: возвращение к легенде о Наполеоне», Французская история (2004) 18 № 4 с. 463–83.
- Хазаризингх, Судхир (2005). «Наполеоновская память во Франции девятнадцатого века: создание либеральной легенды». МЛН. 120 (4): 747–73. Дои:10,1353 / млн. 2005,0119. S2CID 154508777.
внешние ссылки
- Наполеоновский гид
- Наполеон серии
- Международное наполеоновское общество
- биография США Служба общественного вещания
- Работы Наполеона в Проект Гутенберг
- Газетные вырезки о Наполеоне в Архив прессы ХХ века из ZBW
- «Наполеон Бонапарт и шахматы» Эдварда Винтера
Наполеон I Франции Дом Бонапарта Родился: 15 августа 1769 г. Умер: 5 мая 1821 г. |
||
Политические офисы | ||
---|---|---|
Новое название
Директория распущена |
Временный консул Французской Республики 11 ноября — 12 декабря 1799 г. Подается вместе с: Роджер Дюко и Эммануэль Жозеф Сийес |
Стал Первый консул |
Новое название
Консульство создано |
Первый консул Французской Республики 12 декабря 1799 г. — 18 мая 1804 г. Подается вместе с: Жан Жак Режи де Камбасерес (Второй консул) Шарль-Франсуа Лебрен (Третий консул) |
Стал Император |
Новое название
Итальянская Республика создана |
Президент Итальянской Республики 26 января 1802 — 17 марта 1805 |
Вакантный
(Стало король ) Следующий титул принадлежит Энрико Де Никола |
Новое название
Гельветическая республика распалась |
Посредник Швейцарской Конфедерации 19 февраля 1803 — 19 октября 1813 г. |
Создана новая Конфедерация |
Королевские титулы | ||
Вакантный
французская революция Титул последний раз принадлежал Людовик XVI |
Император французов 18 мая 1804 г. — 11 апреля 1814 г. |
Преемник Людовик XVIII как король Франции и Наварры |
Вакантный
Титул последний раз принадлежал Карл V, император Священной Римской империи |
Король Италии 17 марта 1805 — 11 апреля 1814 |
Вакантный
Следующий титул принадлежит Виктор Эммануил II Савойский |
Вакантный
Титул последний раз принадлежал Людовик XVI |
Соправитель Андорры 1806-11 апреля 1814 г. |
Преемник Людовик XVIII |
Новое название
Государство создано |
Защитник Конфедерации Рейна 12 июля 1806-19 октября 1813 г. |
Конфедерация распалась
последовательный правитель: |
Новое название | Повелитель Остров Эльба 11 апреля 1814 — 20 марта 1815 |
Отказ от титула |
Предшествует Людовик XVIII как король Франции и Наварры |
Император французов Соправитель Андорры 20 марта — 22 июня 1815 г. |
Преемник Людовик XVIII как король Франции и Наварры (Наполеон IIтолько по его воле) |
Названия под предлогом | ||
Новое название | — ТИТУЛЯРНЫЙ — Император французов 11 апреля 1814 — 20 марта 1815 |
Вакантный
Следующий титул принадлежит Наполеон II |
Наполеон Бонапарт — биография
Первый император Франции и один из самых талантливых полководцев – это Наполеон Бонапарт. Его отличал высокий интеллект, поразительная память и невероятная работоспособность. Он сам разрабатывал стратегию и тактику военных действий, поэтому практически во всех сражениях одерживал победу. Он был очень амбициозен и это качество помогло ему очень быстро сделать карьеру. Генеральские погоны он примерил в 24 года, а в 34 провозгласил себя императором.
Кроме этого Наполеон обладал и необычными способностями. Скорость чтения у него была невероятной – до двух тысяч слов за минуту. Он мог долго обходиться без сна, довольствуясь 2-3 часами передышки в сутки. Личность императора вызывает интерес и до сегодняшнего дня, его феномен до конца не изучен.
Детство и юность
Родился Наполеон Бонапарт 15 августа 1769 года в городе Аяччо, на Корсике, в семье мелких аристократов. Отца звали Карло ди Буонапарте, он служил в должности судебного заседателя, и зарабатывал в год 22,5 тысячи франков. Мама Летиция Рамолино занималась домом и детьми. Она была очень красивой и женственной, но отличалась мужественным и твердым характером, и полным отсутствием образования. Ее отец был губернатором города Аяччо, и выделил ей в качестве приданого 175 тысяч франков. Летиция родила 12 детей, но выжили только восемь. Родители Наполеона были корсиканцами по национальности.
В ранние годы мальчика часто мучил сухой кашель, который мог вызывать туберкулез. Наполеон читал запоем, особенно ему нравилась историческая литература. Он практически не вылезал с третьего этажа, где проводил много времени в небольшой комнате с книгой в руках. Ему так нравилось это занятие, что часто он даже не спускался к обеду или ужину.
Первое образование мальчик получил дома. Он изучал священную историю и грамоту, а когда ему исполнилось 6, стал учеником частной школы. В десять лет Наполеон уже был учеником Отенского колледжа, но учился там совсем мало. Далее дорога привела его в военное училище города Бриенн. После его окончания в 1784-м Бонапарт становится курсантом Парижской военной академии. Он вышел оттуда лейтенантом и в 1785 году попал на службу в артиллерию.
В годы юности он предпочитал уединение, по-прежнему много читал и изучал военное дело.
В 1788-м, когда он был на Корсике, непосредственно разрабатывал оборонительные сооружения, составил доклад по организации ополченческой армии. В это время он сам пробует писать, и даже решил прославиться в этом направлении.
Наполеон продолжает много читать, особенно интересуется историей, географией, изучает размеры доходов стран Европы. Его привлекают идеи Жан-Жака Руссо. Бонапарт стал автором истории Корсики, его перу принадлежат произведения «Замаскированный пророк», «Беседа о любви», «Граф Эссекс». Помимо этого он записывает в дневник все свои мысли и наблюдения.
Из всех сочинений Наполеона издалось только одно, все остальные так и остались рукописями. В его трудах явно просвечивается неприязнь к Франции, и нежные чувства к родной Корсике. Повести Наполеона того времени имеют революционную подоплеку и политический подтекст.
Бонапарт с большим энтузиазмом отреагировал на Французскую революцию. В 1792-м он становится членом клуба Якобинцев. Когда в 1793-м французы разбили англичан и взяли город Тулон, ему присваивают звание бригадный генерал. Это событие полностью изменило биографию Наполеона, и стало началом блестящей военной карьеры.
В октябре 1795-го Бонапарт принял самое активное участие в противостоянии с роялистами, которые организовали мятеж. Бонапарт против них использовал пушки. За это его произвели в дивизионные генералы, и назначили командовать тыловыми войсками. Карьера Наполеона складывалась очень удачно. После его выпуска из военной школы в Париже в 1785-м прошло всего 10 лет — за столь короткий промежуток времени он сумел пройти все ступени тогдашнего чинопроизводства, и получить генеральский титул. На тот момент ему исполнилось всего 24 года.
В 1796 году Наполеон Бонапарт выступил против австрийцев, оккупировавших Италию. В 1797 году так называемый итальянский поход успешно завершился, а Наполеон прослыл великим полководцем. С 1798 по 1799-й Бонапарт находился в Сирии и Египте, куда отправился по приказу Директории.
Эта военная экспедиция была провальной, однако Наполеону поражение не поставили в вину. Он собирается вступить в бой с русской армией, которой командовал Суворов. В 1799-м Наполеон вернулся в Париж и застал кризис режима Директории.
Внутренняя политика
В 1802 году во Франции произошел переворот, было провозглашено консульство, а сам Наполеон стал консулом. В 1804 году Бонапарт провозгласил себя императором. Он стал активным участником разработки нового Гражданского кодекса, основанного на Римском праве.
В то же время он ведет собственную внутреннюю политику, способствующую укреплению его власти. Наполеон считает, что только таким образом можно сохранить то, что завоевано в результате революции. Далее император принялся реформировать право и администрирование, изменив правовую и административную сферы. Некоторые из этих изменений используются и до настоящего времени для нормального функционирования государственного строя. Бонапарт полностью аннулировал анархию. Издал закон, который защищал право на владение собственностью. Всех граждан Франции он наделил одинаковыми правами и возможностями.
В каждом городе и деревне появился мэр, по указанию императора учредили Французский банк. Экономика начала выходить из упадочного состояния, и это стало поводом для оптимизма даже самых бедных французов. Начался бум образования, один за одним стали открываться учебные заведения – лицеи. Значительно расширилась полицейская сеть, оживилась работа тайного отдела, а вот прессу начали давить еще больше. Жесткая цензура не пропускала нежелательных публикаций. Шаг за шагом Франция продвигалась в сторону создания монархии.
В те же годы власти Франции сумели заключить соглашение с Папой Римским, по которому власть Наполеона признавалась единственно законной. Но взамен церковь потребовала возвести католицизм до господствующего уровня, и сделать его главной верой для жителей Франции. Однако не все приветствовали нововведения Бонапарта с воодушевлением, нашлись те, которые считали его предателем революции. Но Наполеон был твердо уверен, что он продолжает идеи революционного движения.
Внешняя политика
Наполеон стал императором в годы ведения Францией военных действий против Англии и Австрии. После победоносного итальянского похода границы Франции уже были надежно закрыты для вторжения. В результате победы Наполеона, ему подчинились практически все государства Европы. Территории, которые не были присоединены к Франции, стали ее колониями. Бонапарт назначил их правителями членов своей семьи. Пруссии, России и Австрии пришлось заключать союз.
В самом начале правления Бонапарта, народ принял его с воодушевлением, его считали национальным героем, спасителем нации. Он был предметом гордости, страна жила в едином национальном подъеме. Однако вскоре все устали от войны, которая длилась два десятка лет. После провозглашения Наполеоном Континентальной блокады, экономика Англии пришла в полный упадок, легкая промышленность почти не работала, страна перестала торговать с другими европейскими странами. В результате возникшего кризиса первыми пострадали французские портовые города, колониальные товары не поставлялись, а европейские государства уже не могли обойтись без них. Что говорить о простых людях, если даже при дворе французского императора не хватало сахара, кофе, чая.
Ситуация стала еще более острой, когда грянул экономический кризис 1810-го. Буржуа отказывались давать деньги на войну, потому что считали, что военной угрозы нет. Они прекрасно понимали, что таким образом император стремится расширить собственное влияние и защитить интересы династии.
В 1812-м, после разгрома наполеоновских войск российской армией, некогда сильная и непобедимая империя начала разрушаться. А в 1814-м, когда Австрия, Россия, Швеция и Пруссия вошли в антифранцузскую коалицию, империя рухнула. Это был полный разгром французов, с взятием их столицы – Парижа.
Наполеон Бонапарт отрекся от престола, однако сохранил императорский статус. Он оказался в ссылке на острове Эльба, расположенном в Средиземном море, но его заточение было не долгим.
Жители Франции начали выражать недовольство сложившимся положением, они боялись, что к власти снова придут Бурбоны и вельможи. Наполеону удалось сбежать из заточения, и 1 марта 1815-го он прибыл в столицу, где горожане приветствовали его со всеми почестями. Бонапарт снова начал войну, и этот отрезок его правления получил название «100 дней». Разгром наполеоновских войск случился в июне того же, 1815-го, когда было проиграно сражение под Ватерлоо.
Наполеона свергли, он оказался в плену у англичан, которые не стали долго церемониться и отправили его в ссылку. Теперь местом его заточения стал остров святой Елены в Атлантическом океане.
Там он находился на протяжении шести лет. Отношение к Бонапарту было неоднозначным, некоторые англичане люто ненавидели французского императора, некоторые наоборот, пытались привлечь к нему внимание. Английский поэт Джордж Байрон так проникся судьбой Наполеона, что в 1815-м написал пять стихотворений, вошедших в «Наполеоновский цикл». Поэту немедленно предъявили обвинение в не патриотичности. Еще одним ярым поклонником Бонапарта, была и принцесса Шарлотта, отцом которой был будущий Георг IV. В свое время Наполеон очень надеялся на ее поддержку, но его надежды были напрасными – Шарлотта умерла при родах в 1817-м.
Личная жизнь
Кроме выдающихся талантов и способностей Наполеона, он характеризовался и повышенной влюбчивостью. Все почему-то считают, что он был маленького роста, но в то время его 168 см были очень даже приличными показателями. Он был выше среднего роста, и поэтому не остался без внимания самых красивых женщин страны. Наполеон обладал мужественным лицом, хорошей военной выправкой, которую можно рассмотреть на дошедших до нашего времени снимках и картинах. Это вызывало большой интерес, и привлекало повышенное внимание дам.
Первый раз Наполеон серьезно влюбился в девушку по имени Дезире-Евгения-Клара, которой было всего 16. Он даже предложил ей руку и сердце. Однако в то время его дела стремительно шли вверх, карьера складывалась просто головокружительно, и он предпочел заводить отношения с парижанками. В Париже Бонапарт уже не смотрит на молоденьких девушек, ему больше нравятся женщины постарше.
Личная жизнь будущего императора изменилась в 1796-м, когда он встретил Жозефину Богарне. В этом же году состоялась их свадьба. Ее отцом был плантатор с острова Мартиника в Карибском море, а сама женщина была старше Наполеона на шесть лет. В шестнадцать лет ее выдали замуж за виконта Александра Богарне, и в этом браке у нее родились двое ребятишек. Через 6 лет Жозефина добилась развода с мужем, немного прожила в Париже, потом переехала к отцу. В 1789-м, после того, как случилась революция, она снова вернулась в Париж. Жила женщина на средства бывшего мужа, карьера которого сложилась достаточно успешно. Но в 1794-м он был казнен, и Жозефине тоже пришлось узнать, что такое тюремное заключение.
Спустя год Жозефине удалось выйти на свободу, и она встретила тогда еще не очень известного Наполеона. Некоторые источники утверждают, что она в то время была любовницей Барраса, правителя страны.
С его легкой руки состоялось знакомство Жозефины и Бонапарта, которое закончилось бракосочетанием. А сам Баррас присутствовал на торжестве в качестве свидетеля и вскоре сделал Наполеона командующим Итальянской армией тыла.
У новобрачных было очень много общего. Они были родом с маленьких островов, знали, как иногда нелегко добывается кусок хлеба, за плечами у обоих был тюремный срок. А еще они оба любили предаваться мечтам. После свадебных торжеств Бонапарт вскоре отбыл в расположение армии, а супруга осталась в столице Франции. После завершения итальянской кампании Наполеона отправили в Египет, а его жена даже не думала сопровождать мужа, ей пришлась по душе светская жизнь Парижа.
Наполеон ревновал жену, и чтобы не оставаться одиноким, начал встречаться с другими женщинами. Потом исследователи посчитали, что число его фавориток колеблется в пределах 20-50 человек. Иногда эти романтические отношения заканчивались рождением детей, которые считались незаконнорожденными наследниками. До наших дней дошли имена двоих – Александра Колонна-Валевского и Шарля Леоне. Александр сумел обзавестись продолжателями рода, поэтому их династия существует и сейчас. Сына Александра родила Наполеону Мария Валевская, отец которой был польским аристократом.
Потом оказалось, что Жозефина не сможет родить ребенка Наполеону, и он принял решение развестись с ней. Бракоразводный процесс состоялся в 1810 году. Французский император решил сделать предложение Анне Павловне, сестре русского императора Александра I, однако тот ему отказал. Причиной было то, что Бонапарт не принадлежал к королевскому семейству, а родился в семье простого дворянина. Этот отказ негативно сказался на отношениях двух стран.
Вскоре Наполеон повел под венец Марию-Луизу, дочь австрийского императора. В 1811-м у них родился наследник, и даже после этого общественность Франции этот брак не одобрила.
Судьба сыграла с Наполеоном злую шутку – внук его бывшей супруги Жозефины занял французский престол, обойдя наследника самого Бонапарта. Ее потомки заняли царственное положение не только во Франции, им покорилась Бельгия, Дания, Норвегия, Люксембург, Швеция. А вот Наполеону с наследниками не повезло, его сын умер в молодом возрасте и не оставил после себя потомков.
После того, как он оказался в ссылке на Эльбе, Наполеон думал, что Мария-Луиза последует за ним, но она приняла решение уехать к отцу. Ее место заняла Валевская, прибывшая на остров вместе с сыном Александром. После возвращения в Париж, император отправил множество писем супруге в Австрию, но ни на одно из них она не ответила.
Смерть
После разгромного сражения под Ватерлоо, Наполеон снова попал в ссылку. На этот раз его приютом стал остров св.Елены. У него обнаружилась неизлечимая болезнь, доставлявшая ему массу страданий. Наполеона не стало 5 мая 1821 года, он скончался на 52-м году жизни.
Существует мнение, что император умер от онкологии, а согласно второму утверждению, причиной его смерти стал мышьяк, которым его травили длительное время. Те, которым ближе первая версия, считают, что рак был связан с наследственностью Бонапарта, потому что у его отца тоже была онкология. По мнению других, следует обратить внимание на тот факт, что перед смертью император сильно поправился, и это свидетельствует в пользу версии отравления, потому что рак наоборот, вызывает худобу. После исследования волос Наполеона, в них обнаружилась высокая концентрация мышьяка.
Бонапарт завещал похоронить его во Франции, и в 1840-м его последнюю волю исполнили. Его останки покоятся в Доме инвалидов в Париже. Гробница императора окружена скульптурами, автором которых был Жан Жак Прадье.
Память
Подвиги первого французского императора воспевали многие литераторы, причем не только Франции, но и других стран. Его биография легла в основу картин, причем первые сняты еще в формате немого кино. Его имя присвоено деревьям, которые растут в Африке, каждый из нас наверное хоть раз в жизни ел торт «Наполеон». Письма Бонапарта стали всеобщим достоянием с легкой руки Наполеона III, с тех пор их используют в качестве цитат.
Ссылки
- Страница в Википедии
Для нас важна актуальность и достоверность информации. Если вы обнаружили ошибку или неточность, пожалуйста, сообщите нам. Выделите ошибку и нажмите сочетание клавиш Ctrl+Enter.
НАПОЛЕО́Н I Бонапарт (Napoleon I Bonaparte, Buonaparte) (15 августа 1769, Аяччо — 5 мая 1821, остров Святой Елены), французский государственный деятель, полководец, император в 1804—1814 и в марте — июне 1815. Начал службу в войсках в 1785 в чине младшего лейтенанта артиллерии; выдвинулся в период Великой французской революции (см. ВЕЛИКАЯ ФРАНЦУЗСКАЯ РЕВОЛЮЦИЯ). В ноябре 1799 совершил государственный переворот (18 брюмера), в результате которого стал первым консулом, фактически сосредоточившим в своих руках с течением времени всю полноту власти; в 1804 провозглашен императором. Провел ряд реформ (принятие гражданского кодекса, 1804; основание Французского банка, 1800). Благодаря победоносным войнам значительно расширил территорию империи, поставил в зависимость от Франции большинство государств Западной и Центральной Европы. Поражение наполеоновских войск в войне 1812 против России положило начало крушению империи Наполеона I. Вступление в 1814 войск антифранцузской коалиции в Париж вынудило Наполеона I отречься от престола. Был сослан на остров Эльба. Вновь занял французский престол в марте 1815 (смотри «Сто дней» (см. СТО ДНЕЙ)). После поражения при Ватерлоо вторично отрекся от престола (22 июня 1815). Последние годы жизни провел на острове Святой Елены пленником англичан.
Молодость Наполеона
Происходил из небогатой корсиканской дворянской семьи Шарля и Летиции Буонапарте (всего в семье было 5 сыновей и 3 дочери). Учился в королевской военной школе в Бриенне и в Парижской военной школе (1779—1785), которую окончил в чине лейтенанта. Публицистические произведения Наполеона периода Революции («Диалог о любви»,«Dialogue sur l»amour», 1791, «Ужин в Бокэре», «Le Souper de Beaucaire», 1793) говорят о том, что он разделял тогда якобинские настроения. Назначенный начальником артиллерии в армию, осаждавшую занятый англичанами Тулон, Бонапарт осуществил блестящую военную операцию. Тулон был взят, а сам он получил в 24 года звание бригадного генерала (1793). После термидорианского переворота (см. ТЕРМИДОРИАНСКИЙ ПЕРЕВОРОТ) Бонапарт отличился при разгоне роялистского мятежа в Париже (1795), а затем получил назначение командующим Итальянской армией. В итальянском походе (1796—97) во всем блеске проявился полководческий гений Наполеона. Австрийский генералитет ничего не смог противопоставить молниеносным маневрам французской армии, нищей, плохо экипированной, но воодушевленной революционными идеями и предводительствуемой Бонапартом. Она одерживала одну победу за другой: Монтенотто, Лоди, Милан, Кастильоне, Арколе, Риволи. Итальянцы восторженно встречали армию, несущую идеалы свободы, равенства, избавлявшую от австрийского владычества. Австрия потеряла все свои земли в Северной Италии, где была создана союзная с Францией Цизальпинская республика (см. ЦИЗАЛЬПИНСКАЯ РЕСПУБЛИКА). Имя Бонапарта гремело по всей Европе. После первых же побед Наполеон стал претендовать на самостоятельную роль. Правительство Директории (см. ДИРЕКТОРИЯ (во Франции)) не без удовольствия отослало его в египетскую экспедицию (1798—1799). Идея ее была связана со стремлением французской буржуазии конкурировать с английской, активно утверждавшей свое влияние в Азии и в Северной Африке. Однако закрепиться здесь не удалось: воюя с турками, французская армия не нашла поддержки у местного населения.
Приход к власти
Кризис власти в Париже тем временем достиг своего апогея. Коррумпированная Директория была не способна обеспечить завоевания Революции. В Италии русско-австрийские войска под командованием А. В. Суворова (см. СУВОРОВ Александр Васильевич) ликвидировали все приобретения Наполеона и даже возникла угроза вторжения во Францию. В этих условиях возвратившийся популярный генерал, опираясь на верную ему армию, разогнал представительные органы и Директорию и провозгласил режим консульства (9 ноября 1799). Согласно новой конституции, законодательная власть делилась между Государственным Советом, Трибунатом, Законодательным корпусом и Сенатом, что делало ее беспомощной и неповоротливой. Исполнительная власть, напротив, собиралась в один кулак первого консула, т. е. Бонапарта. Второй и третий консулы имели лишь совещательные голоса. Конституция была одобрена народом на плебисците (около 3 миллионов голосов против 1,5 тысяч) (1800). Позже Наполеон провел через сенат декрет о пожизненности своих полномочий (1802), а затем провозгласил себя императором французов (1804).
В момент прихода Наполеона к власти Франция находилась в состоянии войны с Австрией и Англией. Новый итальянский поход Бонапарта напоминал первый. Перейдя через Альпы, французская армия неожиданно появилась в Северной Италии, восторженно встречаемая местным населением. Решающей стала победа в битве при Маренго (1801). Угроза французским границам была ликвидирована.
Внутренняя политика Наполеона
Состояла в укреплении его личной власти как гарантии сохранения результатов революции: гражданских прав, прав собственности на землю крестьян, а также тех, кто купил во время революции национальные имущества, т. е. конфискованные земли эмигрантов и церкви. Обеспечить все эти завоевания должен был Гражданский кодекс (1804), вошедший в историю как кодекс Наполеона (см. НАПОЛЕОНА КОДЕКС). Наполеон провел административную реформу, учредив институт подотчетных правительству префектов департаментов и супрефектов округов (1800). В города и деревни назначались мэры. Был учрежден государственный Французский банк для хранения золотого запаса и эмиссии бумажных денег (1800), нейтрализована система сбора налогов. Административные и правовые нововведения Наполеона заложили основу современного государства, многие из них действуют и по сей день. Именно тогда была создана система средних школ — лицеев и высшие учебные заведения — Нормальная и Политехническая школы, до сих пор остающиеся самыми престижными во Франции. Прекрасно сознавая важность воздействия на общественное мнение, Наполеон закрыл 160 из 173 парижских газет, а остальные поставил под контроль правительства. Была создана мощная полиция и разветвленная тайная служба. Наполеон заключил конкордат (см. КОНКОРДАТ) с папой Римским (1801). Рим признавал новую французскую власть, а католицизм объявлялся религией большинства французов. При этом свобода вероисповедания сохранялась. Назначение епископов и деятельность церкви ставились в зависимость от правительства.
Экономическая политика, войны и континентальная блокада
Экономическая политика состояла в обеспечении первенства французской промышленной и финансовой буржуазии на европейском рынке. Этому мешал английский капитал, преобладание которого обусловливалось уже происшедшей в Англии индустриальной революцией. Англия одну за другой сколачивала коалиции против Франции, стараясь привлечь на свою сторону крупнейшие европейские державы — в первую очередь Австрию и Россию. Она финансировала ведение военных действий на континенте. Наполеон планировал непосредственную высадку на британские острова, но на море Англия была сильнее (при Трафальгаре (см. ТРАФАЛЬГАРСКОЕ СРАЖЕНИЕ) французский флот был уничтожен английским, которым командовал адмирал Нельсон (1805). Однако месяц спустя под Аустерлицем (ныне Славков, Чехия) Наполеон нанес сокрушительный удар объединенным австрийским и русским войскам. Испугавшись роста влияния Франции, против нее выступила Пруссия, но была быстро побеждена (битва при Иене, 1806), французские войска вошли в Берлин. Русские войска нанесли большой урон французской армии в битве при Эйлау (1807), но потерпели поражение при Фридланде (1807). В результате войны в состав Франции вошли территории Бельгии, Голландии, северной Германии, части Италии. На остальной части Италии, в центре Европы, в Испании (1809) были созданы зависимые от Наполеона королевства, где правили члены его семьи. Территориально чрезвычайно урезанные Пруссия и Австрия были вынуждены заключить с Францией союз. Это сделала также и Россия (Тильзитский мир (см. ТИЛЬЗИТСКИЙ МИР), 1807).
Одержав победу, Наполеон подписал декрет о континентальной блокаде (см. КОНТИНЕНТАЛЬНАЯ БЛОКАДА) (1806). Отныне Франция и все ее союзники прекращали торговые сношения с Англией. Европа была основным рынком сбыта английских товаров, а также колониальных, ввозимых в основном Англией, крупнейшей морской державой. Континентальная блокада нанесла ущерб английской экономике: спустя год с небольшим Англия переживала кризис в производстве шерсти, текстильной промышленности; произошло падение фунта стерлингов. Однако блокада ударила и по континенту. Французская промышленность не в состоянии была заменить на европейском рынке английскую. Нарушение торговых связей с английскими колониями привело в упадок и французские портовые города: Ла-Рошель, Марсель и др. Население страдало от недостатка привычных колониальных товаров: кофе, сахара, чая…
Кризис и падение Империи
Политика Наполеона в первые годы его правления пользовалась поддержкой населения — не только собственников, но и малоимущих (рабочих, батраков). Дело в том, что оживление в экономике вызвало рост зарплаты, чему способствовали и постоянные наборы в армию. Наполеон выглядел спасителем отечества, войны вызывали национальный подъем, а победы — чувство гордости. Ведь Наполеон Бонапарт был человеком революции, а окружающие его маршалы, блестящие военачальники, происходили подчас из самых низов. Но постепенно народ начинал уставать от войны, длившейся уже около 20 лет. Наборы в армию стали вызывать недовольство. К тому же вновь разразился экономический кризис (1810). Буржуазия же сознавала, что экономически подчинить всю Европу ей не под силу. Войны на просторах Европы теряли для нее смысл, затраты на них стали раздражать. Безопасности Франции давно ничто не угрожало, а во внешней политике все большую роль играло стремление императора распространить свою власть, обеспечить интересы династии. Во имя этих интересов Наполеон развелся с первой женой Жозефиной (см. ЖОЗЕФИНА), от которой не имел детей, и женился на дочери австрийского императора Марии-Луизе (1810). Наследник родился (1811), но австрийский брак императора был крайне непопулярен во Франции.
Союзники Наполеона, принявшие континентальную блокаду вопреки своим интересам, не стремились строго ее соблюдать. Росла напряженность между ними и Францией. Все более очевидными становились противоречия между Францией и Россией. Патриотические движения ширились в Германии, в Испании не угасала герилья (см. ГЕРИЛЬЯ). Разорвав отношения с Александром I (см. АЛЕКСАНДР I Павлович), Наполеон решился на вторжение в Россию. Отечественная война 1812 (см. ОТЕЧЕСТВЕННАЯ ВОЙНА 1812 года) стала началом конца Империи. Огромная разноплеменная армия Наполеона не несла в себе прежнего революционного духа, вдали от родины на полях России она быстро таяла и, наконец, перестала существовать. По мере движения русской армии на запад антинаполеоновская коалиция росла. Против наспех собранной новой французской армии в «битве народов» под Лейпцигом выступили русские, австрийские, прусские и шведские войска (16—19 октября 1813). Наполеон потерпел поражение и после вступления союзников в Париж отрекся от престола. Он получил во владение маленький островок Эльба в Средиземном море (1814).
В обозе иноземных войск во Францию вернулись Бурбоны и эмигранты, предвкушавшие возврат своих имуществ и привилегий. Это вызвало недовольство и страх во французском обществе и в армии. Воспользовавшись этим, Наполеон бежал с Эльбы и, встречаемый восторженными криками толпы, возвратился в Париж. Война возобновилась, но Франция уже не в силах была нести ее бремя. «Сто дней» завершились окончательным поражением Наполеона около бельгийской деревни Ватерлоо (18 июня 1815). Он стал пленником англичан и был отправлен на далекий островок Святой Елены в Атлантическом океане. Там Наполеон провел последние шесть лет жизни, угасая от тяжелой болезни и мелочных издевательств своих тюремщиков.
Наполеон обладал феноменальной памятью и работоспособностью, острым умом, военным и государственным гением, даром дипломата, артиста, обаянием, позволявшим ему легко располагать к себе людей. Этот человек в неизменном сером сюртуке и треуголке занял прочное место в истории, дав свое имя целой эпохе. Империя Наполеона оказалась непрочной. Однако трагическая судьба императора глубоко потрясла его современников, в том числе художников, музыкантов, поэтов, дала обильную пищу романтизму, расцветшему в европейской культуре последующих десятилетий. Сражения Наполеона вошли в военные учебники. «Наполеоновское право» лежит в основе гражданских норм западных демократий. Реставрированная монархия Бурбонов не смогла уничтожить закрепленные Наполеоном результаты Революции.