H. P. Lovecraft |
|
---|---|
Lovecraft in 1934 |
|
Born | Howard Phillips Lovecraft August 20, 1890 Providence, Rhode Island, U.S. |
Died | March 15, 1937 (aged 46) Providence, Rhode Island, U.S. |
Resting place | Swan Point Cemetery, Providence 41°51′14″N 71°22′52″W / 41.854021°N 71.381068°W |
Pen name |
|
Occupation |
|
Genre | Lovecraftian horror, weird fiction, horror fiction, science fiction, gothic fiction, fantasy |
Literary movement |
|
Years active | 1917–1937 |
Notable works |
|
Spouse |
Sonia Greene (m. ) |
Signature | |
Howard Phillips Lovecraft (; August 20, 1890 – March 15, 1937) was an American writer of weird, science, fantasy, and horror fiction. He is best known for his creation of the Cthulhu Mythos.[a]
Born in Providence, Rhode Island, Lovecraft spent most of his life in New England. After his father’s institutionalization in 1893, he lived affluently until his family’s wealth dissipated after the death of his grandfather. Lovecraft then lived with his mother, in reduced financial security, until her institutionalization in 1919. He began to write essays for the United Amateur Press Association, and in 1913 wrote a critical letter to a pulp magazine that ultimately led to his involvement in pulp fiction. He became active in the speculative fiction community and was published in several pulp magazines. Lovecraft moved to New York City, marrying Sonia Greene in 1924, and later became the center of a wider group of authors known as the «Lovecraft Circle». They introduced him to Weird Tales, which would become his most prominent publisher. Lovecraft’s time in New York took a toll on his mental state and financial conditions. He returned to Providence in 1926 and produced some of his most popular works, including The Call of Cthulhu, At the Mountains of Madness, The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time. He would remain active as a writer for 11 years until his death from intestinal cancer at the age of 46.
Lovecraft’s literary corpus is based around the idea of cosmicism, which was simultaneously his personal philosophy and the main theme of his fiction. Cosmicism posits that humanity is an insignificant part of the cosmos, and could be swept away at any moment. He incorporated fantasy and science fiction elements into his stories, representing the perceived fragility of anthropocentrism. This was tied to his ambivalent views on knowledge. His works were largely set in a fictionalized version of New England. Civilizational decline also plays a major role in his works, as he believed that the West was in decline during his lifetime. Lovecraft’s early political opinions were conservative and traditionalist; additionally, he held a number of racist views for much of his adult life. Following the Great Depression, Lovecraft became a socialist, no longer believing a just aristocracy would make the world more fair.
Throughout his adult life, Lovecraft was never able to support himself from earnings as an author and editor. He was virtually unknown during his lifetime and was almost exclusively published in pulp magazines before his death. A scholarly revival of Lovecraft’s work began in the 1970s, and he is now regarded as one of the most significant 20th-century authors of supernatural horror fiction. Many direct adaptations and spiritual successors followed. Works inspired by Lovecraft, adaptations or original works, began to form the basis of the Cthulhu Mythos, which utilizes Lovecraft’s characters, setting, and themes.
Biography
Early life and family tragedies
Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892
Lovecraft was born in his family home on August 20, 1890, in Providence, Rhode Island. He was the only child of Winfield Scott Lovecraft and Sarah Susan (née Phillips) Lovecraft.[2] Susie’s family was of substantial means at the time of their marriage, as her father, Whipple Van Buren Phillips, was involved in business ventures.[3] In April 1893, after a psychotic episode in a Chicago hotel, Winfield was committed to Butler Hospital in Providence. His medical records state that he had been «doing and saying strange things at times» for a year before his commitment.[4] The person who reported these symptoms is unknown.[5] Winfield spent five years in Butler before dying in 1898. His death certificate listed the cause of death as general paresis, a term synonymous with late-stage syphilis.[6] Throughout his life, Lovecraft maintained that his father fell into a paralytic state, due to insomnia and overwork, and remained that way until his death. It is not known whether Lovecraft was simply kept ignorant of his father’s illness or whether his later statements were intentionally misleading.[7]
After his father’s institutionalization, Lovecraft resided in the family home with his mother, his maternal aunts Lillian and Annie, and his maternal grandparents Whipple and Robie.[8] According to family friends, his mother, known as Susie, doted on the young Lovecraft excessively, pampering him and never letting him out of her sight.[9] Lovecraft later recollected that his mother was «permanently stricken with grief» after his father’s illness. Whipple became a father figure to Lovecraft in this time, Lovecraft noting that his grandfather became the «centre of my entire universe». Whipple, who often traveled to manage his business, maintained correspondence by letter with the young Lovecraft who, by the age of three, was already proficient at reading and writing.[10]
Whipple encouraged the young Lovecraft to have an appreciation of literature, especially classical literature and English poetry. In his old age, he helped raise the young H. P. Lovecraft and educated him not only in the classics, but also in original weird tales of «winged horrors» and «deep, low, moaning sounds» which he created for his grandchild’s entertainment. The original sources of Phillips’ weird tales are unidentified. Lovecraft himself guessed that they originated from Gothic novelists like Ann Radcliffe, Matthew Lewis, and Charles Maturin.[11] It was during this period that Lovecraft was introduced to some of his earliest literary influences, such as The Rime of the Ancient Mariner illustrated by Gustave Doré, One Thousand and One Nights, Thomas Bulfinch’s Age of Fable, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses.[12]
While there is no indication that Lovecraft was particularly close to his grandmother Robie, her death in 1896 had a profound effect on him. By his own account, it sent his family into «a gloom from which it never fully recovered». His mother and aunts wore black mourning dresses that «terrified» him. This is also the time that Lovecraft, approximately five-and-a-half years old, started having nightmares that later would inform his fictional writings. Specifically, he began to have recurring nightmares of beings he referred to as «night-gaunts». He credited their appearance to the influence of Doré’s illustrations, which would «whirl me through space at a sickening rate of speed, the while fretting & impelling me with their detestable tridents.» Thirty years later, night-gaunts would appear in Lovecraft’s fiction.[13]
Lovecraft’s earliest known literary works were written at the age of seven, and were poems restyling the Odyssey and other Greco-Roman mythological stories.[14] Lovecraft would later write that during his childhood he was fixated on the Greco-Roman pantheon, and briefly accepted them as genuine expressions of divinity, foregoing his Christian upbringing.[15] He recalled, at five years old, being told Santa Claus did not exist and retorted by asking why «God is not equally a myth?»[16] At the age of eight, he took a keen interest in the sciences, particularly astronomy and chemistry. He also examined the anatomical books that were held in the family library, which taught him the specifics of human reproduction that were not yet explained to him. As a result, he found that it «virtually killed my interest in the subject.»[17]
In 1902, according to Lovecraft’s later correspondence, astronomy became a guiding influence on his worldview. He began publishing the periodical Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy, using the hectograph printing method.[18] Lovecraft went in and out of elementary school repeatedly, oftentimes with home tutors making up for the lost years, missing time due to health concerns that have not been determined. The written recollections of his peers described him as withdrawn but welcoming to those who shared his then-current fascination with astronomy, inviting them to look through his prized telescope.[19]
Education and financial decline
By 1900, Whipple’s various business concerns were suffering a downturn, which resulted in the slow erosion of his family’s wealth. He was forced to let his family’s hired servants go, leaving Lovecraft, Whipple, and Susie, being the only unmarried sister, alone in the family home.[20] In the spring of 1904, Whipple’s largest business venture suffered a catastrophic failure. Within months, he died at age 70 due to a stroke. After Whipple’s death, Susie was unable to financially support the upkeep of the expansive family home on what remained of the Phillips’ estate. Later that year, she was forced to move to a small duplex with her son.[21]
Whipple Van Buren Phillips
Lovecraft called this time one of the darkest of his life, remarking in a 1934 letter that he saw no point in living anymore; he considered the possibility of committing suicide. His scientific curiosity and desire to know more about the world prevented him from doing so.[22] In fall 1904, he entered high school. Much like his earlier school years, Lovecraft was periodically removed from school for long periods for what he termed «near breakdowns». He did say, though, that while having some conflicts with teachers, he enjoyed high school, becoming close with a small circle of friends. Lovecraft also performed well academically, excelling in particular at chemistry and physics.[23] Aside from a pause in 1904, he also resumed publishing the Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy as well as starting the Scientific Gazette, which dealt mostly with chemistry.[24] It was also during this period that Lovecraft produced the first of the fictional works that he would later be known for, namely «The Beast in the Cave» and «The Alchemist».[25]
It was in 1908, prior to what would have been his high school graduation, that Lovecraft suffered another unidentified health crisis, though this instance was more severe than his prior illnesses.[26] The exact circumstances and causes remain unknown. The only direct records are Lovecraft’s own correspondence wherein he retrospectively described it variously as a «nervous collapse» and «a sort of breakdown», in one letter blaming it on the stress of high school despite his enjoying it.[27] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, he notes, «I was and am prey to intense headaches, insomnia, and general nervous weakness which prevents my continuous application to any thing.»[26]
Though Lovecraft maintained that he was going to attend Brown University after high school, he never graduated and never attended school again. Whether Lovecraft suffered from a physical ailment, a mental one, or some combination thereof has never been determined. An account from a high school classmate described Lovecraft as exhibiting «terrible tics» and that at times «he’d be sitting in his seat and he’d suddenly up and jump». Harry Brobst, a psychology professor, examined the account and claimed that chorea minor was the probable cause of Lovecraft’s childhood symptoms, while noting that instances of chorea minor after adolescence are very rare.[27] In his letters, Lovecraft acknowledged that he suffered from bouts of chorea as a child.[28] Brobst further ventured that Lovecraft’s 1908 breakdown was attributed to a «hysteroid seizure», a term that has become synonymous with atypical depression.[29] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, Lovecraft stated that he «could hardly bear to see or speak to anyone, & liked to shut out the world by pulling down dark shades & using artificial light.»[30]
Earliest recognition
Few of Lovecraft and Susie’s activities between late 1908 and 1913 were recorded.[31] Lovecraft described the steady continuation of their financial decline highlighted by his uncle’s failed business that cost Susie a large portion of their already dwindling wealth.[32] One of Susie’s friends, Clara Hess, recalled a visit during which Susie spoke continuously about Lovecraft being «so hideous that he hid from everyone and did not like to walk upon the streets where people could gaze on him.» Despite Hess’ protests to the contrary, Susie maintained this stance.[33] For his part, Lovecraft said he found his mother to be «a positive marvel of consideration».[34] A next-door neighbor later pointed out that what others in the neighborhood often assumed were loud, nocturnal quarrels between mother and son, were actually recitations of Shakespeare, an activity that seemed to delight mother and son.[35]
During this period, Lovecraft revived his earlier scientific periodicals.[31] He endeavored to commit himself to the study of organic chemistry, Susie buying the expensive glass chemistry assemblage he wanted.[36] Lovecraft found his studies were stymied by the mathematics involved, which he found boring and would cause headaches that would incapacitate him for the remainder of the day.[37] Lovecraft’s first non-self-published poem appeared in a local newspaper in 1912. Called Providence in 2000 A.D., it envisioned a future where Americans of English descent were displaced by Irish, Italian, Portuguese, and Jewish immigrants.[38] In this period he also wrote racist poetry, including «New-England Fallen» and «On the Creation of Niggers», but there is no indication that either were published during his lifetime.[39]
In 1911, Lovecraft’s letters to editors began appearing in pulp and weird-fiction magazines, most notably Argosy.[40] A 1913 letter critical of Fred Jackson, one of Argosy’s more prominent writers, started Lovecraft down a path that would define the remainder of his career as a writer. In the following letters, Lovecraft described Jackson’s stories as being «trivial, effeminate, and, in places, coarse». Continuing, Lovecraft argued that Jackson’s characters exhibit the «delicate passions and emotions proper to negroes and anthropoid apes.»[41] This sparked a nearly year-long feud in the magazine’s letters section between the two writers and their respective supporters. Lovecraft’s most prominent opponent was John Russell, who often replied in verse, and to whom Lovecraft felt compelled to reply because he respected Russell’s writing skills.[42] The most immediate effect of this feud was the recognition garnered from Edward F. Daas, then head editor of the United Amateur Press Association (UAPA).[43] Daas invited Russell and Lovecraft to join the organization and both accepted, Lovecraft in April 1914.[44]
Rejuvenation and tragedy
With the advent of United I obtained a renewed will to live; a renewed sense of existence as other than a superfluous weight; and found a sphere in which I could feel that my efforts were not wholly futile. For the first time I could imagine that my clumsy gropings after art were a little more than faint cries lost in the unlistening void.
—Lovecraft in 1921.[45]
Lovecraft immersed himself in the world of amateur journalism for most of the following decade.[45] During this period, he advocated for amateurism’s superiority to commercialism.[46] Lovecraft defined commercialism as writing for what he considered low-brow publications for pay. This was contrasted with his view of «professional publication», which was what he called writing for what he considered respectable journals and publishers. He thought of amateur journalism as serving as practice for a professional career.[47]
Lovecraft was appointed chairman of the Department of Public Criticism of the UAPA in late 1914.[48] He used this position to advocate for what he saw as the superiority of archaic English language usage. Emblematic of the Anglophilic opinions he maintained throughout his life, he openly criticized other UAPA contributors for their «Americanisms» and «slang». Often, these criticisms were embedded in xenophobic and racist statements that the «national language» was being negatively changed by immigrants.[49] In mid-1915, Lovecraft was elected vice-president of the UAPA.[50] Two years later, he was elected president and appointed other board members who mostly shared his belief in the supremacy of British English over modern American English.[51] Another significant event of this time was the beginning of World War I. Lovecraft published multiple criticisms of the American government and public’s reluctance to join the war to protect England, which he viewed as America’s ancestral homeland.[52]
In 1916, Lovecraft published his first short story, «The Alchemist», in the main UAPA journal, which was a departure from his usual verse. Due to the encouragement of W. Paul Cook, another UAPA member and future lifelong friend, Lovecraft began writing and publishing more prose fiction.[53] Soon afterwards, he wrote «The Tomb» and «Dagon».[54] «The Tomb», by Lovecraft’s own admission, was greatly influenced by the style and structure of Edgar Allan Poe’s works.[55] Meanwhile, «Dagon» is considered Lovecraft’s first work that displays the concepts and themes that his writings would later become known for.[56] Lovecraft published another short story, «Beyond the Wall of Sleep» in 1919, which was his first science fiction story.[57]
Lovecraft’s term as president of the UAPA ended in 1918, and he returned to his former post as chairman of the Department of Public Criticism.[58] In 1917, as Lovecraft related to Kleiner, Lovecraft made an aborted attempt to enlist in the United States Army. Though he passed the physical exam,[59] he told Kleiner that his mother threatened to do anything, legal or otherwise, to prove that he was unfit for service.[60] After his failed attempt to serve in World War I, he attempted to enroll in the Rhode Island National Guard, but his mother used her family connections to prevent it.[61]
During the winter of 1918–1919, Susie, exhibiting the symptoms of a nervous breakdown, went to live with her elder sister, Lillian. The nature of Susie’s illness is unclear, as her medical papers were later destroyed in a fire at Butler Hospital.[62] Winfield Townley Scott, who was able to read the papers before the fire, described Susie as having suffered a psychological collapse.[62] Neighbour and friend Clara Hess, interviewed in 1948, recalled instances of Susie describing «weird and fantastic creatures that rushed out from behind buildings and from corners at dark.»[63] In the same account, Hess described a time when they crossed paths in downtown Providence and Susie was unaware of where she was.[63] In March 1919, she was committed to Butler Hospital, like her husband before her.[64] Lovecraft’s immediate reaction to Susie’s commitment was visceral, writing to Kleiner that «existence seems of little value», and that he wished «it might terminate».[65] During Susie’s time at Butler, Lovecraft periodically visited her and walked the large grounds with her.[66]
Late 1919 saw Lovecraft become more outgoing. After a period of isolation, he began joining friends in trips to writer gatherings; the first being a talk in Boston presented by Lord Dunsany, whom Lovecraft had recently discovered and idolized.[67] In early 1920, at an amateur writer convention, he met Frank Belknap Long, who would end up being Lovecraft’s most influential and closest confidant for the remainder of his life.[68] The influence of Dunsany is apparent in his 1919 output, which is part of what would be called Lovecraft’s Dream Cycle, including «The White Ship» and «The Doom That Came to Sarnath».[69] In early 1920, he wrote «The Cats of Ulthar» and «Celephaïs», which were also strongly influenced by Dunsany.[70]
It was later in 1920 that Lovecraft began publishing the earliest Cthulhu Mythos stories. The Cthulhu Mythos, a term coined by later authors, encompasses Lovecraft’s stories that share a commonality in the revelation of cosmic insignificance, initially realistic settings, and recurring entities and texts.[71] The prose poem «Nyarlathotep» and the short story «The Crawling Chaos», in collaboration with Winifred Virginia Jackson, were written in late 1920.[72] Following in early 1921 came «The Nameless City», the first story that falls definitively within the Cthulhu Mythos. In it is one of Lovecraft’s most enduring phrases, a couplet recited by Abdul Alhazred; «That is not dead which can eternal lie; And with strange aeons even death may die.»[73] In the same year, he also wrote «The Outsider», which has become one of Lovecraft’s most heavily analyzed, and differently interpreted, stories.[74] It has been variously interpreted as being autobiographical, an allegory of the psyche, a parody of the afterlife, a commentary on humanity’s place in the universe, and a critique of progress.[75]
On May 24, 1921, Susie died in Butler Hospital, due to complications from an operation on her gallbladder five days earlier.[76] Lovecraft’s initial reaction, expressed in a letter written nine days after Susie’s death, was a deep state of sadness that crippled him physically and emotionally. He again expressed a desire that his life might end.[77] Lovecraft’s later response was relief, as he had become able to live independently from his mother. His physical health also began to improve, although he was unaware of the exact cause.[78] Despite Lovecraft’s reaction, he continued to attend amateur journalist conventions. Lovecraft met his future wife, Sonia Greene, at one such convention in July.[79]
Marriage and New York
Lovecraft and Sonia Greene on July 5, 1921
Lovecraft’s aunts disapproved of his relationship with Sonia. Lovecraft and Greene married on March 3, 1924, and relocated to her Brooklyn apartment at 259 Parkside Avenue; she thought he needed to leave Providence to flourish and was willing to support him financially.[80] Greene, who had been married before, later said Lovecraft had performed satisfactorily as a lover, though she had to take the initiative in all aspects of the relationship. She attributed Lovecraft’s passive nature to a stultifying upbringing by his mother.[81] Lovecraft’s weight increased to 200 lb (91 kg) on his wife’s home cooking.[82]
He was enthralled by New York, and, in what was informally dubbed the Kalem Club, he acquired a group of encouraging intellectual and literary friends who urged him to submit stories to Weird Tales. Its editor, Edwin Baird, accepted many of Lovecraft’s stories for the ailing publication, including «Under the Pyramids», which was ghostwritten for Harry Houdini.[83] Established informally some years before Lovecraft arrived in New York, the core Kalem Club members were boys’ adventure novelist Henry Everett McNeil, the lawyer and anarchist writer James Ferdinand Morton Jr., and the poet Reinhardt Kleiner.[84]
On January 1, 1925, Sonia moved from Parkside to Cleveland in response to a job opportunity, and Lovecraft left for a small first-floor apartment on 169 Clinton Street «at the edge of Red Hook»—a location which came to discomfort him greatly.[85] Later that year, the Kalem Club’s four regular attendees were joined by Lovecraft along with his protégé Frank Belknap Long, bookseller George Willard Kirk, and Samuel Loveman.[86] Loveman was Jewish, but he and Lovecraft became close friends in spite of the latter’s antisemitic attitudes.[87] By the 1930s, writer and publisher Herman Charles Koenig would be one of the last to become involved with the Kalem Club.[88]
Not long after the marriage, Greene lost her business and her assets disappeared in a bank failure.[89] Lovecraft made efforts to support his wife through regular jobs, but his lack of previous work experience meant he lacked proven marketable skills.[90] The publisher of Weird Tales was attempting to make the loss-making magazine profitable and offered the job of editor to Lovecraft, who declined, citing his reluctance to relocate to Chicago on aesthetic grounds.[91] Baird was succeeded by Farnsworth Wright, whose writing Lovecraft had criticized. Lovecraft’s submissions were often rejected by Wright. This may have been partially due to censorship guidelines imposed in the aftermath of a Weird Tales story that hinted at necrophilia, although after Lovecraft’s death, Wright accepted many of the stories he had originally rejected.[92]
Sonia also became ill and immediately after recovering, relocated to Cincinnati, and then to Cleveland; her employment required constant travel.[93] Added to his feelings of failure in a city with a large immigrant population, Lovecraft’s single-room apartment was burgled, leaving him with only the clothes he was wearing.[94] In August 1925, he wrote «The Horror at Red Hook» and «He», in the latter of which the narrator says «My coming to New York had been a mistake; for whereas I had looked for poignant wonder and inspiration […] I had found instead only a sense of horror and oppression which threatened to master, paralyze, and annihilate me.»[95] This was an expression of his despair at being in New York.[96] It was at around this time he wrote the outline for «The Call of Cthulhu», with its theme of the insignificance of all humanity.[97] During this time, Lovecraft wrote «Supernatural Horror in Literature» on the eponymous subject. It later became one of the most influential essays on supernatural horror.[98] With a weekly allowance Greene sent, Lovecraft moved to a working-class area of Brooklyn Heights, where he resided in a tiny apartment. He had lost approximately 40 pounds (18 kg) of body weight by 1926, when he left for Providence.[99]
Return to Providence and death
Lovecraft’s final home, May 1933 until March 10, 1937
Back in Providence, Lovecraft lived with his aunts in a «spacious brown Victorian wooden house» at 10 Barnes Street until 1933.[100] He then moved to 66 Prospect Street, which would become his final home.[b][101] The period beginning after his return to Providence contains some of his most prominent works, including The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, «The Call of Cthulhu» and The Shadow over Innsmouth.[102] The former two stories are partially autobiographical, as scholars have argued that The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath is about Lovecraft’s return to Providence and The Case of Charles Dexter Ward is, in part, about the city itself.[103] The former story also represents a partial repudiation of Dunsany’s influence, as Lovecraft had decided that his style did not come to him naturally.[104] At this time, he frequently revised work for other authors and did a large amount of ghostwriting, including The Mound, «Winged Death», and «The Diary of Alonzo Typer». Client Harry Houdini was laudatory, and attempted to help Lovecraft by introducing him to the head of a newspaper syndicate. Plans for a further project were ended by Houdini’s death in 1926.[105] After returning, he also began to engage in antiquarian travels across the eastern seaboard during the summer months.[106] During the spring–summer of 1930, Lovecraft visited, among other locations, New York City, Brattleboro, Vermont, Wilbraham, Massachusetts, Charleston, South Carolina, and Quebec City.[c][108]
Later, in August, Robert E. Howard wrote a letter to Weird Tales praising a then-recent reprint of H. P. Lovecraft’s «The Rats in the Walls» and discussing some of the Gaelic references used within.[109] Editor Farnsworth Wright forwarded the letter to Lovecraft, who responded positively to Howard, and soon the two writers were engaged in a vigorous correspondence that would last for the rest of Howard’s life.[110] Howard quickly became a member of the Lovecraft Circle, a group of writers and friends all linked through Lovecraft’s voluminous correspondence, as he introduced his many like-minded friends to one another and encouraged them to share their stories, utilize each other’s fictional creations, and help each other succeed in the field of pulp fiction.[111]
Meanwhile, Lovecraft was increasingly producing work that brought him no remuneration.[112] Affecting a calm indifference to the reception of his works, Lovecraft was in reality extremely sensitive to criticism and easily precipitated into withdrawal. He was known to give up trying to sell a story after it had been once rejected.[113] Sometimes, as with The Shadow over Innsmouth, he wrote a story that might have been commercially viable but did not try to sell it. Lovecraft even ignored interested publishers. He failed to reply when one inquired about any novel Lovecraft might have ready: although he had completed such a work, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, it was never typed up.[114] A few years after Lovecraft had moved to Providence, he and his wife Sonia Greene, having lived separately for so long, agreed to an amicable divorce. Greene moved to California in 1933 and remarried in 1936, unaware that Lovecraft, despite his assurances to the contrary, had never officially signed the final decree.[115]
As a result of the Great Depression, he shifted towards socialism, decrying both his prior political beliefs and the rising tide of fascism.[116] He thought that socialism was a workable middle ground between what he saw as the destructive impulses of both the capitalists and the Marxists of his day. This was based in a general opposition to cultural upheaval, as well as support for an ordered society. Electorally, he supported Franklin D. Roosevelt, but he thought that the New Deal was not sufficiently leftist. Lovecraft’s support for it was based in his view that no other set of reforms were possible at that time.[117]
H. P. Lovecraft’s gravestone
In late 1936, he witnessed the publication of The Shadow over Innsmouth as a paperback book.[d] 400 copies were printed, and the work was advertised in Weird Tales and several fan magazines. However, Lovecraft was displeased, as this book was riddled with errors that required extensive editing. It sold slowly and only approximately 200 copies were bound. The remaining 200 copies were destroyed after the publisher went out of business for the next seven years. By this point, Lovecraft’s literary career was reaching its end. Shortly after having written his last original short story, «The Haunter of the Dark», he stated that the hostile reception of At the Mountains of Madness had done «more than anything to end my effective fictional career». His declining psychological and physical states made it impossible for him to continue writing fiction.[120]
On June 11, Robert E. Howard was informed that his chronically ill mother would not awaken from her coma. He walked out to his car and committed suicide with a pistol that he had stored there. His mother died shortly thereafter.[121] This deeply affected Lovecraft, who consoled Howard’s father through correspondence. Almost immediately after hearing about Howard’s death, Lovecraft wrote a brief memoir titled «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard», which he distributed to his correspondents.[122] Meanwhile, Lovecraft’s physical health was deteriorating. He was suffering from an affliction that he referred to as «grippe».[e][124]
Due to his fear of doctors, Lovecraft was not examined until a month before his death. After seeing a doctor, he was diagnosed with terminal cancer of the small intestine.[125] He remained hospitalized until he died. He lived in constant pain until his death on March 15, 1937, in Providence. In accordance with his lifelong scientific curiosity, he kept a diary of his illness until he was physically incapable of holding a pen.[126] Lovecraft was listed along with his parents on the Phillips family monument.[127] In 1977, fans erected a headstone in Swan Point Cemetery on which they inscribed his name, the dates of his birth and death, and the phrase «I AM PROVIDENCE»—a line from one of his personal letters.[128]
Personal views
Politics
H. P. Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman by Virgil Finlay
Lovecraft began his life as a Tory,[129] which was likely the result of his conservative upbringing. His family supported the Republican Party for the entirety of his life. While it is unclear how consistently he voted, he voted for Herbert Hoover in the 1928 presidential election.[130] Rhode Island as a whole remained politically conservative and Republican into the 1930s.[131] Lovecraft himself was an Anglophile who supported the British monarchy. He opposed democracy and thought that the United States should be governed by an aristocracy. This viewpoint emerged during his youth and lasted until the end of the 1920s.[132] During World War I, his Anglophilia caused him to strongly support the entente against the Central Powers. Many of his earlier poems were devoted to then-current political subjects, and he published several political essays in his amateur journal, The Conservative.[133] He was a teetotaler who supported the implementation of Prohibition, which was one of the few reforms that he supported during the early part of his life.[134] While remaining a teetotaller, he later became convinced that Prohibition was ineffectual in the 1930s.[135] His personal justification for his early political viewpoints was primarily based on tradition and aesthetics.[136]
As a result of the Great Depression, Lovecraft reexamined his political views.[137] Initially, he thought that affluent people would take on the characteristics of his ideal aristocracy and solve America’s problems. When this did not occur, he became a socialist. This shift was caused by his observation that the Depression was harming American society. It was also influenced by the increase in socialism’s political capital during the 1930s. One of the main points of Lovecraft’s socialism was its opposition to Soviet Marxism, as he thought that a Marxist revolution would bring about the destruction of American civilization. Lovecraft thought that an intellectual aristocracy needed to be formed to preserve America.[138] His ideal political system is outlined in his 1933 essay «Some Repetitions on the Times». Lovecraft used this essay to echo the political proposals that had been made over the course of the last few decades. In this essay, he advocates governmental control of resource distribution, fewer working hours and a higher wage, and unemployment insurance and old age pensions. He also outlines the need for an oligarchy of intellectuals. In his view, power must be restricted to those who are sufficiently intelligent and educated.[139] He frequently used the term «fascism» to describe this form of government, but, according to S. T. Joshi, it bears little resemblance to that ideology.[140]
Lovecraft had varied views on the political figures of his day. He was an ardent supporter of Franklin D. Roosevelt.[141] He saw that Roosevelt was trying to steer a middle course between the conservatives and the revolutionaries, which he approved of. While he thought that Roosevelt should have been enacting more progressive policies, he came to the conclusion that the New Deal was the only realistic option for reform. He thought that voting for his opponents on the political left would be a wasted effort.[142] Internationally, like many Americans, he initially expressed support for Adolf Hitler. More specifically, he thought that Hitler would preserve German culture. However, he thought that Hitler’s racial policies should be based on culture rather than descent. There is evidence that, at the end of his life, Lovecraft began to oppose Hitler. According to Harry K. Brobst, Lovecraft’s downstairs neighbor went to Germany and witnessed Jews being beaten. Lovecraft and his aunt were angered by this. His discussions of Hitler drop off after this point.[143]
Atheism
Lovecraft was an atheist. His viewpoints on religion are outlined in his 1922 essay «A Confession of Unfaith». In this essay, he describes his shift away from the Protestantism of his parents to the atheism of his adulthood. Lovecraft was raised by a conservative Protestant family. He was introduced to the Bible and the mythos of Saint Nicholas when he was two. He passively accepted both of them. Over the course of the next few years, he was introduced to Grimms’ Fairy Tales and One Thousand and One Nights, favoring the latter. In response, Lovecraft took on the identity of «Abdul Alhazred», a name he would later use for the author of the Necronomicon.[144] Lovecraft experienced a brief period as a Greco-Roman pagan shortly thereafter.[145] According to this account, his first moment of skepticism occurred before his fifth birthday, when he questioned if God is a myth after learning that Santa Claus is not real. In 1896, he was introduced to Greco-Roman myths and became «a genuine pagan».[15]
This came to an end in 1902, when Lovecraft was introduced to space. He later described this event as the most poignant in his life. In response to this discovery, Lovecraft took to studying astronomy and described his observations in the local newspaper.[146] Before his thirteenth birthday, he had become convinced of humanity’s impermanence. By the time he was seventeen, he had read detailed writings that agreed with his worldview. Lovecraft ceased writing positively about progress, instead developing his later cosmic philosophy. Despite his interests in science, he had an aversion to realistic literature, so he became interested in fantastical fiction. Lovecraft became pessimistic when he entered amateur journalism in 1914. The Great War seemed to confirm his viewpoints. He began to despise philosophical idealism. Lovecraft took to discussing and debating his pessimism with his peers, which allowed him to solidify his philosophy. His readings of Friedrich Nietzsche and H. L. Mencken, among other pessimistic writers, furthered this development. At the end of his essay, Lovecraft states that all he desired was oblivion. He was willing to cast aside any illusion that he may still have held.[147]
Race
Race is the most controversial aspect of Lovecraft’s legacy, expressed in many disparaging remarks against non-Anglo-Saxon races and cultures in his works. Scholars have argued that these racial attitudes were common in the American society of his day, particularly in New England.[148] As he grew older, his original racial worldview became a classism or elitism, which regarded the superior race to include all those self-ennobled through high culture. From the start, Lovecraft did not hold all white people in uniform high regard, but rather esteemed English people and those of English descent.[149] In his early published essays, private letters and personal utterances, he argued for a strong color line to preserve race and culture.[150] His arguments were supported using disparagements of various races in his journalism and letters, and allegorically in his fictional works that depict non-human races.[151] This is evident in his portrayal of the Deep Ones in The Shadow over Innsmouth. Their interbreeding with humanity is framed as being a type of miscegenation that corrupts both the town of Innsmouth and the protagonist.[152]
Initially, Lovecraft showed sympathy to minorities who adopted Western culture, even to the extent of marrying a Jewish woman he viewed as being «well assimilated».[153] By the 1930s, Lovecraft’s views on ethnicity and race had moderated.[154] He supported ethnicities’ preserving their native cultures; for example, he thought that «a real friend of civilisation wishes merely to make the Germans more German, the French more French, the Spaniards more Spanish, & so on.»[155] This represented a shift from his previous support for cultural assimilation. His shift was partially the result of his exposure to different cultures through his travels and circle. The former resulted in him writing positively about Québécois and First Nations cultural traditions in his travelogue of Quebec.[156] However, this did not represent a complete elimination of his racial prejudices.[157]
Influences
Lovecraft was influenced by Edgar Allan Poe and Lord Dunsany.
His interest in weird fiction began in his childhood when his grandfather, who preferred Gothic stories, would tell him stories of his own design.[12] Lovecraft’s childhood home on Angell Street had a large library that contained classical literature, scientific works, and early weird fiction. At the age of five, Lovecraft enjoyed reading One Thousand and One Nights, and was reading Nathaniel Hawthorne a year later.[158] He was also influenced by the travel literature of John Mandeville and Marco Polo.[159] This led to his discovery of gaps in then-contemporary science, which prevented Lovecraft from committing suicide in response to the death of his grandfather and his family’s declining financial situation during his adolescence.[159] These travelogues may have also had an influence on how Lovecraft’s later works describe their characters and locations. For example, there is a resemblance between the powers of the Tibetan enchanters in The Travels of Marco Polo and the powers unleashed on Sentinel Hill in «The Dunwich Horror».[159]
One of Lovecraft’s most significant literary influences was Edgar Allan Poe, whom he described as his «God of Fiction».[160] Poe’s fiction was introduced to Lovecraft when the latter was eight years old. His earlier works were significantly influenced by Poe’s prose and writing style.[161] He also made extensive use of Poe’s unity of effect in his fiction.[162] Furthermore, At the Mountains of Madness directly quotes Poe and was influenced by The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket.[163] One of the main themes of the two stories is to discuss the unreliable nature of language as a method of expressing meaning.[164] In 1919, Lovecraft’s discovery of the stories of Lord Dunsany moved his writing in a new direction, resulting in a series of fantasies. Throughout his life, Lovecraft referred to Dunsany as the author who had the greatest impact on his literary career. The initial result of this influence was the Dream Cycle, a series of fantasies that originally take place in prehistory, but later shift to a dreamworld setting.[165] By 1930, Lovecraft decided that he would no longer write Dunsanian fantasies, arguing that the style did not come naturally to him.[166] Additionally, he also read and cited Arthur Machen and Algernon Blackwood as influences in the 1920s.[167]
Aside from horror authors, Lovecraft was significantly influenced by the Decadents, the Puritans, and the Aesthetic movement.[168] In «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent», Barton Levi St. Armand, a professor emeritus of English and American studies at Brown University, has argued that these three influences combined to define Lovecraft as a writer.[169] He traces this influence to both Lovecraft’s stories and letters, noting that he actively cultivated the image of a New England gentleman in his letters.[168] Meanwhile, his influence from the Decadents and the Aesthetic Movement stems from his readings of Edgar Allan Poe. Lovecraft’s aesthetic worldview and fixation on decline stems from these readings. The idea of cosmic decline is described as having been Lovecraft’s response to both the Aesthetic Movement and the 19th century Decadents.[170] St. Armand describes it as being a combination of non-theological Puritan thought and the Decadent worldview.[171] This is used as a division in his stories, particularly in «The Horror at Red Hook», «Pickman’s Model», and «The Music of Erich Zann». The division between Puritanism and Decadence, St. Armand argues, represents a polarization between an artificial paradise and oneiriscopic visions of different worlds.[172]
A non-literary inspiration came from then-contemporary scientific advances in biology, astronomy, geology, and physics.[173] Lovecraft’s study of science contributed to his view of the human race as insignificant, powerless, and doomed in a materialistic and mechanistic universe.[174] Lovecraft was a keen amateur astronomer from his youth, often visiting the Ladd Observatory in Providence, and penning numerous astronomical articles for his personal journal and local newspapers.[175] Lovecraft’s materialist views led him to espouse his philosophical views through his fiction; these philosophical views came to be called cosmicism. Cosmicism took on a more pessimistic tone with his creation of what is now known as the Cthulhu Mythos, a fictional universe that contains alien deities and horrors. The term «Cthulhu Mythos» was likely coined by later writers after Lovecraft’s death.[1] In his letters, Lovecraft jokingly called his fictional mythology «Yog-Sothothery».[176]
Dreams had a major role in Lovecraft’s literary career.[177] In 1991, as a result of his rising place in American literature, it was popularly thought that Lovecraft extensively transcribed his dreams when writing fiction. However, the majority of his stories are not transcribed dreams. Instead, many of them are directly influenced by dreams and dreamlike phenomena. In his letters, Lovecraft frequently compared his characters to dreamers. They are described as being as helpless as a real dreamer who is experiencing a nightmare. His stories also have dreamlike qualities. The Randolph Carter stories deconstruct the division between dreams and reality. The dreamlands in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath are a shared dreamworld that can be accessed by a sensitive dreamer. Meanwhile, in «The Silver Key», Lovecraft mentions the concept of «inward dreams», which implies the existence of outward dreams. Burleson compares this deconstruction to Carl Jung’s argument that dreams are the source of archetypal myths. Lovecraft’s way of writing fiction required both a level of realism and dreamlike elements. Citing Jung, Burleson argues that a writer may create realism by being inspired by dreams.[178]
Themes
Now all my tales are based on the fundamental premise that common human laws and interests and emotions have no validity or significance in the vast cosmos-at-large. To me there is nothing but puerility in a tale in which the human form—and the local human passions and conditions and standards—are depicted as native to other worlds or other universes. To achieve the essence of real externality, whether of time or space or dimension, one must forget that such things as organic life, good and evil, love and hate, and all such local attributes of a negligible and temporary race called mankind, have any existence at all. Only the human scenes and characters must have human qualities. These must be handled with unsparing realism, (not catch-penny romanticism) but when we cross the line to the boundless and hideous unknown—the shadow-haunted Outside—we must remember to leave our humanity and terrestrialism at the threshold.
— H. P. Lovecraft, in note to the editor of Weird Tales, on resubmission of «The Call of Cthulhu»[179]
Cosmicism
The central theme of Lovecraft’s corpus is cosmicism. Cosmicism is a literary philosophy that argues that humanity is an insignificant force in the universe. Despite appearing pessimistic, Lovecraft thought of himself being as being a cosmic indifferentist, which is expressed in his fiction. In it, human beings are often subject to powerful beings and other cosmic forces, but these forces are not so much malevolent as they are indifferent toward humanity. He believed in a meaningless, mechanical, and uncaring universe that human beings could never fully understand. There is no allowance for beliefs that could not be supported scientifically.[180] Lovecraft first articulated this philosophy in 1921, but he did not fully incorporate it into his fiction until five years later. «Dagon», «Beyond the Wall of Sleep», and «The Temple» contain early depictions of this concept, but the majority of his early tales do not analyze the concept. «Nyarlathotep» interprets the collapse of human civilization as being a corollary to the collapse of the universe. «The Call of Cthulhu» represents an intensification of this theme. In it, Lovecraft introduces the idea of alien influences on humanity, which would come to dominate all subsequent works.[181] In these works, Lovecraft expresses cosmicism through the usage of confirmation rather than revelation. Lovecraftian protagonists do not learn that they are insignificant. Instead, they already know it and have it confirmed to them through an event.[182]
Knowledge
Lovecraft’s fiction reflects his own ambivalent views regarding the nature of knowledge.[183] This expresses itself in the concept of forbidden knowledge. In Lovecraft’s stories, happiness is only achievable through blissful ignorance. Trying to know things that are not meant to be known leads to harm and psychological danger. This concept intersects with several other ideas. This includes the idea that the visible reality is an illusion masking the horrific true reality. Similarly, there are also intersections with the concepts of ancient civilizations that exert a malign influence on humanity and the general philosophy of cosmicism.[184] According to Lovecraft, self-knowledge can bring ruin to those who seek it. Those seekers would become aware of their own insignificance in the wider cosmos and would be unable to bear the weight of this knowledge. Lovecraftian horror is not achieved through external phenomenon. Instead, it is reached through the internalized psychological impact that knowledge has on its protagonists. «The Call of Cthulhu», The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time feature protagonists who experience both external and internal horror through the acquisition of self-knowledge.[185] The Case of Charles Dexter Ward also reflects this. One of its central themes is the danger of knowing too much about one’s family history. Charles Dexter Ward, the protagonist, engages in historical and genealogical research that ultimately leads to both madness and his own self-destruction.[186]
Decline of civilization
For much of his life, Lovecraft was fixated on the concepts of decline and decadence. More specifically, he thought that the West was in a state of terminal decline.[187] Starting in the 1920s, Lovecraft became familiar with the work of the German conservative-revolutionary theorist Oswald Spengler, whose pessimistic thesis of the decadence of the modern West formed a crucial element in Lovecraft’s overall anti-modern worldview.[188] Spenglerian imagery of cyclical decay is a central theme in At the Mountains of Madness. S. T. Joshi, in H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West, places Spengler at the center of his discussion of Lovecraft’s political and philosophical ideas. According to him, the idea of decline is the single idea that permeates and connects his personal philosophy. The main Spenglerian influence on Lovecraft would be his view that politics, economics, science, and art are all interdependent aspects of civilization. This realization led him to shed his personal ignorance of then-current political and economic developments after 1927.[189] Lovecraft had developed his idea of Western decline independently, but Spengler gave it a clear framework.[190]
Science
Lovecraft shifted supernatural horror away from its previous focus on human issues to a focus on cosmic ones. In this way, he merged the elements of supernatural fiction that he deemed to be scientifically viable with science fiction. This merge required an understanding of both supernatural horror and then-contemporary science.[191] Lovecraft used this combined knowledge to create stories that extensively reference trends in scientific development. Beginning with «The Shunned House», Lovecraft increasingly incorporated elements of both Einsteinian science and his own personal materialism into his stories. This intensified with the writing of «The Call of Cthulhu», where he depicted alien influences on humanity. This trend would continue throughout the remainder of his literary career. «The Colour Out of Space» represents what scholars have called the peak of this trend. It portrays an alien lifeform whose otherness prevents it from being defined by then-contemporary science.[192]
Another part of this effort was the repeated usage of mathematics in an effort to make his creatures and settings appear more alien. Tom Hull, a mathematician, regards this as enhancing his ability to invoke a sense of otherness and fear. He attributes this use of mathematics to Lovecraft’s childhood interest in astronomy and his adulthood awareness of non-Euclidean geometry.[193] Another reason for his use of mathematics was his reaction to the scientific developments of his day. These developments convinced him that humanity’s primary means of understanding the world was no longer trustable. Lovecraft’s usage of mathematics in his fiction serves to convert otherwise supernatural elements into things that have in-universe scientific explanations. «The Dreams in the Witch House» and The Shadow Out of Time both have elements of this. The former uses a witch and her familiar, while the latter uses the idea of mind transference. These elements are explained using scientific theories that were prevalent during Lovecraft’s lifetime.[194]
Lovecraft Country
Setting plays a major role in Lovecraft’s fiction. Lovecraft Country, a fictionalized version of New England, serves as the central hub for his mythos. It represents the history, culture, and folklore of the region, as interpreted by Lovecraft. These attributes are exaggerated and altered to provide a suitable setting for his stories. The names of the locations in the region were directly influenced by the names of real locations in the region, which was done to increase their realism.[195] Lovecraft’s stories use their connections with New England to imbue themselves with the ability to instill fear.[196] Lovecraft was primarily inspired by the cities and towns in Massachusetts. However, the specific location of Lovecraft Country is variable, as it moved according to Lovecraft’s literary needs. Starting with areas that he thought were evocative, Lovecraft redefined and exaggerated them under fictional names. For example, Lovecraft based Arkham on the town of Oakham and expanded it to include a nearby landmark.[197] Its location was moved, as Lovecraft decided that it would have been destroyed by the recently-built Quabbin Reservoir. This is alluded to in «The Colour Out of Space», as the «blasted heath» is submerged by the creation of a fictionalized version of the reservoir.[198] Similarly, Lovecraft’s other towns were based on other locations in Massachusetts. Innsmouth was based on Newburyport, and Dunwich was based on Greenwich. The vague locations of these towns also played into Lovecraft’s desire to create a mood in his stories. In his view, a mood can only be evoked through reading.[199]
Critical reception
Literary
Early efforts to revise an established literary view of Lovecraft as an author of ‘pulp’ were resisted by some eminent critics; in 1945, Edmund Wilson sneered: «the only real horror in most of these fictions is the horror of bad taste and bad art.» However, Wilson praised Lovecraft’s ability to write about his chosen field; he described him as having written about it «with much intelligence».[200] According to L. Sprague de Camp, Wilson later improved his opinion of Lovecraft, citing a report of David Chavchavadze that Wilson had included a Lovecraftian reference in Little Blue Light: A Play in Three Acts. After Chavchavadze met with him to discuss this, Wilson revealed that he had been reading a copy of Lovecraft’s correspondence.[f][202] Two years before Wilson’s critique, Lovecraft’s works were reviewed by Winfield Townley Scott, the literary editor of The Providence Journal. He argued that Lovecraft was one of the most significant Rhode Island authors and that it was regrettable that he had received little attention from mainstream critics at the time.[203] Mystery and Adventure columnist Will Cuppy of the New York Herald Tribune recommended to readers a volume of Lovecraft’s stories in 1944, asserting that «the literature of horror and macabre fantasy belongs with mystery in its broader sense.»[204]
By 1957, Floyd C. Gale of Galaxy Science Fiction said that Lovecraft was comparable to Robert E. Howard, stating that «they appear more prolific than ever,» noting L. Sprague de Camp, Björn Nyberg, and August Derleth’s usage of their creations.[205] Gale also said that «Lovecraft at his best could build a mood of horror unsurpassed; at his worst, he was laughable.»[205] In 1962, Colin Wilson, in his survey of anti-realist trends in fiction The Strength to Dream, cited Lovecraft as one of the pioneers of the «assault on rationality» and included him with M. R. James, H. G. Wells, Aldous Huxley, J. R. R. Tolkien and others as one of the builders of mythicised realities contending against what he considered the failing project of literary realism.[206] Subsequently, Lovecraft began to acquire the status of a cult writer in the counterculture of the 1960s, and reprints of his work proliferated.[207]
Michael Dirda, a reviewer for The Times Literary Supplement, has described Lovecraft as being a «visionary» who is «rightly regarded as second only to Edgar Allan Poe in the annals of American supernatural literature.» According to him, Lovecraft’s works prove that mankind cannot bear the weight of reality, as the true nature of reality cannot be understood by either science or history. In addition, Dirda praises Lovecraft’s ability to create an uncanny atmosphere. This atmosphere is created through the feeling of wrongness that pervades the objects, places, and people in Lovecraft’s works. He also comments favorably on Lovecraft’s correspondence, and compares him to Horace Walpole. Particular attention is given to his correspondence with August Derleth and Robert E. Howard. The Derleth letters are called «delightful», while the Howard letters are described as being an ideological debate. Overall, Dirda believes that Lovecraft’s letters are equal to, or better than, his fictional output.[208]
Los Angeles Review of Books reviewer Nick Mamatas has stated that Lovecraft was a particularly difficult author, rather than a bad one. He described Lovecraft as being «perfectly capable» in the fields of story logic, pacing, innovation, and generating quotable phrases. However, Lovecraft’s difficulty made him ill-suited to the pulps; he was unable to compete with the popular recurring protagonists and damsel-in-distress stories. Furthermore, he compared a paragraph from The Shadow Out of Time to a paragraph from the introduction to The Economic Consequences of the Peace. In Mamatas’ view, Lovecraft’s quality is obscured by his difficulty, and his skill is what has allowed his following to outlive the followings of other then-prominent authors, such as Seabury Quinn and Kenneth Patchen.[209]
In 2005, the Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works. This volume was reviewed by many publications, including The New York Times Book Review and The Wall Street Journal, and sold 25,000 copies within a month of release. The overall critical reception of the volume was mixed.[210] Several scholars, including S. T. Joshi and Alison Sperling, have said that this confirms H. P. Lovecraft’s place in the western canon.[211] The editors of The Age of Lovecraft, Carl H. Sederholm and Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, attributed the rise of mainstream popular and academic interest in Lovecraft to this volume, along with the Penguin Classics volumes and the Modern Library edition of At the Mountains of Madness. These volumes led to a proliferation of other volumes containing Lovecraft’s works. According to the two authors, these volumes are part of a trend in Lovecraft’s popular and academic reception: increased attention by one audience causes the other to also become more interested. Lovecraft’s success is, in part, the result of his success.[212]
Lovecraft’s style has often been subject to criticism,[213] but scholars such as S. T. Joshi have argued that Lovecraft consciously utilized a variety of literary devices to form a unique style of his own—these include prose-poetic rhythm, stream of consciousness, alliteration, and conscious archaism.[214] According to Joyce Carol Oates, Lovecraft and Edgar Allan Poe have exerted a significant influence on later writers in the horror genre.[215] Horror author Stephen King called Lovecraft «the twentieth century’s greatest practitioner of the classic horror tale.»[216] King stated in his semi-autobiographical non-fiction book Danse Macabre that Lovecraft was responsible for his own fascination with horror and the macabre and was the largest influence on his writing.[217]
Philosophical
H. P. Lovecraft’s writings have influenced the speculative realist philosophical movement during the early twentieth-first century. The four founders of the movement, Ray Brassier, Iain Hamilton Grant, Graham Harman, and Quentin Meillassoux, have cited Lovecraft as an inspiration for their worldviews.[218] Graham Harman wrote a monograph, Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy, about Lovecraft and philosophy. In it, he argues that Lovecraft was a «productionist» author. He describes Lovecraft as having been an author who was uniquely obsessed with gaps in human knowledge.[219] He goes further and asserts Lovecraft’s personal philosophy as being in opposition to both idealism and David Hume. In his view, Lovecraft resembles Georges Braque, Pablo Picasso, and Edmund Husserl in his division of objects into different parts that do not exhaust the potential meanings of the whole. The anti-idealism of Lovecraft is represented through his commentary on the inability of language to describe his horrors.[220] Harman also credits Lovecraft with inspiring parts of his own articulation of object-oriented ontology.[221] According to Lovecraft scholar Alison Sperling, this philosophical interpretation of Lovecraft’s fiction has caused other philosophers in Harmon’s tradition to write about Lovecraft. These philosophers seek to remove human perception and human life from the foundations of ethics. These scholars have used Lovecraft’s works as the central example of their worldview. They base this usage in Lovecraft’s arguments against anthropocentrism and the ability of the human mind to truly understand the universe. They have also played a role in Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation by focusing on his interpretation of ontology, which gives him a central position in Anthropocene studies.[222]
Legacy
H. P. Lovecraft memorial plaque at 22 Prospect Street in Providence. Portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.
Lovecraft was relatively unknown during his lifetime. While his stories appeared in prominent pulp magazines such as Weird Tales, not many people knew his name.[223] He did, however, correspond regularly with other contemporary writers such as Clark Ashton Smith and August Derleth,[224] who became his friends, even though he never met them in person. This group became known as the «Lovecraft Circle», since their writings freely borrowed Lovecraft’s motifs, with his encouragement. He borrowed from them as well. For example, he made use of Clark Ashton Smith’s Tsathoggua in The Mound.[225]
After Lovecraft’s death, the Lovecraft Circle carried on. August Derleth founded Arkham House with Donald Wandrei to preserve Lovecraft’s works and keep them in print.[226] He added to and expanded on Lovecraft’s vision, not without controversy.[227] While Lovecraft considered his pantheon of alien gods a mere plot device, Derleth created an entire cosmology, complete with a war between the good Elder Gods and the evil Outer Gods, such as Cthulhu and his ilk. The forces of good were supposed to have won, locking Cthulhu and others beneath the earth, the ocean, and elsewhere. Derleth’s Cthulhu Mythos stories went on to associate different gods with the traditional four elements of fire, air, earth, and water, which did not line up with Lovecraft’s original vision of his mythos. However, Derleth’s ownership of Arkham House gave him a position of authority in Lovecraftiana that would not dissipate until his death, and through the efforts of Lovecraft scholars in the 1970s.[228]
Lovecraft’s works have influenced many writers and other creators. Stephen King has cited Lovecraft as a major influence on his works. As a child in the 1960s, he came across a volume of Lovecraft’s works which inspired him to write his fiction. He goes on to argue that all works in the horror genre that were written after Lovecraft were influenced by him.[216] In the field of comics, Alan Moore has described Lovecraft as having been a formative influence on his graphic novels.[229] Film director John Carpenter’s films include direct references and quotations of Lovecraft’s fiction, in addition to their use of a Lovecraftian aesthetic and themes. Guillermo del Toro has been similarly influenced by Lovecraft’s corpus.[230]
The first World Fantasy Awards were held in Providence in 1975. The theme was «The Lovecraft Circle». Until 2015, winners were presented with an elongated bust of Lovecraft that was designed by cartoonist Gahan Wilson, nicknamed the «Howard».[231] In November 2015 it was announced that the World Fantasy Award trophy would no longer be modeled on H. P. Lovecraft in response to the author’s views on race.[232] After the World Fantasy Award dropped their connection to Lovecraft, The Atlantic commented that «In the end, Lovecraft still wins—people who’ve never read a page of his work will still know who Cthulhu is for years to come, and his legacy lives on in the work of Stephen King, Guillermo del Toro, and Neil Gaiman.»[231]
In 2016, Lovecraft was inducted into the Museum of Pop Culture’s Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame.[233] Three years later, Lovecraft and the other mythos authors were posthumously awarded the 1945 Retro-Hugo Award for Best Series for their contributions to the Cthulhu Mythos.[234]
Lovecraft studies
Starting in the early 1970s, a body of scholarly work began to emerge around Lovecraft’s life and works. Referred to as Lovecraft studies, its proponents sought to establish Lovecraft as a significant author in the American literary canon. This can be traced to Derleth’s preservation and dissemination of Lovecraft’s fiction, non-fiction, and letters through Arkham House. Joshi credits the development of the field to this process. However, it was marred by low quality editions and misinterpretations of Lovecraft’s worldview. After Derleth’s death in 1971, the scholarship entered a new phase. There was a push to create a book-length biography of Lovecraft. L. Sprague de Camp, a science fiction scholar, wrote the first major one in 1975. This biography was criticized by early Lovecraft scholars for its lack of scholarly merit and its lack of sympathy for its subject. Despite this, it played a significant role in Lovecraft’s literary rise. It exposed Lovecraft to the mainstream of American literary criticism. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, there was a division in the field between the «Derlethian traditionalists» who wished to interpret Lovecraft through the lens of fantasy literature and the newer scholars who wished to place greater attention on the entirety of his corpus.[235]
The 1980s and 1990s saw a further proliferation of the field. The 1990 H. P. Lovecraft Centennial Conference and the republishing of older essays in An Epicure in the Terrible represented the publishing of many basic studies that would be used as a base for then-future studies. The 1990 centennial also saw the installation of the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Plaque» in a garden adjoining John Hay Library, that features a portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.[236] Following this, in 1996, S. T. Joshi wrote his own biography of Lovecraft. This biography was met with positive reviews and became the main biography in the field. It has since been superseded by his expanded edition of the book, I am Providence in 2010.[237]
Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation has caused his works to receive increased attention by both classics publishers and scholarly fans.[238] His works have been published by several different series of literary classics. Penguin Classics published three volumes of Lovecraft’s works between 1999 and 2004. These volumes were edited by S. T. Joshi.[238] Barnes & Noble would publish their own volume of Lovecraft’s complete fiction in 2008. The Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works in 2005. The publishing of these volumes represented a reversal of the traditional judgment that Lovecraft was not part of the Western canon.[239] Meanwhile, the biannual NecronomiCon Providence convention was first held in 2013. Its purpose is to serve as a fan and scholarly convention that discusses both Lovecraft and the wider field of weird fiction. It is organized by the Lovecraft Arts and Sciences organization and is held on the weekend of Lovecraft’s birth.[240] That July, the Providence City Council designated the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Square» and installed a commemorative sign at the intersection of Angell and Prospect streets, near the author’s former residences.[241]
Music
Lovecraft’s fictional Mythos has influenced a number of musicians, particularly in rock and heavy metal music.[242] This began in the 1960s with the formation of the psychedelic rock band H. P. Lovecraft, who released the albums H. P. Lovecraft and H. P. Lovecraft II in 1967 and 1968 respectively.[243] They broke up afterwards, but later songs were released. This included «The White Ship» and «At the Mountains of Madness», both titled after Lovecraft stories.[244] Extreme metal has also been influenced by Lovecraft.[245] This has expressed itself in both the names of bands and the contents of their albums. This began in 1970 with the release of Black Sabbath’s first album, Black Sabbath, which contained a song titled Behind the Wall of Sleep, deriving its name from the 1919 story «Beyond the Wall of Sleep.»[245] Heavy metal band Metallica was also inspired by Lovecraft. They recorded a song inspired by «The Call of Cthulhu», «The Call of Ktulu», and a song based on The Shadow over Innsmouth titled «The Thing That Should Not Be».[246] These songs contain direct quotations of Lovecraft’s works.[247] Joseph Norman, a speculative scholar, has argued that there are similarities between the music described in Lovecraft’s fiction and the aesthetics and atmosphere of black metal. He argues that this is evident through the «animalistic» qualities of black metal vocals. The usage of occult elements is also cited as a thematic commonality. In terms of atmosphere, he asserts that both Lovecraft’s works and extreme metal place heavy focus on creating a strong negative mood.[248]
Games
Lovecraft has also influenced gaming, despite having personally disliked games during his lifetime.[249] Chaosium’s tabletop role-playing game Call of Cthulhu, released in 1981 and currently in its seventh major edition, was one of the first games to draw heavily from Lovecraft.[250] It includes a Lovecraft-inspired insanity mechanic, which allowed for player characters to go insane from contact with cosmic horrors. This mechanic would go on to make appearance in subsequent tabletop and video games.[251] 1987 saw the release of another Lovecraftian board game, Arkham Horror, which was published by Fantasy Flight Games.[252] Though few subsequent Lovecraftian board games were released annually from 1987 to 2014, the years after 2014 saw a rapid increase in the number of Lovecraftian board games. According to Christina Silva, this revival may have been influenced by the entry of Lovecraft’s work into the public domain and a revival of interest in board games.[253] Few video games are direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s works, but many video games have been inspired or heavily influenced by Lovecraft.[251] Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth, a Lovecraftian first-person video game, was released in 2005.[251] It is a loose adaptation of The Shadow over Innsmouth, The Shadow Out of Time, and «The Thing on the Doorstep» that uses noir themes.[254] These adaptations focus more on Lovecraft’s monsters and gamification than they do on his themes, which represents a break from Lovecraft’s core theme of human insignificance.[255]
Religion and occultism
Several contemporary religions have been influenced by Lovecraft’s works. Kenneth Grant, the founder of the Typhonian Order, incorporated Lovecraft’s Mythos into his ritual and occult system. Grant combined his interest in Lovecraft’s fiction with his adherence to Aleister Crowley’s Thelema. The Typhonian Order considers Lovecraftian entities to be symbols through which people may interact with something inhuman.[256] Grant also argued that Crowley himself was influenced by Lovecraft’s writings, particularly in the naming of characters in The Book of the Law.[257] Similarly, The Satanic Rituals, co-written by Anton LaVey and Michael A. Aquino, includes the «Ceremony of the Nine Angles», which is a ritual that was influenced by the descriptions in «The Dreams in the Witch House». It contains invocations of several of Lovecraft’s fictional gods.[258]
There have been several books that have claimed to be an authentic edition of Lovecraft’s Necronomicon.[259] The Simon Necronomicon is one such example. It was written by an unknown figure who identified themselves as «Simon». Peter Levenda, an occult author who has written about the Necronomicon, claims that he and «Simon» came across a hidden Greek translation of the grimoire while looking through a collection of antiquities at a New York bookstore during the 1960s or 1970s.[260] This book was claimed to have borne the seal of the Necronomicon. Levenda went on to claim that Lovecraft had access to this purported scroll.[261] A textual analysis has determined that the contents of this book were derived from multiple documents that discuss Mesopotamian myth and magic. The finding of a magical text by monks is also a common theme in the history of grimoires.[262] It has been suggested that Levenda is the true author of the Simon Necronomicon.[263]
Correspondence
Although Lovecraft is known mostly for his works of weird fiction, the bulk of his writing consists of voluminous letters about a variety of topics, from weird fiction and art criticism to politics and history.[264] Lovecraft biographers L. Sprague de Camp and S. T. Joshi have estimated that Lovecraft wrote 100,000 letters in his lifetime, a fifth of which are believed to survive.[265] These letters were directed at fellow writers and members of the amateur press. His involvement in the latter was what caused him to begin writing them.[266] He included comedic elements in these letters. This included posing as an eighteenth-century gentleman and signing them with pseudonyms, most commonly «Grandpa Theobald» and «E’ch-Pi-El.»[g][268] According to Joshi, the most important sets of letters were those written to Frank Belknap Long, Clark Ashton Smith, and James F. Morton. He attributes this importance to the contents of these letters. With Long, Lovecraft argued in support and in opposition to many of Long’s viewpoints. The letters to Clark Ashton Smith are characterized by their focus on weird fiction. Lovecraft and Morton debated many scholarly subjects in their letters, resulting in what Joshi has called the «single greatest correspondence Lovecraft ever wrote.»[269]
Copyright and other legal issues
Despite several claims to the contrary, there is currently no evidence that any company or individual owns the copyright to any of Lovecraft’s works, and it is generally accepted that it has passed into the public domain.[270] Lovecraft had specified that R. H. Barlow would serve as the executor of his literary estate,[271] but these instructions were not incorporated into his will. Nevertheless, his surviving aunt carried out his expressed wishes, and Barlow was given control of Lovecraft’s literary estate upon his death. Barlow deposited the bulk of the papers, including the voluminous correspondence, in the John Hay Library, and attempted to organize and maintain Lovecraft’s other writings.[272] Lovecraft protégé August Derleth, an older and more established writer than Barlow, vied for control of the literary estate. He and Donald Wandrei, a fellow protégé and co-owner of Arkham House, falsely claimed that Derleth was the true literary executor.[273] Barlow capitulated, and later committed suicide in 1951.[274] This gave Derleth and Wandrei complete control over Lovecraft’s corpus.[275]
On October 9, 1947, Derleth purchased all rights to the stories that were published in Weird Tales. However, since April 1926 at the latest, Lovecraft had reserved all second printing rights to stories published in Weird Tales. Therefore, Weird Tales only owned the rights to at most six of Lovecraft’s tales. If Derleth had legally obtained the copyrights to these tales, there is no evidence that they were renewed before the rights expired.[276] Following Derleth’s death in 1971, Donald Wandrei sued his estate to challenge Derleth’s will, which stated that he only held the copyrights and royalties to Lovecraft’s works that were published under both his and Derleth’s names. Arkham House’s lawyer, Forrest D. Hartmann, argued that the rights to Lovecraft’s works were never renewed. Wandrei won the case, but Arkham House’s actions regarding copyright have damaged their ability to claim ownership of them.[277]
In H. P. Lovecraft: A Life, S. T. Joshi concludes that Derleth’s claims are «almost certainly fictitious» and argues that most of Lovecraft’s works that were published in the amateur press are likely in the public domain. The copyright for Lovecraft’s works would have been inherited by the only surviving heir named in his 1912 will, his aunt Annie Gamwell.[278] When she died in 1941, the copyrights passed to her remaining descendants, Ethel Phillips Morrish and Edna Lewis. They signed a document, sometimes referred to as the Morrish-Lewis gift, permitting Arkham House to republish Lovecraft’s works while retaining their ownership of the copyrights.[279] Searches of the Library of Congress have failed to find any evidence that these copyrights were renewed after the 28-year period, making it likely that these works are in the public domain.[280] However, the Lovecraft literary estate, reconstituted in 1998 under Robert C. Harrall, has claimed that they own the rights. Joshi has withdrawn his support for his conclusion, and now supports the estate’s copyright claims.[281]
Bibliography
See also
- Category:H. P. Lovecraft scholars
Explanatory notes
- ^ Lovecraft did not coin the term «Cthulhu Mythos». Instead, this term was coined by later authors.[1]
- ^ The house was later moved to 65 Prospect Street to accommodate the building of Brown University’s Art Building.[101]
- ^ He wrote several travelogues, including one on Quebec that was the longest singular work that he wrote.[107]
- ^ This is the only one of Lovecraft’s stories that was published as a book during his lifetime.[118] W. Paul Cook had previously made an abortive attempt to publish «The Shunned House» as a small book between 1927 and 1930.[119]
- ^ «Grippe» is an archaic term for influenza.[123]
- ^ L. Sprague de Camp also stated that the two men began calling each other «Monstro». This is a direct reference to the nicknames that Lovecraft gave to some of his correspondents.[201]
- ^ Lewis Theobald, Jun., the full version of Grandpa Theobald, was derived from the name of Lewis Theobald, an eighteenth-century Shakespearian scholar who was fictionalized in Alexander Pope’s The Dunciad.[267]
Citations
- ^ a b Tierney 2001, p. 52; Joshi 2010b, p. 186; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 16; de Camp 1975, p. 12; Cannon 1989, p. 1–2.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 8; de Camp 1975, p. 11; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ Joshi 2010a.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 22; de Camp 1975, pp. 15–16; Faig 1991, p. 49.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26; de Camp 1975, p. 16; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; de Camp 1975, p. 17; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 2; Cannon 1989, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 25; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, pp. 33, 36; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 34; de Camp 1975, pp. 30–31.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 38; de Camp 1975, pp. 32; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ a b Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; St. Armand 1975, pp. 140–141.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 42; St. Armand 1972, pp. 3–4; de Camp 1975, pp. 18.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 60; de Camp 1975, p. 32.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 84.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 90; Cannon 1989, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 97; Faig 1991, p. 63.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 96; de Camp 1975, pp. 37–39; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 98; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48; Faig 1991, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 99.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 102; de Camp 1975, p. 36.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 116; de Camp 1975, pp. 43–45; Cannon 1989, p. 15.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–53; Cannon 1989, p. 3.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 126–127; de Camp 1975, p. 27.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 127.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 128; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–52.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 128.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 66; Faig 1991, p. 65.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 67–68; de Camp 1975, p. 66; St. Armand 1972, p. 3.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 64.
- ^ Bonner 2015, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 154.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 129; de Camp 1975.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 137.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 138; de Camp 1975, p. 95.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 140; de Camp 1975, pp. 76–77.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, p. 76–77.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, pp. 78–79.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, pp. 145–155; de Camp 1975, p. 84.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 155; de Camp 1975, pp. 84–84.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 159.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 164.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 165.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 168; de Camp 1975, p. 153; Cannon 1989, p. 5.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 169.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 180; de Camp 1975, p. 121.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 182; de Camp 1975, pp. 121–122.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 210; Cannon 1989, p. 6.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 273; de Camp 1975, p. 125.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 239; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 240; Cannon 1989, p. 16.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 251; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 260; de Camp 1975, p. 137.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 284; de Camp 1975, p. 122.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 303; Faig 1991, p. 66.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 300; Faig 1991, pp. 66–67.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 23; Cannon 1989, p. 3; de Camp 1975, p. 118.
- ^ a b Joshi 2001, p. 125.
- ^ a b Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2001, pp. 121–122; de Camp 1975, p. 65–66.
- ^ Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2010a, p. 301; de Camp 1975, pp. 134–135.
- ^ Lovecraft 2000, p. 84.
- ^ Faig 1991, pp. 58–59; de Camp 1975, p. 135.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 306; de Camp 1975, pp. 139–141.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 308.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144; Burleson 1990, pp. 39.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; Leavenworth 2014, pp. 333–334.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 369; de Camp 1975, pp. 138–139.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 149; Burleson 1990, pp. 49, 52–53.
- ^ Burleson 1990, p. 58; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
- ^ Mosig 2001, pp. 17–18, 33; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154; Cannon 1989, pp. 4–5.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 144–145; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156; Faig 1991, p. 67.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 400; de Camp 1975, p. 152–154; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Fooy 2011; de Camp 1975, p. 184.
- ^ Everts 2012, p. 19; Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 202–203; de Camp 1975, p. 202.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 291–292; de Camp 1975, pp. 177–179, 219; Cannon 1989, p. 55.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 136; de Camp 1975, p. 219.
- ^ Fooy 2011; Cannon 1989, p. 55; Joshi 2001, p. 210.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 109–111; Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 112.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, p. 224.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, pp. 207–213.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001; St. Armand 1972, p. 10.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 225; de Camp 1975, p. 183.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 200–201; de Camp 1975, pp. 170–172.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 216–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 230–232.
- ^ Lovecraft 2009b.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 223–224; Norris 2020, p. 217; de Camp 1975, pp. 242–243.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Burleson 1990, p. 77.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 227–228; Moreland 2018, pp. 1–3; Cannon 1989, pp. 61–62.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 214–215.
- ^ Rubinton 2016; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ a b Joshi 1996a, p. 26; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354; St. Armand 1972, pp. 10–14.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–353; Goodrich 2004, pp. 37–38.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 117; Flood 2016.
- ^ Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8; Evans 2005, pp. 102–105.
- ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, p. 104; Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273; Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149, 184; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 150–151; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 273.
- ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53; Joshi 2001, p. 255; de Camp 1975, pp. 192–194.
- ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Joshi 1996b, p. 455.
- ^ Lovecraft 1976b; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 382–383.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 262–263.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 383–384.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Finn 2013, pp. 294–295; Vick 2021, pp. 130–137.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006c, pp. 216–218; Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Vick 2021, p. 143.
- ^ Lexico Dictionaries 2020.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 370, 384–385; Cannon 1989, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 415–416.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388; de Camp 1975, pp. 427–428.
- ^ The Boston Globe 1937, p. 2; Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 389; de Camp 1975, p. 428.
- ^ Mosig 1997, p. 114; Lovecraft 1968, pp. 50–51.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 8–16; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 9; Joshi 2016, p. 161.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 16; Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 94–96.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 101–102; Pedersen 2019, pp. 119–120.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 351; Pedersen 2019, pp. 141–143.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 346.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–4; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–35; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006d, pp. 85–95; Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 360–361.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, p. 145; Hölzing 2011, pp. 182–183.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; Zeller 2019, p. 18.
- ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–174.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 147–148; Joshi 2001, pp. 40, 130–133.
- ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, pp. 108–110; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
- ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Evans 2005, pp. 108–109; Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–186.
- ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Punter 1996, p. 40.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 162–163; Hambly 1996, p. viii; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–187; Evans 2005, pp. 123–125; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 221–223; Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55.
- ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, p. 125; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
- ^ Joshi 2015, p. 109.
- ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
- ^ Joshi 2015, p. 108–109; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 21–24.
- ^ a b c Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48.
- ^ Pedersen 2018, pp. 172–173; Joshi 2013, p. 263; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
- ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
- ^ Joshi 2017, pp. x–xi.
- ^ Lovecraft 2009a; Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; Cannon 1989, pp. 101–103.
- ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 135–137; Schweitzer 2018, pp. 139–143; Joshi 2013, pp. 260–261.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 253.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 168–169; Joshi 2001, pp. 228–229; St. Armand 1975, p. 142.
- ^ a b St. Armand 1975, pp. 127–128.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, p. 127.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–131.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 133–137.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 145–150.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173; Rottensteiner 1992, pp. 117–121.
- ^ Woodard 2011, p. 6; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173.
- ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, p. 174.
- ^ Lovecraft 2010, p. 97; Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
- ^ Macrobert 2015, pp. 34–39; Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
- ^ Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
- ^ Lovecraft 2014, p. 7.
- ^ Touponce 2013, pp. 62–63; Matthews 2018, p. 177; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–160.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 186–187; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–157.
- ^ Leiber 2001, p. 6; Lacy & Zani 2007, p. 70; Burleson 1990, pp. 158–159.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Pedersen 2017, pp. 28–33.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, pp. 262–263.
- ^ St. Armand 1972, pp. 14–15; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Cannon 1989, p. 73.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 314–320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 131–132.
- ^ Joshi 2016, pp. 314–320.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 316.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–172.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 183–188; Martin 2012, p. 99; Burleson 1990, pp. 107–110.
- ^ Hull 2006, pp. 10–12.
- ^ Look 2016, pp. 101–103; Halpurn & Labossiere 2009, pp. 512–513.
- ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
- ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135.
- ^ Murray 1986, pp. 54–67.
- ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29; Burleson 1990, pp. 106, 118.
- ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29.
- ^ Wilson 1950, pp. 286–290.
- ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5.
- ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5; Cannon 1989, p. 126.
- ^ Scott 1943, p. 41.
- ^ Cuppy 1944, p. 10.
- ^ a b Gale 1960, pp. 100–103.
- ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 1–10.
- ^ Lovecraft 2013, pp. xiii–xiv.
- ^ Dirda 2012.
- ^ Mamatas 2014.
- ^ Lovecraft Annual 2007, p. 160; Eberhart 2005, p. 82; Grant 2005, p. 146.
- ^ Joshi 2015, pp. 105–116; Sperling 2016, p. 75; Hantke 2013, pp. 137–138.
- ^ Sederholm & Weinstock 2016, pp. 2, 8–9.
- ^ Gray 2014; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 91, 252.
- ^ Oates 1996.
- ^ a b Wohleber 1995.
- ^ King 1987, p. 63.
- ^ Peak 2020, pp. 169–172; Elfren 2016.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89.
- ^ Sperling 2016, pp. 75–78.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; Dirda 2005; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
- ^ Schoell 2004, pp. 8–40.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 141–142.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 390–391; de Camp 1975, p. 132; Hantke 2013, p. 135–136.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52–53; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
- ^ Talbot 2014.
- ^ Janicker 2015, pp. 473; Norris 2018, pp. 158–159; Nelson 2012, pp. 221–222.
- ^ a b Cruz 2015.
- ^ Flood 2015.
- ^ Locus Online 2017.
- ^ The Hugo Awards 2020.
- ^ Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64; Joshi 1985a, pp. 19–25; Joshi 1985b, pp. 54–58.
- ^ Rubinton 2016; Joshi 2001, pp. 219.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 5–6; Oates 1996; Mariconda 2010, pp. 208–209.
- ^ a b Hantke 2013, p. 138; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Dziemianowicz 2010; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Siclen 2015; Smith 2017; Dirda 2019.
- ^ Bilow 2013.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, p. 7; Sederholm 2016, pp. 266–267.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24; Sederholm 2016, p. 271.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24.
- ^ a b Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
- ^ Griwkowsky 2008; Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272; Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
- ^ Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272.
- ^ Norman 2013, pp. 197–202.
- ^ Lovecraft 1976a, p. 13; Carbonell 2019, p. 137.
- ^ Carbonell 2019, p. 160; Gollop 2017; Garrad 2021, p. 25.
- ^ a b c Gollop 2017.
- ^ Gollop 2017; Silva 2017; Garrad 2021, pp. 26–27.
- ^ Silva 2017.
- ^ Garrad 2021, pp. 27–28.
- ^ Garrad 2021, p. 28.
- ^ Engle 2014, pp. 89–90; Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
- ^ Engle 2014, p. 89–90.
- ^ Engle 2014, p. 91.
- ^ Clore 2001, pp. 61–69.
- ^ Levenda 2014.
- ^ Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
- ^ Davies 2009, p. 268.
- ^ Flatley 2013.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242; Cannon 1989, p. 10; de Camp 1975, p. xii.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. xii; Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–237.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–239.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; Wetzel 1983, pp. 19–20.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 245–246; Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 113–114.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242.
- ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 12.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 4–6.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 432; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, pp. 10–12.
- ^ Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, p. 11.
- ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641.
- ^ Karr 2018, The «Donald Wandrei v. The Estate of August Derleth» Hypothesis.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640; Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights.
- ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 641; Wetzel 1983, pp. 24–25.
- ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 25.
- ^ Karr 2018, Coda.
General and cited sources
- «1945 Retro-Hugo Awards». The Hugo Awards. 2020. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020.
- «2016 SF&F Hall of Fame Inductees». Locus Online. January 17, 2017. Archived from the original on December 22, 2019.
- Bilow, Michael (July 27, 2013). «We are Providence: The H.P. Lovecraft Community». Motif Magazine. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013.
- Bonner, Marian F. (2015). «Miscellaneous Impressions of H.P.L.». Lovecraft Annual (9): 52–53. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868496.
- «Briefly Noted». Lovecraft Annual (1): 160. 2007. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868367.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1990). Lovecraft: Disturbing the Universe (First ed.). Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9319-9. JSTOR j.ctt130jf9h. OCLC 895675279.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1991–1992). «Lovecraft: Dreams and Reality». Books at Brown. 38–39: 7–12. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
- Butler, James O. (2014). «Terror and Terrain: The Environmental Semantics of Lovecraft County». Lovecraft Annual (8): 131–149. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868485.
- Cannon, Peter (1989). H. P. Lovecraft. Twayne’s United States Authors Series. Vol. 549. Boston: Twayne. ISBN 0-8057-7539-0. OCLC 246440364.
- Carbonell, Curtis D. (2019). «Lovecraft’s (Cthulhu) Mythos». Dread Trident: Tabletop Role-Playing Games and the Modern Fantastic. Liverpool University Press. pp. 137–165. doi:10.3828/liverpool/9781789620573.003.0005. ISBN 978-1-78962-468-7. JSTOR j.ctv12pntt4.8. OCLC 1155494616. S2CID 219891871.
- Clore, Dan (n.d.) [first published Fall 2001]. «The Lurker on the Threshold of Interpretation: Hoax Necronomicons and Paratextual Noise». Lovecraft Studies (42–43): 61–69. ISSN 0899-8361. Archived from the original on October 26, 2009 – via Yahoo! GeoCities.
- Cruz, Lenika (November 12, 2015). «‘Political Correctness’ Won’t Ruin H.P. Lovecraft’s Legacy». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015.
- Cuppy, Will (January 2, 1944). «Review of Beyond the Wall of Sleep». New York Herald Tribune. p. 10. ISSN 1941-0646.
- Davies, Owen (2009). Grimoires: A History of Magic Books. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-150924-7. OCLC 434863058.
- de Camp, L. Sprague (March 1979). «H. P. Lovecraft and Edmund Wilson». Fantasy Mongers. No. 1. ISSN 8755-7479.
- de Camp, L. Sprague (1975). Lovecraft: A Biography (First ed.). Garden City, New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-00578-4. OCLC 979196. S2CID 190754775.
- Dirda, Michael (2012). «Cthulhu for President». The Times Literary Supplement. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020.
- Dirda, Michael (September 4, 2019). «Dispatch from a ‘Horror’ Convention: It Began in a Dark, Candlelit Room . . «. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. ProQuest 2284363189. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Dirda, Michael (March 7, 2005). «The Horror, the Horror!». The Weekly Standard. ISSN 1083-3013. Archived from the original on November 5, 2009.
- Dziemianowicz, Stefan (July 12, 2010). «Terror Eternal: The Enduring Popularity of H. P. Lovecraft». Publishers Weekly. ISSN 0000-0019. ProQuest 609957378.
- Eberhart, John Mark (February 13, 2005). «The Library of Lovecraft». The Kansas City Star. p. 82. ISSN 0745-1067. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Elfren, Isabella van (2016). «Hyper-Cacophony: Lovecraft, Speculative Realism, and Sonic Materialism». In Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (eds.). The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 79–96. ISBN 978-0-8166-9925-4. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.8. OCLC 945632985. S2CID 194316992.
- Engle, John (October 15, 2014). «Cults of Lovecraft: The Impact of H.P. Lovecraft’s Fiction on Contemporary Occult Practices». Mythlore. 33 (125): 85–98. JSTOR 26815942. S2CID 159074285 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
- Evans, Timothy H. (2005). «A Last Defense against the Dark: Folklore, Horror, and the Uses of Tradition in the Works of H. P. Lovecraft». Journal of Folklore Research. 42 (1): 99–135. doi:10.2979/JFR.2005.42.1.99. ISSN 0737-7037. JSTOR 3814792. S2CID 162356996.
- Everts, R. Alain (June 22, 2012) [first published July 1974]. «Howard Phillips Lovecraft and Sex: or The Sex Life of a Gentleman». Nyctalops. Vol. 2, no. 2. p. 19. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019 – via The H. P. Lovecraft Archive.
- Faig, Kenneth W. Jr. (1991). «The Parents of Howard Phillips Lovecraft». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). An Epicure in the Terrible: A Centennial Anthology of Essays in Honor of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). Madison, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 45–77. ISBN 0-8386-3415-X. OCLC 22766987.
- Finn, Mark (2013). Blood and Thunder: The Life and Art of Robert E. Howard (Third ed.). Cross Plains, Texas: Robert E. Howard Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-304-03152-5. OCLC 923870328.
- Flatley, Joseph L. (November 12, 2013). «The Cult of Cthulhu: Real Prayer for a Fake Tentacle». The Verge. Archived from the original on October 29, 2019.
- Flood, Alison (March 16, 2016). «Lost HP Lovecraft Work Commissioned by Houdini Escapes Shackles of History». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on October 8, 2016.
- Flood, Alison (November 9, 2015). «World Fantasy Award Drops HP Lovecraft as Prize Image». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 18, 2015.
- Fooy, Frederick (October 27, 2011). «Resident Horror Genius». South Brooklyn Post. Archived from the original on August 2, 2016.
- Gale, Floyd C. (April 1960). «Galaxy’s 5 Star Shelf». Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 100–103.
- Garrad, Jonathan (November 15, 2021). «Gamifying Fictions of Defeat: Adaptations of Lovecraft to Games Media». Studies in Gothic Fiction. 7: 20–29. ISSN 2156-2407.
- Gollop, Julian (November 16, 2017). «The Gollop Chamber: Where Are All the Lovecraftian Games?». PC Gamer. Archived from the original on March 7, 2018.
- Goodrich, Peter (2004). «Mannerism and the Macabre in H. P. Lovecraft’s Dunsanian ‘Dream-Quest’«. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 15 (1 (57)): 37–48. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 43308683.
- Grant, Gavin J. (April 17, 2005). «That Delicious Feeling of Dread». The Los Angeles Times. p. 146. ISSN 0458-3035. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Gray, John (October 24, 2014). «Weird Realism: John Gray on the Moral Universe of H P Lovecraft». New Statesman. ISSN 1758-924X. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016.
- Greene, Sonia; Scott, Winfield Townley (August 22, 1948). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft as His Wife Remembers Him». The Providence Journal. p. 8. ISSN 2574-3406. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022.
- Griwkowsky, Fish (December 8, 2008). «Interview with James Hetfield». Jam.canoe.ca. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012.
- «Grippe». Lexico Dictionaries. Archived from the original on January 23, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
- Halpurn, Paul; Labossiere, Michael C. (2009). «Mind Out of Time: Identity, Perception, and the Fourth Dimension in H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Shadow Out of Time’ and ‘The Dreams in the Witch House’«. Extrapolation. 50 (3): 512–533, 375. doi:10.3828/extr.2009.50.3.8. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 162319821. ProQuest 2152642098.
- Hambly, Barbara (1996). «Introduction: The Man Who Loved His Craft». The Transition of H. P. Lovecraft: The Road to Madness (First ed.). New York: Ballantine Books. pp. vii–x. ISBN 0-345-38422-9. OCLC 34669226.
- Hantke, Steffen (2013). «From the Library of America to the Mountains of Madness: Recent Discourse on H. P. Lovecraft». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135–156. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_9. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 163339940.
- Harman, Graham (2012). Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78099-907-4. OCLC 1058277738.
- Hess, Clara (1971). «Addenda to ‘H.P.L.: A Memoir’«. In Derleth, August (ed.). Something about Cats, and Other Pieces (First ed.). Books for Libraries Press. pp. 247–277. ISBN 0-8369-2410-X. OCLC 222440.
- Hill, Gary; Joshi, S. T. (2006). The Strange Sound of Cthulhu: Music Inspired by the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft. United States: Music Street Journal. ISBN 978-1-84728-776-2. OCLC 128175889.
- Hölzing, Roland (2011). «Lovecraft: A Gentleman without Five Senses». Lovecraft Annual (5): 181–187. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868439.
- Hull, Thomas (2006). «H.P. Lovecraft: A Horror in Higher Dimensions». Math Horizons. Vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 10–12. doi:10.1080/10724117.2006.11974625. ISSN 1072-4117. JSTOR 25678597.
- Jamneck, Lynne (2012). «Tekeli-li! Disturbing Language in Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (6): 126–151. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868454.
- Janicker, Rebecca (2015). «Visions of Monstrosity: Lovecraft, Adaptation and the Comics Arts». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 469–488. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321171.
- Joshi, S. T. (2001). A Dreamer and a Visionary: H. P. Lovecraft in His Time. Liverpool Science Fiction Texts and Studies. Vol. 26 (First ed.). Liverpool University Press. doi:10.5949/upo9781846312991. ISBN 978-1-84631-299-1. JSTOR j.ctt5vjhg7. OCLC 276177497.
- Joshi, S. T. (1996a). A Subtler Magick: The Writings and Philosophy of H.P. Lovecraft (Third ed.). Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-61-0. OCLC 4566934. S2CID 169172551.
- Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (2001). An H.P. Lovecraft Encyclopedia (First ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-01682-8. OCLC 608158798.
- Joshi, S. T. (2015). «Charles Baxter on Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (9): 105–122. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868501.
- Joshi, S. T. (2013). «Lovecraft’s ‘Dunsanian Studies’«. In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Critical Essays on Lord Dunsany. Scarecrow Press. pp. 241–264. ISBN 978-0-8108-9235-4. OCLC 1026953908.
- Joshi, S. T. (1996b). H. P. Lovecraft: A Life (First ed.). West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. ISBN 0-940884-89-5. OCLC 34906142.
- Joshi, S. T. (2016). H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West (First ed.). Wildside Press. ISBN 978-1-4794-2754-3. OCLC 988396691.
- Joshi, S. T. (2010a). I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-0-9824296-7-9. OCLC 650504348. S2CID 190428196.
- Joshi, S. T. (1984). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies 1971–1982 (Part I)». Lovecraft Studies. 3 (2): 62–71. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (1985a). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part II)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (1): 18–28. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (1985b). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part III)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (2): 54–65. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (2017). «Foreword». In Moreland, Sean (ed.). The Lovecraftian Poe: Essays on Influence, Reception, Interpretation, and Transformation. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: Lehigh University Press. pp. ix–xiv. ISBN 978-1-61146-241-8. OCLC 973481779.
- Joshi, S. T. (2010b). «Time, Space, and Natural Law: Science and Pseudo-Science in Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (4): 171–201. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868421.
- Karr, Chris J. (July 10, 2018). «The Black Seas of Copyright». Aetherial. Archived from the original on April 25, 2020.
- King, Stephen (1987). Danse Macabre. Berkley. ISBN 0-425-06462-X. OCLC 10242612. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
- Klein, Anna (2012). «Misperceptions of Malignity: Narrative Form and the Threat to America’s Modernity in ‘The Shadow over Innsmouth’«. Lovecraft Annual (6): 182–198. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868459.
- Lacy, Jeff; Zani, Steven J. (2007). «The Negative Mystics of the Mechanistic Sublime: Walter Benjamin and Lovecraft’s Cosmicism». Lovecraft Annual (1): 65–83. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868355. S2CID 11647892.
- Leavenworth, Van (2014). «The Developing Storyworld of H. P. Lovecraft». In Ryan, Marie-Laure; Thon, Jan-Noël (eds.). Storyworlds Across Media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology. Frontiers of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 332–350. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. ISBN 978-0-8032-5532-6. JSTOR j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. OCLC 880964681. S2CID 190258640.
- Leiber, Fritz (2001) [first published 1949]. «A Literary Copernicus». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft (Revised ed.). Holicong, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 7–16. ISBN 1-58715-470-6. OCLC 48212283.
- Levenda, Peter (November 30, 2014). «Finding the Simon Necronomicon». The Lip TV. Archived from the original on February 6, 2022 – via YouTube.
- Livesey, T. R. (2008). «Dispatches from the Providence Observatory: Astronomical Motifs and Sources in the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (2): 3–87. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868370.
- Look, Daniel M. (2016). «Queer Geometry and Higher Dimensions: Mathematics in the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (10): 101–120. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868515.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2010) [written November 22, 1930]. «Religion and Indeterminacy». In Joshi, S. T.; Hitchens, Christopher (eds.). Against Religion: The Atheist Writings of H.P. Lovecraft. New York: Sporting Gentlemen. pp. 87–99. ISBN 978-0-578-05248-9. OCLC 665081122.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009a). «At the Mountains of Madness». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006a) [first published February 1922]. «A Confession of Unfaith». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 145–148. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006b). «Instructions in Case of Decease». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 237–240. ISBN 978-0-9721644-1-2. OCLC 875361303.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006c) [first published 1936]. «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 216–218. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006d) [written February 22, 1933]. «Some Repetitions on the Times». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 85–95. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009b). «He». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2014). Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). «Letters to Farnsworth Wright». Lovecraft Annual (8): 5–59. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868482.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2000). «Amateur Journalism». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). Lord of a Visible World: An Autobiography in Letters. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. pp. 39–86. ISBN 0-8214-1332-5. OCLC 43567292.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1968) [sent May 16, 1926]. «To James F. Morton». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. II. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 50–51. ISBN 0-87054-034-3. OCLC 1152654519.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1976a). Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. IV. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-035-1. OCLC 20590805.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1976b) [sent February 7, 1937]. «To Catherine L. Moore». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. V. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 407–408. ISBN 0-87054-036-X. OCLC 1000556488.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2013). Luckhurst, Roger (ed.). The Classic Horror Stories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-164088-9. OCLC 958573276. S2CID 190969085.
- Lovett-Graff, Bennett (1997). «Shadows over Lovecraft: Reactionary Fantasy and Immigrant Eugenics». Extrapolation. 38 (3): 175–192. doi:10.3828/extr.1997.38.3.175. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 164434496. ProQuest 234914041.
- Lubnow, Fred S. (2019). «The Lovecraftian Solar System». Lovecraft Annual (13): 3–26. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868571.
- Macrobert, Franch A. (2015). «Cosmic Dread: The Astronomy of H. P. Lovecraft». Sky & Telescope. Vol. 129, no. 2. pp. 34–39. ISSN 0037-6604.
- Mamatas, Nick (November 24, 2014). «The Real Mr. Difficult, or Why Cthulhu Threatens to Destroy the Canon, Self-Interested Literary Essayists, and the Universe Itself. Finally». Los Angeles Review of Books. Archived from the original on June 15, 2016.
- Mariconda, Steven J. (2010). «Review of I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft«. Lovecraft Annual (4): 208–215. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868424.
- Martin, Sean Elliot (2012). «Lovecraft, Absurdity, and the Modernist Grotesque». Lovecraft Annual (6): 82–112. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868452.
- Matthews, Carol S. (April 15, 2018). «Letting Sleeping Abnormalities Lie: Lovecraft and the Futility of Divination». Mythlore. 36 (2): 165–184. JSTOR 26809310. S2CID 165217534. ProQuest 2036317509 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
- Moreland, Sean (2018). «Introduction: The Critical (After)Life of Supernatural Horror in Literature«. New Directions in Supernatural Horror Literature: The Critical Influence of H. P. Lovecraft. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95477-6_1. ISBN 978-3-319-95477-6.
- Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (1997). «Life After Lovecraft: Reminiscences of a Non-Entity». Mosig at Last: A Psychologist Looks at H.P. Lovecraft. West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. pp. 111–116. ISBN 978-0-940884-90-8. OCLC 681921217.
- Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (2001) [first published 1974]. «The Four Faces of the Outsider». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 17–34. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
- Murray, Will (October 1, 1986). «In Search of Arkham Country». Lovecraft Studies. 5 (2): 54–67. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Murray, Will (1991–1992). «Lovecraft’s Arkham Country». Books at Brown. 38–39: 19–29. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
- Nelson, Victoria (2012). «Cathedral Head: The Gothick Cosmos of Guillermo del Toro». Gothicka. Harvard University Press. pp. 219–237. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674065406.c10. ISBN 978-0-674-05014-3. JSTOR j.ctt24hj8c.13. S2CID 191845332.
- Norman, Joseph (2013). «‘Sounds Which Filled Me with an Indefinable Dread’: The Cthulhu Mythopoeia of H. P. Lovecraft in ‘Extreme’ Metal». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 193–208. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_11. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 192763998.
- Norris, Duncan (2018). «The Void: A Lovecraftian Analysis». Lovecraft Annual (12): 149–164. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868564.
- Norris, Duncan (2020). «Zeitgeist and Untoten: Lovecraft and the Walking Dead». Lovecraft Annual (14): 189–240. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26939817.
- «Notable Persons Interred at Swan Point Cemetery». Swan Point Cemetery. Archived from the original on January 22, 2016.
- Oates, Joyce Carol (October 31, 1996). «The King of Weird». The New York Review of Books. Vol. 43, no. 17. ISSN 0028-7504. Archived from the original on September 10, 2009.
- Peak, David (2020). «Horror of the Real: H.P. Lovecraft’s Old Ones and Contemporary Speculative Philosophy». In Rosen, Matt (ed.). Diseases of the Head: Essays on the Horrors of Speculative Philosophy. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. pp. 163–180. doi:10.2307/j.ctv19cwdpb.7. ISBN 978-1-953035-10-3. JSTOR j.ctv19cwdpb.7. OCLC 1227264756. S2CID 229019856.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2018). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Romantic on the Nightside». Lovecraft Annual (12): 165–173. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868565.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2019). ««Now Will You Be Good?»: Lovecraft, Teetotalism, and Philosophy». Lovecraft Annual (13): 119–144. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868581.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2017). «On Lovecraft’s Lifelong Relationship with Wonder». Lovecraft Annual (11): 23–36. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868530.
- Powell, Anna (2019). «Thinking the Thing: The Outer Reaches of Knowledge in Lovecraft and Deleuze». In Hogle, Jerrold E.; Miles, Robert (eds.). The Gothic and Theory: An Edinburgh Companion. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 260–278. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427777.003.0014. ISBN 978-1-4744-2777-7. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvggx38r.17. OCLC 1145928444. S2CID 213917604.
- Punter, David (1996). The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the Present Day. Vol. II. New York: Longman. ISBN 0-582-23714-9. OCLC 1072397754.
- Ransom, Amy J. (2015). «Lovecraft in Quebec: Transcultural Fertilization and Esther Rochon’s Reevaluation of the Powers of Horror». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 450–468. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321170. S2CID 165970090. ProQuest 1861072902.
- Rottensteiner, Franz (1992). «Lovecraft as Philosopher». Science Fiction Studies. 19 (1): 117–121. JSTOR 4240129.
- Rubinton, Noel (August 10, 2016). «How to Find the Spirit of H.P. Lovecraft in Providence». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. ProQuest 1810306270. Archived from the original on October 13, 2018.
- Sederholm, Carl H. (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft, Heavy Metal, and Cosmicism». Rock Music Studies. 3 (3): 266–280. doi:10.1080/19401159.2015.1121644. ISSN 1940-1159. S2CID 194537597.
- Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (2016). «Introduction: Lovecraft Rising». The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 1–42. ISBN 978-1-4529-5023-5. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.5. OCLC 945632985.
- Schoell, William (2004). H.P. Lovecraft: Master of Weird Fiction (First ed.). Greensboro, North Carolina: Morgan Reynolds. ISBN 1-931798-15-X. OCLC 903506614.
- Schultz, David E. (2018). «‘Whaddya Make Them Eyes at Me For?’: Lovecraft and Book Publishers». Lovecraft Annual (12): 51–65. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868555.
- Schweitzer, Darrell (2018). «Lovecraft, Aristeas, Dunsany, and the Dream Journey». Lovecraft Annual (12): 136–143. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868561.
- Schweitzer, Darrell (1998). Windows of the Imagination: Essays on Fantastic Literature. Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-60-2. OCLC 48566644. S2CID 190964524.
- Scott, Winfield Townley (December 26, 1943). «The Case of Howard Phillips Lovecraft of Providence, R.I.» The Providence Journal. p. 41. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved August 23, 2021 – via GenealogyBank.com.
- Siclen, Bill Van (August 16, 2015). «NecronomiCon Providence to celebrate life and work of H. P. Lovecraft». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Silva, Christianna (June 7, 2017). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Monster Is Wrapping Family Game Night Up In Tentacles». National Public Radio. Archived from the original on February 28, 2018.
- Smith, Andy (August 16, 2017). «NecronomiCon, homage to H. P. Lovecraft, returns to Providence». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Sperling, Alison (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Weird Body». Lovecraft Annual (10): 75–100. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868514.
- St. Armand, Barton Levi (1972). «Facts in the Case of H. P. Lovecraft» (PDF). Rhode Island History. 31 (1): 3–20. ISSN 0035-4619 – via Rhode Island Historical Society.
- St. Armand, Barton Levi (1975). «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent». Caliban. 12 (1): 127–155. doi:10.3406/calib.1975.1046. eISSN 2431-1766. S2CID 220649713.
- Steiner, Bernd (2005). H. P. Lovecraft and the Literature of the Fantastic: Explorations in a Literary Genre. Munich: GRIN Verlag. ISBN 978-3-638-84462-8. OCLC 724541939.
- Talbot, Nick (August 31, 2014). «All About Alienation: Alan Moore On Lovecraft And Providence». The Quietus.
- Tierney, Richard L. (2001) [first published 1972]. «The Derleth Mythos». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 52–53. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
- Touponce, William F. (2013). Lord Dunsany, H. P. Lovecraft, and Ray Bradbury: Spectral Journeys. Studies in Supernatural Literature. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-9220-0. OCLC 873404866.
- Vick, Todd B. (2021). Renegades and Rogues: The Life and Legacy of Robert E. Howard. Austin: University of Texas Press. doi:10.7560/321959. ISBN 978-1-4773-2195-9. OCLC 1159658615. S2CID 241275357.
- Wetzel, George T. (1983). The Lovecraft Scholar (PDF). Darien, Connecticut: Hobgoblin Press.
- Wilson, Colin (1975). The Strength to Dream: Literature and the Imagination (Second ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-8371-6819-7. OCLC 630646359.
- Wilson, Edmund (1950) [first published November 24, 1945]. «Tales of the Marvellous and the Ridiculous». Classics and Commercials: A Literary Chronicle of the Forties. New York: Macmillan. pp. 286–290. ISBN 0-374-52667-2. OCLC 964373.
- Wohleber, Curt (December 1995). «The Man Who Can Scare Stephen King». American Heritage. Vol. 46, no. 8. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
- Wolanin, Tyler L. (2013). «New Deal Politics in the Correspondence of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (7): 3–35. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868464.
- Woodard, Ben (2011). «Mad Speculation and Absolute Inhumanism: Lovecraft, Ligotti, and the Weirding of Philosophy». Continent. 1 (1): 3–13. doi:10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225. ISSN 2159-9920. S2CID 170136177.
- «Wrote of His Last Month Alive». The Boston Globe. March 15, 1937. p. 2. ISSN 0743-1791. Archived from the original on February 28, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Zeller, Benjamin E. (December 2019). «Altar Call of Cthulhu: Religion and Millennialism in H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos». Religions. 11 (1): 18. doi:10.3390/rel11010018. ISSN 2077-1444. S2CID 213736759.
Further reading
- Anderson, James Arthur; Joshi, S. T. (2011). Out of the Shadows: A Structuralist Approach to Understanding the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft. Rockville, Maryland: Wildside Press. doi:10.23860/diss-anderson-james-1992. ISBN 978-1-4794-0384-4. OCLC 1127558354. S2CID 171675509.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1983). H. P. Lovecraft: A Critical Study. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-23255-8. OCLC 299389026. S2CID 190394934.
- Callaghan, Gavin (2013). H. P. Lovecraft’s Dark Arcadia: The Satire, Symbology and Contradiction. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-1-4766-0239-4. OCLC 856844361.
- Cannon, Peter, ed. (1998). Lovecraft Remembered. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 978-0-87054-173-5. OCLC 260088015.
- Carter, Lin (1972). Lovecraft: A Look Behind the «Cthulhu Mythos». New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-586-04166-4. OCLC 2213597. S2CID 190363598.
- Frierson, Meade; Frierson, Penny (March 1972). HPL: A Tribute to Howard Phillips Lovecraft (PDF). Birmingham, Alabama: Meade and Penny Frierson. OCLC 315586.
- González Grueso, Fernando Darío (2017). La ficción científica. Género, Poética y sus relaciones con la literatura oral tradicional: El papel de H. P. Lovecraft como mediador. Colección Estudios (in Spanish). Madrid: UAM Ediciones. doi:10.15366/ficcion.cientif2013. ISBN 978-84-8344-376-7. OCLC 1026295184. S2CID 183258592.
- Hegyi, Pál (2019). Lovecraft Laughing: Uncanny Memes in the Weird. Department of American Studies, University of Szeged. doi:10.14232/americana.books.2019.hegyi.lovecraft. ISBN 978-615-5423-56-7. OCLC 8160851320. S2CID 192043054.
- Houellebecq, Michel; King, Stephen (2005). H. P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life. Translated by Khazeni, Dorna. Cernunnos. ISBN 1-932416-18-8. OCLC 1151841813. S2CID 190374730.
- Joshi, S. T. (1980). H. P. Lovecraft, Four Decades of Criticism (First ed.). Athens: Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-0442-3. OCLC 6085440.
- Klinger, Leslie S. (2014). The New Annotated H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-87140-453-4. OCLC 884500241. S2CID 218735034.
- Lévy, Maurice (1988) [first published 1972]. Lovecraft: A Study in the Fantastic. Translated by Joshi, S. T. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-1956-7. OCLC 491484555. S2CID 190967971.
- Long, Frank Belknap (1975). Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Dreamer on the Nightside. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-068-8. OCLC 2034623. S2CID 160306366.
- Ludueña, Fabián; de Acosta, Alejandro (2015). H. P. Lovecraft: The Disjunction in Being. Translated by de Acosta, Alejandro. United States: Schism. ISBN 978-1-5058-6600-1. OCLC 935704008.
- Lovecraft, H. P.; Conover, Willis; Joshi, S. T. (2002). Lovecraft at Last: The Master of Horror in His Own Words (Revised ed.). New York: Cooper Square Press. ISBN 0-8154-1212-6. OCLC 50212624.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1999). Joshi, S. T.; Cannon, Peter (eds.). More Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50875-4. OCLC 41231274.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1997). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50660-3. OCLC 36165172.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2012). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature (Second ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-1-61498-028-5. OCLC 855115722.
- Shapiro, Stephen; Philip, Barnard (2017). Pentecostal Modernism: Lovecraft, Los Angeles and World-Systems Culture. New Directions in Religion and Literature. Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781474238762. ISBN 978-1-4742-3873-1. OCLC 1065524061. S2CID 148868506.
- Martin, Sean Elliot (December 2008). H.P. Lovecraft and the Modernist Grotesque (PhD thesis). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University. ISBN 9781448610167. OCLC 601419113. S2CID 191576874.
- Migliore, Andrew; Strysik, John (2006). The Lurker in the Lobby: A Guide to the Cinema of H. P. Lovecraft. Portland, Oregon: Night Shade Books. ISBN 978-1-892389-35-0. OCLC 1023313647. S2CID 152612871.
- Montaclair, Florent; Picot, Jean-Pierre (1997). Fantastique et événement : Étude comparée des œuvres de Jules Verne et Howard P. Lovecraft. Annales littéraires (in French). Vol. 621. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté. doi:10.4000/books.pufc.1726. ISBN 978-2-84867-692-0. OCLC 1286480358. S2CID 228019349.
- Wilson, Eric (2016). The Republic of Cthulhu: Lovecraft, the Weird Tale, and Conspiracy Theory. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. doi:10.21983/P3.0155.1.00. ISBN 978-0-9982375-6-5. OCLC 1135348793. S2CID 165947887.
External links
- The H. P. Lovecraft Archive
- The H. P. Lovecraft Historical Society
- The Lovecraft Arts & Sciences Council, a non-profit educational organization
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Fantasy
- H. P. Lovecraft at IMDb
- H. P. Lovecraft discography at Discogs
Journals
- Lovecraft Annual
- Lovecraft Studies
- Crypt of Cthulhu
Library collections
- H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Special Collections at the John Hay Library (Brown University)
- H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Distinctive Collections of Falvey Memorial Library (Villanova University)
Online editions
- Works by Howard Phillips Lovecraft at Project Gutenberg
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft at Faded Page (Canada)
- Works by or about H. P. Lovecraft at Internet Archive
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft in eBook form at Standard Ebooks
H. P. Lovecraft |
|
---|---|
Lovecraft in 1934 |
|
Born | Howard Phillips Lovecraft August 20, 1890 Providence, Rhode Island, U.S. |
Died | March 15, 1937 (aged 46) Providence, Rhode Island, U.S. |
Resting place | Swan Point Cemetery, Providence 41°51′14″N 71°22′52″W / 41.854021°N 71.381068°W |
Pen name |
|
Occupation |
|
Genre | Lovecraftian horror, weird fiction, horror fiction, science fiction, gothic fiction, fantasy |
Literary movement |
|
Years active | 1917–1937 |
Notable works |
|
Spouse |
Sonia Greene (m. ) |
Signature | |
Howard Phillips Lovecraft (; August 20, 1890 – March 15, 1937) was an American writer of weird, science, fantasy, and horror fiction. He is best known for his creation of the Cthulhu Mythos.[a]
Born in Providence, Rhode Island, Lovecraft spent most of his life in New England. After his father’s institutionalization in 1893, he lived affluently until his family’s wealth dissipated after the death of his grandfather. Lovecraft then lived with his mother, in reduced financial security, until her institutionalization in 1919. He began to write essays for the United Amateur Press Association, and in 1913 wrote a critical letter to a pulp magazine that ultimately led to his involvement in pulp fiction. He became active in the speculative fiction community and was published in several pulp magazines. Lovecraft moved to New York City, marrying Sonia Greene in 1924, and later became the center of a wider group of authors known as the «Lovecraft Circle». They introduced him to Weird Tales, which would become his most prominent publisher. Lovecraft’s time in New York took a toll on his mental state and financial conditions. He returned to Providence in 1926 and produced some of his most popular works, including The Call of Cthulhu, At the Mountains of Madness, The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time. He would remain active as a writer for 11 years until his death from intestinal cancer at the age of 46.
Lovecraft’s literary corpus is based around the idea of cosmicism, which was simultaneously his personal philosophy and the main theme of his fiction. Cosmicism posits that humanity is an insignificant part of the cosmos, and could be swept away at any moment. He incorporated fantasy and science fiction elements into his stories, representing the perceived fragility of anthropocentrism. This was tied to his ambivalent views on knowledge. His works were largely set in a fictionalized version of New England. Civilizational decline also plays a major role in his works, as he believed that the West was in decline during his lifetime. Lovecraft’s early political opinions were conservative and traditionalist; additionally, he held a number of racist views for much of his adult life. Following the Great Depression, Lovecraft became a socialist, no longer believing a just aristocracy would make the world more fair.
Throughout his adult life, Lovecraft was never able to support himself from earnings as an author and editor. He was virtually unknown during his lifetime and was almost exclusively published in pulp magazines before his death. A scholarly revival of Lovecraft’s work began in the 1970s, and he is now regarded as one of the most significant 20th-century authors of supernatural horror fiction. Many direct adaptations and spiritual successors followed. Works inspired by Lovecraft, adaptations or original works, began to form the basis of the Cthulhu Mythos, which utilizes Lovecraft’s characters, setting, and themes.
Biography
Early life and family tragedies
Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892
Lovecraft was born in his family home on August 20, 1890, in Providence, Rhode Island. He was the only child of Winfield Scott Lovecraft and Sarah Susan (née Phillips) Lovecraft.[2] Susie’s family was of substantial means at the time of their marriage, as her father, Whipple Van Buren Phillips, was involved in business ventures.[3] In April 1893, after a psychotic episode in a Chicago hotel, Winfield was committed to Butler Hospital in Providence. His medical records state that he had been «doing and saying strange things at times» for a year before his commitment.[4] The person who reported these symptoms is unknown.[5] Winfield spent five years in Butler before dying in 1898. His death certificate listed the cause of death as general paresis, a term synonymous with late-stage syphilis.[6] Throughout his life, Lovecraft maintained that his father fell into a paralytic state, due to insomnia and overwork, and remained that way until his death. It is not known whether Lovecraft was simply kept ignorant of his father’s illness or whether his later statements were intentionally misleading.[7]
After his father’s institutionalization, Lovecraft resided in the family home with his mother, his maternal aunts Lillian and Annie, and his maternal grandparents Whipple and Robie.[8] According to family friends, his mother, known as Susie, doted on the young Lovecraft excessively, pampering him and never letting him out of her sight.[9] Lovecraft later recollected that his mother was «permanently stricken with grief» after his father’s illness. Whipple became a father figure to Lovecraft in this time, Lovecraft noting that his grandfather became the «centre of my entire universe». Whipple, who often traveled to manage his business, maintained correspondence by letter with the young Lovecraft who, by the age of three, was already proficient at reading and writing.[10]
Whipple encouraged the young Lovecraft to have an appreciation of literature, especially classical literature and English poetry. In his old age, he helped raise the young H. P. Lovecraft and educated him not only in the classics, but also in original weird tales of «winged horrors» and «deep, low, moaning sounds» which he created for his grandchild’s entertainment. The original sources of Phillips’ weird tales are unidentified. Lovecraft himself guessed that they originated from Gothic novelists like Ann Radcliffe, Matthew Lewis, and Charles Maturin.[11] It was during this period that Lovecraft was introduced to some of his earliest literary influences, such as The Rime of the Ancient Mariner illustrated by Gustave Doré, One Thousand and One Nights, Thomas Bulfinch’s Age of Fable, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses.[12]
While there is no indication that Lovecraft was particularly close to his grandmother Robie, her death in 1896 had a profound effect on him. By his own account, it sent his family into «a gloom from which it never fully recovered». His mother and aunts wore black mourning dresses that «terrified» him. This is also the time that Lovecraft, approximately five-and-a-half years old, started having nightmares that later would inform his fictional writings. Specifically, he began to have recurring nightmares of beings he referred to as «night-gaunts». He credited their appearance to the influence of Doré’s illustrations, which would «whirl me through space at a sickening rate of speed, the while fretting & impelling me with their detestable tridents.» Thirty years later, night-gaunts would appear in Lovecraft’s fiction.[13]
Lovecraft’s earliest known literary works were written at the age of seven, and were poems restyling the Odyssey and other Greco-Roman mythological stories.[14] Lovecraft would later write that during his childhood he was fixated on the Greco-Roman pantheon, and briefly accepted them as genuine expressions of divinity, foregoing his Christian upbringing.[15] He recalled, at five years old, being told Santa Claus did not exist and retorted by asking why «God is not equally a myth?»[16] At the age of eight, he took a keen interest in the sciences, particularly astronomy and chemistry. He also examined the anatomical books that were held in the family library, which taught him the specifics of human reproduction that were not yet explained to him. As a result, he found that it «virtually killed my interest in the subject.»[17]
In 1902, according to Lovecraft’s later correspondence, astronomy became a guiding influence on his worldview. He began publishing the periodical Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy, using the hectograph printing method.[18] Lovecraft went in and out of elementary school repeatedly, oftentimes with home tutors making up for the lost years, missing time due to health concerns that have not been determined. The written recollections of his peers described him as withdrawn but welcoming to those who shared his then-current fascination with astronomy, inviting them to look through his prized telescope.[19]
Education and financial decline
By 1900, Whipple’s various business concerns were suffering a downturn, which resulted in the slow erosion of his family’s wealth. He was forced to let his family’s hired servants go, leaving Lovecraft, Whipple, and Susie, being the only unmarried sister, alone in the family home.[20] In the spring of 1904, Whipple’s largest business venture suffered a catastrophic failure. Within months, he died at age 70 due to a stroke. After Whipple’s death, Susie was unable to financially support the upkeep of the expansive family home on what remained of the Phillips’ estate. Later that year, she was forced to move to a small duplex with her son.[21]
Whipple Van Buren Phillips
Lovecraft called this time one of the darkest of his life, remarking in a 1934 letter that he saw no point in living anymore; he considered the possibility of committing suicide. His scientific curiosity and desire to know more about the world prevented him from doing so.[22] In fall 1904, he entered high school. Much like his earlier school years, Lovecraft was periodically removed from school for long periods for what he termed «near breakdowns». He did say, though, that while having some conflicts with teachers, he enjoyed high school, becoming close with a small circle of friends. Lovecraft also performed well academically, excelling in particular at chemistry and physics.[23] Aside from a pause in 1904, he also resumed publishing the Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy as well as starting the Scientific Gazette, which dealt mostly with chemistry.[24] It was also during this period that Lovecraft produced the first of the fictional works that he would later be known for, namely «The Beast in the Cave» and «The Alchemist».[25]
It was in 1908, prior to what would have been his high school graduation, that Lovecraft suffered another unidentified health crisis, though this instance was more severe than his prior illnesses.[26] The exact circumstances and causes remain unknown. The only direct records are Lovecraft’s own correspondence wherein he retrospectively described it variously as a «nervous collapse» and «a sort of breakdown», in one letter blaming it on the stress of high school despite his enjoying it.[27] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, he notes, «I was and am prey to intense headaches, insomnia, and general nervous weakness which prevents my continuous application to any thing.»[26]
Though Lovecraft maintained that he was going to attend Brown University after high school, he never graduated and never attended school again. Whether Lovecraft suffered from a physical ailment, a mental one, or some combination thereof has never been determined. An account from a high school classmate described Lovecraft as exhibiting «terrible tics» and that at times «he’d be sitting in his seat and he’d suddenly up and jump». Harry Brobst, a psychology professor, examined the account and claimed that chorea minor was the probable cause of Lovecraft’s childhood symptoms, while noting that instances of chorea minor after adolescence are very rare.[27] In his letters, Lovecraft acknowledged that he suffered from bouts of chorea as a child.[28] Brobst further ventured that Lovecraft’s 1908 breakdown was attributed to a «hysteroid seizure», a term that has become synonymous with atypical depression.[29] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, Lovecraft stated that he «could hardly bear to see or speak to anyone, & liked to shut out the world by pulling down dark shades & using artificial light.»[30]
Earliest recognition
Few of Lovecraft and Susie’s activities between late 1908 and 1913 were recorded.[31] Lovecraft described the steady continuation of their financial decline highlighted by his uncle’s failed business that cost Susie a large portion of their already dwindling wealth.[32] One of Susie’s friends, Clara Hess, recalled a visit during which Susie spoke continuously about Lovecraft being «so hideous that he hid from everyone and did not like to walk upon the streets where people could gaze on him.» Despite Hess’ protests to the contrary, Susie maintained this stance.[33] For his part, Lovecraft said he found his mother to be «a positive marvel of consideration».[34] A next-door neighbor later pointed out that what others in the neighborhood often assumed were loud, nocturnal quarrels between mother and son, were actually recitations of Shakespeare, an activity that seemed to delight mother and son.[35]
During this period, Lovecraft revived his earlier scientific periodicals.[31] He endeavored to commit himself to the study of organic chemistry, Susie buying the expensive glass chemistry assemblage he wanted.[36] Lovecraft found his studies were stymied by the mathematics involved, which he found boring and would cause headaches that would incapacitate him for the remainder of the day.[37] Lovecraft’s first non-self-published poem appeared in a local newspaper in 1912. Called Providence in 2000 A.D., it envisioned a future where Americans of English descent were displaced by Irish, Italian, Portuguese, and Jewish immigrants.[38] In this period he also wrote racist poetry, including «New-England Fallen» and «On the Creation of Niggers», but there is no indication that either were published during his lifetime.[39]
In 1911, Lovecraft’s letters to editors began appearing in pulp and weird-fiction magazines, most notably Argosy.[40] A 1913 letter critical of Fred Jackson, one of Argosy’s more prominent writers, started Lovecraft down a path that would define the remainder of his career as a writer. In the following letters, Lovecraft described Jackson’s stories as being «trivial, effeminate, and, in places, coarse». Continuing, Lovecraft argued that Jackson’s characters exhibit the «delicate passions and emotions proper to negroes and anthropoid apes.»[41] This sparked a nearly year-long feud in the magazine’s letters section between the two writers and their respective supporters. Lovecraft’s most prominent opponent was John Russell, who often replied in verse, and to whom Lovecraft felt compelled to reply because he respected Russell’s writing skills.[42] The most immediate effect of this feud was the recognition garnered from Edward F. Daas, then head editor of the United Amateur Press Association (UAPA).[43] Daas invited Russell and Lovecraft to join the organization and both accepted, Lovecraft in April 1914.[44]
Rejuvenation and tragedy
With the advent of United I obtained a renewed will to live; a renewed sense of existence as other than a superfluous weight; and found a sphere in which I could feel that my efforts were not wholly futile. For the first time I could imagine that my clumsy gropings after art were a little more than faint cries lost in the unlistening void.
—Lovecraft in 1921.[45]
Lovecraft immersed himself in the world of amateur journalism for most of the following decade.[45] During this period, he advocated for amateurism’s superiority to commercialism.[46] Lovecraft defined commercialism as writing for what he considered low-brow publications for pay. This was contrasted with his view of «professional publication», which was what he called writing for what he considered respectable journals and publishers. He thought of amateur journalism as serving as practice for a professional career.[47]
Lovecraft was appointed chairman of the Department of Public Criticism of the UAPA in late 1914.[48] He used this position to advocate for what he saw as the superiority of archaic English language usage. Emblematic of the Anglophilic opinions he maintained throughout his life, he openly criticized other UAPA contributors for their «Americanisms» and «slang». Often, these criticisms were embedded in xenophobic and racist statements that the «national language» was being negatively changed by immigrants.[49] In mid-1915, Lovecraft was elected vice-president of the UAPA.[50] Two years later, he was elected president and appointed other board members who mostly shared his belief in the supremacy of British English over modern American English.[51] Another significant event of this time was the beginning of World War I. Lovecraft published multiple criticisms of the American government and public’s reluctance to join the war to protect England, which he viewed as America’s ancestral homeland.[52]
In 1916, Lovecraft published his first short story, «The Alchemist», in the main UAPA journal, which was a departure from his usual verse. Due to the encouragement of W. Paul Cook, another UAPA member and future lifelong friend, Lovecraft began writing and publishing more prose fiction.[53] Soon afterwards, he wrote «The Tomb» and «Dagon».[54] «The Tomb», by Lovecraft’s own admission, was greatly influenced by the style and structure of Edgar Allan Poe’s works.[55] Meanwhile, «Dagon» is considered Lovecraft’s first work that displays the concepts and themes that his writings would later become known for.[56] Lovecraft published another short story, «Beyond the Wall of Sleep» in 1919, which was his first science fiction story.[57]
Lovecraft’s term as president of the UAPA ended in 1918, and he returned to his former post as chairman of the Department of Public Criticism.[58] In 1917, as Lovecraft related to Kleiner, Lovecraft made an aborted attempt to enlist in the United States Army. Though he passed the physical exam,[59] he told Kleiner that his mother threatened to do anything, legal or otherwise, to prove that he was unfit for service.[60] After his failed attempt to serve in World War I, he attempted to enroll in the Rhode Island National Guard, but his mother used her family connections to prevent it.[61]
During the winter of 1918–1919, Susie, exhibiting the symptoms of a nervous breakdown, went to live with her elder sister, Lillian. The nature of Susie’s illness is unclear, as her medical papers were later destroyed in a fire at Butler Hospital.[62] Winfield Townley Scott, who was able to read the papers before the fire, described Susie as having suffered a psychological collapse.[62] Neighbour and friend Clara Hess, interviewed in 1948, recalled instances of Susie describing «weird and fantastic creatures that rushed out from behind buildings and from corners at dark.»[63] In the same account, Hess described a time when they crossed paths in downtown Providence and Susie was unaware of where she was.[63] In March 1919, she was committed to Butler Hospital, like her husband before her.[64] Lovecraft’s immediate reaction to Susie’s commitment was visceral, writing to Kleiner that «existence seems of little value», and that he wished «it might terminate».[65] During Susie’s time at Butler, Lovecraft periodically visited her and walked the large grounds with her.[66]
Late 1919 saw Lovecraft become more outgoing. After a period of isolation, he began joining friends in trips to writer gatherings; the first being a talk in Boston presented by Lord Dunsany, whom Lovecraft had recently discovered and idolized.[67] In early 1920, at an amateur writer convention, he met Frank Belknap Long, who would end up being Lovecraft’s most influential and closest confidant for the remainder of his life.[68] The influence of Dunsany is apparent in his 1919 output, which is part of what would be called Lovecraft’s Dream Cycle, including «The White Ship» and «The Doom That Came to Sarnath».[69] In early 1920, he wrote «The Cats of Ulthar» and «Celephaïs», which were also strongly influenced by Dunsany.[70]
It was later in 1920 that Lovecraft began publishing the earliest Cthulhu Mythos stories. The Cthulhu Mythos, a term coined by later authors, encompasses Lovecraft’s stories that share a commonality in the revelation of cosmic insignificance, initially realistic settings, and recurring entities and texts.[71] The prose poem «Nyarlathotep» and the short story «The Crawling Chaos», in collaboration with Winifred Virginia Jackson, were written in late 1920.[72] Following in early 1921 came «The Nameless City», the first story that falls definitively within the Cthulhu Mythos. In it is one of Lovecraft’s most enduring phrases, a couplet recited by Abdul Alhazred; «That is not dead which can eternal lie; And with strange aeons even death may die.»[73] In the same year, he also wrote «The Outsider», which has become one of Lovecraft’s most heavily analyzed, and differently interpreted, stories.[74] It has been variously interpreted as being autobiographical, an allegory of the psyche, a parody of the afterlife, a commentary on humanity’s place in the universe, and a critique of progress.[75]
On May 24, 1921, Susie died in Butler Hospital, due to complications from an operation on her gallbladder five days earlier.[76] Lovecraft’s initial reaction, expressed in a letter written nine days after Susie’s death, was a deep state of sadness that crippled him physically and emotionally. He again expressed a desire that his life might end.[77] Lovecraft’s later response was relief, as he had become able to live independently from his mother. His physical health also began to improve, although he was unaware of the exact cause.[78] Despite Lovecraft’s reaction, he continued to attend amateur journalist conventions. Lovecraft met his future wife, Sonia Greene, at one such convention in July.[79]
Marriage and New York
Lovecraft and Sonia Greene on July 5, 1921
Lovecraft’s aunts disapproved of his relationship with Sonia. Lovecraft and Greene married on March 3, 1924, and relocated to her Brooklyn apartment at 259 Parkside Avenue; she thought he needed to leave Providence to flourish and was willing to support him financially.[80] Greene, who had been married before, later said Lovecraft had performed satisfactorily as a lover, though she had to take the initiative in all aspects of the relationship. She attributed Lovecraft’s passive nature to a stultifying upbringing by his mother.[81] Lovecraft’s weight increased to 200 lb (91 kg) on his wife’s home cooking.[82]
He was enthralled by New York, and, in what was informally dubbed the Kalem Club, he acquired a group of encouraging intellectual and literary friends who urged him to submit stories to Weird Tales. Its editor, Edwin Baird, accepted many of Lovecraft’s stories for the ailing publication, including «Under the Pyramids», which was ghostwritten for Harry Houdini.[83] Established informally some years before Lovecraft arrived in New York, the core Kalem Club members were boys’ adventure novelist Henry Everett McNeil, the lawyer and anarchist writer James Ferdinand Morton Jr., and the poet Reinhardt Kleiner.[84]
On January 1, 1925, Sonia moved from Parkside to Cleveland in response to a job opportunity, and Lovecraft left for a small first-floor apartment on 169 Clinton Street «at the edge of Red Hook»—a location which came to discomfort him greatly.[85] Later that year, the Kalem Club’s four regular attendees were joined by Lovecraft along with his protégé Frank Belknap Long, bookseller George Willard Kirk, and Samuel Loveman.[86] Loveman was Jewish, but he and Lovecraft became close friends in spite of the latter’s antisemitic attitudes.[87] By the 1930s, writer and publisher Herman Charles Koenig would be one of the last to become involved with the Kalem Club.[88]
Not long after the marriage, Greene lost her business and her assets disappeared in a bank failure.[89] Lovecraft made efforts to support his wife through regular jobs, but his lack of previous work experience meant he lacked proven marketable skills.[90] The publisher of Weird Tales was attempting to make the loss-making magazine profitable and offered the job of editor to Lovecraft, who declined, citing his reluctance to relocate to Chicago on aesthetic grounds.[91] Baird was succeeded by Farnsworth Wright, whose writing Lovecraft had criticized. Lovecraft’s submissions were often rejected by Wright. This may have been partially due to censorship guidelines imposed in the aftermath of a Weird Tales story that hinted at necrophilia, although after Lovecraft’s death, Wright accepted many of the stories he had originally rejected.[92]
Sonia also became ill and immediately after recovering, relocated to Cincinnati, and then to Cleveland; her employment required constant travel.[93] Added to his feelings of failure in a city with a large immigrant population, Lovecraft’s single-room apartment was burgled, leaving him with only the clothes he was wearing.[94] In August 1925, he wrote «The Horror at Red Hook» and «He», in the latter of which the narrator says «My coming to New York had been a mistake; for whereas I had looked for poignant wonder and inspiration […] I had found instead only a sense of horror and oppression which threatened to master, paralyze, and annihilate me.»[95] This was an expression of his despair at being in New York.[96] It was at around this time he wrote the outline for «The Call of Cthulhu», with its theme of the insignificance of all humanity.[97] During this time, Lovecraft wrote «Supernatural Horror in Literature» on the eponymous subject. It later became one of the most influential essays on supernatural horror.[98] With a weekly allowance Greene sent, Lovecraft moved to a working-class area of Brooklyn Heights, where he resided in a tiny apartment. He had lost approximately 40 pounds (18 kg) of body weight by 1926, when he left for Providence.[99]
Return to Providence and death
Lovecraft’s final home, May 1933 until March 10, 1937
Back in Providence, Lovecraft lived with his aunts in a «spacious brown Victorian wooden house» at 10 Barnes Street until 1933.[100] He then moved to 66 Prospect Street, which would become his final home.[b][101] The period beginning after his return to Providence contains some of his most prominent works, including The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, «The Call of Cthulhu» and The Shadow over Innsmouth.[102] The former two stories are partially autobiographical, as scholars have argued that The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath is about Lovecraft’s return to Providence and The Case of Charles Dexter Ward is, in part, about the city itself.[103] The former story also represents a partial repudiation of Dunsany’s influence, as Lovecraft had decided that his style did not come to him naturally.[104] At this time, he frequently revised work for other authors and did a large amount of ghostwriting, including The Mound, «Winged Death», and «The Diary of Alonzo Typer». Client Harry Houdini was laudatory, and attempted to help Lovecraft by introducing him to the head of a newspaper syndicate. Plans for a further project were ended by Houdini’s death in 1926.[105] After returning, he also began to engage in antiquarian travels across the eastern seaboard during the summer months.[106] During the spring–summer of 1930, Lovecraft visited, among other locations, New York City, Brattleboro, Vermont, Wilbraham, Massachusetts, Charleston, South Carolina, and Quebec City.[c][108]
Later, in August, Robert E. Howard wrote a letter to Weird Tales praising a then-recent reprint of H. P. Lovecraft’s «The Rats in the Walls» and discussing some of the Gaelic references used within.[109] Editor Farnsworth Wright forwarded the letter to Lovecraft, who responded positively to Howard, and soon the two writers were engaged in a vigorous correspondence that would last for the rest of Howard’s life.[110] Howard quickly became a member of the Lovecraft Circle, a group of writers and friends all linked through Lovecraft’s voluminous correspondence, as he introduced his many like-minded friends to one another and encouraged them to share their stories, utilize each other’s fictional creations, and help each other succeed in the field of pulp fiction.[111]
Meanwhile, Lovecraft was increasingly producing work that brought him no remuneration.[112] Affecting a calm indifference to the reception of his works, Lovecraft was in reality extremely sensitive to criticism and easily precipitated into withdrawal. He was known to give up trying to sell a story after it had been once rejected.[113] Sometimes, as with The Shadow over Innsmouth, he wrote a story that might have been commercially viable but did not try to sell it. Lovecraft even ignored interested publishers. He failed to reply when one inquired about any novel Lovecraft might have ready: although he had completed such a work, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, it was never typed up.[114] A few years after Lovecraft had moved to Providence, he and his wife Sonia Greene, having lived separately for so long, agreed to an amicable divorce. Greene moved to California in 1933 and remarried in 1936, unaware that Lovecraft, despite his assurances to the contrary, had never officially signed the final decree.[115]
As a result of the Great Depression, he shifted towards socialism, decrying both his prior political beliefs and the rising tide of fascism.[116] He thought that socialism was a workable middle ground between what he saw as the destructive impulses of both the capitalists and the Marxists of his day. This was based in a general opposition to cultural upheaval, as well as support for an ordered society. Electorally, he supported Franklin D. Roosevelt, but he thought that the New Deal was not sufficiently leftist. Lovecraft’s support for it was based in his view that no other set of reforms were possible at that time.[117]
H. P. Lovecraft’s gravestone
In late 1936, he witnessed the publication of The Shadow over Innsmouth as a paperback book.[d] 400 copies were printed, and the work was advertised in Weird Tales and several fan magazines. However, Lovecraft was displeased, as this book was riddled with errors that required extensive editing. It sold slowly and only approximately 200 copies were bound. The remaining 200 copies were destroyed after the publisher went out of business for the next seven years. By this point, Lovecraft’s literary career was reaching its end. Shortly after having written his last original short story, «The Haunter of the Dark», he stated that the hostile reception of At the Mountains of Madness had done «more than anything to end my effective fictional career». His declining psychological and physical states made it impossible for him to continue writing fiction.[120]
On June 11, Robert E. Howard was informed that his chronically ill mother would not awaken from her coma. He walked out to his car and committed suicide with a pistol that he had stored there. His mother died shortly thereafter.[121] This deeply affected Lovecraft, who consoled Howard’s father through correspondence. Almost immediately after hearing about Howard’s death, Lovecraft wrote a brief memoir titled «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard», which he distributed to his correspondents.[122] Meanwhile, Lovecraft’s physical health was deteriorating. He was suffering from an affliction that he referred to as «grippe».[e][124]
Due to his fear of doctors, Lovecraft was not examined until a month before his death. After seeing a doctor, he was diagnosed with terminal cancer of the small intestine.[125] He remained hospitalized until he died. He lived in constant pain until his death on March 15, 1937, in Providence. In accordance with his lifelong scientific curiosity, he kept a diary of his illness until he was physically incapable of holding a pen.[126] Lovecraft was listed along with his parents on the Phillips family monument.[127] In 1977, fans erected a headstone in Swan Point Cemetery on which they inscribed his name, the dates of his birth and death, and the phrase «I AM PROVIDENCE»—a line from one of his personal letters.[128]
Personal views
Politics
H. P. Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman by Virgil Finlay
Lovecraft began his life as a Tory,[129] which was likely the result of his conservative upbringing. His family supported the Republican Party for the entirety of his life. While it is unclear how consistently he voted, he voted for Herbert Hoover in the 1928 presidential election.[130] Rhode Island as a whole remained politically conservative and Republican into the 1930s.[131] Lovecraft himself was an Anglophile who supported the British monarchy. He opposed democracy and thought that the United States should be governed by an aristocracy. This viewpoint emerged during his youth and lasted until the end of the 1920s.[132] During World War I, his Anglophilia caused him to strongly support the entente against the Central Powers. Many of his earlier poems were devoted to then-current political subjects, and he published several political essays in his amateur journal, The Conservative.[133] He was a teetotaler who supported the implementation of Prohibition, which was one of the few reforms that he supported during the early part of his life.[134] While remaining a teetotaller, he later became convinced that Prohibition was ineffectual in the 1930s.[135] His personal justification for his early political viewpoints was primarily based on tradition and aesthetics.[136]
As a result of the Great Depression, Lovecraft reexamined his political views.[137] Initially, he thought that affluent people would take on the characteristics of his ideal aristocracy and solve America’s problems. When this did not occur, he became a socialist. This shift was caused by his observation that the Depression was harming American society. It was also influenced by the increase in socialism’s political capital during the 1930s. One of the main points of Lovecraft’s socialism was its opposition to Soviet Marxism, as he thought that a Marxist revolution would bring about the destruction of American civilization. Lovecraft thought that an intellectual aristocracy needed to be formed to preserve America.[138] His ideal political system is outlined in his 1933 essay «Some Repetitions on the Times». Lovecraft used this essay to echo the political proposals that had been made over the course of the last few decades. In this essay, he advocates governmental control of resource distribution, fewer working hours and a higher wage, and unemployment insurance and old age pensions. He also outlines the need for an oligarchy of intellectuals. In his view, power must be restricted to those who are sufficiently intelligent and educated.[139] He frequently used the term «fascism» to describe this form of government, but, according to S. T. Joshi, it bears little resemblance to that ideology.[140]
Lovecraft had varied views on the political figures of his day. He was an ardent supporter of Franklin D. Roosevelt.[141] He saw that Roosevelt was trying to steer a middle course between the conservatives and the revolutionaries, which he approved of. While he thought that Roosevelt should have been enacting more progressive policies, he came to the conclusion that the New Deal was the only realistic option for reform. He thought that voting for his opponents on the political left would be a wasted effort.[142] Internationally, like many Americans, he initially expressed support for Adolf Hitler. More specifically, he thought that Hitler would preserve German culture. However, he thought that Hitler’s racial policies should be based on culture rather than descent. There is evidence that, at the end of his life, Lovecraft began to oppose Hitler. According to Harry K. Brobst, Lovecraft’s downstairs neighbor went to Germany and witnessed Jews being beaten. Lovecraft and his aunt were angered by this. His discussions of Hitler drop off after this point.[143]
Atheism
Lovecraft was an atheist. His viewpoints on religion are outlined in his 1922 essay «A Confession of Unfaith». In this essay, he describes his shift away from the Protestantism of his parents to the atheism of his adulthood. Lovecraft was raised by a conservative Protestant family. He was introduced to the Bible and the mythos of Saint Nicholas when he was two. He passively accepted both of them. Over the course of the next few years, he was introduced to Grimms’ Fairy Tales and One Thousand and One Nights, favoring the latter. In response, Lovecraft took on the identity of «Abdul Alhazred», a name he would later use for the author of the Necronomicon.[144] Lovecraft experienced a brief period as a Greco-Roman pagan shortly thereafter.[145] According to this account, his first moment of skepticism occurred before his fifth birthday, when he questioned if God is a myth after learning that Santa Claus is not real. In 1896, he was introduced to Greco-Roman myths and became «a genuine pagan».[15]
This came to an end in 1902, when Lovecraft was introduced to space. He later described this event as the most poignant in his life. In response to this discovery, Lovecraft took to studying astronomy and described his observations in the local newspaper.[146] Before his thirteenth birthday, he had become convinced of humanity’s impermanence. By the time he was seventeen, he had read detailed writings that agreed with his worldview. Lovecraft ceased writing positively about progress, instead developing his later cosmic philosophy. Despite his interests in science, he had an aversion to realistic literature, so he became interested in fantastical fiction. Lovecraft became pessimistic when he entered amateur journalism in 1914. The Great War seemed to confirm his viewpoints. He began to despise philosophical idealism. Lovecraft took to discussing and debating his pessimism with his peers, which allowed him to solidify his philosophy. His readings of Friedrich Nietzsche and H. L. Mencken, among other pessimistic writers, furthered this development. At the end of his essay, Lovecraft states that all he desired was oblivion. He was willing to cast aside any illusion that he may still have held.[147]
Race
Race is the most controversial aspect of Lovecraft’s legacy, expressed in many disparaging remarks against non-Anglo-Saxon races and cultures in his works. Scholars have argued that these racial attitudes were common in the American society of his day, particularly in New England.[148] As he grew older, his original racial worldview became a classism or elitism, which regarded the superior race to include all those self-ennobled through high culture. From the start, Lovecraft did not hold all white people in uniform high regard, but rather esteemed English people and those of English descent.[149] In his early published essays, private letters and personal utterances, he argued for a strong color line to preserve race and culture.[150] His arguments were supported using disparagements of various races in his journalism and letters, and allegorically in his fictional works that depict non-human races.[151] This is evident in his portrayal of the Deep Ones in The Shadow over Innsmouth. Their interbreeding with humanity is framed as being a type of miscegenation that corrupts both the town of Innsmouth and the protagonist.[152]
Initially, Lovecraft showed sympathy to minorities who adopted Western culture, even to the extent of marrying a Jewish woman he viewed as being «well assimilated».[153] By the 1930s, Lovecraft’s views on ethnicity and race had moderated.[154] He supported ethnicities’ preserving their native cultures; for example, he thought that «a real friend of civilisation wishes merely to make the Germans more German, the French more French, the Spaniards more Spanish, & so on.»[155] This represented a shift from his previous support for cultural assimilation. His shift was partially the result of his exposure to different cultures through his travels and circle. The former resulted in him writing positively about Québécois and First Nations cultural traditions in his travelogue of Quebec.[156] However, this did not represent a complete elimination of his racial prejudices.[157]
Influences
Lovecraft was influenced by Edgar Allan Poe and Lord Dunsany.
His interest in weird fiction began in his childhood when his grandfather, who preferred Gothic stories, would tell him stories of his own design.[12] Lovecraft’s childhood home on Angell Street had a large library that contained classical literature, scientific works, and early weird fiction. At the age of five, Lovecraft enjoyed reading One Thousand and One Nights, and was reading Nathaniel Hawthorne a year later.[158] He was also influenced by the travel literature of John Mandeville and Marco Polo.[159] This led to his discovery of gaps in then-contemporary science, which prevented Lovecraft from committing suicide in response to the death of his grandfather and his family’s declining financial situation during his adolescence.[159] These travelogues may have also had an influence on how Lovecraft’s later works describe their characters and locations. For example, there is a resemblance between the powers of the Tibetan enchanters in The Travels of Marco Polo and the powers unleashed on Sentinel Hill in «The Dunwich Horror».[159]
One of Lovecraft’s most significant literary influences was Edgar Allan Poe, whom he described as his «God of Fiction».[160] Poe’s fiction was introduced to Lovecraft when the latter was eight years old. His earlier works were significantly influenced by Poe’s prose and writing style.[161] He also made extensive use of Poe’s unity of effect in his fiction.[162] Furthermore, At the Mountains of Madness directly quotes Poe and was influenced by The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket.[163] One of the main themes of the two stories is to discuss the unreliable nature of language as a method of expressing meaning.[164] In 1919, Lovecraft’s discovery of the stories of Lord Dunsany moved his writing in a new direction, resulting in a series of fantasies. Throughout his life, Lovecraft referred to Dunsany as the author who had the greatest impact on his literary career. The initial result of this influence was the Dream Cycle, a series of fantasies that originally take place in prehistory, but later shift to a dreamworld setting.[165] By 1930, Lovecraft decided that he would no longer write Dunsanian fantasies, arguing that the style did not come naturally to him.[166] Additionally, he also read and cited Arthur Machen and Algernon Blackwood as influences in the 1920s.[167]
Aside from horror authors, Lovecraft was significantly influenced by the Decadents, the Puritans, and the Aesthetic movement.[168] In «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent», Barton Levi St. Armand, a professor emeritus of English and American studies at Brown University, has argued that these three influences combined to define Lovecraft as a writer.[169] He traces this influence to both Lovecraft’s stories and letters, noting that he actively cultivated the image of a New England gentleman in his letters.[168] Meanwhile, his influence from the Decadents and the Aesthetic Movement stems from his readings of Edgar Allan Poe. Lovecraft’s aesthetic worldview and fixation on decline stems from these readings. The idea of cosmic decline is described as having been Lovecraft’s response to both the Aesthetic Movement and the 19th century Decadents.[170] St. Armand describes it as being a combination of non-theological Puritan thought and the Decadent worldview.[171] This is used as a division in his stories, particularly in «The Horror at Red Hook», «Pickman’s Model», and «The Music of Erich Zann». The division between Puritanism and Decadence, St. Armand argues, represents a polarization between an artificial paradise and oneiriscopic visions of different worlds.[172]
A non-literary inspiration came from then-contemporary scientific advances in biology, astronomy, geology, and physics.[173] Lovecraft’s study of science contributed to his view of the human race as insignificant, powerless, and doomed in a materialistic and mechanistic universe.[174] Lovecraft was a keen amateur astronomer from his youth, often visiting the Ladd Observatory in Providence, and penning numerous astronomical articles for his personal journal and local newspapers.[175] Lovecraft’s materialist views led him to espouse his philosophical views through his fiction; these philosophical views came to be called cosmicism. Cosmicism took on a more pessimistic tone with his creation of what is now known as the Cthulhu Mythos, a fictional universe that contains alien deities and horrors. The term «Cthulhu Mythos» was likely coined by later writers after Lovecraft’s death.[1] In his letters, Lovecraft jokingly called his fictional mythology «Yog-Sothothery».[176]
Dreams had a major role in Lovecraft’s literary career.[177] In 1991, as a result of his rising place in American literature, it was popularly thought that Lovecraft extensively transcribed his dreams when writing fiction. However, the majority of his stories are not transcribed dreams. Instead, many of them are directly influenced by dreams and dreamlike phenomena. In his letters, Lovecraft frequently compared his characters to dreamers. They are described as being as helpless as a real dreamer who is experiencing a nightmare. His stories also have dreamlike qualities. The Randolph Carter stories deconstruct the division between dreams and reality. The dreamlands in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath are a shared dreamworld that can be accessed by a sensitive dreamer. Meanwhile, in «The Silver Key», Lovecraft mentions the concept of «inward dreams», which implies the existence of outward dreams. Burleson compares this deconstruction to Carl Jung’s argument that dreams are the source of archetypal myths. Lovecraft’s way of writing fiction required both a level of realism and dreamlike elements. Citing Jung, Burleson argues that a writer may create realism by being inspired by dreams.[178]
Themes
Now all my tales are based on the fundamental premise that common human laws and interests and emotions have no validity or significance in the vast cosmos-at-large. To me there is nothing but puerility in a tale in which the human form—and the local human passions and conditions and standards—are depicted as native to other worlds or other universes. To achieve the essence of real externality, whether of time or space or dimension, one must forget that such things as organic life, good and evil, love and hate, and all such local attributes of a negligible and temporary race called mankind, have any existence at all. Only the human scenes and characters must have human qualities. These must be handled with unsparing realism, (not catch-penny romanticism) but when we cross the line to the boundless and hideous unknown—the shadow-haunted Outside—we must remember to leave our humanity and terrestrialism at the threshold.
— H. P. Lovecraft, in note to the editor of Weird Tales, on resubmission of «The Call of Cthulhu»[179]
Cosmicism
The central theme of Lovecraft’s corpus is cosmicism. Cosmicism is a literary philosophy that argues that humanity is an insignificant force in the universe. Despite appearing pessimistic, Lovecraft thought of himself being as being a cosmic indifferentist, which is expressed in his fiction. In it, human beings are often subject to powerful beings and other cosmic forces, but these forces are not so much malevolent as they are indifferent toward humanity. He believed in a meaningless, mechanical, and uncaring universe that human beings could never fully understand. There is no allowance for beliefs that could not be supported scientifically.[180] Lovecraft first articulated this philosophy in 1921, but he did not fully incorporate it into his fiction until five years later. «Dagon», «Beyond the Wall of Sleep», and «The Temple» contain early depictions of this concept, but the majority of his early tales do not analyze the concept. «Nyarlathotep» interprets the collapse of human civilization as being a corollary to the collapse of the universe. «The Call of Cthulhu» represents an intensification of this theme. In it, Lovecraft introduces the idea of alien influences on humanity, which would come to dominate all subsequent works.[181] In these works, Lovecraft expresses cosmicism through the usage of confirmation rather than revelation. Lovecraftian protagonists do not learn that they are insignificant. Instead, they already know it and have it confirmed to them through an event.[182]
Knowledge
Lovecraft’s fiction reflects his own ambivalent views regarding the nature of knowledge.[183] This expresses itself in the concept of forbidden knowledge. In Lovecraft’s stories, happiness is only achievable through blissful ignorance. Trying to know things that are not meant to be known leads to harm and psychological danger. This concept intersects with several other ideas. This includes the idea that the visible reality is an illusion masking the horrific true reality. Similarly, there are also intersections with the concepts of ancient civilizations that exert a malign influence on humanity and the general philosophy of cosmicism.[184] According to Lovecraft, self-knowledge can bring ruin to those who seek it. Those seekers would become aware of their own insignificance in the wider cosmos and would be unable to bear the weight of this knowledge. Lovecraftian horror is not achieved through external phenomenon. Instead, it is reached through the internalized psychological impact that knowledge has on its protagonists. «The Call of Cthulhu», The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time feature protagonists who experience both external and internal horror through the acquisition of self-knowledge.[185] The Case of Charles Dexter Ward also reflects this. One of its central themes is the danger of knowing too much about one’s family history. Charles Dexter Ward, the protagonist, engages in historical and genealogical research that ultimately leads to both madness and his own self-destruction.[186]
Decline of civilization
For much of his life, Lovecraft was fixated on the concepts of decline and decadence. More specifically, he thought that the West was in a state of terminal decline.[187] Starting in the 1920s, Lovecraft became familiar with the work of the German conservative-revolutionary theorist Oswald Spengler, whose pessimistic thesis of the decadence of the modern West formed a crucial element in Lovecraft’s overall anti-modern worldview.[188] Spenglerian imagery of cyclical decay is a central theme in At the Mountains of Madness. S. T. Joshi, in H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West, places Spengler at the center of his discussion of Lovecraft’s political and philosophical ideas. According to him, the idea of decline is the single idea that permeates and connects his personal philosophy. The main Spenglerian influence on Lovecraft would be his view that politics, economics, science, and art are all interdependent aspects of civilization. This realization led him to shed his personal ignorance of then-current political and economic developments after 1927.[189] Lovecraft had developed his idea of Western decline independently, but Spengler gave it a clear framework.[190]
Science
Lovecraft shifted supernatural horror away from its previous focus on human issues to a focus on cosmic ones. In this way, he merged the elements of supernatural fiction that he deemed to be scientifically viable with science fiction. This merge required an understanding of both supernatural horror and then-contemporary science.[191] Lovecraft used this combined knowledge to create stories that extensively reference trends in scientific development. Beginning with «The Shunned House», Lovecraft increasingly incorporated elements of both Einsteinian science and his own personal materialism into his stories. This intensified with the writing of «The Call of Cthulhu», where he depicted alien influences on humanity. This trend would continue throughout the remainder of his literary career. «The Colour Out of Space» represents what scholars have called the peak of this trend. It portrays an alien lifeform whose otherness prevents it from being defined by then-contemporary science.[192]
Another part of this effort was the repeated usage of mathematics in an effort to make his creatures and settings appear more alien. Tom Hull, a mathematician, regards this as enhancing his ability to invoke a sense of otherness and fear. He attributes this use of mathematics to Lovecraft’s childhood interest in astronomy and his adulthood awareness of non-Euclidean geometry.[193] Another reason for his use of mathematics was his reaction to the scientific developments of his day. These developments convinced him that humanity’s primary means of understanding the world was no longer trustable. Lovecraft’s usage of mathematics in his fiction serves to convert otherwise supernatural elements into things that have in-universe scientific explanations. «The Dreams in the Witch House» and The Shadow Out of Time both have elements of this. The former uses a witch and her familiar, while the latter uses the idea of mind transference. These elements are explained using scientific theories that were prevalent during Lovecraft’s lifetime.[194]
Lovecraft Country
Setting plays a major role in Lovecraft’s fiction. Lovecraft Country, a fictionalized version of New England, serves as the central hub for his mythos. It represents the history, culture, and folklore of the region, as interpreted by Lovecraft. These attributes are exaggerated and altered to provide a suitable setting for his stories. The names of the locations in the region were directly influenced by the names of real locations in the region, which was done to increase their realism.[195] Lovecraft’s stories use their connections with New England to imbue themselves with the ability to instill fear.[196] Lovecraft was primarily inspired by the cities and towns in Massachusetts. However, the specific location of Lovecraft Country is variable, as it moved according to Lovecraft’s literary needs. Starting with areas that he thought were evocative, Lovecraft redefined and exaggerated them under fictional names. For example, Lovecraft based Arkham on the town of Oakham and expanded it to include a nearby landmark.[197] Its location was moved, as Lovecraft decided that it would have been destroyed by the recently-built Quabbin Reservoir. This is alluded to in «The Colour Out of Space», as the «blasted heath» is submerged by the creation of a fictionalized version of the reservoir.[198] Similarly, Lovecraft’s other towns were based on other locations in Massachusetts. Innsmouth was based on Newburyport, and Dunwich was based on Greenwich. The vague locations of these towns also played into Lovecraft’s desire to create a mood in his stories. In his view, a mood can only be evoked through reading.[199]
Critical reception
Literary
Early efforts to revise an established literary view of Lovecraft as an author of ‘pulp’ were resisted by some eminent critics; in 1945, Edmund Wilson sneered: «the only real horror in most of these fictions is the horror of bad taste and bad art.» However, Wilson praised Lovecraft’s ability to write about his chosen field; he described him as having written about it «with much intelligence».[200] According to L. Sprague de Camp, Wilson later improved his opinion of Lovecraft, citing a report of David Chavchavadze that Wilson had included a Lovecraftian reference in Little Blue Light: A Play in Three Acts. After Chavchavadze met with him to discuss this, Wilson revealed that he had been reading a copy of Lovecraft’s correspondence.[f][202] Two years before Wilson’s critique, Lovecraft’s works were reviewed by Winfield Townley Scott, the literary editor of The Providence Journal. He argued that Lovecraft was one of the most significant Rhode Island authors and that it was regrettable that he had received little attention from mainstream critics at the time.[203] Mystery and Adventure columnist Will Cuppy of the New York Herald Tribune recommended to readers a volume of Lovecraft’s stories in 1944, asserting that «the literature of horror and macabre fantasy belongs with mystery in its broader sense.»[204]
By 1957, Floyd C. Gale of Galaxy Science Fiction said that Lovecraft was comparable to Robert E. Howard, stating that «they appear more prolific than ever,» noting L. Sprague de Camp, Björn Nyberg, and August Derleth’s usage of their creations.[205] Gale also said that «Lovecraft at his best could build a mood of horror unsurpassed; at his worst, he was laughable.»[205] In 1962, Colin Wilson, in his survey of anti-realist trends in fiction The Strength to Dream, cited Lovecraft as one of the pioneers of the «assault on rationality» and included him with M. R. James, H. G. Wells, Aldous Huxley, J. R. R. Tolkien and others as one of the builders of mythicised realities contending against what he considered the failing project of literary realism.[206] Subsequently, Lovecraft began to acquire the status of a cult writer in the counterculture of the 1960s, and reprints of his work proliferated.[207]
Michael Dirda, a reviewer for The Times Literary Supplement, has described Lovecraft as being a «visionary» who is «rightly regarded as second only to Edgar Allan Poe in the annals of American supernatural literature.» According to him, Lovecraft’s works prove that mankind cannot bear the weight of reality, as the true nature of reality cannot be understood by either science or history. In addition, Dirda praises Lovecraft’s ability to create an uncanny atmosphere. This atmosphere is created through the feeling of wrongness that pervades the objects, places, and people in Lovecraft’s works. He also comments favorably on Lovecraft’s correspondence, and compares him to Horace Walpole. Particular attention is given to his correspondence with August Derleth and Robert E. Howard. The Derleth letters are called «delightful», while the Howard letters are described as being an ideological debate. Overall, Dirda believes that Lovecraft’s letters are equal to, or better than, his fictional output.[208]
Los Angeles Review of Books reviewer Nick Mamatas has stated that Lovecraft was a particularly difficult author, rather than a bad one. He described Lovecraft as being «perfectly capable» in the fields of story logic, pacing, innovation, and generating quotable phrases. However, Lovecraft’s difficulty made him ill-suited to the pulps; he was unable to compete with the popular recurring protagonists and damsel-in-distress stories. Furthermore, he compared a paragraph from The Shadow Out of Time to a paragraph from the introduction to The Economic Consequences of the Peace. In Mamatas’ view, Lovecraft’s quality is obscured by his difficulty, and his skill is what has allowed his following to outlive the followings of other then-prominent authors, such as Seabury Quinn and Kenneth Patchen.[209]
In 2005, the Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works. This volume was reviewed by many publications, including The New York Times Book Review and The Wall Street Journal, and sold 25,000 copies within a month of release. The overall critical reception of the volume was mixed.[210] Several scholars, including S. T. Joshi and Alison Sperling, have said that this confirms H. P. Lovecraft’s place in the western canon.[211] The editors of The Age of Lovecraft, Carl H. Sederholm and Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, attributed the rise of mainstream popular and academic interest in Lovecraft to this volume, along with the Penguin Classics volumes and the Modern Library edition of At the Mountains of Madness. These volumes led to a proliferation of other volumes containing Lovecraft’s works. According to the two authors, these volumes are part of a trend in Lovecraft’s popular and academic reception: increased attention by one audience causes the other to also become more interested. Lovecraft’s success is, in part, the result of his success.[212]
Lovecraft’s style has often been subject to criticism,[213] but scholars such as S. T. Joshi have argued that Lovecraft consciously utilized a variety of literary devices to form a unique style of his own—these include prose-poetic rhythm, stream of consciousness, alliteration, and conscious archaism.[214] According to Joyce Carol Oates, Lovecraft and Edgar Allan Poe have exerted a significant influence on later writers in the horror genre.[215] Horror author Stephen King called Lovecraft «the twentieth century’s greatest practitioner of the classic horror tale.»[216] King stated in his semi-autobiographical non-fiction book Danse Macabre that Lovecraft was responsible for his own fascination with horror and the macabre and was the largest influence on his writing.[217]
Philosophical
H. P. Lovecraft’s writings have influenced the speculative realist philosophical movement during the early twentieth-first century. The four founders of the movement, Ray Brassier, Iain Hamilton Grant, Graham Harman, and Quentin Meillassoux, have cited Lovecraft as an inspiration for their worldviews.[218] Graham Harman wrote a monograph, Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy, about Lovecraft and philosophy. In it, he argues that Lovecraft was a «productionist» author. He describes Lovecraft as having been an author who was uniquely obsessed with gaps in human knowledge.[219] He goes further and asserts Lovecraft’s personal philosophy as being in opposition to both idealism and David Hume. In his view, Lovecraft resembles Georges Braque, Pablo Picasso, and Edmund Husserl in his division of objects into different parts that do not exhaust the potential meanings of the whole. The anti-idealism of Lovecraft is represented through his commentary on the inability of language to describe his horrors.[220] Harman also credits Lovecraft with inspiring parts of his own articulation of object-oriented ontology.[221] According to Lovecraft scholar Alison Sperling, this philosophical interpretation of Lovecraft’s fiction has caused other philosophers in Harmon’s tradition to write about Lovecraft. These philosophers seek to remove human perception and human life from the foundations of ethics. These scholars have used Lovecraft’s works as the central example of their worldview. They base this usage in Lovecraft’s arguments against anthropocentrism and the ability of the human mind to truly understand the universe. They have also played a role in Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation by focusing on his interpretation of ontology, which gives him a central position in Anthropocene studies.[222]
Legacy
H. P. Lovecraft memorial plaque at 22 Prospect Street in Providence. Portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.
Lovecraft was relatively unknown during his lifetime. While his stories appeared in prominent pulp magazines such as Weird Tales, not many people knew his name.[223] He did, however, correspond regularly with other contemporary writers such as Clark Ashton Smith and August Derleth,[224] who became his friends, even though he never met them in person. This group became known as the «Lovecraft Circle», since their writings freely borrowed Lovecraft’s motifs, with his encouragement. He borrowed from them as well. For example, he made use of Clark Ashton Smith’s Tsathoggua in The Mound.[225]
After Lovecraft’s death, the Lovecraft Circle carried on. August Derleth founded Arkham House with Donald Wandrei to preserve Lovecraft’s works and keep them in print.[226] He added to and expanded on Lovecraft’s vision, not without controversy.[227] While Lovecraft considered his pantheon of alien gods a mere plot device, Derleth created an entire cosmology, complete with a war between the good Elder Gods and the evil Outer Gods, such as Cthulhu and his ilk. The forces of good were supposed to have won, locking Cthulhu and others beneath the earth, the ocean, and elsewhere. Derleth’s Cthulhu Mythos stories went on to associate different gods with the traditional four elements of fire, air, earth, and water, which did not line up with Lovecraft’s original vision of his mythos. However, Derleth’s ownership of Arkham House gave him a position of authority in Lovecraftiana that would not dissipate until his death, and through the efforts of Lovecraft scholars in the 1970s.[228]
Lovecraft’s works have influenced many writers and other creators. Stephen King has cited Lovecraft as a major influence on his works. As a child in the 1960s, he came across a volume of Lovecraft’s works which inspired him to write his fiction. He goes on to argue that all works in the horror genre that were written after Lovecraft were influenced by him.[216] In the field of comics, Alan Moore has described Lovecraft as having been a formative influence on his graphic novels.[229] Film director John Carpenter’s films include direct references and quotations of Lovecraft’s fiction, in addition to their use of a Lovecraftian aesthetic and themes. Guillermo del Toro has been similarly influenced by Lovecraft’s corpus.[230]
The first World Fantasy Awards were held in Providence in 1975. The theme was «The Lovecraft Circle». Until 2015, winners were presented with an elongated bust of Lovecraft that was designed by cartoonist Gahan Wilson, nicknamed the «Howard».[231] In November 2015 it was announced that the World Fantasy Award trophy would no longer be modeled on H. P. Lovecraft in response to the author’s views on race.[232] After the World Fantasy Award dropped their connection to Lovecraft, The Atlantic commented that «In the end, Lovecraft still wins—people who’ve never read a page of his work will still know who Cthulhu is for years to come, and his legacy lives on in the work of Stephen King, Guillermo del Toro, and Neil Gaiman.»[231]
In 2016, Lovecraft was inducted into the Museum of Pop Culture’s Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame.[233] Three years later, Lovecraft and the other mythos authors were posthumously awarded the 1945 Retro-Hugo Award for Best Series for their contributions to the Cthulhu Mythos.[234]
Lovecraft studies
Starting in the early 1970s, a body of scholarly work began to emerge around Lovecraft’s life and works. Referred to as Lovecraft studies, its proponents sought to establish Lovecraft as a significant author in the American literary canon. This can be traced to Derleth’s preservation and dissemination of Lovecraft’s fiction, non-fiction, and letters through Arkham House. Joshi credits the development of the field to this process. However, it was marred by low quality editions and misinterpretations of Lovecraft’s worldview. After Derleth’s death in 1971, the scholarship entered a new phase. There was a push to create a book-length biography of Lovecraft. L. Sprague de Camp, a science fiction scholar, wrote the first major one in 1975. This biography was criticized by early Lovecraft scholars for its lack of scholarly merit and its lack of sympathy for its subject. Despite this, it played a significant role in Lovecraft’s literary rise. It exposed Lovecraft to the mainstream of American literary criticism. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, there was a division in the field between the «Derlethian traditionalists» who wished to interpret Lovecraft through the lens of fantasy literature and the newer scholars who wished to place greater attention on the entirety of his corpus.[235]
The 1980s and 1990s saw a further proliferation of the field. The 1990 H. P. Lovecraft Centennial Conference and the republishing of older essays in An Epicure in the Terrible represented the publishing of many basic studies that would be used as a base for then-future studies. The 1990 centennial also saw the installation of the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Plaque» in a garden adjoining John Hay Library, that features a portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.[236] Following this, in 1996, S. T. Joshi wrote his own biography of Lovecraft. This biography was met with positive reviews and became the main biography in the field. It has since been superseded by his expanded edition of the book, I am Providence in 2010.[237]
Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation has caused his works to receive increased attention by both classics publishers and scholarly fans.[238] His works have been published by several different series of literary classics. Penguin Classics published three volumes of Lovecraft’s works between 1999 and 2004. These volumes were edited by S. T. Joshi.[238] Barnes & Noble would publish their own volume of Lovecraft’s complete fiction in 2008. The Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works in 2005. The publishing of these volumes represented a reversal of the traditional judgment that Lovecraft was not part of the Western canon.[239] Meanwhile, the biannual NecronomiCon Providence convention was first held in 2013. Its purpose is to serve as a fan and scholarly convention that discusses both Lovecraft and the wider field of weird fiction. It is organized by the Lovecraft Arts and Sciences organization and is held on the weekend of Lovecraft’s birth.[240] That July, the Providence City Council designated the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Square» and installed a commemorative sign at the intersection of Angell and Prospect streets, near the author’s former residences.[241]
Music
Lovecraft’s fictional Mythos has influenced a number of musicians, particularly in rock and heavy metal music.[242] This began in the 1960s with the formation of the psychedelic rock band H. P. Lovecraft, who released the albums H. P. Lovecraft and H. P. Lovecraft II in 1967 and 1968 respectively.[243] They broke up afterwards, but later songs were released. This included «The White Ship» and «At the Mountains of Madness», both titled after Lovecraft stories.[244] Extreme metal has also been influenced by Lovecraft.[245] This has expressed itself in both the names of bands and the contents of their albums. This began in 1970 with the release of Black Sabbath’s first album, Black Sabbath, which contained a song titled Behind the Wall of Sleep, deriving its name from the 1919 story «Beyond the Wall of Sleep.»[245] Heavy metal band Metallica was also inspired by Lovecraft. They recorded a song inspired by «The Call of Cthulhu», «The Call of Ktulu», and a song based on The Shadow over Innsmouth titled «The Thing That Should Not Be».[246] These songs contain direct quotations of Lovecraft’s works.[247] Joseph Norman, a speculative scholar, has argued that there are similarities between the music described in Lovecraft’s fiction and the aesthetics and atmosphere of black metal. He argues that this is evident through the «animalistic» qualities of black metal vocals. The usage of occult elements is also cited as a thematic commonality. In terms of atmosphere, he asserts that both Lovecraft’s works and extreme metal place heavy focus on creating a strong negative mood.[248]
Games
Lovecraft has also influenced gaming, despite having personally disliked games during his lifetime.[249] Chaosium’s tabletop role-playing game Call of Cthulhu, released in 1981 and currently in its seventh major edition, was one of the first games to draw heavily from Lovecraft.[250] It includes a Lovecraft-inspired insanity mechanic, which allowed for player characters to go insane from contact with cosmic horrors. This mechanic would go on to make appearance in subsequent tabletop and video games.[251] 1987 saw the release of another Lovecraftian board game, Arkham Horror, which was published by Fantasy Flight Games.[252] Though few subsequent Lovecraftian board games were released annually from 1987 to 2014, the years after 2014 saw a rapid increase in the number of Lovecraftian board games. According to Christina Silva, this revival may have been influenced by the entry of Lovecraft’s work into the public domain and a revival of interest in board games.[253] Few video games are direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s works, but many video games have been inspired or heavily influenced by Lovecraft.[251] Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth, a Lovecraftian first-person video game, was released in 2005.[251] It is a loose adaptation of The Shadow over Innsmouth, The Shadow Out of Time, and «The Thing on the Doorstep» that uses noir themes.[254] These adaptations focus more on Lovecraft’s monsters and gamification than they do on his themes, which represents a break from Lovecraft’s core theme of human insignificance.[255]
Religion and occultism
Several contemporary religions have been influenced by Lovecraft’s works. Kenneth Grant, the founder of the Typhonian Order, incorporated Lovecraft’s Mythos into his ritual and occult system. Grant combined his interest in Lovecraft’s fiction with his adherence to Aleister Crowley’s Thelema. The Typhonian Order considers Lovecraftian entities to be symbols through which people may interact with something inhuman.[256] Grant also argued that Crowley himself was influenced by Lovecraft’s writings, particularly in the naming of characters in The Book of the Law.[257] Similarly, The Satanic Rituals, co-written by Anton LaVey and Michael A. Aquino, includes the «Ceremony of the Nine Angles», which is a ritual that was influenced by the descriptions in «The Dreams in the Witch House». It contains invocations of several of Lovecraft’s fictional gods.[258]
There have been several books that have claimed to be an authentic edition of Lovecraft’s Necronomicon.[259] The Simon Necronomicon is one such example. It was written by an unknown figure who identified themselves as «Simon». Peter Levenda, an occult author who has written about the Necronomicon, claims that he and «Simon» came across a hidden Greek translation of the grimoire while looking through a collection of antiquities at a New York bookstore during the 1960s or 1970s.[260] This book was claimed to have borne the seal of the Necronomicon. Levenda went on to claim that Lovecraft had access to this purported scroll.[261] A textual analysis has determined that the contents of this book were derived from multiple documents that discuss Mesopotamian myth and magic. The finding of a magical text by monks is also a common theme in the history of grimoires.[262] It has been suggested that Levenda is the true author of the Simon Necronomicon.[263]
Correspondence
Although Lovecraft is known mostly for his works of weird fiction, the bulk of his writing consists of voluminous letters about a variety of topics, from weird fiction and art criticism to politics and history.[264] Lovecraft biographers L. Sprague de Camp and S. T. Joshi have estimated that Lovecraft wrote 100,000 letters in his lifetime, a fifth of which are believed to survive.[265] These letters were directed at fellow writers and members of the amateur press. His involvement in the latter was what caused him to begin writing them.[266] He included comedic elements in these letters. This included posing as an eighteenth-century gentleman and signing them with pseudonyms, most commonly «Grandpa Theobald» and «E’ch-Pi-El.»[g][268] According to Joshi, the most important sets of letters were those written to Frank Belknap Long, Clark Ashton Smith, and James F. Morton. He attributes this importance to the contents of these letters. With Long, Lovecraft argued in support and in opposition to many of Long’s viewpoints. The letters to Clark Ashton Smith are characterized by their focus on weird fiction. Lovecraft and Morton debated many scholarly subjects in their letters, resulting in what Joshi has called the «single greatest correspondence Lovecraft ever wrote.»[269]
Copyright and other legal issues
Despite several claims to the contrary, there is currently no evidence that any company or individual owns the copyright to any of Lovecraft’s works, and it is generally accepted that it has passed into the public domain.[270] Lovecraft had specified that R. H. Barlow would serve as the executor of his literary estate,[271] but these instructions were not incorporated into his will. Nevertheless, his surviving aunt carried out his expressed wishes, and Barlow was given control of Lovecraft’s literary estate upon his death. Barlow deposited the bulk of the papers, including the voluminous correspondence, in the John Hay Library, and attempted to organize and maintain Lovecraft’s other writings.[272] Lovecraft protégé August Derleth, an older and more established writer than Barlow, vied for control of the literary estate. He and Donald Wandrei, a fellow protégé and co-owner of Arkham House, falsely claimed that Derleth was the true literary executor.[273] Barlow capitulated, and later committed suicide in 1951.[274] This gave Derleth and Wandrei complete control over Lovecraft’s corpus.[275]
On October 9, 1947, Derleth purchased all rights to the stories that were published in Weird Tales. However, since April 1926 at the latest, Lovecraft had reserved all second printing rights to stories published in Weird Tales. Therefore, Weird Tales only owned the rights to at most six of Lovecraft’s tales. If Derleth had legally obtained the copyrights to these tales, there is no evidence that they were renewed before the rights expired.[276] Following Derleth’s death in 1971, Donald Wandrei sued his estate to challenge Derleth’s will, which stated that he only held the copyrights and royalties to Lovecraft’s works that were published under both his and Derleth’s names. Arkham House’s lawyer, Forrest D. Hartmann, argued that the rights to Lovecraft’s works were never renewed. Wandrei won the case, but Arkham House’s actions regarding copyright have damaged their ability to claim ownership of them.[277]
In H. P. Lovecraft: A Life, S. T. Joshi concludes that Derleth’s claims are «almost certainly fictitious» and argues that most of Lovecraft’s works that were published in the amateur press are likely in the public domain. The copyright for Lovecraft’s works would have been inherited by the only surviving heir named in his 1912 will, his aunt Annie Gamwell.[278] When she died in 1941, the copyrights passed to her remaining descendants, Ethel Phillips Morrish and Edna Lewis. They signed a document, sometimes referred to as the Morrish-Lewis gift, permitting Arkham House to republish Lovecraft’s works while retaining their ownership of the copyrights.[279] Searches of the Library of Congress have failed to find any evidence that these copyrights were renewed after the 28-year period, making it likely that these works are in the public domain.[280] However, the Lovecraft literary estate, reconstituted in 1998 under Robert C. Harrall, has claimed that they own the rights. Joshi has withdrawn his support for his conclusion, and now supports the estate’s copyright claims.[281]
Bibliography
See also
- Category:H. P. Lovecraft scholars
Explanatory notes
- ^ Lovecraft did not coin the term «Cthulhu Mythos». Instead, this term was coined by later authors.[1]
- ^ The house was later moved to 65 Prospect Street to accommodate the building of Brown University’s Art Building.[101]
- ^ He wrote several travelogues, including one on Quebec that was the longest singular work that he wrote.[107]
- ^ This is the only one of Lovecraft’s stories that was published as a book during his lifetime.[118] W. Paul Cook had previously made an abortive attempt to publish «The Shunned House» as a small book between 1927 and 1930.[119]
- ^ «Grippe» is an archaic term for influenza.[123]
- ^ L. Sprague de Camp also stated that the two men began calling each other «Monstro». This is a direct reference to the nicknames that Lovecraft gave to some of his correspondents.[201]
- ^ Lewis Theobald, Jun., the full version of Grandpa Theobald, was derived from the name of Lewis Theobald, an eighteenth-century Shakespearian scholar who was fictionalized in Alexander Pope’s The Dunciad.[267]
Citations
- ^ a b Tierney 2001, p. 52; Joshi 2010b, p. 186; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 16; de Camp 1975, p. 12; Cannon 1989, p. 1–2.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 8; de Camp 1975, p. 11; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ Joshi 2010a.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 22; de Camp 1975, pp. 15–16; Faig 1991, p. 49.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26; de Camp 1975, p. 16; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; de Camp 1975, p. 17; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 2; Cannon 1989, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 25; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, pp. 33, 36; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 34; de Camp 1975, pp. 30–31.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 38; de Camp 1975, pp. 32; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ a b Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; St. Armand 1975, pp. 140–141.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 42; St. Armand 1972, pp. 3–4; de Camp 1975, pp. 18.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 60; de Camp 1975, p. 32.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 84.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 90; Cannon 1989, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 97; Faig 1991, p. 63.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 96; de Camp 1975, pp. 37–39; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 98; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48; Faig 1991, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 99.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 102; de Camp 1975, p. 36.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 116; de Camp 1975, pp. 43–45; Cannon 1989, p. 15.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–53; Cannon 1989, p. 3.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 126–127; de Camp 1975, p. 27.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 127.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 128; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–52.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 128.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 66; Faig 1991, p. 65.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 67–68; de Camp 1975, p. 66; St. Armand 1972, p. 3.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 64.
- ^ Bonner 2015, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 154.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 129; de Camp 1975.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 137.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 138; de Camp 1975, p. 95.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 140; de Camp 1975, pp. 76–77.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, p. 76–77.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, pp. 78–79.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, pp. 145–155; de Camp 1975, p. 84.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 155; de Camp 1975, pp. 84–84.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 159.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 164.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 165.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 168; de Camp 1975, p. 153; Cannon 1989, p. 5.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 169.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 180; de Camp 1975, p. 121.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 182; de Camp 1975, pp. 121–122.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 210; Cannon 1989, p. 6.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 273; de Camp 1975, p. 125.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 239; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 240; Cannon 1989, p. 16.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 251; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 260; de Camp 1975, p. 137.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 284; de Camp 1975, p. 122.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 303; Faig 1991, p. 66.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 300; Faig 1991, pp. 66–67.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 23; Cannon 1989, p. 3; de Camp 1975, p. 118.
- ^ a b Joshi 2001, p. 125.
- ^ a b Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2001, pp. 121–122; de Camp 1975, p. 65–66.
- ^ Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2010a, p. 301; de Camp 1975, pp. 134–135.
- ^ Lovecraft 2000, p. 84.
- ^ Faig 1991, pp. 58–59; de Camp 1975, p. 135.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 306; de Camp 1975, pp. 139–141.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 308.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144; Burleson 1990, pp. 39.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; Leavenworth 2014, pp. 333–334.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 369; de Camp 1975, pp. 138–139.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 149; Burleson 1990, pp. 49, 52–53.
- ^ Burleson 1990, p. 58; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
- ^ Mosig 2001, pp. 17–18, 33; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154; Cannon 1989, pp. 4–5.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 144–145; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156; Faig 1991, p. 67.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 400; de Camp 1975, p. 152–154; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Fooy 2011; de Camp 1975, p. 184.
- ^ Everts 2012, p. 19; Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 202–203; de Camp 1975, p. 202.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 291–292; de Camp 1975, pp. 177–179, 219; Cannon 1989, p. 55.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 136; de Camp 1975, p. 219.
- ^ Fooy 2011; Cannon 1989, p. 55; Joshi 2001, p. 210.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 109–111; Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 112.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, p. 224.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, pp. 207–213.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001; St. Armand 1972, p. 10.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 225; de Camp 1975, p. 183.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 200–201; de Camp 1975, pp. 170–172.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 216–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 230–232.
- ^ Lovecraft 2009b.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 223–224; Norris 2020, p. 217; de Camp 1975, pp. 242–243.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Burleson 1990, p. 77.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 227–228; Moreland 2018, pp. 1–3; Cannon 1989, pp. 61–62.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 214–215.
- ^ Rubinton 2016; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ a b Joshi 1996a, p. 26; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354; St. Armand 1972, pp. 10–14.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–353; Goodrich 2004, pp. 37–38.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 117; Flood 2016.
- ^ Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8; Evans 2005, pp. 102–105.
- ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, p. 104; Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273; Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149, 184; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 150–151; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 273.
- ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53; Joshi 2001, p. 255; de Camp 1975, pp. 192–194.
- ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Joshi 1996b, p. 455.
- ^ Lovecraft 1976b; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 382–383.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 262–263.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 383–384.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Finn 2013, pp. 294–295; Vick 2021, pp. 130–137.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006c, pp. 216–218; Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Vick 2021, p. 143.
- ^ Lexico Dictionaries 2020.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 370, 384–385; Cannon 1989, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 415–416.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388; de Camp 1975, pp. 427–428.
- ^ The Boston Globe 1937, p. 2; Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 389; de Camp 1975, p. 428.
- ^ Mosig 1997, p. 114; Lovecraft 1968, pp. 50–51.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 8–16; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 9; Joshi 2016, p. 161.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 16; Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 94–96.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 101–102; Pedersen 2019, pp. 119–120.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 351; Pedersen 2019, pp. 141–143.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 346.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–4; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–35; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006d, pp. 85–95; Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 360–361.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, p. 145; Hölzing 2011, pp. 182–183.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; Zeller 2019, p. 18.
- ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–174.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 147–148; Joshi 2001, pp. 40, 130–133.
- ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, pp. 108–110; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
- ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Evans 2005, pp. 108–109; Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–186.
- ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Punter 1996, p. 40.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 162–163; Hambly 1996, p. viii; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–187; Evans 2005, pp. 123–125; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 221–223; Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55.
- ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, p. 125; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
- ^ Joshi 2015, p. 109.
- ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
- ^ Joshi 2015, p. 108–109; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 21–24.
- ^ a b c Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48.
- ^ Pedersen 2018, pp. 172–173; Joshi 2013, p. 263; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
- ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
- ^ Joshi 2017, pp. x–xi.
- ^ Lovecraft 2009a; Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; Cannon 1989, pp. 101–103.
- ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 135–137; Schweitzer 2018, pp. 139–143; Joshi 2013, pp. 260–261.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 253.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 168–169; Joshi 2001, pp. 228–229; St. Armand 1975, p. 142.
- ^ a b St. Armand 1975, pp. 127–128.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, p. 127.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–131.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 133–137.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 145–150.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173; Rottensteiner 1992, pp. 117–121.
- ^ Woodard 2011, p. 6; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173.
- ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, p. 174.
- ^ Lovecraft 2010, p. 97; Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
- ^ Macrobert 2015, pp. 34–39; Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
- ^ Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
- ^ Lovecraft 2014, p. 7.
- ^ Touponce 2013, pp. 62–63; Matthews 2018, p. 177; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–160.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 186–187; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–157.
- ^ Leiber 2001, p. 6; Lacy & Zani 2007, p. 70; Burleson 1990, pp. 158–159.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Pedersen 2017, pp. 28–33.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, pp. 262–263.
- ^ St. Armand 1972, pp. 14–15; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Cannon 1989, p. 73.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 314–320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 131–132.
- ^ Joshi 2016, pp. 314–320.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 316.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–172.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 183–188; Martin 2012, p. 99; Burleson 1990, pp. 107–110.
- ^ Hull 2006, pp. 10–12.
- ^ Look 2016, pp. 101–103; Halpurn & Labossiere 2009, pp. 512–513.
- ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
- ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135.
- ^ Murray 1986, pp. 54–67.
- ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29; Burleson 1990, pp. 106, 118.
- ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29.
- ^ Wilson 1950, pp. 286–290.
- ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5.
- ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5; Cannon 1989, p. 126.
- ^ Scott 1943, p. 41.
- ^ Cuppy 1944, p. 10.
- ^ a b Gale 1960, pp. 100–103.
- ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 1–10.
- ^ Lovecraft 2013, pp. xiii–xiv.
- ^ Dirda 2012.
- ^ Mamatas 2014.
- ^ Lovecraft Annual 2007, p. 160; Eberhart 2005, p. 82; Grant 2005, p. 146.
- ^ Joshi 2015, pp. 105–116; Sperling 2016, p. 75; Hantke 2013, pp. 137–138.
- ^ Sederholm & Weinstock 2016, pp. 2, 8–9.
- ^ Gray 2014; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 91, 252.
- ^ Oates 1996.
- ^ a b Wohleber 1995.
- ^ King 1987, p. 63.
- ^ Peak 2020, pp. 169–172; Elfren 2016.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89.
- ^ Sperling 2016, pp. 75–78.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; Dirda 2005; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
- ^ Schoell 2004, pp. 8–40.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 141–142.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 390–391; de Camp 1975, p. 132; Hantke 2013, p. 135–136.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52–53; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
- ^ Talbot 2014.
- ^ Janicker 2015, pp. 473; Norris 2018, pp. 158–159; Nelson 2012, pp. 221–222.
- ^ a b Cruz 2015.
- ^ Flood 2015.
- ^ Locus Online 2017.
- ^ The Hugo Awards 2020.
- ^ Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64; Joshi 1985a, pp. 19–25; Joshi 1985b, pp. 54–58.
- ^ Rubinton 2016; Joshi 2001, pp. 219.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 5–6; Oates 1996; Mariconda 2010, pp. 208–209.
- ^ a b Hantke 2013, p. 138; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Dziemianowicz 2010; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Siclen 2015; Smith 2017; Dirda 2019.
- ^ Bilow 2013.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, p. 7; Sederholm 2016, pp. 266–267.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24; Sederholm 2016, p. 271.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24.
- ^ a b Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
- ^ Griwkowsky 2008; Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272; Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
- ^ Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272.
- ^ Norman 2013, pp. 197–202.
- ^ Lovecraft 1976a, p. 13; Carbonell 2019, p. 137.
- ^ Carbonell 2019, p. 160; Gollop 2017; Garrad 2021, p. 25.
- ^ a b c Gollop 2017.
- ^ Gollop 2017; Silva 2017; Garrad 2021, pp. 26–27.
- ^ Silva 2017.
- ^ Garrad 2021, pp. 27–28.
- ^ Garrad 2021, p. 28.
- ^ Engle 2014, pp. 89–90; Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
- ^ Engle 2014, p. 89–90.
- ^ Engle 2014, p. 91.
- ^ Clore 2001, pp. 61–69.
- ^ Levenda 2014.
- ^ Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
- ^ Davies 2009, p. 268.
- ^ Flatley 2013.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242; Cannon 1989, p. 10; de Camp 1975, p. xii.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. xii; Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–237.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–239.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; Wetzel 1983, pp. 19–20.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 245–246; Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 113–114.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242.
- ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 12.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 4–6.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 432; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, pp. 10–12.
- ^ Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, p. 11.
- ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641.
- ^ Karr 2018, The «Donald Wandrei v. The Estate of August Derleth» Hypothesis.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640; Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights.
- ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 641; Wetzel 1983, pp. 24–25.
- ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 25.
- ^ Karr 2018, Coda.
General and cited sources
- «1945 Retro-Hugo Awards». The Hugo Awards. 2020. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020.
- «2016 SF&F Hall of Fame Inductees». Locus Online. January 17, 2017. Archived from the original on December 22, 2019.
- Bilow, Michael (July 27, 2013). «We are Providence: The H.P. Lovecraft Community». Motif Magazine. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013.
- Bonner, Marian F. (2015). «Miscellaneous Impressions of H.P.L.». Lovecraft Annual (9): 52–53. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868496.
- «Briefly Noted». Lovecraft Annual (1): 160. 2007. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868367.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1990). Lovecraft: Disturbing the Universe (First ed.). Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9319-9. JSTOR j.ctt130jf9h. OCLC 895675279.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1991–1992). «Lovecraft: Dreams and Reality». Books at Brown. 38–39: 7–12. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
- Butler, James O. (2014). «Terror and Terrain: The Environmental Semantics of Lovecraft County». Lovecraft Annual (8): 131–149. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868485.
- Cannon, Peter (1989). H. P. Lovecraft. Twayne’s United States Authors Series. Vol. 549. Boston: Twayne. ISBN 0-8057-7539-0. OCLC 246440364.
- Carbonell, Curtis D. (2019). «Lovecraft’s (Cthulhu) Mythos». Dread Trident: Tabletop Role-Playing Games and the Modern Fantastic. Liverpool University Press. pp. 137–165. doi:10.3828/liverpool/9781789620573.003.0005. ISBN 978-1-78962-468-7. JSTOR j.ctv12pntt4.8. OCLC 1155494616. S2CID 219891871.
- Clore, Dan (n.d.) [first published Fall 2001]. «The Lurker on the Threshold of Interpretation: Hoax Necronomicons and Paratextual Noise». Lovecraft Studies (42–43): 61–69. ISSN 0899-8361. Archived from the original on October 26, 2009 – via Yahoo! GeoCities.
- Cruz, Lenika (November 12, 2015). «‘Political Correctness’ Won’t Ruin H.P. Lovecraft’s Legacy». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015.
- Cuppy, Will (January 2, 1944). «Review of Beyond the Wall of Sleep». New York Herald Tribune. p. 10. ISSN 1941-0646.
- Davies, Owen (2009). Grimoires: A History of Magic Books. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-150924-7. OCLC 434863058.
- de Camp, L. Sprague (March 1979). «H. P. Lovecraft and Edmund Wilson». Fantasy Mongers. No. 1. ISSN 8755-7479.
- de Camp, L. Sprague (1975). Lovecraft: A Biography (First ed.). Garden City, New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-00578-4. OCLC 979196. S2CID 190754775.
- Dirda, Michael (2012). «Cthulhu for President». The Times Literary Supplement. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020.
- Dirda, Michael (September 4, 2019). «Dispatch from a ‘Horror’ Convention: It Began in a Dark, Candlelit Room . . «. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. ProQuest 2284363189. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Dirda, Michael (March 7, 2005). «The Horror, the Horror!». The Weekly Standard. ISSN 1083-3013. Archived from the original on November 5, 2009.
- Dziemianowicz, Stefan (July 12, 2010). «Terror Eternal: The Enduring Popularity of H. P. Lovecraft». Publishers Weekly. ISSN 0000-0019. ProQuest 609957378.
- Eberhart, John Mark (February 13, 2005). «The Library of Lovecraft». The Kansas City Star. p. 82. ISSN 0745-1067. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Elfren, Isabella van (2016). «Hyper-Cacophony: Lovecraft, Speculative Realism, and Sonic Materialism». In Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (eds.). The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 79–96. ISBN 978-0-8166-9925-4. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.8. OCLC 945632985. S2CID 194316992.
- Engle, John (October 15, 2014). «Cults of Lovecraft: The Impact of H.P. Lovecraft’s Fiction on Contemporary Occult Practices». Mythlore. 33 (125): 85–98. JSTOR 26815942. S2CID 159074285 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
- Evans, Timothy H. (2005). «A Last Defense against the Dark: Folklore, Horror, and the Uses of Tradition in the Works of H. P. Lovecraft». Journal of Folklore Research. 42 (1): 99–135. doi:10.2979/JFR.2005.42.1.99. ISSN 0737-7037. JSTOR 3814792. S2CID 162356996.
- Everts, R. Alain (June 22, 2012) [first published July 1974]. «Howard Phillips Lovecraft and Sex: or The Sex Life of a Gentleman». Nyctalops. Vol. 2, no. 2. p. 19. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019 – via The H. P. Lovecraft Archive.
- Faig, Kenneth W. Jr. (1991). «The Parents of Howard Phillips Lovecraft». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). An Epicure in the Terrible: A Centennial Anthology of Essays in Honor of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). Madison, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 45–77. ISBN 0-8386-3415-X. OCLC 22766987.
- Finn, Mark (2013). Blood and Thunder: The Life and Art of Robert E. Howard (Third ed.). Cross Plains, Texas: Robert E. Howard Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-304-03152-5. OCLC 923870328.
- Flatley, Joseph L. (November 12, 2013). «The Cult of Cthulhu: Real Prayer for a Fake Tentacle». The Verge. Archived from the original on October 29, 2019.
- Flood, Alison (March 16, 2016). «Lost HP Lovecraft Work Commissioned by Houdini Escapes Shackles of History». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on October 8, 2016.
- Flood, Alison (November 9, 2015). «World Fantasy Award Drops HP Lovecraft as Prize Image». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 18, 2015.
- Fooy, Frederick (October 27, 2011). «Resident Horror Genius». South Brooklyn Post. Archived from the original on August 2, 2016.
- Gale, Floyd C. (April 1960). «Galaxy’s 5 Star Shelf». Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 100–103.
- Garrad, Jonathan (November 15, 2021). «Gamifying Fictions of Defeat: Adaptations of Lovecraft to Games Media». Studies in Gothic Fiction. 7: 20–29. ISSN 2156-2407.
- Gollop, Julian (November 16, 2017). «The Gollop Chamber: Where Are All the Lovecraftian Games?». PC Gamer. Archived from the original on March 7, 2018.
- Goodrich, Peter (2004). «Mannerism and the Macabre in H. P. Lovecraft’s Dunsanian ‘Dream-Quest’«. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 15 (1 (57)): 37–48. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 43308683.
- Grant, Gavin J. (April 17, 2005). «That Delicious Feeling of Dread». The Los Angeles Times. p. 146. ISSN 0458-3035. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Gray, John (October 24, 2014). «Weird Realism: John Gray on the Moral Universe of H P Lovecraft». New Statesman. ISSN 1758-924X. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016.
- Greene, Sonia; Scott, Winfield Townley (August 22, 1948). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft as His Wife Remembers Him». The Providence Journal. p. 8. ISSN 2574-3406. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022.
- Griwkowsky, Fish (December 8, 2008). «Interview with James Hetfield». Jam.canoe.ca. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012.
- «Grippe». Lexico Dictionaries. Archived from the original on January 23, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
- Halpurn, Paul; Labossiere, Michael C. (2009). «Mind Out of Time: Identity, Perception, and the Fourth Dimension in H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Shadow Out of Time’ and ‘The Dreams in the Witch House’«. Extrapolation. 50 (3): 512–533, 375. doi:10.3828/extr.2009.50.3.8. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 162319821. ProQuest 2152642098.
- Hambly, Barbara (1996). «Introduction: The Man Who Loved His Craft». The Transition of H. P. Lovecraft: The Road to Madness (First ed.). New York: Ballantine Books. pp. vii–x. ISBN 0-345-38422-9. OCLC 34669226.
- Hantke, Steffen (2013). «From the Library of America to the Mountains of Madness: Recent Discourse on H. P. Lovecraft». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135–156. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_9. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 163339940.
- Harman, Graham (2012). Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78099-907-4. OCLC 1058277738.
- Hess, Clara (1971). «Addenda to ‘H.P.L.: A Memoir’«. In Derleth, August (ed.). Something about Cats, and Other Pieces (First ed.). Books for Libraries Press. pp. 247–277. ISBN 0-8369-2410-X. OCLC 222440.
- Hill, Gary; Joshi, S. T. (2006). The Strange Sound of Cthulhu: Music Inspired by the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft. United States: Music Street Journal. ISBN 978-1-84728-776-2. OCLC 128175889.
- Hölzing, Roland (2011). «Lovecraft: A Gentleman without Five Senses». Lovecraft Annual (5): 181–187. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868439.
- Hull, Thomas (2006). «H.P. Lovecraft: A Horror in Higher Dimensions». Math Horizons. Vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 10–12. doi:10.1080/10724117.2006.11974625. ISSN 1072-4117. JSTOR 25678597.
- Jamneck, Lynne (2012). «Tekeli-li! Disturbing Language in Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (6): 126–151. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868454.
- Janicker, Rebecca (2015). «Visions of Monstrosity: Lovecraft, Adaptation and the Comics Arts». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 469–488. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321171.
- Joshi, S. T. (2001). A Dreamer and a Visionary: H. P. Lovecraft in His Time. Liverpool Science Fiction Texts and Studies. Vol. 26 (First ed.). Liverpool University Press. doi:10.5949/upo9781846312991. ISBN 978-1-84631-299-1. JSTOR j.ctt5vjhg7. OCLC 276177497.
- Joshi, S. T. (1996a). A Subtler Magick: The Writings and Philosophy of H.P. Lovecraft (Third ed.). Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-61-0. OCLC 4566934. S2CID 169172551.
- Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (2001). An H.P. Lovecraft Encyclopedia (First ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-01682-8. OCLC 608158798.
- Joshi, S. T. (2015). «Charles Baxter on Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (9): 105–122. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868501.
- Joshi, S. T. (2013). «Lovecraft’s ‘Dunsanian Studies’«. In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Critical Essays on Lord Dunsany. Scarecrow Press. pp. 241–264. ISBN 978-0-8108-9235-4. OCLC 1026953908.
- Joshi, S. T. (1996b). H. P. Lovecraft: A Life (First ed.). West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. ISBN 0-940884-89-5. OCLC 34906142.
- Joshi, S. T. (2016). H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West (First ed.). Wildside Press. ISBN 978-1-4794-2754-3. OCLC 988396691.
- Joshi, S. T. (2010a). I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-0-9824296-7-9. OCLC 650504348. S2CID 190428196.
- Joshi, S. T. (1984). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies 1971–1982 (Part I)». Lovecraft Studies. 3 (2): 62–71. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (1985a). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part II)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (1): 18–28. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (1985b). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part III)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (2): 54–65. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (2017). «Foreword». In Moreland, Sean (ed.). The Lovecraftian Poe: Essays on Influence, Reception, Interpretation, and Transformation. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: Lehigh University Press. pp. ix–xiv. ISBN 978-1-61146-241-8. OCLC 973481779.
- Joshi, S. T. (2010b). «Time, Space, and Natural Law: Science and Pseudo-Science in Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (4): 171–201. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868421.
- Karr, Chris J. (July 10, 2018). «The Black Seas of Copyright». Aetherial. Archived from the original on April 25, 2020.
- King, Stephen (1987). Danse Macabre. Berkley. ISBN 0-425-06462-X. OCLC 10242612. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
- Klein, Anna (2012). «Misperceptions of Malignity: Narrative Form and the Threat to America’s Modernity in ‘The Shadow over Innsmouth’«. Lovecraft Annual (6): 182–198. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868459.
- Lacy, Jeff; Zani, Steven J. (2007). «The Negative Mystics of the Mechanistic Sublime: Walter Benjamin and Lovecraft’s Cosmicism». Lovecraft Annual (1): 65–83. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868355. S2CID 11647892.
- Leavenworth, Van (2014). «The Developing Storyworld of H. P. Lovecraft». In Ryan, Marie-Laure; Thon, Jan-Noël (eds.). Storyworlds Across Media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology. Frontiers of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 332–350. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. ISBN 978-0-8032-5532-6. JSTOR j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. OCLC 880964681. S2CID 190258640.
- Leiber, Fritz (2001) [first published 1949]. «A Literary Copernicus». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft (Revised ed.). Holicong, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 7–16. ISBN 1-58715-470-6. OCLC 48212283.
- Levenda, Peter (November 30, 2014). «Finding the Simon Necronomicon». The Lip TV. Archived from the original on February 6, 2022 – via YouTube.
- Livesey, T. R. (2008). «Dispatches from the Providence Observatory: Astronomical Motifs and Sources in the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (2): 3–87. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868370.
- Look, Daniel M. (2016). «Queer Geometry and Higher Dimensions: Mathematics in the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (10): 101–120. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868515.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2010) [written November 22, 1930]. «Religion and Indeterminacy». In Joshi, S. T.; Hitchens, Christopher (eds.). Against Religion: The Atheist Writings of H.P. Lovecraft. New York: Sporting Gentlemen. pp. 87–99. ISBN 978-0-578-05248-9. OCLC 665081122.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009a). «At the Mountains of Madness». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006a) [first published February 1922]. «A Confession of Unfaith». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 145–148. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006b). «Instructions in Case of Decease». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 237–240. ISBN 978-0-9721644-1-2. OCLC 875361303.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006c) [first published 1936]. «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 216–218. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006d) [written February 22, 1933]. «Some Repetitions on the Times». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 85–95. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009b). «He». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2014). Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). «Letters to Farnsworth Wright». Lovecraft Annual (8): 5–59. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868482.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2000). «Amateur Journalism». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). Lord of a Visible World: An Autobiography in Letters. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. pp. 39–86. ISBN 0-8214-1332-5. OCLC 43567292.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1968) [sent May 16, 1926]. «To James F. Morton». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. II. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 50–51. ISBN 0-87054-034-3. OCLC 1152654519.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1976a). Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. IV. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-035-1. OCLC 20590805.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1976b) [sent February 7, 1937]. «To Catherine L. Moore». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. V. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 407–408. ISBN 0-87054-036-X. OCLC 1000556488.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2013). Luckhurst, Roger (ed.). The Classic Horror Stories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-164088-9. OCLC 958573276. S2CID 190969085.
- Lovett-Graff, Bennett (1997). «Shadows over Lovecraft: Reactionary Fantasy and Immigrant Eugenics». Extrapolation. 38 (3): 175–192. doi:10.3828/extr.1997.38.3.175. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 164434496. ProQuest 234914041.
- Lubnow, Fred S. (2019). «The Lovecraftian Solar System». Lovecraft Annual (13): 3–26. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868571.
- Macrobert, Franch A. (2015). «Cosmic Dread: The Astronomy of H. P. Lovecraft». Sky & Telescope. Vol. 129, no. 2. pp. 34–39. ISSN 0037-6604.
- Mamatas, Nick (November 24, 2014). «The Real Mr. Difficult, or Why Cthulhu Threatens to Destroy the Canon, Self-Interested Literary Essayists, and the Universe Itself. Finally». Los Angeles Review of Books. Archived from the original on June 15, 2016.
- Mariconda, Steven J. (2010). «Review of I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft«. Lovecraft Annual (4): 208–215. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868424.
- Martin, Sean Elliot (2012). «Lovecraft, Absurdity, and the Modernist Grotesque». Lovecraft Annual (6): 82–112. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868452.
- Matthews, Carol S. (April 15, 2018). «Letting Sleeping Abnormalities Lie: Lovecraft and the Futility of Divination». Mythlore. 36 (2): 165–184. JSTOR 26809310. S2CID 165217534. ProQuest 2036317509 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
- Moreland, Sean (2018). «Introduction: The Critical (After)Life of Supernatural Horror in Literature«. New Directions in Supernatural Horror Literature: The Critical Influence of H. P. Lovecraft. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95477-6_1. ISBN 978-3-319-95477-6.
- Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (1997). «Life After Lovecraft: Reminiscences of a Non-Entity». Mosig at Last: A Psychologist Looks at H.P. Lovecraft. West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. pp. 111–116. ISBN 978-0-940884-90-8. OCLC 681921217.
- Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (2001) [first published 1974]. «The Four Faces of the Outsider». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 17–34. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
- Murray, Will (October 1, 1986). «In Search of Arkham Country». Lovecraft Studies. 5 (2): 54–67. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Murray, Will (1991–1992). «Lovecraft’s Arkham Country». Books at Brown. 38–39: 19–29. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
- Nelson, Victoria (2012). «Cathedral Head: The Gothick Cosmos of Guillermo del Toro». Gothicka. Harvard University Press. pp. 219–237. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674065406.c10. ISBN 978-0-674-05014-3. JSTOR j.ctt24hj8c.13. S2CID 191845332.
- Norman, Joseph (2013). «‘Sounds Which Filled Me with an Indefinable Dread’: The Cthulhu Mythopoeia of H. P. Lovecraft in ‘Extreme’ Metal». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 193–208. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_11. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 192763998.
- Norris, Duncan (2018). «The Void: A Lovecraftian Analysis». Lovecraft Annual (12): 149–164. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868564.
- Norris, Duncan (2020). «Zeitgeist and Untoten: Lovecraft and the Walking Dead». Lovecraft Annual (14): 189–240. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26939817.
- «Notable Persons Interred at Swan Point Cemetery». Swan Point Cemetery. Archived from the original on January 22, 2016.
- Oates, Joyce Carol (October 31, 1996). «The King of Weird». The New York Review of Books. Vol. 43, no. 17. ISSN 0028-7504. Archived from the original on September 10, 2009.
- Peak, David (2020). «Horror of the Real: H.P. Lovecraft’s Old Ones and Contemporary Speculative Philosophy». In Rosen, Matt (ed.). Diseases of the Head: Essays on the Horrors of Speculative Philosophy. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. pp. 163–180. doi:10.2307/j.ctv19cwdpb.7. ISBN 978-1-953035-10-3. JSTOR j.ctv19cwdpb.7. OCLC 1227264756. S2CID 229019856.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2018). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Romantic on the Nightside». Lovecraft Annual (12): 165–173. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868565.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2019). ««Now Will You Be Good?»: Lovecraft, Teetotalism, and Philosophy». Lovecraft Annual (13): 119–144. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868581.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2017). «On Lovecraft’s Lifelong Relationship with Wonder». Lovecraft Annual (11): 23–36. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868530.
- Powell, Anna (2019). «Thinking the Thing: The Outer Reaches of Knowledge in Lovecraft and Deleuze». In Hogle, Jerrold E.; Miles, Robert (eds.). The Gothic and Theory: An Edinburgh Companion. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 260–278. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427777.003.0014. ISBN 978-1-4744-2777-7. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvggx38r.17. OCLC 1145928444. S2CID 213917604.
- Punter, David (1996). The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the Present Day. Vol. II. New York: Longman. ISBN 0-582-23714-9. OCLC 1072397754.
- Ransom, Amy J. (2015). «Lovecraft in Quebec: Transcultural Fertilization and Esther Rochon’s Reevaluation of the Powers of Horror». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 450–468. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321170. S2CID 165970090. ProQuest 1861072902.
- Rottensteiner, Franz (1992). «Lovecraft as Philosopher». Science Fiction Studies. 19 (1): 117–121. JSTOR 4240129.
- Rubinton, Noel (August 10, 2016). «How to Find the Spirit of H.P. Lovecraft in Providence». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. ProQuest 1810306270. Archived from the original on October 13, 2018.
- Sederholm, Carl H. (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft, Heavy Metal, and Cosmicism». Rock Music Studies. 3 (3): 266–280. doi:10.1080/19401159.2015.1121644. ISSN 1940-1159. S2CID 194537597.
- Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (2016). «Introduction: Lovecraft Rising». The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 1–42. ISBN 978-1-4529-5023-5. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.5. OCLC 945632985.
- Schoell, William (2004). H.P. Lovecraft: Master of Weird Fiction (First ed.). Greensboro, North Carolina: Morgan Reynolds. ISBN 1-931798-15-X. OCLC 903506614.
- Schultz, David E. (2018). «‘Whaddya Make Them Eyes at Me For?’: Lovecraft and Book Publishers». Lovecraft Annual (12): 51–65. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868555.
- Schweitzer, Darrell (2018). «Lovecraft, Aristeas, Dunsany, and the Dream Journey». Lovecraft Annual (12): 136–143. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868561.
- Schweitzer, Darrell (1998). Windows of the Imagination: Essays on Fantastic Literature. Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-60-2. OCLC 48566644. S2CID 190964524.
- Scott, Winfield Townley (December 26, 1943). «The Case of Howard Phillips Lovecraft of Providence, R.I.» The Providence Journal. p. 41. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved August 23, 2021 – via GenealogyBank.com.
- Siclen, Bill Van (August 16, 2015). «NecronomiCon Providence to celebrate life and work of H. P. Lovecraft». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Silva, Christianna (June 7, 2017). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Monster Is Wrapping Family Game Night Up In Tentacles». National Public Radio. Archived from the original on February 28, 2018.
- Smith, Andy (August 16, 2017). «NecronomiCon, homage to H. P. Lovecraft, returns to Providence». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Sperling, Alison (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Weird Body». Lovecraft Annual (10): 75–100. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868514.
- St. Armand, Barton Levi (1972). «Facts in the Case of H. P. Lovecraft» (PDF). Rhode Island History. 31 (1): 3–20. ISSN 0035-4619 – via Rhode Island Historical Society.
- St. Armand, Barton Levi (1975). «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent». Caliban. 12 (1): 127–155. doi:10.3406/calib.1975.1046. eISSN 2431-1766. S2CID 220649713.
- Steiner, Bernd (2005). H. P. Lovecraft and the Literature of the Fantastic: Explorations in a Literary Genre. Munich: GRIN Verlag. ISBN 978-3-638-84462-8. OCLC 724541939.
- Talbot, Nick (August 31, 2014). «All About Alienation: Alan Moore On Lovecraft And Providence». The Quietus.
- Tierney, Richard L. (2001) [first published 1972]. «The Derleth Mythos». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 52–53. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
- Touponce, William F. (2013). Lord Dunsany, H. P. Lovecraft, and Ray Bradbury: Spectral Journeys. Studies in Supernatural Literature. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-9220-0. OCLC 873404866.
- Vick, Todd B. (2021). Renegades and Rogues: The Life and Legacy of Robert E. Howard. Austin: University of Texas Press. doi:10.7560/321959. ISBN 978-1-4773-2195-9. OCLC 1159658615. S2CID 241275357.
- Wetzel, George T. (1983). The Lovecraft Scholar (PDF). Darien, Connecticut: Hobgoblin Press.
- Wilson, Colin (1975). The Strength to Dream: Literature and the Imagination (Second ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-8371-6819-7. OCLC 630646359.
- Wilson, Edmund (1950) [first published November 24, 1945]. «Tales of the Marvellous and the Ridiculous». Classics and Commercials: A Literary Chronicle of the Forties. New York: Macmillan. pp. 286–290. ISBN 0-374-52667-2. OCLC 964373.
- Wohleber, Curt (December 1995). «The Man Who Can Scare Stephen King». American Heritage. Vol. 46, no. 8. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
- Wolanin, Tyler L. (2013). «New Deal Politics in the Correspondence of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (7): 3–35. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868464.
- Woodard, Ben (2011). «Mad Speculation and Absolute Inhumanism: Lovecraft, Ligotti, and the Weirding of Philosophy». Continent. 1 (1): 3–13. doi:10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225. ISSN 2159-9920. S2CID 170136177.
- «Wrote of His Last Month Alive». The Boston Globe. March 15, 1937. p. 2. ISSN 0743-1791. Archived from the original on February 28, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Zeller, Benjamin E. (December 2019). «Altar Call of Cthulhu: Religion and Millennialism in H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos». Religions. 11 (1): 18. doi:10.3390/rel11010018. ISSN 2077-1444. S2CID 213736759.
Further reading
- Anderson, James Arthur; Joshi, S. T. (2011). Out of the Shadows: A Structuralist Approach to Understanding the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft. Rockville, Maryland: Wildside Press. doi:10.23860/diss-anderson-james-1992. ISBN 978-1-4794-0384-4. OCLC 1127558354. S2CID 171675509.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1983). H. P. Lovecraft: A Critical Study. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-23255-8. OCLC 299389026. S2CID 190394934.
- Callaghan, Gavin (2013). H. P. Lovecraft’s Dark Arcadia: The Satire, Symbology and Contradiction. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-1-4766-0239-4. OCLC 856844361.
- Cannon, Peter, ed. (1998). Lovecraft Remembered. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 978-0-87054-173-5. OCLC 260088015.
- Carter, Lin (1972). Lovecraft: A Look Behind the «Cthulhu Mythos». New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-586-04166-4. OCLC 2213597. S2CID 190363598.
- Frierson, Meade; Frierson, Penny (March 1972). HPL: A Tribute to Howard Phillips Lovecraft (PDF). Birmingham, Alabama: Meade and Penny Frierson. OCLC 315586.
- González Grueso, Fernando Darío (2017). La ficción científica. Género, Poética y sus relaciones con la literatura oral tradicional: El papel de H. P. Lovecraft como mediador. Colección Estudios (in Spanish). Madrid: UAM Ediciones. doi:10.15366/ficcion.cientif2013. ISBN 978-84-8344-376-7. OCLC 1026295184. S2CID 183258592.
- Hegyi, Pál (2019). Lovecraft Laughing: Uncanny Memes in the Weird. Department of American Studies, University of Szeged. doi:10.14232/americana.books.2019.hegyi.lovecraft. ISBN 978-615-5423-56-7. OCLC 8160851320. S2CID 192043054.
- Houellebecq, Michel; King, Stephen (2005). H. P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life. Translated by Khazeni, Dorna. Cernunnos. ISBN 1-932416-18-8. OCLC 1151841813. S2CID 190374730.
- Joshi, S. T. (1980). H. P. Lovecraft, Four Decades of Criticism (First ed.). Athens: Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-0442-3. OCLC 6085440.
- Klinger, Leslie S. (2014). The New Annotated H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-87140-453-4. OCLC 884500241. S2CID 218735034.
- Lévy, Maurice (1988) [first published 1972]. Lovecraft: A Study in the Fantastic. Translated by Joshi, S. T. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-1956-7. OCLC 491484555. S2CID 190967971.
- Long, Frank Belknap (1975). Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Dreamer on the Nightside. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-068-8. OCLC 2034623. S2CID 160306366.
- Ludueña, Fabián; de Acosta, Alejandro (2015). H. P. Lovecraft: The Disjunction in Being. Translated by de Acosta, Alejandro. United States: Schism. ISBN 978-1-5058-6600-1. OCLC 935704008.
- Lovecraft, H. P.; Conover, Willis; Joshi, S. T. (2002). Lovecraft at Last: The Master of Horror in His Own Words (Revised ed.). New York: Cooper Square Press. ISBN 0-8154-1212-6. OCLC 50212624.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1999). Joshi, S. T.; Cannon, Peter (eds.). More Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50875-4. OCLC 41231274.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1997). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50660-3. OCLC 36165172.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2012). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature (Second ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-1-61498-028-5. OCLC 855115722.
- Shapiro, Stephen; Philip, Barnard (2017). Pentecostal Modernism: Lovecraft, Los Angeles and World-Systems Culture. New Directions in Religion and Literature. Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781474238762. ISBN 978-1-4742-3873-1. OCLC 1065524061. S2CID 148868506.
- Martin, Sean Elliot (December 2008). H.P. Lovecraft and the Modernist Grotesque (PhD thesis). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University. ISBN 9781448610167. OCLC 601419113. S2CID 191576874.
- Migliore, Andrew; Strysik, John (2006). The Lurker in the Lobby: A Guide to the Cinema of H. P. Lovecraft. Portland, Oregon: Night Shade Books. ISBN 978-1-892389-35-0. OCLC 1023313647. S2CID 152612871.
- Montaclair, Florent; Picot, Jean-Pierre (1997). Fantastique et événement : Étude comparée des œuvres de Jules Verne et Howard P. Lovecraft. Annales littéraires (in French). Vol. 621. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté. doi:10.4000/books.pufc.1726. ISBN 978-2-84867-692-0. OCLC 1286480358. S2CID 228019349.
- Wilson, Eric (2016). The Republic of Cthulhu: Lovecraft, the Weird Tale, and Conspiracy Theory. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. doi:10.21983/P3.0155.1.00. ISBN 978-0-9982375-6-5. OCLC 1135348793. S2CID 165947887.
External links
- The H. P. Lovecraft Archive
- The H. P. Lovecraft Historical Society
- The Lovecraft Arts & Sciences Council, a non-profit educational organization
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Fantasy
- H. P. Lovecraft at IMDb
- H. P. Lovecraft discography at Discogs
Journals
- Lovecraft Annual
- Lovecraft Studies
- Crypt of Cthulhu
Library collections
- H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Special Collections at the John Hay Library (Brown University)
- H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Distinctive Collections of Falvey Memorial Library (Villanova University)
Online editions
- Works by Howard Phillips Lovecraft at Project Gutenberg
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft at Faded Page (Canada)
- Works by or about H. P. Lovecraft at Internet Archive
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft in eBook form at Standard Ebooks
H. P. Lovecraft |
|
---|---|
Lovecraft in 1934 |
|
Born | Howard Phillips Lovecraft August 20, 1890 Providence, Rhode Island, U.S. |
Died | March 15, 1937 (aged 46) Providence, Rhode Island, U.S. |
Resting place | Swan Point Cemetery, Providence 41°51′14″N 71°22′52″W / 41.854021°N 71.381068°W |
Pen name |
|
Occupation |
|
Genre | Lovecraftian horror, weird fiction, horror fiction, science fiction, gothic fiction, fantasy |
Literary movement |
|
Years active | 1917–1937 |
Notable works |
|
Spouse |
Sonia Greene (m. ) |
Signature | |
Howard Phillips Lovecraft (; August 20, 1890 – March 15, 1937) was an American writer of weird, science, fantasy, and horror fiction. He is best known for his creation of the Cthulhu Mythos.[a]
Born in Providence, Rhode Island, Lovecraft spent most of his life in New England. After his father’s institutionalization in 1893, he lived affluently until his family’s wealth dissipated after the death of his grandfather. Lovecraft then lived with his mother, in reduced financial security, until her institutionalization in 1919. He began to write essays for the United Amateur Press Association, and in 1913 wrote a critical letter to a pulp magazine that ultimately led to his involvement in pulp fiction. He became active in the speculative fiction community and was published in several pulp magazines. Lovecraft moved to New York City, marrying Sonia Greene in 1924, and later became the center of a wider group of authors known as the «Lovecraft Circle». They introduced him to Weird Tales, which would become his most prominent publisher. Lovecraft’s time in New York took a toll on his mental state and financial conditions. He returned to Providence in 1926 and produced some of his most popular works, including The Call of Cthulhu, At the Mountains of Madness, The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time. He would remain active as a writer for 11 years until his death from intestinal cancer at the age of 46.
Lovecraft’s literary corpus is based around the idea of cosmicism, which was simultaneously his personal philosophy and the main theme of his fiction. Cosmicism posits that humanity is an insignificant part of the cosmos, and could be swept away at any moment. He incorporated fantasy and science fiction elements into his stories, representing the perceived fragility of anthropocentrism. This was tied to his ambivalent views on knowledge. His works were largely set in a fictionalized version of New England. Civilizational decline also plays a major role in his works, as he believed that the West was in decline during his lifetime. Lovecraft’s early political opinions were conservative and traditionalist; additionally, he held a number of racist views for much of his adult life. Following the Great Depression, Lovecraft became a socialist, no longer believing a just aristocracy would make the world more fair.
Throughout his adult life, Lovecraft was never able to support himself from earnings as an author and editor. He was virtually unknown during his lifetime and was almost exclusively published in pulp magazines before his death. A scholarly revival of Lovecraft’s work began in the 1970s, and he is now regarded as one of the most significant 20th-century authors of supernatural horror fiction. Many direct adaptations and spiritual successors followed. Works inspired by Lovecraft, adaptations or original works, began to form the basis of the Cthulhu Mythos, which utilizes Lovecraft’s characters, setting, and themes.
Biography
Early life and family tragedies
Sarah, Howard, and Winfield Lovecraft in 1892
Lovecraft was born in his family home on August 20, 1890, in Providence, Rhode Island. He was the only child of Winfield Scott Lovecraft and Sarah Susan (née Phillips) Lovecraft.[2] Susie’s family was of substantial means at the time of their marriage, as her father, Whipple Van Buren Phillips, was involved in business ventures.[3] In April 1893, after a psychotic episode in a Chicago hotel, Winfield was committed to Butler Hospital in Providence. His medical records state that he had been «doing and saying strange things at times» for a year before his commitment.[4] The person who reported these symptoms is unknown.[5] Winfield spent five years in Butler before dying in 1898. His death certificate listed the cause of death as general paresis, a term synonymous with late-stage syphilis.[6] Throughout his life, Lovecraft maintained that his father fell into a paralytic state, due to insomnia and overwork, and remained that way until his death. It is not known whether Lovecraft was simply kept ignorant of his father’s illness or whether his later statements were intentionally misleading.[7]
After his father’s institutionalization, Lovecraft resided in the family home with his mother, his maternal aunts Lillian and Annie, and his maternal grandparents Whipple and Robie.[8] According to family friends, his mother, known as Susie, doted on the young Lovecraft excessively, pampering him and never letting him out of her sight.[9] Lovecraft later recollected that his mother was «permanently stricken with grief» after his father’s illness. Whipple became a father figure to Lovecraft in this time, Lovecraft noting that his grandfather became the «centre of my entire universe». Whipple, who often traveled to manage his business, maintained correspondence by letter with the young Lovecraft who, by the age of three, was already proficient at reading and writing.[10]
Whipple encouraged the young Lovecraft to have an appreciation of literature, especially classical literature and English poetry. In his old age, he helped raise the young H. P. Lovecraft and educated him not only in the classics, but also in original weird tales of «winged horrors» and «deep, low, moaning sounds» which he created for his grandchild’s entertainment. The original sources of Phillips’ weird tales are unidentified. Lovecraft himself guessed that they originated from Gothic novelists like Ann Radcliffe, Matthew Lewis, and Charles Maturin.[11] It was during this period that Lovecraft was introduced to some of his earliest literary influences, such as The Rime of the Ancient Mariner illustrated by Gustave Doré, One Thousand and One Nights, Thomas Bulfinch’s Age of Fable, and Ovid’s Metamorphoses.[12]
While there is no indication that Lovecraft was particularly close to his grandmother Robie, her death in 1896 had a profound effect on him. By his own account, it sent his family into «a gloom from which it never fully recovered». His mother and aunts wore black mourning dresses that «terrified» him. This is also the time that Lovecraft, approximately five-and-a-half years old, started having nightmares that later would inform his fictional writings. Specifically, he began to have recurring nightmares of beings he referred to as «night-gaunts». He credited their appearance to the influence of Doré’s illustrations, which would «whirl me through space at a sickening rate of speed, the while fretting & impelling me with their detestable tridents.» Thirty years later, night-gaunts would appear in Lovecraft’s fiction.[13]
Lovecraft’s earliest known literary works were written at the age of seven, and were poems restyling the Odyssey and other Greco-Roman mythological stories.[14] Lovecraft would later write that during his childhood he was fixated on the Greco-Roman pantheon, and briefly accepted them as genuine expressions of divinity, foregoing his Christian upbringing.[15] He recalled, at five years old, being told Santa Claus did not exist and retorted by asking why «God is not equally a myth?»[16] At the age of eight, he took a keen interest in the sciences, particularly astronomy and chemistry. He also examined the anatomical books that were held in the family library, which taught him the specifics of human reproduction that were not yet explained to him. As a result, he found that it «virtually killed my interest in the subject.»[17]
In 1902, according to Lovecraft’s later correspondence, astronomy became a guiding influence on his worldview. He began publishing the periodical Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy, using the hectograph printing method.[18] Lovecraft went in and out of elementary school repeatedly, oftentimes with home tutors making up for the lost years, missing time due to health concerns that have not been determined. The written recollections of his peers described him as withdrawn but welcoming to those who shared his then-current fascination with astronomy, inviting them to look through his prized telescope.[19]
Education and financial decline
By 1900, Whipple’s various business concerns were suffering a downturn, which resulted in the slow erosion of his family’s wealth. He was forced to let his family’s hired servants go, leaving Lovecraft, Whipple, and Susie, being the only unmarried sister, alone in the family home.[20] In the spring of 1904, Whipple’s largest business venture suffered a catastrophic failure. Within months, he died at age 70 due to a stroke. After Whipple’s death, Susie was unable to financially support the upkeep of the expansive family home on what remained of the Phillips’ estate. Later that year, she was forced to move to a small duplex with her son.[21]
Whipple Van Buren Phillips
Lovecraft called this time one of the darkest of his life, remarking in a 1934 letter that he saw no point in living anymore; he considered the possibility of committing suicide. His scientific curiosity and desire to know more about the world prevented him from doing so.[22] In fall 1904, he entered high school. Much like his earlier school years, Lovecraft was periodically removed from school for long periods for what he termed «near breakdowns». He did say, though, that while having some conflicts with teachers, he enjoyed high school, becoming close with a small circle of friends. Lovecraft also performed well academically, excelling in particular at chemistry and physics.[23] Aside from a pause in 1904, he also resumed publishing the Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy as well as starting the Scientific Gazette, which dealt mostly with chemistry.[24] It was also during this period that Lovecraft produced the first of the fictional works that he would later be known for, namely «The Beast in the Cave» and «The Alchemist».[25]
It was in 1908, prior to what would have been his high school graduation, that Lovecraft suffered another unidentified health crisis, though this instance was more severe than his prior illnesses.[26] The exact circumstances and causes remain unknown. The only direct records are Lovecraft’s own correspondence wherein he retrospectively described it variously as a «nervous collapse» and «a sort of breakdown», in one letter blaming it on the stress of high school despite his enjoying it.[27] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, he notes, «I was and am prey to intense headaches, insomnia, and general nervous weakness which prevents my continuous application to any thing.»[26]
Though Lovecraft maintained that he was going to attend Brown University after high school, he never graduated and never attended school again. Whether Lovecraft suffered from a physical ailment, a mental one, or some combination thereof has never been determined. An account from a high school classmate described Lovecraft as exhibiting «terrible tics» and that at times «he’d be sitting in his seat and he’d suddenly up and jump». Harry Brobst, a psychology professor, examined the account and claimed that chorea minor was the probable cause of Lovecraft’s childhood symptoms, while noting that instances of chorea minor after adolescence are very rare.[27] In his letters, Lovecraft acknowledged that he suffered from bouts of chorea as a child.[28] Brobst further ventured that Lovecraft’s 1908 breakdown was attributed to a «hysteroid seizure», a term that has become synonymous with atypical depression.[29] In another letter concerning the events of 1908, Lovecraft stated that he «could hardly bear to see or speak to anyone, & liked to shut out the world by pulling down dark shades & using artificial light.»[30]
Earliest recognition
Few of Lovecraft and Susie’s activities between late 1908 and 1913 were recorded.[31] Lovecraft described the steady continuation of their financial decline highlighted by his uncle’s failed business that cost Susie a large portion of their already dwindling wealth.[32] One of Susie’s friends, Clara Hess, recalled a visit during which Susie spoke continuously about Lovecraft being «so hideous that he hid from everyone and did not like to walk upon the streets where people could gaze on him.» Despite Hess’ protests to the contrary, Susie maintained this stance.[33] For his part, Lovecraft said he found his mother to be «a positive marvel of consideration».[34] A next-door neighbor later pointed out that what others in the neighborhood often assumed were loud, nocturnal quarrels between mother and son, were actually recitations of Shakespeare, an activity that seemed to delight mother and son.[35]
During this period, Lovecraft revived his earlier scientific periodicals.[31] He endeavored to commit himself to the study of organic chemistry, Susie buying the expensive glass chemistry assemblage he wanted.[36] Lovecraft found his studies were stymied by the mathematics involved, which he found boring and would cause headaches that would incapacitate him for the remainder of the day.[37] Lovecraft’s first non-self-published poem appeared in a local newspaper in 1912. Called Providence in 2000 A.D., it envisioned a future where Americans of English descent were displaced by Irish, Italian, Portuguese, and Jewish immigrants.[38] In this period he also wrote racist poetry, including «New-England Fallen» and «On the Creation of Niggers», but there is no indication that either were published during his lifetime.[39]
In 1911, Lovecraft’s letters to editors began appearing in pulp and weird-fiction magazines, most notably Argosy.[40] A 1913 letter critical of Fred Jackson, one of Argosy’s more prominent writers, started Lovecraft down a path that would define the remainder of his career as a writer. In the following letters, Lovecraft described Jackson’s stories as being «trivial, effeminate, and, in places, coarse». Continuing, Lovecraft argued that Jackson’s characters exhibit the «delicate passions and emotions proper to negroes and anthropoid apes.»[41] This sparked a nearly year-long feud in the magazine’s letters section between the two writers and their respective supporters. Lovecraft’s most prominent opponent was John Russell, who often replied in verse, and to whom Lovecraft felt compelled to reply because he respected Russell’s writing skills.[42] The most immediate effect of this feud was the recognition garnered from Edward F. Daas, then head editor of the United Amateur Press Association (UAPA).[43] Daas invited Russell and Lovecraft to join the organization and both accepted, Lovecraft in April 1914.[44]
Rejuvenation and tragedy
With the advent of United I obtained a renewed will to live; a renewed sense of existence as other than a superfluous weight; and found a sphere in which I could feel that my efforts were not wholly futile. For the first time I could imagine that my clumsy gropings after art were a little more than faint cries lost in the unlistening void.
—Lovecraft in 1921.[45]
Lovecraft immersed himself in the world of amateur journalism for most of the following decade.[45] During this period, he advocated for amateurism’s superiority to commercialism.[46] Lovecraft defined commercialism as writing for what he considered low-brow publications for pay. This was contrasted with his view of «professional publication», which was what he called writing for what he considered respectable journals and publishers. He thought of amateur journalism as serving as practice for a professional career.[47]
Lovecraft was appointed chairman of the Department of Public Criticism of the UAPA in late 1914.[48] He used this position to advocate for what he saw as the superiority of archaic English language usage. Emblematic of the Anglophilic opinions he maintained throughout his life, he openly criticized other UAPA contributors for their «Americanisms» and «slang». Often, these criticisms were embedded in xenophobic and racist statements that the «national language» was being negatively changed by immigrants.[49] In mid-1915, Lovecraft was elected vice-president of the UAPA.[50] Two years later, he was elected president and appointed other board members who mostly shared his belief in the supremacy of British English over modern American English.[51] Another significant event of this time was the beginning of World War I. Lovecraft published multiple criticisms of the American government and public’s reluctance to join the war to protect England, which he viewed as America’s ancestral homeland.[52]
In 1916, Lovecraft published his first short story, «The Alchemist», in the main UAPA journal, which was a departure from his usual verse. Due to the encouragement of W. Paul Cook, another UAPA member and future lifelong friend, Lovecraft began writing and publishing more prose fiction.[53] Soon afterwards, he wrote «The Tomb» and «Dagon».[54] «The Tomb», by Lovecraft’s own admission, was greatly influenced by the style and structure of Edgar Allan Poe’s works.[55] Meanwhile, «Dagon» is considered Lovecraft’s first work that displays the concepts and themes that his writings would later become known for.[56] Lovecraft published another short story, «Beyond the Wall of Sleep» in 1919, which was his first science fiction story.[57]
Lovecraft’s term as president of the UAPA ended in 1918, and he returned to his former post as chairman of the Department of Public Criticism.[58] In 1917, as Lovecraft related to Kleiner, Lovecraft made an aborted attempt to enlist in the United States Army. Though he passed the physical exam,[59] he told Kleiner that his mother threatened to do anything, legal or otherwise, to prove that he was unfit for service.[60] After his failed attempt to serve in World War I, he attempted to enroll in the Rhode Island National Guard, but his mother used her family connections to prevent it.[61]
During the winter of 1918–1919, Susie, exhibiting the symptoms of a nervous breakdown, went to live with her elder sister, Lillian. The nature of Susie’s illness is unclear, as her medical papers were later destroyed in a fire at Butler Hospital.[62] Winfield Townley Scott, who was able to read the papers before the fire, described Susie as having suffered a psychological collapse.[62] Neighbour and friend Clara Hess, interviewed in 1948, recalled instances of Susie describing «weird and fantastic creatures that rushed out from behind buildings and from corners at dark.»[63] In the same account, Hess described a time when they crossed paths in downtown Providence and Susie was unaware of where she was.[63] In March 1919, she was committed to Butler Hospital, like her husband before her.[64] Lovecraft’s immediate reaction to Susie’s commitment was visceral, writing to Kleiner that «existence seems of little value», and that he wished «it might terminate».[65] During Susie’s time at Butler, Lovecraft periodically visited her and walked the large grounds with her.[66]
Late 1919 saw Lovecraft become more outgoing. After a period of isolation, he began joining friends in trips to writer gatherings; the first being a talk in Boston presented by Lord Dunsany, whom Lovecraft had recently discovered and idolized.[67] In early 1920, at an amateur writer convention, he met Frank Belknap Long, who would end up being Lovecraft’s most influential and closest confidant for the remainder of his life.[68] The influence of Dunsany is apparent in his 1919 output, which is part of what would be called Lovecraft’s Dream Cycle, including «The White Ship» and «The Doom That Came to Sarnath».[69] In early 1920, he wrote «The Cats of Ulthar» and «Celephaïs», which were also strongly influenced by Dunsany.[70]
It was later in 1920 that Lovecraft began publishing the earliest Cthulhu Mythos stories. The Cthulhu Mythos, a term coined by later authors, encompasses Lovecraft’s stories that share a commonality in the revelation of cosmic insignificance, initially realistic settings, and recurring entities and texts.[71] The prose poem «Nyarlathotep» and the short story «The Crawling Chaos», in collaboration with Winifred Virginia Jackson, were written in late 1920.[72] Following in early 1921 came «The Nameless City», the first story that falls definitively within the Cthulhu Mythos. In it is one of Lovecraft’s most enduring phrases, a couplet recited by Abdul Alhazred; «That is not dead which can eternal lie; And with strange aeons even death may die.»[73] In the same year, he also wrote «The Outsider», which has become one of Lovecraft’s most heavily analyzed, and differently interpreted, stories.[74] It has been variously interpreted as being autobiographical, an allegory of the psyche, a parody of the afterlife, a commentary on humanity’s place in the universe, and a critique of progress.[75]
On May 24, 1921, Susie died in Butler Hospital, due to complications from an operation on her gallbladder five days earlier.[76] Lovecraft’s initial reaction, expressed in a letter written nine days after Susie’s death, was a deep state of sadness that crippled him physically and emotionally. He again expressed a desire that his life might end.[77] Lovecraft’s later response was relief, as he had become able to live independently from his mother. His physical health also began to improve, although he was unaware of the exact cause.[78] Despite Lovecraft’s reaction, he continued to attend amateur journalist conventions. Lovecraft met his future wife, Sonia Greene, at one such convention in July.[79]
Marriage and New York
Lovecraft and Sonia Greene on July 5, 1921
Lovecraft’s aunts disapproved of his relationship with Sonia. Lovecraft and Greene married on March 3, 1924, and relocated to her Brooklyn apartment at 259 Parkside Avenue; she thought he needed to leave Providence to flourish and was willing to support him financially.[80] Greene, who had been married before, later said Lovecraft had performed satisfactorily as a lover, though she had to take the initiative in all aspects of the relationship. She attributed Lovecraft’s passive nature to a stultifying upbringing by his mother.[81] Lovecraft’s weight increased to 200 lb (91 kg) on his wife’s home cooking.[82]
He was enthralled by New York, and, in what was informally dubbed the Kalem Club, he acquired a group of encouraging intellectual and literary friends who urged him to submit stories to Weird Tales. Its editor, Edwin Baird, accepted many of Lovecraft’s stories for the ailing publication, including «Under the Pyramids», which was ghostwritten for Harry Houdini.[83] Established informally some years before Lovecraft arrived in New York, the core Kalem Club members were boys’ adventure novelist Henry Everett McNeil, the lawyer and anarchist writer James Ferdinand Morton Jr., and the poet Reinhardt Kleiner.[84]
On January 1, 1925, Sonia moved from Parkside to Cleveland in response to a job opportunity, and Lovecraft left for a small first-floor apartment on 169 Clinton Street «at the edge of Red Hook»—a location which came to discomfort him greatly.[85] Later that year, the Kalem Club’s four regular attendees were joined by Lovecraft along with his protégé Frank Belknap Long, bookseller George Willard Kirk, and Samuel Loveman.[86] Loveman was Jewish, but he and Lovecraft became close friends in spite of the latter’s antisemitic attitudes.[87] By the 1930s, writer and publisher Herman Charles Koenig would be one of the last to become involved with the Kalem Club.[88]
Not long after the marriage, Greene lost her business and her assets disappeared in a bank failure.[89] Lovecraft made efforts to support his wife through regular jobs, but his lack of previous work experience meant he lacked proven marketable skills.[90] The publisher of Weird Tales was attempting to make the loss-making magazine profitable and offered the job of editor to Lovecraft, who declined, citing his reluctance to relocate to Chicago on aesthetic grounds.[91] Baird was succeeded by Farnsworth Wright, whose writing Lovecraft had criticized. Lovecraft’s submissions were often rejected by Wright. This may have been partially due to censorship guidelines imposed in the aftermath of a Weird Tales story that hinted at necrophilia, although after Lovecraft’s death, Wright accepted many of the stories he had originally rejected.[92]
Sonia also became ill and immediately after recovering, relocated to Cincinnati, and then to Cleveland; her employment required constant travel.[93] Added to his feelings of failure in a city with a large immigrant population, Lovecraft’s single-room apartment was burgled, leaving him with only the clothes he was wearing.[94] In August 1925, he wrote «The Horror at Red Hook» and «He», in the latter of which the narrator says «My coming to New York had been a mistake; for whereas I had looked for poignant wonder and inspiration […] I had found instead only a sense of horror and oppression which threatened to master, paralyze, and annihilate me.»[95] This was an expression of his despair at being in New York.[96] It was at around this time he wrote the outline for «The Call of Cthulhu», with its theme of the insignificance of all humanity.[97] During this time, Lovecraft wrote «Supernatural Horror in Literature» on the eponymous subject. It later became one of the most influential essays on supernatural horror.[98] With a weekly allowance Greene sent, Lovecraft moved to a working-class area of Brooklyn Heights, where he resided in a tiny apartment. He had lost approximately 40 pounds (18 kg) of body weight by 1926, when he left for Providence.[99]
Return to Providence and death
Lovecraft’s final home, May 1933 until March 10, 1937
Back in Providence, Lovecraft lived with his aunts in a «spacious brown Victorian wooden house» at 10 Barnes Street until 1933.[100] He then moved to 66 Prospect Street, which would become his final home.[b][101] The period beginning after his return to Providence contains some of his most prominent works, including The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, «The Call of Cthulhu» and The Shadow over Innsmouth.[102] The former two stories are partially autobiographical, as scholars have argued that The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath is about Lovecraft’s return to Providence and The Case of Charles Dexter Ward is, in part, about the city itself.[103] The former story also represents a partial repudiation of Dunsany’s influence, as Lovecraft had decided that his style did not come to him naturally.[104] At this time, he frequently revised work for other authors and did a large amount of ghostwriting, including The Mound, «Winged Death», and «The Diary of Alonzo Typer». Client Harry Houdini was laudatory, and attempted to help Lovecraft by introducing him to the head of a newspaper syndicate. Plans for a further project were ended by Houdini’s death in 1926.[105] After returning, he also began to engage in antiquarian travels across the eastern seaboard during the summer months.[106] During the spring–summer of 1930, Lovecraft visited, among other locations, New York City, Brattleboro, Vermont, Wilbraham, Massachusetts, Charleston, South Carolina, and Quebec City.[c][108]
Later, in August, Robert E. Howard wrote a letter to Weird Tales praising a then-recent reprint of H. P. Lovecraft’s «The Rats in the Walls» and discussing some of the Gaelic references used within.[109] Editor Farnsworth Wright forwarded the letter to Lovecraft, who responded positively to Howard, and soon the two writers were engaged in a vigorous correspondence that would last for the rest of Howard’s life.[110] Howard quickly became a member of the Lovecraft Circle, a group of writers and friends all linked through Lovecraft’s voluminous correspondence, as he introduced his many like-minded friends to one another and encouraged them to share their stories, utilize each other’s fictional creations, and help each other succeed in the field of pulp fiction.[111]
Meanwhile, Lovecraft was increasingly producing work that brought him no remuneration.[112] Affecting a calm indifference to the reception of his works, Lovecraft was in reality extremely sensitive to criticism and easily precipitated into withdrawal. He was known to give up trying to sell a story after it had been once rejected.[113] Sometimes, as with The Shadow over Innsmouth, he wrote a story that might have been commercially viable but did not try to sell it. Lovecraft even ignored interested publishers. He failed to reply when one inquired about any novel Lovecraft might have ready: although he had completed such a work, The Case of Charles Dexter Ward, it was never typed up.[114] A few years after Lovecraft had moved to Providence, he and his wife Sonia Greene, having lived separately for so long, agreed to an amicable divorce. Greene moved to California in 1933 and remarried in 1936, unaware that Lovecraft, despite his assurances to the contrary, had never officially signed the final decree.[115]
As a result of the Great Depression, he shifted towards socialism, decrying both his prior political beliefs and the rising tide of fascism.[116] He thought that socialism was a workable middle ground between what he saw as the destructive impulses of both the capitalists and the Marxists of his day. This was based in a general opposition to cultural upheaval, as well as support for an ordered society. Electorally, he supported Franklin D. Roosevelt, but he thought that the New Deal was not sufficiently leftist. Lovecraft’s support for it was based in his view that no other set of reforms were possible at that time.[117]
H. P. Lovecraft’s gravestone
In late 1936, he witnessed the publication of The Shadow over Innsmouth as a paperback book.[d] 400 copies were printed, and the work was advertised in Weird Tales and several fan magazines. However, Lovecraft was displeased, as this book was riddled with errors that required extensive editing. It sold slowly and only approximately 200 copies were bound. The remaining 200 copies were destroyed after the publisher went out of business for the next seven years. By this point, Lovecraft’s literary career was reaching its end. Shortly after having written his last original short story, «The Haunter of the Dark», he stated that the hostile reception of At the Mountains of Madness had done «more than anything to end my effective fictional career». His declining psychological and physical states made it impossible for him to continue writing fiction.[120]
On June 11, Robert E. Howard was informed that his chronically ill mother would not awaken from her coma. He walked out to his car and committed suicide with a pistol that he had stored there. His mother died shortly thereafter.[121] This deeply affected Lovecraft, who consoled Howard’s father through correspondence. Almost immediately after hearing about Howard’s death, Lovecraft wrote a brief memoir titled «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard», which he distributed to his correspondents.[122] Meanwhile, Lovecraft’s physical health was deteriorating. He was suffering from an affliction that he referred to as «grippe».[e][124]
Due to his fear of doctors, Lovecraft was not examined until a month before his death. After seeing a doctor, he was diagnosed with terminal cancer of the small intestine.[125] He remained hospitalized until he died. He lived in constant pain until his death on March 15, 1937, in Providence. In accordance with his lifelong scientific curiosity, he kept a diary of his illness until he was physically incapable of holding a pen.[126] Lovecraft was listed along with his parents on the Phillips family monument.[127] In 1977, fans erected a headstone in Swan Point Cemetery on which they inscribed his name, the dates of his birth and death, and the phrase «I AM PROVIDENCE»—a line from one of his personal letters.[128]
Personal views
Politics
H. P. Lovecraft as an eighteenth-century gentleman by Virgil Finlay
Lovecraft began his life as a Tory,[129] which was likely the result of his conservative upbringing. His family supported the Republican Party for the entirety of his life. While it is unclear how consistently he voted, he voted for Herbert Hoover in the 1928 presidential election.[130] Rhode Island as a whole remained politically conservative and Republican into the 1930s.[131] Lovecraft himself was an Anglophile who supported the British monarchy. He opposed democracy and thought that the United States should be governed by an aristocracy. This viewpoint emerged during his youth and lasted until the end of the 1920s.[132] During World War I, his Anglophilia caused him to strongly support the entente against the Central Powers. Many of his earlier poems were devoted to then-current political subjects, and he published several political essays in his amateur journal, The Conservative.[133] He was a teetotaler who supported the implementation of Prohibition, which was one of the few reforms that he supported during the early part of his life.[134] While remaining a teetotaller, he later became convinced that Prohibition was ineffectual in the 1930s.[135] His personal justification for his early political viewpoints was primarily based on tradition and aesthetics.[136]
As a result of the Great Depression, Lovecraft reexamined his political views.[137] Initially, he thought that affluent people would take on the characteristics of his ideal aristocracy and solve America’s problems. When this did not occur, he became a socialist. This shift was caused by his observation that the Depression was harming American society. It was also influenced by the increase in socialism’s political capital during the 1930s. One of the main points of Lovecraft’s socialism was its opposition to Soviet Marxism, as he thought that a Marxist revolution would bring about the destruction of American civilization. Lovecraft thought that an intellectual aristocracy needed to be formed to preserve America.[138] His ideal political system is outlined in his 1933 essay «Some Repetitions on the Times». Lovecraft used this essay to echo the political proposals that had been made over the course of the last few decades. In this essay, he advocates governmental control of resource distribution, fewer working hours and a higher wage, and unemployment insurance and old age pensions. He also outlines the need for an oligarchy of intellectuals. In his view, power must be restricted to those who are sufficiently intelligent and educated.[139] He frequently used the term «fascism» to describe this form of government, but, according to S. T. Joshi, it bears little resemblance to that ideology.[140]
Lovecraft had varied views on the political figures of his day. He was an ardent supporter of Franklin D. Roosevelt.[141] He saw that Roosevelt was trying to steer a middle course between the conservatives and the revolutionaries, which he approved of. While he thought that Roosevelt should have been enacting more progressive policies, he came to the conclusion that the New Deal was the only realistic option for reform. He thought that voting for his opponents on the political left would be a wasted effort.[142] Internationally, like many Americans, he initially expressed support for Adolf Hitler. More specifically, he thought that Hitler would preserve German culture. However, he thought that Hitler’s racial policies should be based on culture rather than descent. There is evidence that, at the end of his life, Lovecraft began to oppose Hitler. According to Harry K. Brobst, Lovecraft’s downstairs neighbor went to Germany and witnessed Jews being beaten. Lovecraft and his aunt were angered by this. His discussions of Hitler drop off after this point.[143]
Atheism
Lovecraft was an atheist. His viewpoints on religion are outlined in his 1922 essay «A Confession of Unfaith». In this essay, he describes his shift away from the Protestantism of his parents to the atheism of his adulthood. Lovecraft was raised by a conservative Protestant family. He was introduced to the Bible and the mythos of Saint Nicholas when he was two. He passively accepted both of them. Over the course of the next few years, he was introduced to Grimms’ Fairy Tales and One Thousand and One Nights, favoring the latter. In response, Lovecraft took on the identity of «Abdul Alhazred», a name he would later use for the author of the Necronomicon.[144] Lovecraft experienced a brief period as a Greco-Roman pagan shortly thereafter.[145] According to this account, his first moment of skepticism occurred before his fifth birthday, when he questioned if God is a myth after learning that Santa Claus is not real. In 1896, he was introduced to Greco-Roman myths and became «a genuine pagan».[15]
This came to an end in 1902, when Lovecraft was introduced to space. He later described this event as the most poignant in his life. In response to this discovery, Lovecraft took to studying astronomy and described his observations in the local newspaper.[146] Before his thirteenth birthday, he had become convinced of humanity’s impermanence. By the time he was seventeen, he had read detailed writings that agreed with his worldview. Lovecraft ceased writing positively about progress, instead developing his later cosmic philosophy. Despite his interests in science, he had an aversion to realistic literature, so he became interested in fantastical fiction. Lovecraft became pessimistic when he entered amateur journalism in 1914. The Great War seemed to confirm his viewpoints. He began to despise philosophical idealism. Lovecraft took to discussing and debating his pessimism with his peers, which allowed him to solidify his philosophy. His readings of Friedrich Nietzsche and H. L. Mencken, among other pessimistic writers, furthered this development. At the end of his essay, Lovecraft states that all he desired was oblivion. He was willing to cast aside any illusion that he may still have held.[147]
Race
Race is the most controversial aspect of Lovecraft’s legacy, expressed in many disparaging remarks against non-Anglo-Saxon races and cultures in his works. Scholars have argued that these racial attitudes were common in the American society of his day, particularly in New England.[148] As he grew older, his original racial worldview became a classism or elitism, which regarded the superior race to include all those self-ennobled through high culture. From the start, Lovecraft did not hold all white people in uniform high regard, but rather esteemed English people and those of English descent.[149] In his early published essays, private letters and personal utterances, he argued for a strong color line to preserve race and culture.[150] His arguments were supported using disparagements of various races in his journalism and letters, and allegorically in his fictional works that depict non-human races.[151] This is evident in his portrayal of the Deep Ones in The Shadow over Innsmouth. Their interbreeding with humanity is framed as being a type of miscegenation that corrupts both the town of Innsmouth and the protagonist.[152]
Initially, Lovecraft showed sympathy to minorities who adopted Western culture, even to the extent of marrying a Jewish woman he viewed as being «well assimilated».[153] By the 1930s, Lovecraft’s views on ethnicity and race had moderated.[154] He supported ethnicities’ preserving their native cultures; for example, he thought that «a real friend of civilisation wishes merely to make the Germans more German, the French more French, the Spaniards more Spanish, & so on.»[155] This represented a shift from his previous support for cultural assimilation. His shift was partially the result of his exposure to different cultures through his travels and circle. The former resulted in him writing positively about Québécois and First Nations cultural traditions in his travelogue of Quebec.[156] However, this did not represent a complete elimination of his racial prejudices.[157]
Influences
Lovecraft was influenced by Edgar Allan Poe and Lord Dunsany.
His interest in weird fiction began in his childhood when his grandfather, who preferred Gothic stories, would tell him stories of his own design.[12] Lovecraft’s childhood home on Angell Street had a large library that contained classical literature, scientific works, and early weird fiction. At the age of five, Lovecraft enjoyed reading One Thousand and One Nights, and was reading Nathaniel Hawthorne a year later.[158] He was also influenced by the travel literature of John Mandeville and Marco Polo.[159] This led to his discovery of gaps in then-contemporary science, which prevented Lovecraft from committing suicide in response to the death of his grandfather and his family’s declining financial situation during his adolescence.[159] These travelogues may have also had an influence on how Lovecraft’s later works describe their characters and locations. For example, there is a resemblance between the powers of the Tibetan enchanters in The Travels of Marco Polo and the powers unleashed on Sentinel Hill in «The Dunwich Horror».[159]
One of Lovecraft’s most significant literary influences was Edgar Allan Poe, whom he described as his «God of Fiction».[160] Poe’s fiction was introduced to Lovecraft when the latter was eight years old. His earlier works were significantly influenced by Poe’s prose and writing style.[161] He also made extensive use of Poe’s unity of effect in his fiction.[162] Furthermore, At the Mountains of Madness directly quotes Poe and was influenced by The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket.[163] One of the main themes of the two stories is to discuss the unreliable nature of language as a method of expressing meaning.[164] In 1919, Lovecraft’s discovery of the stories of Lord Dunsany moved his writing in a new direction, resulting in a series of fantasies. Throughout his life, Lovecraft referred to Dunsany as the author who had the greatest impact on his literary career. The initial result of this influence was the Dream Cycle, a series of fantasies that originally take place in prehistory, but later shift to a dreamworld setting.[165] By 1930, Lovecraft decided that he would no longer write Dunsanian fantasies, arguing that the style did not come naturally to him.[166] Additionally, he also read and cited Arthur Machen and Algernon Blackwood as influences in the 1920s.[167]
Aside from horror authors, Lovecraft was significantly influenced by the Decadents, the Puritans, and the Aesthetic movement.[168] In «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent», Barton Levi St. Armand, a professor emeritus of English and American studies at Brown University, has argued that these three influences combined to define Lovecraft as a writer.[169] He traces this influence to both Lovecraft’s stories and letters, noting that he actively cultivated the image of a New England gentleman in his letters.[168] Meanwhile, his influence from the Decadents and the Aesthetic Movement stems from his readings of Edgar Allan Poe. Lovecraft’s aesthetic worldview and fixation on decline stems from these readings. The idea of cosmic decline is described as having been Lovecraft’s response to both the Aesthetic Movement and the 19th century Decadents.[170] St. Armand describes it as being a combination of non-theological Puritan thought and the Decadent worldview.[171] This is used as a division in his stories, particularly in «The Horror at Red Hook», «Pickman’s Model», and «The Music of Erich Zann». The division between Puritanism and Decadence, St. Armand argues, represents a polarization between an artificial paradise and oneiriscopic visions of different worlds.[172]
A non-literary inspiration came from then-contemporary scientific advances in biology, astronomy, geology, and physics.[173] Lovecraft’s study of science contributed to his view of the human race as insignificant, powerless, and doomed in a materialistic and mechanistic universe.[174] Lovecraft was a keen amateur astronomer from his youth, often visiting the Ladd Observatory in Providence, and penning numerous astronomical articles for his personal journal and local newspapers.[175] Lovecraft’s materialist views led him to espouse his philosophical views through his fiction; these philosophical views came to be called cosmicism. Cosmicism took on a more pessimistic tone with his creation of what is now known as the Cthulhu Mythos, a fictional universe that contains alien deities and horrors. The term «Cthulhu Mythos» was likely coined by later writers after Lovecraft’s death.[1] In his letters, Lovecraft jokingly called his fictional mythology «Yog-Sothothery».[176]
Dreams had a major role in Lovecraft’s literary career.[177] In 1991, as a result of his rising place in American literature, it was popularly thought that Lovecraft extensively transcribed his dreams when writing fiction. However, the majority of his stories are not transcribed dreams. Instead, many of them are directly influenced by dreams and dreamlike phenomena. In his letters, Lovecraft frequently compared his characters to dreamers. They are described as being as helpless as a real dreamer who is experiencing a nightmare. His stories also have dreamlike qualities. The Randolph Carter stories deconstruct the division between dreams and reality. The dreamlands in The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath are a shared dreamworld that can be accessed by a sensitive dreamer. Meanwhile, in «The Silver Key», Lovecraft mentions the concept of «inward dreams», which implies the existence of outward dreams. Burleson compares this deconstruction to Carl Jung’s argument that dreams are the source of archetypal myths. Lovecraft’s way of writing fiction required both a level of realism and dreamlike elements. Citing Jung, Burleson argues that a writer may create realism by being inspired by dreams.[178]
Themes
Now all my tales are based on the fundamental premise that common human laws and interests and emotions have no validity or significance in the vast cosmos-at-large. To me there is nothing but puerility in a tale in which the human form—and the local human passions and conditions and standards—are depicted as native to other worlds or other universes. To achieve the essence of real externality, whether of time or space or dimension, one must forget that such things as organic life, good and evil, love and hate, and all such local attributes of a negligible and temporary race called mankind, have any existence at all. Only the human scenes and characters must have human qualities. These must be handled with unsparing realism, (not catch-penny romanticism) but when we cross the line to the boundless and hideous unknown—the shadow-haunted Outside—we must remember to leave our humanity and terrestrialism at the threshold.
— H. P. Lovecraft, in note to the editor of Weird Tales, on resubmission of «The Call of Cthulhu»[179]
Cosmicism
The central theme of Lovecraft’s corpus is cosmicism. Cosmicism is a literary philosophy that argues that humanity is an insignificant force in the universe. Despite appearing pessimistic, Lovecraft thought of himself being as being a cosmic indifferentist, which is expressed in his fiction. In it, human beings are often subject to powerful beings and other cosmic forces, but these forces are not so much malevolent as they are indifferent toward humanity. He believed in a meaningless, mechanical, and uncaring universe that human beings could never fully understand. There is no allowance for beliefs that could not be supported scientifically.[180] Lovecraft first articulated this philosophy in 1921, but he did not fully incorporate it into his fiction until five years later. «Dagon», «Beyond the Wall of Sleep», and «The Temple» contain early depictions of this concept, but the majority of his early tales do not analyze the concept. «Nyarlathotep» interprets the collapse of human civilization as being a corollary to the collapse of the universe. «The Call of Cthulhu» represents an intensification of this theme. In it, Lovecraft introduces the idea of alien influences on humanity, which would come to dominate all subsequent works.[181] In these works, Lovecraft expresses cosmicism through the usage of confirmation rather than revelation. Lovecraftian protagonists do not learn that they are insignificant. Instead, they already know it and have it confirmed to them through an event.[182]
Knowledge
Lovecraft’s fiction reflects his own ambivalent views regarding the nature of knowledge.[183] This expresses itself in the concept of forbidden knowledge. In Lovecraft’s stories, happiness is only achievable through blissful ignorance. Trying to know things that are not meant to be known leads to harm and psychological danger. This concept intersects with several other ideas. This includes the idea that the visible reality is an illusion masking the horrific true reality. Similarly, there are also intersections with the concepts of ancient civilizations that exert a malign influence on humanity and the general philosophy of cosmicism.[184] According to Lovecraft, self-knowledge can bring ruin to those who seek it. Those seekers would become aware of their own insignificance in the wider cosmos and would be unable to bear the weight of this knowledge. Lovecraftian horror is not achieved through external phenomenon. Instead, it is reached through the internalized psychological impact that knowledge has on its protagonists. «The Call of Cthulhu», The Shadow over Innsmouth, and The Shadow Out of Time feature protagonists who experience both external and internal horror through the acquisition of self-knowledge.[185] The Case of Charles Dexter Ward also reflects this. One of its central themes is the danger of knowing too much about one’s family history. Charles Dexter Ward, the protagonist, engages in historical and genealogical research that ultimately leads to both madness and his own self-destruction.[186]
Decline of civilization
For much of his life, Lovecraft was fixated on the concepts of decline and decadence. More specifically, he thought that the West was in a state of terminal decline.[187] Starting in the 1920s, Lovecraft became familiar with the work of the German conservative-revolutionary theorist Oswald Spengler, whose pessimistic thesis of the decadence of the modern West formed a crucial element in Lovecraft’s overall anti-modern worldview.[188] Spenglerian imagery of cyclical decay is a central theme in At the Mountains of Madness. S. T. Joshi, in H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West, places Spengler at the center of his discussion of Lovecraft’s political and philosophical ideas. According to him, the idea of decline is the single idea that permeates and connects his personal philosophy. The main Spenglerian influence on Lovecraft would be his view that politics, economics, science, and art are all interdependent aspects of civilization. This realization led him to shed his personal ignorance of then-current political and economic developments after 1927.[189] Lovecraft had developed his idea of Western decline independently, but Spengler gave it a clear framework.[190]
Science
Lovecraft shifted supernatural horror away from its previous focus on human issues to a focus on cosmic ones. In this way, he merged the elements of supernatural fiction that he deemed to be scientifically viable with science fiction. This merge required an understanding of both supernatural horror and then-contemporary science.[191] Lovecraft used this combined knowledge to create stories that extensively reference trends in scientific development. Beginning with «The Shunned House», Lovecraft increasingly incorporated elements of both Einsteinian science and his own personal materialism into his stories. This intensified with the writing of «The Call of Cthulhu», where he depicted alien influences on humanity. This trend would continue throughout the remainder of his literary career. «The Colour Out of Space» represents what scholars have called the peak of this trend. It portrays an alien lifeform whose otherness prevents it from being defined by then-contemporary science.[192]
Another part of this effort was the repeated usage of mathematics in an effort to make his creatures and settings appear more alien. Tom Hull, a mathematician, regards this as enhancing his ability to invoke a sense of otherness and fear. He attributes this use of mathematics to Lovecraft’s childhood interest in astronomy and his adulthood awareness of non-Euclidean geometry.[193] Another reason for his use of mathematics was his reaction to the scientific developments of his day. These developments convinced him that humanity’s primary means of understanding the world was no longer trustable. Lovecraft’s usage of mathematics in his fiction serves to convert otherwise supernatural elements into things that have in-universe scientific explanations. «The Dreams in the Witch House» and The Shadow Out of Time both have elements of this. The former uses a witch and her familiar, while the latter uses the idea of mind transference. These elements are explained using scientific theories that were prevalent during Lovecraft’s lifetime.[194]
Lovecraft Country
Setting plays a major role in Lovecraft’s fiction. Lovecraft Country, a fictionalized version of New England, serves as the central hub for his mythos. It represents the history, culture, and folklore of the region, as interpreted by Lovecraft. These attributes are exaggerated and altered to provide a suitable setting for his stories. The names of the locations in the region were directly influenced by the names of real locations in the region, which was done to increase their realism.[195] Lovecraft’s stories use their connections with New England to imbue themselves with the ability to instill fear.[196] Lovecraft was primarily inspired by the cities and towns in Massachusetts. However, the specific location of Lovecraft Country is variable, as it moved according to Lovecraft’s literary needs. Starting with areas that he thought were evocative, Lovecraft redefined and exaggerated them under fictional names. For example, Lovecraft based Arkham on the town of Oakham and expanded it to include a nearby landmark.[197] Its location was moved, as Lovecraft decided that it would have been destroyed by the recently-built Quabbin Reservoir. This is alluded to in «The Colour Out of Space», as the «blasted heath» is submerged by the creation of a fictionalized version of the reservoir.[198] Similarly, Lovecraft’s other towns were based on other locations in Massachusetts. Innsmouth was based on Newburyport, and Dunwich was based on Greenwich. The vague locations of these towns also played into Lovecraft’s desire to create a mood in his stories. In his view, a mood can only be evoked through reading.[199]
Critical reception
Literary
Early efforts to revise an established literary view of Lovecraft as an author of ‘pulp’ were resisted by some eminent critics; in 1945, Edmund Wilson sneered: «the only real horror in most of these fictions is the horror of bad taste and bad art.» However, Wilson praised Lovecraft’s ability to write about his chosen field; he described him as having written about it «with much intelligence».[200] According to L. Sprague de Camp, Wilson later improved his opinion of Lovecraft, citing a report of David Chavchavadze that Wilson had included a Lovecraftian reference in Little Blue Light: A Play in Three Acts. After Chavchavadze met with him to discuss this, Wilson revealed that he had been reading a copy of Lovecraft’s correspondence.[f][202] Two years before Wilson’s critique, Lovecraft’s works were reviewed by Winfield Townley Scott, the literary editor of The Providence Journal. He argued that Lovecraft was one of the most significant Rhode Island authors and that it was regrettable that he had received little attention from mainstream critics at the time.[203] Mystery and Adventure columnist Will Cuppy of the New York Herald Tribune recommended to readers a volume of Lovecraft’s stories in 1944, asserting that «the literature of horror and macabre fantasy belongs with mystery in its broader sense.»[204]
By 1957, Floyd C. Gale of Galaxy Science Fiction said that Lovecraft was comparable to Robert E. Howard, stating that «they appear more prolific than ever,» noting L. Sprague de Camp, Björn Nyberg, and August Derleth’s usage of their creations.[205] Gale also said that «Lovecraft at his best could build a mood of horror unsurpassed; at his worst, he was laughable.»[205] In 1962, Colin Wilson, in his survey of anti-realist trends in fiction The Strength to Dream, cited Lovecraft as one of the pioneers of the «assault on rationality» and included him with M. R. James, H. G. Wells, Aldous Huxley, J. R. R. Tolkien and others as one of the builders of mythicised realities contending against what he considered the failing project of literary realism.[206] Subsequently, Lovecraft began to acquire the status of a cult writer in the counterculture of the 1960s, and reprints of his work proliferated.[207]
Michael Dirda, a reviewer for The Times Literary Supplement, has described Lovecraft as being a «visionary» who is «rightly regarded as second only to Edgar Allan Poe in the annals of American supernatural literature.» According to him, Lovecraft’s works prove that mankind cannot bear the weight of reality, as the true nature of reality cannot be understood by either science or history. In addition, Dirda praises Lovecraft’s ability to create an uncanny atmosphere. This atmosphere is created through the feeling of wrongness that pervades the objects, places, and people in Lovecraft’s works. He also comments favorably on Lovecraft’s correspondence, and compares him to Horace Walpole. Particular attention is given to his correspondence with August Derleth and Robert E. Howard. The Derleth letters are called «delightful», while the Howard letters are described as being an ideological debate. Overall, Dirda believes that Lovecraft’s letters are equal to, or better than, his fictional output.[208]
Los Angeles Review of Books reviewer Nick Mamatas has stated that Lovecraft was a particularly difficult author, rather than a bad one. He described Lovecraft as being «perfectly capable» in the fields of story logic, pacing, innovation, and generating quotable phrases. However, Lovecraft’s difficulty made him ill-suited to the pulps; he was unable to compete with the popular recurring protagonists and damsel-in-distress stories. Furthermore, he compared a paragraph from The Shadow Out of Time to a paragraph from the introduction to The Economic Consequences of the Peace. In Mamatas’ view, Lovecraft’s quality is obscured by his difficulty, and his skill is what has allowed his following to outlive the followings of other then-prominent authors, such as Seabury Quinn and Kenneth Patchen.[209]
In 2005, the Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works. This volume was reviewed by many publications, including The New York Times Book Review and The Wall Street Journal, and sold 25,000 copies within a month of release. The overall critical reception of the volume was mixed.[210] Several scholars, including S. T. Joshi and Alison Sperling, have said that this confirms H. P. Lovecraft’s place in the western canon.[211] The editors of The Age of Lovecraft, Carl H. Sederholm and Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, attributed the rise of mainstream popular and academic interest in Lovecraft to this volume, along with the Penguin Classics volumes and the Modern Library edition of At the Mountains of Madness. These volumes led to a proliferation of other volumes containing Lovecraft’s works. According to the two authors, these volumes are part of a trend in Lovecraft’s popular and academic reception: increased attention by one audience causes the other to also become more interested. Lovecraft’s success is, in part, the result of his success.[212]
Lovecraft’s style has often been subject to criticism,[213] but scholars such as S. T. Joshi have argued that Lovecraft consciously utilized a variety of literary devices to form a unique style of his own—these include prose-poetic rhythm, stream of consciousness, alliteration, and conscious archaism.[214] According to Joyce Carol Oates, Lovecraft and Edgar Allan Poe have exerted a significant influence on later writers in the horror genre.[215] Horror author Stephen King called Lovecraft «the twentieth century’s greatest practitioner of the classic horror tale.»[216] King stated in his semi-autobiographical non-fiction book Danse Macabre that Lovecraft was responsible for his own fascination with horror and the macabre and was the largest influence on his writing.[217]
Philosophical
H. P. Lovecraft’s writings have influenced the speculative realist philosophical movement during the early twentieth-first century. The four founders of the movement, Ray Brassier, Iain Hamilton Grant, Graham Harman, and Quentin Meillassoux, have cited Lovecraft as an inspiration for their worldviews.[218] Graham Harman wrote a monograph, Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy, about Lovecraft and philosophy. In it, he argues that Lovecraft was a «productionist» author. He describes Lovecraft as having been an author who was uniquely obsessed with gaps in human knowledge.[219] He goes further and asserts Lovecraft’s personal philosophy as being in opposition to both idealism and David Hume. In his view, Lovecraft resembles Georges Braque, Pablo Picasso, and Edmund Husserl in his division of objects into different parts that do not exhaust the potential meanings of the whole. The anti-idealism of Lovecraft is represented through his commentary on the inability of language to describe his horrors.[220] Harman also credits Lovecraft with inspiring parts of his own articulation of object-oriented ontology.[221] According to Lovecraft scholar Alison Sperling, this philosophical interpretation of Lovecraft’s fiction has caused other philosophers in Harmon’s tradition to write about Lovecraft. These philosophers seek to remove human perception and human life from the foundations of ethics. These scholars have used Lovecraft’s works as the central example of their worldview. They base this usage in Lovecraft’s arguments against anthropocentrism and the ability of the human mind to truly understand the universe. They have also played a role in Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation by focusing on his interpretation of ontology, which gives him a central position in Anthropocene studies.[222]
Legacy
H. P. Lovecraft memorial plaque at 22 Prospect Street in Providence. Portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.
Lovecraft was relatively unknown during his lifetime. While his stories appeared in prominent pulp magazines such as Weird Tales, not many people knew his name.[223] He did, however, correspond regularly with other contemporary writers such as Clark Ashton Smith and August Derleth,[224] who became his friends, even though he never met them in person. This group became known as the «Lovecraft Circle», since their writings freely borrowed Lovecraft’s motifs, with his encouragement. He borrowed from them as well. For example, he made use of Clark Ashton Smith’s Tsathoggua in The Mound.[225]
After Lovecraft’s death, the Lovecraft Circle carried on. August Derleth founded Arkham House with Donald Wandrei to preserve Lovecraft’s works and keep them in print.[226] He added to and expanded on Lovecraft’s vision, not without controversy.[227] While Lovecraft considered his pantheon of alien gods a mere plot device, Derleth created an entire cosmology, complete with a war between the good Elder Gods and the evil Outer Gods, such as Cthulhu and his ilk. The forces of good were supposed to have won, locking Cthulhu and others beneath the earth, the ocean, and elsewhere. Derleth’s Cthulhu Mythos stories went on to associate different gods with the traditional four elements of fire, air, earth, and water, which did not line up with Lovecraft’s original vision of his mythos. However, Derleth’s ownership of Arkham House gave him a position of authority in Lovecraftiana that would not dissipate until his death, and through the efforts of Lovecraft scholars in the 1970s.[228]
Lovecraft’s works have influenced many writers and other creators. Stephen King has cited Lovecraft as a major influence on his works. As a child in the 1960s, he came across a volume of Lovecraft’s works which inspired him to write his fiction. He goes on to argue that all works in the horror genre that were written after Lovecraft were influenced by him.[216] In the field of comics, Alan Moore has described Lovecraft as having been a formative influence on his graphic novels.[229] Film director John Carpenter’s films include direct references and quotations of Lovecraft’s fiction, in addition to their use of a Lovecraftian aesthetic and themes. Guillermo del Toro has been similarly influenced by Lovecraft’s corpus.[230]
The first World Fantasy Awards were held in Providence in 1975. The theme was «The Lovecraft Circle». Until 2015, winners were presented with an elongated bust of Lovecraft that was designed by cartoonist Gahan Wilson, nicknamed the «Howard».[231] In November 2015 it was announced that the World Fantasy Award trophy would no longer be modeled on H. P. Lovecraft in response to the author’s views on race.[232] After the World Fantasy Award dropped their connection to Lovecraft, The Atlantic commented that «In the end, Lovecraft still wins—people who’ve never read a page of his work will still know who Cthulhu is for years to come, and his legacy lives on in the work of Stephen King, Guillermo del Toro, and Neil Gaiman.»[231]
In 2016, Lovecraft was inducted into the Museum of Pop Culture’s Science Fiction and Fantasy Hall of Fame.[233] Three years later, Lovecraft and the other mythos authors were posthumously awarded the 1945 Retro-Hugo Award for Best Series for their contributions to the Cthulhu Mythos.[234]
Lovecraft studies
Starting in the early 1970s, a body of scholarly work began to emerge around Lovecraft’s life and works. Referred to as Lovecraft studies, its proponents sought to establish Lovecraft as a significant author in the American literary canon. This can be traced to Derleth’s preservation and dissemination of Lovecraft’s fiction, non-fiction, and letters through Arkham House. Joshi credits the development of the field to this process. However, it was marred by low quality editions and misinterpretations of Lovecraft’s worldview. After Derleth’s death in 1971, the scholarship entered a new phase. There was a push to create a book-length biography of Lovecraft. L. Sprague de Camp, a science fiction scholar, wrote the first major one in 1975. This biography was criticized by early Lovecraft scholars for its lack of scholarly merit and its lack of sympathy for its subject. Despite this, it played a significant role in Lovecraft’s literary rise. It exposed Lovecraft to the mainstream of American literary criticism. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, there was a division in the field between the «Derlethian traditionalists» who wished to interpret Lovecraft through the lens of fantasy literature and the newer scholars who wished to place greater attention on the entirety of his corpus.[235]
The 1980s and 1990s saw a further proliferation of the field. The 1990 H. P. Lovecraft Centennial Conference and the republishing of older essays in An Epicure in the Terrible represented the publishing of many basic studies that would be used as a base for then-future studies. The 1990 centennial also saw the installation of the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Plaque» in a garden adjoining John Hay Library, that features a portrait by silhouettist E. J. Perry.[236] Following this, in 1996, S. T. Joshi wrote his own biography of Lovecraft. This biography was met with positive reviews and became the main biography in the field. It has since been superseded by his expanded edition of the book, I am Providence in 2010.[237]
Lovecraft’s improving literary reputation has caused his works to receive increased attention by both classics publishers and scholarly fans.[238] His works have been published by several different series of literary classics. Penguin Classics published three volumes of Lovecraft’s works between 1999 and 2004. These volumes were edited by S. T. Joshi.[238] Barnes & Noble would publish their own volume of Lovecraft’s complete fiction in 2008. The Library of America published a volume of Lovecraft’s works in 2005. The publishing of these volumes represented a reversal of the traditional judgment that Lovecraft was not part of the Western canon.[239] Meanwhile, the biannual NecronomiCon Providence convention was first held in 2013. Its purpose is to serve as a fan and scholarly convention that discusses both Lovecraft and the wider field of weird fiction. It is organized by the Lovecraft Arts and Sciences organization and is held on the weekend of Lovecraft’s birth.[240] That July, the Providence City Council designated the «H. P. Lovecraft Memorial Square» and installed a commemorative sign at the intersection of Angell and Prospect streets, near the author’s former residences.[241]
Music
Lovecraft’s fictional Mythos has influenced a number of musicians, particularly in rock and heavy metal music.[242] This began in the 1960s with the formation of the psychedelic rock band H. P. Lovecraft, who released the albums H. P. Lovecraft and H. P. Lovecraft II in 1967 and 1968 respectively.[243] They broke up afterwards, but later songs were released. This included «The White Ship» and «At the Mountains of Madness», both titled after Lovecraft stories.[244] Extreme metal has also been influenced by Lovecraft.[245] This has expressed itself in both the names of bands and the contents of their albums. This began in 1970 with the release of Black Sabbath’s first album, Black Sabbath, which contained a song titled Behind the Wall of Sleep, deriving its name from the 1919 story «Beyond the Wall of Sleep.»[245] Heavy metal band Metallica was also inspired by Lovecraft. They recorded a song inspired by «The Call of Cthulhu», «The Call of Ktulu», and a song based on The Shadow over Innsmouth titled «The Thing That Should Not Be».[246] These songs contain direct quotations of Lovecraft’s works.[247] Joseph Norman, a speculative scholar, has argued that there are similarities between the music described in Lovecraft’s fiction and the aesthetics and atmosphere of black metal. He argues that this is evident through the «animalistic» qualities of black metal vocals. The usage of occult elements is also cited as a thematic commonality. In terms of atmosphere, he asserts that both Lovecraft’s works and extreme metal place heavy focus on creating a strong negative mood.[248]
Games
Lovecraft has also influenced gaming, despite having personally disliked games during his lifetime.[249] Chaosium’s tabletop role-playing game Call of Cthulhu, released in 1981 and currently in its seventh major edition, was one of the first games to draw heavily from Lovecraft.[250] It includes a Lovecraft-inspired insanity mechanic, which allowed for player characters to go insane from contact with cosmic horrors. This mechanic would go on to make appearance in subsequent tabletop and video games.[251] 1987 saw the release of another Lovecraftian board game, Arkham Horror, which was published by Fantasy Flight Games.[252] Though few subsequent Lovecraftian board games were released annually from 1987 to 2014, the years after 2014 saw a rapid increase in the number of Lovecraftian board games. According to Christina Silva, this revival may have been influenced by the entry of Lovecraft’s work into the public domain and a revival of interest in board games.[253] Few video games are direct adaptations of Lovecraft’s works, but many video games have been inspired or heavily influenced by Lovecraft.[251] Call of Cthulhu: Dark Corners of the Earth, a Lovecraftian first-person video game, was released in 2005.[251] It is a loose adaptation of The Shadow over Innsmouth, The Shadow Out of Time, and «The Thing on the Doorstep» that uses noir themes.[254] These adaptations focus more on Lovecraft’s monsters and gamification than they do on his themes, which represents a break from Lovecraft’s core theme of human insignificance.[255]
Religion and occultism
Several contemporary religions have been influenced by Lovecraft’s works. Kenneth Grant, the founder of the Typhonian Order, incorporated Lovecraft’s Mythos into his ritual and occult system. Grant combined his interest in Lovecraft’s fiction with his adherence to Aleister Crowley’s Thelema. The Typhonian Order considers Lovecraftian entities to be symbols through which people may interact with something inhuman.[256] Grant also argued that Crowley himself was influenced by Lovecraft’s writings, particularly in the naming of characters in The Book of the Law.[257] Similarly, The Satanic Rituals, co-written by Anton LaVey and Michael A. Aquino, includes the «Ceremony of the Nine Angles», which is a ritual that was influenced by the descriptions in «The Dreams in the Witch House». It contains invocations of several of Lovecraft’s fictional gods.[258]
There have been several books that have claimed to be an authentic edition of Lovecraft’s Necronomicon.[259] The Simon Necronomicon is one such example. It was written by an unknown figure who identified themselves as «Simon». Peter Levenda, an occult author who has written about the Necronomicon, claims that he and «Simon» came across a hidden Greek translation of the grimoire while looking through a collection of antiquities at a New York bookstore during the 1960s or 1970s.[260] This book was claimed to have borne the seal of the Necronomicon. Levenda went on to claim that Lovecraft had access to this purported scroll.[261] A textual analysis has determined that the contents of this book were derived from multiple documents that discuss Mesopotamian myth and magic. The finding of a magical text by monks is also a common theme in the history of grimoires.[262] It has been suggested that Levenda is the true author of the Simon Necronomicon.[263]
Correspondence
Although Lovecraft is known mostly for his works of weird fiction, the bulk of his writing consists of voluminous letters about a variety of topics, from weird fiction and art criticism to politics and history.[264] Lovecraft biographers L. Sprague de Camp and S. T. Joshi have estimated that Lovecraft wrote 100,000 letters in his lifetime, a fifth of which are believed to survive.[265] These letters were directed at fellow writers and members of the amateur press. His involvement in the latter was what caused him to begin writing them.[266] He included comedic elements in these letters. This included posing as an eighteenth-century gentleman and signing them with pseudonyms, most commonly «Grandpa Theobald» and «E’ch-Pi-El.»[g][268] According to Joshi, the most important sets of letters were those written to Frank Belknap Long, Clark Ashton Smith, and James F. Morton. He attributes this importance to the contents of these letters. With Long, Lovecraft argued in support and in opposition to many of Long’s viewpoints. The letters to Clark Ashton Smith are characterized by their focus on weird fiction. Lovecraft and Morton debated many scholarly subjects in their letters, resulting in what Joshi has called the «single greatest correspondence Lovecraft ever wrote.»[269]
Copyright and other legal issues
Despite several claims to the contrary, there is currently no evidence that any company or individual owns the copyright to any of Lovecraft’s works, and it is generally accepted that it has passed into the public domain.[270] Lovecraft had specified that R. H. Barlow would serve as the executor of his literary estate,[271] but these instructions were not incorporated into his will. Nevertheless, his surviving aunt carried out his expressed wishes, and Barlow was given control of Lovecraft’s literary estate upon his death. Barlow deposited the bulk of the papers, including the voluminous correspondence, in the John Hay Library, and attempted to organize and maintain Lovecraft’s other writings.[272] Lovecraft protégé August Derleth, an older and more established writer than Barlow, vied for control of the literary estate. He and Donald Wandrei, a fellow protégé and co-owner of Arkham House, falsely claimed that Derleth was the true literary executor.[273] Barlow capitulated, and later committed suicide in 1951.[274] This gave Derleth and Wandrei complete control over Lovecraft’s corpus.[275]
On October 9, 1947, Derleth purchased all rights to the stories that were published in Weird Tales. However, since April 1926 at the latest, Lovecraft had reserved all second printing rights to stories published in Weird Tales. Therefore, Weird Tales only owned the rights to at most six of Lovecraft’s tales. If Derleth had legally obtained the copyrights to these tales, there is no evidence that they were renewed before the rights expired.[276] Following Derleth’s death in 1971, Donald Wandrei sued his estate to challenge Derleth’s will, which stated that he only held the copyrights and royalties to Lovecraft’s works that were published under both his and Derleth’s names. Arkham House’s lawyer, Forrest D. Hartmann, argued that the rights to Lovecraft’s works were never renewed. Wandrei won the case, but Arkham House’s actions regarding copyright have damaged their ability to claim ownership of them.[277]
In H. P. Lovecraft: A Life, S. T. Joshi concludes that Derleth’s claims are «almost certainly fictitious» and argues that most of Lovecraft’s works that were published in the amateur press are likely in the public domain. The copyright for Lovecraft’s works would have been inherited by the only surviving heir named in his 1912 will, his aunt Annie Gamwell.[278] When she died in 1941, the copyrights passed to her remaining descendants, Ethel Phillips Morrish and Edna Lewis. They signed a document, sometimes referred to as the Morrish-Lewis gift, permitting Arkham House to republish Lovecraft’s works while retaining their ownership of the copyrights.[279] Searches of the Library of Congress have failed to find any evidence that these copyrights were renewed after the 28-year period, making it likely that these works are in the public domain.[280] However, the Lovecraft literary estate, reconstituted in 1998 under Robert C. Harrall, has claimed that they own the rights. Joshi has withdrawn his support for his conclusion, and now supports the estate’s copyright claims.[281]
Bibliography
See also
- Category:H. P. Lovecraft scholars
Explanatory notes
- ^ Lovecraft did not coin the term «Cthulhu Mythos». Instead, this term was coined by later authors.[1]
- ^ The house was later moved to 65 Prospect Street to accommodate the building of Brown University’s Art Building.[101]
- ^ He wrote several travelogues, including one on Quebec that was the longest singular work that he wrote.[107]
- ^ This is the only one of Lovecraft’s stories that was published as a book during his lifetime.[118] W. Paul Cook had previously made an abortive attempt to publish «The Shunned House» as a small book between 1927 and 1930.[119]
- ^ «Grippe» is an archaic term for influenza.[123]
- ^ L. Sprague de Camp also stated that the two men began calling each other «Monstro». This is a direct reference to the nicknames that Lovecraft gave to some of his correspondents.[201]
- ^ Lewis Theobald, Jun., the full version of Grandpa Theobald, was derived from the name of Lewis Theobald, an eighteenth-century Shakespearian scholar who was fictionalized in Alexander Pope’s The Dunciad.[267]
Citations
- ^ a b Tierney 2001, p. 52; Joshi 2010b, p. 186; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 16; de Camp 1975, p. 12; Cannon 1989, p. 1–2.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 8; de Camp 1975, p. 11; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ Joshi 2010a.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 22; de Camp 1975, pp. 15–16; Faig 1991, p. 49.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 26; de Camp 1975, p. 16; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; de Camp 1975, p. 17; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 2; Cannon 1989, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 28; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 25; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, pp. 33, 36; de Camp 1975, pp. 17–18.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 34; de Camp 1975, pp. 30–31.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 38; de Camp 1975, pp. 32; Cannon 1989, p. 2.
- ^ a b Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; St. Armand 1975, pp. 140–141.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 42; St. Armand 1972, pp. 3–4; de Camp 1975, pp. 18.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 60; de Camp 1975, p. 32.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 84.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 90; Cannon 1989, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 97; Faig 1991, p. 63.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 96; de Camp 1975, pp. 37–39; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 98; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48; Faig 1991, p. 4.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 99.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 102; de Camp 1975, p. 36.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 116; de Camp 1975, pp. 43–45; Cannon 1989, p. 15.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–53; Cannon 1989, p. 3.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 126–127; de Camp 1975, p. 27.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 127.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 128; de Camp 1975, pp. 51–52.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 128.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 66; Faig 1991, p. 65.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 67–68; de Camp 1975, p. 66; St. Armand 1972, p. 3.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 64.
- ^ Bonner 2015, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 154.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 129; de Camp 1975.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 137.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 138; de Camp 1975, p. 95.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 140; de Camp 1975, pp. 76–77.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, p. 76–77.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 145; de Camp 1975, pp. 78–79.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, pp. 145–155; de Camp 1975, p. 84.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 155; de Camp 1975, pp. 84–84.
- ^ a b Joshi 2010a, p. 159.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 164.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 165.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 168; de Camp 1975, p. 153; Cannon 1989, p. 5.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 169.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 180; de Camp 1975, p. 121.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 182; de Camp 1975, pp. 121–122.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 210; Cannon 1989, p. 6.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 273; de Camp 1975, p. 125.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 239; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 240; Cannon 1989, p. 16.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 251; de Camp 1975, pp. 125–126.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 260; de Camp 1975, p. 137.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 284; de Camp 1975, p. 122.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 303; Faig 1991, p. 66.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 300; Faig 1991, pp. 66–67.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 23; Cannon 1989, p. 3; de Camp 1975, p. 118.
- ^ a b Joshi 2001, p. 125.
- ^ a b Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2001, pp. 121–122; de Camp 1975, p. 65–66.
- ^ Hess 1971, p. 249; Joshi 2010a, p. 301; de Camp 1975, pp. 134–135.
- ^ Lovecraft 2000, p. 84.
- ^ Faig 1991, pp. 58–59; de Camp 1975, p. 135.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 306; de Camp 1975, pp. 139–141.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 308.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, p. 79; de Camp 1975, pp. 141–144; Burleson 1990, pp. 39.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; Leavenworth 2014, pp. 333–334.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 369; de Camp 1975, pp. 138–139.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 149; Burleson 1990, pp. 49, 52–53.
- ^ Burleson 1990, p. 58; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
- ^ Mosig 2001, pp. 17–18, 33; Joshi 2010a, pp. 140–142.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154; Cannon 1989, pp. 4–5.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 144–145; de Camp 1975, p. 154–156; Faig 1991, p. 67.
- ^ Joshi 2010a, p. 400; de Camp 1975, p. 152–154; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Fooy 2011; de Camp 1975, p. 184.
- ^ Everts 2012, p. 19; Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 202–203; de Camp 1975, p. 202.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 291–292; de Camp 1975, pp. 177–179, 219; Cannon 1989, p. 55.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 136; de Camp 1975, p. 219.
- ^ Fooy 2011; Cannon 1989, p. 55; Joshi 2001, p. 210.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 201–202.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 109–111; Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 112.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, p. 224.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 295–298; de Camp 1975, pp. 207–213.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001; St. Armand 1972, p. 10.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 225; de Camp 1975, p. 183.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 200–201; de Camp 1975, pp. 170–172.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 216–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 230–232.
- ^ Lovecraft 2009b.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 223–224; Norris 2020, p. 217; de Camp 1975, pp. 242–243.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Burleson 1990, p. 77.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 227–228; Moreland 2018, pp. 1–3; Cannon 1989, pp. 61–62.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 214–215.
- ^ Rubinton 2016; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ a b Joshi 1996a, p. 26; St. Armand 1972, p. 4.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270; Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–354; St. Armand 1972, pp. 10–14.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 351–353; Goodrich 2004, pp. 37–38.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, p. 117; Flood 2016.
- ^ Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8; Evans 2005, pp. 102–105.
- ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, p. 104; Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 272–273; Cannon 1989, pp. 7–8.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149, 184; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 148–149; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 307–309; Finn 2013, pp. 150–151; Vick 2021, pp. 96–102.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 273.
- ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53.
- ^ Schultz 2018, pp. 52–53; Joshi 2001, p. 255; de Camp 1975, pp. 192–194.
- ^ Greene & Scott 1948, p. 8; Joshi 1996b, p. 455.
- ^ Lovecraft 1976b; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–355.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 382–383.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 262–263.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 383–384.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Finn 2013, pp. 294–295; Vick 2021, pp. 130–137.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006c, pp. 216–218; Joshi 2001, pp. 375–376; Vick 2021, p. 143.
- ^ Lexico Dictionaries 2020.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 370, 384–385; Cannon 1989, p. 11; de Camp 1975, pp. 415–416.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388; de Camp 1975, pp. 427–428.
- ^ The Boston Globe 1937, p. 2; Joshi 2001, pp. 387–388.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 389; de Camp 1975, p. 428.
- ^ Mosig 1997, p. 114; Lovecraft 1968, pp. 50–51.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 8–16; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 9; Joshi 2016, p. 161.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 16; Joshi 2001, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 94–96.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 101–102; Pedersen 2019, pp. 119–120.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 351; Pedersen 2019, pp. 141–143.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 346.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–4; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348; Cannon 1989, pp. 10–11.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–35; Joshi 2001, pp. 346–348.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006d, pp. 85–95; Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 349–352.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354; Cannon 1989, p. 10.
- ^ Wolanin 2013, pp. 3–12; Joshi 2001, p. 354.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 360–361.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, p. 145; Hölzing 2011, pp. 182–183.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 145–146; Joshi 2001, pp. 20–23; Zeller 2019, p. 18.
- ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–174.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006a, pp. 147–148; Joshi 2001, pp. 40, 130–133.
- ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, pp. 108–110; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
- ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Evans 2005, pp. 108–109; Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–186.
- ^ Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55; Punter 1996, p. 40.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 162–163; Hambly 1996, p. viii; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Lovett-Graff 1997, pp. 183–187; Evans 2005, pp. 123–125; Klein 2012, pp. 183–184.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 221–223; Steiner 2005, pp. 54–55.
- ^ Schweitzer 1998, pp. 94–95; Evans 2005, p. 125; Joshi 2015, pp. 108–110.
- ^ Joshi 2015, p. 109.
- ^ Ransom 2015, pp. 451–452; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
- ^ Joshi 2015, p. 108–109; Evans 2005, pp. 109–110.
- ^ Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 21–24.
- ^ a b c Pedersen 2017, pp. 26–27; Joshi 2001, pp. 47–48.
- ^ Pedersen 2018, pp. 172–173; Joshi 2013, p. 263; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
- ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
- ^ Joshi 2017, pp. x–xi.
- ^ Lovecraft 2009a; Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151; Cannon 1989, pp. 101–103.
- ^ Jamneck 2012, pp. 126–151.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 135–137; Schweitzer 2018, pp. 139–143; Joshi 2013, pp. 260–261.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 253.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 168–169; Joshi 2001, pp. 228–229; St. Armand 1975, p. 142.
- ^ a b St. Armand 1975, pp. 127–128.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, p. 127.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–131.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 133–137.
- ^ St. Armand 1975, pp. 145–150.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173; Rottensteiner 1992, pp. 117–121.
- ^ Woodard 2011, p. 6; Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–173.
- ^ Lubnow 2019, pp. 3–5; Livesey 2008, pp. 3–21; Joshi 2010b, p. 174.
- ^ Lovecraft 2010, p. 97; Pedersen 2017, p. 23; de Camp 1975, p. 270.
- ^ Macrobert 2015, pp. 34–39; Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
- ^ Burleson 1991–1992, pp. 7–12.
- ^ Lovecraft 2014, p. 7.
- ^ Touponce 2013, pp. 62–63; Matthews 2018, p. 177; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–160.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 186–187; Burleson 1990, pp. 156–157.
- ^ Leiber 2001, p. 6; Lacy & Zani 2007, p. 70; Burleson 1990, pp. 158–159.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Pedersen 2017, pp. 28–33.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158.
- ^ Burleson 1990, pp. 156–158; Joshi 1996a, pp. 262–263.
- ^ St. Armand 1972, pp. 14–15; Joshi 1996a, p. 124; Cannon 1989, p. 73.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 129–130.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 314–320; St. Armand 1975, pp. 131–132.
- ^ Joshi 2016, pp. 314–320.
- ^ Joshi 2016, p. 316.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 171–172.
- ^ Joshi 2010b, pp. 183–188; Martin 2012, p. 99; Burleson 1990, pp. 107–110.
- ^ Hull 2006, pp. 10–12.
- ^ Look 2016, pp. 101–103; Halpurn & Labossiere 2009, pp. 512–513.
- ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135; St. Armand 1975, p. 129.
- ^ Butler 2014, pp. 131–135.
- ^ Murray 1986, pp. 54–67.
- ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29; Burleson 1990, pp. 106, 118.
- ^ Murray 1991–1992, pp. 19–29.
- ^ Wilson 1950, pp. 286–290.
- ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5.
- ^ de Camp 1979, p. 5; Cannon 1989, p. 126.
- ^ Scott 1943, p. 41.
- ^ Cuppy 1944, p. 10.
- ^ a b Gale 1960, pp. 100–103.
- ^ Wilson 1975, pp. 1–10.
- ^ Lovecraft 2013, pp. xiii–xiv.
- ^ Dirda 2012.
- ^ Mamatas 2014.
- ^ Lovecraft Annual 2007, p. 160; Eberhart 2005, p. 82; Grant 2005, p. 146.
- ^ Joshi 2015, pp. 105–116; Sperling 2016, p. 75; Hantke 2013, pp. 137–138.
- ^ Sederholm & Weinstock 2016, pp. 2, 8–9.
- ^ Gray 2014; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 91, 252.
- ^ Oates 1996.
- ^ a b Wohleber 1995.
- ^ King 1987, p. 63.
- ^ Peak 2020, pp. 169–172; Elfren 2016.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Peak 2020, pp. 177–178.
- ^ Harman 2012, pp. 3–4; Powell 2019, p. 263; Elfren 2016, pp. 88–89.
- ^ Sperling 2016, pp. 75–78.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; Dirda 2005; Cannon 1989, p. 1.
- ^ Schoell 2004, pp. 8–40.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 141–142.
- ^ Joshi 2001, pp. 390–391; de Camp 1975, p. 132; Hantke 2013, p. 135–136.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52–53; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
- ^ Tierney 2001, p. 52; de Camp 1975, pp. 434–435; Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64.
- ^ Talbot 2014.
- ^ Janicker 2015, pp. 473; Norris 2018, pp. 158–159; Nelson 2012, pp. 221–222.
- ^ a b Cruz 2015.
- ^ Flood 2015.
- ^ Locus Online 2017.
- ^ The Hugo Awards 2020.
- ^ Joshi 1984, pp. 62–64; Joshi 1985a, pp. 19–25; Joshi 1985b, pp. 54–58.
- ^ Rubinton 2016; Joshi 2001, pp. 219.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 5–6; Oates 1996; Mariconda 2010, pp. 208–209.
- ^ a b Hantke 2013, p. 138; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Dziemianowicz 2010; Peak 2020, p. 163; Dirda 2005.
- ^ Siclen 2015; Smith 2017; Dirda 2019.
- ^ Bilow 2013.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, p. 7; Sederholm 2016, pp. 266–267.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24; Sederholm 2016, p. 271.
- ^ Hill & Joshi 2006, pp. 19–24.
- ^ a b Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
- ^ Griwkowsky 2008; Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272; Norman 2013, pp. 193–194.
- ^ Sederholm 2016, pp. 271–272.
- ^ Norman 2013, pp. 197–202.
- ^ Lovecraft 1976a, p. 13; Carbonell 2019, p. 137.
- ^ Carbonell 2019, p. 160; Gollop 2017; Garrad 2021, p. 25.
- ^ a b c Gollop 2017.
- ^ Gollop 2017; Silva 2017; Garrad 2021, pp. 26–27.
- ^ Silva 2017.
- ^ Garrad 2021, pp. 27–28.
- ^ Garrad 2021, p. 28.
- ^ Engle 2014, pp. 89–90; Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
- ^ Engle 2014, p. 89–90.
- ^ Engle 2014, p. 91.
- ^ Clore 2001, pp. 61–69.
- ^ Levenda 2014.
- ^ Matthews 2018, pp. 178–179.
- ^ Davies 2009, p. 268.
- ^ Flatley 2013.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242; Cannon 1989, p. 10; de Camp 1975, p. xii.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. xii; Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–237.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–239.
- ^ Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; Wetzel 1983, pp. 19–20.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 245–246; Joshi & Schultz 2001, pp. 217–218; de Camp 1975, pp. 113–114.
- ^ Joshi 1996a, pp. 236–242.
- ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 12.
- ^ Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641.
- ^ Joshi 2001, p. 390; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641; de Camp 1975, p. 430–432; Wetzel 1983, pp. 4–6.
- ^ de Camp 1975, p. 432; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, pp. 10–12.
- ^ Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights; Wetzel 1983, p. 11.
- ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 640–641.
- ^ Karr 2018, The «Donald Wandrei v. The Estate of August Derleth» Hypothesis.
- ^ Joshi 1996b, p. 640; Lovecraft 2006b, p. 237; Karr 2018, Arkham House Publishers and the H.P. Lovecraft Copyrights.
- ^ Karr 2018, The Arkham House Copyright Hypothesis; Joshi 1996b, p. 641; Wetzel 1983, pp. 24–25.
- ^ Karr 2018, Conclusion; Wetzel 1983, p. 25.
- ^ Karr 2018, Coda.
General and cited sources
- «1945 Retro-Hugo Awards». The Hugo Awards. 2020. Archived from the original on August 1, 2020.
- «2016 SF&F Hall of Fame Inductees». Locus Online. January 17, 2017. Archived from the original on December 22, 2019.
- Bilow, Michael (July 27, 2013). «We are Providence: The H.P. Lovecraft Community». Motif Magazine. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013.
- Bonner, Marian F. (2015). «Miscellaneous Impressions of H.P.L.». Lovecraft Annual (9): 52–53. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868496.
- «Briefly Noted». Lovecraft Annual (1): 160. 2007. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868367.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1990). Lovecraft: Disturbing the Universe (First ed.). Lexington, Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9319-9. JSTOR j.ctt130jf9h. OCLC 895675279.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1991–1992). «Lovecraft: Dreams and Reality». Books at Brown. 38–39: 7–12. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
- Butler, James O. (2014). «Terror and Terrain: The Environmental Semantics of Lovecraft County». Lovecraft Annual (8): 131–149. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868485.
- Cannon, Peter (1989). H. P. Lovecraft. Twayne’s United States Authors Series. Vol. 549. Boston: Twayne. ISBN 0-8057-7539-0. OCLC 246440364.
- Carbonell, Curtis D. (2019). «Lovecraft’s (Cthulhu) Mythos». Dread Trident: Tabletop Role-Playing Games and the Modern Fantastic. Liverpool University Press. pp. 137–165. doi:10.3828/liverpool/9781789620573.003.0005. ISBN 978-1-78962-468-7. JSTOR j.ctv12pntt4.8. OCLC 1155494616. S2CID 219891871.
- Clore, Dan (n.d.) [first published Fall 2001]. «The Lurker on the Threshold of Interpretation: Hoax Necronomicons and Paratextual Noise». Lovecraft Studies (42–43): 61–69. ISSN 0899-8361. Archived from the original on October 26, 2009 – via Yahoo! GeoCities.
- Cruz, Lenika (November 12, 2015). «‘Political Correctness’ Won’t Ruin H.P. Lovecraft’s Legacy». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015.
- Cuppy, Will (January 2, 1944). «Review of Beyond the Wall of Sleep». New York Herald Tribune. p. 10. ISSN 1941-0646.
- Davies, Owen (2009). Grimoires: A History of Magic Books. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-150924-7. OCLC 434863058.
- de Camp, L. Sprague (March 1979). «H. P. Lovecraft and Edmund Wilson». Fantasy Mongers. No. 1. ISSN 8755-7479.
- de Camp, L. Sprague (1975). Lovecraft: A Biography (First ed.). Garden City, New York: Doubleday. ISBN 0-385-00578-4. OCLC 979196. S2CID 190754775.
- Dirda, Michael (2012). «Cthulhu for President». The Times Literary Supplement. Archived from the original on June 30, 2020.
- Dirda, Michael (September 4, 2019). «Dispatch from a ‘Horror’ Convention: It Began in a Dark, Candlelit Room . . «. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. ProQuest 2284363189. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Dirda, Michael (March 7, 2005). «The Horror, the Horror!». The Weekly Standard. ISSN 1083-3013. Archived from the original on November 5, 2009.
- Dziemianowicz, Stefan (July 12, 2010). «Terror Eternal: The Enduring Popularity of H. P. Lovecraft». Publishers Weekly. ISSN 0000-0019. ProQuest 609957378.
- Eberhart, John Mark (February 13, 2005). «The Library of Lovecraft». The Kansas City Star. p. 82. ISSN 0745-1067. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Elfren, Isabella van (2016). «Hyper-Cacophony: Lovecraft, Speculative Realism, and Sonic Materialism». In Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (eds.). The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 79–96. ISBN 978-0-8166-9925-4. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.8. OCLC 945632985. S2CID 194316992.
- Engle, John (October 15, 2014). «Cults of Lovecraft: The Impact of H.P. Lovecraft’s Fiction on Contemporary Occult Practices». Mythlore. 33 (125): 85–98. JSTOR 26815942. S2CID 159074285 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
- Evans, Timothy H. (2005). «A Last Defense against the Dark: Folklore, Horror, and the Uses of Tradition in the Works of H. P. Lovecraft». Journal of Folklore Research. 42 (1): 99–135. doi:10.2979/JFR.2005.42.1.99. ISSN 0737-7037. JSTOR 3814792. S2CID 162356996.
- Everts, R. Alain (June 22, 2012) [first published July 1974]. «Howard Phillips Lovecraft and Sex: or The Sex Life of a Gentleman». Nyctalops. Vol. 2, no. 2. p. 19. Archived from the original on October 25, 2019 – via The H. P. Lovecraft Archive.
- Faig, Kenneth W. Jr. (1991). «The Parents of Howard Phillips Lovecraft». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). An Epicure in the Terrible: A Centennial Anthology of Essays in Honor of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). Madison, New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. pp. 45–77. ISBN 0-8386-3415-X. OCLC 22766987.
- Finn, Mark (2013). Blood and Thunder: The Life and Art of Robert E. Howard (Third ed.). Cross Plains, Texas: Robert E. Howard Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-304-03152-5. OCLC 923870328.
- Flatley, Joseph L. (November 12, 2013). «The Cult of Cthulhu: Real Prayer for a Fake Tentacle». The Verge. Archived from the original on October 29, 2019.
- Flood, Alison (March 16, 2016). «Lost HP Lovecraft Work Commissioned by Houdini Escapes Shackles of History». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on October 8, 2016.
- Flood, Alison (November 9, 2015). «World Fantasy Award Drops HP Lovecraft as Prize Image». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 18, 2015.
- Fooy, Frederick (October 27, 2011). «Resident Horror Genius». South Brooklyn Post. Archived from the original on August 2, 2016.
- Gale, Floyd C. (April 1960). «Galaxy’s 5 Star Shelf». Galaxy Science Fiction. pp. 100–103.
- Garrad, Jonathan (November 15, 2021). «Gamifying Fictions of Defeat: Adaptations of Lovecraft to Games Media». Studies in Gothic Fiction. 7: 20–29. ISSN 2156-2407.
- Gollop, Julian (November 16, 2017). «The Gollop Chamber: Where Are All the Lovecraftian Games?». PC Gamer. Archived from the original on March 7, 2018.
- Goodrich, Peter (2004). «Mannerism and the Macabre in H. P. Lovecraft’s Dunsanian ‘Dream-Quest’«. Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 15 (1 (57)): 37–48. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 43308683.
- Grant, Gavin J. (April 17, 2005). «That Delicious Feeling of Dread». The Los Angeles Times. p. 146. ISSN 0458-3035. Archived from the original on December 16, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Gray, John (October 24, 2014). «Weird Realism: John Gray on the Moral Universe of H P Lovecraft». New Statesman. ISSN 1758-924X. Archived from the original on April 14, 2016.
- Greene, Sonia; Scott, Winfield Townley (August 22, 1948). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft as His Wife Remembers Him». The Providence Journal. p. 8. ISSN 2574-3406. Archived from the original on May 12, 2022.
- Griwkowsky, Fish (December 8, 2008). «Interview with James Hetfield». Jam.canoe.ca. Archived from the original on May 24, 2012.
- «Grippe». Lexico Dictionaries. Archived from the original on January 23, 2020. Retrieved January 23, 2020.
- Halpurn, Paul; Labossiere, Michael C. (2009). «Mind Out of Time: Identity, Perception, and the Fourth Dimension in H. P. Lovecraft’s ‘The Shadow Out of Time’ and ‘The Dreams in the Witch House’«. Extrapolation. 50 (3): 512–533, 375. doi:10.3828/extr.2009.50.3.8. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 162319821. ProQuest 2152642098.
- Hambly, Barbara (1996). «Introduction: The Man Who Loved His Craft». The Transition of H. P. Lovecraft: The Road to Madness (First ed.). New York: Ballantine Books. pp. vii–x. ISBN 0-345-38422-9. OCLC 34669226.
- Hantke, Steffen (2013). «From the Library of America to the Mountains of Madness: Recent Discourse on H. P. Lovecraft». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 135–156. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_9. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 163339940.
- Harman, Graham (2012). Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78099-907-4. OCLC 1058277738.
- Hess, Clara (1971). «Addenda to ‘H.P.L.: A Memoir’«. In Derleth, August (ed.). Something about Cats, and Other Pieces (First ed.). Books for Libraries Press. pp. 247–277. ISBN 0-8369-2410-X. OCLC 222440.
- Hill, Gary; Joshi, S. T. (2006). The Strange Sound of Cthulhu: Music Inspired by the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft. United States: Music Street Journal. ISBN 978-1-84728-776-2. OCLC 128175889.
- Hölzing, Roland (2011). «Lovecraft: A Gentleman without Five Senses». Lovecraft Annual (5): 181–187. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868439.
- Hull, Thomas (2006). «H.P. Lovecraft: A Horror in Higher Dimensions». Math Horizons. Vol. 13, no. 3. pp. 10–12. doi:10.1080/10724117.2006.11974625. ISSN 1072-4117. JSTOR 25678597.
- Jamneck, Lynne (2012). «Tekeli-li! Disturbing Language in Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (6): 126–151. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868454.
- Janicker, Rebecca (2015). «Visions of Monstrosity: Lovecraft, Adaptation and the Comics Arts». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 469–488. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321171.
- Joshi, S. T. (2001). A Dreamer and a Visionary: H. P. Lovecraft in His Time. Liverpool Science Fiction Texts and Studies. Vol. 26 (First ed.). Liverpool University Press. doi:10.5949/upo9781846312991. ISBN 978-1-84631-299-1. JSTOR j.ctt5vjhg7. OCLC 276177497.
- Joshi, S. T. (1996a). A Subtler Magick: The Writings and Philosophy of H.P. Lovecraft (Third ed.). Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-61-0. OCLC 4566934. S2CID 169172551.
- Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (2001). An H.P. Lovecraft Encyclopedia (First ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 0-313-01682-8. OCLC 608158798.
- Joshi, S. T. (2015). «Charles Baxter on Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (9): 105–122. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868501.
- Joshi, S. T. (2013). «Lovecraft’s ‘Dunsanian Studies’«. In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Critical Essays on Lord Dunsany. Scarecrow Press. pp. 241–264. ISBN 978-0-8108-9235-4. OCLC 1026953908.
- Joshi, S. T. (1996b). H. P. Lovecraft: A Life (First ed.). West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. ISBN 0-940884-89-5. OCLC 34906142.
- Joshi, S. T. (2016). H. P. Lovecraft: The Decline of the West (First ed.). Wildside Press. ISBN 978-1-4794-2754-3. OCLC 988396691.
- Joshi, S. T. (2010a). I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-0-9824296-7-9. OCLC 650504348. S2CID 190428196.
- Joshi, S. T. (1984). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies 1971–1982 (Part I)». Lovecraft Studies. 3 (2): 62–71. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (1985a). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part II)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (1): 18–28. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (1985b). «The Development of Lovecraftian Studies, 1971–1982 (Part III)». Lovecraft Studies. 4 (2): 54–65. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Joshi, S. T. (2017). «Foreword». In Moreland, Sean (ed.). The Lovecraftian Poe: Essays on Influence, Reception, Interpretation, and Transformation. Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: Lehigh University Press. pp. ix–xiv. ISBN 978-1-61146-241-8. OCLC 973481779.
- Joshi, S. T. (2010b). «Time, Space, and Natural Law: Science and Pseudo-Science in Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (4): 171–201. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868421.
- Karr, Chris J. (July 10, 2018). «The Black Seas of Copyright». Aetherial. Archived from the original on April 25, 2020.
- King, Stephen (1987). Danse Macabre. Berkley. ISBN 0-425-06462-X. OCLC 10242612. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
- Klein, Anna (2012). «Misperceptions of Malignity: Narrative Form and the Threat to America’s Modernity in ‘The Shadow over Innsmouth’«. Lovecraft Annual (6): 182–198. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868459.
- Lacy, Jeff; Zani, Steven J. (2007). «The Negative Mystics of the Mechanistic Sublime: Walter Benjamin and Lovecraft’s Cosmicism». Lovecraft Annual (1): 65–83. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868355. S2CID 11647892.
- Leavenworth, Van (2014). «The Developing Storyworld of H. P. Lovecraft». In Ryan, Marie-Laure; Thon, Jan-Noël (eds.). Storyworlds Across Media: Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology. Frontiers of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. pp. 332–350. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. ISBN 978-0-8032-5532-6. JSTOR j.ctt1d9nkdg.20. OCLC 880964681. S2CID 190258640.
- Leiber, Fritz (2001) [first published 1949]. «A Literary Copernicus». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft (Revised ed.). Holicong, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 7–16. ISBN 1-58715-470-6. OCLC 48212283.
- Levenda, Peter (November 30, 2014). «Finding the Simon Necronomicon». The Lip TV. Archived from the original on February 6, 2022 – via YouTube.
- Livesey, T. R. (2008). «Dispatches from the Providence Observatory: Astronomical Motifs and Sources in the Writings of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (2): 3–87. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868370.
- Look, Daniel M. (2016). «Queer Geometry and Higher Dimensions: Mathematics in the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (10): 101–120. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868515.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2010) [written November 22, 1930]. «Religion and Indeterminacy». In Joshi, S. T.; Hitchens, Christopher (eds.). Against Religion: The Atheist Writings of H.P. Lovecraft. New York: Sporting Gentlemen. pp. 87–99. ISBN 978-0-578-05248-9. OCLC 665081122.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009a). «At the Mountains of Madness». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on February 25, 2017.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006a) [first published February 1922]. «A Confession of Unfaith». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 145–148. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006b). «Instructions in Case of Decease». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 237–240. ISBN 978-0-9721644-1-2. OCLC 875361303.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006c) [first published 1936]. «In Memoriam: Robert Ervin Howard». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 216–218. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2006d) [written February 22, 1933]. «Some Repetitions on the Times». In Joshi, S. T. (ed.). Collected Essays. Vol. 5 (First ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. pp. 85–95. ISBN 978-0976159230. OCLC 54350507.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (August 20, 2009b). «He». The H. P. Lovecraft Archive. Archived from the original on March 23, 2021.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2014). Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). «Letters to Farnsworth Wright». Lovecraft Annual (8): 5–59. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868482.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2000). «Amateur Journalism». In Joshi, S. T.; Schultz, David E. (eds.). Lord of a Visible World: An Autobiography in Letters. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press. pp. 39–86. ISBN 0-8214-1332-5. OCLC 43567292.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1968) [sent May 16, 1926]. «To James F. Morton». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. II. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 50–51. ISBN 0-87054-034-3. OCLC 1152654519.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1976a). Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. IV. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-035-1. OCLC 20590805.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1976b) [sent February 7, 1937]. «To Catherine L. Moore». In Derleth, August; Wandrei, Donald (eds.). Selected Letters. Vol. V. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. pp. 407–408. ISBN 0-87054-036-X. OCLC 1000556488.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2013). Luckhurst, Roger (ed.). The Classic Horror Stories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-164088-9. OCLC 958573276. S2CID 190969085.
- Lovett-Graff, Bennett (1997). «Shadows over Lovecraft: Reactionary Fantasy and Immigrant Eugenics». Extrapolation. 38 (3): 175–192. doi:10.3828/extr.1997.38.3.175. ISSN 0014-5483. S2CID 164434496. ProQuest 234914041.
- Lubnow, Fred S. (2019). «The Lovecraftian Solar System». Lovecraft Annual (13): 3–26. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868571.
- Macrobert, Franch A. (2015). «Cosmic Dread: The Astronomy of H. P. Lovecraft». Sky & Telescope. Vol. 129, no. 2. pp. 34–39. ISSN 0037-6604.
- Mamatas, Nick (November 24, 2014). «The Real Mr. Difficult, or Why Cthulhu Threatens to Destroy the Canon, Self-Interested Literary Essayists, and the Universe Itself. Finally». Los Angeles Review of Books. Archived from the original on June 15, 2016.
- Mariconda, Steven J. (2010). «Review of I Am Providence: The Life and Times of H. P. Lovecraft«. Lovecraft Annual (4): 208–215. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868424.
- Martin, Sean Elliot (2012). «Lovecraft, Absurdity, and the Modernist Grotesque». Lovecraft Annual (6): 82–112. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868452.
- Matthews, Carol S. (April 15, 2018). «Letting Sleeping Abnormalities Lie: Lovecraft and the Futility of Divination». Mythlore. 36 (2): 165–184. JSTOR 26809310. S2CID 165217534. ProQuest 2036317509 – via SWOSU Digital Commons.
- Moreland, Sean (2018). «Introduction: The Critical (After)Life of Supernatural Horror in Literature«. New Directions in Supernatural Horror Literature: The Critical Influence of H. P. Lovecraft. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95477-6_1. ISBN 978-3-319-95477-6.
- Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (1997). «Life After Lovecraft: Reminiscences of a Non-Entity». Mosig at Last: A Psychologist Looks at H.P. Lovecraft. West Warwick, Rhode Island: Necronomicon Press. pp. 111–116. ISBN 978-0-940884-90-8. OCLC 681921217.
- Mosig, Yōzan Dirk W. (2001) [first published 1974]. «The Four Faces of the Outsider». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 17–34. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
- Murray, Will (October 1, 1986). «In Search of Arkham Country». Lovecraft Studies. 5 (2): 54–67. ISSN 0899-8361.
- Murray, Will (1991–1992). «Lovecraft’s Arkham Country». Books at Brown. 38–39: 19–29. ISSN 0147-0787. Archived from the original on April 20, 2021 – via Brown Digital Repository.
- Nelson, Victoria (2012). «Cathedral Head: The Gothick Cosmos of Guillermo del Toro». Gothicka. Harvard University Press. pp. 219–237. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674065406.c10. ISBN 978-0-674-05014-3. JSTOR j.ctt24hj8c.13. S2CID 191845332.
- Norman, Joseph (2013). «‘Sounds Which Filled Me with an Indefinable Dread’: The Cthulhu Mythopoeia of H. P. Lovecraft in ‘Extreme’ Metal». In Simmons, David (ed.). New Critical Essays on H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 193–208. doi:10.1057/9781137320964_11. ISBN 978-1-137-32096-4. OCLC 5576363673. S2CID 192763998.
- Norris, Duncan (2018). «The Void: A Lovecraftian Analysis». Lovecraft Annual (12): 149–164. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868564.
- Norris, Duncan (2020). «Zeitgeist and Untoten: Lovecraft and the Walking Dead». Lovecraft Annual (14): 189–240. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26939817.
- «Notable Persons Interred at Swan Point Cemetery». Swan Point Cemetery. Archived from the original on January 22, 2016.
- Oates, Joyce Carol (October 31, 1996). «The King of Weird». The New York Review of Books. Vol. 43, no. 17. ISSN 0028-7504. Archived from the original on September 10, 2009.
- Peak, David (2020). «Horror of the Real: H.P. Lovecraft’s Old Ones and Contemporary Speculative Philosophy». In Rosen, Matt (ed.). Diseases of the Head: Essays on the Horrors of Speculative Philosophy. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. pp. 163–180. doi:10.2307/j.ctv19cwdpb.7. ISBN 978-1-953035-10-3. JSTOR j.ctv19cwdpb.7. OCLC 1227264756. S2CID 229019856.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2018). «Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Romantic on the Nightside». Lovecraft Annual (12): 165–173. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868565.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2019). ««Now Will You Be Good?»: Lovecraft, Teetotalism, and Philosophy». Lovecraft Annual (13): 119–144. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868581.
- Pedersen, Jan B. W. (2017). «On Lovecraft’s Lifelong Relationship with Wonder». Lovecraft Annual (11): 23–36. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868530.
- Powell, Anna (2019). «Thinking the Thing: The Outer Reaches of Knowledge in Lovecraft and Deleuze». In Hogle, Jerrold E.; Miles, Robert (eds.). The Gothic and Theory: An Edinburgh Companion. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 260–278. doi:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474427777.003.0014. ISBN 978-1-4744-2777-7. JSTOR 10.3366/j.ctvggx38r.17. OCLC 1145928444. S2CID 213917604.
- Punter, David (1996). The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the Present Day. Vol. II. New York: Longman. ISBN 0-582-23714-9. OCLC 1072397754.
- Ransom, Amy J. (2015). «Lovecraft in Quebec: Transcultural Fertilization and Esther Rochon’s Reevaluation of the Powers of Horror». Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts. 26 (3 (94)): 450–468. ISSN 0897-0521. JSTOR 26321170. S2CID 165970090. ProQuest 1861072902.
- Rottensteiner, Franz (1992). «Lovecraft as Philosopher». Science Fiction Studies. 19 (1): 117–121. JSTOR 4240129.
- Rubinton, Noel (August 10, 2016). «How to Find the Spirit of H.P. Lovecraft in Providence». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. ProQuest 1810306270. Archived from the original on October 13, 2018.
- Sederholm, Carl H. (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft, Heavy Metal, and Cosmicism». Rock Music Studies. 3 (3): 266–280. doi:10.1080/19401159.2015.1121644. ISSN 1940-1159. S2CID 194537597.
- Sederholm, Carl H.; Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew (2016). «Introduction: Lovecraft Rising». The Age of Lovecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 1–42. ISBN 978-1-4529-5023-5. JSTOR 10.5749/j.ctt1b9x1f3.5. OCLC 945632985.
- Schoell, William (2004). H.P. Lovecraft: Master of Weird Fiction (First ed.). Greensboro, North Carolina: Morgan Reynolds. ISBN 1-931798-15-X. OCLC 903506614.
- Schultz, David E. (2018). «‘Whaddya Make Them Eyes at Me For?’: Lovecraft and Book Publishers». Lovecraft Annual (12): 51–65. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868555.
- Schweitzer, Darrell (2018). «Lovecraft, Aristeas, Dunsany, and the Dream Journey». Lovecraft Annual (12): 136–143. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868561.
- Schweitzer, Darrell (1998). Windows of the Imagination: Essays on Fantastic Literature. Berkeley Heights, New Jersey: Wildside Press. ISBN 1-880448-60-2. OCLC 48566644. S2CID 190964524.
- Scott, Winfield Townley (December 26, 1943). «The Case of Howard Phillips Lovecraft of Providence, R.I.» The Providence Journal. p. 41. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved August 23, 2021 – via GenealogyBank.com.
- Siclen, Bill Van (August 16, 2015). «NecronomiCon Providence to celebrate life and work of H. P. Lovecraft». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Silva, Christianna (June 7, 2017). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Monster Is Wrapping Family Game Night Up In Tentacles». National Public Radio. Archived from the original on February 28, 2018.
- Smith, Andy (August 16, 2017). «NecronomiCon, homage to H. P. Lovecraft, returns to Providence». The Providence Journal. ISSN 2574-3406. Retrieved June 16, 2021.
- Sperling, Alison (2016). «H. P. Lovecraft’s Weird Body». Lovecraft Annual (10): 75–100. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868514.
- St. Armand, Barton Levi (1972). «Facts in the Case of H. P. Lovecraft» (PDF). Rhode Island History. 31 (1): 3–20. ISSN 0035-4619 – via Rhode Island Historical Society.
- St. Armand, Barton Levi (1975). «H. P. Lovecraft: New England Decadent». Caliban. 12 (1): 127–155. doi:10.3406/calib.1975.1046. eISSN 2431-1766. S2CID 220649713.
- Steiner, Bernd (2005). H. P. Lovecraft and the Literature of the Fantastic: Explorations in a Literary Genre. Munich: GRIN Verlag. ISBN 978-3-638-84462-8. OCLC 724541939.
- Talbot, Nick (August 31, 2014). «All About Alienation: Alan Moore On Lovecraft And Providence». The Quietus.
- Tierney, Richard L. (2001) [first published 1972]. «The Derleth Mythos». In Schweitzer, Darrell (ed.). Discovering H. P. Lovecraft. Holicog, Pennsylvania: Wildside Press. pp. 52–53. ISBN 978-1-4344-4912-2. OCLC 114786517.
- Touponce, William F. (2013). Lord Dunsany, H. P. Lovecraft, and Ray Bradbury: Spectral Journeys. Studies in Supernatural Literature. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-9220-0. OCLC 873404866.
- Vick, Todd B. (2021). Renegades and Rogues: The Life and Legacy of Robert E. Howard. Austin: University of Texas Press. doi:10.7560/321959. ISBN 978-1-4773-2195-9. OCLC 1159658615. S2CID 241275357.
- Wetzel, George T. (1983). The Lovecraft Scholar (PDF). Darien, Connecticut: Hobgoblin Press.
- Wilson, Colin (1975). The Strength to Dream: Literature and the Imagination (Second ed.). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-8371-6819-7. OCLC 630646359.
- Wilson, Edmund (1950) [first published November 24, 1945]. «Tales of the Marvellous and the Ridiculous». Classics and Commercials: A Literary Chronicle of the Forties. New York: Macmillan. pp. 286–290. ISBN 0-374-52667-2. OCLC 964373.
- Wohleber, Curt (December 1995). «The Man Who Can Scare Stephen King». American Heritage. Vol. 46, no. 8. Archived from the original on October 4, 2013.
- Wolanin, Tyler L. (2013). «New Deal Politics in the Correspondence of H. P. Lovecraft». Lovecraft Annual (7): 3–35. ISSN 1935-6102. JSTOR 26868464.
- Woodard, Ben (2011). «Mad Speculation and Absolute Inhumanism: Lovecraft, Ligotti, and the Weirding of Philosophy». Continent. 1 (1): 3–13. doi:10.22394/0869-5377-2019-5-203-225. ISSN 2159-9920. S2CID 170136177.
- «Wrote of His Last Month Alive». The Boston Globe. March 15, 1937. p. 2. ISSN 0743-1791. Archived from the original on February 28, 2020 – via Newspapers.com.
- Zeller, Benjamin E. (December 2019). «Altar Call of Cthulhu: Religion and Millennialism in H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos». Religions. 11 (1): 18. doi:10.3390/rel11010018. ISSN 2077-1444. S2CID 213736759.
Further reading
- Anderson, James Arthur; Joshi, S. T. (2011). Out of the Shadows: A Structuralist Approach to Understanding the Fiction of H. P. Lovecraft. Rockville, Maryland: Wildside Press. doi:10.23860/diss-anderson-james-1992. ISBN 978-1-4794-0384-4. OCLC 1127558354. S2CID 171675509.
- Burleson, Donald R. (1983). H. P. Lovecraft: A Critical Study. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-23255-8. OCLC 299389026. S2CID 190394934.
- Callaghan, Gavin (2013). H. P. Lovecraft’s Dark Arcadia: The Satire, Symbology and Contradiction. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 978-1-4766-0239-4. OCLC 856844361.
- Cannon, Peter, ed. (1998). Lovecraft Remembered. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 978-0-87054-173-5. OCLC 260088015.
- Carter, Lin (1972). Lovecraft: A Look Behind the «Cthulhu Mythos». New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-586-04166-4. OCLC 2213597. S2CID 190363598.
- Frierson, Meade; Frierson, Penny (March 1972). HPL: A Tribute to Howard Phillips Lovecraft (PDF). Birmingham, Alabama: Meade and Penny Frierson. OCLC 315586.
- González Grueso, Fernando Darío (2017). La ficción científica. Género, Poética y sus relaciones con la literatura oral tradicional: El papel de H. P. Lovecraft como mediador. Colección Estudios (in Spanish). Madrid: UAM Ediciones. doi:10.15366/ficcion.cientif2013. ISBN 978-84-8344-376-7. OCLC 1026295184. S2CID 183258592.
- Hegyi, Pál (2019). Lovecraft Laughing: Uncanny Memes in the Weird. Department of American Studies, University of Szeged. doi:10.14232/americana.books.2019.hegyi.lovecraft. ISBN 978-615-5423-56-7. OCLC 8160851320. S2CID 192043054.
- Houellebecq, Michel; King, Stephen (2005). H. P. Lovecraft: Against the World, Against Life. Translated by Khazeni, Dorna. Cernunnos. ISBN 1-932416-18-8. OCLC 1151841813. S2CID 190374730.
- Joshi, S. T. (1980). H. P. Lovecraft, Four Decades of Criticism (First ed.). Athens: Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-0442-3. OCLC 6085440.
- Klinger, Leslie S. (2014). The New Annotated H. P. Lovecraft (First ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-87140-453-4. OCLC 884500241. S2CID 218735034.
- Lévy, Maurice (1988) [first published 1972]. Lovecraft: A Study in the Fantastic. Translated by Joshi, S. T. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-1956-7. OCLC 491484555. S2CID 190967971.
- Long, Frank Belknap (1975). Howard Phillips Lovecraft: Dreamer on the Nightside. Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House. ISBN 0-87054-068-8. OCLC 2034623. S2CID 160306366.
- Ludueña, Fabián; de Acosta, Alejandro (2015). H. P. Lovecraft: The Disjunction in Being. Translated by de Acosta, Alejandro. United States: Schism. ISBN 978-1-5058-6600-1. OCLC 935704008.
- Lovecraft, H. P.; Conover, Willis; Joshi, S. T. (2002). Lovecraft at Last: The Master of Horror in His Own Words (Revised ed.). New York: Cooper Square Press. ISBN 0-8154-1212-6. OCLC 50212624.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1999). Joshi, S. T.; Cannon, Peter (eds.). More Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50875-4. OCLC 41231274.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (1997). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated H. P. Lovecraft. New York: Dell. ISBN 0-440-50660-3. OCLC 36165172.
- Lovecraft, H. P. (2012). Joshi, S. T. (ed.). The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature (Second ed.). New York: Hippocampus Press. ISBN 978-1-61498-028-5. OCLC 855115722.
- Shapiro, Stephen; Philip, Barnard (2017). Pentecostal Modernism: Lovecraft, Los Angeles and World-Systems Culture. New Directions in Religion and Literature. Bloomsbury Publishing. doi:10.5040/9781474238762. ISBN 978-1-4742-3873-1. OCLC 1065524061. S2CID 148868506.
- Martin, Sean Elliot (December 2008). H.P. Lovecraft and the Modernist Grotesque (PhD thesis). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University. ISBN 9781448610167. OCLC 601419113. S2CID 191576874.
- Migliore, Andrew; Strysik, John (2006). The Lurker in the Lobby: A Guide to the Cinema of H. P. Lovecraft. Portland, Oregon: Night Shade Books. ISBN 978-1-892389-35-0. OCLC 1023313647. S2CID 152612871.
- Montaclair, Florent; Picot, Jean-Pierre (1997). Fantastique et événement : Étude comparée des œuvres de Jules Verne et Howard P. Lovecraft. Annales littéraires (in French). Vol. 621. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté. doi:10.4000/books.pufc.1726. ISBN 978-2-84867-692-0. OCLC 1286480358. S2CID 228019349.
- Wilson, Eric (2016). The Republic of Cthulhu: Lovecraft, the Weird Tale, and Conspiracy Theory. Santa Barbara, California: Punctum Books. doi:10.21983/P3.0155.1.00. ISBN 978-0-9982375-6-5. OCLC 1135348793. S2CID 165947887.
External links
- The H. P. Lovecraft Archive
- The H. P. Lovecraft Historical Society
- The Lovecraft Arts & Sciences Council, a non-profit educational organization
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Science Fiction
- H. P. Lovecraft at the Encyclopedia of Fantasy
- H. P. Lovecraft at IMDb
- H. P. Lovecraft discography at Discogs
Journals
- Lovecraft Annual
- Lovecraft Studies
- Crypt of Cthulhu
Library collections
- H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Special Collections at the John Hay Library (Brown University)
- H. P. Lovecraft Collection in the Distinctive Collections of Falvey Memorial Library (Villanova University)
Online editions
- Works by Howard Phillips Lovecraft at Project Gutenberg
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft at Faded Page (Canada)
- Works by or about H. P. Lovecraft at Internet Archive
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- Works by H. P. Lovecraft in eBook form at Standard Ebooks
Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт | |
Howard Phillips Lovecraft | |
Дата рождения: |
20 августа 1890 |
---|---|
Место рождения: |
Провиденс |
Дата смерти: |
15 марта 1937 |
Место смерти: |
Провиденс |
Гражданство: |
|
Род деятельности: |
писатель, поэт |
Годы творчества: |
1897—1908, 1917—1936 |
Жанр: |
Мистика, Лавкрафтовские ужасы |
Произведения на сайте Lib.ru | |
Го́вард Фи́ллипс Лавкра́фт (англ. Howard Phillips Lovecraft, 20 августа 1890, Провиденс, Род-Айленд, США — 15 марта 1937, там же) — американский писатель и поэт, писавший в жанрах ужасов, мистики, совмещая их в оригинальном стиле. Родоначальник Мифов Ктулху. При жизни Лавкрафта его произведения не пользовались большой популярностью, однако уже после его смерти они оказали заметное влияние на формирование современной нам массовой культуры. Его творчество настолько уникально, что произведения Лавкрафта выделяются в отдельный поджанр — так называемые Лавкрафтовские ужасы.
Содержание
- 1 Биография
- 2 Творчество
- 2.1 Предшественники
- 2.2 Последователи
- 2.2.1 Август Дерлет
- 2.2.2 Стивен Кинг
- 2.3 «Некрономикон» и другие произведения, упоминаемые Лавкрафтом
- 2.3.1 Реально существующие книги
- 2.4 Г. Ф. Лавкрафт в России
- 2.5 Библиография
- 3 Фильмы
- 4 Примечания
- 5 Литература
- 6 Ссылки
- 7 См. также
Биография
Лавкрафт в раннем детстве, 1892.
Лавкрафт родился в Провиденсе (штат Род-Айленд, США). Он был единственным ребенком в семье коммивояжёра Уилфрида Скотта Лавкрафта и Сары Сьюзан Филлипс Лавкрафт. Известно, что его предки жили в Америке ещё со времён Колонии Массачусетского залива (1630). Когда Говарду было три года, Уилфрида поместили в психиатрическую больницу, где тот находился в течение пяти лет до самой смерти 19 июня 1898[1].
Лавкрафт в возрасте 9-10 лет.
Лавкрафт был воспитан матерью, двумя тётками и дедушкой (Уиппл Ван Бюрен Филлипс), который приютил семью будущего писателя. Говард был вундеркиндом — читал наизусть стихи ещё в возрасте двух лет, а с шести уже писал свои[1]. Благодаря дедушке, у которого была самая большая библиотека в штате[1], он познакомился с классической литературой. Помимо классики он увлёкся готической прозой и арабскими сказками Тысячи и одной ночи.
В возрасте 6—8 лет Лавкрафт написал несколько рассказов, большая часть которых к сегодняшнему дню не сохранилась. В возрасте 14 лет Лавкрафт пишет своё первое серьёзное произведение — «Зверь в пещере».
Ребёнком Лавкрафт часто болел, и в школу пошёл лишь в возрасте восьми лет, но через год его забрали оттуда. Он много читал, изучал между делом химию, написал несколько работ (размножал их на гектографе небольшим тиражом), начиная с 1899 года («Научная газета»). Через четыре года он вернулся в школу.
Уиппл Ван Бурен Филлипс умер в 1904 году, после чего семья сильно обеднела и была вынуждена переехать в меньший дом на той же улице. Говарда опечалил выезд, и он даже подумывал о самоубийстве. Из-за нервного срыва, случившегося с ним в 1908 году, он так и не окончил школу, чего сильно стыдился.
Лавкрафт писал фантастику ещё в детстве («Зверь в пещере» (1905), «Алхимик» (1908)), но позже предпочёл ей поэзию и эссе. Вернулся к этому «несерьёзному» жанру он лишь в 1917 году с рассказами «Дагон», затем «Гробница». «Дагон» стал его первым изданным творением, появившись в 1923 году в журнале «Таинственнные рассказы» (Weird Tales). В то же время Лавкрафт начал свою переписку, ставшую в итоге одной из самых объёмных в XX веке. Среди его корреспондентов были Форрест Аккерман, Роберт Блох и Роберт Говард.
Сара, мать Говарда, после долгой истерии и депрессии попала в ту же лечебницу, где умер её муж, и там же умерла 21 мая 1921 года. Она писала сыну до своих последних дней.
В 1919—1923 гг. Лавкрафт активно писал, создав за эти годы более 40 рассказов, в том числе в соавторстве.
Лавкрафт и его жена Соня Грин, 1924.
Вскоре на собрании журналистов-любителей Говард Лавкрафт встретил Соню Грин, имевшую украинско-еврейские корни, и бывшую на семь лет старше Лавкрафта. Они поженились в 1924 году и переехали в Бруклин, Нью-Йорк. После тихого Провиденса нью-йоркская жизнь не полюбилась Лавкрафту. Во многом автобиографичным был его рассказ «Он». Через несколько лет супруги расстались, хотя и не оформили развода. Лавкрафт вернулся в родной город. Из-за неудавшегося брака некоторые биографы гадали о его асексуальности, но Грин, напротив, называла его «прекрасным любовником»[2].
Вернувшись в Провиденс, Лавкрафт жил в «большом деревянном доме викторианской эпохи» по адресу Барнс-стрит, 10 вплоть до 1933 года (этот адрес является адресом дома Доктора Уиллета в повести «Случай Чарльза Декстера Варда»). В тот период он написал практически все свои короткие рассказы, напечатанные в журналах (в основном в «Таинственных рассказах»), а также многие крупные работы, такие как «Случай Чарльза Декстера Варда» и «Хребты Безумия».
Несмотря на писательские успехи, Лавкрафт всё больше нуждался. Он снова переехал, теперь уже в маленький домик. Сильное впечатление на него произвело самоубийство Роберта Говарда. В 1936 году у писателя обнаружили рак кишечника, следствие недоедания. Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт умер 15 марта 1937 года в Провиденсе (штат Род-Айленд, США).
Творчество
Предшественники
К писателям, чьё творчество оказало влияние на Лавкрафта, в первую очередь нужно отнести Эдгара Аллана По, Эдварда Дансейни, Артура Мейчена, Алджернона Блэквуда, Амброза Бирса, Лафкадио Хирна.
Последователи
Август Дерлет
Пожалуй, главным из последователей Лавкрафта как с точки зрения хронологии, так и с позиций преемственности, является Август Дерлет. Несмотря на то, что впоследствии многие авторы обращались к созданному Лавкрафтом пантеону космических богов, именно Дерлет стал создателем и руководителем издательства «Arkham House», в котором публиковались произведения самого Лавкрафта, Дерлета и всех, кто так или иначе соприкасался в своём творчестве с созданными Лавкрафтом мирами. Дерлет также был довольно успешен как писатель, хотя и не мог сравниться по силе воздействия со своим учителем. Однако он был гением издательского дела — книги издательства «Arkham House» того периода в настоящее время являются библиографическими редкостями. К тому же это был редкий случай, когда издательство создавалось под творчество конкретного человека.
Стивен Кинг
Творчество Лавкрафта, повлиявшее на массовую культуру Запада, оставило неизгладимый след на творчестве бесчисленного числа писателей, работавших и работающих в жанре мистики и ужасов. Одним из творческих наследников Лавкрафта является и знаменитый «Король Ужасов» Стивен Кинг. Наиболее ярким произведением, в котором Стивен Кинг не подражает манере повествования Говарда Лавкрафта, но отдаёт дань таланту последнего, является повесть «Крауч Энд», экранизированная кинокомпанией «TNT» в сборнике киноновелл «Кошмары и фантазии Стивена Кинга». В работах Кинга чётко просматриваются следы влияния творчества Лавкрафта. Так, Роман «Оно» непосредственно отсылает читателя к космическому ужасу, пришедшему из незапамятных времён. Следует однако отметить, что ужас Кинга может быть довольно чётко разграничен на три основные части: космический (Лавкрафт), загробный и научный (Мэри Шелли).
Помимо прочего, действие большинства книг Стивена Кинга происходит в небольших американских городках, что также характерно и для работ Лавкрафта, который считал, что самые страшные вещи творятся в тихих местах.
«Некрономикон» и другие произведения, упоминаемые Лавкрафтом
Обычно Лавкрафт ссылался на древние книги, содержащие секреты, которые не должен знать человек. Большей частью ссылки были вымышленными, но некоторые оккультные работы существовали в действительности. Сочетание выдуманных документов с реальными в одном контексте позволяло первым казаться настоящими. Лавкрафт давал только общие ссылки на такие книги (в основном для нагнетания атмосферы) и редко делал детальное описание. Наиболее известным из этих выдуманных манускриптов является его «Некрономикон», о котором писатель больше всего говорил. Его объяснения по поводу этого текста были так хорошо продуманы, что многие люди и по сей день верят в реальность этой книги, и это позволяет некоторым наживаться на неосведомлённости других.
- The Book of Eibon, Livre d’Eibon, or Liber Ivonis
Придумана Кларком Эштоном Смитом. Лавкрафт лишь несколько раз ссылался на эту книгу в своих рассказах: «Сны в ведьмином доме», «Существо на пороге», и «Тень из безвременья». В последние два года жизни Лавкрафт давал ссылки на два «перевода» этой книги: «Livre d’Eibon» («Дневник Алонзо Тайпера») и «Liber Ivonis» («Обитающий во тьме»). В рассказе «Каменный человек» книга Эйбона служит в качестве основной книги семейной линии колдунов Ван Кауранов, тщательно скрываемой и передающейся по наследству.
- Cultes des Goules by the Comte d’Erlette
Имя автора этой книги образовалось из имени Августа Дерлета, чьи предки перебрались из Франции и чья фамилия исторически правильно писалась как Д’Эрлетт. Как и во множестве подобных случаев, Лавкрафт ссылался на эту книгу всего несколько раз: в рассказах «Тень из безвременья», «Затаившийся у порога» и «Обитающий во тьме».
- De Vermis Mysteriis by Ludvig Prinn
«Мистерии червя» (в некоторых переводах — «Таинственные Черви») и их автор Людвиг Принн были придуманы Робертом Блохом, а латинское название книги «De Vermis Mysteriis» придумал Лавкрафт. Он ссылался на неё в рассказах «Тень из безвременья», «Дневник Алонзо Тайпера», «Единственный наследник» и «Обитающий во тьме».
- The Eltdown Shards
Этот труд есть создание воображения Ричарда Ф. Сирайта, одного из корреспондентов Лавкрафта. Лавркафт мельком упомянул его в своих произведениях: «Тень из безвременья» и «Дневник Алонзо Тайпера».
- The Necronomicon or Al Azif of Abdul Alhazred
Пожалуй, самая известная из мистификаций Лавкрафта. Он давал ссылки на «Некрономикон», также известный как «Аль Азиф», в 18-ти своих рассказах. Настоящим арабским названием этого манускрипта было «Аль Азиф», что означало — «звук, производимый ночными насекомыми», который, как считали арабы, на самом деле издавали демоны. Абдул Альхазред, мифический автор этой книги, жил в Дамаске, где и был написан «Некрономикон». В 738 году н. э. он был прилюдно поглощён невидимым демоном. «Аль Азиф» был переведён на греческий Теодором Филетом из Константинополя, который и дал рукописи название «Некрономикон». Олаус Вормиус перевёл текст на латынь в 1228 году. В 1232 году, вскоре после перевода Вормиусом, папа Григорий IX запретил как греческую, так и латинскую версию книги. Вормиус отмечает, что оригинальный арабский текст к тому времени был уже утерян. Доктор Джон Ди перевёл его на английский, но только несколько фрагментов этого варианта сохранились до нашего времени. В настоящее время латинский перевод XV-го века находится в Британском Музее, редакции XVII-го века находятся в Национальной Библиотеке в Париже, Библиотеке Гарварда, Университете Буэнос-Ариеса, и Мискатоникском Университете Акхема. Естественно, все эти копии тщательно сохраняются.
Первый раз «Некрономикон» упоминается в рассказе «Пёс» (сентябрь 1922), хотя Абдул Альхазред, автор этого труда, упоминается раньше, в «Безымянном Городе» (январь 1921). Именно здесь известнейшее изречение из «Некрономикона» упоминается впервые:
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.
Пожалуй самая длинная выдержка из «Некрономикона» встречается в рассказе «Ужас в Данвиче»:
…не следует верить тому, что человек суть владыка мира единственный и последний. И его жизненная субстанция не единственная существующая на Земле. Древние были, Древние существуют, Древние будут всегда. Но не в известном нам мире, а между мирами. Изначальные, сильные и здоровые. Они невидимы для глаз наших. Один Йог-Сотот знает вход в этот мир. Йог-Сотот — и ключ, и страж этих врат. Прошлое, нынешнее и будущее едины в Йог-Сототе. Он ведает место, где Древние пробили дорогу себе в прошлые времена, ведает, где Они пройдут в будущее. Ведает их следы на Земле, которые они оставляют, невидимые. По одному только запаху люди узнают их присутствие, но образ их узнается в облике тех, кого они произвели среди смертных детей человеческих, от вида человека до формы без субстанции. Невидимыми Они кружат по Земле, ожидая нужных слов Ритуала. Их голос звучит в ветре, о Их присутствии шепчет трава. Они выкорчёвывают леса, уничтожают города, но никто не видит карающую Руку. В ледяных пустынях познал их Кадаф, а разве человек когда-либо познавал Кадаф? Льды на севере и затопленные острова в океанах скрывают камни, на которых начертаны Печати. Йог-Сотот откроет двери, пред которыми смыкаются сферы. Человек царит там, где когда-то властвовали Они. Но как после лета приходит зима, а зима сменяется весной, так и Они ждут своего Часа!!!
- The People of the Monolith by Justin Geoffrey
Как книга, так и её автор были придуманы Робертом Ирвином Говардом, Лавкрафт же лишь один раз ссылается на них в рассказе «Тварь на пороге»:
Время шло, я увлёкся архитектурой и оставил свой замысел проиллюстрировать книгу демонических стихов Эдварда, впрочем, наша дружба оттого не пострадала и не стала слабее. Необычный гений молодого Дерби получил удивительное развитие, и на восемнадцатом году жизни он выпустил сборник макабрической лирики под заглавием «Азатот и прочие ужасы», произведший сенсацию. Он состоял в оживлённой переписке с печально известным поэтом-бодлеристом Джастином Джеффри, тем самым, кто написал «Людей монолита» и в 1926 году умер, крича накрик, в сумасшедшем доме, незадолго до того посетив какую-то зловещую и пользующуюся дурной славой деревушку в Венгрии.
Узнать о Джастине Джеффри можно в рассказе Роберта Говарда «Чёрный Камень» (1931).
- The Pnakotic Manuscripts (or Fragments)
Ещё одна мистификация Лавкрафта. Его «Пнакотические манускрипты» или «Фрагменты» (ссылки в 11-ти произведениях) уступают по частоте обращения лишь «Некрономикону». Никаких деталей о происхождении или содержании этих текстов Лавкрафт не указывает. Скорее всего, эти тексты были написаны в дочеловеческий период.
- Seven Cryptical Books of Hsan
Лавкрафт лишь упоминал о книгах Хсана в «Иных Богах» и «Сомнамбулическом поиске Кадафа Неведомого» оба раза вместе с «Пнакотическими манускриптами».
- Unaussprechlichen Kulten, Black Book, or Nameless Cults by Friedrich von Junzt
Роберт Говард впервые представил «Неименуемые культы» в своём рассказе «Дети ночи» (1931). В следующем году Лавкрафт придумал немецкое название для этих трудов, так как фон Юнтц писал оригинал на немецком. Это название, «Ungenennte Heidenthume», не удовлетворило некоторых из корреспондентов Лавкрафта. Август Дерлет изменил его на «Unaussprechlichen Kulten», которое и утвердилось (хотя в переводе это означало — «Непроизносимые культы», то есть культы, название которых невозможно произнести. «Die Unaussprechlichen Kulten» или «Unaussprechliche Kulten» было бы правильнее).
Хотя Лавкрафт не ссылался на эту книгу чаще чем на другие, он дает её историю издания в рассказе «Вне времён»:
В сущности, любой читатель страшных «Безымянных Культов» фон Юнтца мог бы с первого взгляда установить бесспорную связь между ними и таинственными письменами на плёнке. Но в те времена мало кто знал эту кощунственную работу: первое её издание было уничтожено в Дюссельдорфе в 1839 году, в 1845-м появился перевод Бредуэла, а в 1909-м был опубликован сильно сокращённый вариант.
«Чёрная Книга» фон Юнтца встречается в нескольких рассказах Роберта Говарда: «Дети ночи» (1931), «Чёрный Камень» (1931), «Тварь на крыше» (1932). В последнем рассказе представлена история написания и публикации этой книги.
- R’lyeh Text
Данный текст упоминается у Лавкрафта в рассказе «Затаившийся у порога». Кроме того в том же рассказе даётся вторичная косвенная ссылка на данный текст через другую вымышленную книгу профессора Шрусбери «Исследование мифотворчества у первобытных народов о Последнем дне с Особым упоминанием Текста Р’лайха».
Реально существующие книги
Как указано выше, многие из книг, на которые ссылался Лавкрафт в своих произведениях существуют на самом деле. Вот они:
Ars Magna et Ultima, Raymond Lully («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
The Story of Atlantis and The Lost Lemuria, W. Scott-Elliot («Зов Ктулху»)
The Book of Dzyan («Дневник Алонзо Тайпера» и «Обитающий во тьме»)
The Book of Thoth («Врата серебряного ключа»)
Clavis Alchemiae, Robert Fludd («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Cryptomenysis Patefacta, John Falconer («Ужас в Данвиче»)
The Daemonolatreia, Remigius («Фестиваль» и «Ужас в Данвиче»)
De Furtivis Literarum Notis, Giovanni Battista della Porta («Ужас в Данвиче»)
The Golden Bough, Sir James George Frazer («Зов Ктулху»)
De Lapide Philosophico, Johannes Trithemius («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Description du Royaume de Congo et des Contrees environnantes, Filippo Pigafetta & Duarte Lopez («Картинка в старой книге»)
Key of Wisdom, Artephius («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Kryptographik, Johann Ludwig Kluber («Ужас в Данвиче»)
Liber Investigationis, Geber («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Magnalia Christi Americana, Cotton Mather («Картина в доме» «Неименуемое» «Модель для Пикмана» и «Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Poligraphia, Johannes Trithemius («Ужас в Данвиче»)
Saducismus Triumphatus, Joseph Glanvil («Фестиваль»)
Thesaurus Chemicus, Roger Bacon («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Traité des Chifferes ou Secretes d’Escrire, Blaise de Vigenere («Ужас в Данвиче»)
Turba Philosophorum, Guglielmo Grataroli («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
The Witch-Cult in Western Europe, Dr. Margaret Murray («Кошмар в Ред Хуке» и «Зов Ктулху»)
Wonders of the Invisible World, Cotton Mather («Модель для Пикмана»)
The Zohar («Дело Чарльза Декстера Варда»)
Г. Ф. Лавкрафт в России
Знакомство российского читателя с творчеством Лавкрафта произошло в 1991—1993 годах. Ключевую роль в этом сыграли 2 группы энтузиастов:
1. Петербургский публицист Евгений Головин и московская переводчица Валерия Бернацкая подготовили 256-страничное собрание рассказов писателя для издательства «Terra Incognita» (1991).
2. Коллектив переводчиков из Екатеринбурга, сформировавшийся вокруг литературного агентства Kubin Ltd, подготовил полное 4-томное собрание сочинений Лавкрафта для издательства «Форум» (1991—1993). В группу входили Игорь Богданов, Василий Дорогокупля, Фёдор Еремеев и Олег Мичковский. Всего ими было издано 12 книг Лавкрафта в издательствах Москвы, Киева, Екатеринбурга и Нижнего Новгорода. Эта же команда ответственна за издание 7-томной «Энциклопедии читателя» и создание издательства «Фабрика комиксов».
В настоящее время сборники Лавкрафта регулярно переиздаются в России по крайней мере тремя крупными издательствами — «Азбука», «АСТ», «Эксмо».
В 2006 году интерес к произведениям Лавкрафта в России был сильно подогрет после акции «Вопрос Путину», в ходе которой президенту России задавались вопросы, предварительно отобранные Интернет-голосованием. На голосовании неожиданно, в результате флешмоба, победил шуточный вопрос «Как Вы относитесь к пробуждению Ктулху?»[3]. После этого образ и имя Ктулху стали гораздо чаще использоваться в Рунете.
Библиография
Основная статья: Библиография Г.Ф. Лавкрафта
Наиболее известные и значимые произведения:
- Зов Ктулху (1926)
- Хребты Безумия (1931)
Фильмы
По мотивам произведений Лавкрафта снято несколько десятков фильмов. Наиболее известные из них созданы режиссёрами Стюартом Гордоном, Брайаном Юзной и др.:
- Ужас в Данвиче / The Dunwich Horror (1970)
- Зловещие мертвецы / The Evil Dead (1981)
- Реаниматор / Re-Animator (1985)
- Извне / From Beyond (1986)
- Неименуемое / The Unnamable (1988)
- Невеста реаниматора / Bride of Re-Animator (1990)
- Поместье Ктулху / La Mansion de los Cthulhu (1990)
- Воскресший / The Resurrected (1991)
- Книга мёртвых / Necronomicon (1993)
- Неименуемое 2 / The Unnamable II: The Statement of Randolph Carter (1993)
- В пасти безумия / In the Mouth of Madness (1995)
- Дагон / Dagon (2001)
- Книга теней / Malefique (2002)
- Возвращение реаниматора / Beyond Re-Animator (2003)
- Заброшенный дом / Shunned House (2003)
- Зов Ктулху / The Call of Cthulhu (2005)
- Сны в доме Ведьм / H.P. Lovecraft’s Dreams in the Witch-House (2005)
- Заявление / The Statement (2007)
- Махани, ты не прав / ‘ (2009)
- Ужас в Данвиче / The Dunwich Horror (2009)[4]
- Дом реаниматора / House of Re-Animator (2010)
В настоящее время в России, во Владивостоке снимается фильм «Тень над Аркхэмом» (блог фильма — community.livejournal.com/hpl_movie_blog), также основанный на произведениях Лавкрафта.
Примечания
- ↑ 1 2 3 «По ту сторону сна…» — русский фэн-сайт, биография Лавкрафта
- ↑ H.P. Lovecraft Misconceptions(англ.)
- ↑ Ответы Путина
- ↑ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1226752/
Литература
- Л. Спрэг Де Камп. Лавкрафт: Биография. — СПб.: Амфора, 2008. — С. 656. — ISBN 978-5-367-00815-9
Ссылки
В Викитеке есть оригинал текста по этой теме.
См. Howard Phillips Lovecraft
Предложения со словом «lovecraft»
Collier’s servants tell us that Lovecraft’s servants are ready to load cargo. |
Слуги Кольер рассказали нам, что слуги Лавкрафт готовы начать погрузку. |
I’ll let it leak out that we have a secret eyewitness who’s going to blow the case wide open and connect Lovecraft to the Wayne killings. |
Будет утечка, что некий тайный свидетель широко раздувает дело связью убийства Уэйнов и Лавкрафта . |
He and Lovecraft and Hawthorne and Ambrose Bierce and all the tales of terror and fantasy and horror and, for that matter, tales of the future were burned. |
Его и Лавкрафта , Хоторна и Амброза Бирса, все повести об ужасах и страхах, все фантазии, да что там, все повести о будущем сожгли. |
It’s this cooperative thing where you work together to defeat the monsters of the Lovecraft canon. |
Там нужно играть вместе, чтобы победить монстров Лавкрафта . |
Howard Phillips Lovecraft HERBERT WEST: REANIMATOR |
Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт Герберт Уэст — реаниматор |
Lovecraft tried to Jimmy a damn dimensional door. |
Лавкрафт пытался открыть дверь в другое измерение. |
Lovecraft has dealings with all of them. |
Лавкрафт заключал сделки со всеми. |
So, I hear you have a large collection of Lovecraft’s private letters. |
Я слыхал, у вас большая коллекция частных писем Лавкрафта . |
The fanciful connection between Dee and The Necronomicon was suggested by Lovecraft’s friend Frank Belknap Long. |
Фантастическую связь между Ди и Некрономиконом предложил друг Лавкрафта Фрэнк Белкнап Лонг. |
This is a complete list of works by H. P. Lovecraft . |
Это полный список произведений Г. П. Лавкрафта . |
While put forward as posthumous collaborations while Derleth was alive, the status of these works as collaborations with Lovecraft was swiftly disputed after his death. |
Несмотря на то, что Дерлет был выдвинут в качестве посмертного сотрудничества, статус этих работ Как сотрудничества с Лавкрафтом был быстро оспорен после его смерти. |
The following are modern reprintings and collections of Lovecraft’s work. |
Ниже приведены современные переиздания и сборники произведений Лавкрафта . |
His first book was a biographical essay on the horror writer H. P. Lovecraft . |
Его первой книгой было биографическое эссе о писателе ужасов Г. П. Лавкрафте . |
Lovecraft scholar S. T. Joshi has criticised Houellebecq’s stance on Lovecraft . |
Лавкрафт ученого С. Т. Джоши подверг критике позицию Уэльбека на Лавкрафта . |
An essay by Todd Spaulding makes the case for why Houellebecq portrayed Lovecraft as an ‘obsolete reactionary’ whose work was based largely on ‘racial hatred. |
Эссе Тодда Сполдинга объясняет, почему Уэльбек изображал Лавкрафта как устаревшего реакционера, чья работа была основана в основном на расовой ненависти. |
Lovecraft accepted the job because of the money he was offered in advance by Henneberg. |
Лавкрафт согласился на эту работу из — за денег, которые ему заранее предложил Хеннеберг. |
Despite Lovecraft’s use of artistic license, Houdini enjoyed the tale and the two men collaborated on several smaller projects prior to the latter’s death in 1926. |
Несмотря на то, что Лавкрафт использовал художественную лицензию, Гудини наслаждался рассказом, и двое мужчин сотрудничали в нескольких небольших проектах до смерти последнего в 1926 году. |
Lovecraft would later receive credit in the editor’s note of the 1939 reprint. |
Лавкрафт позже получит похвалу в примечании редактора к репринту 1939 года. |
To thank the author for his work, Houdini gave Lovecraft a signed copy of his 1924 book A Magician Among the Spirits. |
Чтобы отблагодарить автора за его работу, Гудини подарил Лавкрафту подписанный экземпляр своей книги 1924 года Волшебник среди духов. |
Interest in Lovecraft reached new heights in 1975, with two full-length biographies published in the same year as The Illuminatus! |
Интерес к Лавкрафту достиг новых высот в 1975 году, когда две полнометражные биографии были опубликованы в том же году, что и Иллюминатус! |
The works of Tolkien have been a major influence on role-playing games along with others such as Robert E. Howard, Fritz Leiber, H. P. Lovecraft , and Michael Moorcock. |
Произведения Толкина оказали большое влияние на ролевые игры наряду с другими, такими как Роберт Э. Говард, Фриц Лейбер, Х. П. Лавкрафт и Майкл Муркок. |
Lovecraft depicts Cthulhu as a gigantic entity worshipped by cultists. |
Лавкрафт изображает Ктулху как гигантское существо, которому поклоняются культисты. |
Its name was given to the Lovecraft-inspired universe where it and its fellow entities existed, the Cthulhu Mythos. |
Его имя было дано Вселенной, вдохновленной Лавкрафтом , где он и его собратья существовали, мифы Ктулху. |
According to Lovecraft , this is merely the closest that the human vocal apparatus can come to reproducing the syllables of an alien language. |
По словам Лавкрафта , это просто самое близкое, что человеческий голосовой аппарат может сделать для воспроизведения слогов чужого языка. |
Long after Lovecraft’s death, the spelling pronunciation /kəˈθuːluː/ became common. |
Долгое время после смерти Лавкрафта орфографическое произношение /kəˈθululuː/ стало обычным. |
Derleth’s interpretations have been criticized by Lovecraft enthusiast Michel Houellebecq, among others. |
Интерпретации Дерлета были подвергнуты критике, в частности, энтузиастом Лавкрафта Мишелем Уэльбеком. |
The band’s name is inspired by the story The Whisperer in Darkness by H. P. Lovecraft . |
Название группы навеяно историей Шепчущий во тьме Г. П. Лавкрафта . |
He is working on a feature-length adaptation of Hans Rodionoff, Enrique Breccia and Keith Giffen’s graphic-novel biography of H.P. Lovecraft . |
Он работает над полнометражной адаптацией Ганса Родионова, Энрике брекчии и графической новеллы кита Гиффена биография Г. П. Лавкрафта . |
The great-grandson of British-born Aaron Lovecraft of Rochester, New York, Taylor was a first cousin of author H. P. Lovecraft . |
Правнук уроженца Великобритании Аарона Лавкрафта из Рочестера, штат Нью — Йорк, Тейлор был двоюродным братом писателя Х. П. Лавкрафта . |
Highly influenced by H.P Lovecraft , Ito’s manga depict obscene body horror through both aesthetic and narrative in order to invoke feelings of abject terror. |
Под сильным влиянием Х. П. Лавкрафта манга Ито изображает непристойный телесный ужас как через эстетику, так и через повествование, чтобы вызвать чувство унизительного ужаса. |
The film was adapted from H.P.Lovecraft’s The Vault and it stylisically spans both the silent film comedy and horror genres. |
Фильм был экранизирован по произведению Г. П. Лавкрафта хранилище и стилистически охватывает как жанры немой кинокомедии, так и жанры ужасов. |
Tom Cruise was attached to star in the Lovecraft adaptation. |
Том Круз был прикреплен к звезде в адаптации Лавкрафта . |
The Deep Ones are creatures in the Cthulhu Mythos of H. P. Lovecraft . |
Глубинные существа — это существа из Мифов Ктулху Г. П. Лавкрафта . |
After their debut in Lovecraft’s tale, the sea-dwelling creatures resurfaced in the works of other authors, especially August Derleth. |
После их дебюта в рассказе Лавкрафта морские обитатели вновь появились в работах других авторов, особенно Августа Дерлета. |
Lovecraft expanded the story into a tale about a mound that conceals a gateway to a subterranean civilization, the realm of K’n-yan. |
Лавкрафт расширил эту историю до рассказа о кургане, который скрывает врата в подземную цивилизацию, царство К’н — Ян. |
Lovecraft did not like this premise of what seemed to be a conventional ghost story. |
Лавкрафту не нравилась эта предпосылка того, что казалось обычной историей о привидениях. |
It does not look like how Lovecraft described it, and is a natural formation. |
Она не похожа на то, как ее описал Лавкрафт , и является естественным образованием. |
This is most likely the mound that inspired Zealia Bishop to present her story idea to Lovecraft . |
Это, скорее всего, тот самый курган, который вдохновил Зелию Бишоп представить свою идею рассказа Лавкрафту . |
The story was not published during Lovecraft’s lifetime. |
Эта история не была опубликована при жизни Лавкрафта . |
Lovecraft named several of these deities, including Cthulhu, Ghatanothoa, and Yig. |
Лавкрафт назвал несколько таких божеств, в том числе Ктулху, Гатанотоа и Йиг. |
Some believe the reader is Azathoth, reading Lovecraft’s books and ‘dreaming’ up the universe. |
Некоторые считают, что читатель — это Азатот, читающий книги Лавкрафта и мечтающий о Вселенной. |
In post-Lovecraft stories, the Elder Gods oppose the likes of Cthulhu and his ilk. |
В рассказах пост — Лавкрафта старшие Боги противостоят таким, как Ктулху и ему подобные. |
First appeared in Lovecraft’s short story Hypnos. |
Впервые появился в рассказе Лавкрафта Гипнос. |
Many writers, both during Lovecraft’s lifetime and after, have added stories and elements to the Mythos. |
Многие писатели, как при жизни Лавкрафта , так и после него, добавляли истории и элементы к мифам. |
In Lovecraft’s sequel, Blake dies while investigating the Starry Wisdom cult of Enoch Bowen. |
В продолжении Лавкрафта Блейк умирает, исследуя культ звездной мудрости Еноха Боуэна. |
Lovecraft modeled Blake on Bloch, but also gave him characteristics that evoke Clark Ashton Smith and Lovecraft himself. |
Лавкрафт смоделировал Блейка по образцу Блоха, но также дал ему характеристики, которые напоминают Кларка Эштона Смита и самого Лавкрафта . |
Author Lin Carter wrote stories which are pastiches of either Lovecraft or Clark Ashton Smith utilising all five titles. |
Автор Лин Картер написал рассказы, которые являются пастишами либо Лавкрафта , либо Кларка Эштона Смита, используя все пять названий. |
This horror mini-series is set in the H. P. Lovecraft universe, and like The Courtyard, is illustrated by Jacen Burrows. |
Этот мини — сериал ужасов разворачивается во Вселенной Х. П. Лавкрафта и, как и внутренний двор, иллюстрируется Джейсеном Берроузом. |
For his horror writing, Michael Dirda ranked him alongside Edgar Allan Poe and H. P. Lovecraft . |
Запуск банка может произойти даже тогда, когда он был начат с ложной истории. |
Chambers in turn went on to influence H. P. Lovecraft and much of modern horror fiction. |
Чемберс, в свою очередь, продолжал оказывать влияние на Г. П. Лавкрафта и большую часть современной фантастики ужасов. |
Especially Star Trek, Harry Potter, Sherlock Holmes, and the stories of Lovecraft . |
Особенно Звездный путь, Гарри Поттер, Шерлок Холмс и рассказы Лавкрафта . |
The influence of the Nights on modern horror fiction is certainly discernible in the work of H. P. Lovecraft . |
Влияние ночи на современную фантастику ужасов, безусловно, заметно в творчестве Г. П. Лавкрафта . |
The H.P. Lovecraft inspired movie Dagon, released in 2001, additionally features grotesque hybrid beings. |
В фильме Х. П. Лавкрафта Дагон, вышедшем в 2001 году, дополнительно представлены гротескные гибридные существа. |
The British fantasy and comic book writer Neil Gaiman adapted this story to the universe of horror writer H. P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos. |
Британский писатель — фантаст и автор комиксов Нил Гейман адаптировал эту историю к Вселенной мифов о Ктулху писателя ужасов Х. П. Лавкрафта . |
This article quoted extensively from his letters to Lovecraft , which have not otherwise been widely available. |
В этой статье широко цитируются его письма к Лавкрафту , которые иначе не были бы широко доступны. |
Lovecraft Remembered is a collection of memoirs about American writer H. P. Lovecraft , edited by Peter Cannon. |
Лавкрафт вспомнил — это сборник воспоминаний об американском писателе Х. П. Лавкрафте , изданный Питером Кэнноном. |
Nearly all the memoirs from previous Arkham publications of Lovecraft miscellany are included. |
Почти все мемуары из предыдущих публикаций Arkham miscellany Лавкрафта включены в Книгу. |
Scholars, however, place Lovecraft’s visit too late to have inspired the 1929 story. |
Ученые, однако, считают, что визит Лавкрафта был слишком поздним, чтобы вдохновить рассказ 1929 года. |
The story was inspired by Lovecraft’s first trip to Marblehead, Massachusetts, in December 1922. |
Эта история была вдохновлена первой поездкой Лавкрафта в Марблхед, штат Массачусетс, в декабре 1922 года. |
Lovecraft himself did not think much of the story. |
Сам Лавкрафт был не слишком высокого мнения об этой истории. |
Автор американских ужасов и создатель мифов о Ктулху
Х. П. Лавкрафт | |
---|---|
Родился | Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт. (1890-08-20) 20 августа 1890 года. Провиденс, Род-Айленд, США |
Умер | 15 марта 1937 (1937-03-15) (46 лет). Провиденс, Род-Айленд, США |
Место отдыха | Кладбище Суон-Пойнт, Провиденс, Род-Айленд, США. 41 ° 51’14 ″ с.ш., 71 ° 22’52 ″ з.д. / 41,854021 ° с.ш., 71,381068 ° Вт / 41,854021; -71.381068 |
Имя пера |
|
Род занятий | Рассказчик, редактор, романист, поэт |
Национальность | Американец |
Период | 1917–1937 |
Жанр | Странная фантастика, фантастика ужасов, научная фантастика, готическая фантастика, фантастика, ужас Лавкрафта |
литературное движение | космизм |
Известные произведения |
|
Супруг | Соня Грин (m.1924) |
|
|
Подпись |
Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт (US : ; 20 августа 1890 — 15 марта 1937) был американским писателем странностей и ужасов, который известен своим созданием Мифами Ктулху.
Лавкрафт родился в Провиденсе Род-Айленд, большую часть своей жизни провел в Новой Англии. Он родился в достатке, но богатство его семьи рассеялось вскоре после смерти его деда. В 1913 году он написал критическое письмо в pulp magazine, которое закончилось к достижению его вовлечения в криминальное чтиво. В течение межвоенного периода он писал и публиковал рассказы, в которых основное внимание уделяется его интерпретации места человечества во Вселенной. По его мнению, человечество было несущественной частью безразличного космоса, который мог быть сметен в любой момент. Эти рассказы также включаютли фантастических элементов, которые представляют собой воспринимаемую хруп антропоцентризма..
Лавкрафт был в центре более широкого коллектива авторов, известного как «Круг Лавкрафта». Эта группа писала рассказы, в которых часто делились подробностями между собой. Он также был плодовитым писателем. Он поддерживал переписку с разными авторами и литературными протеже. По некоторым оценкам, за свою жизнь он написал около 100 000 писем. В этих письмах он обсуждал свое мировоззрение и повседневную жизнь, а также обучал молодых авторов, таких как Август Дерлет, Дональд Вандрей и Роберт Блох.
на протяжении всей своей взрослой жизни. жизни, Лавкрафт никогда не мог содержать себя за счет заработков в качестве автора и редактора. Он был практически неизвестен в журналах до того, как умер в бедности в возрасте 46 лет, но теперь он считается одним из самых значительных авторов фантастики о сверхъестественном ужасе 20-го века. Среди его самых известных сказок: «Зов Ктулху », «Крысы в стенах », В горах безумия, Тень. над Иннсмутом и Тень вне времени. Его произведения лежат в основе мифов Ктулху, которые послужили источником создания большого количества стилей, игр, музыки и других средств массовой информации, основанных на персонажах, сеттинге и темах Лавкрафта, составляющих более широкий поджанр, известный как лавкрафтовский. ужас.
Содержание
- 1 Биография
- 1.1 Ранние годы и семейные трагедии
- 1.2 Раннее признание
- 1.3 Омоложение и трагедия
- 1.4 Брак и Нью-Йорк
- 1.5 Возвращение в Провиденс
- 1.6 Последние годы и смерть
- 2 Влияния
- 3 Темы
- 3.1 Запрещенное знание
- 3.2 Нечеловеческое влияние на человечество
- 3.3 Судьба
- 3.4 Цивилизация под угрозой
- 3.5 Раса
- 3.6 Риски научной эпохи
- 3.7 Религия и суеверия
- 3.8 Страна Лавкрафта
- 4 Критический прием
- 4.1 Внутри жанра
- 4.2 Литературный
- 4.3 Философский
- 4.4 2010-е и 2020-е прием
- 5 Наследие
- 5.1 Музыка
- 5.2 Игры
- 5.3 Религия и оккультизм
- 5.4 Лавкрафт в художественной литературе
- 6 Издания и сборники произведений
- 6.1 Со ссылкой
- 6.2 Авторские права и другие правовые вопросы
- 7 Библиография
- 8 См. также
- 9 Примечания
- 10 Ссылки
- 11 Источники
- 12 литература
- 13 Ссылки
- 13.1 Библиотечные коллекции
- 13.2 Онлайн-издания
Биография
Ранние годы и семейные трагедии
Сара, Ховард и Уинфилд Лавкрафт в 1892 году.
Лавкрафт родился в августе в доме своей семьи. 20, 1890, в Провиденс, Род-Айленд. Он единственным ребенком Уинфилда Скотта Лавкрафта и Сары Сьюзен [урожденной Филлипс] Лавкрафт. Семья Сьюзи была обеспечена на момент их свадьбы, ее отец, Уиппл Бюрен Филлипс, был вовлечен в деловые предприятия.
В апреле 1893 года, после психотического эпизода в чикагском отеле, Уинфилд был предан делу. Больница дворецкого в Провиденсе. Неясно, сообщивший о предыдущем поведении Уинфилда в больнице, медицинские записи, что он «делал и говорил временными странные вещи» за год до своего заключения. Уинфилд провел пять лет в Батлере, прежде чем умер в 1898 году. В его свидетельстве о смерти в качестве причины смерти указывался общий парез, термин, синоним позднего сифилиса. На всей своей жизни Лавкрафт утверждал, что его отец впал в паралитическое состояние из-за бессонницы и переутомления, и оставался таким до самой смерти. Неизвестно, держали ли Лавкрафта в неведении относительно болезни своего отца или его более поздние вводмеренно вводили в заблуждение.
После госпитализации отца Лавкрафт проживал в семейном доме со своей матерью, тетками по материнской линии Лилиан и Энни., а также его бабушка и дедушка по материнской линии Уиппл и Роби. По рассказам друзей семьи, Сьюзи безумно любила молодого Лавкрафта, баловала его и никогда не выпускала из поля зрения. Позже Лавкрафт вспоминал, что после болезни отца его мать постоянно мучилась горем. В это время Уиппл стал отцом Лавкрафта, причем Лавкрафт отметил, что его дед стал «всей моей вселенной». Уиппл, который часто путешествовал по делам, поддерживал переписку с молодым Лавкрафтом, который к трем годам уже умел читать и писать. Он воспользуется молодым Лавкрафта ценить литературу, особенно классическую литературу и английскую поэзию. В преклонном возрасте он помог воспитать молодого Г. П. Лавкрафта и обучил его не только классике, но и оригинальным странным рассказам о «крылатых ужасах» и «глубоких, тихих, стонущих звуках», которые он создал для развлечения его внука. Точные источники странных сказок Филлипса не установлены. Сам Лавкрафт предположил, что они произошли от классических готических романистов, таких как Энн Рэдклифф, Мэтью Льюис и Чарльз Мэтьюрин. Именно в этот период Лавкрафт познакомился с некоторыми из своих ранних литературных влияний, такими как Иней древнего мореплавателя, иллюстрированный Гюставом Доре, Тысяча и одна ночь, подарок матери, Томаса Булфинча Age of Fable и Овидия Метаморфозы.
Хотя никаких никаких указаний что Лавкрафт был особенно близок со своей бабушкой Роби, ее смерть в 1896 году оказала огромное влияние. По его собственным словам, это повергло его семью в «мрак, от которого она так и не оправилась полностью». То, что его мать и тети носили черные траурные платья, «напугали» его, и именно в это время Лавкрафту, примерно пяти с половиной лет, начали сн кошмары, которые повлияли на его более поздние произведения. В частности, ему постоянно сниться кошмары по названию «ночными призраками»; их появление он объяснял область иллюстраций, которые «кружили меня в пространстве с головокружительной скоростью, одновременно и толкая меня своими отвратительными трезубцами». Тридцать лет спустя в сочинениях Лавкрафта появятся ночные призраки.
Самые ранние известные литературные произведения Лавкрафта начались в возрасте семи лет со стихов, модернизирующих Одиссею и другие мифологические истории. Лавкрафт сказал, что в детстве он влюблен в римский пантеон богов, их ненастоящие выражения от своего христианского воспитания. Он вспомнил, как в пятилетнем возрасте ему сказали, что Санта-Клауса не существует, и он парировал, спросив, почему «Бог — не миф». В возрасте восьми лет он увлекся науками, особенно астрономией и химией. Он также изучил книги по анатомии, доступные ему в семейной библиотеке, изучил особенности репродукции человека, который ему еще не объяснили, и обнаружил, что это практически убило мой интерес к этому предмету ». В 1902 году, согласно собственной переписке Лавкрафта, астрономия оказала оказывающее влияние на его мировоззрение. Он начал выпускать журнал Rhode Island Journal of Astronomy, 69 выпусков которого сохранились, используя метод печати гектографом. Лавкрафт неоднократно ходил в начальную школу и из нее, часто с домашними репетиторами, восполняющими потерянные школьные годы, пропуская время из-за проблем со здоровьем, которые не совсем понятны. В письменных воспоминаниях его сверстников он описывался как замкнутый, но при этом открыто приветствующий всех, кто разделяет его нынешнее увлечение астрономией, и приглашает всех посмотреть в телескоп, который он ценил.
К 1900 году различные коммерческие интересы Уиппла стали ослабевать. спад и медленное сокращение благосостояния его. Он был вынужден оставить свою семью, оставив Лавкрафта, Уиппла и Сьюзи, единственной незамужней сестры, одну в семейном доме. Весной 1904 года крупнейшее предприятие Уиппла потерпело катастрофический провал. Через несколько месяцев он умер из-за инсульта в возрасте 70 лет. После смерти Уиппла Сюзи не смогла поддержать обширного семейного дома на том, что осталось от поместья Филлипсов. Позже в том же году она была вынуждена переехать вместе с сыном в небольшой дуплекс . Лавкрафт назвал это время одним из самых мрачных в своей жизни, отметив в письме 1934 года, что он больше не видит смысла в жизни. Осенью того же года он пошел в среднюю школу. Как и в предыдущие школьные годы, Лавкрафта временами отстраняли от занятий на длительные периоды из-за того, что он называл «близкими срывами». Однако он сказал, что, несмотря на некоторые конфликты с учителями, ему нравилась средняя школа, он сблизился с небольшим кругом друзей и хорошо учился, особенно по химии и физике. Помимо паузы в 1904 году, он также возобновил публикацию журнала астрономии Род-Айленда, а также начал выпуск журнала Scientific Gazette, который в основном касался химии. Именно в этот период Лавкрафт создал первый из тех художественных произведений, он стал известен, а именно «Зверь в пещере » и «Алхимик «.
. 1908 год, до окончания средней школы, когда Лавкрафт пережил еще один кризис своего рода, хотя этот случай был, по-предположительно, более серьезным, чем любой предыдущий. Точные обстоятельства и причины остаются неизвестными. Единственными прямыми характеристиками являются более поздняя переписка Лавкрафта, в которой онал это по-разному как «нервный срыв» и «своего рода срыв», в одном письме он обвиняет его в стрессе в средней школе, несмотря на то, что ему это нравится. В другом письме, касающемся событий 1908 года, он отмечает: «Я был и остаюсь жертвой. к сильным головным болям, бессоннице и общей нервной слабости, которая мешает мне заниматься постоянно чем-либо ». Хотя Лавкрафт утверждал, что должен учиться в Университете Брауна после окончания средней школы, он так и не окончил университет и больше никогда не посещал школу. от физического недуга, психического недуга или их комбинации никогда не определялись. В одном из рассказов одноклассника Лавкрафта описывались «ужасные тики» и что временами «он сидел на своем месте, внезапно вскакивал и прыгал». Гарри Бробст, профессор психологии, изучил этот отчет и заявил, что малая хорея была наиболее вероятной причиной детских симптомов Лавкрафта, при этом отметив, что случаи малой хореи после подросткового возраста очень редки. Сам Лавкрафт в письмах признавал, что в детстве от приступов хореи. Далее Бробст рискнул, что срыв Лавкрафта 1908 года был приписан «истероидному припадку» — термину, который сегодня обычно обозначает атипичную депрессию. В другом письме, касающемся событий 1908 года, Лавкрафт заявил, что он «с трудом выносил, чтобы видеть или говорить с кем-либо, и любил закрывать, убирая темные тени и используя искусственный свет».
Раннее признание
Немногое о деятельности Лавкрафта и Сьюзи с конца 1908 по 1913 год записано. Лавкрафт упоминает о неуклонном продолжении их финансового упадка, о чем свидетельствует неудачное предприятие его дяди, которое стоило Сьюзи части их истощающегося состояния. Подруга Сьюзи, Клара Хесс, вспомнила визит, во время которого Сьюзи постоянно говорила о том, что Лавкрафт «настолько отвратителен, что он прятался от всех и не любил гулять по улицам, где люди могли смотреть на него». Несмотря на протест Гесса, что это не так, Сьюзи сохранила эту позицию. Со своей стороны, Лавкрафт сказал, что считает свою мать «настоящим чудом уважения». Позже соседка указала, что то, что окружающие часто думали, была громкими ночными ссорами между матерью и сыном, она узнала как декламацию Шекспира, деятельность, которая, казалось, восхищала мать и сына.
В этот период Лавкрафт возродил свои ранние научные периодические издания. Он попытался посвятить себя изучению органической химии, Сьюзи купила дорогостоящий комплекс химии стекла, который он хотел. Лавкрафт обнаружил, что его занятиям мешает математика, которую он считал скучной и вызывающей головную боль, которая вырубит его на целый день. Первое стихотворение Лавкрафта, которое не было опубликовано самостоятельно, появилось в местной газете в 1912 году. Названное в 2000 году нашей эры, стихотворение Провидение предвидело будущее, в котором люди английского происхождения будут вытеснены иммигрантами: ирландцами, итальянцами, португальцами и евреями. В этот период он также написал расистские стихи, такие как «Падшая Новая Англия» и «О создании негров»; нет никаких никаких указаний на то, что они когда-либо были опубликованы при его жизни.
В 1911 году письма Лавкрафта к редакторам начали появляться в журналах, посвященных криминальной фантастике, в первую очередь в Аргози. Письмо 1913 года с критикой Фреда Джексона, известного писателя Аргози, положило Лавкрафта путь, который сильно повлиял на его жизнь. Лавкрафт описал рассказы Джексона как «банальные, женственные и местами грубые». Продолжая, Лавкрафт сказал, что персонажи Джексона проявляют «тонкие страсти и эмоции, присущие неграм и человекообразным обезьянам». Это вызвало почти годичную вражду в разделе писем «Аргози», его случайными сторонниками и большинством читателей, критикующих его взгляд на Джексона. Самым большим критиком Лавкрафта был Джон Рассел, который часто отвечал на вопросы, которые уважал себя обязанным ответить, что уважал писательские способности Рассела. Самым непосредственным результатом вражды было признание, полученное от Эдварда Ф. Дааса, тогдашнего главного редактора Объединенная ассоциация любительской прессы (также известной как UAPA). Даас пригласил Рассела и Лавкрафта в организацию, и приняли, Лавкрафт в апреле 1914 года.
Омоложение и трагедия
С появлением Юнайтед я получил обновленное желание жить; обновленное ощущение существования, отличного от лишнего веса; и нашел сферу, в которой я мог чувствовать, что мои усилия не были полностью напрасными. Впервые я мог вообразить, что мои неуклюжие поиски искусства были чем-то большим, чем слабые крики, затерянные в безжалостной пустоте.
— Лавкрафт в 1921 году.
Лавкрафтился в мир любительской журналистики на большую часть своей жизни. следующее десятилетие. В этот период он был сторонником дилетантства против коммерциализма. Однако определение коммерциализма Лавкрафтом относилось к написанию, как он считал, низкопробных платных публикаций. Он противопоставил это своему взгляду на «профессиональные публикации», который он назвал написанием статей для журналов и издательств, которые он считал респектабельными. Он думал о любительской журналистике как о тренировке и практике для профессиональной карьеры. Лавкрафт был назначен председателем Департамента общественной критики UAPA в конце 1914 года. Он использовал это положение, чтобы отстаивать свое, что многие считали странным, настаивание на превосходстве языка, большинство писателей уже считали архаичным. Он открыто критиковал других участников UAPA за их «американизм» и «сленг», выступая символом англофильных взглядов, которые он принимает на протяжении всей своей жизни. Часто эта критика выражается в ксенофобских и расистских аргументах, оплакивающих «ублюдки» «национального языка» иммигрантами. В середине 1915 года Лавкрафт был избранным на должность первого вице-президента UAPA. Два года спустя он был избран президентом и назначил других членов совета директоров, которые в основном разделяли его взгляды на превосходство классического английского над современным американским английским. Еще одним знаменательным событием этого времени стало начало Первой мировой войны. Лавкрафт опубликовал многочисленные критические замечания по поводу нежелания правительства США и американской общественности присоединиться к войне для защиты Англии, которую он считал родиной Америки.
В 1916 году Лавкрафт опубликовал свой ранний рассказ «Алхимик »в главном журнале УАПА, что отличается от его обычных стихов. В немалой степени благодаря поддержке У. Пол Кук, еще один член UAPA и будущий друг на всю жизнь, Лавкрафт начал писать и публиковать больше художественной литературы. Вскоре последовали «Могила » и «Дагон ». «Гробница», по собственному признанию Лавкрафта, близко следует стилю и построению произведений одного из его самых влиятельных людей Эдгара Аллана По. «Дагон», тем не менее, считается первой работой Лавкрафта, в которой были охвачены концепции и темы, которыми впоследствии будут известны его произведения. В 1918 году срок Лавкрафта на посту президента UAPA истек, и он занял свой прежний пост председателя Департамента общественной критики. В 1919 году Лавкрафт опубликовал еще один рассказ — «За стеной сна». В 1917 году, как Лавкрафт рассказывал Кляйнеру, Лавкрафт предпринял неудачную попытку уйти в армию. Несмотря на то, что он сдал медицинский осмотр, он сказал Кляйнеру, что его мать «угрожала пойти на все, законное или иное, если я не раскрою все недуги, которые не годятся для меня в армии».
Зимой 1918–1919 гг. Сьюзи, проявляя симптомы своего рода «нервного срыва», переехала жить к своей старшей сестре Лилиан. Неясно, чем могла страдать Сьюзи. Соседка и подруга Клара Хесс, опрошенная в 1948 году, вспомнила случаи, когда Сьюзи описывала «странных и фантастических существ, которые выбегали из-за зданий и из углов в темноте». В том же рассказе Гесс описывает время, когда они пересеклись в центре Провиденса, и Сьюзи «была взволнована и, очевидно, не знала, где она была». Какими бы ни были причины, в марте 1919 года они привели к тому, что Сюзи была помещена в больницу Батлера, как и ее муж до нее. Непосредственная реакция Лавкрафта на приверженность Сюзи была интуитивной, когда он написал Кляйнеру, что «существование кажется малоценным» и что он хотел, чтобы «оно могло прекратиться». Лавкрафт периодически навещал Сюзи и гулял с ней по обширной территории, но, разговаривая с врачами Сьюзи, через месяц после того, как она поступила в Батлер, Лавкрафт пришел к выводу, что ее никогда не выпустят.
В конце 1919 года Лавкрафт стал болееобщительный. После периода изоляции он начал присоединяться к друзьям в поездках на собрания писателей; первая — это доклад в Бостоне, представленный лордом Дансани, которого Лавкрафт недавно обнаружил и боготворил. В начале 1920 года на съезде писателей-любителей он встретил Фрэнка Белкнапа Лонга, который в итоге стал самым близким доверенным лицом Лавкрафта на всю оставшуюся жизнь. Этот период также оказался наиболее плодотворным в истории рассказов Лавкрафта. Влияние Дансени отчетливо проявляется в его произведениях 1919 года, позже придуманных Лавкрафтом «Цикл сновидений», с такими историями, как «Белый корабль», «Рок, постигший Сарнатх» и «Заявление Рэндольфа Картера». В начале 1920 года последовали «Кошки Ултара » и «Селефаис ». Позднее, в 1920 году, Лавкрафт начал публиковать самые ранние рассказы, которые вписывались в Мифы Ктулху. Мифы Ктулху, термин, вероятно, придуманный Августом Дерлетом, охват истории Лавкрафта, которые имеют общие черты в раскрытии космической незначительности, изначально реалистичных условиях и повторяющихся сущностях и текстах. Поэма «Ньярлатхотеп» и рассказ «Ползучий хаос» в сотрудничестве с Уинифред Вирджиния Джексон были написаны в конце 1920 года. Следом в начале 1921 года появился «Безымянный город», первый рассказ, который окончательно попадает в мифы Ктулху. В нем найден один из самых устойчивых отрывков Лавкрафта, двустишие, произнесенное его творение Абдул Альхазред : «То, что не мертво, может вечно лгать; И со странными эонами даже смерть может умереть ».
24 мая 1921 года Сьюзи умерла в больнице Батлера из-за осложнений после операции на желчном пузыре пятью днями ранее. Первоначальной реакцией Лавкрафта, выраженной в письме через девять дней после смерти, было «сильное нервное потрясение», которое искалечило его физически и эмоционально, снова отмечая, что он не нашел причин продолжать жить. Несмотря на реакцию Лавкрафта, он продолжал посещать съезды журналистов-любителей. Именно на одной из таких конференций в июле Лавкрафт познакомился с Соней Грин.
Брак и Нью-Йорк
Х. П. Лавкрафт и Соня Грин 5 июля 1921 года.
Тети Лавкрафта не одобряли эти отношения с Соней. Лавкрафт и Грин поженились 3 марта 1924 года и переехали в ее бруклинскую квартиру на 793 Flatbush Avenue; она думала, что ему нужно оставить Провидение, чтобы процветать, и была готова поддержать его финансово. Грин, которая раньше была замужем, позже сказала, что Лавкрафт удовлетворительно проявил себя в качестве любовника, хотя ей приходилось проявлять инициативу во всех аспектах отношений. Она приписывала пассивный характер Лавкрафта отупляющему воспитанию его матери. Вес Лавкрафта увеличился до 200 фунтов (91 кг) из-за домашней кухни его жены.
Он был назван Нью-Йорком, и в том, что неофициально называли Клубом Калем, он приобрел группу вдохновляющих интеллектуалов и друзей-литераторов. который уговаривал его отправлять истории в Weird Tales ; редактор Эдвин Бэрд произвело множество потусторонних историй Лавкрафта из «Цикла снов» для больной публикации, хотя они подверглись резкой критике со стороны части читателей. Основанный неофициально для нескольких лет до прибытия Лавкрафта в Нью-Йорк, клуба Калема были писатель-приключенческий писатель Генри Эверетттнил, юрист и писатель-анархист Джеймс Фердинанд Мортон-младший и поэт Рейнхардт Кляйнер.
В первый день нового года 1925 года Соня переехала в Кливленд в поисках работы, а Лавкрафт уехал из Флэтбуша в небольшую квартиру на первом этаже на Клинтон-стрит, 169, на окраине Красного. Крюк «- место, которое сильно его смутило. Позже в том же году к четырем постоянным посетителям Клуба Калема присоединились Лавкрафт вместе со протеже Фрэнком Белнапом Лонгом, продавцом книг Джорджем Уиллардом Кирком и Сэмюэлем Лавманом. Лавман был евреем, но он и Лавкрафт стали близкими друзьями, несмотря на нативистское отношение к последнему.
Вскоре после Грин потеряла свой бизнес, а ее активы исчезли из-за свадьбы Банкротства банка; она тоже заболела, чтобы поддержать свою жену работу, но его отсутствие предыдущего опыта работы означало, что ему не хватало проверенных рыночных навыков. Weird Tales попытался поставить убыточный журнал на коммерческую основу и применил Лавкрафту должность редактора, но тот отказался, сославшись на его нежелание переехать в Чикаго; «Подумайте о трагед ии такого шага для престарелого антиквара », — заявил 34-летний писатель. Бэрда заменили на Фарнсворта Райта, чьи произведения Лавкрафт критиковал. Представления Лавкрафта часто отвергались Райт. (Это могло быть частично из-за правил цензуры, введенных после истории «Странных историй», намекавшей на некрофилию, хотя после смерти Лавкрафта Райт принял многие из историй, которые он изначально отвергал.)
Грин, двигаясь. туда, где была работа, переехал в Цинциннати, а затем в Кливленд; ее работа требовала постоянных поездок. К пугающей реальности неудач в городе с большим иммигрантским населением добавилась однокомнатная квартира Лавкрафта на Клинтон-стрит, 169 в Бруклин-Хайтс, недалеко от рабочего района набережной Ред-Хук, был ограблен, оставив только его одежду. В августе 1925 года он написал «Ужас на Ред-Хук » и «Он », в последнем из рассказчик говорит: «Я приехал в Нью-Йорк был ошибкой; […] вместо этого я нашел только чувство ужаса и угнетения, которые угрожают мне, парализовать и уничтожить меня ». Примерно в это же время он написал набросок для «Зов Ктулху », в котором говорилось о незначительности всего человечества. На еженедельное содержание, которое прислал Грин, Лавкрафт переехал в рабочий район Бруклин-Хайтс, где жил в крошечной квартирке. К 1926 году, когда он уехал в Провиденс, он потерял около 18 кг веса.
Возвращение в Провиденс
Последний дом Лавкрафта с мая 1933 года по 10 марта 1937 года
Снова в Провиденс, Лавкрафт жил в «просторном коричневом» викторианском деревянном доме «на 10 Барнс -стрит до 1933 года. Тот же адрес указан как дом доктора Уиллетта в книге Лавкрафта Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда. Период, начавшийся после его возвращения в Провиденс, — последнее десятилетие его жизни — был для Лавкрафта самым плодотворным; за это время он написал рассказы, а также свои самые длинные художественные произведения: Поиски снов неизвестного Кадата, Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда и В горах безумия. Он часто редактировал работы других авторов и выполнил большое количество ghostwriting, включая The Mound, Winged Death и The Diary of Alonzo Typer. Клиент Гарри Гудини хвалил его и пытался помочь Лавкрафту, познакомив его с главой газетного синдиката. Планы по дальнейшему проекту были разрушеныю Гудини.
Хотя он был в состоянии объединить свой отличительный стиль (намекающее и аморфное описание испуганными, но пассивными рассказчиками) с типом стандартного содержания и действия, который редактор Weird Сказки хотел — Райт щедро заплатил за книгу «Данвичский ужас », которая оказалась очень популярной среди читателей. Лавкрафт все чаще выпускал работы, не приносившие ему вознаграждения. Проявляя спокойное безразличие к восприятию своих произведений, Лавкрафт на самом деле был чувствителен к критике и легко впадал в отстранение. Было известно, что он отказался от попытки продать рассказ после того, как его однажды отвергли. Иногда, как в случае с «Тенью над Иннсмаутом» (которая включала зажигательную погоню, вызывающую действие), он писал историю, которая могла быть коммерчески жизнеспособной, но не пыталась ее продать. Лавкрафт игнорировал даже издателей. Он не отвечал, когда спрашивали о каком-нибудь романе, который Лавкрафт мог бы подготовить: хотя он закончил такую работу, «Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда», она так и не была напечатана. Через несколько лет после того, как Лавкрафт переехал в Провиденс, он и его жена Соня Грин, так долго прожившие отдельно, согласились на мирный развод. Грин переехал в Калифорнию в 1933 году и снова женился в 1936 году, не зная, что Лавкрафт, несмотря на его заверения в обратном, никогда официально не подписывал окончательный указ.
Последние годы и смерть
Лавкрафт так и не смог. чтобы покрыть даже базовые расходы, продавая рассказы и выполняя оплачиваемую литературную работу для других. Он жил скромно, питаясь наследством, которое к моменту его смерти было почти исчерпано. Иногда он оставался без еды, чтобы оплатить стоимость рассылки писем. После отъезда из Нью-Йорка он вместе со своей выжившей тетей переехал в квартиру на Барнс-стрит, недалеко от Университета Брауна; В результате Великой депрессии он перешел в сторону социализма, осудив свои прежние убеждения, так и растущую волну фашизма. Он поддерживал Франклина Д. Рузвельта, но считал, что Новый курс недостаточно левый.
Х. Надгробие П. Лавкрафта
В конце 1936 года он стал свидетелем публикации Тень над Иннсмутом в мягкой обложке. Однако Лавкрафт был недоволен, так как его книга была пронизана ошибками. Он продавался медленно, и было выпущено всего около 200 копий. Остальные копии были уничтожены после того, как издательство прекратило свою деятельность. К этому моменту литературная карьера Лавкрафта подошла к концу. Вскоре после написания своего последнего оригинального рассказа «Призрак тьмы » он заявил, что враждебный прием «В горах безумия» сделал «больше, чем что-либо, чтобы положить конец моей успешной художественной карьере».
11 июня Роберт Э. Ховард покончил жизнь самоубийством после того, как ему сказали, что его мать не выйдет из комы. Вскоре после этого умерла его мать. Это глубоко полезуло Лавкрафта, утешившего отца Говарда. Почти сразу Лавкрафт написал краткие мемуары под названием «Памяти Роберта Эрвина Ховарда». Темное время физическое здоровье Лавкрафта плохое. Он страдал от недуга, который он называл «гриппом». После посещения врача ему поставили диагноз терминальный рак тонкой кишки. Из-за боязни врачей Лавкрафта обследовали всего за месяц до его смерти. Все это время он оставался в больнице. Он жил в постоянной боли до своей смерти 15 марта 1937 года в Провиденсе. В соответствии со своим пожизненным научным любопытством он вел дневник своей болезни до тех пор, пока не стал физически неспособен держать ручку. Лавкрафт был указан вместе со своими родителями на семейном памятнике Филлипсов (41 ° 51′14 ″ N 71 ° 22′52 ″ W / 41,8540176 ° N 71,3810921 ° W / 41,8540176; -71,3810921 ). В 1977 году фанаты установили надгробие на Swan Point Cemetery, на котором они написали его имя, даты его рождения и смерти, а также фразу «Я ЕСМЬ ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЕ» — строчку из одного из его личных писем.
Влияния
Его интерес начался с детских лет, когда его дедушка, который предпочитал готические истории, рассказывал ему истории собственного сочинения. В доме детства Лавкрафта на Энджелл-стрит была большая библиотека. В этой библиотеке хранилась классическая литература, научные труды и ранняя фантастическая литература. В пятилетнем возрасте Лавкрафт любил читать Тысяча и одна ночь, а годом позже читал Хоторн. Также на него повлияла литература о путешествиях Джона Мандевиля и Марко Поло. Это привело к его открытию пробелов, которые помешали Лавкрафту совершить самоубийство в подростковом возрасте. Эти рассказы о путешествиях, возможно, также повлияли на то, как более поздние произведения Лавкрафта описывают своих персонажей и места проживания. Например, есть сходство между силами тибетских чародеев в Путешествиях Поло и силами, высвобожденными на Сторожевом холме в «Данвичском ужасе «.
. Одним из самых значительных литературных влияний Лавкрафта был Эдгар. Аллан По, которого он назвал своим «Богом художественной литературы». Как и Лавкрафт, По не шел в ногу с преобладающими литературными тенденциями своей эпохи. Оба автора создавали отличительные, уникальные миры фантазии и использовали архаизмы в Это влияние можно найти в таких произведениях, как его новелла Тень над Иннсмутом, где Лавкрафт ссылается на рассказ По «Бес извращенца » по имени в главе 3 и в его стихотворение «Немезида», где «… охраняемые гулами врата сна» предполагают «… преследуемый гулами лесной массив Вейра», найденный в «Улалуме » По. Прямая цитата из стихотворение и ссылка на единственный роман По Рассказ Артура Гордона Пима из Нантакета упоминается в книге Лавкрафта magnum opus В Горах Безумия. У обоих авторов также было много биографических сходств, таких как потеря их отцов в молодом возрасте и ранний интерес к поэзии.
На него оказали влияние Артур Мейчен, тщательно составленные рассказы о выживание древнего зла в наше время в реалистичном мире и его вера в скрытые тайны, лежащие за реальностью. На Лавкрафта также повлияли такие авторы, как Освальд Спенглер и Роберт У. Чемберс. Чемберс был автором Короля в желтом, о котором Лавкрафт написал в письме Кларку Эштону Смиту : «Чемберс похож на Руперта Хьюза и некоторых других падшие Титаны — с правильным интеллектом и образованием, но полностью лишенные привычки их использовать «. Открытие Лавкрафтом историй о лорде Дансани с их пантеоном могущественных богов, существующих в похожих на сновидения мирах, двинуло его творчество в новом направлении, что привело к серии имитационных фантазий в сеттинге Dreamlands.
Лавкрафт также процитировал Алджернона Блэквуда как источник влияния, цитируя Кентавра в главном абзаце «Зов Ктулху ». Он объявил рассказ Блэквуда Ивы лучшим из когда-либо написанных фантастических произведений. Другое вдохновение пришло из совершенно другого источника: научного прогресса в биологии, астрономии, геологии и физике. Его исследования внесли свой вклад в представление Лавкрафтом о незначительной, бессильной и обреченной на материалистическую и механистическую вселенную. Лавкрафт был увлеченным астрономом-любителем с часто посещениями Лэддскую обсерваторию в Провиденсе и писал многочисленные астрономические статьи для своего личного журнала и местных газет.
Материалистические взгляды Лавкрафта побудили его поддержать его философские взгляды через его художественную литературу; эти философские взгляды получили название космицизм. Космизм приобрел более пессимистический тон, создаваемое то, что сейчас известно как Мифы Ктулху; вымышленная вселенная, содержащая инопланетные божества и ужасы. Термин «Мифы Ктулху», вероятно, был придуман корреспондентом и протеже Лавкрафта Августом Дерлетом после смерти Лавкрафта. В своих письмах Лавкрафт в шутку называл свою вымышленную мифологию «Йог-Сототери».
Сны сыграли роль в литературной карьере Лавкрафта. Однако большинство его рассказов не являются записанными сновидениями. Напротив, на многих из них напрямую воздействуют сны и сновидческие явления. В своих письмах Лавкрафт часто сравнивал своих персонажей с мечтателями. Они описываются как беспомощные, как настоящий мечтатель, переживающий кошмар. В его рассказах тоже есть сказочные качества. В рассказах Рэндольфа Картера разбирается разделение между мечтами и реальностью. сказочные земли в Сновидения Неизвестного Кадата — это общий мир снов, доступ к которому может получить чувствительный сновидец. Между тем, в «Серебряный ключ » Лавкрафт включает концепцию «внутренние снов», которая подразумевает существование внешних снов. Берлесон сравнивает эту деконструкцию с аргументом Карла Юнга о том, что создало архетипических мифов. Способ написания художественной литературы Лавкрафта требовал как уровня реализма, так и сказочных элементов. Ссылаясь на Юнга, Берлесон утверждает, что писатель может создавать реализм, вдохновляясь сновидениями.
Использование Лавкрафтом британского английского во многом обязано влиянию его отца. Он описал своего отца как настолько англофила, что его обычно считали англичанином. По словам Лавкрафта, его постоянно предупреждают, чтобы он не использовал американизированные слова и фразы. Это влияние простиралось далеко за пределы использования языка Лавкрафтом. Англофилия его отца также вызвала у Лавкрафта глубокую привязанность к британской культуре и Британской империи.
Темам
В рассказах Лавкрафта повторяются несколько тем:
Теперь все рассказы основаны на Фундаментальная рыба, что общие человеческие законы, интересы и эмоции не имеют силы или значения в огромном космосе в целом. Для меня нет ничего, кроме ребячества в сказке, в которой существует человеческий облик — а также местные человеческие страсти, условия и стандарты — представлены как уроженцы других миров или других вселенных. Чтобы достичь сущности внешних факторов, будь то время, пространство или измерение, такие вещи, как органическая жизнь, добро и зло, любовь и ненависть, и все такие локальные атрибуты ничтожной и временной расы, называемые человечеством, имеют какие- либо наличие вообще. Только человеческие сцены и персонажи должны обладать человеческими качествами. С ними нужно обращаться с беспощадным реализмом (не романтизмом за гроши), но когда мы пересекаем черту безграничного и отвратительного неизвестного — преследуемого тенями — мы должны помнить о том, чтобы оставить нашу человечность и земной дух на пороге.
— Г.П. Лавкрафт в записке редактору Weird Tales о повторном представлении «Зова Ктулху»
Запрещенное знание
Запрещенное, темное, эзотерически завуалированное знание является центральной темой многих работ Лавкрафта. Многие из его персонажей движимы любопытством или научными усилиями, или во многих его рассказах открытое ими знание доказывает прометеев в природе, либо наполняя полностью искателя сожалением о том, что они узнали, разрушая его психологически, либо уничтожить человека, владеющего знаниями. Некоторые критики утверждают, что эта тема является отражением презрения Лавкрафта к окружающему миру.
Нечеловеческое влияние на человечество
Существа Лавкрафта мифы часто имеют человеческих слуг; Ктулху, например, под именами поклоняются культами как в гренландских инуитах, так и в кругах вуду Луизианы, а также во многих в других частей света.
Эти прихожане служили полезной повествовательной цели для Лавкрафта. Многие существа Мифа были слишком сильны, чтобы их могли победить человеческие противники, и настолько ужасны, что прямое знание о них означало безумие для жертвы. Имея дело с такими существами, нужна возможность обеспечить экспозицию и создать, не доводя историю до преждевременного конца. Последователи людей дали ему возможность раскрыть информацию об их «богах» в разбавленной форме, а также позволили его главным героям одерживать ничтожные победы. Лавкрафт, как и его современники, считал «дикарей» более близкими к сверхъестественным знаниям, неизвестным цивилизованному человеку.
Судьба
Часто в произведениях Лавкрафта главный герой не контролирует свои действия или считает невозможным изменить курс. Многие из его персонажей были бы свободны от опасности, если бы им просто удалось убежать; однако эта возможность либо никогда не ограничивается какой-то внешней силой, например, в «Цвет из космоса » возникает и «Сны в Доме ведьм ». Часто его персонажи подвергаются компульсивному влиянию со стороны могущественных недоброжелательных или равнодушных существ. (Существо на пороге, «Посторонний », Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда). В некоторых случаях эта гибель проявляется для всего человечества, и побег невозможен (Тень вне времени ).
Еще одна повторяющаяся тема в рассказах Лавкрафта — это идея о том, что потомки в родословной никогда не смог избежать пятен преступлений, совершенных их предками, по крайней мере, если преступления достаточно ужасны. Потомки могут быть очень далеки, как по месту, так и во времени (и, действительно, в виновности ), от самого акта, и тем не менее, может преследовать призрачное прошлое, например «Крысы в стенах »,« Скрытый страх »,« Факты, касающиеся покойного Артура Джермина и его семьи »,« Алхимик », Тень над Иннсмутом, «Рок, пришедший на Сарнат » и Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда.
Цивилизация под угрозой
Лавкрафт был знаком с работами немецкого консервативно- революционного теоретика Освальда Шпенглера, чей пессимистический тезис о декадансе современного Запада сформированный решающий элемент в общем антисовременном мировоззрении Лавкрафта. Спенглеровские образы циклического упадка присутствуют, в частности, в «В безумия»..Т. Джоши в своей книге «Лавкрафт: упадок Запада» помещает Шпенглера в центр своего обсуждения политических и философских идей Лавкрафта.
Лавкрафт писал Кларку Эш тону Смиту в 1927 году: «Это мое убеждение, и было так задолго до того, как Шпенглер поставил на свою печать научного доказательства, что наш механический и индустриальный век — это век откровенного упадка «. Лавкрафт был также знаком с трудами другого немецкого философа декаданса: Фридрих Ницше.
Лавкрафт имел дело с идеей цивилизации, борющейся с темным, примитивным варварством. В некоторых историях эта борьба ведется на индивидуальном уровне; многие из его главных героев — культурные, высокообразованные люди, которые постепенно развращаются каким-то неясным и внушающим страховым населением. В таких историях проклятие часто бывает наследственным, либо из-за скрещивания нечеловеческими (например, Факты о покойном Артуре Джермине и его семье (1920), Тень над Инсмутом (1931)) или через прямое магическое влияние (Дело Чарльза Декстера Уорда).
В других сказках всему обществу угрожает варварство. Иногда возникает проблема как внешняя угроза, когда цивилизованная раса уничтожается в войне (например, «Polaris »). Иногда изолированный очаг человечества попадает в упадок и атавизм сам по себе (например, «Скрытый страх »). Обычно в таких историях говорится о том, что цивилизованная культура постепенно подрывается злобными низшими слоями населения, находящимися под нечеловеческими силами.
Раса
Раса — наиболее противоречивый аспект Лавкрафта, выраженный во многих пренебрежительных замечаниях против различных неанглосаксонских рас и культурных в его работах. Когда он стал старше, его первоначальное англосаксонское расовое мировоззрение смягчилось до классизма или элитарности, согласно которой высшая раса включала в себя всех тех, кто возвысился благодаря высокой культуре. С самого начала Лавкрафт не относился ко всем белым в одинаковом высоком уважении, а скорее уважал англичан и людей английского происхождения. Он хвалил не- WASP группы, такие как латиноамериканцы и евреи; однако его личные работы о таких группах, как чернокожие, ирландские католики и немецкие иммигранты, были неизменно. В раннем стихотворении 1912 года «О сотворении негров » Лавкрафт черных людей не как людей, а как «зверю [зверь]… в полу-человеческом обличье, наполненном пороком». В своих ранних ранних эссе, частных письмах и личных высказываниях он приводил доводы в пользу сильной цветной линии для сохранения расы и культуры. Он привел эти аргументы путем прямого пренебрежения к другим журналистам и письмах, возможно, аллегорическим путем своей художественной литературы о нечеловеческих расах. Лавкрафт проявил сочувствие к тем, кто принял западную культуру, даже до такой степени, что он считал «хорошо ассимилированной». К 1930-м годам взгляды Лавкрафта на этническую принадлежность сместились в сторону поддержки культурной целостности; он поддержал сохранение культуры нации ради нее самой. Расовые взгляды Лавкрафта были обычным явлением в обществе того времени, особенно в Новой Англии, в которой он вырос.
Риски научной эры
На рубеже 20-го века человечество увеличилось. опора на науку открывала новые миры и укрепляла понимание нашего. Лавкрафт изображает этот потенциал для растущего разрыва в понимании человека Вселенной как потенциал для ужаса, особенно в «Цвете из космоса», где неспособность понять зараженный метеорит приводит к ужасу.
В письме к Джеймсу Ф. Мортону в 1923 году Лавкрафт специально указал на теорию относительности Альберта Эйнштейна как на бросающую мир в хаос и превращая космос в шутку; в письме к Вудберну Харрису в 1929 году он высказал предположение, что технологический комфорт может привести к краху науки. В то время, когда люди считали науку безграничной и могущественной, Лавкрафт представляет себе альтернативный потенциал и пугающие результаты. В «Зове Ктулху» персонажи Лавкрафта сталкиваются с архитектурой, которая «ненормальна, неевклидова и отвратительно пахнет сферами и измерениями, отличными от наших». Неевклидовария геометрия — это математический язык и фон Общая теория относительности Эйнштейна , и Лавкрафт неоднократно упоминался на ней, исследуя инопланетную археологию.
Религия и суеверия
Работы Лавкрафта управляются либо отдельными пантеонами божества (на самом деле инопланетянам поклонялись как бестолковыми людьми), либо безразличны, либо активно враебны человечеству. Личная философия Лавкрафта была названа «космическим безразличием», и это выражено в его произведениях. Некоторые из рассказов Лавкрафта о Древних (инопланетных существах из мифов Ктулху) предоставляют альтернативное мифическое происхождение человека в отличие от тех, которые встречаются в историях сотворения существующий религий, расширяя естественное мировоззрение. Например, в книге Лавкрафта В результате научных экспериментов, оставленных Старшие вещи, возникло в результате научных экспериментов, оставленных Старшие вещи. Главные герои Лавкрафта обычно образованные люди, которые доказаны на научные и рациональные доказательства в поддержку своего неверия. «Герберт Вест-Реаниматор » размышляет о атеизме, распространенном в академических кругах. В «Серебряный ключ » персонаж Рэндольф Картер теряет способность мечтать и ищет утешения в религии, в частности в конгрегационализме, но не находит его и в итоге теряет веру.
Сам Лавкрафт рано встал на сторону атеизма. В 1932 году он написал в письме к Роберту Э. Ховарду :
Все, что я сказал, это то, что я считаю чертовски маловероятным существованием чего-либо центральной космической воли, духовного мира или вечного выживания личности. Это самые нелепые и неоправданные предположения о вселенной, и я не настолько уязвим, чтобы делать вид, будто я не являющимся их явным и ничтожным самогоном. Теоретически я агностик, но пока не появятся радикальные доказательства, я должен быть классифицирован, практически и условно, как атеист «
В 1926 году знаменитый маг и эскапист Гарри Гудини попросил Лавкрафта написать трактат, исследующий тему суеверий позже в том же году остановила проект, но Рак суеверий был частично завершено Лавкрафтом вместе с соавтором CM Эдди -младший ранее неизвестная рукопись этого произведения была обнаружена в 2016 году в коллекции, принадлежащей магическому магазину, говорится, что «все суеверные верования являются пережитками общих« доисторических »« невежество »у людей», и продолжает исследовать различные суеверные верования. в разных культурах и в разные времена ».
Страна Лавкрафта
Лавкрафт широко заимствовал у себя на родине Новую Англию для установки в своей художественной литературе. ки, и несколько их беллетризованных версий часто появляются в его рассказах. Эти муниципалитеты расположены в задней половине вымышленного Массачусетса. Новое расположение этих муниципалитетов меняться в связи с моими литературными потребностями Лавкрафта. С областями, которые, по его мнению, вызывали воспоминания, Лавкрафт пересмотрел и преувеличил их под вымышленными именами. Например, Лавкрафт переименовал город Окем в Аркхэм и расширил его, включив в него ближайшую достопримечательность.
Критический прием
В рамках жанра
Автор 1957, Флойд К. Гейл из Galaxy Science Fiction сказал, что «как RE Howard, Лавкрафт, кажется, продолжается вечно; два десятилетия после их смерти — ничто. В любом случае они кажутся более плодовитыми, чем когда-либо. Что касается де Кампа, Ниберга и Дерлета, жадно искореняя каждый клочок своих произведений и превращая их в романы, возможно, никогда не будет конец их посмертной карьере «. Согласно Джойс Кэрол Оутс, Лавкрафта (и Эдгар Аллан По в XIX веке) оказал «неоценимое влияние на последующие поколения писателей фантастики ужасов». Автор ужасов, фэнтези и научной фантастики Стивен Кинг назвал Лавкрафта «Величайшим исполнителем классической сказки двадцатого века». Кинг ясно дал понять свою полуавтобиографическую научно-популярную книгу Danse Macabre, что Лавкрафт был ответственен за его собственное увлечение и мрачностью и оказал наибольшее влияние на его творчество.>
Литературный устно
Ранние попытки пересмотреть литературное представление о Лавкрафте как об авторе «целлюлозы» встретили сопротивление некоторых выдающихся критиков; в 1945 году Эдмунд Уилсон превратился: «Единственный настоящий у жас в большинстве этих произведений — это ужас безвкусицы и плохого искусства ». Однако Уилсон похвалил способность Лавкрафта писать о выбранной им области; он описал его как написавшего об этом «очень умно». По словам Л. Спрэга де Кампа, Уилсон позже улучшил свое мнение о Лавкрафте, цитируя отчет Давида Чавчавадзе о том, что Уилсон включил ссылку Лавкрафта в «Голубой огонек: пьеса в трех действиях». После, как Чавчавадзе встретился с ним, чтобы обсудить это, Уилсон сообщил, что читал копию переписки Лавкрафта. Обозреватель «Тайны и приключения» Уилл Каппи из New York Herald Tribune порекомендовал читателям сборник рассказов Лавкрафта, утверждая, что «литература ужасов и мрачных фэнтези принадлежит к тайнам в более широком смысле.. »
Обозреватель научной фантастики« Галактика »Флойд С. Гейл сказал, что «Лавкрафт в своих лучших проявлениях мог создать непревзойденное настроение ужаса; в худшем он был смешным ». В 1962 году Колин Уилсон в своем обзоре антиреалистических тенденций в художественной литературе «Сила мечтать» назвал Лавкрафта одним из пионеров «атаки на рациональность» и включил его в М. Р. Джеймс, Х. Дж. Уэллс, Олдос Хаксли, Дж. Р. Р. Толкин и другие как один из строителей мифизированных реалий, борющихся с провалившимся проектом литературного реализма. Впоследствии Лавкрафт начал приобретать статус культового писателя в контркультуре 1960-х годов, и количество переизданий его работ увеличилось.
Майкл Дирда, рецензент The Times Literary В приложении Лавкрафт описывается как «провидец», который «по праву считается вторым после Эдгара Аллана По в анналах американской литературы о сверхъестественном». По его словам, работы Лавкрафта доказывают, что человечество не может выдержать тяжести реальности, поскольку истинная природа реальности не может быть понята ни наукой, ни историей. Кроме того, Дирда хвалит способность Лавкрафта создавать сверхъестественную атмосферу. Эта атмосфера создается чувством неправильности, которое пронизывает предметы, места и людей в работах Лавкрафта. Он также положительно комментирует переписку Лавкрафта и сравнивает его с Горацием Уолполом. Особое внимание уделяется его переписке с Августом Дерлетом и Робертом Э. Ховардом. Письма Дерлета называются «восхитительными», а письма Говарда описываются как идеологические дебаты. В целом Дирда считает, что письма Лавкрафта не уступают его литературным произведениям или лучше их.
Los Angeles Review of Books рецензент Ник Маматас заявил, что Лавкрафт был особенно трудным автором, а не плохой. Он описал Лавкрафта как «совершенно способного» в области логики рассказа, темпов, новаторства и генерации фраз, которые можно цитировать. Однако трудности Лавкрафта делали его не подходящим для игры в мятеж; он был не в состоянии конкурировать с популярными повторяющимися главными героями и историями о несчастной девушке. Кроме того, он сравнил абзац из Тень вне времени с абзацем из введения к Экономические последствия мира. По мнению Маматаса, качества Лавкрафта скрываются из-за его трудностей, и именно его навыки позволили его последователям пережить последователей других выдающихся авторов, таких как Сибери Куинн и Кеннет Патчен.
В 2005 г. Библиотека Америки опубликовала сборник работ Лавкрафта. Этот том был рецензирован многими изданиями, включая The New York Times Book Review и The Wall Street Journal, и было продано 25 000 экземпляров в течение месяца после выпуска. Общий критический прием этого тома был неоднозначным. Несколько ученых, включая С. Т. Джоши и Элисон Сперлинг, сказали, что это подтверждает место Х. П. Лавкрафта в западном каноне. Редакторы «Эпохи Лавкрафта» Карл Х. Седерхольм и Джеффри Эндрю Вайншток приписали рост массового и академического интереса к Лавкрафту этому тому, наряду с томами Penguin Classics и Modern Библиотека издание В горах безумия. Эти тома привели к быстрому распространению других томов, содержащих работы Лавкрафта. По словам двух авторов, эти тома являются частью тенденции в популярном и академическом восприятии Лавкрафта: повышенное внимание одной аудитории вызывает больший интерес у другой. Успех Лавкрафта отчасти является результатом его успеха.
Стиль Лавкрафта часто подвергался критике, но такие ученые, как С. Т. Джоши показал, что Лавкрафт сознательно использовал различные литературные приемы для формирования своего собственного уникального стиля — к ним относятся прозаически-поэтический ритм, поток сознания, аллитерация и сознательный архаизм (в основном в его работах до 1921 года).
Философский
Философ Грэм Харман, рассматривая Лавкрафта как выражение уникального — хотя и неявного — антиредукционист онтология пишет: «Ни один другой писатель не был так озадачен разрывом между объектами и способностью языка описывать их, или между объектами и качествами, которыми они обладают». Харман сказал о ведущих фигурах первой конференции по спекулятивному реализму (в которую входили философы Квентин Мейяссу, Рэй Брассье и Иэн Гамильтон Грант ) что, хотя у них не было общих философских героев, все они увлеченно читали Лавкрафта. Спекулятивные реалисты, Марк Фишер и другие современные философы, относились к Лавкрафту серьезно, главным образом потому, что странный вымышленный мир Лавкрафта не имел ничего общего с настойчивостью готики в сверхъестественном, а представлял другую неоспоримую, но непостижимую реальность. По мнению ученого С. Т. Джоши : «В Лавкрафте никогда не бывает сущности, которой не было бы в модном материале». Философ Юджин Такер повторяет это в своей серии книг «Ужас философии», находя в идеях Лавкрафта «холодный рационализм» или «космический пессимизм», подчеркивающий ограниченность антропоцентрического мышления. Такер однажды охарактеризовал это как противоречие между фразами «Я не могу поверить в то, что вижу» и «Я не вижу того, во что верю».
Прием 2010-х и 2020-х годов
Несколько СМИ издательства опубликовали статьи, в которых обсуждали наследие Лавкрафта как писателя ужасов, а многие издания в 2010-е годы обсуждали и критиковали расизм и гомофобию Лавкрафта. Public Books связали воспитание Лавкрафта в Провиденсе с «расизмом, гомофобией, женоненавистничеством и вообще местничество «обнаруживается в его личных убеждениях и трудах, называя его« несомненно укорененным в местах, эстетике и своеобразном чувстве местной культуры ». Афроамериканский писатель-фантаст Н. К. Джемисин считает расовые установки Лавкрафта существенными для его литературного мира: «его предубеждения были основой его ужаса…. Он создает невероятные образы, это мощная работа, но это пугает… потому что это способ заглянуть в разум истинного фанатика и понять, насколько чуждо их мышление, насколько беспокоит их способность дегуманизировать своих собратьев ».
Первые World Fantasy Awards были проводился в Провиденсе в 1975 году. Тема была «Круг Лавкрафта». До 2015 года победителям был вручен удлиненный бюст Лавкрафта, созданный мультипликатором Гаханом Уилсоном по прозвищу «Ховард». В ноябре 2015 года было объявлено, что трофей World Fantasy Award больше не будет моделироваться по образцу Х. П. Лавкрафта. После того, как World Fantasy Award разорвала связь с Лавкрафтом, The Atlantic прокомментировали: «В конце концов, Лавкрафт все еще побеждает — люди, которые никогда не читали ни одной страницы его работ, будут знать, кто такой Ктулху в течение многих лет. и его наследие продолжает жить в работах Стивена Кинга, Гильермо дель Торо и Нила Геймана.»
. В 2020 году Лавкрафт был награжден премией 1945 года Премия Retro-Hugo за лучший сериал для мифов о Ктулху.
Наследие
Мемориальная доска Л.П. Лавкрафта на проспект-стрит, 22 в Провиденс.
Лавкрафт был относительно неизвестен при своей жизни. его рассказы появлялись в известных журналах, таких как Weird Tales (вызывая письма возмущения так же часто, как и похвалы от постоянных читателей), немногие люди знали его имя. Однако он регулярно переписывался с другими современными писателями, такими как Кларк Эштон Смит и Август Дерлет, который стал его хорошими друзьями, хотя никогда не встречался с ними лично. Эта группа стала известна как «Круг Лавкрафта», так как их сочинение свободно заимствовало мотивы Лавкрафта с его поддержки: таинственные книги с тревожными названиями, такими как Некрономикон, пантеон древних инопланетных существ, таких как Ктулху и Азатот, и жуткие места, такие как дурные предзнаменования Город Новой Англии Аркхэм и его Университет Мискатоник.
После смерти Лавкрафта Круг Лавкрафта продолжил свое существование. Август Дерлет, в частности, дополнил и расширил видение Лавкрафта, не без разногласий. В то время как Лавкрафт считал свой пантеон инопланетных богов простым сюжетным ходом, Дерлет создал целую космологию, полную войн между добрыми Старшими Богами и злыми Внешними Богами, например Ктулху и ему подобные. Предполагалось, что силы добра победили, заперев Ктулху и других под землей, океаном и в других местах.Рассказы Дерлета «Мифы Ктулху» продолжали связывать различные богов с традиционными четырьмя элементами огня, воздуха, земли и воды — искусственное ограничение, которое требовало рационализации со Дерлета, поскольку сам Лавкрафт никогда не предполагал такой схемы <82.>
Сочинения Лавкрафта, особенно так называемые «Мифы Ктулху», оказали влияние на авторов фантастики, в том числе современных авторов ужасов и фэнтези. Стивен Кинг, Рэмси Кэмпбелл, Алан Мур, Джунджи Ито, Томас Лиготти, Кейтлин Р. Кирнан, Уильям С. Берроуз и Нил Гейман назвали Лавкрафта одним из своих главных источников влияния. Помимо прямой адаптации, Лавкрафт и его рассказы оказали глубокое влияние на популярную культуру. Некоторое влияние было таким прямым, как он был другом, вдохновителем и корреспондентом многих своих современников, как Август Дерлет, Роберт Э. Ховард, Роберт Блох и Фриц Лейбер. Многие более поздние деятели находились под некоторыми работами Лавкрафта, в том числе автор и художник Клайв Баркер, плодовитый писатель ужасов Стивен Кинг, писатели комиксовлан Мур, Нил Гейман и Майк Миньола, английский писатель Колин Уилсон, режиссеры Джон Карпентер, Стюарт Гордон, Гильермо дель Торо и художник Х. Р. Гигер.
Япония также была сильно вдохновлена и напугана творениями Лавкрафта, и поэтому даже вошла в СМИ манга и аниме. Чиаки Дж. Конака — признанный ученик, он участвовал в Мифах Ктулху, расширяя несколько японских версий, что распространил влияние Лавкрафта среди аниме.
Аргентинский писатель Хорхе Луис Борхес написал свой рассказ «Есть и другие вещи » в память о Лавкрафте. Современный французский писатель Мишель Уэльбек написал литературную биографию Х. П. Лавкрафт: Против мира, против жизни. Известная американская писательница Джойс Кэрол Оутс написала вступление к сборнику рассказов Лавкрафта. Библиотека Америки опубликовала том работ Лавкрафта в 2005 году, перевернув традиционное суждение о том, что «не было ничего так далеко от принятого канона, как Лавкрафта». Французские философы Жиль Делез и Феликс Гваттари Называются на Лавкрафта в Тысячи плато, называя рассказ «Через Серебряного ворота ключа » один из его шедевров.
Группы энтузиастов ежегодно отмечают годовщины смерти Лавкрафта в Лэддской обсерватории и его рождения на месте его могилы. В июле 2013 года городской совет Провиденса обозначил «Мемориальная площадь Х. П. Лавкрафта» В 2016 году Лавкрафт был введен в Зал славы научной фантастики и фэнтези Музея поп-культуры.
Музыка
<памятный знак на пересечение улиц Энджелл и Проспект, недалеко от бывших резиденций автора. 329>Вымышленные мифы Лавкрафта повлияли на многих музыкантов., Особенно в рок-музыке. психоделический рок группа Х. П. Лавкрафт (который в 1970-х изменл свое имя до Лавкрафта, а затем — от Love Craft) выпустил альбомы Х. П. Лавкрафт и Х. П. Лавкрафт II в 1967 и 1968 годах соотве тственно; их песни включали «Белый корабль » и «В горах безумия», названные в честь рассказов Лавкрафта. Билл Траут и Джордж Бадонски, основавшие Dunwich Records, были поклонниками автора и получили разрешение Августа Дерлета использовать имя Лавкрафта для группы.
Metallica записала песня, вдохновленная «The Call of Cthulhu», инструментал под названием The Call of Ktulu, песня по мотивам Тень над Иннсмутом под названием The Thing That Should Not Beam и другая по мотивам Фрэнка Белкнапа Лонга из Псов Тиндалоса под названием All Nightmare Long. Позже они выпустили песню «Dream No More», в котором упоминается пробуждение Ктулху. Технический дэт-метал наряд Отзыв часто пишут песни, основанные на рассказах Лавкрафта, и часто используют его вдохновение в своих оригиналах. Работы. Самые темные заросли холма были названы на работы Лавкрафта в таких песнях, как «Shoggoths Away» и таких альбомах, как Ктулху наносит ответный удар. Согласно «Странным звукам Ктулху» Гэри Хилла, существующим смыслом их группы — ссылаться на сказки Лавкрафта. Их название происходит от строки в «Гробница «.
Игры
Лавкрафт также повлиял на игры, несмотря на то, что он ненавидел игры при своей жизни. Chaosium настольная ролевая игра Call of Cthulhu, выпущенная в 1981 году и в настоящее время находится в седьмом крупном издании, была одной из первых игр, в степени основанных на Лавкрафте. Роман к игре был вдохновлен Лавкрафтом. безумие механика, которая позволяетла персонажам игроков сходить с ума от контакта с космическими ужасами. Эта механика будет появляться в первых настольных и видеоиграх В 1987 году была выпущена одна из первых настольных игр Lovecraftian , Arkham Horror, которая очень хорошо продавалась, а с 2004 г. года все еще печатается из Fantasy Flight Games. Хотя несколько последующих настольных игр Лавкрафта выпускалось ежегодно с 1987 по 2014 год, спустя годы после 2014 года наблюдался всплеск числа настольных игр Лавкрафта, возможно, из-за того, что работы Лавкрафта стали достоянием общественности в сочетании с возрождение интереса к настольным играм.
Немногие видеоигры являются прямой адаптацией работ Лавкрафта, но многие видеоигры были вдохновлены Лавкрафтом или находились под его сильным влиянием. Массовая многопользовательская онлайн-игра World of Warcraft от Blizzard Entertainment постоянно раскрывала игрокам все больше историй происхождения игрового мира игры, большая часть которой очень точно отражает работы Лавкрафта или Дополнение Дерлета к оригинальному содержанию автора. Ужасы особенно могут включать в себя ужасы Ктулта, несмотря на конфликт между природой видеоигр «действуй и преобладай» и космической безнадежностью Лавкрафтовского ужаса. Помимо использования антагонистов-ктулхов, игры, вызывающие ужас Лавкрафта, использовали такие механики, как эффекты безумия или даже эффекты разрушения четвертой стены, которые подсказывают игрокам, что что-то пошло не так с их игровыми консолями.
Religion и оккультизм
Некоторые современные религии черпали влияние из работ Лавкрафта. Сатанинские ритуалы, написанные Антоном ЛаВеем или Майклом А. Акино, включают эссе, в котором утверждается, что произведения Лавкрафта несут частичную правду, используемую в той же символической манере, что и Сатана. Кеннет Грант из Тифонианского ордена включил мифы Лавкрафта в свою ритуальную и оккультную систему, но в более прямом и буквальном смысле, чем Церковь Сатаны. Однако Тифониан Орден не считает сущности существующими непосредственно, а скорее символом, через который люди могут взаимодействовать с чем-то бесчеловечным.
Было несколько книг, которые утверждали, что являются подлинным изданием книги Лавкрафта Некрономикон. Саймон Некрономикон — один из таких примеров. Его написал неизвестный человек, назвавшийся «Саймоном». Питер Левенда, оккультный автор, писавший о Некрономиконе, утверждает, что он и «Саймон» наткнулись на скрытый греческий перевод гримуара, просматривая коллекцию древностей в книжном магазине Нью-Йорка в 1960-х годах. или 1970-е годы. Утверждалось, что эта книга стала печатью Некрономикона. Левенда продолжал утверждать, что Лавкрафт имел доступ к этому предполагаемому свитку. Текстовый анализ показал, что содержание этой книги было получено из множества документов, в которых обсуждаются месопотамский миф и магия. Находка магического текста монахами также является частой темой в истории гримуаров. Было высказано предположение, что Лавенда является истинным автором «Некрономикона Саймона».
Лавкрафт в художественной литературе
Помимо его появления в Роберте Блохе Шамблер от Звезд, Лавкрафт продолжает использоваться как персонаж сверхъестественной фантастики. Ричард А. Лупофф Книга Лавкрафта (1985), Смертельное заклинание (1991), Некрономикон (1993), Охота на ведьм (1994), Out of Mind: Истории HP Lovecraft (1998), Stargate SG-1: Roswell (2007) и Алан Мур ‘ s комикс Провиденс (2015–17). Лавкрафт также появляется в серии 21 серии 6 сезона телешоу Сверхъестественное. Сатирическая версия Лавкрафта по имени Х. П. Хейткрафт появилась как повторяющийся персонаж в телесериале Cartoon Network Скуби-Ду! Mystery Incorporated. Другой персонаж, основанный на Лавкрафте, появляется в После жизни с Арчи. Он появляется как второстепенный персонаж в серии комиксов Брайана Клевингера Atomic Robo, как знакомый и научный сотрудник Николы Тесла, который сошёл с ума. благодаря его участию в Тунгусском событии, которое подвергло его скрытым ужасам более широкой вселенной. В конце концов его убивают, когда его тело становится хозяином разумного существа, заражающего поток времени. Лавкрафт — центральный элемент сюжета, а также персонаж романа Поля Ла Фаржа 2017 года «Ночной океан». В японской манге и аниме Bungo Stray Dogs есть персонаж, известный как Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт, который, как и другие персонажи сериала, назван в честь великих грамотных. Его сила «Великие Древние» отдает дань уважения его классическому рассказу «Зов Ктулху», который дает ему возможность превращаться в осьминога-монстра, напоминающего Ктулху.
Издания и сборники Работы
На протяжении большей части ХХ века окончательные издания (в частности, «В горах безумия» и «Другие романы», «Дагон и другие жуткие сказки», «Ужас Данвича) и другие »и« Ужас в музее и другие редакции ») его прозы были опубликованы Аркхэм Хаус, издательством, изначально намеревающимся опубликовать произведение Лавкрафта, но с тех пор оно опубликовало также значительное количество другой литературы. Penguin Classics в настоящее время выпустила три тома работ Лавкрафта: Зов Ктулху и другие странные истории, The Thing on the Doorstep и Other Weird Stories и последний раз Сны в ведьмовском доме и другие странные истории. Они собирают стандартные тексты, отредактированные С. Т. «Тень вне времени» из «Снов в доме ведьм», который ранее был выпущен небольшими -press издатель Hippocampus Press. В 2005 году престижная Библиотека Америки канонизировала Лавкрафта, выпустив том рассказов под редакцией Питера Штрауба, линия Random House Modern Library выпустила «окончательное издание». «Лавкрафта» В горах безумия «(включая также Сверхъестественный ужас в литературе ).
В 2014 г. компания Liveright Publishing Corp./W. У. Нортон опубликовал« Новый аннотированный Х. П.. Лавкрафт », отредактированный Лесли С. Клингером, предоставленные 22 сказки Лавкрафта, с предисловием Аланом Муром ; в сентябре 2019 года был опубликован второй том аннотаций Клингера, Новый аннотированный HP Lovecraft: Beyond Аркхэм, собрав еще 25 сказок Лавкрафта, с вступлением Виктора ЛаВалля.
поэзия Лавкрафта в The Ancient Track: Полное собрание поэтических произведений Л. П. Лавкрафта (Night Shade Books, 2001), большая часть его детских работ, различные эссе на философские, политические и литературные темы, антикварные заметки и другие вещи можно найти в Miscellaneous Writings (Arkham House, 1989).) Эссе Лавкрафта «Сверхъестественный ужас в литературе», впервые опубликованное в 1927 году, представляет собой исторический обзор литературы. уж асов, доступной с примечаниями под названием «Сверхъестественный ужас в литературе с комментариями».
Переписка
Хотя Лавкрафт известен в основном своими фантастическими произведениями, большая часть его сочинений из объемных писем на самые разные темы, от фантастики и художественной критики до и истории. Биограф Лавкрафта Л. Спраг де Камп считает, что Лавкрафт за свою жизнь написал 100 000 писем, которые, как полагают, сохранилась.
Лавкрафт не был активным писателем в молодости. В 1931 году он признался: «Благодарю кого-либо за подарок таким тяжелым испытанием, что я предпочел бы написать пастырское послание из двухсот пятидесяти строк или двадцатистраничный трактат о перстнях Сатурн.» (SL 3.369–70) Первоначальный интерес к письмам был вызван его перепиской со своим двоюродным братом Филлипсом Гэмвеллом и его участие в любительском журналистском движении »Поздняя переписка Лавкрафта велась в основном с другими писателями-фантастами, а не с друзьями-журналистами его ранних лет. За 200 лет до нынешней даты, что могло бы вернуть письмо в колониальные времена США, до войны американской революции (войны, оскорбившей его англофилию), он объяснил, что, по его мнению, 18-й и 20-
Лавкрафт ясно заявляет, что его контакты с множеством разных людей посредством написания писем были одним из оснований, что его контакты с множеством разных людей были «лучшими», первые были периодом благородной науки. факторов в расширении его взглядов на мир: «Я обнаружил, что открыт для десятков точек зрения, которые иначе не были бы Мое понимание и симпатии расширились, и многие из моих социальных, политических и экономических взглядов были в результате увеличения знаний».
Пять издательств опубликовали письма Лавкрафта, наиболее заметно Arkham House с его пятитомным изданием «Избранные письма» (эти тома сильно сокращают буквы, которые они содержат). Другие издатели: Hippocampus Press (Письма Альфреду Галпину и др.), Night Shade Books (Тайны времени и духа: Письма Л.П. Лавкрафта и Дональда Вандрея и др..), Necronomicon Press (Письма Сэмюэлю Лавману и Винсенту Старрету и др.) И University of Tampa Press (О, счастливчик из Флориды: Письма Л.П. Лавкрафта к Р.Х. Барлоу). С. Т. Джоши руководит постоянной серией томов, в которых собираются полные письма Лавкрафта конкретным корреспондентам.
Авторское право и другие правовые вопросы
Несмотря на несколько утверждений об обратном, в настоящее время нет доказательств, что какая-либо компания или физическое лицо владеет автор правом на Какую-либо работу Лавкрафта принято считать, что он перешел в общественное достояние. Директива Европейского Союза от срока действия авторского права от 1993 г. расширила действие авторских прав до 70 лет после смерти автора. Все работы Лавкрафта, опубликованные при его жизни, стали государственным достоянием во всех 27 странах Европейского Союза 1 января 2008 года. В тех странах Бернской , которые ввели только минимальный период авторского права, действие авторского права истекает через 50 лет после того, как автор смерть. Что касается Соединенных Штатов, то все работы, опубликованные до 1925 года, являются общественным достоянием. Работы Лавкрафта, опубликованные при его жизни в период с 1925 по 1937 год, несомненно, будут лишены авторских прав, поскольку ежегодно ежегодно общественным достоянием в период с 2021 по 2033 год (в произведениях до 1978 года правило жизни +70 в США не имеет).
Лавкрафт уточнил, что молодой Р. Х. Барлоу должен был исполнять обязанности исполнителя его литературного имения, но эти инструкции не были включены в завещание. Тем не менее, его оставшаяся в живых тетя выполнила его пожелания, и после смерти Лавкрафта Барлоу получил ответственность за массивное и сложное литературное наследие. Барлоу передал большую часть документов, включая объемную переписку, в Библиотеку Джона Хэя и попытка организовать и поддержать другие сочинения Лавкрафта. Август Дерлет, писатель старше Барлоу и более авторитетный, чем Барлоу, боролся за контроль над литературным имением. Барлоу покончил жизнь самоубийством в 1951 году.
Протеже Лавкрафта и совладельцы Arkham House, Август Дерлет и Дональд Вандрей, часто претендовали на авторские права на работы Лавкрафта. 9 октября 1947 года Дерлет приобрел все права на Weird Tales. Однако самое позднее с апреля 1926 года Лавкрафт зарезервировал за собой все права на вторую печать рассказов, опубликованных в Weird Tales. «Странные сказки» могли владеть правами не более чем на шесть сказок Лавкрафта. Опять же, даже если Дерлет действительно получил авторские права на сказки Лавкрафта, никаких доказательств того, что авторские права были возобновлены. После смерти Дерлета в 1971 году его поверенный объявил, что весь литературный материал Лавкрафта является частью поместь Дерлет и что он будет защищен в максимально возможной степени ».
С. Т. Джоши в своей биографии Лавкрафта заключает, что утверждение Дерлета «почти наверняка вымышлены» и что большинство работ Лавкрафта опубликованных в любительской прессе, скорее всего, теперь находятся в открытом доступе. Авторские права на произведения Лавкрафта унаследованный единственный оставшийся наследник, названный в его завещании от 1912 года, его тетя Энни Гэмвелл. Когда Гэмвелл умерла в 1941 году, авторские права перешли к ее оставшимся потомкам, Этель Филлипс Морриш и Эдне Льюис, которые подписали документ, иногда называемый подарком Морриша-Льюиса, разрешающий Arkham House переиздать работы Лавкрафта, сохраняя при этом авторские права для себя. Поиски в Библиотеке Конгресса не было никаких доказательств, что эти авторские права возобновлены после 28-летнего периода, что делает вероятным, что эти работы теперь находятся в общественном достоянии.
Chaosium, издатели ролевой игры Call of Cthulhu, имеют товарный знак на фразе The Call of Cthulhu для использования в игровых продуктах. TSR, Inc., первоначальный издатель ролевой игры Advanced Dungeons Dragons, включил раздел о Мифах Ктулху в одно из ранних дополнений к игре, Божества и полубоги (установлен опубликовано в 1980 году, позже переименовано в Legends Lore). Позже TSR согласился удалить этот раздел по просьбе Хаоса.
Несмотря на юридические разногласия, связанные с работами Лавкрафта, сам Лавкрафт был чрезмерно щедр на свои собственные работы и другие заимствовать идеи из его рассказов и строить на них, особенно что касается его мифов о Ктулху. Онал других авторов ссылаться на его творения, такие как Некрономикон, Ктулху и Йог-Сотот. После его многих писателей внесли свой вклад в рассказы и обогатили общую мифологию мифов Ктулху, а также сделали многочисленные ссылки на его работы.
Библиография
См. Также
Спекулятивная фантастика / Портал ужасов
- Категория: H. Ученые П. Лавкрафта
Заметки
Ссылки
Источники
Дополнительная литература
Внешние ссылки
- Ежегодник Лавкрафта
- Архив HP Лавкрафта
- Историческое общество Лавкрафта
- Х. П. Лавкрафт в базе данных интернет-спекулятивной фантастики
- Х. П. Лавкрафт в Энциклопедии научной фантастики
- Х. П. Лавкрафт на IMDb
- H. Дискография П. Лавкрафта в Discogs
Библиотечные коллекции
- Коллекция Говарда П. Лавкрафта в специальных коллекциях в Библиотеке Джона Хэя (Университет Брауна )
- Коллекция Х.П. Лавкрафта в Отличительных собраниях Мемориальной библиотеки Фалви (Университет Вилланова )
Онлайн-издания
- Работы Говарда Филлипса Лавкрафта в Project Gutenberg
- Работы HP Lovecraft на Faded Page (Канада)
- Работы HP Lovecraft или о нем о компании HP Lovecraft на Internet Archive
- Работы HP Lovecraft в LibriVox (аудиокниги в общественном достоянии)
Говард Филлипс Лавкрафт — список книг по порядку, биография
20 августа 1890 — 15 марта 1937
Жанры автора
Хоррор/Ужасы (27.78%)
Рассказ (24.75%)
Мистика (22.73%)
Фантастика (6.57%)
Сказка/Притча (3.54%)
Фэнтези (3.03%)
Триллер (2.53%)
Проза (1.01%)
Космическая фантастика (1.01%)
Научная фантастика (1.01%)
Магический реализм (0.51%)
Поэзия (0.51%)
Повесть (0.51%)
Мифы. Легенды. Эпос (0.51%)
Классическая проза (0.51%)
Новелла (0.51%)
Реализм (0.51%)
Психоделика (0.51%)
Трагедия (0.51%)
Планетарная фантастика (0.51%)
Приключения (0.51%)
Городское фэнтези (0.51%)
Цитаты из книг автора
«То не мертво, что вечность охраняет,
Смерть вместе с вечностью порою умирает.»
Из книги «Безымянный город» — Все цитаты
Вы… Все существа Земли враждебны друг другу и получают удовольствие от несказанной жестокости.
Из книги «Вызов извне» — Все цитаты
Как мало знает земной человек о жизни и её пределах! Но больше ему, ради его же спокойствия, и не следует знать.
Из книги «По ту сторону сна» — Все цитаты
Самое бесполезное занятие, сказал юноша, задавать местным жителям вопросы.
Из книги «Морок над Инсмутом» — Все цитаты
..поры юности, когда удивление и удовольствие пронизывали таинство дней, а рассвет и закат равно полнились пророчествами под пронзительные звуки лютни и песни, распахивая ярящиеся врата к новым и ещё более удивительным чудесам.
Из книги «Сомнамбулический поиск неведомого Кадата» — Все цитаты